Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse/Questions/Archive 690

2223:. I may be wrong, but I suspect that your question means that you think that Knowledge (XXG) is like a directory, and you can just get something (a blog, or a website) listed. It isn't. We aren't a directory, and we don't have listings. What we have is articles, which are neutrally written and based on independent, reliably published material about the subject. If there are several places where people who have no connection with the blog or website have chosen to published in-depth material about it, then we can have an article on it, based on those independent sources (the content of the blog, and anything that people say about it who are connected with it, are of very little interest to Knowledge (XXG)). If not, then I'm afraid that it is not possible to write an accaptable article about it. Please read the essays 2305:, seems to be a high quality, reliable source. Your second source is to MachHow2, which looks like a blog of some sort to me. None of the posts are signed by actual human beings and I see no evidence of professional editorial control. The third reference also appears to be a blog post written by someone called Chris Hauk, self described as a "magnificent bastard". That is not evidence that he or his blog is a reliable source. The fourth source is published by the company that produced this software. Since it is not an independent source, it is of no value in establishing notabilty. You need much better sources for a freestanding article about this software. 807:

subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Knowledge (XXG):Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge (XXG) at this time.

1623:

words (rather than cut/pasting it as quote.) (So, how about: TV Guide Magazine reported that the October 9th episode had been the most viewed primetime show that week, attracting 18.2 million viewers, and beating NCIS and the Big Bang Theory - plus citation). Had it been Mr Smith, the head of TV Magazine was stated as saying "And the October 9th episode...etc.", that might have been different, and would have deserved a full quote. There's more on quotations and formatting at

1134:

what's the best action here for the page? Delete it and start again? I also was wrongly identified as being a "sock puppet" on the WP:Articles for deletion/The Homes of Football. I am a photography student. I would like to create some articles on my favourite female photographers - another project I am working on now - and thought a good place to start would be editing a pre-existing article with readily identifiable flaws before I create wholly new content.

1940:. Several of your references are to other Knowledge (XXG) articles. Those references should be removed immediately, because one Knowledge (XXG) article can never be a reference for another Knowledge (XXG) article. Even more important is that none of your references are to reliable, independent sources that devote significant coverage to the topic of the Zumbyes. University affiliated sources are not truly independent and do not establish notabilty. 35: 295:

Knowledge (XXG) is about. If all you wish to do is tell the world about this singer, you should confine your efforts to actual social media or their official site. If you are interested in being a Knowledge (XXG) contributor in general and not just specifically for this person, you need to comply with the policies mentioned here, especially regarding your username which you should request be changed as soon as possible.

1148:

chose this subject as I'm a student of photography and had been doing a project on photography and football, where Clarke's work featured quite heavily. So, I felt that he was a good subject for my first edit as I felt I knew quite a lot about hm and his work. This was discussed with @David notMD and I hoped I clarified that I do not have a close connection with the subject. Can this message template now be removed?

1030:. The short answer, which you may likely already know, is that if there are no sources to back it up, then it shouldn't be added to the article. If you're feeling particularly generous, you may try to find sources to back up the claim on your own, and add it to the article once you've found them. If you don't have time for an independent search, the editor doesn't seem to be able to understand our 2115:. You should take Joe Roe's comments to heart. Autobiographies come under intense scrutiny here. In addition, your draft has four references. Only the first is of any value for establishing notabilty. The other three are not independent and therefore are worthless for establishing notabilty. Using references like those three is a strong signal to reviewers that your draft is not acceptable. 1159:

you read WP:Articles for deletion/The Homes of Football you'll see that quite a number of accounts were under suspicion, including HomesOfFootball and StuartRoyClarke, so even if you have no connection with the subject it appears that other contributors do have, so the message template to which you refer seems justified. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

3167:. Those who get turned down at their first submission do receive helpful feedback as to the things that need addressing to make it acceptable for submission. Doing it that route avoids the new editor restrictions currently in place, and you could simply copy from your sandbox over into the new 'Draft' that the wizard makes for you. Hope this helps. Regards from the UK, 1592:, states "Quotations must be verifiably attributed, and the wording of the quoted text should be faithfully reproduced". I understand that some people dislike starting sentences with a conjunction, but 1.) there's nothing wrong with that; and 2.) you're quoting from the reference. I see nothing wrong with it. In regards to contacting the editor, I'd say to 3250:. You can resubmit your draft for review using the "Resubmit" button. I have not studied the draft to see whether or not it would be acceptable in its current form; but I will caution that comparing with other articles is not a fruitful endeavour, because unfortunately many of our five million articles are substandard, and we don't want to encourage more. -- 1745:. What the company thinks about itself DOES NOT matter in the slightest, unless it is notable for a reason pertaining directly to their self-opinion (ie, a company has a negative self-view, things like that). Second, you use the word "we". You are editing from an IP address, but if you do register an account for creating this article, please note that 258:. But to distil all these links into one sentence: please don't continue with this draft. This is an encyclopaedia, not a LinkedIn substitute. Surely you can see how having artists' entries written by their managers undermines people's confidence in our reliability and objectivity? If Ravell is notable, a volunteer will create the article in time. – 853:

to read and apply before you resubmit your draft. In addition, the style of writing, layout, and the way you have actually inserted these rather weak references is also not yet of a quality, style or format acceptable for an encyclopaedia entry. So my advice is to keep it draft form for now. Focus on the sources - if you can't find

1565:

in the magazine. Here's the exact sentence from the magazine. "And the October 9 episode received 18.2 million viewers, making it the most watched of any primetime program that week - beating out NCIS and The Big Bang Theory."One more question. Is there a way to get in touch directly with the editor who removed a contribution?

835:, and I know you must be frustrated from having two rejections. But, honestly, there really are a lot of big problems you still need to address before what you have written could ever be accepted into the main area of Knowledge (XXG) (aka mainspace). The clues are in the helpful feedback left for you by two separate reviewers at 3014:). Whenever you create a new article or edit an existing article, it will be mercilessly evaluated and possibly changed by others. It's just the way Knowledge (XXG) works. I see that in some cases where articles you created were tagged for speedy deletion, it was removed by someone else who disagreed with the criteria. 2876:

due to disruptive editing. Every article has a talk page, which you can reach by clicking the "Talk" tab at the upper left menu of the page. Open a new section and describe exactly what you want to change and furnish the new language that you want to add. Provide links to reliable sources that verify

2083:

However, I'm afraid there's a bigger problem: you appear to be writing an article about yourself. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopaedia. As I'm sure you can appreciate, an encyclopaedia where subjects regularly write their own biographies would not have a very good reputation. Creating autobiographical

2011:

reference sounded promising when I first read your comment, but it consists of saying, in an obituary, that a person named John Grant "was a founding member of the Zumbyes singing group at Amherst College." That is not significant coverage and is instead what experienced Knowledge (XXG) editors often

1681:

It seems unfair that only larger business seem notable enough for a profile - they will naturally accrue MSM coverage - in the modern context it's TOTALLY correlated to financial clout or fundraising record. What because I've not needed to raise institutional money, I can't make something notable? It

1491:

information Knowledge (XXG) is interested in is what has been published in reliable places (such as major newspapers or news-sites, or books from reputable publishers) by people who have no connection with the subject. If several people who are not known to them have written reviews or articles about

1274:

Hard to say - the average edit count per day is in the region of 40,000 at the moment, but most editors will make multiple edits over the course of a single day. Assume your average editor makes around 10 edits per day, that would mean that the answer to your question is in the region of 4,000 people

1158:

My interpretation of the edit history is that it's nothing to do with your edits, but because of someone claiming to be Stuart Roy Clarke editing the article. - X201 (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC) (edit conflict) The tag on Stuart Roy Clarke was not specifically referring to your involvement. If

1137:

However, I am finding Knowledge (XXG) to be a bit a of confusing and somewhat intimidating space to work. The argument on the WP:Articles for deletion/The Homes of Football page about Clarke's notability deteriorated into quite a harsh argument between two contributors. Clarke is notable. Google him.

