1661:, and that long-time sports editors are going to have a significant split of opinion on point. The fact that we do not have navboxes for "all-star" selections for Major League Baseball (MLB) or National Basketball Association (NBA) is, I think, the tipping point and the determinative precedent for me. These honors are clearly important and deserve prominent mention in the player articles' infoboxes, but I see navbox-assisted navigation from one all-star player to another as a lower priority among the multiplicity of other professional sports navboxes currently in use for MLB, NBA and NFL players.
1721:
Championship teams have navboxes for their rosters, but it is reasonable to expect that a championship season occupies a large amount of prose in a players bio, and references to his teammates are likely to already exist. A Pro Bowl is but a single exhibition game, and the game is rarely mentioned aside from a selection count in the lead or a brief mention in the body that a player was selected for the exhibition in a given year. Some other navboxes might be worthy of deletion too, but be wary of being
2102:, and nobody would be adding see also's to the other MVPs just because the template did not exist. Guidelines aside, what reliable sources really writes about all Pro Bowl MVPs as a group? Pro Bowl MVP isnt even worthy to mention in the lead of any bio that would be an FA. Other sports All-Star games are at a higher level, witnessed by the fact that the Pro Bowl is on the verge of being cancelled, and is the only sport whose All-Star games get lower ratings than a regular season game.—
1582:- Hold on, are you suggesting that Pro Bowl starter templates are on par with Super Bowl champion team templates like the one linked? Becuase I really don't think the are, either in importance (a championship is typically the most significant achievement in a player's career) or in terms of the connections between the people on the template. Have you ever heard of Pro Bowl teams having reunions 20-30 years after the fact? Because Super Bowl championship teams often do.
1678:. I'm sorry I can't be more original with my argument but I agree with the other deletionists here. These navboxes do nothing more than clutter articles. In college athletics (primarily basketball, football, and baseball), the closest equivalent are All-American navboxes, which have been determined to be notable and valuable. But as far as professional sports are concerned, football is the only sport which utilizes these and I personally think it's
2691:. They are an escalating series, as 65.92.180.137 said this template can't be redundant to the level 2 warning because this template if used primarily when the user in question continues after they have already been warned with the level 2 warning, which is why the bots (and everyone else) will use this template after using the level 2 warning. Feel free to suggest a new wording for all of the NPOV series if you so wish at
2563:(which is more likely to involve an editor deleting text and sources he doesn't agree with and/or adding text that is unreliably sourced, though indeed it may be unsourced as the template suggests). The way that the template is meant to be used, as a sort of pocket summary of NPOV, is more likely to confuse than enlighten the unwary newbie it is likely to target.
1420:, as links in navbox don't reasonably refer to each other, and certainly would not have see also's to the other articles if the navbox didn't exist. The common sense reason is clutter. Most of these players get multiple Pro Bowl invites, and having one for each year makes their pages unwieldy. Has anyone ventured to look at bios like
1298:, for example). unlike other sports where the best players participate in the "all-star game", this does not happen in the NFL, since the players in the Super Bowl are banned from participation. a more meaningful award is say the Pro Football Hall of Fame. we do not need a navbox for more trivial awards.
2810:
per Boing. Wnt, I think you have got the message you were looking for: you do not have any chance of getting consensus to abolish all Level 3 and 4 warnings. One may argue about the exact wordings, but any progressive warning system is going to need, for those who ignore earlier warnings, variants on
2348:
As I stated on some talk page somewhere, I believe that if MLB and NBA All-star game MVPs have templates then so should the NFL. I don't buy this argument about the NFL MVP being less important. Typically on WP we treat like event in a similar manner. E.g., basketball has Player of the Year templates
2161:
Although the Pro Bowl has lost popularity in the last few years, NFL contracts are still written with bonus opportunities based on the game itself. In response to its comparison to MLB and NBA All-Star Games, the Pro Bowl still receives higher TV ratings than both these even though it occurs at the
2769:
I honestly don't think this nomination is going to give you any idea at all of whether warning reform has any chance of success, because people are just going to think that deleting only one message would be stupid - which it would be. (But no, I don't think a mass nomination would be the right way
1518:
No reasonably written bio would refer in prose to the other Pro Bowl members. So why package all those links into a navbox and bomb each bio with needless links to other Pro Bowl players? And one box for every year, nonetheless. Me suspects editors like seeing boxes proliferating on star players'
2716:
to have a set of templates to allow an editor to keep saying the same thing more and more rudely. If the first two levels haven't gotten the point across, the editor should be explaining the exact part of the policy he thinks applies - not posting nastier and nastier wording of vague statements.
1720:
everywhere on WP, but it's not a good reason to expand it. At the very least, an annual award that is prestigious has winners that the article might reference to put the player into historical context. These Pro Bowl navboxes are for single years, so such historical comparisons are unlikely.
