Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 926

1829:, First, you aren't talking too much. You are asking some very good questions. I agree with you that the quote function in footnotes should be used more often. I say this as someone who hasn't used it often but I'm going to make an effort to try to use it more. That said, use it with care. there is no exemption with respect to copyright (unfortunately), so make sure to use a short enough quote that it doesn't fall afoul of our copyright policy. In some cases, you might feel that it takes a long passage to support the point, but a short quote will help solve one of the other issues you raised — on a long page it may not be obvious which passages meant and a short quote is included the reader can search for that short quote and feel comfortable they are in the right section of the page. This can be even more important on some documents which are long and do not have page numbers. 3192:, in my experience majority of articles that we do get about TV Celebs in India always contain personal statements or words . The only articles where personal statements aren't present are where the actor or actress in question wasn't successfully contacted... So is there anything else to do about it? I read somewhere on Knowledge itself that in such cases a person could combine such references and create something like a unified reference which in turn may help attain notability , is this true , because I see very little chances of finding articles without a personal statement for TV celebs generally (in India) . So is there any way to go about it now , as this isn't the only draft I want to edit and I am putting of editing others as I want to go about it one draft/article at a time. Thanks . 617:"You have to tone this down. It is over the top promotional with tons of buzzwords and hype. Also you need to declare any WP:COI. I could have this quickly deleted as SPAM as it is." I understand that was their opinion - but I was hopeful since you helped to correct this issue - I could just ask them to modify the comment so it was not so alarming. That is all. Just wanted to know if it is appropriate to even ask. I have absolutely no intentions of offending or challenging anyone - and most certainly not you. You've been very patient and most helpful to me and I really do appreciate the information and participating that you've very generously provided!. I was surprised to receive the message 1708:, a note on the above. Whereas it's fine to copy info into Word to spell check it, it will not work to copy from Word to Wikimedia software. There are invisible formatting artifacts that will copy with it if you copy from Word to Wikimedia software, and it is a pain in the rear to remove them. If you compose offline, use a non formatted word processor like Notepad. Also, a further addition regarding ENGVAR. If you start a new article on a British topic it's best to use British English. If you start an article on a US topic, use US English. If the topic is international in nature, then you can use your choice. 369:'s wiki page and I've been trying to add the award she's been nominated for in the Kids' Choice Awards. The thing is I can't figure out how to control the rowspan so that it the Stranger Things column continues down to the award. I've been searching things up tirelessly but i can't seem to find any information on how to actually use the rowspan code part. Does anyone know how to continue this rowspan and could give me a small crash course on it? thank you so much!! P.S. I also don't know how to center the reference- how would i do that? i added the 'textaligncenter' bit but it's still not working. 1887:

is that content changes all the time. An image that might have been used for some years could, one day, be replaced with a completely different one, or simply removed as unnecessary, or the whole article restructured or rewritten. So, it's really unwise to try to link text and images in the way you allude to. One of them is bound to be changed sooner or later, and would bound to cause confusion. What we do is use images and write captions for them that stand on their own merits, yet which nevertheless add to the encyclopaedic value of the text on the page. Does that make sense?

1347:. I understand now much better how this linking works. However, without wanting to lack respect, I am not convinced that it is a good idea to force these aristos to just use surnames as you say. In fact, I changed the "last" parameter back from Rouvroy to Saint-Simon, because I fear that most readers will not understand. The memoirs that I cite are generally known as the "Memoirs of Saint Simon" and not as the "Memoirs of Rouvroy". If I understand it right, the Manual of Style instructs us to use the title and not the surname when writing about noblemen. 1553:

FA requires an article be nominated and another editor conduct a review process, identifying weaknesses of the article in question and requiring fixes. Before a GA or FA nomination, the editor intending the nomination is expected to do a lot to improve the article first. GAs and FAs can also be downgraded via a formal process. Lastly, many experienced editors work on a draft until it could be considered to be past Stub class. The person conducting the Article for Creation review might be willing to approve and rate it Start- or even C-class right away.

2192:, you need to chill. Everyone here is a volunteer just like you. Nick correctly answered your question. He didn't accuse you of anything he didn't threaten you with any consequences. He informed you. If you didn't like his tone, which I see no problem with, perhaps you may wish to reflect on the fact that no one who edits here at Teahouse has any obligation to do so. And also perhaps reflect that your question was answered for someone else immediately above. We are peers here dude, not employees. No one has to answer any questions here. 2015:, Numbering images is harder than it might sound, for reasons that have been mentioned above. In short, virtually all articles are works in progress, and inclusion of a new image anywhere other than at the end of an article would require renumbering, unless the software were revised to do automatic numbering and renumbering. I'll echo the comments of Marchjuly — you can achieve the goal by adding a unique text caption, which is probably a good idea on its own merits, and would make it relatively easy to refer to a specific image. 2271:.Finally, one last thing to remember is that it is the person who takes a photo, not the subject of the photo, who is generally considered to hold the copyright over said photo. So, the copyright of that photo is held by the photographer who took it, not Retford himself. The fact that he posted the photo in a Tweet does not make him the copyright holder, and he cannot really give you permission to release the photo under a free license even if he wanted to without first getting the permission of original photographer. -- 767:. Your draft includes the following language: "provides solutions to automate the complex workflows and tasks required to collect, manage, and market content". There is absolutely zero useful encyclopedic content in those 16 empty words. That style of writing should be relegated to promotional brochures although I doubt that those anodyne, uninformative words would be effective even in a company pamphlet or on a company website. Read and study about our core content policy, the 1429:

separated) and CS2 (point separated) in the list of references. There are many thorny details in this rule where an editor might be accused of disrespect to the established style. - Besides I see that you double-space after points (periods) when you write is that recommended? - I am not so sure how to seek consensus: by writing a note on the article's talk page? or do you also need to write on the talk page of the user who added the first citation? With many thanks

1018:

use it here on Knowledge. Random photos that you find online taken in the last 95 years are likely to be restricted by copyright and if so, cannot be used on Knowledge. Photos first published before 1924 are copyright free and can be used anywhere. Photos that are the work of the US government and its employees are copyright free and can be used freely. That is just a brief introduction to a very complicated area of editing. Please give us the specifics.

35: 1293:

the parameters should always be listed in the same fixed order, but the template documentation (e.g. cite book and citation) do not seem to prescribe a standard sequence of parameters. I simply think it does not look nice (or professional) in the code when editors add source descriptions which show different orders of parameters (e.g., url at the end or after the title). The "efn" template should be recommended for explanatory notes.

2683:. It is not a repository of its users' creative efforts or descriptions thereof. If you had any familiarity with Knowledge, you would realize that there is a vast gulf between "that anyone can edit" and "that anyone can post in". Who recommended that you offer your "movie article" to Knowledge? They were seriously mistaken, it seems. Sorry, but you will need to find another venue more suited to your requirements.-- 3047:, which you have created and put an almost empty infobox in. Please don't spend time on infoboxes and images at the moment: they are the little touches which finish an article, but a page with only images and an infobox is worthless. Almost all the value in a Knowledge article lies in the well-written, neutral text, based on citations to reliable published sources. Everything else is a minor detail. 262:

so, by the time I've worked out where all the punctuation ought to be placed around all the numerous sub-clauses so as to not confuse the reader, I find someone else had made a far more effective and succinct reply ahead of me. And then if I'm brief, someone takes offence. Can't win. But what I have done is deploy the Beta test gadget called 'Two column edit conflict' at

3158:. The first two references are substantial, and may or may not be reliable, I don't know. But they are not independent of the subject, since they are based on her words. They could be used as references for the fact that she said something, but not for the content of what she said (and her having said it may or may not be encyclopaedic). But they cannot contribute to 1795:

must have had access. I feel he should have quoted the relevant passage. Another reason to quote is that in some works pages are huge and without quote it becomes difficult to decide which passage on the page might have been intended. On the other hand having a quote also makes it easier to identify which piece of information in the text is supported by the reference.

1127:

give credibility on her training and her prominence in her field). I would like to use Dr. for the other researchers she has worked with in the past (there are a few) and they do not have their own wikipedia pages (so I cannot add a wiki link to their full name). Would it be more appropriate to use Dr. or use PhD following the researcher's name? (as mentioned in

688:. Most likely this was just done by accident, and I've restored the post back to original location. Just try and be a bit more careful because moving another's post might disrupt the flow of the discussion and take things out of proper context. It might, in some cases, also be seen a sort of "editing" of another's post which we should really try and avoid per 2438: 2321: 2756:. Welcome to the Teahouse. The simple answer, I'm sure is 'No'. But where are you seeing it and are you actually logged in at the time you're editing? I thought CAPTCHA was only commonly experienced when editing as an IP. I don't think I've ever encountered it whilst logged in. But were you adding external links to articles? If so, maybe 2210:, which is totally understandable for Teahouse regulars who see copyright queries everyday, but can be a surprising answer for someone totally unaware of copyright basics. So I see where DG got the impression of being shouted at. That being said, it was certainly not rude and DG might have overreacted. Let's all forget that, shall we? 427:

more experienced editors. I wanted to ask you if it is appropriate to request for a reviewer to remove their comment from an article - if another editor assisted to address their concerns? The article is . To me it looks like a red flag and the tone in the comment was not my intention for this article. Thank you!