1108:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. I'm not sure which pages you are referring to, but if you don't feel comfortable editing the articles you want to, you may post what you wish to do on the article talk page of the articles you want to make changes to. If you click "Talk" at the top of the article,

839:

which you need to read, understand and act upon. I have looked at all your online references and cannot find anything other than the merest passing mention of Adam Fell, if at all. Unless you have used some non-online sources which cover him in depth - or I've missed something because of the lateness

3379:

there's a warning noticeon the page saying that it's not supported on mobiles or tablets, or if Javascript is not enabled, or if you're using an earlier browser version earier than IE10. Perhaps you could also tell us what device you're using, please? I can see you had two goes at getting started as

1564:

I recently contributed a sentence to the article The Good Doctor" (TV series). I saw that my quote was removed saying "it's never a good idea to begin a sentence with "And". The direct quote I added began with "And". What do I do in a case like that? I was simply trying to stay true to the quote

852:

of our guidance. Can you honestly say your references show "in depth coverage"? I can't. The fact that Quincy Jones calls him his "right hand man" simply isn't good enough to merit an article on him here. Maybe it's OK for LinkedIn. The feedback you received gave clear links to the guidance you need

3017:

In some cases I think you have confused deletion tags with maintenance tags; the maintenance tags are in yellow and merely indicate an issue that needs to be resolved. Deletion tags are in red. It's important to understand that most users cannot delete pages by themselves. Only administrators can

3005:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. I'm sorry you have not had a good experience here. I will say that writing a new article is probably the hardest thing to do on Knowledge (XXG). It takes time, practice, and effort. Looking at your user talk page it appears that you have had at least one article

2982:

I am few months old on Knowledge (XXG) I am struggling with Knowledge (XXG) guidelines whenever I create new page some people put 'speedy deletetion request' it's very hard for me right now to go ahead as a free Knowledge (XXG) volunteer it's feel like losing my time on Knowledge (XXG) because here

2367:

hurdle right from the start. If you decide to have another go at enhancing and re-submitting your article, I'd suggest leaving out the very long table of updates, and just referring to where a user can find update information via one or two references. Removing this table would, in my opinion, make

2167:

We welcome new editors here who are unfamiliar with Knowledge (XXG), and are always pleased to help them. I was surprised to see that, after posting your incisive observation, you had deleted two large help threads from other users. None of us find this helpful, so please don't do that again. (Your

1823:

Please go search "Komal" and you will find the main article being of an actor's bio and info. It used to be that of a name and its meanings and origins. I would tired to move the actor's info as titling it as "Komal (actor)" but it got rejected. Here's the only list of articles with "Komal" in them

1790:

I have written several articles about relatively small businesses. In all cases, these were well-established and quite distinctive businesses that had received significant coverage in reliable independent sources over quite a few years. And I had no connection with any of these companies, except as

1631:

tab and looking to see which editors made the change. After their name you'll see a talk link in brackets. Click that to go to their Talk page, than click the Add Topic tab to start a new section on their page. Give it a sensible title (usually the article name) and politely ask about their changes

1459:

I've working on an article recently about a Youtube channel, dshermz. It's a smaller channel so there are not many resources for information about the channel. Luckily, this youtuber happens to go to my school and I got an interview. I was hoping to publish a wikipedia article on who he is and some

1147:

Remove message template: A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. Hello, Last month I posted in the Tea Room regarding the message templates on a page I was editing about a photographer: Stuart Roy Clarke. It was my first edit on Knowledge (XXG) and I

1133:

Hello there, Thanks for replies on this topic so far. I have one last question regarding my first edit on Stuart Roy Clarke's page. The problem - the reason for two message templates - has been identified as someone who edited or created the source before me. Something I have no control over. So,

294:

I speak only for myself, but I did not take offense from your comments. However, these points we have brought up are extremely important and necessary in order to maintain Knowledge (XXG) as a neutral source of information. Managers posting about their clients generally does not fit in with what

1689:

Our page was neutral, suitably. I didn't publish it purely for the kudos. But as an insurance startup, establishing fact and trust and credibility are important. Why should a giant firm like Apple - renowned for squirrelling funds offshore to avoid taxation - enjoy the privilege of a page, merely

1622:

has suggested, I've looked at your edit and the revert and can see both sides of the concerns. And it's nothing major. Basically, what you inserted was not a quote from a person, but was really just a line from a magazine stating a fact. So the best thing I'd suggest is to rephrase it in your own

2262:

I created what I thought was very objective info, with sources that followed the guidelines. I was rejected for the topic not worthy of notability, please add notability and citations. From my perspective, I think that itself violates the basic wiki guidelines. Why should I toot the horn of this

582:

Please understand that having a page about your company is not necessarily a good thing. Knowledge (XXG) is not interested in what a company says about itself, or in how it wishes to be portrayed. We are only interested in what third parties state about it. You cannot lock any page about your

965:

Welcome to the Teahouse. I have just taken the liberty of creating your user page for you and adding a single line of text that you can remove or replace as you wish. The reason you got the message saying you hadn't got a Userpage was simply that you hadn't ever hit the Create page tab to start

199:

I mistakenly made this account with the username under the artist I represent. I'm the artist's manager, Anthony van Atten. Unfortunately I had not realized if it appears it's an autobiography one is writing on themselves it'd damage the possibility of the page being published. I can definitely

2768:

The 1890s penny dreadful treatment of the Spring-heeled Jack character as a masked avenger may have inspired some aspects of Zorro's heroic persona. Spring Heeled Jack was portrayed as a nobleman who created a flamboyant, masked alter ego to fight injustice, frequently demonstrated exceptional

806:

my page got declined and it said this was the reason why: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge (XXG) requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the

765:

I have been trying correct incorrect information and I have tried to delete unsourced edits from the 'Pakistan Army' Page under the Propaganda/(controversy) section, the edits have been done out of hate towards the Pakistan Army, with inaccurate and ridiculed information. How can I edit it and

335:

has been created for the all the wrong reasons and should be deleted for now (i.e. Blatantly promotional). They can always be resurrected 'if' Ravell becomes encyclopedically notable at some point in the future. Also the draft has no RS and we don't even know if Kat Bein released the image

147:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. I have added the appropriate template to allow you to submit the draft for review, but I would encourage you to not do so yet. Knowledge (XXG) is not a place for users to have social media-style pages about themselves; this is an encyclopedia, where article

3163:, and to avoid disappointment you would be better off adding a new section within that page. When/if you do think you are ready (and most editors here start off by learning how to edit by making small changes to existing articles), I would advise you to submit any new article with the 1791:

an occasional customer. Experienced editors tend to be highly skeptical of articles about start-ups, because of the obvious promotional motivation for writing them. In this case, you admit (which is admirable) that you are connected with this company. Therefore, you have an inherent

2712:

Why does it matter whats on my account. Why are you "admins" stalking me. Why is it that every time I submit an article to be reviewed it gets declined by the same people? And yes, I know that my username is named after Lil Uzi Vert. He's my favorite rapper. What do you expect?

1486:

says about themselves. An article about that youtuber or their channel should not include any information that has not been published in a reliable place: none. And it should include hardly any information that comes from the youtuber or their friends, family or associates. The

1365:

Greetings friends! I am here from nearly 3 months but have less than 50 edits in article section. I want to contribute to an article but do not find any article my type. Is there a category or something where stub articles are listed to I can freely edit them ? Waiting for your

840:

of the hour - there's nothing there that makes me agree with you that you are "using notable sources that aren't just mere mentions". They all are, and most don't mention him at all, but just support the existence of companies and products which you say he is associated with. (

785:

the information you are removing might not have references against them but have entire pages dedicated to them. I have opened a discussion on the talk page regrading your edits. Please refrain from editing disruptively on the page until your content removal have been resolved.

2358:

for starters. Whilst browsing through the results I ignored all those urls that looked like forums and personal blogs, seeking out more reliable-looking urls to review or magazine sites. Being fussy in this way can help you select the wheat from the chaff and get you over that

1460:

basic info about his channel. This would be helpful because it would be a recourse for information since I could not find any myself. My writing keeps being rejected due to a lack of sources cited and I don't know how to cite a private interview. Any help would be great.

1203:, and welcome to the Teahouse. Creating a new article is one of the more difficult tasks on Knowledge (XXG), and I always advise new editors to spend a few weeks or months editing existing articles and learning how Knowledge (XXG) works before they try it. Have you read 1632:

or reverts. Emails and text messages always sound far harsher or terse than we mean to be, so always consider how you word your question and respond to replies. A simple discussion tends to be informative and constructive. I hope this helps. Regards from the UK,

547:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. In short, you should not do so, at least as your page stands now. You seem to have a common misconception about what Knowledge (XXG) is. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, which hosts articles about subjects considered to be

343:). These days with computerized MIDI , lots of people are now recording artists and they have to do something special if to rise head and shoulders above the primeval pond of wanabies. Suggest to the OP that he is in the wrong place to promote his clients. 2816: 2523:

has been blocked for vandalism. It does not take the skills of a "hacker" to find that edit or any other. Every edit that a user makes can be seen easily by anyone, unless an administrator has hidden certain edits that violate policy in a major way.

