3030:
diffuse it. The stated reason is because it is too big. So there is three ways to go here. 1) You can chop it into pieces and diffuse it, 2) you can chop it into pieces and not diffuse it or 3)you can just leave it as a big category. If you diffuse it (#1), you loose the ability to browse through all comedy films. If you do subcategorizations and not diffuse it, you at least double all the categories for each film. Worse than that, people will start categories like "Comedy films by nationality", "Comedy films by year", "Comedy films by director", etc... You might end up with dozens of "Comedy film" categories for each film. This would add a tremendous amount of category clutter. So I'm advocating option #3. Just leave it alone and avoid category intersections. For every topic, we would designate the index level for the topic, and then (usually) only go one level below the index level. Both the index level and the sub-index level would be fully populated. "Films" would be an index level. Now I'm not advocating that all these films be included at higher "topic" levels. The topic levels are about topics and not about individual instances of the topic. This is the difference between
2963:. Most of the articles in this category belong in category Science. If some of them belong and some of them don't this tag is no help. Each high level category, like "Science" needs some specific instructions that help people understand what belongs and what doesn't. Slapping these all with "diffuse", which means nothing to the average person, just makes the category look bad while giving no real instruction about what should happen. Also, I think there are two things going on here. There are top level topic categories that are general topics, and there are also articles about the general topics. That is all well and good. But then lower down there are lower level index categories that are perfectly fine categories, worthy of being populated. But whenever they get big they get divided up. What will be the result if we continue in this direction? The only categories that we will be able to browse will be microscopic in their scope. Why do we assume that everyone wants to browse this way? Some people don't know what they are looking for. That is the definition of browsing. In our system the only way to browse is to know what you are looking for first. --
3897:. Samuel makes some good points here. At the moment, the category system could go in one of two ways. We could (a) carefully categorise the most relevant points as single tags, and then combine them through intersection, or (b) overcategorise and then rebuild the lists using the category structure and hoping that all articles in subcategories are actually related to the categories several layers up. I favour approach (a), and deleting this category would help prevent overcategorisation. It should, in any case, only be used on genuinely large categories that can be rebuilt from the contents of their subcategories. I suggest using "what links here" on the template, and removing it where it shouldn't be used. That would help. Again, one of the major problems is not being able to point to the 'final' version of what we are talking about. If we could compare the two approaches for a small area, this might help.
3193:
us hadn't even heard of
Knowledge two years ago! We do it because we think it improves navigability. You are the one that is living in the past - the first days of the category system when it wasn't detailed because it was immature and frankly just crap. I remember when I first read Knowledge, before I had an account, one had to use the search box to find most things because the category system was hopeless, and that is what I have been helping to fix. You know as well as I do that you are in a small minority on this matter and as far as I know you are in a minority of one in having such an extreme preference for vast categories. Please drop this hobby horse and move onto something more useful.
4085:
category I wanted by manually generating a list. Do you see the point I am making? People focus their interest at different levels, and we should provide the tools and options to generate categories and alphabetical indices at different levels, and with different levels of discrimination (between details and an overall picture). Ideally, the normal encyclopedia categorisation would be set at a compromise level reached by consensus, and then people can use tools to go beyond that. Either: (a) unify categories to generate a larger view, or (b) intersect categories to find articles common to both. Ultimately, both should be possible.
1986:- If you look at the amount of users that 'speak' konyo, you'll find that it's not just something the user made out of the blue. It's not offensive in the Philippines and I don't think the user who created the template should be warned. It just refers to the Filipino upper-class and their way of speaking. By the way, I couldn't disagree more with Dgies statement. It's more like the Filipino equivalent of Valley Girl... Well, if the phrase 'Valley Girl' had a swear word in it, at least. Konyo could be considered more of a 'language' than 'bullshit'... Anyways, I say userfy it, pare!
3020:"films". If you don't want to browse through "films", you go over to "films by type" or "films by year" and find the subcategorization you are looking for. You'd have a choice. What we do now is we take a category that is an index of a subject and decide to break it into small pieces and turn the original category (the index) into a navigation category. Instead of that, we could just leave the original index alone and create a new navigation category. This way you could have a choice. Look at the big topic or look at the smaller subdivision.
3352:. I really want to have a discussion about this. Even if this is kept, what can be done about it to make this template better, to better explain what should happen and why, to keep it from being applied wholesale to any category that gets large. Please, don't just say "keep" and ignore my concerns. I really think this is a serious problem and it will just get worse unless we address it. Also, I hope people will browse through German Knowledge. I think they have a much better handle on this than we do. --
4007:. Such alphabetical index lists allow us to look at both the big picture (all articles) and the detailed picture (how to organise those articles). My method of generating an alphabetical index list involves using the Category Scan tool I linked too (though as a toolserver tool that suffers from database replication lag), but I'd appreciate it, as a matter of editor-to-editor courtesy, if you would share your methods as well. That way we can both work to improve the encyclopedia, instead of throwing needless
3704:
frustrated when Film directors got broken up into categories by nationality. To counteract that developement, I created Film
Directors by language. At least I'd be able to look at all the English language film directors in one place. Now there is talk of dividing that category up. A question for everyone here: At what point do we say it doesn't matter how big some category gets, whatever size it is we're not going to depopulated it? Are we going to end up with
2926:
categorization. We should decide if the extra categorization is needed. If too many categories are being added, it is often because too many subcategories are being added. We cannot assume that just because we come up with a scheme for subcategorization that this will be useful or helpful to the majority of people who use
Knowledge. This practice has to be reined in. Deleting this template and the associated category would be a start.
4062:? Personally, all I can tell is that they start with a B. Imagine the category "Earthquakes" with hundreds of titles like that. While I will accept that it would be somehow useful to you, I propose that you are a rara avis. How do I generate such a list? I'm a humble manual mouse, I click through subcategories for what I want. And yet, in 9 cases out of 10, for 99 people (or mice) out of 100, having subcategories is much more useful.
3741:. Some categories contain thousands of articles. In these extreme cases I find it hard to imagine who will browse through the category looking for related information - if useful subcategories can be created then these would be clear candidates for diffusion. Whilst it is possible to over-extend the level of subcategorization, I have yet to see this template applied to a small category which has unjustifiably tiny subcategories.
3158:. How is anyone supposed to understand what belongs and what doesn't from reading this template? Can any general purpose template explain which articles belong in this category and which belong in the subcategory? I'm working on a proposal to replace template like this one with more user friendly ones that help people understand what is in the category. I'd be happy if anyone would like to help. Please take a look at
2525:. Really though, I would prefer to not have any license template named "Free Use" (even as a redirect) since your average Knowledge editor seems to easily confuse "Free Use" with "Fair Use". I would prefer that we delete it outright. If someone does recreate the template, I would just nominate it for deletion again. The fact that someone might recreate the template is not a very good argument against deletion, IMO.
2438:. It has been a very problematic template due to vague wording and frequent confusion between the meaning of "free use" and "fair use". The consensus of all discussions of its fate so far have been to dispense with it in favor of better-worded alternatives. Migration of all transclusions was approved in November and finally completed this week. Please see discussion
2611:- So you disregarded procedures and deleted an image without notifying the uploader on his talk page. If you took more then 5 minutes to look at the page you would have seen that I am Shawn Clark, and I can changed the license on the image by request when the page it was on came up for FA nomination. You are exactly the type of admins that are ruining Knowledge.
3962:. Do you want to thoroughly peruse Knowledge's detailed coverage of all earthquakes known to science? Well, then you're going to have to click around 20 subcategories - but then you're going to want to be reading hundreds of articles anyway, so I'm not going to apologize too much for making you read 20 more category pages in addition.
1444:- In the previous TfD I advocated giving leeway if it was trimmed to include only chapters which had an article that asserted notability. Upon closer inspection, must bluelinks are redirects and there are only perhaps two notable chapters; therefore this template is unnecessary and will encourage vanity articles. —
2917:
has to be put to rest. There is no reason that a category cannot be ANY size. If the topic is big, you can break it down to smaller pieces if those are useful and help people browse through similar articles. However, we should make the decisions about category groupings based solely on utility. The question is
3009:
with every film article in
Knowledge. We have oodles of subcategories for subcategorizations of film, we have Films by nationality, by language, by director, by genre, etc... There are dozens of these sub-classificaitons. All of these are just fine categories and they should all be fully populated.