1638:
I actually don't think the fact that Super Bowl participants played prior to 2009 matters. I totally agree this is navbox clutter. Just as a point of reference, none of the other "big 4" American sports have navboxes for All-Star starters or participants and I know not long ago at WP:NBA we
1596:
To misread your words for a moment, a navbox can be created if the players on it have a reunion. Do note, though that each member was on the same team and played 17 games together. I understand that the Pro Bowl is not as important as the Super Bowl, but my point for keeping it is to help
1464:
It was already in a navbox full of awards, and now its a single-season Pro Bowl navbox in a general Pro Bowl navbox in an general awards navbox. This is just keeping for the sake of keeping (or winning). Now they need to expand multiple ones to get to these Pro Bowls that are supposedly so
1703:- While you mention WP:CRUFT as a problem, I would like to mention that there are more award NavBoxes than there are Pro Bowl NavBoxes. Are all of those awards important enough to be kept automatically or should they become template for discussion as I can see the reverse being true. --
2315:. We have permitted navbox creators to run wild within WP:NFL's sphere in the past year, and it may be time for a comprehensive review of all navboxes on the WP:NFL talk page, followed by the establishment of some WP:NFL guidelines for the future creation of pro football navboxes.
1656:
per
Rikster's comments immediately above. I had been struggling with how we, as WP:NFL editors, should handle these navboxes. On one hand, selection to the Pro Bowl is clearly a significant and notable honor for NFL players. On the other hand, these navboxes clearly contribute to
1559:, "The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent." Considering it is linking to the articles of players in the Pro Bowl, which should be noted are on different teams and would make it difficult to go from one to another without this navbox, in addition to having
2385:
MLB and NBA hold their game midseason, and is one of the annual highlights for the league. The NFL game is the only major North
American league with their All-Star game at the end of the season, and is considered an afterthought. That probably explains why the MVP only gets
2735:
TfD is not the place to make a point about the warning system. This should either be part of a properly-done mass nomination, or an RfC in a more widely-trafficked community forum. In isolation this TfD is impractical and causes more problems than it would solve.
2645:; it can't be redundant with the level-2 template, since this is a level-3 template. You've been around Knowledge (XXG) for a long time, haven't you ever seen how the vandalism templates are used? Rewriting the template does not involve deletion. --
2577:
are harmful to newbie retention and are a significant cause of the decline of
Knowledge (XXG). This template, the second one I chose at random, may be a trial balloon for the elimination of user warning templates, Twinkle, and Huggle as we know
1286:
1268:
1639:
actually TfD'd navboxes for yearly All-NBA teams with very clear consensus on the matter. Pro Bowls are certainly worth mentioning in the article and maybe including in the achievements section of the infobox, but templates are overboard.
2075:
recently created navbox which is just adding to clutter. unlike other sports where the best players participate in the "all-star game", this does not happen in the NFL, since the players in the Super Bowl are banned from participation.
1597:
navigation from the Pro Bowl articles to the player articles and vice versa. In addition, I feel that the Pro Bowl starter templates are on par with Super Bowl champion team templates in terms of known information being presented. --
2754:
Well, I'm not going to put up 100 TfD templates on 100 pages and nominate 100 authors and so forth without some indication that it has a chance of success, even though I think
Knowledge (XXG) needs the reform.
1823:. There are no similar navboxes for the other sports, and the pages for the individual games list the starters. In addition, the number of Pro Bowls is listed in the infobox for any given player. Being a
1922:
is notable and has an article. It is the navbox that is being considered for deletion. I hope you are not keeping on an alleged technicality of the nomination, and ignoring the arguments others have
2136:
Not really important as an award. Any information could easily be noted in the articles of the people who won it (ie. this play went to x pro bowls and was named the Pro Bowl MVP in x of them).
1657:
bottom-of-the-page cruft that can overwhelm other navboxes that are likely to be more useful to a reader seeking information on other closely-related players. I fully recognize that this is a
1563:
and similar navboxs on the articles for the Super Bowl, which the current article for Super Bowl XLVII has six of them without issue, I believe that this should remain for readers to view. --
42:
37:
1250:
1214:
1178:
1142:
1106:
1070:
1034:
998:
962:
926:
890:
854:
818:
782:
746:
710:
674:
638:
602:
566:
530:
494:
458:
422:
386:
350:
314:
278:
242:
206:
170:
134:
1827:
in the Pro Bowl does not carry notability - any accolades typically list the number of Pro Bowls made, with no reference to how many they started. At this point, it's navbox clutter.
1232:
1196:
1160:
1124:
1088:
1052:
1016:
980:
944:
908:
872:
836:
800:
764:
728:
692:
656:
620:
584:
548:
512:
476:
440:
404:
368:
332:
296:
260:
224:
188:
152:
116:
2329:
I'd imagine those guidelines could eventually be written generic enough to apply to other sports if not all subject areas. It's good to use one project as a starting point though.—
1682:. Good for Peyton Manning for being one of the greatest quarterbacks of all time, but we don't need to banner-hang every Pro Bowl selection with unnecessary navboxes on his page.