1406:

which have many subcategories listing thousands of Knowledge (XXG) articles needing attention. From needing reference to general cleanup you'll find them subcategorized to specific problems they have and work on the ones you like. You can also visit

2658:

That's a little unusual but it doesn't do any harm. I don't see any benefit in involving yourself. Generally it's a good idea to avoid editing others' user pages unless you're sure they'll approve, or its absolutely necessary to prevent disruption.

1540:, and welcome to the Teahouse. Don't worry about not knowing everything about editing Knowledge (XXG): it is a huge beast. The answer is that you can name the reference the first time you use it, and thereafter refer to it by name. Please see 1492:

the channel, and had them published somewhere (not just their own blogs, or social media, but somewhere with a reputation for editorial control) then there can be an article based on those reviews. Otherwise, probably not. Please read about

1151:

I was a little disheartened after my first attempt at editing seemed to attract these message templates but am going to try again. I am going to address the citations issues on this page and hopefully the need for that message template too.

1884:

before it was first changed. So while there could be an article about the meaning of the name, there is absolutely nothing worth salvaging in the history of that article - better to start from scratch, and base it on reliable sources.

618:

Why on earth did you submit the draft for review, given what you were told above? Doing so was a waste of your time, but more significantly a waste of reviewers' time. More importantly than that, you were specifically told to look at

2903:

I see you are on the mobile version of the site which has no "Talk" tab. You can start by clicking "Desktop" at the bottom of the page, but after that it is easier to click the "View source" tab and follow the instructions there.

3218:

I've updated it with further content and links, used unbiased language based on feedback that was given and included greater information in comparison to similar Knowledge (XXG) articles on very similar subjects &/companies:

1920:

I feel as though it expresses the credibility of the group through its participation in well known competitions and being a part of well known albums and it is referenced by multiple legitimate sources. Thank you for your time!

1846:

Sometimes a user who wants to create an article on a topic of doubtful notability, realises that it is easier to find an existing but little-watched article and hijack it. I'll try to revert the article to its original subject.

2334:'s answer has prompted you to look for further reliable sources. A few days ago we answered another query about how to exclude recent results from Google and only look for older sources. You can read that (rather long) thread 2258:

I'm trying to add a page about a mac finance software. I've looked at a quite a few already on Wiki to get an idea of the format, and read up on the best practices. Some of those softwares already on wiki don't follow them ;)

1685:

Is this what the community wants? We're a specialist, and by the terms of our industry and practice, rare. Were we a creature, rarity would be a valuable factor. In fact, we would be the evolving fish, crawling from the goo!

1482:, and welcome to the Teahouse. I'm afraid that the reason you can't work out how to cite a private interview is that you may not cite a private interview. Please understand that Knowledge (XXG) has hardly any interest in what 2962:. It's quite possible that a template already exists for whatever it is you're trying to do. If you want to tell us more about what you want to achieve, somebody here may be able to offer further advice. Regards from the UK, 590:

If all you want to do is tell the world about your company, you will need to do so in a different forum such as social media. If you have independent sources that indicate how your company meets the notability guidelines at

1520:

I want to use the same reference twice in two separate parts of an article. I am getting two identical references at this point which is OK but seems unnecessary and perhaps would indicate that I don't know what I am

1832:. Not sure what's going on here, with several different editors involved, but it does appear that a valid article about the meaning of a name has been lost in the shuffle. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 3052:

Hi I added {dubious} to a statement, can't make it link to Talk#section, only to Talk page, instructions in inscrutable. This is minor and I'm sure that I'm missing something simple, but I like to do it correctly.

1109:

it will take you to the talk page where you can post your request just as you posted your comment here. Your sources do not need to be in English as long as they are independent of the subject and reliable, click on

1875:

I have looked through the revisions of the article before the first hijacking, and I disagree that it was a valid article - it was unsourced and consisted of personal interpretations of original research with some

3375:. Welcome to the Teahouse. Could you tell us what the message is that keeps repeating, please? Sometimes you have to scroll down to see the next action to follow. I should also point out that at the start of the 2266:

So I find some recent web mentions that should make "notability" for the software very clear. And now I am told they are not trustworthy? So help here, it's my first shot at actually making a wiki page. Thanks.

623:, yet you have continued to edit without making the required declaration. Doing so is a breach of the Wikimedia terms and conditions, and if you continue to do so you are liable to be blocked from editing. -- 583:

company to your preferred text, and you cannot prevent others from editing it. All information, good and bad, can be in a page about your company as long as it appears in an independent reliable source. See

2550:

Hello, I'm trying to edit the table of contents on the Basia Bulat page (one of the entries is in bold, for some reason), but I don't know how to do that. Please help!werewolf 15:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

156:. Please click on that link to review the guidelines. If you can demonstrate with independent sources that you meet at least one of them, please incorporate those changes into the draft before submitting it. 1034:, and would prefer to leave the edit request open, then you can probably just let them keep it open. Leaving it open just means that it's still in the queue of unanswered requests, and that editors on the 3150:

limiting page creation by brand new accounts like yours. You need to have been around for a few more days and to have made a few more edits. Secondly, your article is not ready to be published yet. The

901:

I have been editing on Knowledge (XXG) for about a month. When I click on my user ID at the top of my page, it is telling me I don't have a user page. Is the user page different from having a user name?

3018:

delete pages, and only within the process indicated by the deletion tag(either as the result of a discussion, a valid speedy deletion criteria, or an unexpired, uncontroversial Proposed Deletion).

2016:

that have professional editorial control and a reputation for accuracy and fact checking. I still do not see the type of coverage that would convince experienced uninvolved editors that this is a

939:- Yes, those are two different things. Your user page is where you can tell the community about yourself, your editing interests, etc. The Knowledge (XXG) Guidelines for this can be found at 389:. To answer you again, your sandbox is not part of the encyclopedia and as such will not show up in search engines. I think it needs much work before it is ready to be submitted; please read 1038:

are notified of it. That just makes it more likely that the editor will get a third opinion, and one that will mostly likely back up your attempt to explain our requirements for sources.

1777:(edit conflict) IP editor, this is your only edit to Knowledge (XXG) from this IP address, so there is no way for us to evaluate your draft. Please provide a link to the declined draft. 878: 3270:

I am trying to add references in in my sandbox (to be copied later in the page I created) ... but I failed. I do not get the use of templates Where do I find help? Thank you

1861:

I see that the first hijacking, to a village in Sri Lanka, was done on 2010 May 24. It was later re-hijacked to be about an actor. I don't feel competent to untangle this mess.

2095:. I strongly suggest you don't continue working on this draft. If you meet Knowledge (XXG)'s notability criteria, a volunteer editor will write an article about you in time. – 1059:

Thanks for that. He reverted again. I am leaving that topic, just requesting him to leave the edit request open. He hats the edit request also promptly calling it vandalism. --

766:

prevent it from being reverted, I have also had warning from another user for entering 'unconstructive edit' when I am just correcting 'Page Vandalism', Please can you advise?

2012:

call a "passing mention". That reference is of no value for establishing notabilty. You have removed some references and added others. The new references do not appear to be

2805: 1214:, I see that while you have started on some of the easy but superficial parts of the draft (the picture, the infobox) you have not really begun the important part, which is 2954:- welcome to the Teahouse. Creating templates is not for the faint-hearted, but a good place to start learning how to use and create them would be this introductory page: 861:

about Mr Fell, you should give up there. Of course, if you can find those sources, then you can work on putting the whole article in order. So then you might like to read

437:

Hi, I'd like to have someone review a draft article I've mocked up for Kara Goldin. How can I go about doing this? Here is the link if that helps speed the process:

177:

I would also encourage you to slim down the social media links you have posted; a link to an official website and a couple social media platforms is usually OK, but

2168:

edits have been reverted). Of course, if you do have a genuine question, you will need to be a little clearer before we are able to help you. Regards from the UK,

2080:

concern, as explained in the red box at the top of the page. There is a message on your user talk page about copyright infringement, but that is from back in 2012.

