977:
unfamiliar with
Wikiprojects and how Knowledge (XXG) works). I am interested in helping reenergize a project that has been somewhat dormant (I know, I know, you think I am tilting at windmills). I think the banner is part of the solution, and something that should be addressed at the beginning to help get the Wikiproject more active (crazy!!). For those reasons, I believe this nomination is premature, and these discussions are best had at the Wikiproject itself. Given how inexperienced I am compared to you, I am not sure why you insist on looking at this thru a chicken and egg lens, where one step must absolutely occur before anyone even thinks about the other one (also not sure why you seem so keen about Wikiproject Toronto never becoming active again), but I assume it is due to your superior judgment and knowledge. I wouldn't have thought there was a rush to deal with this, but apparently there is. Who knew! Honestly I don't care, since if it is deleted or redirected, I will just end up recreating a banner in the next few weeks as a proposal to assist with the discussions over at WPTORONTO. If you are really insistent that we must deal with this now, do what you want. At the end of the day, I'm simply becoming discouraged about doing anything.
879:. So far as I can tell, from what the gnome says, it isn't in use on article talk pages at all. There tends to be a fairly standard history to most WikiProjects, in that, over time, particularly after what the early editors involved with the project finish what they consider to be the most important content relative to the topic, the projects become less active or inactive, and the best way to ensure that there is any degree of attention in some organized fashion is to basically absorb it into the logical parent project. So far as I can tell, this has, more or less, been done already regarding the use of this banner, and the Toronto project's incorporation into the Canada project. I honestly cannot see any good reason to necessarily keep this banner, and not turn it into a redirect to the Canada banner, but under the circumstances if such is desired maybe tagging it as "historical" might work. But if the Toronto project is itself, apparently, moribund, and given that this particular banner has no particular individual characteristics, I really don't even see any particular need for that. It would make much more sense to try to turn the project into an active concern than it would to worry about keeping a banner which isn't apparently in use anyway.
962:
who have been involved in dealing with dormant projects. In fact, I think the WikiProject
Council in general more or less agrees with my "personal opinions" above. And, as someone who has recently proposed the merging of the Occult and Parapsychology projects, and have proposed and initiated several others earlier, if there is no activity on a page, and if the project is basically moribund, with little if any attention, then the one or two individuals who oppose it might be the only respondants. Under the circumstances, I think turning the existing page to a redirect to the Canada banner, with the possibility of restoring it as a separate banner if and when there actually is sufficient activity in the project itself, is probably the best way to go.
1044:
Please realize the XfD's are intended as places to discuss the possible debate, and not places to engage in completely unrelated, irrational, and irrelevant impugnings of others. Frankly, based on the behavior of one editor involved here, I would have very serious questions whether that individual would be able to revive any sort of collaborative effort, because, honestly, I have difficulty seeing why anyone would want to have any more contact with him than circumstances absolutely require, and, to forego the probable knee-jerk offtopic response, no, I am not talking about myself here.
764:
but you never responded and then quietly nominated this for deletion three months later. And your comment here suggests that you misunderstood the point I was making at the WP:OKANAGAN discussion (I specifically referred to the fact that some of the
Okanagan articles are not exclusive to WP:CANADA). All this just reinforces the impression that this nomination is premature. I'm not trying to be difficult, but the WP:TORONTO project is all but dead, and if we have more flexibility than I initially would have thought, then it should be part of a larger discussion. --
855:
range of options, including maintaining a separate banner with or without additional features (without needing to worry about how any such features could impact and/or be translated for
Wikiproject Nova Scotia or Wikiproject Canadian Law). Maybe we'd never go this route, in which case nothing lost nothing gained, but that's I was suggesting this was premature. It's partially my own fault because I didn't follow up on this issue when I first raised it in December.
1013:, you would notice that I was the one who created the banner in the first place, as I did for many of the WikiProjects I helped get off the ground when they were proposed for creation. And, of course, at no point did I make anything which would remotely rationally draw the conclusions you leapt to. Honestly, if you can't provide reasonable responses, it probably is better to just be quiet and not engage in the over-the-top hysterics I see above.
947:
its banner into the WPCANADA banner - a global decision was made with no consideration of what we might want to be doing at WPTORONTO on a go-forward basis. The future of this banner and the project is a discussion we should be trying to have at the
Wikiproject, not here, which is why I raised it over there three months ago and why this nomination is premature (and surprising since no one questioned my thoughts when I raised them over there).