2991:
I am not advocating that we stop categorizing with precision. I am just saying that wholesale diffusion of useful categories should not happen. I am making a distinction between a) the diffusion of categories into smaller sub-categories and b) simply creating new sub-categories and populating them
2900:
This template, and the associated category are a bad idea. They give the impression that all big categories must be diffused into smaller ones. This is not true (though it is very common unquestioned assumption). BIG CATEGORIES ARE NOT BAD. I've specifically asked Brion (who manages the WIkipedia
1107:
Okay, this is a "current events" template of sorts, but it's very under-used. When I found it, it was used on just 3 articles, and had been on each of them for over a month, so I removed it. The template as worded could apply to basically tens of thousands of topics... "This article documents subject
4084:
is a start, but not enough. You also seem to miss the point about how both systems can be useful. Sometimes I think, hmm, I want such-and-such a category, and I go looking and find it. Othertimes I find the category I was looking for has been diffused into numerous subcats, and I have to rebuild the
3759:
is another example - all it tells me is that anti-communists are of various nationalities, which I knew already. If the parent category listed all the articles in its subcats automatically (on the top page), that would be fine; or at least gave some idea of how many anti-communists are hiding in the
3210:
You see this as a black and white issue and that is your right. I may be in a minority, but that doesn't necessarily mean that I am wrong. You seem to think that having large categories will somehow make it impossible to have specific ones, and that is not what I am advocating at all, and it never
3192:
Samuel you keep repeating this claim that we only have detailed categories because of a collective memory of a technical issue from two years ago but it is complete and utter rubbish. There must be thousands of people who have contributed to moving towards a more detailed category system and most of
3249:
topic of
American History. It adds information to put a specific Civil War battle in a category about "American Civil War battles" and not in "American History". The article has a "X is a Y" relationship with the "Civil War battles" category. My point again, is that unlike our present situation,
3051:
If you've followed what I'm saying thus far, I'm saying that the index categories, like "films" should not be diffused. I've already mentioned that the higher level topic categories are not helped by this template either. In those cases some of the articles belong and some don't and the template
2916:
that says you must diffuse large categories into smaller ones. I'm sure of this because I wrote the most recent overhaul of the guidelines. The idea that every large category must be broken down into tiny subcategories is archaic. It is a hold-over from
Knowledge culture from two years ago that
2541:
Public domaining an image, has different legal consequences then a person maintaining the copyright of an image but allowing all free usage of the image. Also changing the copyright status without asking to the author is asking for trouble, particularly when the image permission was obtained from a
3029:
Continuing with the "film" example. We now have dozens of those subcategories by film type or year, all populated, which is just fine. Over time, some of them have grown quite big. For example "Comedy films" has about 4000 films in it. There's a move to chop this category into small pieces and
2977:
What we need is more people making an effort to categorize with precision and the benefit of lateral thinking. This is an excellent template. The promise that software intersection on the fly would be added to the software shortly has been around as long as I have known
Knowledge so it is anyone's
2762:
change or remove image copyright tags, as whatever the copyright holder uploaded as, is the legal statement. One should never retroactively changed a legal declaration. If somebody makes a legal declaration of copyright release, then either that release is adequate (leave it alone) or inadequate
1706:
it. Besides, that was created during a time when using actual language codes still was not important to WP, seeing that templates for
Southern Californian (whose description went something like, “Dude… this user… like… speaks English… dude…”), etc. existed. Which brings me to ask: What about those
3928:
for a recent CfD (School massacres), you can select "show all articles" as the filter option, and get a reasonable list there. Category Tree, as that page says, has been implemented on
Knowledge, but "show all articles" hasn't. That funtions would really help, and is probably closer than Category
3879:
A flat "view" of a category would alter the whole discussion (as would intersections on the fly). I agree that both (essentially unions of subcats or intersections of supercats) are software issues, but have no idea how easy either might be. Many thanks for the terminology - it is exactly what I
3703:
is no longer populated? It has been diffued into
Canadian writers by type. Why can't I browse through all Canadian writers? What if I don't care if they write novels, plays, or poetry? I'm proposing that we pick a general and specific level for all these categories and stick with them. I got
3267:
directly populated by films, it is not mine. You do not speak for the masses, but only for yourself, and your views are eccentric as this discussion shows. Knowledge has far too many films for that to make sense or be useful and in any case the contents of subcategories are the population of the
3540:
to see if there is already a better, more specific category. That is different than people specifically thinking we don't need the subcategories. I agree that sometimes it would be very useful to see a flat, sorted list of all articles in all subcategories of a given category, or to be able to
3019:
It is also great that we can offer all the subcategorizations like "films directed by John Ford" and "Australian films". So are these precise enough? The precision involved is putting each film into the subcategories that it belongs. I'm all in favor. On top of that I'd also like it to be in
2714:
High time we got rid of this, copyright issues are confusing enough without this. Some people just see "copyrighted" and use it on everyting, others just see "free" and use it on everyting they didn't pay for, and then there are the free/fair confusion and "with permission" mess mentioned above.
4049:
I'll need to tread carefully to avoid having to apologise again! "...look over a contents index and see if anything looks interesting." is not a tremendously focused goal - can you really tell that much from a long alphabetized list of article titles? Which of these "looks interesting" to you:
3910:
per everybody and their brother. As so many write, when, in the by and by, super duper software becomes available to do everything, it may just as easily become available for doing sub-category intersection, not a noticeably harder problem. Meanwhile, having smaller categories is not only more
3416:
Samuel Wantman is quite wrong to suggest that this template orders people to remove all articles regardless of the appropriateness of doing so. It is perfectly clear that it actually simply requests that they remove them when appropriate. I am troubled by Samuel's apparent lack of trust in the
3394:
is an example of where this template makes a lot of sense. If I had to guess, I'd say we have in excess of 1,000 articles related to Microsoft "stuff", spread across dozens of categories. If you have a look at the contents of the category now, it's picked up a number of articles that, while
3240:
What everyone seems to be missing is that many of these categories get "silted up" because people want to have these categories populated. It is the natural inclination to have categories like "Films" populated with films! Why do we keep fighting the masses on this? I am talking about only
2925:
on the fly. If we do want to have smaller subcategories, the larger ones do not necessarily need to be depopulated. If they were useful groupings when they were small they remain useful groupings when they get big. The large category should remain, and the smaller ones should duplicate the
2757:
Comments: I have no great objection to deletion. But I also see no benefit, to this standard practice of removing "commonly misused" tags, which merely encourages people to misuse other tags, which in-turn, become less reliable. It used to be you could pretty much predict which images were
3122:
What would be so terrible if we had "Australian people" and all the subcategories as well? It would add a single category to each persons article and you'd be able to see a complete index of Australian people. If navigation to the subcategories is difficult, you could create an additional
1360:
seems to suggest a consensus to delete. It is only being used on 3 chapter articles, there are about 7 redirects in there, and the rest are 200+ red links. The template's sole purpose is to encourage the creation of articles on individual chapters of the fraternity which are almost always
3438:
Yes, it has a great deal to do with trust. I don't doubt that you are acting in good faith so your accusation is out of place. But I think you have misguided ideas about where we need to get to and a lack of trust in the ability of others to make the right decisions about how to get there.
946:
Chibi means Runt and it is not slang. Its slang amoung anime fandom though. Any one familer with sailor Moon knows this defintly and many other fans know this. and remember its for SM only . Also we always use the JP version over the buchery they call a dub at the project. It is staying...
3645:
to push the idea that duplicate categorization and/or pulling away from differentiating categories would be at all a positive development. If category intersections are in the works, then we can figure out how to revise our category scheme when that is in place; in the meantime, this is
3038:. Each article should be put in the most specific topic or index level category that it belongs. I have no problem with that. But for the specific instances, the films, books, people, etc... here's the distinction I'm making: At some point, we will be making sub-categories
3010:
At the same time, I'm saying that it is perfectly reasonable to also have a category called "films" where you could browse through all the film articles. In book form, this would be called an INDEX. If you look at a book with film reviews there will be an index of all films.
3880:
meant. (The relatively recent 'tree' view of cats was an advance.) Sorry - I missed your earlier comtribution above while glancing through - this is quite a long discussion, amongst many other long discussions. (And is an overwhelming keep, so my own vote is immaterial.)
3175:
This category is very friendly and people can use their own judgement. I trust them to do that, but you seem to feel that we need cast iron rules for the classification each article in a particular field. We don't, Knowledge is organic and constantly improving.
971:
Um, the problem is that most WP users don't speak Japanese. Just because you look up Sailor Moon in an encyclopedia doesn't mean you already know everything about it, right? Sticking to English is standard WP policy, and for the creator to insist that one word
3844:
As I noted in my earlier vote, showing a "flat" view of a category, or your suggestion of adding an annotation to indicate how many pages are children of a category, are software issues. Those are easy to fix mechanically because it requires only
1118:, so there's really no need for it. The template was created out of an objection to the wording of the current event template (see the talk page) so I don't know, do we really want to have a seperate hardly-ever-used template? Do we want to change
1508:
and about 200 redlinks; the few articles it did have have now been deleted either via AFD or via CSD A7 (failing to assert notability). Then I noticed it was at TFD, so instead will suggest that we close and delete this as soon as is suitable.
3492:. I find this useful to mark large categories when there is a useful logical breakout to be made. This helps point out where there is work to consider. No one is forcing anything to be done, just suggesting the situation should be looked at.
4029:
Thank-you for the apology. On my part, I'm sorry if I reacted too strongly to your asking me why I wanted such a list. May I still ask how you generate such lists? Returning to the actual categorisation discussion, surely the ideal is for
3428:
It has nothing to do with trust. Please assume good faith. I'm trying to make the categorization system easier to use and easier to understand. In practice, many categories often get totally depopulated after this template is added. --
2792:
This terminology is far too confusing for new users. Effectively obsoleted by NoRightsReserved anyway, which also has the benefit of being much clearer terminology. "CopyrightedFreeUse" means "I found it on a public internet server" to a
3853:
category on Knowledge. Putting articles in the most specific category possible allows for maximum flexibility of the software in customizing the category display for individual user preferences. But putting articles in subcategories
3620:
practical or navigational benefit to having a single undifferentiated writers category that includes every single person on Knowledge who ever wrote a book, regardless of their nationality or their literary genre; there is a
3760:
various branches (or is it roots?). In some of these supercats one has dig down about 10 levels before finding an article - I use 'search', or google, not categories, to find anything. I expect to find anti-communists in
4075:
article doing there??" kind of thing. The example here probably was too broad, and it also includes non-Earthquake articles because of the vagaries of the categorisation system, but seriously, any useful encyclopedia
2661:
May 15th, 2005, that image was uploaded in 2004. Images uploaded before then can only be speedy deleted if they aren't used in any article. Don't let anger of someone opposing a deletion get in the way of procedures.
3455:"there is no technical reason that we have to break up big categories into small ones." Perhaps so, and some subcategorization is clearly excessive and would be best kept in the parent... but there is certainly a
1533:
and close discussion asap per Proto - it's a navigation template with nothing but red links and redirects to the same page. There's no possible use for it. It seems like further discussion would be pointless.
3831:- I would like to see who is included at one glance but I can't (there are only about 20 in there - it needs 20-odd clicks to see all the names - eg suppose I wanted to print out the names of those included).
3925:
3541:
search all articles in a category and its subcategories -- but those issues ought to be handled by software. Humans ought to concentrate on categorization issues that can't be handled mechanically. :-)
2901:
servers) about this and he says there is no technical reason that we have to break up big categories into small ones. We have category table of contents that can help us navigate through big categories {{
3388:. I suppose keeping this template because it does it can help us move to better categorization, but its use really needs to be limited to major "parent" categories that routinely collect new articles.
3975:
the reasons are that I want to browse an alphabetical index of Knowledge's earthquake articles. I don't want to read all of them, just look over a contents index and see if anything looks interesting.
4114:. I have nothing against keeping track of categories that tend to get overpopulated. However, there should be a list on a project page instead of a bunch of ugly tags on the individual categories.
2921:
Many large and huge categories are just fine and do not need to be broken down any smaller. Smaller intersections are also not necessary. Eventually, the software will add the capability of adding
1858:. The lack or presence of a code does not necessarily indicate that a particular linguistic phenomenon exists. Coño English is a type of English spoken by upper-class and/or educated Filipinos. --
3995:, I would like such a list to help organise editing efforts on earthquake articles. I too can produce such a list, but not everyone knows how to do this. Take a look at how I've handled this at
2942:
and create suitable guidelines for use. The fact that this template is applied too much—or in the wrong places—doesn't mean that there aren't cases (particularly top-level categories such as
136:
3721:
What if people don't share your view about what level should be chosen? Why should we all go along with whatever happens to suit you when we have perfectly good policies in place already?