2119:
per
Bagumba. The Pro Bowl is not on the same level of the MLB and NBA All-Star Games, for various reasons. I didn't even realize the Pro Bowl had an MVP award until just now. –
1743:
should be removed as well. (Referring to, "an annual award that is prestigious has winners that the article might reference to put the player into historical context.") --
2592:
Formally the reason for this deletion or merge is "2. The template is redundant to a better-designed template". Specifically, its function can be better accomplished by
2793:. If you want to reform the warning system it needs to be done, as Thumperward says, at an RfC or similar - not by nominating one warning template for deletion. --
2067:
2162:
end of the year. Any true NFL fan knows of the Pro Bowl MVP award and the fact it has already informed one person of its existence proves its validity.
2049:
1612:
1262:
2586:
21:
1384:
1849:
1258:
1328:. Being a 'starter' at the Pro Bowl does not mean you started the game, it means you were voted in as a starter. Thus, this template covers those
1450:
and have placed them into their own Pro Bowl Navbox to help with those issues. I believe it is a better idea than deleting them for clutter. --
2615:
I don't understand the nominator, this is the standard level-importance designation type template for vandalism of type "npov" to go along with
2098:
on multiple points. One rarely would want to go from one Pro Bowl MVP to another, there is not even a standalone article for Pro Bowl MVP like
2585:
can escalate automatically, leading to assumption of bad faith made by a machine against what may well be a good user. Additionally the essay
2543:
2525:
2099:
17:
2646:
2359:
1494:
2570:
2192:
2664:
2363:
1959:
I usually don't buy the whole clutter thing, but in this case I agree. Its not necessary to have a template for each Pro Bowl.--
1226:
1190:
1154:
1118:
1082:
1046:
1010:
974:
938:
902:
866:
830:
794:
758:
722:
686:
650:
614:
578:
542:
506:
470:
434:
398:
362:
326:
290:
254:
218:
182:
146:
110:
1428:, whose other more notable awards are buried in a sea of multiple Pro Bowl navboxes? I fail to see how this helps a reader.—
2798:
2775:
2411:
as nomination statement is flawed, the NFL pro-bowl, wether a "real" game or not is still a notable NFL event/statistic -
1906:
as nomination statement is flawed, the NFL pro-bowl, wether a "real" game or not is still a notable NFL event/statistic -
1488:
1222:
1186:
1150:
1114:
1078:
1042:
1006:
970:
934:
898:
862:
826:
790:
754:
718:
682:
646:
610:
574:
538:
502:
466:
430:
394:
358:
322:
286:
250:
214:
178:
142:
106:
1376:
2851:
2687:
No offence intended Wnt, but you seem to have misunderstood how the series warning templates work, I recommend reading
2488:
2458:
2012:
1982:
1717:
78:
2832:
2802:
2779:
2764:
2745:
2726:
2675:
2654:
2605:
2508:
2437:
2415:
2399:
2376:
2338:
2324:
2295:
2281:
2263:
2235:
2208:
2171:
2153:
2128:
2111:
2085:
2032:
1963:
1951:
1932:
1910:
1898:
1875:
1861:
1836:
1832:
1811:
1793:
1766:
1752:
1734:
1712:
1691:
1670:
1648:
1624:
1606:
1591:
1572:
1547:
1528:
1513:
1501:
1474:
1459:
1437:
1408:
1391:
1353:
1307:
99:
1324:
that these templates still cover those players (as well as players that dropped out due to injury) because they were
2695:, deletion should not be used over deletion, plus there is also a series of warnings designed for original research
2043:
2794:
2771:
2251:
1560:
2650:
2145:
2039:
1992:
1894:
1789:
1740:
1364:
1345:
2581:
It is my recollection that bot usage of level 3 and up user warning templates "does not assume good faith"
2519:
2503:
2355:
2218:, especially in light of the fact that no standlone article exists for the award, since it would not meet
2027:
1828:
1748:
1708:
1602:
1568:
1455:
94:
2847:
2741:
2484:
2454:
2320:
2188:
2167:
2008:
1978:
1666:
1404:
74:
2692:
2215:
1316:- Super Bowl players have only been prohibited from playing since 2009, when the Pro Bowl was moved to
2770:
either - it's the warning policy that should be addressed, not the mere presence of the templates) --
1757:
Pro Bowl MVP is not prestigious, if you look at its TfD entry below regarding its lack of notability.—
2387:
2367:
1948:
2559:-oriented policy advice ("adding commentary and your personal analysis") into articles concerning
2424:
above. We are discussing the navbox for the Pro Bowl MVP—which has no standalone article—not the
2308:
2095:
1944:; notability is not an issue, but not everything needs a navbox. Agree with Rikster2's rationale.