2538:

was speedily deleted as not conforming with our policies. Furthermore, the reason for its deletion is that it was regarded as a Hoax. Now, I'm not an administrator here, so I can't view the deleted content, but a quick Google search shows me you were trying to promote a YouTube video clip that has so

1987:

issues for people using machine readers. The same thing can be said for numbering because there's no way to ensure the numbering remains consistent, esepcially for articles that are frequently edited, and trying to do so might be seen as more of a personal preference than something in accordance with

1853:

Images are not numbered in Knowledge. I find it difficult to refer to an image in the text. The text is sometimes a better place than the caption to discuss information that can be gleaned from the image. WP:CAPTION does not seem to forbid Figure numbers, but I have not found an article yet that does

1811:

Once again, I tend to agree with you. I have mixed feelings about seeing quotations within a reference/footnote. There are obviously copyright issues over long quotes, and a bad-faith editor can potentially create a false quotation. But, in general, my own view is that these would be helpful...and I

1552:

So as not to be seen as congratulating oneself, editors who put in a lot of work improving an article tend to not also upgrade it. Any editor can upgrade from Stub to Start to C-Class to B-class, although if articles have glaring shortfalls, a subsequent editor is free to downgrade. Getting to GA and

1428:

Dear Martin of Sheffield, thank you for alerting me to the danger of changing an article from CS1 to CS2. I know from WP:CITEVAR that one should adhere to the cutation style established by the first reference added unless this style is changed by consensus. I must admit that I forgot about CS1 (comma

1351:

prescribes: 'A member of the nobility may be referred to by title if that form of address would have been the customary way to refer to him or her; for example Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester, may become "the Earl of Leicester", "the Earl", or just "Leicester" in subsequent mentions.' For me the

1126:

I understand that the title 'Dr.' should not be used unless the person is known best by that name (i.e Dr. Phil). However, I am currently editing an article about a researcher. The researcher has received a lot of training from other researchers in the field, and they are mentioned in the article (to

529:

My comment (under the reviewer's comment) was to make clear that the draft has undergone MAJOR changes after the first submission was declined. This was intended to suggest that the next reviewer evaluate this as a fresh start. I had also suggested a declaration of not PAID and the nature of the COI,

321:

I have a death certificate for an infant buried in the Spring Hill, TN cemetery by the TN Children’s Home (sites as place of death) in 1933. I’m having trouble editing the site, however, it is inaccurate if it does not include this infant born 4-25-1933 died 9-26-1933; buried Spring Hill, TN cemetery

266:

which seems to make seeing one's edit conflicts a little easier. Now, regarding red links - just get rid of any redlinked article in 'See also' as, clearly, there's nothing to see. Had the article link actually been useful to the page it was on, then maybe you could have tried to find the source data

3226:

has its source guide, and you would do better to ask there. As for IWMBuzz: now that I've looked at it, and seen "We are committed to make your business grow", I believe it is (entirely appropriately) completely focussed on its clients' needs, and therefore not a source that Knowledge would count as

2141:

Likewise. But, just an afterthought for you: If he's on Twitter, why not tweet to him and ask him to upload to Wikimedia Commons a selfie for the whole world to use? He can't give you one of his own images for you to upload on his behalf - as we need it to be properly licenced - though he could post

1886:

replies here. They can go on foreveeeeeer! Oh, and Wilkommen to the Teahouse. Erm, as scientists, we're used to reading journals that refer to Fig 1, Fig, 2 and so on, and that's really helpful on a static page. We know precisely what to look at and when. The problem with a user-edited encyclopaedia

1794:

I feel that quotes in the footnote are not used often enough. References often cite a source like "A Smith, 2010, p345". The reference might be a recent book that is difficult to access unless you buy it and the reference is therefore difficult to verify. The editor who added the reference obviously

1748:

Templates like "More citations needed" display warnings indicating that the article has some shortcoming, e.g. does not have enough references. Having done something to fix a shortcoming should I remove this warning? I feel that somebody else should do it as I am now biased. Un unbiased person might

1638:

Yes, true. Sensible section headings help users find the right information that they need. I've set my system up so that each heading and sub-heading is numbered, thus allowing me to navigate more easily within a long page. (For example, this subsection currently appears as 66.4 when I view it. I've

426:

I am a new editor attempting to create a new article. When attempting to do so, I did not realize that this was not a recommended practice for new editors; however, it has been very helpful to have the guidance from the Teahouse to help navigate the process and to have the opportunity to learn from

1535:

Articles should be created as stubs and then be assessed and improved. After substantial improvement they should be promoted to Start-Class, C-Class, B-Class, GA, A-Class and finally Featured Article. This does not seem to happen. Who should do all these assessments and promotions? Probably not the

1483:

I still wonder how you can join a project. Do you need to be invited? Do you simply barge in by adding yourself to the list of users of the project? There are a lot of local projects. In my case that is Project Northern Ireland as that is where I live. Such local projects could eventually take over

1328:

Dear Martin of Sheffield, thank you for fixing my link problem on "Jean-Antoine de Mesmes (1640-1709)". It seems to me that the link is on the parameters "last=" and "date=". I also looked at Siege of Derry and got it going there by changing from "cite book" to "citation" template. It seems it must

1292:

and then the "reflist" template but changed to "sfn", "reflist" and a list of sources below it that should perhaps appear between "refbegin" and "refend". Originally I used "cite book", "cite web" etc. to describe the sources but later changed to "citation" template for all types of sources. I feel

1017:

contains over 50 million freely licensed images that you can use on Knowledge (or elsewhere) with no restrictions other than attribution in some cases. If you have taken a photo of something that is not itself copyrighted, then you can upload that photo to Wikimedia Commons under a free license and

567:

thus far. To be quite frank with you, it is not an unreasonable conclusion to wonder whether you are here solely to promote one article and will disappear once the goal has been achieved. You have not made even a single edit to improve one other existing article thus far in your Knowledge career. I

2258:

because it is almost always deemed possible for a free image to be either created or found to serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. Most photos you'll find online are going to be assumed to be protected by copyright, unless it clearly states otherwise; if it says nothing about

1769:

Yes, if you address the issue flagged up by the notice, then feel free to remove it. Another editor can always add it back in if they feel you haven't addressed the key statements that still need citations. Complex or contentious pages contains many 'factual' statements; each needs to be supported

1289:

I feel that Knowledge provides too many ways of citing sources. Ideally I think that there should be a Knowledge house style for citations. I know that has been discussed and rejected, see WP:CITEVAR. I feel that the "sfn" and the "citation" templates should be recommended for newbies. The variety

1189:

Any blocked user remains blocked until the term of their block has expired, irrespective of how many user accounts or IP addresses they attempt to use. If you see identical patterns of editing from a blocked user and then subsequently from other new accounts or IP addresses, you should collate the

1074:

It appears to me that this organization's short existence illustrates its noble intent, but time is required for it to accomplish enough to be written about in mainstream sources. Knowledge should not be used to assist the promotion of your organization; it's a perverse motivation. The cart should

954:

says, "Historically, the Klan used terrorism—both physical assault and murder—against groups or individuals whom they opposed." Isn't that clear enough for you? What more do you want? Please be aware that there have been three distinct waves of Ku Klux Klan activity in the United States, with many

823:

The United States never declared war on Vietnam. I think the term would be a ¨police action¨ ...to label the action as The Vietnam War is incorrect. Millions of Vietnamese were killed during our occupation of their nation, and i think it should be at least noted on your page that we never declared

261:

Yeah, it can be really annoying to have worked up an answer to someone, only to find you can't post it because someone else has just posted to that thread or article before you. It happens to me a lot because I tend to write interminably long, complex, yet hopefully, helpful, replies to people and

3111:

It would be quite helpful if someone could confirm if these could count as significant coverage so that I can add them to the draft and please explain with their respective numbers why it did or didn't count as significant coverage. I am still on shaky grounds in this matter. Thank you for taking

2445:

I've also removed the multiple external links which I think are unnecessary and too promotional. Could you fix he 'Background' section? It's a bit of a wall of unreadable text. Try splitting it up to tease out notability and add references or removed unreferenced content. The lead should say more

1500:

There is no formal 'joining up' process. You can either add your name to their 'participants' list, or simply just align yourself with their activities and ambitions. Projects are very good places to give specialised advice on a topic, and the Hosts here often send people to specific Projects for