1092:
at, like WP:CANELEC and WP:PPAP, don't have separate banners, and don't have constant discussion on their talk pages, but they still have useful policy pages and ongoing tasks, and they generally respond to questions quickly, so I'm having a hard time appreciating what you hope the WP:TORONTO project would gain by adding an extra banner to the talk pages of its articles. —
720:- There is no consensus to delete this template on the Wikiproject talk page. We should be stepping back, assessing how the use of the WikiProject Canada banner has worked for WikiProject Toronto. Sadly, WikiProject Toronto is relatively inactive, and one way we might re-energize the project is to increase our visibility. At a minimum, this deletion is premature. --
787:, but there is currently no discussion about doing so, and I imagine that such a feature could be added to the Canada template fairly easily. I don't see what is gained from separate templates, but I do see what's lost: projects get tagged in only one Canada project when they should be in two or more of them. —
778:
What flexibility are you looking for? The Canada template has all the features of this one. The only flexibility that we would be losing is the ability to tag something as part of WP:Toronto but not WP:Canada. That's a useful feature for the
Okanagan banner, but when would this banner ever need it? I
1058:
I wasn't criticizing you for anything of the sort. I was pointing out how arrogant and insulting your comments here and on my talk page have been. You apparently feel free to apply all manner of adjectives to my behaviour, and then scold me when I take issue with your approach. I'm sorry you have
946:
And I believe the exact opposite, for a whole range of reasons. We can use it to identify priority projects, organized collaborations, task forces, etc., all flexibility and visibility we do not have as part of WP:CANADA. The fact is there was never consensus at WPTORONTO for the incorporation of
1091:
I think it's possible to identify priority project and coordinate efforts using a merged banner (especially since the project has its own importance ranking). So I guess I just give less credit to how much work a separate banner does for advertising a project. The wikiprojects that I usually work
961:
If a project is basically inactive, then, as someone who has dealt with several merger proposals over time, one might think that the first priority would be to reactivate it, rather than seek to use its banner. And what someone above calls my "personal opinions" are in fact shared by other editors
854:
A separate banner is evidently more visible than one incorprated as a line of text in the WP:CANADA banner. For a project that is so strangely inactive (so much so that it was proposed a few months back we simply redirect the talk page to WP:CANTALK), it seems to me that we should be discussing a
763:
That's not true at all. The only relevance of the WP:OKANAGAN discussion was that it was made clear that each
Wikiproject itself can decide itself whether it wants to use the WPCANADA banner or not. Not only did I speak to the issue at WP:TORONTO of raising the visibility of the Toronto project,
1043:
I am sorry that you seem to now be criticizing me for showing I was legitimately notified of this discussion, as the creator of the template in question, after you had previously challenged my input above. Honestly, you seem to show little if any capacity for directly addressing the topic at all.
991:
I also see you've been canvassing over at the
Wikiproject Council to get input from "some editors experienced in the life cycle of WikiProjects", just to help make sure I know how silly I am being by thinking that WPTORONTO might be worth trying to envigorate. Well done! You really succeeded in
921:
still had more). I do like having independent wikiprojects for Canada topics; they give topics their own 1.0 tables and they give a page to list style and policy for that topic. While it would be nice if some users were actively working on the wikiproject page to improve
Toronto articles, I don't
897:
I think you completely miss the point. The fact that it's not in use today (as it was at one point) is the problem I am trying to remedy. And, in any event, your personal views on moribund
Wikiprojects notwithstanding, there is nothing requiring us to delete tools that a Wikiproject may want to
976:
Putting aside for a moment the tremendously high esteem that the Wikiproject Council holds you in, and your vast experience with unrelated Wikiprojects, I will take your patronizing comments to heart and try to explain myself again because I must not be expressing myself very well (being so
1171:
If you can show me the details, I would be willing to try to implement the proposals for the US project on the Canada banner, if they're workable. I regret to say that even though I'm not that good of a code monkey, the primary reason I sought adminship was to be able to work on banners.
1008:
While noting your own instant reversion to sarcasm in the comments above, it should be noted that I came to this discussion by a notice on my talk page about this discussion. You see, if you bothered to look through the template's history
807:
Discussing the takeover of WPVANCOUVER in a WPTORONTO discussion is wrong. There's been no notice to WPVANCOUVER of anything to this effect. Removal of WPVANCOUVER's banner without even discussing it with WPVANCOUVER is imperialistic. --
734:
The only objections on the project page were based on the precedent of WP:OKANAGAN, but that's not really a useful comparison because some of the Okanagan articles are not exclusive to WP:CANADA, so the templates cannot be merged.