1722:
1556:
1417:
2138:
2124:
2081:
1890:
1871:
1785:
1644:
1587:
1338:
1303:
2312:
2269:
2223:
1679:
2477:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
2001:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
67:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
2846:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
2639:
2629:
2619:
2593:
2515:
2500:
2483:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
2468:
2453:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
2433:
2395:
2350:
2334:
2277:
2231:
2204:
2107:
2024:
2007:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
1977:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
1928:
1807:
1762:
1744:
1730:
1704:
1620:
1615:. Cutting them at less significant awards controls clutter. Verifiability is not the issue.—
1598:
1564:
1524:
1470:
1451:
1433:
91:
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
2688:
2560:
2371:
2828:
2737:
2699:
2316:
2291:
2259:
2184:
2163:
1857:
1687:
1662:
1400:
2250:
a corresponding article is created. I would support this navbox's existence if the article
2219:
2196:
1294:
navigational box overkill, which just leads to more clutter (see the number of navboxes in
1543:
2556:
1509:
as nomination statement is flawed, and the links do compliment each other in reference.—
1802:
There are articles already for the games. Why do we need the clutter of a navbox also?.—
1960:
1945:
1447:
1443:
1425:
1421:
2760:
2722:
2671:
2601:
2120:
2077:
1867:
1640:
1583:
1510:
1299:
2429:
2412:
2391:
2330:
2273:
2227:
2200:
2103:
1924:
1907:
1803:
1758:
1726:
1616:
1520:
1466:
1429:
2824:
2287:
2255:
1853:
1683:
2254:
is created, then I'd switch my !vote to keep. As is, however, I !vote delete.
1539:
1295:
2268:
The standalone article doesn't and shouldn't exist because it would not meet
2307:. I agree with Bagumba's analysis above, regarding the application of the
2567:
2756:
2718:
2667:
2597:
2425:
2421:
1919:
1886:
1885:
per
Rikster2's comments. Too much navbox clutter. For example, half of
1399:
as Pro Bowl is still the highest rated "All-Star Game" in sports.
2569:(where also I reference earlier comments I've made) there is now
1784:
Sometimes we need to know who we're the starters in those games.
2840:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2447:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1971:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1845:
2311:
criteria, as well as the group notability of Pro Bowl MVPs per
2349:
for Power conferences, mid-majors and all other conferences.--
1850:
Category:National
Football League Pro Bowl navigational boxes
1848:, the next thing that would have to be done is speedy delete
1259:
Category:National
Football League Pro Bowl navigational boxes
2195:) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
2390:
coverage. These games, and hence awards, are not equal.—
2214:
Your argument of "Any true NFL fan knows ..." reads like
2537:
2531:
2061:
2055:
1280:
1274:
1244:
1238:
1208:
1202:
1172:
1166:
1136:
1130:
1100:
1094:
1064:
1058:
1028:
1022:
992:
986:
956:
950:
920:
914:
884:
878:
848:
842:
812:
806:
776:
770:
740:
734:
704:
698:
668:
662:
632:
626:
596:
590:
560:
554:
524:
518:
488:
482:
452:
446:
416:
410:
380:
374:
344:
338:
308:
302:
272:
266:
236:
230:
200:
194:
164:
158:
128:
122:
2422:#National Football League Pro Bowl navigational boxes
1314:
Keep due to flawed logic on the part of the nominator
2491:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2015:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1336:, so the argument the nominator makes is incorrect.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
60:
National
Football League Pro Bowl navigational boxes
2854:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2551:I am proposing this template for deletion because:
2461:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1985:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1739:Very well, though you are making me question why
2813:If you persist in doing that, you may be blocked
1613:Knowledge (XXG):Not everything needs a navbox
8:
1519:articles as an affirmation of their career.—
2587:Knowledge (XXG):Don't template the regulars
18:Knowledge (XXG):Templates for discussion
1844:- assuming these all go the way of the
2420:You seem to have cut and pasted from
2100:Super Bowl Most Valuable Player Award
7:
2666:- that's why I favor deleting them.
2738:Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward)
1465:important. Yes, this is overkill.—
1363:as nomination statement is flawed.
1223:Template:2013 Pro Bowl NFC starters
1187:Template:2013 Pro Bowl AFC starters
1151:Template:2012 Pro Bowl NFC starters
1115:Template:2012 Pro Bowl AFC starters
1079:Template:2011 Pro Bowl NFC starters
1043:Template:2011 Pro Bowl AFC starters
1007:Template:2010 Pro Bowl NFC starters
971:Template:2010 Pro Bowl AFC starters
935:Template:2009 Pro Bowl NFC starters
899:Template:2009 Pro Bowl AFC starters
863:Template:2008 Pro Bowl NFC starters
827:Template:2008 Pro Bowl AFC starters
791:Template:2007 Pro Bowl NFC starters
755:Template:2007 Pro Bowl AFC starters
719:Template:2006 Pro Bowl NFC starters
683:Template:2006 Pro Bowl AFC starters
647:Template:2006 Pro Bowl NFC starters
611:Template:2006 Pro Bowl AFC starters
575:Template:2005 Pro Bowl NFC starters
539:Template:2005 Pro Bowl AFC starters
503:Template:2004 Pro Bowl NFC starters
467:Template:2004 Pro Bowl AFC starters
431:Template:2003 Pro Bowl NFC starters
395:Template:2003 Pro Bowl AFC starters
359:Template:2002 Pro Bowl NFC starters
323:Template:2002 Pro Bowl AFC starters
287:Template:2001 Pro Bowl NFC starters
251:Template:2001 Pro Bowl AFC starters
215:Template:2000 Pro Bowl NFC starters
179:Template:2000 Pro Bowl AFC starters
143:Template:1999 Pro Bowl NFC starters
107:Template:1999 Pro Bowl AFC starters
90:per Bagumba, Rikster2, and others.