2729:

Plus, don't decline another one of my articles if I submit it for review. I know when I have enough information, references, and when I've cited enough sources. `

2454:

I don't know what to do because I am editing some pages to try and improve them and HostBot is saying I'm unconstructive. I am afraid my account will get banned.

491:

I have used Sandbox to practice writing a factual summary of what my company does. How can I transfer this text to make a page called Elgood Effective Learning?

3356:

in the wikipedia adventure i have done everything asked of me but it keeps repeating the same message. need to complete it for a college assignment please help

1650:

Thanks so much for your help. I guess I just felt that the information was so specific that I decided to quote it. Your suggestions are very much appreciated!

571:). You should review WP:COI as soon as possible. If you are employed by this company, you will also need to review and comply with the paid editing policy at 132: 943:. To create a userpage, click on the user ID on the top of your page (*as you described above*) and edit /almost/ to your hearts content. Hope this helps. - 810:

i am using notable sources and these arent just mere mentions, ive already refernced the golden role and the beginners for citing and it is still not helping.

733:. Welcome to the Teahouse. The process involved in bringing a new group of like-minded wikipedia editors together into a Wikiproject is outlined on this page: 2745:

Barnstars are for achievements, not intentions. Otherwise, I could put on my resume that I have a Nobel Prize, because I hope to be awarded one before I die.

602:

I know I have given you a lot of information, and I apologize, but this is important. If you have other questions, please add them to this section. Thanks

200:

remove the social media links. I can certainly add more credentials and reference links. Will me having the artist's name as my username still be an issue?

163:

if you have not already. I would say that you are doing the correct thing by submitting a draft first, but you should be prepared to get feedback about it.

1824:

but no where a singular non referencing to any partcular person but of a name descriptive context can be found. Kpatelboston 17:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

1696:

I implore an editor kindly review or look at this, as naturally for our business, a wiki page would be a HUGE honour. Is there any kind of appeal process?

1011:, providing (forwarding) the references provided with the request ... he still disagrees and refuses to share any reference in support of his statement. -- 745:. Getting a brand new WikiProject going on a new topic is a great idea, but is not for the faint-hearted. It really takes commitment. Regards from the UK, 101: 93: 88: 76: 71: 63: 737:. But as you're a brand-new user, I'd really recommend getting familiar with the basics of editing Knowledge (XXG) collaboratively by either doing the 1819:

How do I bring up a page of a name that originally had the meanings and origins behind it in the description but was changed to an actor's bio instead?

579:

by Knowledge (XXG)'s Terms of Use(in other words, in order to be allowed to use Knowledge (XXG), you must comply with WP:PAID if you are a paid editor)

1988:

Just made a bunch of changes to the references in the article, includes some mentions from the New York Times and notable a cappella institutions.

1678:

We've received significant coverage from our peers and i've shared not just a couple, but over a dozen links from notable and independent sources.

3329: 2578:, and welcome to the Teahouse. The table of contents is automatically generated from the headings, so all you need to do is to remove the ''' 2799: 2769:

athletic and combative skills, maintained a hidden lair and was known to carve the letter "S" into walls with his rapier as a calling card.

456: 2857: 2628: 2566: 1699:

I fear this will shatter my faith in what the platform stands for. As it is, I don't understand the criteria's application in this case.

3033:

ya now i am felling little bit positive thanks 331dot you are the first one who can understand my situation thanks again and again:( :)

2148: 1833: 159:

I would also note that Knowledge (XXG) highly discourages users from creating autobiographies(though it is not forbidden). Please read

2837: 327:

Think we should let AnthonyvanAtten know, that he is always welcome to edit WP providing he abides by our editing policies. In my view

3155:

does not demonstrate with references that "Connected Car Commerce" is actually a widely accepted and used term, mentioned in depth by

1702: 984: 285: 205: 128: 2824:

character. Finding and adding a source is better than tagging an article for lack of a source, although it is more time consuming.

2343: 1227:

Make sure you do not use any evaluative language at all (such as "valuable") unless you a directly quoting an independent source.,

1217:

Find several reliably published sources where people who have no connection whatever with Yalameha have written in depth about him

2643:

has awarded themselves a whole bunch of barnstars. I am not sure of the etiquette of whether to just revert the edits. Thoughts?

1916:

Hi there! I'd really appreciate if someone could explain what exactly I need to change about this article to have it submitted.

1035: 414: 2955: 1091: 471:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. I will shortly add the appropriate template to your draft so you can submit it for review.

2232: 1497: 1204: 523: 21: 2772:

None of this information is on the Spring-heeled Jack wikipedia page and there is not even an 1890's penny dreadful listed.

2208: 1721: 1596:

them via the article's talk page, so that the conversation is in a centralized, but relevant, location. Hope this helps. -

1297:, i.e. registered editors that made at least one edit in the last month. It does not say how many made an edit in the last 1892: 1281: 1403: 862: 742: 519: 3136: 2368:

the page look far less promotional, and more like a short, factual encyclopaedic entry on what could well be a piece of

771: 2477:

are blatant vandalism. And you are correct that if you do not stop you will lose your editing privileges very shortly.

1741:. You would do well to read that. Also, there are two other things: one, Knowledge (XXG) includes articles on subjects 869:. It suggests you have a very close link with Quincy Jones Productions. Is this the case? If so, you must declare your 2939: 2648: 2058: 1627:. To contact an editor, first find out which one you want to discuss a matter with (such as a revert) by going to the 1324:

to the sound of everyone editing Knowledge (XXG) live, right now! Music to our ears. But if you do want more figures,

658: 496: 2338:

and give it a try. I gave it a go, and found a few other more reliable-looking and independent software reviews. Try

2047:

My recent article: 'Tristan Mackay' has been rejected very quickly apparently due to a clear copyright infringement.

1693:

I see no distinction and feel for professional equality, that in our sector, by any measure, we are indeed notable.

372: 42: 2228: 2085: 328: 281: 201: 142: 124: 3361: 3084:

part is unnecessary in this case, since the talk page is the only place you would be linking to anyway. Regards,

2794: 2409: 1164: 452: 2339: 2204: 1717: 1103: 1087: 507: 223: 2861: 2624: 2562: 1189: 925: 628: 531: 422: 235: 3181:

Follow up: I see your sandbox draft has used text you have copy/pasted from elsewhere. Be aware that you must

3127:

I have written the article and want to post. Yet don't know where the 'reveal' button to actually release it

1408: 1211: 734: 567:

for more information). That means it is likely difficult for you to write about your company with the proper

178: 2193: 1837: 2777: 2152: 2112: 2069: 2054: 1064: 1016: 988: 906: 782: 767: 542: 492: 2927: 2873: 2853: 2616: 2554: 2224: 2144: 1624: 1493: 646: 511: 444: 120: 117:

Once I've completed the page and all how do i make it go live and remove "draft" from the very top as well?

2644: 2491: 2441: 2073: 1764: 1706: 1264: 1160: 1052: 873:, according to our policies, as we tend to frown on articles being written by involved parties purely for 791: 3376: 2959: 1746: 1541: 1235:

Thank you for disclosing your conflict of interest; but that template should be placed on your User page

1084:

since most of them are bengali newspaper link. It's hard for me to publish the page or update the page.

738: 410: 3380:

you've got duplicate messages on your talk page. (These can be removed later on if you wish). Regards,

3317: 3236: 2909: 2750: 2220: 2189: 2164: 2050:

Considering I wrote this article entirely myself without any copy or paste, can someone please help me?

1993: 1926: 1081:

Hi I would like to update some Bangladeshi celebrities information in wikipedia. Are you able to help?

920:. Yes, having a userpage is very different from a username. You must create your userpage yourself; see 881:. Sorry this all must sound rather negative to you, but I hope it all makes sense. Regards from the UK, 2811: 2773: 2351: 2335: 1294: 940: 921: 866: 677: 51: 17: 3247: 3232: 3011: 2789: 2004: 1989: 1959: 1937: 1922: 1232:

When you have done that, you can add uncontroversial factual information from non-independent sources.

1181:

I try sometimes to make an article but I cant and finally directed to help page instead of edit page.

3385: 3372: 3357: 3190: 3172: 2967: 2885:

That will signal editors able to evaluate your request, and if appropriate, make the change for you.