1251:
to "yes". Although people often get attached to "their" banners, you get the same practical results (e.g., bot work and priority categories) from a properly implemented task force system. The only reason why we would really
1243:, which is the usual central place to announce XFDs involving WikiProject infrastructure, especially smaller groups. Although I'm willing to defer to any WikiProject's personal preference, I think that the best choice is to
1204:
I'm not sure if the more appropriate response is mute awe at the work of whoever put that thing together, or cringing terror at the prospect of trying to do anything similar myself. But I have to admit, it looks very good.
916:
I agree with John Carter, although to be fair to Skeezix, this did have some transclusions before I replaced them with the Canada banner, and I could undo those edits if need be (although the Canada banner with
510:
492:
205:
277:
187:
1116:
Fair enough. Just delete it. I withdraw my objection. I'm clearly trying to push a boulder up a hill here. Arctic, you've been very reasonable and measured in your responses, and I appreciate that.
259:
313:
295:
696:
This template is only used on project pages explaining how to use it. On all article talk pages, the WikiProject Canada banner is used with the toronto=yes and toronto-importance= parameters. —
169:
518:
No navigational functionality. Used in only one article (the one song from the album that has an article) and the full track listing is only a click away by going to the album page.
42:
37:
241:
151:
133:
1131:
I try to me measured. Debates on this site can get ugly when we aren't careful with our language; it's important to remember that we're all working for the good of the project. —
223:
115:
688:
670:
898:
use. If this gets deleted, I am simply going to propose recreating it in some form as part of the effort to get the project going, so deleting it now is premature.
1187:
822:
You've misunderstood my argument, sorry for not being clear. I wasn't proposing to do anything to the Vancouver banner, I was just using that banner's
21:
1256:
to keep a separate banner is if WikiProject Toronto wants to support an article that WikiProject Canada has rejected as being out of scope.
17:
486:
1191:
1158:
809:
181:
1141:
1102:
932:
836:
797:
745:
706:
321:
Minimal navigational function since most of the songs don't have their own articles and the ones that do are already better served by
253:
664:
482:
435:
289:
177:
1157:
had a plan to do that before. It would give prominence to those items where WPTORONTO's importance is higher than WPCANADA's. --
249:
285:
784:
145:
631:
217:
109:
660:
596:
141:
1284:
616:
586:
455:
425:
213:
105:
78:
1265:
1214:
1199:
1181:
1166:
1146:
1126:
1107:
1068:
1053:
1038:
1022:
1001:
986:
971:
956:
937:
907:
888:
864:
841:
817:
802:
773:
750:
729:
711:
653:
567:
537:
475:
406:
367:
350:
98:
1240:
1153:
The plan to implement coloured importances for the subprojects that support importances should be implemented.
1195:
1162:
813:
1261:
1137:
1098:
928:
832:
793:
741:
702:
649:
470:
379:
325:
93:
1280:
1210:
1177:
1122:
1064:
1049:
1034:
1018:
997:
982:
967:
952:
903:
884:
860:
769:
725:
612:
582:
451:
421:
74:
1029:
I didn't think you could get more condescending and negative than you were earlier, but I was wrong.--
1247:
this name into the bigger group's. Ideally, if you use the redirect, it would automagically set the
826:
parameter as an example of a feature that the WPTORONTO banner might hypothetically want to add. —
642:
558:
397:
363:
1059:
chosen to make this discussion so difficult and have approached the whole issue so negatively.
605:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
444:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
67:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.
1279:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
1257:
1132:
1093:
923:
827:
788:
736:
697:
611:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
581:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
467:
450:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
90:
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
1206:
1173:
1118:
1060:
1045:
1030:
1014:
993:
992:
putting me in my place. Good thing, because I naively might have put effort into WPTORONTO.
978:
963:
948:
899:
880:
856:
765:
721:
1154:
1190:
all workgroups have colourized importances, the same as the main importance parameter. --
637:
549:
388:
359:
922:
think that a banner on the talk page is going to serve much advertizing purpose. —
779:
guess a separate banner would allow the option to add new parameters, like
1273:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
575:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
414:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1010:
682:
676:
504:
498:
307:
301:
271:
265:
235:
229:
199:
193:
163:
157:
127:
121:
619:). No further edits should be made to this section.
458:). No further edits should be made to this section.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1287:). No further edits should be made to this section.
589:). No further edits should be made to this section.
428:). No further edits should be made to this section.