1889:'s navboxes are Pro Bowl related.
28:
2712:I'm suggesting we don't actually
2555:It is poorly thought out, giving
2496:The result of the discussion was
2020:The result of the discussion was
1442:I have looked into the issues at
1330:voted as starters in the Pro Bowl
86:The result of the discussion was
2589:encourages discriminatory usage.
2286:I stand by what I said. Thanks.
1866:see the last entry on the list.
1486:per Bagumba. Navbox overkill. —
1320:the Super Bowl... However, even
1:
30:
2833:12:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
2803:18:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2780:18:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
2765:18:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
2746:11:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2727:04:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2676:04:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2655:03:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
2606:20:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
2509:04:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
2438:17:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
2416:16:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
2400:05:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2377:05:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2339:21:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2325:21:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2296:19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2282:18:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2264:14:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
2236:06:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
2209:06:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
2172:04:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
2154:01:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
2129:22:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
2112:22:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
2086:22:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
2033:03:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
1964:04:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
1952:22:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
1933:17:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
1911:16:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
1899:15:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
1876:19:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1862:18:36, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1852:since it'd be an empty cat.
1837:16:54, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1812:05:41, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1794:05:08, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1767:07:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
1753:01:49, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
1735:18:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1713:17:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1692:14:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1671:13:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1649:13:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1625:18:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1607:17:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1592:13:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1573:07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1548:22:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1529:19:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1514:11:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1502:11:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1475:18:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1460:07:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1438:06:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1409:05:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1392:03:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1354:00:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1308:23:45, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
100:04:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
2871:
2817:If you do that again, you
2663:I saw how they were used
2252:List of NFL Pro Bowl MVPs
1555:- Per the third point on
2843:Please do not modify it.
2480:Please do not modify it.
2450:Please do not modify it.
2004:Please do not modify it.
1974:Please do not modify it.
1561:Template:Super Bowl XLVI
70:Please do not modify it.
2040:Template:Pro Bowl MVPs
1993:Template:Pro Bowl MVPs
1741:Template:Pro Bowl MVPs
1334:played in the Pro Bowl
2573:that these templates
2181:Note to closing admin
1326:voted in as starters
2795:Boing! said Zebedee
2772:Boing! said Zebedee
2571:published argument
1718:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
1538:Navbox overkill -
1332:, not players who
2594:Template:Uw-npov2
2516:Template:Uw-npov3
2469:Template:Uw-npov3
2375:
2211:
1829:Irregulargalaxies
1498:
1390:
51:
50:
2862:
2845:
2704:
2698:
2644:
2638:
2634:
2628:
2624:
2618:
2566:As discussed at
2547:
2482:
2452:
2353:
2178:
2149:
2142:
2071:
2006:
1976:
1500:
1496:
1491:
1387:
1381:
1374:
1372:
1367:
1349:
1342:
1290:
1254:
1218:
1182:
1146:
1110:
1074:
1038:
1002:
966:
930:
894:
858:
822:
786:
750:
714:
678:
642:
606:
570:
534:
498:
462:
426:
390:
354:
318:
282:
246:
210:
174:
138:
72:
47:
36:
31:
2870:
2869:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2861:
2860:
2859:
2858:
2852:deletion review
2841:
2702:
2696:
2642:
2636:
2632:
2626:
2622:
2616:
2514:
2506:
2489:deletion review
2478:
2472:
2465:
2459:deletion review
2448:
2147:
2140:
2038:
2030:
2013:deletion review
2002:
1996:
1989:
1983:deletion review
1972:
1493:
1487:
1385:
1377:
1368:
1365:
1347:
1340:
1257:
1221:
1185:
1149:
1113:
1077:
1041:
1005:
969:
933:
897:
861:
825:
789:
753:
717:
681:
645:
609:
573:
537:
501:
465:
429:
393:
357:
321:
285:
249:
213:
177:
141:
105:
97:
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2868:
2866:
2857:
2856:
2836:
2835:
2805:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2749:
2748:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2707:
2706:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2658:
2657:
2609:
2608:
2590:
2579:
2564:
2549:
2548:
2504:
2494:
2493:
2473:
2471:
2466:
2464:
2463:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2380:
2379:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2175:
2174:
2156:
2131:
2114:
2073:
2072:
2028:
2018:
2017:
1997:
1995:
1990:
1988:
1987:
1967:
1966:
1954:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1914:
1913:
1901:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1839:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1797:
1796:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1695:
1694:
1673:
1651:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1576:
1575:
1550:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1504:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1448:Marshall Faulk
1444:Peyton Manning
1426:Marshall Faulk
1422:Peyton Manning
1411:
1394:
1357:
1356:
1292:
1291:
1255:
1219:
1183:
1147:
1111:
1075:
1039:
1003:
967:
931:
895:
859:
823:
787:
751:
715:
679:
643:
607:
571:
535:
499:
463:
427:
391:
355:
319:
283:
247:
211:
175:
139:
95:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2867:
2855:
2853:
2849:
2844:
2838:
2837:
2834:
2830:
2826:
2822:
2820:
2814:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2789:
2788:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2734:
2733:
2728:
2724:
2720:
2715:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2708:
2701:
2694:
2690:
2686:
2683:
2682:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2665:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2659:
2656:
2652:
2648:
2647:65.92.180.137
2641:
2631:
2621:
2614:
2611:
2610:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2565:
2562:
2558:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2545:
2542:
2539:
2536:
2533:
2532:transclusions
2530:
2527:
2524:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2507:
2502:
2499:
2492:
2490:
2486:
2481:
2475:
2474:
2470:
2467:
2462:
2460:
2456:
2451:
2445:
2444:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2414:
2410:
2407:
2406:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2378:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2303:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2249:
2248:
2243:
2242:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2212:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2177:
2176:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2160:
2157:
2155:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2144:
2143:
2135:
2132:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2069:
2066:
2063:
2060:
2057:
2056:transclusions
2054:
2051:
2048:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2031:
2026:
2023:
2016:
2014:
2010:
2005:
1999:
1998:
1994:
1991:
1986:
1984:
1980:
1975:
1969:
1968:
1965:
1962:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1947:
1943:
1940:
1939:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1921:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1912:
1909:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1891:Thomsonmg2000
1888:
1884:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1840:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1819:
1818:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1786:BattleshipMan
1783:
1780:
1779:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1719:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1659:judgment call
1655:
1652:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1637:
1634:
1633:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1551:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1512:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1499:
1490:
1485:
1482:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1388:
1382:
1380:
1373:
1371:
1362:
1359:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1344:
1343:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1288:
1285:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1275:transclusions
1273:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1243:
1240:
1239:transclusions
1237:
1234:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1203:transclusions
1201:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1167:transclusions
1165:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1131:transclusions
1129:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1095:transclusions
1093:
1090:
1087:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1059:transclusions
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1024:
1023:transclusions
1021:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
997:
994:
991:
988:
987:transclusions
985:
982:
979:
976:
972:
968:
964:
961:
958:
955:
952:
951:transclusions
949:
946:
943:
940:
936:
932:
928:
925:
922:
919:
916:
915:transclusions
913:
910:
907:
904:
900:
896:
892:
889:
886:
883:
880:
879:transclusions
877:
874:
871:
868:
864:
860:
856:
853:
850:
847:
844:
843:transclusions
841:
838:
835:
832:
828:
824:
820:
817:
814:
811:
808:
807:transclusions
805:
802:
799:
796:
792:
788:
784:
781:
778:
775:
772:
771:transclusions
769:
766:
763:
760:
756:
752:
748:
745:
742:
739:
736:
735:transclusions
733:
730:
727:
724:
720:
716:
712:
709:
706:
703:
700:
699:transclusions
697:
694:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:
670:
667:
664:
663:transclusions
661:
658:
655:
652:
648:
644:
640:
637:
634:
631:
628:
627:transclusions
625:
622:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
591:transclusions
589:
586:
583:
580:
576:
572:
568:
565:
562:
559:
556:
555:transclusions
553:
550:
547:
544:
540:
536:
532:
529:
526:
523:
520:
519:transclusions
517:
514:
511:
508:
504:
500:
496:
493:
490:
487:
484:
483:transclusions
481:
478:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
454:
451:
448:
447:transclusions
445:
442:
439:
436:
432:
428:
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
411:transclusions
409:
406:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
375:transclusions
373:
370:
367:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
339:transclusions
337:
334:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
303:transclusions
301:
298:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
267:transclusions
265:
262:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
231:transclusions
229:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
195:transclusions
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
159:transclusions
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
140:
136:
133:
130:
127:
124:
123:transclusions
121:
118:
115:
112:
108:
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
93:
89:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
2842:
2839:
2818:
2816:
2812:
2807:
2790:
2713:
2684:
2612:
2582:
2574:
2550:
2540:
2534:
2528:
2522:
2501:Plastikspork
2497:
2495:
2479:
2476:
2449:
2446:
2408:
2351:TonyTheTiger
2345:
2304:
2246:
2244:
2180:
2158:
2146:
2139:
2137:
2133:
2116:
2091:
2074:
2064:
2058:
2052:
2046:
2025:Plastikspork
2021:
2019:
2003:
2000:
1973:
1970:
1956:
1941:
1903:
1882:
1841:
1824:
1820:
1781:
1745:Super Goku V
1705:Super Goku V
1700:
1675:
1658:
1653:
1635:
1599:Super Goku V
1579:
1565:Super Goku V
1552:
1535:
1506:
1483:
1452:Super Goku V
1413:
1396:
1378:
1369:
1360:
1346:
1339:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1293:
1283:
1277:
1271:
1265:
1247:
1241:
1235:
1229:
1211:
1205:
1199:
1193:
1175:
1169:
1163:
1157:
1139:
1133:
1127:
1121:
1103:
1097:
1091:
1085:
1067:
1061:
1055:
1049:
1031:
1025:
1019:
1013:
995:
989:
983:
977:
959:
953:
947:
941:
923:
917:
911:
905:
887:
881:
875:
869:
851:
845:
839:
833:
815:
809:
803:
797:
779:
773:
767:
761:
743:
737:
731:
725:
707:
701:
695:
689:
671:
665:
659:
653:
635:
629:
623:
617:
599:
593:
587:
581:
563:
557:
551:
545:
527:
521:
515:
509:
491:
485:
479:
473:
455:
449:
443:
437:
419:
413:
407:
401:
383:
377:
371:
365:
347:
341:
335:
329:
311:
305:
299:
293:
275:
269:
263:
257:
239:
233:
227:
221:
203:
197:
191:
185:
167:
161:
155:
149:
131:
125:
119:
113:
92:Plastikspork
87:
85:
69:
66:
2821:be blocked!