2420: 2405: 2381: 2272: 2173: 1637: 1479: 1468: 1464: 1333: 971: 886: 832: 750: 466: 448: 3147: 3389: 3365: 3345: 3341: 3321: 3305: 3279: 3259: 3255: 3240: 3194: 3176: 3152: 3114: 3093: 3070: 3042: 3038: 3027: 2992: 2988: 2971: 2943: 2913: 2898: 2891: 2865: 2830: 2781: 2754: 2738: 2730: 2722: 2714: 2705: 2697: 2690: 2670: 2652: 2640: 2620: 2607: 2575: 2558: 2537: 2530: 2512: 2493: 2463: 2443: 2413: 2385: 2372:

for the Mac. I've not checked the sources in detail - that's your job - but if it does get through

2347: 2318: 2311: 2292: 2276: 2244: 2240: 2212: 2197: 2177: 2156: 2128: 2121: 2106: 2062: 2033: 2026: 1997: 1975: 1968: 1953: 1946: 1930: 1899: 1870: 1856: 1841: 1808: 1801: 1770: 1725: 1710: 1662: 1641: 1602: 1579: 1553: 1549: 1530: 1509: 1505: 1472: 1446: 1423: 1384: 1352: 1337: 1311: 1286: 1268: 1248: 1244: 1236: 1200: 1193: 1185: 1168: 1122: 1095: 1068: 1054: 1020: 992: 975: 949: 930: 910: 890: 821: 795: 775: 754: 723: 689: 685: 662: 632: 624: 611: 587:

for more information(it is about people, but the principle is the same). Please keep this in mind.

535: 527: 500: 480: 426: 418: 402: 386: 352: 318: 304: 289: 269: 239: 231: 209: 190: 172: 1537: 1522: 828: 813: 332: 3143: 3128: 3110: 3089: 3066: 2734: 2718: 2701: 2508: 2459: 1732: 1609: 1439: 1419: 1377: 1060: 1027: 1012: 962: 956: 936: 917: 902: 380: 364: 3292:

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Information on how to cite sources can be found by clicking

2951: 2931: 2369: 1325: 874: 849: 671: 650: 584: 557: 3275: 2696:

Listen, I awarded myself those to set goals. I have high expectations for myself. Understand?

2685: 2665: 2478: 2428: 2101: 1895: 1866: 1852: 1753: 1526: 1279: 1260: 1039: 877:. If this is an issue, and you do plan to carry on editing this article, I'd suggest you read 817: 787: 719: 264: 3293: 2424: 1593: 845: 761:

Why do some editors get away with editing baseless and obsecure edits, and later revert them?

620: 572: 568: 515: 506:

I have added a submit button, but before submitting you need to make a declaration regarding

227: 160: 153: 3313: 3301: 3132: 3023: 2905: 2746: 2283: 1658: 1575: 1118: 966:

editing. So there was nothing there to be seen. Hope this makes sense. Regards from the UK,

607: 476: 398: 368: 314: 300: 186: 168: 3164: 2872:

Welcome to the Teahouse, IP editor. By "secure", I assume that you mean an article that is

2373: 2092: 1792: 1738: 1399: 870: 836: 596: 592: 564: 390: 255: 3381: 3186: 3168: 3007: 2963: 2935: 2377: 2325: 2298: 2268: 2169: 1675:

I've had our page request rejected for not being notable enough. But that feels spurious?

1633: 1329: 967: 882: 746: 654: 563:

If this is "your company", you have what Knowledge (XXG) calls a conflict of interest(see

348: 3312:

What type of citation do you want to create? Book. Academic journal? Newspaper? Website?

3156: 2364: 2013: 1402:

as such there is always work to do which we can never finish. There is general category,

1110: 854: 553: 149: 3222: 3337: 3251: 3034: 3000: 2984: 2886: 2825: 2525: 2331: 2306: 2236: 2116: 2021: 1963: 1941: 1796: 1751:. This does not apply to IP accounts, only because of the nature of their assignments. 1545: 1501: 1240: 696: 681: 2983:

on Knowledge (XXG) people don't respect eachother contribution they just delete. :( 🤒

2360: 2077: 2017: 1742: 1031: 999:

How to engage an editor who is insisting that his knowledge is above reliable sources?

560:

like merely telling the world about a company(you don't have to be selling something).

549: 3160: 3106: 3102: 3085: 3062: 2520: 2504: 2470: 2455: 2287: 1829: 1619: 1597: 1429: 1415: 1393: 1367: 1347: 944: 3333: 3287: 3271: 2680: 2676: 2660: 2096: 1887: 1862: 1848: 1306: 1276: 730: 715: 337: 259: 3352:

wikipedia adventure issues , repeating same messages when i have completes tasks

3297: 3019: 2583: 1654: 1615: 1585: 1571: 1302: 1114: 711: 603: 472: 394: 310: 296: 182: 164: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2817:

The Legend of Spring-heeled Jack: Victorian Urban Folklore and Popular Cultures

831:. Thanks for coming to the Teahouse to ask your question. I've taken a look at 599:

to submit a draft for review(after you comply with the policies I state above).

3228:

Any help is greatly appreciated as I truly believe this is a notable subject.

2850:

How do I correct a wrong information in a secure article in Knowledge (XXG)?

344: 3057:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Twins_in_mythology&oldid=809668032

2846:

How do I correct a wrong information in a secure article in Knowledge (XXG)?

2355: 841: 2400:

How do you referenced items at the bottom of the page? What are the steps?

152:

to meet notability guidelines, in this case those for musicians located at

844:

is the best source I could find, and it's nowhere near enough to meet our

2302: 1748:

it is strictly forbidden for an account to represent more than one person

1220:

Forget every single thing you know about him, and write an article based

1003:

I do not know where to turn to. This editor reverted an edit I did for a

385:

You asked this a couple weeks ago, and got an answer, which you can read

1589: 1328:

is a good starting point for further information. Regards from the UK,

2958:, plus this set of links to more detailed help and technical advice: 3213: 1917: 595:

and feel you can write an appropriate article, you will need to use

438: 2821: 2301:. Your draft article has four references. Only the first one, to 2765:

Specifically I am referring to the entry on Zorro which states:

2582:''' from the relevant heading. I've made that change for you. 2188:

i want to know that how to submit a blog or website on wikipedia

1301:, nor does it count the number of non-registered ("IP") users. 3010:) and another moved to Draft space so you can work on it more( 363:

why isn't my page live? how do i index it and make it go live

29: 2613:

Thank you very much! werewolf 01:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

2376:

next time, you can send us all cookies! Regards from the UK,

1317: 3185:

use you own wording to write articles, and not copy others.

2820:

that describes Spring-heeled Jack as an inspiration for the

879:

Knowledge (XXG):Plain and simple conflict of interest guide

2924:

Hey, could someone please tell me how to make a template

2203:

What do you mean? As in for a reference or a new article?

1155:

Best, Encyclopediadia (talk) 11:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

3223:

https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_spacecraft_manufacturers

2877:

the new content. Add the following template to your post:

680:. There is a section there that shows how to give one. 2040:

Incorrect Copyright Infringement given as refusal reason

3077: 3056: 2474: 1881: 1275:

editing per day. But that's a very approximate figure.

1008: 1004: 924:. However, some editors choose not to have a userpage. 222:

You must immediately make the declaration required for

181:

or other place to list all your social media accounts.

3210:

How can I get my article approved? Draft: Clyde Space

643:

Could someone please tell me how to award a barnstar

114:

Basically the subject line. Any help is appreciated.

1743:

that have been covered in reliable, secondary sources

1346:

Well that wasted a good 20 minutes of my day... :) -

309:

I now see your username change went through, thanks.

409:

You also need to read further specific advice about

280:

My apologies. I did not mean to offend anyone here.