1191:
only when the primary subject of the article is itself a "current event." Even so, there will likely continue to be a significant yet tolerable amount of inaccurate use of all of these. -
2909:}}. So categories do not necessarily have to be be broken up when they get large. Our categories are like book indexes which list all the articles on a topic in alphabetical order.
932:. Seems okay, but the word "chibi" really needs to be changed. This is an English encyclopedia, and people not familiar with Japanese slang will not understand what's being said.
2565:. Also, switching the template is not an issue. That action has already been debated, approved, and performed. This template is not currently used by any images (as of January 4).
347:
2776:
I agree for the most part, although in this case the wording is so vague it seems we must guess as to the uploader's intentions regardless of whether we change the tag or not.
1353:
563:
42:
37:
3924:
But what about here and now? Can you give me a list of all the earthquake articles we have? Can you give me a list of all the hurricane articles we have? If you look at
1935:
Warned? It wasn't use offensively. In the Philippines it has no offensive context. I mean, Howard's comment above indicated he didn't know about its offensiveness. --
355:
3227:
Wantman has a point, I suppose. Nevertheless this template seems to be useful for categories that should only contain subcategories that get silted up with articles.
3002:
3954:. Are you interested in detailed coverage of recent earthquakes, that were most likely to be thoroughly covered by modern media, and dealt with by modern methods?
3666:
more specific subcategories. Once CI is in place, and subcategorization can be automatically handled by the server automatically searching for set intersections
2758:
copyvios based on what tag they had (e.g. almost all of certain tags were bad, and the bulk of certain other tags were good). Also, in principal, we should
2182:
to provide browsing for state highway systems across Interstate and U.S. route pages. They have since been deprecated by a full set of "XX browse" templates (
2959:
I'm going to answer all these points. The problem is that this tag gives no indication of what should be in the category and what should be diffused. Take
3245:
topics should be in the most specific categories. If you look in "American history" all the subcategories and articles should be directly related to the
3251:
2763:(delete the image). But anyhow, it seems the tag has already been "unused", and the matter is settled, so I'm mainly just stating my opposition to this
4071:
I agree that long contents lists are often uninteresting and uninformative, but they can be useful to help keep a category area under control - "what's
3670:
of through manual category creation, index categorization will make more sense, but as long as we still have to manually create a separate category for
4341:. As for the POV "only certain browsers" - that's solved fairly simply - only those that are notable enough to have an article ought to be included. -
3782:
3281:
that we have more specific subcategories for many things. For instance, there's absolutely no reason why any writer should ever be filed directly in
3950:
a list of all the earthquake articles we have? Do you want to read an exhaustive, but necessarily brief, list of all earthquakes known to science?
1382:
to the main article to reference that chapter—and to explain the notability of the chapter and its history. I see no need to keep this template. —
1357:
3605:
2624:
3794:
The national categories can or should enable you to find those articles from the national people, politics and history categories, whereas if
3155:
3138:
3084:
1800:
1764:
1668:
3625:
of practical benefit to subclassifying writers by their cultural context and subject matter. Any category that could simultaneously include
21:
3241:
categories named X where each article Y is an X. This does not include broad topics like Art, Science, American History, etc... Articles
2455:
per nominator. The issue of license tagging is hard enough to figure out as it is without superfluous and old templates floating around.
2562:
2439:
2202:...) that perform the same feature, except in a much more cleaner and presentable fashion. As such, the srbox pieces should be deleted.
1874:
if someone really wants it ... if this language doesn't actually exist and is only a profane template, why keep it in template space? --
4080:
be able to produce, instantly, a list of all its articles on actual earthquakes. That is not an unreasonable request. To be pointed at
3374:'s sentiments that the template needs to be edited so that it is simply not applied to any large category but appropriate categories.
2486:(second choice). The name really ought to be kept around ... otherwise, someone is just going to make it again six months from now. --
4247:
3777:
Quick, since I last looked an actual anti-communist has appeared. Hide him, he (or she) must have some nationality, or if not we need
3459:
reason for subcategorization that aids readability and navigability. When such a concern exists, this template makes a lot of sense.
3824:
577:
3471:. This template does nothing but encourage excessive overcategorizing, making navigation of categories cumbersome and tedious. -
4333:- informative and useful on article for those web browsers. If I'm on the IE article, it would be quite helpful to have a link to
196:
151:
4034:
methods of browsing to be available to the reader and editor - the alphabetical index of a selected grouping of categories, plus
2383:
2289:
17:
3959:
3955:
3338:
be diffused into sub-cats, just ones in which this template is applied. And one can always discuss on the related talk page. -
1108:
matter currently covered by prominent news source(s)." After reflecting I've decided this template isn't really different than
3705:
3516:
Having large categories divided into small, specific categories is one of the strengths of the category system, in my view. --
3593:
1003:
963:
705:
533:
4616:
1327:
3709:
3370:
has one and needs one; most articles in that category should be diffused into subcategories. However, I agree with some
781:
4260:. I concur. The template also could be percieved as an POV since it only covers browsers which are currently updated. --
3778:
855:
826:
591:
100:
3536:(among other things), is that a lot of people put articles in the first potentially relevant category they run across,
2561:
template which is a much better version of the license you are describing. As for the PD v. Free use issue, please see
1375:
541:
524:
486:
167:
3827:, by himself. So Banda is not now grouped with anyone else, so I don't find any similar articles. Another example is
3609:
3142:
2499:
2476:
2374:
2336:
1248:
886:
4607:
4558:
1616:
1318:
1280:
4754:
4624:
4228:). Aside from contributing to the template-crustification of web browser articles, what purpose does this serve? --
1335:
772:
734:
4392:
4196:
3110:
2599:
so that they can be deleted as well, and, if this template is not deleted, do not use it like this in the future.
1204:
1082:
789:
645:
175:
112:
4804:
4786:
4738:
4671:
4648:
4600:
4533:
4510:
4478:
4462:
4399:
4379:
4363:
4345:
4325:
4313:
4296:
4274:
4252:
4232:
4180:
4120:
4089:
4066:
4042:
4024:
4015:
3966:
3933:
3915:
3901:
3884:
3866:
3835:
3802:
3789:
3768:
3745:
3725:
3716:
3694:
3579:
3557:
3545:
3520:
3508:
3504:
wrt to the bolded part of the introduction, I like to be able to look for articles in small and sharp categories.
3496:
3484:
3463:
3443:
3433:
3421:
3408:
3378:
3356:
3342:
3318:
3293:
3272:
3258:
3231:
3215:
3201:
3180:
3166:
3149:
3127:
3117:
3095:
3060:
2982:
2967:
2954:
2933:
2859:
2803:
2780:
2771:
2750:
2724:
2704:
2666:
2631:
2623:
Nice to meet you too. Noncommercial licensed images, regardless of what boilerplate may be put on the page, meet
2615:
2603:
2569:
2546:
2529:
2490:
2464:
2446:
2367:
2311:
2293:
2270:
2256:
2240:
2214:
2044:
1990:
1977:
1957:
1939:
1925:
1900:
1878:
1862:
1844:
1811:
1788:
1775:
1752:
1739:
1730:
1719:
1697:
1679:
1650:
1600:
1544:
1525:
1496:
1464:
1448:
1434:
1416:
1393:
1365:
1311:
1255:
1195:
1145:
1132:
1066:
1007:
980:
941:
922:
904:
873:
857:
828:
765:
709:
686:
663:
636:
622:
613:
593:
517:
463:
440:
401:
386:
366:
305:
249:
226:
209:
158:
60:
4819:
4712:
4686:
4574:
4548:
4440:
4414:
4160:
4134:
3996:
3700:
3671:
3089:
2906:
2844:
2818:
2690:
2555:
2412:
2352:
2326:
2153:
2110:
2029:
2005:
1805:
1769:
1673:
1585:
1559:
1296:
1270:
1231:
1046:
1020:
750:
724:
502:
476:
290:
264:
130:
118:
76:
4818:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4711:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4685:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4573:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4547:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4413:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4159:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4133:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
2843:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
2817:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
2351:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
2325:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
2028:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
2004:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1584:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1558:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1295:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1269:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1221:
1211:
1045:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
1019:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
749:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
723:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
501:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
475:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
289:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
263:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
75:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
4745:
4696:
3828:
3820:
3812:
3795:
3761:
3756:
3588:
better served by filing people in the narrowest appropriate category rather than the general parent. There's a
3313:
3159:
2875:
2391:
2067:
1949:- People are getting all upset because this has a swear word. It's really just the hispanophone equivalent of
1936:
1859:
1167:
1157:
106:
3332:
situation. This one is for the specific situations described within it. This doesn't mean that every category
1073:
1030:
4469:
4424:
4762:
3529:
2144:
2136:
2101:
2093:
1921:
1412:
682:
459:
245:
124:
3999:. I've now done this for earthquakes, just to actually get something done instead of talking about it. See
3712:? Are these more useful categories for browsing than their parent categories? I don't think they are. --
2222:
1624:
1241:
1090:
4486:
4176:
4118:
4020:
I apologise and withdraw the accusation. I still believe focused subcategories are more generally useful.
3375:
3073:
Question: What's the use of sub-categorzing if everything's at the main category? We might as well delete
2593:
2058:
2050:
1712:
1607:
1569:
1062:
321:
1965:- the language is non-existent; we wouldn't keep a Babal-box for Intermediate Martian speakers would we?
4229:
4225:
4187:
4144:
2161:
2118:
4204:
3113:, which is always being replenished with new articles, when it should ideally contain only categories.
2229:
2203:
2075:
4388:
4081:
4000:
3823:
on his page and someone else removed it - I found a citation for this and put him back). He's now in
3079:
2902:
2627:. Please don't expect to receive any warning about media not appropriately licensed being deleted.
2309:
2285:
1890:
languange very informal but could be kept by a user if someone really wants it for his own userpage.