442:

The short answer to your question is no. All the comments will be removed when and if the article is published to the encyclopedia itself. Draftspace is not indexed to search engines, so effectively no one but you and other Knowledge editors that are aware of the draft will see them. They are not

1690:

But... Be aware that Knowledge has several different spelling conventions (UK, US etc). If starting an article from scratch, that's not a problem - you can write using whichever national convention you normally use and set the spell checker accordingly. But, when editing or adding to an existing

926:

PLEASE EDIT THE ENTRY AS TO WHAT THEY ARE A TERRORIST GROUP NO WHERE ON THE LISTING DOES IT SHOW THAT IT WAS DESIGNATED A TERRORIST GROUP 2 TIMES YOU ARE GLORIFYING AND PUTTING THIS GROUP ON A PLATTER BY NOT STATING THAT THEY WERE A TERRORIST GROUP NOT ONCE BUT TWO TIMES I LOOKED UP ALL THE

2661:, independent sources. If you can demonstrate that by supplying reliable references to verify everything you want to say about it, then we would welcome your contributions. But home made videos fall well short of our encyclopaedic standards, I'm afraid, so until they become famous, it is simply 1614:

The Contents template is automatically added to articles that have more than 3 sections. The Content box always lists all headings. The Content box therefore can become very long and this may discourage editors from adding deeper levels of subdivisions. Sometimes the citation apparatus with its

344:

Hello IP editor. Welcome to Knowledge's Teahouse where we help users having problems editing articles on this encyclopaedia. Forgive me, please, if I've misunderstood your question, but does this relate to a specific Knowledge page, or are you trying to change content on another website? If the

117:

I am not a new editor but always appreciate Teahouse's advice when I get stuck. I know I can challenge deletion of an article but I'd like to first read it before I challenge the deletion. The topic seems important enough but the content may or or may not be useful. I've tried to track down the

3134:

as the discussion that led to the creation of this list was in 2015 while IWMBuzz(Indian Wiki Media) was created only in 2017. So can someone please check if IWMBuzz could count as a reliable source ? There were other publications as well but they already were discussed on and I couldn't find

1982:

I don't think it's a very good idea at all to add location/numerical identifiers either to image captions or to inline references to images, and a properly captioned and inserted image shouldn't require such a thing to be done. If there are concerns that an image's location or description is

1675:

I know what you're saying, but many browsers like Firefox and Chrome (to name but two) allow built-in spellcheckers which can assist you with that task. (A nifty trick, if you're aiming for the highest quality work when you're editing, is to save your edits and copy the displayed page into a

568:

find that odd. Typically (and this doesn't necessarily apply to you) these are the actions of single-minded editors who are trying to take advantage of Knowledge. You have no need to be so defensive; just edit the article and gain some experience of editing other live pages. Why not try

1166:

If an account is abused and blocked, then the user returns as a "dynamic" IP and a sock, with one IP being blocked, and, finally, the user comes back a third time with a dynamic IP and has the same behavior and language, are they welcome back to Knowledge? Or are they considered still

176:, thanks for landing at the Teahouse. Should we offer you tea, or nectar? The purely 'Knowledge' answer is that you can't see a deleted page unless you're an admin, or request a copy of an article to be emailed to you by an admin. One off-wiki way to see deleted articles is often via 1211:, all edits, IP or not, that definitely originate from a blocked account should be reverted. If you believe that the edit is indisputably useful, then make the edit on your own behalf, and be prepared to take full responsibility for it. Any blocked editor who wants to resume editing 1104:. Yes it exists, of that we can be certain, but you simply need to find greater coverage in other sources if you are to have any chance of successfully creating a page here. Many small don't and never will meet that criteria - but that's not to say they don't do great work. Regards, 2358:

has got two banners and I believe it is because editors believed me to have a personal connection with the subject. I have declared my lack of connection to subject on my user page. Please can you let me know how to proceed in cleaning the page, how the process works? Thank you!

1462:

Dear Martin of Sheffield, I did not want to attack you on the double-spacing. It is good to know about this, it probable is another thing that one should not edit and should probably be then done consistently through an article. I learned a lot from you. Thank you so much. Bye.

1013:. Image use policy is one of the most complex areas of editing Knowledge, so it is difficult to answer a vague non-specific question. I will give you some general guidelines but we can give you a more specific answer if you ask a more specific question about a specific picture. 118:

article following different internal WP links. I can go to "Category:Knowledge administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles", where there is a list of 122 different administrators and my eyes glaze over -- how many do I have to ask before I get the help I want?

2940:

If it's a one-off type thing, it won't affect you at all (for example, my first edits were reverted! I'm fine now) but if you make a habit of being reverted, editors will begin to view you as a time sink, and you may be blocked, or held in a generally unfavorable opinion.

1368:

You are quite correct, the link is formed from the last name (or all of the last names for multiple authors) and the date, prefixed by CITEREF. For instance the link for your last comment would be CITEREFSchade2019. In general you should avoid mixing or changing

927:

AFRICAN AMERICAN GROUPS, MUSLIM GROUPS . YOUR EDITORS MADE SURE TO LABEL THEM AS TERRORIST WITH YEAR .. PLEASE DO THE SAME FOR THIS GROUP IT IS A FACT NOT AN OPINON THE KKK IS A TERRORIST GROUP AND THEY SEEM TO GET A PASS FROM EVERYONE INCLUDING YOU GUYS

468:

Did you leave a message (John from Idegon left a message on you talk page in "March 2019" ...The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting topic.... I would like to respond but can't locate it? Did you delete

1983:

confusing to the reader, then perhaps the image should be moved, recaptioned, or even removed. People read Knowledge in all kinds of ways so an image that you see to the right side of some text may appear below the same text to someone else; there might also

746:. I'm trying to be as neutral as possible and only added the information that's from 3rd party sites for citations. However the comments still think it's not follow the guideline. Any tips, suggestions, or directions to go to will be super appreciated! 267:

for the list and linked to it in 'External links'. And another little tip for you: don't sign your posts by creating a new line... the convention is to just put the four tildes right at the end of the last sentence in a post. Like this. Cheers,

2984:

the article. If you are referring to your own preferences, I can't see them, but they only change menus and things like that, not the articles. And lastly, I see you are slightly active at fr.wiki- things are probably a bit more French there!

2582:

But why the ****, did you deleted, an movie which is in someone's imagination and don't care about it? Look, It doesn't even violate ANYTHING, It's just fan-made, I can also do this in IMDb, No offense, but still, It doesn't violate anything.

1448:, subsection 10.13.1). For monospaced type I always use a double space, it makes it much easier to read. Not surprising really, this is the style developed during the manual typewriter era for typewriters that are inherently monospaced. 2291:

Hi, please help me... I was creating a new article about the Romanian singer and vlogger Bibi, now the article is in draft. (the article has good sources). Please help me to publish the article on Wikpedia English. Thank you very much !

3166:

As for IWMBuzz: if it is a Wiki, then it is almost certainly not reliable. Unless the Wiki is limited so that only recognised experts can contribute, or it is strongly edited by professional editors, it will not be accepted as a source.

1268:

We don't normally get a volley of questions like these. I'd not realised they were from the same person (hence your comment at the end!). I've split them up into subheadings, so maybe they can be answered seperately under each section.

200:

is worthwhile. I would have thought that all we'd need was an external link to data like this from a page about beehives. Perhaps that why it was 'prod-ed'. No need to pester an admin when a good bit of Googling gets results! Regards,

2609:

Knowledge is an encyclopedia. It covers topics that have been discussed in reliable sources. Your madeup film has not and will never be. If you can get it into IMDb then that is on them. It still won't be allowed in Wikipeida.

2267:. In some cases, it may be possible for you to contact the copyright holder and ask them to release the image or an image under a free license; sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. You can find out some more about this at 2539:

far had 27 views (maybe 28 now I've looked at it). This is an encyclopaedia of notable subjects, not a repository to promote any old stuff that someone's put online. So that's the explanation, I'm afraid. You might like to read

1313:

I've run over the article for you. First I added standard headers to differentiate notes, references and citations. Next I've forced these aristos to just use surnames which fits the sfn/citation templates. Hope that helps,

1244:

First of all thank you very much for being here so that I have somebody to talk to. I started editing in September 2017, but I am still struggling with problems. Probably what I need is mostly is being redirected to the right

1443:

The WP manual of style covers this: "Software condenses two or more spaces to just one when rendering a page, so editors may use any spacing style they prefer (e.g., a single space or two spaces after a period/full stop ..."

1296:

I had problems with the "sfn" template in the article "Jean-Antoine de Mesmes (1640-1709)" where I cite passages in three volumes of Saint-Simon's Memoirs: The link between the notes and the references in the list does not

1579:

which involve a review and scrutiny process. I try to avoid creating stubs; I think any good editor using their sandbox to draft a new page ought really to be able to begin with a 'Start' class article at the very least.