254:

You will also need to familiarise yourself with the

1880:peculiar opinions thrown in and presented as fact. 1411:for more on that. I Hope you'll find this helpful. 1303:

There are 29k of them on en-wp as of September 2017

2141:The smartest people on earth he know every ting. 393:for more information on what is being looked for. 1737:This sounds like an extremely clear cut case of 1568:Thank you for your help. I'm still learning! 2184:how to submit a blog aur website on wikipedia ? 3159:. And thirdly, there is already an article on 1668:Small Business - big in our sector/ notability 1560:I had a submission removed and have a question 441:Arnold.kevin729 16:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 1716:Would you kindly share what the business is? 1682:feels anti-competitive for the little-guys. 983:Thanks all for the advice and the help. Lois 8: 2473:. You are being reverted because edits like 865:. Finally, I am rather concerned about your 897:why does wikipedia say I have no user page? 341:if Kat is a woman -my unreserved apologies 226:. You must also change your user name, see 3214:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Clyde_Space 2925: 2851: 2614: 2552: 2142: 1918:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:The_Zumbyes 644: 442: 439:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Kara_Goldin 118: 3146:- welcome. Firstly, there is currently a 3006:successfully enter the main encyclopedia( 2675:I have however notified them about their 2251:Not sure why my citations are unreliable 339:– he did not certainly submit an OTRS ( 148:subjects must be shown with independent 1828:Courtesy link to the page in question: 1795:which must also be taken into account. 1320:, then sit back with a cup of tea, and 1293:A metric that we have is the number of 1224:on what those independent sources say. 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2425:tutorial on referencing for beginners 110:How to make a wikipedia page go live? 7: 1962:since I made a typo the first time. 2500:How did you find my edit??? HACKER! 3203:How can I get my article approved? 3122: 2814:. Here is a link to a book called 743:this guidance on creating articles 179:Knowledge (XXG) is not a link farm 28: 2761:How to tag with "citation needed" 1184:what can I do for making article? 2450:HostBot keeps reverting my posts 2423:. You may want to check out our 1404:Category:Knowledge (XXG) backlog 1316:Or, forget the numbers. Why not 846:notability guidelines for people 710:hi. imma Xze. how do I create a 33: 2956:Help:A quick guide to templates 552:and supported with independent 510:, & you need to read about 2546:How to edit table of contents? 2068:I think you must be mistaken, 706:How do I create a WikiProject? 1: 3390:12:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3366:10:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3346:11:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3322:11:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3306:10:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3280:10:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3260:10:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3241:09:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3195:09:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3177:09:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3137:08:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3115:07:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3094:00:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 3071:17:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 3043:02:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 3028:20:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2993:19:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2972:14:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2944:13:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2914:11:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2899:07:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2866:07:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2838:02:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2806:02:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2782:01:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2755:01:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC) 2739:15:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2723:15:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2706:15:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2608:15:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2538:17:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2513:17:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2494:17:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2464:17:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2444:14:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2414:14:31, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2386:12:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2319:05:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2293:21:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2277:21:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2245:11:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2213:17:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2198:17:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2178:10:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2157:08:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2129:04:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2107:19:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2063:18:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 2034:03:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC) 2014:reliable, independent sources 1900:22:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1871:22:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1857:22:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1842:21:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1809:17:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1771:17:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1726:17:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1711:17:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1663:17:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1642:17:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1603:16:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1580:16:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1554:16:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1531:15:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1510:16:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1473:15:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1447:15:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1424:15:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1385:13:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1353:14:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1338:12:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1312:12:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1287:12:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1269:11:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1249:12:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1194:11:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1169:10:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1123:09:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1096:05:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 1069:05:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 993:03:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 891:03:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 822:00:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 796:01:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 776:01:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 755:00:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 724:00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC) 358: 2691:21:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 2671:20:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 2653:20:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 1998:18:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 1976:07:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 1954:07:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 1931:04:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 1818: 1055:11:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 1021:09:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 976:22:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 950:22:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 931:22:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 911:22:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 857:that have genuinely written 855:reliable third party sources 690:20:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 663:19:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 633:19:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 612:11:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 536:11:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 501:11:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 487:Make public page from Sanbox 481:16:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 427:16:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 403:16:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 373:16:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 353:16:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 329:User:Ravell (Musical Artist) 319:15:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 305:15:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 290:15:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 270:14:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 240:14:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 210:14:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 191:14:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 173:14:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 3165:Article for Creation wizard 2093:conflict of interest policy 1882:This is what it looked like 1409:Knowledge (XXG):Task Center 1259:how many people edit a day? 1255:how many people edit a day? 1129:Help with template messages 1032:standards for verifiability 735:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject 256:conflict of interest policy 3406: 2255:I'm a mac software nerd. 2076:was declined because of a 1625:Knowledge (XXG):Quotations 1113:to learn more about this. 1007:. After bringing it up on 3330:referencing for beginners 2960:Knowledge (XXG):Templates 2810:Welcome to the Teahouse, 2297:Welcome to the Teahouse, 1936:Welcome to the Teahouse, 1618:. If I could add to what 1077:Updating information Help 3123:can't find reveal button 2920:How to create a template 2636:Awarding self barnstars! 