1795:
1759:
1663:
1461:
1389:
951:
838:
2883:
1362:
4270:
4266:
3951:
3308:
3282:
3137:
For the love of mike, keep. This template helps me maintain some semblance of sanity when managing
2951:
2866:
2828:
2578:
2519:
2509:
2422:
2253:
1428:
and the individual chapter articles created already within this template should be deleted also. --
1736:
1716:
1688:
1163:
already addresses those concerns. However, for accuracy I'd recommend pluralizing the language of
1129:
566:). I since removed the stub cat association and listed it here. This is a non-standard usage of
4272:
4268:
4264:
3713:
3641:
need regular monitoring for cleanup of this type, and I find it rather tiresome that some people
3430:
3390:
3371:
3367:
3353:
3255:
3212:
3163:
3124:
3057:
2964:
2930:
2196:
2186:
1950:
1708:
1473:
1192:
999:
959:
898:
701:
657:
599:
Out of curiousity and the desire to make an informed vote, is it problematic to have nonstandard
4321:. Template serves no useful purpose that can't be better covered by a category or list article.
3862:
Knowledge article, and we should encourage contributors to add such information when possible.
1504:- I was about to speedily delete this template, as it now consists solely of a few redirects to
1457:
1425:
1384:
4705:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
4567:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
4433:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
4153:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
2837:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
2408:
This template has been officially deprecated since February of last year. It is redundant with
2345:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
2022:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
1578:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
1289:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
1039:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
743:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
495:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
329:
283:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
69:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
4797:
4306:
4172:
4115:
4038:
subcategorisation schemes? There is no need to force people into choosing one over the other.
3575:
3479:
3401:
2720:
2457:
1540:
1058:
934:
603:
570:
219:
3977:
By the way, if a reader, and not an editor, had asked you this question, would you have said
3285:, but people do that regularly. Not because it's expected or logical, but because they don't
4661:
4523:
4286:
3679:
3597:
3228:
2960:
2950:) where it's quite appropriate. Deletion is an unnecessarily blunt instrument to use here.
2947:
2943:
2589:, please tag any other images that are actually licensed under a noncommercial license with
2432:
1971:
1966:
1185:
1122:
1112:
850:
821:
810:
586:
94:
3123:
navigation category that would hold the subcategories currently in "Australian people". --
1780:
No. It is slang for vagina. Generally used to express anger, contempt or similar emotions.
4376:
4338:
4086:
4063:
4039:
4021:
4012:
4008:
3980:
3963:
3941:
3930:
3912:
3898:
3755:- I agree with SW on these matters, and also on leaving duplicate categories on occasion.
3626:
3554:
3440:
3418:
3269:
3177:
2302:
2280:
1917:
1519:
1408:
919:
678:
455:
430:
420:
398:
363:
359:
312:
274:
241:
4241:. The category should include these articles and only these articles, so I see no use. -
4783:
4645:
4507:
4342:
3816:
3742:
3630:
3533:
3264:
3198:
3194:
3035:
3006:
2266:
2250:
2179:
1429:
376:
351:
4734:
4725:
4666:
4658:
4596:
4587:
4528:
4520:
4458:
4360:
4291:
4283:
4261:
3799:
3722:
3517:
3505:
3460:
3031:
2913:
2799:
2768:
2747:
1892:
1837:
1781:
1745:
1657:
1644:, the "language" Konyo/Coño does not exist in ISO 639 and en-cñ is an invented code.
1505:
1142:
995:
977:
955:
893:
870:
697:
652:
633:
619:
610:
559:
206:
147:
562:
due to -stub- being in the name and it had been feeding into a stub cat (discussion
4800:
4396:
4322:
4309:
4242:
3863:
3691:
3566:
3542:
3472:
3404:
3290:
2979:
2922:
2856:
2777:
2716:
2697:
2566:
2526:
2460:
2443:
2364:
2041:
1987:
1725:
1692:
1645:
1597:
1535:
1308:
1252:
937:
762:
514:
437:
383:
302:
222:
1251:
might have been allowed to overgrow, this is not one that should go in my opinion.
3650:
the time to start imposing an as-broad-as-possible categorization scheme that is
3938:
Yes, in fact I can, but I'll need a clarification of the question. Answer me why
3881:
3832:
3786:
3765:
3658:. And furthermore, the use of general parents as "index" categories effectively
3493:
3146:
3114:
2734:: Far too often, "copyrighted free use" is interpreted as meaning "the image is
2701:
2628:
2600:
845:
816:
581:
89:
4371:- templates and catagories have different uses, this template is appropriate --
4372:
2663:
2612:
2586:
2582:
2543:
2487:
1954:
1913:
1875:
1510:
1445:
1404:
1207:, which was the original location. It certainly seems far more pertinent than
915:
674:
451:
237:
193:
3339:
3637:
too broadly to be of any real encyclopedic value. A lot of categories thus
2585:
had tagged with this template but written was only for noncommercial use.
2657:
Read your own link, they can only be speedy deleted if they were uploaded
4729:
4591:
4453:
4055:
3366:- The template is useful for marking populous, overly-braod categories.
2919:
What articles will people be looking for and where will they look for it?
142:
3616:
how categorization is normally applied on here. There is, for instance,
4334:
4059:
4051:
1909:
2442:
for more info. I will be very glad to finally see this template go. --
405:
bravely avoiding the temptation to use a quote template to quote that)
1757:
Off-topic question: Does it have anything to do with being rich? --
3798:
was left in isolation far less people would be likely to find it.
976:
stay, over the objections of the community, doesn't look good. --
372:
What's the difference between Lquote and Cquote? Just the use of
4812:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
4679:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
4541:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
4407:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
4127:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
3783:
Category:Anti-communists whose nationality is open to some doubt
3654:
effective or valuable when coupled with a technical change that
3042:
and when that happens, we should not diffuse the index category.
2811:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2515:, so if we were to redirect, I would prefer that we redirect to
2319:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1998:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1552:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1263:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1013:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
717:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
469:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
257:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
192:
This is out of contect nonsense. Probably created in error. --
3553:
This template encourages people to make necessary refinements.
3307:
per above, but do something about the ugly lime green color. —
1793:
Ah, ok. (You may remove this conversation if you'd want to.) --
3911:
manageable, but more useful. Unmanageable data is just noise.
3958:. Do you want earthquakes that hit the place where you live?
3612:
get thrown entirely too far up the tree by editors who don't
4506:— Template is completely unused and no edits were ever made
3785:. (There is a glaring lack of any Belgian anti-communists.)
3254:
even if they can also be found in smaller subcategories. --
1352:
This was nominated for deletion a month ago to no consensus
1173:, so that it reads "This article is related to current event
3328:- A template doesn't have to be designed to be useful for
3056:
category which has articles that are miscategorized. --
2228:, a redirect to Srbox piece, should be deleted as well.
892:
or similar, to make it clear it is not a stub template.
651:
or similar, to make it clear it is not a stub template.
4770:
4766:
4758:
4750:
4632:
4628:
4620:
4612:
4494:
4490:
4482:
4474:
4212:
4208:
4200:
4192:
4004:
3289:
about the more specific and more appropriate category.
2891:
2887:
2879:
2871:
2399:
2395:
2387:
2379:
2169:
2165:
2157:
2149:
2126:
2122:
2114:
2106:
2083:
2079:
2071:
2063:
1632:
1628:
1620:
1612:
1343:
1339:
1331:
1323:
1098:
1094:
1086:
1078:
797:
793:
785:
777:
549:
545:
537:
529:
391:
337:
333:
325:
317:
183:
179:
171:
163:
3052:
doesn't help. So the template is not appropriate for
1374:. Local chapter articles should be the exception (see
3277:
No, they generally get silted up by people who don't
1912:. The creator should be warned, unless I'm mistaken.
882:
Keep, but would be better it its name was changed to
641:
Keep, but would be better it its name was changed to
3737:. The acid test has to be how useful a category is
4715:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4577:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4443:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4163:). No further edits should be made to this page.
3154:I'm not convinced that this template is helpful in
2847:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2355:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2032:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1588:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1299:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1049:). No further edits should be made to this page.
753:). No further edits should be made to this page.
505:). No further edits should be made to this page.
358:- it took a great deal of effort to take it out of
293:). No further edits should be made to this page.
79:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4387:. We already have enough lists of web browsers in
1724:Perhaps you could propose for them to be deleted?
1378:) rather than the rule. Accordingly I've added a
1361:non-notable outside the national organization. --
4822:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4689:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4551:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4417:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4137:). No further edits should be made to this page.
3001:This conversation is currently also underway at
2821:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2329:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2008:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1562:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1273:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1181:progress." Then editors could be advised to use
1023:). No further edits should be made to this page.
727:). No further edits should be made to this page.
479:). No further edits should be made to this page.
356:Knowledge:WikiProject Usability/Clickable images
267:). No further edits should be made to this page.
3987:a list of all the earthquake articles we have?"
2178:These templates were used in the early days of
1691:should be the one to host this as its creator.
3250:all the battles of the Civil war should be in
4304:. This is more suitable as a list article.
3858:require human intervention and expertise for
8:
3849:fix to the software which can be applied to
3399:fashion, probably could use a better home.
4224:as redundant, given the pre-existing cats (
3528:My impression, as one of the patrollers of
3263:It may be your natural inclination to have
2978:guess if and when it will actually appear.
354:. The problem with that is as described in
3815:because there was a dispute about whether
3252:Category:Battles of the American Civil War
2992:while leaving the original category alone.
1735:I’m all neutral on this issue, what for? —
806:As above, this is a non-standard usage of
618:Still waiting for a response to this... --
3005:. I'm proposing that we should populate
2767:, rather than this specific deletion. --
1177:. Information may change rapidly as event
436:are more flexible and are widely used. --
4782:— /doc page, base templates was deleted
4644:— /doc page, base templates was deleted
3706:Category:Poetry writers from Nova Scotia
3678:a useful reason to also add somebody to
2505:is actually in discussion to merge into
2738:, I was able to get my hands on it for
396:(cquote except keep it left-justified;)
3606:Category:British television presenters
2625:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
629:As per What I said on the other Page,
3156:Category:History of the United States
3139:Category:History of the United States
7:
3268:parent category, albeit indirectly.
1153:because the wording is awkward, and
3710:Category:1967 American comedy films
2912:There is absolutely nothing in the
866:Agian as I said on the other Page,
346:Not used. More importantly, one of
3779:Category:Stateless anti-communists
3417:judgement of this fellow editors.