2875:

I was actually very suspicious of this 'new' user because their initial editing - although of a positive nature - was extremely suggestive of some with prior experience here. I guess I wasn't alone in that conclusion.

799:! I removed as much as the promotional and empty language from the draft page, would you mind take a look at it again and if it is still not align with the standard. Really appreciated your time and feedback! Best, 713:

Yes I tried to move my response to be next to David's post as I was responding to his post. When I was writing it the other post wasn't there but appeared above when I published it. Thank you for correcting it

949:

Hello, IP editor. Typing in ALL CAPS is equivalent to shouting. Please don't do that. The first word of the name of that series of political groups is "Ku" rather than "Klu". The lead section of our article

558:

to see your single-minded edits to one article and wonder whether you were (or were not) using Knowledge to promote a personal interest, to the exclusion of all else. I often wonder whether an editor has a

2446:

clearly why this subject is notable. i.e. specify one or more significant awards that can be expanded upon later, but avoid using phrases like "award-winning", which means nothing. Hope this helps,

3106: 2120:

wow, keep your hair on. i didn’t upload it, did i? learn to respond to innocent questions without being rude. i expect a certain level of grace and etiquette from such an experienced editor... –

1916:

is the place to suggest changes; your own userpage is a good place to collate suggested improvements, until the time comes to unleash them upon an unsuspecting wikiworld. My own personal list is

934: 1639:

had it this way for so long I've temporarily forgotten how I set it up. Let me know if you're interested in doing that, and I'll nip off and refresh my memory. (Or somebody else may remind us).

1774:

article still has many elements unsupported by references. One should read through and consider each statement in turn. Are there citations to support each one? If not, it's under-referenced.

2259:

file licensing at all, then it's going to be assumed that it is a copyrighted image. So, you almost wouldn't be able to use any such images unless copyright holder of the image gives their

1515:

Dear Nick, thanks for your advice. I added myself to the list of participants of Knowledge project Northern ireland. I will see whether this leads to something. Thanks for encouraging me.

3096: 902:

known, even if that name is incomplete or technically incorrect. This conflict certainly was and is most commonly called "The Vietnam War", and it is not Knowledge's business to try to

831: 281:

And FWIW, I always delete red-linked entries that I come across on DAB pages, as well as entries on lists that can't be sourced. Those tend more often than not to be somewhat spammy.

2263:

and agrees to release the file under a free license that Knowledge accepts. Sometimes it can be hard to figure out how a files been licensed, so when in doubt you can ask for help at

3130:

I would also like to know if I can use references from IWMBuzz previously known as Indian Wiki Media . It isn't present in the the list of reliable sources from India i.e this page

1722:

Dear Nick Moyes, Emeraude John of Idegon, I found that the spellchecker in my Chrome browser was not switched on. Now I get unknown words underlined in red which is very helpful.

1100:, welcome to the Teahouse. Unfortunately, the three references you provided in the draft article are not sufficiently detailed, or in depth, to show that this charity meets our 1908:

Not wanting to appear rude, I had not realised every one of the above question were yours. Wow. Prizes for the longest TH post, eh? Maybe in future you'd consider just asking

3223: 3131: 1501:

that guidance. If you wish, you can even add a Project 'Userbox' to your main userpage to show which projects you support. (also forms a handy quick link to get there, too!)

2561:

It was definitely a hoax full of false claims about participation of real stars and production companies, and an alleged box office above the World record. It also violated

938: 2547:. (Sorry - that all sounds rather terse - it isn't meant to be. I just hope you appreciate we have set criteria for what is acceptable content here.) Best wishes, 3107:

https://www.indiawest.com/entertainment/television/ashi-singh-cuts-short-holiday-to-prepare-for-wedding-sequence/article_403905a0-294a-11e9-8d96-8f0d6e9f123f.html

1912:

questions about editing issues at the Teahouse. But I really welcome your comments, though it can be quite a drain to respond to general observations like these.

2035:

I talk about his portrait by Rigaud. I will just add a warning for future editors

1140: 345:

latter, I'm really sorry, but we have no way of helping you. If the former, could you please link to the Knowledge page you are concerned about? Many thanks,

1749:

find that the the fix does not go far enough (e.g. added too few references) or was of poor quality (e.g. the references were not not reliable). The article

835: 2657:). We only want Knowledge to grow, based upon quality factual content which meets our strict selection criteria, namely that a topic is covered in depth by 2620:

But I'm trying the website bigger with my fan-made feature-films, If you can let me make the website bigger, Let me make the fan-made films, No offense.

1484:

some of your Teahouse workload. They might be ready to go beyond this and really mentor newbies because the local project will be able to profit from it.

1061: 898:

Moreover, regardless of its status in US or International law, Knowledge articles by convention use as their title the term by which their subjects are

180:

which keeps copies of all the dross (and occasional good content!) that the community has decided to clear out from here. However, maybe because it was

3097:

https://www.dnaindia.com/television/report-yeh-un-dinon-ki-baat-hai-actress-ashi-singh-aka-naina-takes-a-break-from-her-reel-wedding-here-s-why-2722598

2268: 1536:

editor who did the essential improvement. What is the procedure to be followed? There seem to be big backlogs of articles to be assessed and promoted.

192:-ed, there isn't a copy on there that I can find. So what to do? Well, quite a few other sites like to mirror us, and I managed to find this for you: 2826: 2635: 2598: 2499: 101: 93: 88: 76: 71: 63: 2907:

Hi,if I write an article and it doesn’t get verified how does it affect my account or if I make change to an existing article and it was reverted

2922: 2562: 227:

has a couple of red ink links to the above-mentioned article and I'm not fully decided on how to proceed -- i'll probably just remove the links.

2540: 2031:

Dear Philbrick. You convince me. I will use captions and refer in the text to the image by some unique designation, for example in the article

998: 2760:

might give you an idea why it is still deployed. i.e. to defend against potential spam links being added automatically. Does this make sense?

2807:

for an explanation - they'll disappear after that time, and you'll just have to accept it if you do want to insert external links - sorry.

2543:

before attempting to add more content like that, as you'll simply be wasting your time trying. Maybe you might also like to take a look at

2095:

No, absolutely not!!! If you didn't take the picture, it's not yours to give away, is it? We take copyright violations very seriously so,

907: 329: 2254:

which is quite restrictive. One of these restrictions is that a non-free image of a still-living person is almost never ever allowed per

2144:"This photo of me may be freely used by others under a Creative Commons CC BY 3.0 licence. Please acknowledge Sam Retford as the source." 2465:

Great thanks, very helpful. Sure I'll edit the 'Background' section. Do you advise a list format for the awards instead of sentences?

872:

in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia . . . . It . . . was officially fought between North Vietnam and South Vietnam. . . . South Vietnam was

2032: 956: 508:

That is odd that you would post that because that is the attitude that I am up to no good - that I was referring to in the comment....

384: 289: 2980:

Looking at your edits, you have made two, one of which was this. The other edit is still the newest edit, so it should be there; try

2856: 685: 2679:

SuperMarioLoganFan, Knowledge is not in need of content, especially content such as what you are offering. Knowledge is in need of

530:

which you added to your User page. Again, intent to inform the next reviewer that a concern has been dealt with. Counsel patience.

2803:- a process of making a certain number of edits (which you have) and being registered for over 4 days (which you aren't yet). See 2665:. (Oh, and do keep the language polite - I hate having to edit another person's post - but yours needed it.) Regards from the UK, 2150:

could check and confirm the licencing, and we could then use it on Knowledge. But could he bothered? Only one way to find out...!

2307: 3162:, and only a small proportion of the article should depend on such sources. The third reference I cannot see, for legal reasons. 3101: 2799:

OK, I've just checked your contributions and I see you're a very new editor. I suspect this will disappear after you've become

906:

by misrepresenting the World as it was/is rather than how we would like it to be. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195}

3013:

Hello Iam Roosmi from damak can you tell me what can i upload any photo or video on my created page.please send your answer.

1042:

I have tried to submit the article with references which discuss the charity in depth (around 5) and i keep getting declined

2510:

Which article are you referring to? You can check the deletion log to find out why your article got deleted. Does this help?

196:- a simple count of world stocks that appears to have been extracted from www.fao.org. Hope this helps you decide whether a 1194:. It is possible to put blocks in entire IP ranges, though I'm not familiar with the details of how this is done. Regards, 1453: 1419: 1319: 742:

Hi Teahouse, thanks for giving us a place to ask questions first of all! I'm looking for help to improve my company page

3203: 3058: 3028: 2784: 2743: 2654: 2631: 2594: 2531: 2495: 1812:

should probably start doing it myself on the rare occasions I use references to real books, rather than online sources.