2111:Welcome to the Teahouse, 1455:Publishing a New Article 1239:, not in the article. -- 1212:Draft:Ahmadreza Yalameha 922:Knowledge (XXG):Userpage 848:.) Do look carefully at 18:Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse 2205:Emir of Knowledge (XXG) 1718:Emir of Knowledge (XXG) 1690:based on their size? 1588:- the Manual of Style, 1516:references newbie user 1428:Ok I will try my best.— 359:why isn't my page live? 143:Ravell (Musical Artist) 125:Ravell (Musical Artist) 3266:Hon to add references? 2084:articles is therefore 842:This article you cited 3153:draft in your sandbox 1398:Knowledge (XXG) is a 1104:Jannatul.tasneem.moon 1088:Jannatul.tasneem.moon 837:Articles for Creation 597:Articles for Creation 569:neutral point of view 524:WP:Your first article 46:of past discussions. 2787:Use the {{cn}} tag. 1793:conflict of interest 871:conflict of interest 558:promotional purposes 2370:noteworthy software 1237:User:A.R.Rostamzade 1036:English IRC channel 927:White Arabian Filly 863:WP:Yourfirstarticle 415:circular references 2404:Mary Jane Doerr 2233:your first article 1498:your first article 1400:a work in progress 1205:your first article 783:CorrectionLab 3000 768:CorrectionLab 3000 556:. It is not for 391:Your First Article 3148:trial in progress 3048:talk link Dubious 2946: 2930:comment added by 2881:{{request edit}} 2868: 2856:comment added by 2689: 2669: 2645:Curb Safe Charmer 2632: 2619:comment added by 2570: 2557:comment added by 2159: 2147:comment added by 2113:Tristanmackay1982 2105: 2070:Tristanmackay1982 2055:Tristanmackay1982 1912:Article Declined? 1898: 1767: 1736: 1613: 960: 665: 649:comment added by 543:Christopherelgood 493:Christopherelgood 460: 447:comment added by 433:New Article Draft 268: 136: 123:comment added by 107: 106: 58: 57: 52:current main page 3397: 3291: 3157:reliable sources 3083: 3012:Draft:Regular.li 3004: 2896: 2894:Let's discuss it 2835: 2833:Let's discuss it 2802: 2797: 2792: 2683: 2663: 2604: 2603: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2588: 2535: 2533:Let's discuss it 2489: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2439: 2438: 2435: 2432: 2329: 2316: 2314:Let's discuss it 2284:Draft:Banktivity 2126: 2124:Let's discuss it 2099: 2031: 2029:Let's discuss it 1973: 1971:Let's discuss it 1951: 1949:Let's discuss it 1891: 1806: 1804:Let's discuss it 1769: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1756: 1730: 1607: 1444: 1436: 1433: 1397: 1382: 1374: 1371: 1309: 1107: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1043: 954: 928: 700: 675: 554:reliable sources 546: 520:reliable sources 470: 387:by clicking this 384: 262: 150:reliable sources 146: 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 3405: 3404: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3373:Redrobinwedding 3358:Redrobinwedding 3354: 3285: 3268: 3205: 3125: 3081: 3050: 3008:Mahendra Mewati 2998: 2980: 2922: 2892: 2882: 2848: 2831: 2800: 2795: 2790: 2763: 2638: 2601: 2598: 2595: 2592: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2548: 2531: 2486: 2483: 2480: 2479: 2452: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2429: 2421:Mary Jane Doerr 2406:Mary Jane Doerr 2398: 2365:reliable source 2323: 2312: 2253: 2186: 2139: 2122: 2042: 2027: 1969: 1947: 1914: 1821: 1802: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1752: 1670: 1562: 1518: 1457: 1440: 1434: 1431: 1391: 1378: 1372: 1369: 1363: 1318:Click this link 1307: 1284: 1257: 1176: 1161:Encyclopediadia 1131: 1101: 1079: 1047: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1001: 926: 899: 850:this subsection 833:Draft:Adam_Fell 804: 763: 708: 694: 669: 641: 540: 489: 467:Arnold.kevin729 464: 449:Arnold.kevin729 435: 378: 361: 140: 112: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3403: 3401: 3393: 3392: 3353: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3325: 3324: 3309: 3308: 3267: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3231:Many thanks, 3227: 3204: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3124: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3097: 3096: 3049: 3046: 3031: 3030: 3015: 2979: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2921: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2901: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2858:105.112.44.236 2847: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2762: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2742: 2741: 2726: 2725: 2694: 2693: 2673: 2637: 2634: 2621:Revirvlkodlaku 2611: 2610: 2576:Revirvlkodlaku 2559:Revirvlkodlaku 2547: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2496: 2451: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2403: 2397: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2252: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2216: 2215: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2138: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2081: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2009:New York Times 1986: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1913: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1728: 1669: 1666: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1561: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1456: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1341: 1340: 1314: 1295:active editors 1290: 1289: 1282: 1256: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1218: 1208: 1201:A.R.Rostamzade 1186:A.R.Rostamzade 1175: 1172: 1144: 1141: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1000: 997: 996: 995: 980: 979: 952: 933: 898: 895: 894: 893: 803: 800: 799: 798: 762: 759: 758: 757: 741:or by reading 707: 704: 703: 702: 692: 640: 637: 636: 635: 625:David Biddulph 616: 615: 614: 600: 588: 580: 561: 528:David Biddulph 488: 485: 484: 483: 434: 431: 430: 429: 419:David Biddulph 406: 405: 360: 357: 356: 355: 324: 323: 322: 321: 307: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 232:David Biddulph 215: 214: 213: 212: 194: 193: 175: 157: 111: 108: 105: 104: 99: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3402: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3326: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3289: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3229: 3225: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3215: 3211: 3208: 3202: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3161:Connected car 3158: 3154: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3105:, Thank you. 3104: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3079: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3059: 3058: 3054: 3047: 3045: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3016: 3013: 3009: 3002: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2902: 2900: 2897: 2895: 2890: 2889: 2884: 2883: 2875: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2845: 2839: 2836: 2834: 2829: 2828: 2823: 2819: 2818: 2813: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2804: 2803: 2798: 2793: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2770: 2766: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2743: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2692: 2687: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2672: 2667: 2662: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2635: 2633: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2609: 2606: 2605: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2545: 2539: 2536: 2534: 2529: 2528: 2522: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2499: 2498: 2495: 2492: 2490: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2449: 2445: 2442: 2440: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2401: 2395: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2366: 2362: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2330:. Hopefully, 2327: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2317: 2315: 2310: 2309: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2291: 2290: 2285: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2229:verifiability 2226: 2222: 2221:Dainik Tricks 2218: 2217: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190:Dainik Tricks 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2166: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2149:223.16.67.235 2146: 2136: 2130: 2127: 2125: 2120: 2119: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2103: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2088: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2051: 2048: 2045: 2039: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2025: 2024: 2019: 2015: 2010: 2006: 2003:Hello again, 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1983: 1982: 1977: 1974: 1972: 1967: 1966: 1961: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1952: 1950: 1945: 1944: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1919: 1911: 1901: 1897: 1894: 1893:contributions 1890: 1889: 1883: 1879: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1834:90.200.138.27 1831: 1830:Komal (actor) 1827: 1826: 