483:Template:Havoc and Bright Lights track listing
436:Template:Havoc and Bright Lights track listing
8:
178:Template:John Travolta Wannabe track listing
1188:template:WikiProject United States/sandbox2
250:Template:Absolute First Album track listing
286:Category:T-ara album track list templates
18:Knowledge (XXG):Templates for discussion
1248:
918:
823:
780:
7:
142:Template:Jewelry Box track listing
28:
624:The result of the discussion was
463:The result of the discussion was
214:Template:Day by Day track listing
106:Template:Temptastic track listing
86:The result of the discussion was
375:- unnecessary, especially since
785:Template:WikiProject Vancouver
546:per nom; template not useful.
1:
30:
661:Template:WikiProject Toronto
597:Template:WikiProject Toronto
1304:
1266:00:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
1215:19:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
1200:06:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
1182:00:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
1167:00:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
1147:23:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
1127:16:18, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
1108:14:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
1069:19:11, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
1054:17:38, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
1039:17:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
1023:16:36, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
1002:22:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
987:22:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
972:20:07, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
957:19:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
938:17:13, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
908:19:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
889:15:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
865:15:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
842:05:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
818:04:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
803:23:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
774:19:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
751:18:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
730:13:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
712:02:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
568:22:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
538:03:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
407:22:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
368:14:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
351:04:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
60:T-ara track list templates
654:19:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
476:00:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
99:00:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
1276:Please do not modify it.
628:to improve the project.
608:Please do not modify it.
578:Please do not modify it.
447:Please do not modify it.
417:Please do not modify it.
70:Please do not modify it.
877:if it were ever in use
1239:I saw the note at
871:A separate banner
1145:
1106:
936:
840:
801:
749:
710:
635:
632:non-admin closure
566:
405:
51:
50:
1295:
1278:
1250:
1135:
1096:
926:
920:
875:be more visible
830:
825:
791:
782:
739:
700:
692:
645:
640:
629:
610:
580:
565:
562:
556:
553:
547:
536:
533:
530:
527:
524:
521:
514:
449:
419:
404:
401:
395:
392:
386:
384:
378:
349:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
330:
324:
317:
281:
245:
209:
173:
137:
72:
47:
36:
31:
1303:
1302:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1285:deletion review
1274:
659:
643:
638:
617:deletion review
606:
600:
593:
587:deletion review
576:
560:
557:
551:
548:
534:
531:
528:
525:
522:
519:
481:
473:
456:deletion review
445:
439:
432:
426:deletion review
415:
399:
396:
390:
387:
382:
376:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
328:
322:
284:
248:
212:
176:
140:
104:
96:
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1301:
1299:
1290:
1289:
1269:
1268:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1111:
1110:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
941:
940:
913:
912:
911:
910:
892:
891:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
756:
755:
754:
753:
694:
693:
622:
621:
601:
599:
594:
592:
591:
571:
570:
516:
515:
471:
461:
460:
440:
438:
433:
431:
430:
410:
409:
370:
319:
318:
282:
246:
210:
174:
138:
94:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1300:
1288:
1286:
1282:
1277:
1271:
1270:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1237:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:65.92.180.137
1189:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:65.92.180.137