1568: 903: 21: 1344: 3050:

This is probably not what you want to hear; but the truth is that writing a Knowledge article that is of any value is

2918: 1057: 122: 2535: 2197: 1713: 1352:

learning curve for becoming a good Wikipedian is long and sometimes I get confused. With many thanks for your help

994: 488: 448: 42: 3092:

I would just like to know if these references would count as significant coverage and help ascertain notability.

2040: 1864: 1727: 1599: 1520: 1468: 1434: 1357: 1334: 1449: 1415: 1315: 333: 224: 1383:

templates, some editors get very worked up about CS1/CS2 differences. If the article you are working on uses

911: 2378:, welcome to the Teahouse. It sounds like your name should now be removed from the displayed list of alleged 2648: 2627: 2590: 2527: 2491: 2384:

I would like to declare my impersonal relationship with the Collective and it's founder Stephan Crasneanscki

1215:

submit a successful unblock request from their master account. All other edits by that person are invalid.

1131:

that you can use it if there needs to be clarification on their qualifications for the article). Thank you

3062: 2997: 2953: 2935: 2914: 2470: 2418: 2364: 380: 287: 2850: 2800: 2780: 2739: 2570: 2515: 2193: 1709: 1615:

headings Notes, References, Further reading etc. contributes more headings than the body of the article.

1558: 1010: 990: 855: 618: 606: 555: 535: 505: 499: 484: 465: 459: 444: 408: 154: 149:

My suggestion would be ask one administrator first. If they don't respond within 24 hours, ask another.

564: 563:

that they've not declared, and it's great that you did declare yours. Hence JfI's removal of his post.

1146:

The use of titles you describe is excessive. Such titles will (rightly) be removed by other editors.--

3016: 2910: 2881: 2812: 2804: 2765: 2702: 2688: 2684: 2670: 2623: 2586: 2552: 2544: 2487: 2451: 2410: 2395: 2355: 2333: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2155: 2104: 2036: 2021: 2012: 1973: 1936: 1925: 1903: 1892: 1875: 1860: 1835: 1826: 1817: 1799: 1779: 1757: 1723: 1705: 1681: 1663: 1644: 1633: 1619: 1595: 1585: 1540: 1516: 1506: 1488: 1464: 1430: 1353: 1330: 1301: 1274: 1263: 1249: 1208: 1199: 1184: 1172: 1168: 1151: 1147: 1109: 1080: 1076: 1045: 986: 930: 827: 804: 800: 764: 753: 749: 719: 671: 626: 577: 513: 474: 432: 372: 350: 325: 301: 272: 206: 238:

during some excited simultaneous edits a few weeks ago, this would've saved me a lot of frustration.

3259: 3240: 3236: 3180: 3176: 3148: 3124: 3074: 3070: 3044: 3032: 3002: 2958: 2926: 2885: 2862: 2816: 2769: 2706: 2692: 2674: 2639: 2614: 2602: 2574: 2556: 2519: 2511: 2503: 2474: 2455: 2422: 2399: 2368: 2337: 2311: 2280: 2276: 2216: 2201: 2184: 2159: 2129: 2108: 2082: 2044: 2026: 2001: 1997: 1977: 1963: 1929: 1896: 1868: 1840: 1821: 1802: 1783: 1760: 1731: 1717: 1700: 1685: 1666: 1648: 1622: 1603: 1589: 1562: 1543: 1524: 1510: 1491: 1472: 1457: 1438: 1423: 1361: 1338: 1323: 1304: 1278: 1252: 1228: 1221: 1203: 1176: 1155: 1113: 1084: 1069: 1031: 1024: 1002: 972: 965: 942: 915: 859: 851: 839: 808: 784: 777: 757: 723: 701: 697: 646: 642: 630: 581: 539: 517: 492: 478: 452: 436: 412: 354: 337: 291: 276: 263: 249: 220: 210: 158: 150: 136: 2975: 396:. The first row of a cell must have a rowspan with the total number of rows the cell covers. It's 3255: 3211: 3144: 3120: 3040: 3020: 2829:. It ends with a sock-block notice stamped 20:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC), barely half an hour after 2180: 2125: 2078: 1696: 1091: 366: 245: 167: 132: 51: 17: 1097: 1049: 743: 193: 2382:

editors. But you might just want to think about rewording your userpage statement which says: :

2986: 2942: 2662: 2466: 2430: 2414: 2375: 2360: 2260: 1408: 1395: 1377: 1348: 1014: 393: 376: 282: 3102:

https://www.mid-day.com/articles/ashi-singh-would-like-to-play-jennifer-wingets-role/19418175

3159: 3086: 3024: 2844: 2838: 2794: 2776: 2751: 2735: 2611: 2566: 2530:, welcome to the Teahouse. Actually, there is a very clear explanation on your talk page at 2243: 2056: 1659:

There does not seem to be an English spellchecker. That would be a useful tool when editing.

1554: 666:! I've submitted it for review again - is there be something else I need to do? Thank you! 610: 600: 596: 531: 404: 197: 2981: 2877: 2830: 2808: 2761: 2757: 2698: 2666: 2548: 2462: 2447: 2406: 2391: 2329: 2255: 2166: 2151: 2115: 2100: 2016: 1969: 1943: 1921: 1917: 1888: 1830: 1813: 1775: 1677: 1640: 1581: 1502: 1270: 1195: 1136: 1105: 1101: 1053: 715: 679: 667: 622: 573: 549: 509: 470: 428: 346: 297: 268: 230:

In the meantime, Nick Moyes you have opened a whole new bit of information when I see the

216: 202: 955:

different distinct Klan organizations active at various times over 160 years. Please see

771:, and ruthlessly eliminate every trace of promotional or empty language from your draft. 1753:

has a warning "Needs additional citations" at its beginning, but there are 51 footnotes.

1290:

still confuses me and I think it gives a chaotic impression. I started with <ref: -->

3247: 3232: 3199: 3189: 3172: 3066: 2726: 2272: 2251: 2147: 1993: 1958: 1948:

I have numbered images and referenced the numbers in the text before for clarity. See

1771: 1750: 1445: 1216: 1019: 960: 892: 868: 794: 772: 768: 708: 693: 663: 657: 653: 638: 614: 181: 3251: 3228: 3219: 3207: 3204:

https://www.iwmbuzz.com/television/editorial/tv-actresses-made-impact-2018/2019/01/15

3168: 3155: 3140: 3135:

anything about it here , which is why I asked . Thank you so much for hearing me out.

3116: 2409:

Yes, thank you, I've changed the wording. Do you know how I can clean up the mess on

2379: 2264: 2239: 2233: 2189: 2176: 2142:

a selfie (not some other person's photo of him) on Twitter, accompanied by the words

2136: 2121: 2090: 2074: 2066: 1692: 1191: 689: 569: 560: 483:

Yes, I did. I had not noticed you had addressed that on your userpage. No worries.

256: 241: 189: 185: 173: 144: 128: 3054:: if you only do the easy parts, then you won't have created anything of any value. 2658: 2247: 2211: 1949: 1913: 1576: 1572: 1122:

Am I allowed to use 'Dr.' on a page for others who are not the subject of the page?

951: 847: 572:? Your contributions will be all the better for some wider experience in editing. 2969:

hello, how to modify his language I put it on french but it is still in english

2870: 2834: 2062: 692:

unless there's a really strong policy-based or guideline-based for doing so. --

50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1132: 1128: 2386:. It's a bit ambiguous, but I'm guessing you really mean you wish to declare 2070: 1984: 1953: 1121: 846:

Content in Knowledge must be verifiable by a reliable source. Please review

637:

My comments were spot on I'm happy to reassess the page when you are ready.

2065:'s article, but i’m unsure whether it’s copyright free. it’s a still from 1691:

article, you must follow the convention already established on that page.

554:

It is not unreasonable for any normal editor with vast experience such as

3132:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources

3061:, and take note of what it says. You might also find the shorter list in 621:

in response to my inquiry as it seemed to a bit harsh. Thank you again.

3057:

If you want to write an article on your school, please start by reading

2238:

There are basically two types of images you'll find used on Knowledge: "

1343:

Dear Martin of Sheffield. Thank you again for fixing my link problem in

177: 1989: 223:- I hate red ink in Knowledge articles which is the start of all this. 2653:

I'm afraid your fan-made movies are simply not noteworthy enough (see

1676:

wordprocessor (like MS Word) and do a spell and grammar check there.)

3250:

for the reply. I will act on your suggestions . Thank you . Peace --

3198:

Would this be something closer to what might be significant coverage

1594:

Dear Nick, I surely agree. I thought there were automatic review bot.

866:

The article's first paragraph begins "The Vietnam War . . . was an

1037: 1571:

for more info on this. Assessment is very subjective, apart from

684:

I'm not sure why, but you moved another editor's post with your

2484:

My draft for a fan-made movie was deleted, I wanna know why.