3395:certainly related to Microsoft in
1356:. However, present discussion at
28:
4724:as uncontroversial housekeeping (
4586:as uncontroversial housekeeping (
3825:Category:Malawian anti-communists
3682:at the same time. So until CI is
1661:. I'll volunteer to host this. --
578:Knowledge:WikiProject Sailor Moon
525:Template:Sailor-Moon-stub-section
487:Template:Sailor-Moon-stub-section
4003:. The edits involved are listed
1715:, etc. using unofficial codes? —
18:Knowledge:Templates for deletion
4608:Template:Tnavbar-mini-nodiv/doc
4559:Template:Tnavbar-mini-nodiv/doc
3960:Category:Earthquakes by country
3956:Category:Earthquakes by century
1319:Template:Beta Theta Pi Chapters
1281:Template:Beta Theta Pi Chapters
844:(I must have missed the move).
4168:The result of the debate was
3811:Let me explain. I came across
3594:Category:Television presenters
3109:This template is necessary on
1744:Coño is a Spanish swear word.
1054:The result of the debate was
773:Template:Sailor-Moon-stub-List
735:Template:Sailor-Moon-stub-List
1:
4720:The result of the debate was
4582:The result of the debate was
4448:The result of the debate was
3604:belong in subcategories like
3592:need to clean up things like
2852:The result of the debate was
2360:The result of the debate was
2037:The result of the debate was
1593:The result of the debate was
1304:The result of the debate was
758:The result of the debate was
510:The result of the debate was
298:The result of the debate was
84:The result of the debate was
59:
30:
4739:10:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
4601:10:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
4463:10:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
4181:23:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
4121:21:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
4090:17:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
4067:17:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
4043:16:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
4025:16:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
4016:15:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
3967:15:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
3934:14:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
3916:14:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
3902:02:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
3197:04:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2860:03:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
2368:03:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
2045:02:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1991:23:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
1978:18:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
1601:02:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1545:19:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
1526:15:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
1312:02:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
1256:00:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
1067:23:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
766:02:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
518:02:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
306:02:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
159:Template:Cap'n Truman Cloggs
152:10:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
61:Template:Cap'n Truman Cloggs
4805:15:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4787:02:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4672:08:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4649:02:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4534:08:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4511:02:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4400:17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
4380:21:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
4364:08:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
4346:01:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
4326:22:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4314:11:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4297:08:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4275:07:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4253:04:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4233:01:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3885:15:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3867:14:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3836:14:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3803:13:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3790:10:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3769:10:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3746:00:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3726:12:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3717:07:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
3695:01:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
3633:, for instance, is defined
3610:Category:American novelists
3580:12:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
3558:06:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
3546:01:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
3521:22:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
3509:07:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
3497:04:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
3485:00:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
3464:21:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3444:07:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
3434:02:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
3422:14:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3409:11:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3379:10:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3357:07:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3343:07:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3319:05:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3294:22:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
3273:14:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3259:07:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3232:04:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3216:07:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3202:04:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3181:14:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3167:07:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3150:03:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3143:Category:American Civil War
3128:06:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3118:02:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3096:11:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
3061:06:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2983:02:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2968:06:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2955:02:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2934:02:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2929:Thanks for reading this. --
2804:12:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2781:07:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2772:06:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2751:00:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2725:23:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
2705:22:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
2700:for this big cleanup job!
2667:04:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2632:03:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2616:03:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2604:00:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2570:22:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
2547:00:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
2530:21:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
2491:02:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
2465:11:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2447:05:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2375:Template:CopyrightedFreeUse
2337:Template:CopyrightedFreeUse
2312:02:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
2294:01:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
2271:20:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2257:15:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2241:06:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
2215:06:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1958:20:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
1940:08:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
1926:04:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
1901:04:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
1879:03:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1863:02:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1845:16:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1812:03:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1789:23:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1776:17:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1753:16:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1740:13:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1731:13:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1720:12:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1707:other templates linking to
1698:11:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1680:11:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1651:08:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1497:13:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
1465:02:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
1449:19:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
1435:06:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
1417:04:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
1394:22:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
1366:14:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1358:Administrators' Noticeboard
1249:Category:Temporal templates
1196:19:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1146:07:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1133:15:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
1008:22:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
981:06:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
942:22:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
923:21:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
905:04:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
874:03:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
871:Lego3400: The Sage of Time
858:18:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
829:18:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
710:22:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
687:04:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
664:04:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
637:03:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
634:Lego3400: The Sage of Time
623:19:10, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
614:18:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
594:18:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
558:I had first listed this at
464:04:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
441:18:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
402:15:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
387:21:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
367:20:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
250:04:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
227:22:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
210:22:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
197:22:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
4839:
4393:Comparison of web browsers
3764:, not a list of subcats.
3111:Category:Australian people
2797:large number of people. -
2301:per above - deprecated •
1205:Template talk:Current news
217:; this is not a template.
4746:Template:Tnavbar-mini/doc
4697:Template:Tnavbar-mini/doc
3997:Category:School massacres
3701:Category:Canadian writers
3672:Category:Canadian writers
2914:Categorization guidelines
2905:}} and huge categories {{
914:- no problem with this --
4815:Please do not modify it.
4708:Please do not modify it.
4682:Please do not modify it.
4570:Please do not modify it.
4544:Please do not modify it.
4436:Please do not modify it.
4410:Please do not modify it.
4156:Please do not modify it.
4130:Please do not modify it.
3979:"Answer me why, besides
3829:Category:Malawian people
3821:Category:Anti-communists
3813:Category:Anti-communists
3796:Category:Anti-communists
3762:Category:Anti-communists
3757:Category:Anti-communists
3160:Knowledge:Category types
2840:Please do not modify it.
2814:Please do not modify it.
2348:Please do not modify it.
2322:Please do not modify it.
2025:Please do not modify it.
2001:Please do not modify it.
1581:Please do not modify it.
1555:Please do not modify it.
1292:Please do not modify it.
1266:Please do not modify it.
1074:Template:Current subject
1042:Please do not modify it.
1031:Template:Current subject
1016:Please do not modify it.
746:Please do not modify it.
720:Please do not modify it.
498:Please do not modify it.
472:Please do not modify it.
286:Please do not modify it.
260:Please do not modify it.
72:Please do not modify it.
4470:Template:Tnavbar-portal
4425:Template:Tnavbar-portal
3530:category:food and drink
2418:and to a lesser extent
2249:superseded templates. —
887:Sailor Moon expand list
3699:Have you noticed that
2923:category intersections
2696:. Congratulations to
2145:Template:Srbox piece 3
2137:Template:Srbox piece 3
2102:Template:Srbox piece 2
2094:Template:Srbox piece 2
4795:, purely procedural.
4226:Category:Web browsers
4188:Template:Web browsers
4145:Template:Web browsers
3819:was one (someone put
3040:below the index level
4389:List of web browsers
4082:Category:Earthquakes
4001:Category:Earthquakes
2579:Image:Blanik 3 a.jpg
2059:Template:Srbox piece
2051:Template:Srbox piece
646:Sailor Moon sectstub
392:The creation comment
4011:accusations about.
3952:List of earthquakes
3656:hasn't happened yet
3600:, where people who
3283:Category:Literature
2867:Template:CatDiffuse
2829:Template:CatDiffuse
2551:There is already a
1608:Template:User_en-cñ
1570:Template:User_en-cñ
1247:). Actually, while
609:-like templates? --
3662:the point of even
3584:Categorization is
3391:Category:Microsoft
3368:Category:Astronomy
2500:No rights reserved
2482:(first choice) or
2477:No rights reserved
2306:
2264:per nom and Scott
1951:Template:User_en-B
1232:Future sport event
348:the only remaining
4670:
4532:
4295:
4251:
4179:
3990:
3483:
3376:Dr. Submillimeter
3317:
3077:subcategories. --
3003:WikiProject Films
2686:. Superceded by
2304:
1543:
1524:
1354:(discussion here)
1222:Future TV channel
1212:Future UK channel
1065:
968:
954:comment added by
901:
660:
406:
51:
50:
4830:
4817:
4803:
4775:
4774:
4710:
4684:
4669:
4664:
4637:
4636:
4572:
4546:
4531:
4526:
4499:
4498:
4438:
4412:
4312:
4294:
4289:
4245:
4230:AlistairMcMillan
4217:
4216:
4175:
4158:
4132:
3976:
3680:Category:Writers
3598:Category:Writers
3573:
3565:per many above.
3477:
3407:
3311:
3092:
3087:
3082:
2961:Category:Science
2948:Category:Science
2944:Category:History
2907:LargeCategoryTOC
2896:
2895:
2842:
2816:
2742:, and I want to
2723:
2695:
2691:NoRightsReserved
2689:
2598:
2592:
2560:
2556:NoRightsReserved
2554:
2542:non-Wikipedian.
2524:
2518:
2514:
2508:
2504:
2498:
2481:
2475:
2463:
2437:
2431:
2427:
2421:
2417:
2413:NoRightsReserved
2411:
2404:
2403:
2350:
2324:
2307:
2236:
2233:
2227:
2221:
2210:
2207:
2201:
2195:
2191:
2185:
2174:
2173:
2131:
2130:
2088:
2087:
2027:
2003:
1974:
1969:
1899:
1897:
1842:
1808:
1803:
1798:
1786:
1772:
1767:
1762:
1750:
1728:
1695:
1676:
1671:
1666:
1648:
1637:
1636:
1583:
1557:
1539:
1522:
1518:
1513:
1493:
1491:
1489:
1487:
1485:
1432:
1348:
1347:
1294:
1268:
1246:
1240:
1236:
1230:
1226:
1220:
1216:
1210:
1190:
1184:
1172:
1166:
1162:
1156:
1127:
1121:
1117:
1111:
1103:
1102:
1061:
1044:
1018:
994:per Grutness. —
967:
948:
940:
899:
891:
885:
853:
843:
837:
824:
815:
809:
802:
801:
748:
722:
696:per Grutness. —
673:before keeping.
658:
650:
644:
608:
602:
589:
575:
569:
554:
553:
500:
474:
435:
429:
425:
419:
404:
381:
375:
350:templates using
342:
341:
288:
262:
225:
188:
187:
140:
74:
47:
36:
31:
4838:
4837:
4833:
4832:
4831:
4829:
4828:
4827:
4826:
4820:deletion review
4813:
4796:
4748:
4744:
4713:deletion review
4706:
4700:
4693:
4687:deletion review
4680:
4662:
4610:
4606:
4575:deletion review
4568:
4562:
4555:
4549:deletion review
4542:
4524:
4472:
4468:
4441:deletion review
4434:
4428:
4421:
4415:deletion review
4408:
4339:Opera (browser)
4305:
4287:
4250:
4190:
4186:
4177:(Упражнение В!)