1825: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1800: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1763: 1750: 1749: 1744: 1740: 1734: 1733:edit conflict 1729: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1676: 1673: 1667: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1649: 1648: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1630: 1626: 1621: 1617: 1611: 1610:edit conflict 1606: 1605: 1604: 1601: 1600: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1490: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1454: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1438: 1437: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1405: 1401: 1395: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1376: 1375: 1360: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1280: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1231: 1226: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1182: 1179: 1173: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1156: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1105: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1076: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 981: 977: 973: 969: 964: 963:LADscribe1355 958: 957:edit conflict 953: 951: 948: 947: 942: 938: 937:LADscribe1355 934: 932: 929: 923: 919: 918:LADscribe1355 915: 914: 913: 912: 908: 904: 903:LADscribe1355 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 851: 847: 843: 838: 834: 830: 826: 825: 824: 823: 819: 815: 811: 808: 801: 797: 793: 789: 784: 780: 779: 778: 777: 773: 769: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 727: 726: 725: 721: 717: 713: 705: 698: 693: 691: 687: 683: 679: 673: 668: 667: 666: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 598: 594: 589: 586: 581: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 559: 555: 551: 544: 539: 538: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 504: 503: 502: 498: 494: 486: 482: 478: 474: 468: 463: 462: 461: 458: 454: 450: 446: 440: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 382: 377: 376: 375: 374: 370: 366: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 325: 320: 316: 312: 308: 306: 302: 298: 293: 292: 291: 287: 283: 279: 278: 271: 266: 261: 257: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 211: 207: 203: 198: 197: 196: 195: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 151: 144: 139: 138: 137: 134: 130: 126: 122: 115: 109: 103: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3355: 3269: 3230: 3226: 3221: 3217: 3212: 3209: 3206: 3182: 3126: 3060: 3055: 3051: 3032: 2981: 2978:Hi need help 2926:— Preceding 2923: 2893: 2887: 2852:— Preceding 2849: 2832: 2826: 2815: 2812:Cowboyleland 2788: 2774:Cowboyleland 2771: 2767: 2764: 2695: 2639: 2615:— Preceding 2612: 2584: 2579: 2553:— Preceding 2549: 2532: 2526: 2503: 2453: 2402: 2399: 2313: 2307: 2288: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2254: 2187: 2143:— Preceding 2140: 2123: 2117: 2086: 2052: 2049: 2046: 2043: 2028: 2022: 2008: 1987: 1970: 1964: 1948: 1942: 1915: 1886: 1877: 1822: 1803: 1797: 1747: 1703:89.197.12.27 1701: 1698: 1695: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1677: 1674: 1671: 1653: 1629:View History 1628: 1598: 1570: 1567: 1563: 1542:WP:NAMEDREFS 1519: 1488: 1483: 1463:Thanks, Lily 1462: 1458: 1441: 1430: 1412: 1379: 1368: 1364: 1361:Contribution 1348: 1321: 1298: 1261:Poppytree123 1258: 1221: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1174:make article 1157: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1005:Edit Request 1002: 985:74.72.182.71 945: 900: 858: 812: 809: 805: 788:Adamgerber80 764: 739:WP:ADVENTURE 709: 645:— Preceding 642: 576: 508:paid editing 490: 443:— Preceding 436: 362: 340: 333:Draft:Ravell 224:paid editing 119:— Preceding 116: 113: 82: 47: 41: 3314:David notMD 3248:Libby.Hoban 3233:LIbby.Hoban 3207:Hi there, 3076:Fixed with 2906:PrimeHunter 2747:David notMD 2396:referencing 2089:discouraged 2005:Jrubenstein 1990:Jrubenstein 1960:Jrubenstein 1938:Jrubenstein 1923:Jrubenstein 1766:(Channel 2) 1210:Looking at 941:WP:UserPage 712:WikiProject 678:WP:BARNSTAR 575:, which is 102:Archive 695 94:Archive 692 89:Archive 691 83:Archive 690 77:Archive 689 72:Archive 688 64:Archive 685 40:This is an 3382:Nick Moyes 3187:Nick Moyes 3169:Nick Moyes 2964:Nick Moyes 2378:Nick Moyes 2361:notability 2326:Lotusborn1 2299:Lotusborn1 2269:Lotusborn1 2263:product? 2225:notability 2170:Nick Moyes 2091:under our 2078:notability 2074:Your draft 1984:@Cullen328 1634:Nick Moyes 1494:notability 1480:Lilyg73440 1465:Lilyg73440 1330:Nick Moyes 968:Nick Moyes 883:Nick Moyes 747:Nick Moyes 516:references 512:notability 413:and about 3377:Adventure 3338:ColinFine 3252:ColinFine 3078:this edit 3035:Sumitmpsd 3001:Sumitmpsd 2985:Sumitmpsd 2874:protected 2708:LilUzi25 2332:Cullen328 2237:ColinFine 2053:Tristan. 1546:ColinFine 1502:ColinFine 1241:ColinFine 875:promotion 802:wiki page 697:RudolfRed 682:RudolfRed 411:bare URLs 22:Questions 3107:GeeBee60 3063:GeeBee60 2940:contribs 2928:unsigned 2854:unsigned 2731:LilUzi25 2715:LilUzi25 2698:LilUzi25 2677:username 2641:LilUzi25 2629:contribs 2617:unsigned 2567:contribs 2555:unsigned 2521:Iqra Ali 2505:Iqra Ali 2475:this one 2471:Iqra Ali 2456:Iqra Ali 2303:Macworld 2289:NsTaGaTr 2282:Link is 2145:unsigned 2087:strongly 1958:Pinging 1620:NsTaGaTr 1599:NsTaGaTr 1416:Ammarpad 1394:Big Hero 1390:Welcome 1349:NsTaGaTr 1326:WP:STATS 1009:his page 946:NsTaGaTr 867:Username 859:in depth 676:Look at 659:contribs 647:unsigned 639:Barnstar 585:WP:PROUD 577:required 522:, & 457:contribs 445:unsigned 133:contribs 121:unsigned 20:‎ | 3334:Mtl-371 3294:WP:CITE 3288:Mtl-371 3272:Mtl-371 3246:Hello, 3061:Thanks 2219:Hello, 2165:IP User 2163:Hello, 2020:topic. 2018:notable 1888:bonadea 1863:Maproom 1849:Maproom 1614:Hello, 1594:WP:Ping 1590:MOS:PMC 1538:Mosesos 1536:Hello, 1523:Mosesos 1478:Hello, 1366:answer— 1308:Tigraan 1277:Yunshui 1199:Hello, 829:Qjp2000 827:Hello, 814:Qjp2000 731:Xzelion 716:Xzelion 701:Thanks. 621:WP:PAID 573:WP:PAID 550:notable 228:WP:CHUS 161:WP:AUTO 154:WP:BAND 43:archive 3332:help, 3298:331dot 3183:always 3144:Mj kim 3129:Mj kim 3080:– The 3020:331dot 2950:Hello 2888:Cullen 2827:Cullen 2527:Cullen 2374:WP:AfC 2308:Cullen 2231:, and 2137:Pokman 2118:Cullen 2023:Cullen 2007:. The 1965:Cullen 1943:Cullen 1798:Cullen 1761:insane 1739:WP:COI 1655:Mjr524 1616:Mjr524 1586:Mjr524 1572:Mjr524 1521:doing. 1484:anyone 1322:Listen 1115:331dot 604:331dot 593:WP:ORG 565:WP:COI 473:331dot 395:331dot 381:NitaSa 365:NitaSa 311:331dot 297:331dot 282:Ravell 202:Ravell 183:331dot 165:331dot 3328:Does 3103:Dairy 3086:Dairy 3082:talk# 2952:TMN81 2932:TMN81 2822:Zorro 2796:waste 2791:Don't 1755:-A la 1672:Hi, 1111:WP:RS 961::Hi, 672:TMN81 651:TMN81 345:Aspro 331:& 16:< 3386:talk 3362:talk 3342:talk 3336:? -- 3318:talk 3302:talk 3276:talk 3256:talk 3237:talk 3191:talk 3173:talk 3133:talk 3111:talk 3090:talk 3067:talk 3039:talk 3024:talk 2989:talk 2968:talk 2936:talk 2910:talk 2862:talk 2801:Time 2778:talk 2751:talk 2735:talk 2719:talk 2702:talk 2686:talk 2679:. – 2666:talk 2649:talk 2625:talk 2580:bold 2563:talk 2509:talk 2469:Hey 2460:talk 2419:Hey 2410:talk 2382:talk 2363:and 2356:here 2354:and 2352:here 2348:here 2344:here 2340:here 2336:here 2273:talk 2241:talk 2235:. -- 2209:talk 2194:talk 2174:talk 2153:talk 2102:talk 2059:talk 2044:Hi. 1994:talk 1927:talk 1896:talk 1878:very 1867:talk 1853:talk 1838:talk 1722:talk 1707:talk 1659:talk 1638:talk 1576:talk 1550:talk 1544:. -- 1527:talk 1506:talk 1500:. -- 1496:and 1489:only 1469:talk 1442:Hero 1420:talk 1380:Hero 1334:talk 1265:talk 1245:talk 1222:only 1190:talk 1165:talk 1119:talk 1092:talk 1065:talk 1026:Hey 1017:talk 989:talk 972:talk 935:(ec) 907:talk 887:talk 818:talk 792:talk 772:talk 751:talk 720:talk 686:talk 655:talk 629:talk 608:talk 532:talk 526:. -- 497:talk 477:talk 453:talk 423:talk 417:. -- 399:talk 369:talk 349:talk 315:talk 301:talk 286:talk 265:talk 236:talk 230:. -- 206:talk 187:talk 169:talk 129:talk 3371:Hi 3142:HI 2681:Joe 2661:Joe 2574:Hi 2097:Joe 1299:day 1178:Hi 916:Hi 781:Hi 729:Hi 260:Joe 3388:) 3364:) 3344:) 3320:) 3304:) 3296:. 3278:) 3258:) 3239:) 3193:) 3175:) 3135:) 3113:) 3092:} 3069:) 3041:) 3026:) 2991:) 2970:) 2942:) 2938:• 2912:) 2864:) 2780:) 2753:) 2737:) 2721:) 2704:) 2659:– 2651:) 2631:) 2627:• 2569:) 2565:• 2511:) 2462:) 2427:. 2412:) 2384:) 2350:, 2346:, 2342:. 2286:- 2275:) 2243:) 2227:, 2211:) 2196:) 2176:) 2155:) 2072:. 2061:) 1996:) 1929:) 1885:-- 1869:) 1855:) 1840:) 1758:d 1724:) 1709:) 1661:) 1640:) 1578:) 1552:) 1529:) 1508:) 1471:) 1435:ig 1422:) 1373:ig 1336:) 1305:. 1267:) 1247:) 1192:) 1167:) 1121:) 1094:) 1067:) 1019:) 991:) 974:) 909:) 889:) 820:) 794:) 774:) 753:) 722:) 714:? 688:) 661:) 657:• 631:) 610:) 534:) 518:, 514:, 499:) 479:) 459:) 455:• 425:) 401:) 371:) 351:) 317:) 303:) 288:) 238:) 208:) 189:) 171:) 135:) 131:• 98:→ 68:← 3384:( 3360:( 3340:( 3316:( 3300:( 3290:: 3286:@ 3274:( 3254:( 3235:( 3189:( 3171:( 3131:( 3109:( 3088:{ 3065:( 3037:( 3022:( 3003:: 2999:@ 2987:( 2966:( 2934:( 2908:( 2860:( 2776:( 2749:( 2733:( 2717:( 2700:( 2688:) 2684:( 2668:) 2664:( 2647:( 2623:( 2602:s 2599:r 2596:i 2593:f 2590:b 2587:D 2561:( 2507:( 2487:G 2484:M 2481:G 2458:( 2437:G 2434:M 2431:G 2408:( 2380:( 2328:: 2324:@ 2271:( 2239:( 2207:( 2192:( 2172:( 2151:( 2104:) 2100:( 2057:( 1992:( 1925:( 1865:( 1851:( 1836:( 1735:) 1731:( 1720:( 1705:( 1657:( 1636:( 1612:) 1608:( 1574:( 1548:( 1525:( 1504:( 1467:( 1432:B 1418:( 1413:— 1396:: 1392:@ 1370:B 1332:( 1283:水 1263:( 1243:( 1207:? 1188:( 1163:( 1117:( 1106:: 1102:@ 1090:( 1063:( 1061:G 1048:G 1045:M 1042:G 1028:G 1015:( 1013:G 987:( 978:. 970:( 959:) 955:( 905:( 885:( 816:( 790:( 770:( 749:( 718:( 699:: 695:@ 684:( 674:: 670:@ 653:( 627:( 606:( 545:: 541:@ 530:( 495:( 475:( 469:: 465:@ 451:( 421:( 397:( 383:: 379:@ 367:( 347:( 313:( 299:( 284:( 267:) 263:( 234:( 204:( 185:( 167:( 145:: 141:@ 127:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 690 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index