29: 2073:

and produced by The Forge. would i be able to upload this? –

605:

Oh my. Maybe that was a poor choice of words in my reply to

194:

https://www.revolvy.com/page/List-of-world-stocks-of-beehives

1857:

Perhaps I talk too much. Just tell me to go somewhere else.

817: 2055:

hello, i want to upload the second photo from this tweet:

824:

war on their country. thanks for hearing me out J.Barnes

738:

Need advises or suggestions on the AFC got denied recently

3171:

is the place to ask about reliable sources in general. --

2057:

https://twitter.com/samretford/status/1031874784781627393

613:

I was referring to. It was the one left by the reviewer

1404:

is automatic. Personally, when given the choice, I use

1038:

I'm struggling making a page for a charity ogranisation

401: 2775:

I'm just regularly editing and it sometimes pops up

2717:

Can someone disable captcha? It's getting in the way

1329:

be either citation or cite book etc. with ref=harv.

3218:I don't know the answer to your general question, 2388:no personal or professional relationship with them 983:How would i add picture/media on wikipedia page? 1968:That works for me. Thanks for the example page. 879:Thus the article makes clear at the outset that 1237:Remaining newby problems of a not-so-new-editor 2171:you’ve seriously got attitude problems. like, 1414:and let the system sort out the fine details. 3112:time of your schedules and helping me out . 2565:which applies to all pages including drafts. 2545:this explanation of what we mean by 'Notable' 443:incorrect. Your draft is a work in progress. 8: 3224:WP:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force 2480:Why did my fan-made movie draft got deleted? 2328:Also asked, and answered, at the Help Desk. 3085:Hi , I am actually editing a draft article 317:Spring Hill, TN TN Children’s Home Memorial 3014: 2908: 2721: 2621: 2584: 2485: 2293: 1043: 984: 928: 825: 370: 323: 2269:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission 2563:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 2534:- did you not see it? It explains that 2252:Knowledge's non-free content use policy 1882:talk too much, you should read some of 2697:I think his new userpage says it all. 2541:Knowledge:Knowledge is an encyclopedia 2383: 2207: 1401: 1388: 935:2605:6001:E3C5:5E00:F552:F42:AEE1:CB5C 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 322:by TN Children’s Home on 9-29-1933. 7: 818:https://en.wikipedia.org/Vietnam_War 234:you used. If I knew I could've done 3081:References and Significant Coverage 2716: 2250:). Non-free images are subject to 2033:Jean-Antoine de Mesmes (1640-1709) 957:List of Ku Klux Klan organizations 895:includes the term "Police action." 832:2601:406:300:5B5:7426:C6CC:32A:7F4 28: 3222:- I guess that that might be why 3009:Adding image and video on my page 2354:I would like to clean up a page. 1805:— continues after insertion below 1763:— continues after insertion below 1669:— continues after insertion below 1625:— continues after insertion below 1546:— continues after insertion below 1494:— continues after insertion below 1345:Jean-Antoine de Mesmes (1640-1709 1307:— continues after insertion below 1255:— continues after insertion below 2436: 2319: 2206:Well, NM's first reply included 2061:i want to use it as a photo for 1190:evidence and submit a report to 891:the war, and the linked article 565:Here are all 1,326 of your edits 123:List of world stocks of beehives 33: 959:for more detailed information. 876:by the United States . . . ." . 3227:reliable. Again I say, ask at 2536:Draft:Rayman: The Legend Rises 1: 2841:) 16:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2097:"when in doubt, leave it out" 3214:) 18:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC 2833:' answer just above this. -- 2655:Knowledge:Notability (films) 2532:User talk:SuperMarioLoganFan 2287:New article- Romanian singer 1569:Knowledge:Content assessment 127:Thanks for your assistance, 3188:Thank you for the response 662:Sure that would be helpful 609:. It was not your comment 3275: 3260:19:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 3241:19:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 3181:18:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 3149:16:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 3125:15:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 3075:19:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 3033:17:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 3003:18:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2959:17:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2927:17:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2886:17:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2817:19:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2785:19:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2770:19:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2744:19:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2707:16:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2693:16:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2675:15:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2640:15:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2615:15:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2603:15:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2575:11:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2557:10:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2520:10:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2504:10:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2475:15:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2456:15:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2423:13:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2400:12:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2369:11:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2338:14:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2312:11:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2281:13:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2217:12:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2202:20:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2185:19:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2160:19:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2130:19:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2109:19:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2083:18:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2045:20:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2027:19:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 2002:05:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1978:01:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1964:01:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1930:00:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1897:23:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1869:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1841:19:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 1822:00:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1803:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1784:00:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1761:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1732:17:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC) 1718:16:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC) 1701:15:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1686:00:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1667:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1649:00:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1623:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1604:21:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC) 1590:23:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1563:23:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1544:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1525:20:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 1511:23:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1492:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1473:21:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC) 1458:20:31, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 1439:20:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC) 1424:23:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1362:08:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1339:20:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 1324:23:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1305:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1279:23:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1253:22:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC) 1229:08:10, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1204:07:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1177:07:08, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1156:07:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1141:19:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 1114:07:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1085:07:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1062:06:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1032:06:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1003:05:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 973:05:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 943:04:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 916:04:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 860:00:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 840:23:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 809:03:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 785:04:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 758:03:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 724:02:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 702:01:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 674:) 10:13 am, Today (UTC+9) 647:00:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 631:00:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 582:00:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 540:23:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 518:22:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 493:21:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 479:21:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 453:20:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 437:20:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 413:23:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 355:23:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 338:22:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 296:A very good point indeed. 