4161:deletion review
4154:
4148:
4141:
4135:deletion review
4128:
3627:Margaret Atwood
3567:
3538:without looking
3400:
3090:
3085:
3080:
2869:
2865:
2845:deletion review
2838:
2832:
2825:
2819:deletion review
2812:
2719:
2693:
2687:
2596:
2590:
2577:I just deleted
2563:this discussion
2558:
2552:
2522:
2516:
2512:
2506:
2502:
2496:
2479:
2473:
2456:
2435:
2429:
2425:
2419:
2415:
2409:
2377:
2373:
2353:deletion review
2346:
2340:
2333:
2327:deletion review
2320:
2303:
2278:per above/. ---
2234:
2231:
2225:
2219:
2208:
2205:
2199:
2193:
2189:
2183:
2147:
2143:
2140:
2104:
2100:
2097:
2061:
2057:
2054:
2030:deletion review
2023:
2017:
2012:
2006:deletion review
1999:
1972:
1967:
1893:
1891:
1838:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1782:
1770:
1765:
1760:
1746:
1726:
1693:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1646:
1610:
1606:
1586:deletion review
1579:
1573:
1566:
1560:deletion review
1553:
1520:
1511:
1483:
1481:
1479:
1477:
1475:
1462:ImmortalGoddezz
1430:
1321:
1317:
1297:deletion review
1290:
1284:
1277:
1271:deletion review
1264:
1244:
1238:
1234:
1228:
1224:
1218:
1214:
1208:
1188:
1182:
1170:
1168:current-related
1164:
1160:
1158:current-related
1154:
1125:
1119:
1115:
1109:
1076:
1072:
1063:(Упражнение В!)
1047:deletion review
1040:
1034:
1027:
1021:deletion review
1014:
949:
933:
889:
883:
851:
841:
835:
822:
813:
807:
775:
771:
751:deletion review
744:
738:
731:
725:deletion review
718:
648:
642:
606:
600:
587:
573:
567:
527:
523:
503:deletion review
496:
490:
483:
477:deletion review
470:
433:
427:
423:
417:
379:
373:
360:Template:Cquote
315:
313:Template:Lquote
311:
291:deletion review
284:
278:
275:Template:Lquote
271:
265:deletion review
258:
218:
161:
157:
92:
77:deletion review
70:
64:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
4836:
4834:
4825:
4824:
4808:
4807:
4780:House cleaning
4777:
4776:
4718:
4717:
4701:
4699:
4694:
4692:
4691:
4675:
4674:
4642:House cleaning
4639:
4638:
4580:
4579:
4563:
4561:
4556:
4554:
4553:
4537:
4536:
4504:House cleaning
4501:
4500:
4446:
4445:
4429:
4427:
4422:
4420:
4419:
4403:
4402:
4382:
4366:
4354:
4348:
4328:
4316:
4299:
4277:
4255:
4246:
4219:
4218:
4166:
4165:
4149:
4147:
4142:
4140:
4139:
4109:
4108:
4107:
4106:
4105:
4104:
4103:
4102:
4101:
4100:
4099:
4098:
4097:
4096:
4095:
4094:
4093:
4092:
3929:Intersection.
3919:
3918:
3892:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3888:
3887:
3872:
3871:
3870:
3869:
3841:
3840:
3839:
3838:
3817:Hastings Banda
3806:
3805:
3792:
3772:
3771:
3749:
3748:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3714:Samuel Wantman
3631:Hamzah Fansuri
3582:
3560:
3548:
3534:category:foods
3523:
3511:
3499:
3487:
3466:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3446:
3431:Samuel Wantman
3425:
3424:
3411:
3382:
3381:
3372:Samuel Wantman
3360:
3359:
3354:Samuel Wantman
3346:
3345:
3322:
3321:
3309:Ilmari Karonen
3301:
3300:
3299:
3298:
3297:
3296:
3275:
3265:Category:Films
3256:Samuel Wantman
3235:
3234:
3221:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3213:Samuel Wantman
3205:
3204:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3170:
3169:
3164:Samuel Wantman
3132:
3131:
3130:
3125:Samuel Wantman
3103:
3102:
3101:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3058:Samuel Wantman
3046:
3045:
3044:
3043:
3036:Category:Films
3024:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3014:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3007:Category:Films
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2986:
2985:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2965:Samuel Wantman
2952:Kirill Lokshin
2931:Samuel Wantman
2898:
2897:
2850:
2849:
2833:
2831:
2826:
2824:
2823:
2807:
2806:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2754:
2753:
2728:
2727:
2708:
2707:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2572:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2467:
2406:
2405:
2358:
2357:
2341:
2339:
2334:
2332:
2331:
2315:
2314:
2296:
2273:
2259:
2176:
2175:
2139:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2096:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2053:
2048:
2035:
2034:
2018:
2016:
2013:
2011:
2010:
1994:
1993:
1981:
1980:
1960:
1943:
1942:
1929:
1928:
1903:
1881:
1865:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1702:Nah, we could
1639:
1638:
1591:
1590:
1574:
1572:
1567:
1565:
1564:
1548:
1547:
1528:
1499:
1467:
1456:- per nom and
1451:
1438:
1437:
1419:
1397:
1396:
1350:
1349:
1302:
1301:
1285:
1283:
1278:
1276:
1275:
1259:
1258:
1198:
1148:
1105:
1104:
1052:
1051:
1035:
1033:
1028:
1026:
1025:
1010:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
926:
925:
908:
907:
879:
878:
877:
876:
861:
860:
804:
803:
756:
755:
739:
737:
732:
730:
729:
713:
712:
690:
689:
667:
666:
639:
627:
626:
625:
556:
555:
508:
507:
491:
489:
484:
482:
481:
466:
444:
443:
410:
409:
408:
407:
352:Template:click
344:
343:
296:
295:
279:
277:
272:
270:
269:
253:
252:
230:
229:
212:
190:
189:
82:
81:
65:
63:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4835:
4823:
4821:
4816:
4810:
4809:
4806:
4802:
4799:
4794:
4793:Speedy Delete
4791:
4790:
4789:
4788:
4785:
4781:
4772:
4768:
4764:
4760:
4756:
4752:
4747:
4743:
4742:
4741:
4740:
4737:
4736:
4731:
4727:
4723:
4722:speedy delete
4716:
4714:
4709:
4703:
4702:
4698:
4695:
4690:
4688:
4683:
4677:
4676:
4673:
4668:
4665:
4660:
4656:
4655:Speedy Delete
4653:
4652:
4651:
4650:
4647:
4643:
4634:
4630:
4626:
4622:
4618:
4614:
4609:
4605:
4604:
4603:
4602:
4599:
4598:
4593:
4589:
4585:
4584:speedy delete
4578:
4576:
4571:
4565:
4564:
4560:
4557:
4552:
4550:
4545:
4539:
4538:
4535:
4530:
4527:
4522:
4518:
4517:Speedy Delete
4515:
4514:
4513:
4512:
4509:
4505:
4496:
4492:
4488:
4484:
4480:
4476:
4471:
4467:
4466:
4465:
4464:
4461:
4460:
4455:
4451:
4444:
4442:
4437:
4431:
4430:
4426:
4423:
4418:
4416:
4411:
4405:
4404:
4401:
4398:
4394:
4390:
4386:
4383:
4381:
4378:
4374:
4370:
4367:
4365:
4362:
4358:
4355:
4352:
4349:
4347:
4344:
4340:
4336:
4332:
4329:
4327:
4324:
4320:
4317:
4315:
4311:
4308:
4303:
4300:
4298:
4293:
4290:
4285:
4281:
4278:
4276:
4273:
4271:
4269:
4267:
4265:
4263:
4259:
4256:
4254:
4249:
4244:
4240:
4237:
4236:
4235:
4234:
4231:
4227:
4223:
4214:
4210:
4206:
4202:
4198:
4194:
4189:
4185:
4184:
4183:
4182:
4178:
4174:
4171:
4164:
4162:
4157:
4151:
4150:
4146:
4143:
4138:
4136:
4131:
4125:
4124:
4123:
4122:
4119:
4117:
4113:
4091:
4088:
4083:
4079:
4074:
4070:
4069:
4068:
4065:
4061:
4057:
4053:
4048:
4047:
4046:
4045:
4044:
4041:
4037:
4033:
4028:
4027:
4026:
4023:
4019:
4018:
4017:
4014:
4010:
4006:
4002:
3998:
3994:
3988:
3984:
3982:
3974:
3970:
3969:
3968:
3965:
3961:
3957:
3953:
3949:
3945:
3943:
3937:
3936:
3935:
3932:
3927:
3926:Category Scan
3923:
3922:
3921:
3920:
3917:
3914:
3909:
3906:
3905:
3904:
3903:
3900:
3896:
3886:
3883:
3878:
3877:
3876:
3875:
3874:
3873:
3868:
3865:
3861:
3857:
3852:
3848:
3843:
3842:
3837:
3834:
3830:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3814:
3810:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3804:
3801:
3797:
3793:
3791:
3788:
3784:
3781:and possibly
3780:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3773:
3770:
3767:
3763:
3758:
3754:
3751:
3750:
3747:
3744:
3740:
3739:to the reader
3736:
3733:
3727:
3724:
3720:
3719:
3718:
3715:
3711:
3707:
3702:
3698:
3697:
3696:
3693:
3689:
3685:
3681:
3677:
3673:
3669:
3665:
3661:
3657:
3653:
3649:
3644:
3640:
3636:
3632:
3628:
3624:
3619:
3615:
3611:
3607:
3603:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3587:
3583:
3581:
3578:
3577:
3574:
3571:
3564:
3561:
3559:
3556:
3552:
3549:
3547:
3544:
3539:
3535:
3531:
3527:
3524:
3522:
3519:
3515:
3512:
3510:
3507:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3495:
3491:
3488:
3486:
3481:
3476:
3475:
3470:
3467:
3465:
3462:
3458:
3454:
3451:
3450:
3445:
3442:
3437:
3436:
3435:
3432:
3427:
3426:
3423:
3420:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3406:
3403:
3398:
3393:
3392:
3387:
3384:
3383:
3380:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3362:
3361:
3358:
3355:
3351:
3348:
3347:
3344:
3341:
3337:
3336:
3331:
3327:
3324:
3323:
3320:
3315:
3310:
3306:
3303:
3302:
3295:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3274:
3271:
3266:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3257:
3253:
3248:
3244:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3233:
3230:
3226:
3223:
3222:
3217:
3214:
3211:has been. --
3209:
3208:
3207:
3206:
3203:
3200:
3196:
3191:
3188:
3182:
3179:
3174:
3173:
3172:
3171:
3168:
3165:
3161:
3157:
3153:
3152:
3151:
3148:
3144:
3140:
3136:
3133:
3129:
3126:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3116:
3112:
3108:
3105:
3104:
3097:
3094:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3076:
3072:
3071:
3070:
3069:
3068:
3067:
3062:
3059:
3055:
3050:
3049:
3048:
3047:
3041:
3037:
3033:
3032:Category:Film
3028:
3027:
3026:
3025:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3015:
3008:
3004:
3000:
2999:
2998:
2997:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2984:
2981:
2976:
2973:
2969:
2966:
2962:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2953:
2949:
2945:
2941:
2938:
2937:
2936:
2935:
2932:
2927:
2924:
2920:
2915:
2910:
2908:
2904:
2893:
2889:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2868:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2861:
2858:
2855:
2848:
2846:
2841:
2835:
2834:
2830:
2827:
2822:
2820:
2815:
2809:
2808:
2805:
2802:
2801:
2796:
2791:
2788:
2787:
2782:
2779:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2770:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2755:
2752:
2749:
2745:
2741:
2737:
2733:
2730:
2729:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2713:
2710:
2709:
2706:
2703:
2699:
2692:
2685:
2682:
2681:
2668:
2665:
2660:
2656:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2633:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2614:
2610:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2602:
2595:
2594:noncommercial
2588:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2573:
2571:
2568:
2564:
2557:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2545:
2540:
2537:
2536:
2531:
2528:
2521:
2511:
2501:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2489:
2485:
2478:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2462:
2459:
2454:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2445:
2441:
2434:
2424:
2414:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2376:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2366:
2363:
2356:
2354:
2349:
2343:
2342:
2338:
2335:
2330:
2328:
2323:
2317:
2316:
2313:
2310:
2308:
2300:
2297:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2282:
2277:
2274:
2272:
2269:
2268:
2263:
2262:Strong delete
2260:
2258:
2255:
2252:
2248:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2239:
2238:
2224:
2217:
2216:
2213:
2212:
2198:
2188:
2181:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2146:
2142:
2141:
2138:
2135:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2103:
2099:
2098:
2095:
2092:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2060:
2056:
2055:
2052:
2049:
2047:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2033:
2031:
2026:
2020:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2007:
2002:
1996:
1995:
1992:
1989:
1985:
1982:
1979:
1976:
1975:
1970:
1964:
1961:
1959:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1945:
1944:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1904:
1902:
1898:
1896:
1889:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1866:
1864:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1835:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1804:
1799:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1774:
1773:
1768:
1763:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1729:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1696:
1690:
1686:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1649:
1643:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1609:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1599:
1596:
1589:
1587:
1582:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1568:
1563:
1561:
1556:
1550:
1549:
1546:
1542:
1537:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1523:
1517:
1514:
1507:
1506:Beta Theta Pi
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1440:
1439:
1436:
1433:
1431:† Ðy§ep§ion †
1427:
1423:
1420:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1386:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1359:
1355:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1310:
1307:
1300:
1298:
1293:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1279:
1274:
1272:
1267:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1243:
1233:
1223:
1213:
1206:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1193:Tobogganoggin
1187:
1180:
1176:
1169:
1159:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1131:
1124:
1114:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1057:
1050:
1048:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1024:
1022:
1017:
1011:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
990:
989:
982:
979:
975:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
945:
944:
943:
939:
936:
931:
928:
927:
924:
921:
917:
913:
910:
909:
906:
903:
902:
895:
888:
881:
880:
875:
872:
869:
865:
864:
863:
862:
859:
856:
854:
849:
848:
840:
833:
832:
831:
830:
827:
825:
820:
819:
812:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
774:
770:
769:
768:
767:
764:
761:
754:
752:
747:
741:
740:
736:
733:
728:
726:
721:
715:
714:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
692:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
669:
668:
665:
662:
661:
654:
647:
640:
638:
635:
632:
628:
624:
621:
617:
616:
615:
612:
605:
598:
597:
596:
595:
592:
590:
585:
584:
579:
572:
565:
561:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
526:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
513:
506:
504:
499:
493:
492:
488:
485:
480:
478:
473:
467:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
445:
442:
439:
432:
422:
415:
412:
411:
403:
400:
397:
393:
390:
389:
388:
385:
378:
371:
370:
369:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
310:
309:
308:
307:
304:
301:
294:
292:
287:
281:
280:
276:
273:
268:
266:
261:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:Speedy Delete
232:
231:
228:
224:
221:
216:
215:Speedy Delete
213:
211:
208:
204:
201:
200:
199:
198:
195:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
149:
144:
138:
135:
132:
129:
126:
123:
120:
117:
114:
111:
108:
105:
102:
99:
96:
91:
87:
86:speedy delete
80:
78:
73:
67:
66:
62:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
4814:
4811:
4792:
4779:
4778:
4733:
4721:
4719:
4707:
4704:
4681:
4678:
4654:
4641:
4640:
4595:
4583:
4581:
4569:
4566:
4543:
4540:
4516:
4503:
4502:
4457:
4449:
4447:
4435:
4432:
4409:
4406:
4384:
4368:
4356:
4350:
4330:
4318:
4301:
4279:
4257:
4238:
4221:
4220:
4173:RyanGerbil10
4169:
4167:
4155:
4152:
4129:
4126:
4116:Karl Dickman
4111:
4110:
4077:
4072:
4035:
4031:
3992:
3986:
3978:
3972:
3947:
3939:
3907:
3894:
3893:
3859:
3855:
3850:
3846:
3752:
3738:
3734:
3687:
3683:
3675:
3667:
3663:
3659:
3655:
3651:
3647:
3642:
3638:
3634:
3622:
3617:
3613:
3601:
3589:
3585:
3576:
3569:
3562:
3550:
3537:
3525:
3513:
3501:
3489:
3473:
3468:
3456:
3452:
3413:
3396:
3389:
3385:
3363:
3349:
3334:
3333:
3329:
3325:
3304:
3286:
3278:
3246:
3242:
3224:
3189:
3134:
3106:
3078:
3074:
3053:
3039:
2974:
2939:
2928:
2918:
2911:
2899:
2853:
2851:
2839:
2836:
2813:
2810:
2798:
2794:
2789:
2764:
2759:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2711:
2683:
2658:
2654:
2620:
2608:
2574:
2538:
2483:
2469:
2452:
2407:
2361:
2359:
2347:
2344:
2321:
2318:
2298:
2279:
2275:
2265:
2261:
2246:
2230:
2223:Sr box piece
2218:
2204:
2177:
2038:
2036:
2024:
2021:
2015:Srbox pieces
2000:
1997:
1983:
1962:
1946:
1932:
1905:
1894:
1887:
1883:
1871:
1867:
1855:
1851:
1839:
1833:
1832:
1794:
1783:
1758:
1747:
1703:
1687:: I believe
1684:
1662:
1656:
1641:
1640:
1594:
1592:
1580:
1577:
1554:
1551:
1530:
1515:
1501:
1474:
1472:, overkill.
1469:
1453:
1441:
1421:
1400:
1383:
1379:
1371:
1351:
1305:
1303:
1291:
1288:
1265:
1262:
1242:Future sport
1200:
1178:
1174:
1150:
1138:
1128:slightly? --
1106:
1059:RyanGerbil10
1055:
1053:
1041:
1038:
1015:
1012:
991:
973:
950:— Preceding
929:
911:
897:
867:
846:
817:
805:
760:no consensus
759:
757:
745:
742:
719:
716:
693:
670:
656:
630:
582:
557:
511:
509:
497:
494:
471:
468:
447:
413:
395:
345:
299:
297:
285:
282:
259:
256:
233:
214:
202:
191:
146:
133:
127:
121:
115:
109:
103:
97:
85:
83:
71:
68:
4353:per Amarkov
3971:Well, as a
3229:Herostratus
2903:CategoryTOC
2736:copyrighted
1908:Please see
1727:{ PMGOMEZ }
1694:{ PMGOMEZ }
1685:Re "Userfy"
1647:{ PMGOMEZ }
1203:legit. See
839:expand list
834:Or rather,
205:per nom. --
113:protections
4087:Carcharoth
4064:AnonEMouse
4040:Carcharoth
4022:AnonEMouse
4013:Carcharoth
3964:AnonEMouse
3940:, besides
3931:Carcharoth
3913:AnonEMouse
3899:Carcharoth
3882:roundhouse
3833:roundhouse
3787:roundhouse
3766:roundhouse
3686:in place,
3614:understand
3555:Cloachland
3441:Choalbaton
3419:Choalbaton
3270:Choalbaton
3178:Choalbaton
2520:PD-release
2510:PD-release
2423:PD-release
2305:master_son
2281:Rschen7754
399:AnonEMouse
364:AnonEMouse
125:page moves
4784:Dispenser
4646:Dispenser
4508:Dispenser
4359:per nom.
4343:Patstuart
4170:deletion.
3983:, do you
3743:Greenshed
3199:Chicheley
3195:Chicheley
2251:Scott5114
2197:ny browse
2187:ca browse
1403:per nom.
1363:Metros232
1141:per nom.
1056:deletion.
450:per all.
236:per nom.
119:deletions
55:January 4
43:January 5
38:January 3
4361:Wimstead
4262:LBMixPro
4056:Bhalgran
4009:WP:POINT
3981:WP:POINT
3942:WP:POINT
3800:Wimstead
3723:Wimstead
3684:actually
3674:, there
3660:vitiates
3643:continue
3602:actually
3590:constant
3518:Danaman5
3506:Wimstead
3461:SnowFire
2800:cohesion
2765:approach
2748:Carnildo
2581:, which
2470:Redirect
2290:contribs
1937:Chris S.
1895:KathzzZz
1860:Chris S.