1156:
1152:
1148:
1143:
1139:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1109:
1104:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1089:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
975:
974:
973:
969:
965:
960:
959:
958:
954:
950:
945:
944:
943:
942:
939:
934:
930:
925:
915:
914:
909:
905:
901:
896:
895:
894:
893:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
862:
858:
853:
843:
838:
834:
829:
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
810:65.92.180.137
806:
805:
804:
799:
795:
790:
786:
777:
776:
775:
771:
767:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
752:
747:
743:
738:
733:
732:
731:
727:
723:
719:
716:
715:
714:
713:
708:
704:
699:
690:
687:
684:
681:
678:
677:transclusions
675:
672:
669:
666:
662:
658:
657:
656:
655:
651:
647:
646:
641:
633:
627:
620:
618:
614:
609:
603:
602:
598:
595:
590:
588:
584:
579:
573:
572:
569:
564:
563:
555:
554:
545:
542:
541:
540:
539:
512:
509:
506:
503:
500:
499:transclusions
497:
494:
491:
488:
484:
480:
479:
478:
477:
474:
469:
466:
459:
457:
453:
448:
442:
441:
437:
434:
429:
427:
423:
418:
412:
411:
408:
403:
402:
394:
393:
381:
380:T-ara singles
374:
371:
369:
365:
361:
358:
355:
354:
353:
352:
327:
326:T-ara singles
315:
312:
309:
306:
303:
302:transclusions
300:
297:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
266:transclusions
264:
261:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
237:
234:
231:
230:transclusions
228:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
194:transclusions
192:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
158:transclusions
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
139:
135:
132:
129:
126:
123:
122:transclusions
120:
117:
114:
111:
107:
103:
102:
101:
100:
97:
92:
89:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
1275:
1272:
1258:WhatamIdoing
1253:
1244:
1133:Arctic Gnome
1094:Arctic Gnome
924:Arctic Gnome
919:|toronto=yes
876:
872:
828:Arctic Gnome
789:Arctic Gnome
737:Arctic Gnome
717:
698:Arctic Gnome
695:
685:
679:
673:
667:
636:
625:
623:
607:
604:
577:
574:
559:
550:
543:
517:
507:
501:
495:
489:
468:Plastikspork
464:
462:
446:
443:
416:
413:
398:
389:
372:
356:
320:
310:
304:
298:
292:
274:
268:
262:
256:
238:
232:
226:
220:
202:
196:
190:
184:
166:
160:
154:
148:
130:
124:
118:
112:
91:Plastikspork
87:
85:
69:
66:
1207:John Carter
1174:John Carter
1119:Skeezix1000
1061:Skeezix1000
1046:John Carter
1031:Skeezix1000
1015:John Carter
994:Skeezix1000
979:Skeezix1000
964:John Carter
949:Skeezix1000
900:Skeezix1000
881:John Carter
857:Skeezix1000
766:Skeezix1000
722:Skeezix1000
1241:WT:COUNCIL
1186:It's here
1281:talk page
1249:|toronto=
613:talk page
583:talk page
452:talk page
422:talk page
75:talk page
1283:or in a
1245:redirect
1142:contribs
1103:contribs
933:contribs
837:contribs
798:contribs
746:contribs
707:contribs
689:subpages
615:or in a
585:or in a
511:subpages
454:or in a
424:or in a
385:exists.
360:Frietjes
314:subpages
278:subpages
242:subpages
206:subpages
170:subpages
134:subpages
77:or in a
55:March 21
43:March 22
38:March 20
20: |
671:history
493:history
296:history
260:history
224:history
188:history
152:history
116:history
1155:WP:USA
824:|city=
781:|city=
544:Delete
523:cheers
465:delete
373:Delete
357:delete
336:cheers
88:delete
873:would
644:snore
552:Gong
526:peaks
391:Gong
339:peaks
46:: -->
16:<
1262:talk
1254:need
1211:talk
1196:talk
1178:talk
1163:talk
1138:talk
1123:talk
1099:talk
1065:talk
1050:talk
1035:talk
1019:talk
1011:here
998:talk
983:talk
968:talk
953:talk
929:talk
904:talk
885:talk
861:talk
833:talk
814:talk
794:talk
770:talk
742:talk
726:talk
718:Keep
703:talk
683:logs
665:talk
626:keep
561:show
535:wars
532:lost
529:news
520:Star
505:logs
487:talk
400:show
364:talk
348:wars
345:lost
342:news
333:Star
308:logs
290:talk
272:logs
254:talk
236:logs
218:talk
200:logs
182:talk
164:logs
146:talk
128:logs
110:talk
35:<
783:in
639:Eye
22:Log
1264:)
1213:)
1198:)
1180:)
1165:)
1140:•
1125:)
1117:--
1101:•
1067:)
1052:)
1037:)
1021:)
1000:)
985:)
970:)
955:)
931:•
906:)
887:)
863:)
835:•
816:)
796:•
772:)
744:•
728:)
705:•
652:)
650:PC
472:―Œ
383:}}
377:{{
366:)
331:.
329:}}
323:{{
95:―Œ
1260:(
1209:(
1194:(
1176:(
1161:(
1144:)
1136:(
1121:(
1105:)
1097:(
1063:(
1048:(
1033:(
1017:(
996:(
981:(
966:(
951:(
935:)
927:(
902:(
883:(
859:(
839:)
831:(
812:(
800:)
792:(
768:(
748:)
740:(
735:—
724:(
709:)
701:(
691:)
686:·
680:·
674:·
668:·
663:(
648:(
634:)
630:(
513:)
508:·
502:·
496:·
490:·
485:(
362:(
316:)
311:·
305:·
299:·
293:·
288:(
280:)
275:·
269:·
263:·
257:·
252:(
244:)
239:·
233:·
227:·
221:·
216:(
208:)
203:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
180:(
172:)
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:)
131:·
125:·
119:·
113:·
108:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.