292:22:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 277:22:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 250:22:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 211:21:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 159:21:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 137:21:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 1009:Welcome to the Teahouse, 763:Welcome to the Teahouse, 3043:. I guess this is about 2863:21:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC) 225:Colony collapse disorder 1391:. If the article uses 1162:Regarding blocked users 419:Comments on an article. 3063:User:ian.thomson/Howto 2821:See this user's query 1770:with a reference. The 2208:No, absolutely not!!! 769:neutral point of view 121:The deleted article: 46:of past discussions. 2411:Soundwalk Collective 2356:Soundwalk Collective 2347:Soundwalk Collective 979:Adding picture/media 110:View deleted article 3045:User:Roosmi/sandbox 1450:Martin of Sheffield 1416:Martin of Sheffield 1316:Martin of Sheffield 1241:Dear teahouse host 1102:notability criteria 1075:follow the horse.-- 1070:Draft:Bread Charity 264:Special:Preferences 3059:your first article 2649:SuperMarioLoganFan 2628:SuperMarioLoganFan 2591:SuperMarioLoganFan 2528:SuperMarioLoganFan 2492:SuperMarioLoganFan 904:right great wrongs 793:Thank you so much 367:Millie Bobby Brown 365:I've been editing 215:Tea hee thank you 18:Knowledge:Teahouse 3035: 3019:comment added by 3000: 2956: 2936:Celebwriter534555 2929: 2915:Celebwriter534555 2913:comment added by 2899: 2898: 2865: 2642: 2626:comment added by 2605: 2589:comment added by 2506: 2490:comment added by 2314: 2298:comment added by 1962: 1807: 1765: 1744:Warning Templates 1671: 1627: 1610:Contents Template 1548: 1531:Article Promotion 1496: 1349:Knowledge:Surname 1309: 1257: 1095: 1064: 1048:comment added by 1015:Wikimedia Commons 1005: 989:comment added by 945: 933:comment added by 842: 830:comment added by 398:text-align:center 388: 375:comment added by 340: 328:comment added by 184:-ed, rather than 171: 107: 106: 58: 57: 52:current main page 3266: 3087:Draft:Ashi_Singh 2998: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2979: 2954: 2951: 2948: 2945: 2939: 2874: 2859: 2853: 2847: 2842: 2798: 2755: 2722: 2652: 2444: 2440: 2439: 2434: 2327: 2323: 2322: 2261:explicit consent 2237: 2214: 2194:John from Idegon 2170: 2140: 2119: 2094: 2024: 2019: 1956: 1947: 1940: 1907: 1838: 1833: 1806: 1796: 1764: 1754: 1710:John from Idegon 1670: 1660: 1637: 1626: 1616: 1547: 1537: 1495: 1485: 1413: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1376: 1372: 1308: 1298: 1267: 1256: 1246: 1226: 1224:Let's discuss it 1188: 1089: 1029: 1027:Let's discuss it 1011:William MMXCVIII 991:William MMXCVIII 970: 968:Let's discuss it 782: 780:Let's discuss it 712: 683: 661: 619:John from Idegon 607:John from Idegon 604: 556:John from Idegon 553: 506:John from Idegon 503: 500:John from Idegon 485:John from Idegon 466:John from Idegon 463: 460:John from Idegon 445:John from Idegon 399: 260: 165: 148: 114:Hello teahouse– 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 3274: 3273: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3093: 3083: 3011: 2993: 2990: 2987: 2973: 2967: 2949: 2946: 2943: 2933: 2905: 2900: 2868: 2857: 2851: 2845: 2792: 2758:Special:Captcha 2749: 2729: 2719: 2646: 2482: 2437: 2435: 2428: 2351:Dear Teahouse, 2349: 2320: 2318: 2289: 2244:freely licensed 2231: 2212: 2164: 2134: 2113: 2088: 2053: 2037:Johannes Schade 2022: 2017: 2013:Johannes Schade 1941: 1937:Johannes Schade 1934: 1904:Johannes Schade 1901: 1876:Johannes Schade 1861:Johannes Schade 1851: 1836: 1831: 1827:Johannes Schade 1800:Johannes Schade 1797: 1792: 1758:Johannes Schade 1755: 1746: 1724:Johannes Schade 1706:Johannes Schade 1664:Johannes Schade 1661: 1657: 1634:Johannes Schade 1631: 1620:Johannes Schade 1617: 1612: 1596:Johannes Schade 1541:Johannes Schade 1538: 1533: 1517:Johannes Schade 1489:Johannes Schade 1486: 1481: 1465:Johannes Schade 1431:Johannes Schade 1411: 1405: 1398: 1392: 1384: 1380: 1374: 1370: 1354:Johannes Schade 1331:Johannes Schade 1302:Johannes Schade 1299: 1287: 1264:Johannes Schade 1261: 1250:Johannes Schade 1247: 1239: 1222: 1182: 1164: 1124: 1068:Courtesy link: 1040: 1025: 981: 966: 924: 850:for more info. 821: 778: 740: 706: 677: 651: 594: 547: 497: 457: 421: 397: 363: 319: 254: 232:(edit conflict) 142: 112: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3272: 3270: 3244: 3243: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3164: 3163: 3137: 3136: 3104: 3099: 3091: 3082: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3055: 3048: 3010: 3007: 3006: 3005: 2966: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2904: 2901: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2773: 2772: 2731: 2730: 2725: 2720: 2718: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2618: 2617: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2523: 2522: 2481: 2478: 2459: 2458: 2403: 2402: 2348: 2345: 2343: 2341: 2340: 2288: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2242:" and "free" ( 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2069:, which is on 2052: 2051:upload a photo 2049: 2048: 2047: 2029: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1932: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1791: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1772:Siege of Derry 1751:Siege of Derry 1745: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1592: 1565: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1513: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1460: 1446:MOS:PUNCTSPACE 1441: 1426: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1326: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1087: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1034: 980: 977: 976: 975: 923: 920: 919: 918: 908:90.200.138.194 896: 893:Undeclared war 877: 869:undeclared war 863: 862: 820: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 788: 787: 739: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 635: 634: 633: 615:User:Legacypac 587: 586: 585: 584: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 420: 417: 416: 415: 362: 359: 358: 357: 330:75.187.137.218 318: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 239: 228: 162: 161: 111: 108: 105: 104: 99: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3271: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3191: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3133: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3113: 3109: 3108: 3103: 3098: 3090: 3088: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3053: 3049: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3008: 3004: 3001: 2996: 2983: 2977: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2964: 2960: 2957: 2952: 2937: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2902: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2872: 2867: 2866: 2864: 2860: 2858:contributions 2854: 2848: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2805:WP:REGISTERED 2802: 2801:autoconfirmed 2796: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2753: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2723: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2616: 2613: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2524: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2479: 2477: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2443: 2432: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2357: 2352: 2346: 2344: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2326: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2248:public domain 2245: 2241: 2235: 2230: 2218: 2215: 2209: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2168: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2138: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2117: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2092: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2067:Ackley Bridge 2064: 2059: 2058: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2028: 2025: 2020: 2014: 2011: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1986: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1951: 1945: 1938: 1933: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1905: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1885: 1881: 1878:if you think 1877: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1848: 1842: 1839: 1834: 1828: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1801: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1752: 1743: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1668: 1665: 1655:Spell Checker 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1635: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1542: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1493: 