1840:Asterion
1784:Asterion
1748:Asterion
1713:Runglish
1709:Hessisch
1380:See also
1376:Zeta Phi
1217:(versus
1143:Wimstead
996:CComMack
978:Masamage
964:contribs
956:Lego3400
952:unsigned
894:Grutness
847:~ Amalas
818:~ Amalas
698:CComMack
653:Grutness
620:Masamage
611:Masamage
604:sectstub
583:~ Amalas
571:sectstub
207:Danaman5
101:contribs
20: |
4759:history
4657:. NRV.
4621:history
4519:. NRV.
4483:history
4397:Schapel
4335:Firefox
4323:Kaldari
4282:. NRV.
4243:Amarkov
4201:history
4060:Butgram
4052:Balakot
3946:do you
3895:Comment
3864:Dr.frog
3692:Bearcat
3668:instead
3543:Dr.frog
3474:Gilliam
3457:logical
3350:Comment
3291:Bearcat
3279:realize
2980:Sumahoy
2880:history
2857:Circeus
2778:Kaldari
2746:it". --
2717:Sherool
2698:Kaldari
2655:Comment
2621:Comment
2609:Comment
2575:Comment
2567:Kaldari
2527:Kaldari
2444:Kaldari
2433:PD-self
2388:history
2365:Circeus
2180:WP:USRD
2158:history
2115:history
2072:history
2042:Circeus
1988:Ham let
1968:Anthony
1933:Comment
1850:Either
1737:Lagalag
1717:Lagalag
1689:Lagalag
1621:history
1598:Circeus
1536:delldot
1332:history
1309:Circeus
1253:Circeus
1186:current
1130:W.marsh
1123:current
1113:current
1087:history
811:listdev
786:history
763:Circeus
538:history
515:Circeus
438:surueña
384:Kaldari
326:history
303:Circeus
172:history
4801:Warren
4726:CSD G6
4659:Dfrg.m
4588:CSD G6
4521:Dfrg.m
4450:delete
4385:Delete
4357:Delete
4351:Delete
4319:Delete
4310:Warren
4302:Delete
4284:Dfrg.m
4280:Delete
4258:Delete
4239:Delete
4222:Delete
4112:Delete
4078:should
4036:useful
3993:editor
3991:As an
3973:reader
3753:Delete
3664:having
3586:always
3494:Hmains
3469:Delete
3405:Warren
3147:jengod
3115:ReeseM
3081:Howard
2790:Delete
2760:rarely
2732:Delete
2721:(talk)
2712:Delete
2702:Jkelly
2684:Delete
2629:Jkelly
2601:Jkelly
2495:Well,
2484:delete
2461:Warren
2453:Delete
2362:delete
2299:Delete
2276:Delete
2247:Delete
2039:delete
1984:Userfy
1963:Delete
1947:Userfy
1906:Delete
1888:userfy
1884:Delete
1872:userfy
1868:Delete
1856:userfy
1834:Userfy
1797:Howard
1761:Howard
1704:delete
1665:Howard
1658:Userfy
1642:Delete
1595:userfy
1531:Delete
1502:Delete
1470:Delete
1458:C.Fred
1454:Delete
1442:Delete
1426:C.Fred
1422:Delete
1401:Delete
1385:C.Fred
1372:Delete
1306:delete
1151:Delete
1139:Delete
992:Rename
938:Warren
694:Rename
671:Rework
560:WP:SFD
512:rename
448:Delete
431:Rquote
421:cquote
414:Delete
300:delete
223:Warren
203:Delete
131:rights
107:blocks
90:Angela
4767:watch
4763:links
4728:). —
4629:watch
4625:links
4590:). —
4491:watch
4487:links
4395:. --
4248:edits
4209:watch
4205:links
4058:, or
3851:every
3676:isn't
3526:Keep.
3514:Keep.
3330:every
3247:broad
3243:about
3225:Keep.
2888:watch
2884:links
2664:PPGMD
2659:after
2613:PPGMD
2587:PPGMD
2583:PPGMD
2544:PPGMD
2488:BigDT
2396:watch
2392:links
2166:watch
2162:links
2123:watch
2119:links
2080:watch
2076:links
1955:Dgies
1922:email
1914:Xiner
1876:BigDT
1629:watch
1625:links
1512:Proto
1476:: -->
1446:Dgies
1413:email
1405:Xiner
1340:watch
1336:links
1237:(vs.
1227:) or
1095:watch
1091:links
794:watch
790:links
683:email
675:Xiner
546:watch
542:links
460:email
452:Xiner
394:says
377:click
334:watch
330:links
246:email
238:Xiner
194:Obina
180:watch
176:links
46:: -->
16:<
4771:logs
4755:talk
4751:edit
4735:Talk
4633:logs
4617:talk
4613:edit
4597:Talk
4495:logs
4479:talk
4475:edit
4459:Talk
4452:. —
4391:and
4369:Keep
4337:and
4331:Keep
4213:logs
4197:talk
4193:edit
4073:that
4032:both
4005:here
3985:want
3948:want
3908:Keep
3860:each
3856:does
3735:Keep
3708:and
3688:keep
3652:only
3629:and
3568:The
3563:Keep
3551:Keep
3532:and
3502:Keep
3490:Keep
3480:talk
3453:Keep
3414:Keep
3397:some
3386:Keep
3364:Keep
3340:jc37
3335:must
3326:Keep
3314:talk
3305:Keep
3287:know
3190:Keep
3141:and
3135:Keep
3107:Keep
3091:Duck
3034:and
2975:Keep
2940:Keep
2892:logs
2876:talk
2872:edit
2854:keep
2795:very
2740:free
2539:Keep
2440:here
2400:logs
2384:talk
2380:edit
2286:talk
2170:logs
2154:talk
2150:edit
2127:logs
2111:talk
2107:edit
2084:logs
2068:talk
2064:edit
1918:talk
1910:Coño
1852:keep
1807:Duck
1771:Duck
1675:Duck
1633:logs
1617:talk
1613:edit
1541:talk
1492:<
1460:. --
1424:per
1409:talk
1390:talk
1344:logs
1328:talk
1324:edit
1201:Keep
1099:logs
1083:talk
1079:edit
974:must
960:talk
930:Keep
912:Keep
900:wha?
868:Keep
852:rawr
823:rawr
798:logs
782:talk
778:edit
679:talk
659:wha?
631:Keep
588:rawr
576:for
564:here
550:logs
534:talk
530:edit
456:talk
426:and
362:. --
338:logs
322:talk
318:edit
242:talk
184:logs
168:talk
164:edit
148:Talk
141:. —
95:talk
35:<
4798:-/-
4730:TKD
4592:TKD
4454:TKD
4377:rex
4307:-/-
3847:one
3648:not
3635:far
3623:lot
3608:or
3596:or
3402:-/-
3162:--
3086:the
3075:all
3054:ANY
2946:or
2769:Rob
2744:use
2472:to
2458:-/-
2428:or
2267:V60
1973:cfc
1953:. —
1886:or
1870:or
1854:or
1802:the
1766:the
1670:the
935:-/-
920:rex
896:...
655:...
220:-/-
143:TKD
137:RfA
88:by
22:Log
4769:|
4765:|
4761:|
4757:|
4753:|
4732:::
4631:|
4627:|
4623:|
4619:|
4615:|
4594:::
4493:|
4489:|
4485:|
4481:|
4477:|
4456:::
4211:|
4207:|
4203:|
4199:|
4195:|
4054:,
3690:.
3639:do
3618:no
3570:JP
3145:.
2890:|
2886:|
2882:|
2878:|
2874:|
2715:--
2694:}}
2688:{{
2597:}}
2591:{{
2559:}}
2553:{{
2523:}}
2517:{{
2513:}}
2507:{{
2503:}}
2497:{{
2480:}}
2474:{{
2436:}}
2430:{{
2426:}}
2420:{{
2416:}}
2410:{{
2398:|
2394:|
2390:|
2386:|
2382:|
2292:)
2288:-
2226:}}
2220:{{
2200:}}
2194:{{
2192:,
2190:}}
2184:{{
2168:|
2164:|
2160:|
2156:|
2152:|
2125:|
2121:|
2117:|
2113:|
2109:|
2082:|
2078:|
2074:|
2070:|
2066:|
1924:)
1920:,
1836:.
1711:,
1631:|
1627:|
1623:|
1619:|
1615:|
1538:|
1516:::
1415:)
1411:,
1392:)
1342:|
1338:|
1334:|
1330:|
1326:|
1245:}}
1239:{{
1235:}}
1229:{{
1225:}}
1219:{{
1215:}}
1209:{{
1189:}}
1183:{{
1171:}}
1165:{{
1161:}}
1155:{{
1126:}}
1120:{{
1116:}}
1110:{{
1097:|
1093:|
1089:|
1085:|
1081:|
1006:)
966:)
962:•
890:}}
884:{{
842:}}
836:{{
814:}}
808:{{
796:|
792:|
788:|
784:|
780:|
708:)
685:)
681:,
649:}}
643:{{
607:}}
601:{{
580:.
574:}}
568:{{
548:|
544:|
540:|
536:|
532:|
462:)
458:,
434:}}
428:{{
424:}}
418:{{
416:—
382:?
380:}}
374:{{
336:|
332:|
328:|
324:|
320:|
248:)
244:,
182:|
178:|
174:|
170:|
166:|
145:::
4773:)
4749:(
4667:c
4663:s
4635:)
4611:(
4529:c
4525:s
4497:)
4473:(
4375:-
4373:T
4292:c
4288:s
4215:)
4191:(
3989:?
3944:,
3572:S
3482:)
3478:(
3316:)
3312:(
2894:)
2870:(
2402:)
2378:(
2284:(
2254:↗
2237:F
2235:M
2232:T
2211:F
2209:M
2206:T
2172:)
2148:(
2129:)
2105:(
2086:)
2062:(
1916:(
1635:)
1611:(
1521:►
1490:t
1488:n
1486:a
1484:i
1482:d
1480:a
1478:R
1407:(
1388:(
1346:)
1322:(
1179:s
1175:s
1101:)
1077:(
1004:c
1002:–
1000:t
998:(
958:(
918:-
916:T
800:)
776:(
706:c
704:–
702:t
700:(
677:(
552:)
528:(
454:(
340:)
316:(
240:(
186:)
162:(
139:)
134:·
128:·
122:·
116:·
110:·
104:·
98:·
93:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.