2317:Dirtlawyer1
2216:WP:FANCRUFT
2185:Dabullzrule
2164:Dabullzrule
2094:This fails
1663:Dirtlawyer1
1401:Dabullzrule
2575:in general
2388:WP:ROUTINE
2368:WP:CHICAGO
1489:This, that
1296:John Elway
55:January 30
43:January 31
38:January 29
2848:talk page
2485:talk page
2455:talk page
2309:WP:NAVBOX
2148:Nidhiki05
2096:WP:NAVBOX
2009:talk page
1979:talk page
1961:Yankees10
1946:Mackensen
1723:WP:POINTy
1557:WP:NAVBOX
1495:the other
1418:WP:NAVBOX
1370:Strikeout
1366:Automatic
1348:Nidhiki05
75:talk page
2850:or in a
2640:uw-npov4
2630:uw-npov2
2620:uw-npov1
2544:subpages
2487:or in a
2457:or in a
2428:itself.—
2426:Pro Bowl
2313:WP:NLIST
2270:WP:LISTN
2224:WP:LISTN
2193:contribs
2121:Muboshgu
2078:Frietjes
2068:subpages
2011:or in a
1981:or in a
1920:Pro Bowl
1868:Frietjes
1680:WP:CRUFT
1641:Rikster2
1584:Rikster2
1511:kookface
1300:Frietjes
1287:subpages
1251:subpages
1215:subpages
1179:subpages
1143:subpages
1107:subpages
1071:subpages
1035:subpages
999:subpages
963:subpages
927:subpages
891:subpages
855:subpages
819:subpages
783:subpages
747:subpages
711:subpages
675:subpages
639:subpages
603:subpages
567:subpages
531:subpages
495:subpages
459:subpages
423:subpages
387:subpages
351:subpages
315:subpages
279:subpages
243:subpages
207:subpages
171:subpages
135:subpages
77:or in a
20: |
2815:" and "
2700:uw-nor1
2689:WP:UWUL
2561:WP:NPOV
2526:history
2430:Bagumba
2413:Rehnn83
2392:Bagumba
2372:WP:FOUR
2331:Bagumba
2274:Bagumba
2245:Delete
2228:Bagumba
2201:Bagumba
2104:Bagumba
2050:history
1925:Bagumba
1923:given.—
1908:Rehnn83
1887:Ed Reed
1883:Delete,
1842:Comment
1825:starter
1804:Bagumba
1759:Bagumba
1727:Bagumba
1701:Comment
1617:Bagumba
1580:Comment
1521:Bagumba
1467:Bagumba
1430:Bagumba
1269:history
1233:history
1197:history
1161:history
1125:history
1089:history
1053:history
1017:history
981:history
945:history
909:history
873:history
837:history
801:history
765:history
729:history
693:history
657:history
621:history
585:history
549:history
513:history
477:history
441:history
405:history
369:history
333:history
297:history
261:history
225:history
189:history
153:history
117:history
2825:JohnCD
2693:WT:UTM
2305:Delete
2288:Jrcla2
2256:Jrcla2
2247:unless
2220:WP:GNG
2134:Delete
2117:Delete
2092:Delete
2022:Delete
1957:Delete
1949:(talk)
1942:Delete
1854:Jrcla2
1821:Delete
1684:Jrcla2
1676:Delete
1654:Delete
1636:Delete
1536:Delete
1497:(talk)
1492:, and
1484:Delete
1416:Fails
1414:Delete
1318:before
88:Delete
2578:them.