1490: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1442: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1427: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1410: 1397: 1379: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1327: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1303: 1294: 1291:</ref: --> 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1265: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1251: 1242: 1236: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1220: 1219: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1093: 1092:edit conflict 1088: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1023: 1022: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 978: 974: 971: 969: 964: 963: 958: 953: 948: 947: 946: 944: 940: 936: 932: 922:KLU KLUX KLAN 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 900:most commonly 897: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 875: 871: 870: 865: 864: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 844: 843: 841: 837: 833: 829: 819: 816: 810: 806: 802: 798: 797: 792: 791: 790: 789: 786: 783: 781: 776: 775: 770: 766: 762: 761: 760: 759: 755: 751: 747: 745: 737: 725: 721: 717: 710: 705: 704: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 681: 676: 675: 673: 669: 665: 659: 655: 650: 649: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 602: 598: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 583: 579: 575: 571: 566: 562: 557: 551: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 537: 533: 519: 515: 511: 507: 501: 496: 495: 494: 490: 486: 482: 481: 480: 476: 472: 467: 461: 456: 455: 454: 450: 446: 441: 440: 439: 438: 434: 430: 424: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 395: 391: 390: 389: 386: 382: 378: 374: 368: 360: 356: 352: 348: 343: 342: 341: 339: 335: 331: 327: 316: 303: 299: 295: 294: 293: 290: 288: 286: 285: 280: 279: 278: 274: 270: 265: 258: 253: 252: 251: 247: 243: 240: 237: 233: 229: 226: 222: 218: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 178:Deletionpedia 175: 169: 168:edit conflict 164: 163: 160: 156: 152: 146: 141: 140: 139: 138: 134: 130: 125: 124: 119: 115: 109: 103: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3245: 3197: 3165: 3138: 3114: 3110: 3094: 3084: 3051: 3015:— Preceding 3012: 2968: 2909:— Preceding 2906: 2822: 2774: 2734: 2680: 2622:— Preceding 2619: 2585:— Preceding 2581: 2486:— Preceding 2483: 2467:Sonnenalle44 2460: 2441: 2431:Sonnenalle44 2415:Sonnenalle44 2404: 2387: 2376:Sonnenalle44 2361:Sonnenalle44 2353: 2350: 2342: 2324: 2294:— Preceding 2290: 2172: 2143: 2096: 2060: 2054: 1950:Hexacyclinol 1909: 1883: 1879: 1859: 1856: 1852: 1793: 1747: 1658: 1613: 1534: 1482: 1295: 1288: 1243: 1240: 1223: 1217: 1212: 1165: 1125: 1044:— Preceding 1041: 1026: 1020: 985:— Preceding 982: 967: 961: 952:Ku Klux Klan 929:— Preceding 925: 899: 888: 887:anyone else 884: 880: 873: 867: 826:— Preceding 822: 795: 779: 773: 748: 741: 528: 425: 422: 394:Thebekahbird 377:Thebekahbird 371:— Preceding 364: 324:— Preceding 320: 284:TimTempleton 283: 235: 231: 126: 120: 116: 113: 82: 47: 41: 2999:(Channel 2) 2955:(Channel 2) 2846:Vchimpanzee 2843:Archived.— 2795:Dreamlover8 2777:Dreamlover8 2752:Dreamlover8 2736:Dreamlover8 2681:improvement 2567:PrimeHunter 2063:Sam Retford 2018:S Philbrick 1920:. Regards, 1832:S Philbrick 1555:David notMD 1387:, just add 611:David notMD 601:David notMD 597:David notMD 532:David notMD 405:PrimeHunter 400:. Fixed in 102:Archive 930 94:Archive 928 89:Archive 927 83:Archive 926 77:Archive 925 72:Archive 924 64:Archive 920 40:This is an 3246:Thank you 3160:notability 3065:useful. -- 2878:Nick Moyes 2831:Nick Moyes 2809:Nick Moyes 2762:Nick Moyes 2699:Nick Moyes 2685:Quisqualis 2667:Nick Moyes 2663:WP:TOOSOON 2549:Nick Moyes 2463:Nick Moyes 2448:Nick Moyes 2407:Nick Moyes 2392:Nick Moyes 2330:Nick Moyes 2300:VladMihai1 2167:Nick Moyes 2152:Nick Moyes 2116:Nick Moyes 2101:Nick Moyes 1970:Nick Moyes 1944:Nick Moyes 1922:Nick Moyes 1889:Nick Moyes 1854:use them. 1814:Nick Moyes 1776:Nick Moyes 1678:Nick Moyes 1641:Nick Moyes 1582:Nick Moyes 1503:Nick Moyes 1271:Nick Moyes 1209:Quisqualis 1196:Nick Moyes 1185:Quisqualis 1169:Quisqualis 1167:blocked?-- 1148:Quisqualis 1129:MOS:DOCTOR 1106:Nick Moyes 1077:Quisqualis 765:Henhuawang 716:LorriBrown 680:LorriBrown 668:LorriBrown 623:LorriBrown 574:Nick Moyes 550:LorriBrown 510:LorriBrown 471:LorriBrown 429:LorriBrown 361:rowspans?? 347:Nick Moyes 298:Nick Moyes 269:Nick Moyes 217:Nick Moyes 203:Nick Moyes 3248:ColinFine 3233:ColinFine 3200:ColinFine 3190:ColinFine 3173:ColinFine 3067:ColinFine 3052:difficult 2413:'s page? 2273:Marchjuly 2173:seriously 2099:Regards, 2071:Channel 4 1994:Marchjuly 1985:MOS:ACCIM 1959:reactions 1402:|ref=harv 1389:|ref=harv 874:supported 709:Marchjuly 694:Marchjuly 686:last edit 664:Legacypac 658:Legacypac 654:Legacypac 639:Legacypac 198:WP:REFUND 22:Questions 3252:Peter025 3220:Peter025 3208:Peter025 3156:Peter025 3141:Peter025 3117:Peter025 3029:contribs 3017:unsigned 2965:language 2923:contribs 2911:unsigned 2659:reliable 2636:contribs 2624:unsigned 2612:~ GB fan 2599:contribs 2587:unsigned 2512:Mstrojny 2500:contribs 2488:unsigned 2308:contribs 2296:unsigned 2256:WP:FREER 2240:non-free 2234:DarkGlow 2190:DarkGlow 2177:DarkGlow 2137:DarkGlow 2122:DarkGlow 2091:DarkGlow 2075:DarkGlow 1910:specific 1874:Crikey, 1693:Emeraude 1479:Projects 1409:citation 1396:citation 1385:cite XYZ 1378:citation 1371:cite XYZ 1285:Citation 1058:contribs 1046:unsigned 999:contribs 987:unsigned 931:unsigned 889:declared 852:Mstrojny 828:unsigned 385:contribs 373:unsigned 326:unsigned 257:GeeBee60 242:GeeBee60 221:Mstrojny 174:GeeBee60 151:Mstrojny 145:GeeBee60 129:GeeBee60 20:‎ | 3154:Hello, 3039:Hello, 2982:purging 2976:Feyanox 2903:Article 2727:WP:DENY 2526:Hello, 2213:Tigraan 2148:WP:OTRS 1990:MOS:MOS 1245:places. 883:the US 881:neither 423:Hello, 182:WP:PROD 172:Hello, 43:archive 3229:WP:RSN 3041:Roosmi 3021:Roosmi 2994:insane 2950:insane 2871:Thnidu 2835:Thnidu 2380:WP:COI 2265:WP:MCQ 2023:(Talk) 1849:Images 1837:(Talk) 1790:Quotes 1218:Cullen 1192:WP:SPI 1096:Hello 1021:Cullen 962:Cullen 796:Cullen 774:Cullen 690:WP:TPO 570:WP:TWA 561:WP:COI 190:WP:CSD 186:WP:AFD 2988:-A la 2944:-A la 2827:#help 2823:above 1992:. -- 1914:WP:VP 1577:WP:FA 1573:WP:GA 1297:work. 1133:Kgywu 1098:M8ms2 1050:M8ms2 848:WP:RS 504:Hello 464:Hello 16:< 3256:talk 3237:talk 3231:. -- 3212:talk 3177:talk 3145:talk 3121:talk 3071:talk 3025:talk 2919:talk 2882:talk 2852:talk 2839:talk 2813:talk 2781:talk 2766:talk 2740:talk 2703:talk 2689:talk 2671:talk 2632:talk 2595:talk 2571:talk 2553:talk 2516:talk 2496:talk 2471:talk 2461:Hey 2452:talk 2442:Done 2419:talk 2396:talk 2365:talk 2334:talk 2325:Done 2304:talk 2277:talk 2198:talk 2181:talk 2175:. – 2156:talk 2146:Our 2126:talk 2105:talk 2079:talk 2041:talk 1998:talk 1974:talk 1954:shoy 1926:talk 1918:here 1893:talk 1865:talk 1818:talk 1780:talk 1728:talk 1714:talk 1697:talk 1682:talk 1645:talk 1600:talk 1586:talk 1575:and 1567:See 1559:talk 1521:talk 1507:talk 1469:talk 1454:talk 1435:talk 1420:talk 1373:and 1358:talk 1335:talk 1320:talk 1275:talk 1213:must 1200:talk 1173:talk 1152:talk 1137:talk 1110:talk 1081:talk 1054:talk 995:talk 939:talk 912:talk 856:talk 836:talk 805:talk 754:talk 744:Hubb 720:talk 698:talk 672:talk 656:and 643:talk 627:talk 599:and 578:talk 536:talk 514:talk 489:talk 475:talk 449:talk 433:talk 409:talk 381:talk 351:talk 334:talk 302:talk 273:talk 246:talk 236:that 219:and 207:talk 155:talk 133:talk 3169:RSN 3105:3. 3100:2. 3095:1. 2861:• 2405:Hi 2374:Hi 2246:or 1880:you 885:nor 801:HHW 750:HHW 469:it? 392:Hi 188:or 3258:) 3239:) 3206:-- 3202:? 3179:) 3147:) 3139:-- 3123:) 3115:-- 3089:. 3073:) 3031:) 3027:• 2991:d 2947:d 2925:) 2921:• 2884:) 2855:• 2849:• 2825:, 2815:) 2783:) 2768:) 2742:) 2705:) 2691:) 2673:) 2638:) 2634:• 2601:) 2597:• 2573:) 2555:) 2518:) 2502:) 2498:• 2473:) 2454:) 2421:) 2398:) 2390:? 2367:) 2336:) 2310:) 2306:• 2279:) 2200:) 2183:) 2158:) 2128:) 2107:) 2081:) 2043:) 2000:) 1976:) 1952:. 1928:) 1895:) 1884:my 1867:) 1820:) 1798:— 1782:) 1756:— 1730:) 1716:) 1699:) 1684:) 1662:— 1647:) 1618:— 1602:) 1588:) 1561:) 1539:— 1523:) 1509:) 1487:— 1471:) 1456:) 1437:) 1422:) 1412:}} 1406:{{ 1399:}} 1393:{{ 1381:}} 1375:{{ 1360:) 1337:) 1322:) 1300:— 1277:) 1248:— 1202:) 1175:) 1154:) 1139:) 1112:) 1083:) 1060:) 1056:• 1001:) 997:• 941:) 914:) 858:) 838:) 807:) 756:) 722:) 700:) 645:) 629:) 580:) 538:) 516:) 491:) 477:) 451:) 435:) 411:) 403:. 387:) 383:• 353:) 336:) 275:) 248:) 209:) 157:) 135:) 98:→ 68:← 3254:( 3235:( 3210:( 3175:( 3143:( 3119:( 3069:( 3023:( 2978:: 2974:@ 2938:: 2934:@ 2917:( 2880:( 2873:: 2869:@ 2837:( 2811:( 2797:: 2793:@ 2779:( 2764:( 2754:: 2750:@ 2738:( 2701:( 2687:( 2669:( 2651:: 2647:@ 2630:( 2593:( 2569:( 2551:( 2514:( 2494:( 2469:( 2450:( 2433:: 2429:@ 2417:( 2394:( 2363:( 2332:( 2302:( 2275:( 2236:: 2232:@ 2196:( 2179:( 2169:: 2165:@ 2154:( 2139:: 2135:@ 2124:( 2118:: 2114:@ 2103:( 2093:: 2089:@ 2077:( 2039:( 1996:( 1972:( 1961:) 1957:( 1946:: 1942:@ 1939:: 1935:@ 1924:( 1906:: 1902:@ 1891:( 1863:( 1816:( 1778:( 1726:( 1712:( 1695:( 1680:( 1643:( 1636:: 1632:@ 1598:( 1584:( 1557:( 1519:( 1505:( 1467:( 1452:( 1444:( 1433:( 1418:( 1356:( 1333:( 1318:( 1273:( 1266:: 1262:@ 1198:( 1187:: 1183:@ 1171:( 1150:( 1135:( 1108:( 1094:) 1090:( 1079:( 1052:( 993:( 937:( 910:( 854:( 834:( 803:( 752:( 718:( 711:: 707:@ 696:( 682:: 678:@ 670:( 660:: 652:@ 641:( 625:( 603:: 595:@ 576:( 552:: 548:@ 534:( 512:( 502:: 498:@ 487:( 473:( 462:: 458:@ 447:( 431:( 407:( 379:( 349:( 332:( 304:) 300:( 271:( 259:: 255:@ 244:( 205:( 170:) 166:( 153:( 147:: 143:@ 131:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 926 - Knowledge

Index