2557:WP:OR
1540:Nabla
46:: -->
16:<
2829:talk
2819:will
2808:Keep
2799:talk
2791:Keep
2776:talk
2761:talk
2742:talk
2723:talk
2714:need
2685:Keep
2672:talk
2651:talk
2613:Keep
2602:talk
2538:logs
2520:talk
2498:keep
2434:talk
2409:Keep
2396:talk
2346:Keep
2335:talk
2321:talk
2292:talk
2278:talk
2260:talk
2232:talk
2205:talk
2189:talk
2168:talk
2159:Keep
2125:talk
2108:talk
2082:talk
2062:logs
2044:talk
1929:talk
1904:Keep
1895:talk
1872:talk
1858:talk
1846:dodo
1833:talk
1808:talk
1790:talk
1782:Keep
1763:talk
1749:talk
1731:talk
1709:talk
1688:talk
1667:talk
1645:talk
1621:talk
1611:See
1603:talk
1588:talk
1569:talk
1553:Keep
1544:talk
1525:talk
1507:Keep
1471:talk
1456:talk
1446:and
1434:talk
1405:talk
1397:Keep
1361:Keep
1322:with
1304:talk
1281:logs
1263:talk
1245:logs
1227:talk
1209:logs
1191:talk
1173:logs
1155:talk
1137:logs
1119:talk
1101:logs
1083:talk
1065:logs
1047:talk
1029:logs
1011:talk
993:logs
975:talk
957:logs
939:talk
921:logs
903:talk
885:logs
867:talk
849:logs
831:talk
813:logs
795:talk
777:logs
759:talk
741:logs
723:talk
705:logs
687:talk
669:logs
651:talk
633:logs
615:talk
597:logs
579:talk
561:logs
543:talk
525:logs
507:talk
489:logs
471:talk
453:logs
435:talk
417:logs
399:talk
381:logs
363:talk
345:logs
327:talk
309:logs
291:talk
273:logs
255:talk
237:logs
219:talk
201:logs
183:talk
165:logs
147:talk
129:logs
111:talk
35:<
2823:".
2757:Wnt
2719:Wnt
2668:Wnt
2598:Wnt
2583:and
2364:BIO
2222:or
2199:. —
2197:XfD
2141:Toa
1424:or
1341:Toa
22:Log
2831:)
2801:)
2778:)
2763:)
2744:)
2725:)
2703:}}
2697:{{
2674:)
2653:)
2643:}}
2637:{{
2635:,
2633:}}
2627:{{
2625:,
2623:}}
2617:{{
2604:)
2596:.
2505:―Œ
2436:)
2398:)
2374:)
2337:)
2323:)
2294:)
2280:)
2272:.—
2262:)
2234:)
2226:.—
2207:)
2191:•
2183::
2179:—
2170:)
2127:)
2110:)
2084:)
2029:―Œ
1931:)
1897:)
1874:)
1860:)
1835:)
1810:)
1792:)
1765:)
1751:)
1733:)
1725:.—
1711:)
1690:)
1669:)
1647:)
1623:)
1605:)
1590:)
1571:)
1546:)
1527:)
1473:)
1458:)
1436:)
1407:)
1383:•
1306:)
96:―Œ
2827:(
2811:"
2797:(
2774:(
2759:(
2740:(
2721:(
2705:.
2670:(
2649:(
2600:(
2546:)
2541:·
2535:·
2529:·
2523:·
2518:(
2432:(
2394:(
2370:/
2366:/
2362:/
2360:C
2358:/
2356:T
2354:(
2333:(
2319:(
2290:(
2276:(
2258:(
2230:(
2203:(
2187:(
2166:(
2123:(
2106:(
2080:(
2070:)
2065:·
2059:·
2053:·
2047:·
2042:(
1927:(
1893:(
1870:(
1856:(
1831:(
1806:(
1788:(
1761:(
1747:(
1729:(
1707:(
1686:(
1665:(
1643:(
1619:(
1601:(
1586:(
1567:(
1542:(
1523:(
1469:(
1454:(
1432:(
1403:(
1389:)
1386:C
1379:T
1375:(
1302:(
1289:)
1284:·
1278:·
1272:·
1266:·
1261:(
1253:)
1248:·
1242:·
1236:·
1230:·
1225:(
1217:)
1212:·
1206:·
1200:·
1194:·
1189:(
1181:)
1176:·
1170:·
1164:·
1158:·
1153:(
1145:)
1140:·
1134:·
1128:·
1122:·
1117:(
1109:)
1104:·
1098:·
1092:·
1086:·
1081:(
1073:)
1068:·
1062:·
1056:·
1050:·
1045:(
1037:)
1032:·
1026:·
1020:·
1014:·
1009:(
1001:)
996:·
990:·
984:·
978:·
973:(
965:)
960:·
954:·
948:·
942:·
937:(
929:)
924:·
918:·
912:·
906:·
901:(
893:)
888:·
882:·
876:·
870:·
865:(
857:)
852:·
846:·
840:·
834:·
829:(
821:)
816:·
810:·
804:·
798:·
793:(
785:)
780:·
774:·
768:·
762:·
757:(
749:)
744:·
738:·
732:·
726:·
721:(
713:)
708:·
702:·
696:·
690:·
685:(
677:)
672:·
666:·
660:·
654:·
649:(
641:)
636:·
630:·
624:·
618:·
613:(
605:)
600:·
594:·
588:·
582:·
577:(
569:)
564:·
558:·
552:·
546:·
541:(
533:)
528:·
522:·
516:·
510:·
505:(
497:)
492:·
486:·
480:·
474:·
469:(
461:)
456:·
450:·
444:·
438:·
433:(
425:)
420:·
414:·
408:·
402:·
397:(
389:)
384:·
378:·
372:·
366:·
361:(
353:)
348:·
342:·
336:·
330:·
325:(
317:)
312:·
306:·
300:·
294:·
289:(
281:)
276:·
270:·
264:·
258:·
253:(
245:)
240:·
234:·
228:·
222:·
217:(
209:)
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:)
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:)
132:·
126:·
120:·
114:·
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.