Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 107

1708:. Encyclopedias like Knowledge are tertiary sources. That means we only write about what others are writing about in reliable, fact-checked secondary sources. The sources you have on the article right now are either non reliable (one of the ones in Arabic appears to be a blog. Blogs are not reliable sources due to no fact checking), or they are primary. (eg, the UN paper that he authored) If you can find newspaper articles or books that cover him in a substantial way, that is what you need to show notability. Altho I am a reviewer, I did not review your article as I would have had to deny it. Please work on it, and let us know here so we can critique it for you before it gets reviewed. Happy editing! 548:, which is not going to be your best option since not everyone will have the script loaded (actually, you would likely be the only one). You could do it with an image that has a diagonal line going from one corner to the other and a transparent background and stretch it across the entire cell. This would work fine if nothing else was in the cell. Using it as a background via css "may" not work (I've had difficulties getting background images to work on MW myself). Assuming that you are just wishing to differentiate a cell and colors alone aren't enough, you could also possibly use some old school tricks to "shade" the cell in with ░▒▓█ or any of the other characters available 766:

shown to be a free image - by free it is either out of copyright or has been released into the public domain, being widely available on the internet does not meet this second criteria; it is a specific action by the copyright holder to licence the images they own for general use. Knowledge does allow no free use if a stringent set of criteria can be met, one of those is that free images do not exist or could not be created and if you were to upload a non free image that is very likely the criteria that you would fail under. There are a number of free images of Rory that have already been uploaded to Knowledge's sister site, Wikimedia Commons and you can fnd them at

3025:. That is, before something is to be the subject of an article at Knowledge, it first needs to be the subject of extensive writing somewhere else, and that writing can't just be written by people connected to the subject. That is, creating a webpage about yourself wouldn't qualify you for being the subject of a Knowledge article. If, however, a well-known biographer wrote a long, extensive book about your entire life and it was published by a well-respected publishing house, it's likely that you COULD be the subject of a Knowledge article. Now, back to the 2720:

the news due to a recent controversy was notable enough to be on Knowledge before the controversy, since there is only one source pre-2013 that covers them in significant detail. Some people are saying the content of the older source (about fare wars) makes the company notable, since they say that a fare war was a big deal in the 1980s, but how do we know that this claim is true without additional sources confirming that this is indeed true? How is notability determined on a case-by-case basis?

1450:(several of whom just flew by my head...need a fly swatter) and was wondering if anyone could point me to the notability guidelines for nonhuman genes (if there is one). This gene in particular has been written about in dozens of papers and scientists generally think it's quite important for insect development - so the article could be really well fleshed out. I'm just not sure where we draw the line for nonhuman genes and don't particularly want to deal with an AfD this week. Thanks much! :) 3748:, which states "Unless specified in the "Exceptions" section below, an acronym should be written out in full the first time it is used on a page, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses, e.g. Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)." I hope that helps! If you have further questions about how to format or organize your article, the Manual of Style (MOS) is fairly comprehensive, though it can be daunting to get through it all, so if you need help finding something, you can always ask! -- 662:

people who did the research. It is the later evaluation of that research by other experts with no vested interest in the outcome which provides the best referencing for this type of article. Overreliance on primary research would make it easier for editors pushing a certain point of view to cherry-pick sources to buttress their argument. We are supposed to summarize what a wide range of reliable sources say, and secondary sources also strive to do just that. I hope that this helps.

2528: 2412: 2540: 2424: 324:, things like lists and tables should be used sparingly, so I'd suggest dropping things like the list of past headmasters and the IEB table, and definitely the lyrics of the school song (apart from anything else, including them may be a copyright infringement). Sorry to dampen your ardour, but this sort of stuff doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Nevertheless, the effort involved is commendable, and I look forward to seeing you continuing to edit Knowledge. 1297:, thanks for clarifying the policies, further. I'm learning that writing organization pages is a very touchy subject so I'm glad I learned about this before I accidentally violated the WP:Non-Free content policies. For clarification, you stated that using a logo in a sandbox article "doesn't count". Could you please elaborate, as this implies that you can, both, put the logo in the sandbox and the final production article. Thanks. Frank -- 35: 2566: 2450: 2590: 2474: 2552: 2436: 2578: 2462: 2186:. The current article would not be long enough if it was new (it has 1,133 characters of prose currently), and it had, preexisting, 863 characters of prose. Thus, it would require 4,315 characters of prose to meet a fivefold expansion. Accordingly, you would need to expand it to at least this length on or before 18:08, May 28, 2013‎ for it to qualify. Best regards-- 384:

page of edits uses the name of an editor who first told me about TW the following day. I took a brief glance at that page and decided there was too much info to learn right now, so I would look at it later. So, I have never used TW. SO, is there a way to have a private interview with an admin or somebody who could track down what is going on? Thank you!

1588: 3380:

editors may read your comments but decide that a response isn't necessary - we are here to build an encyclopedia rather than chat about it, so if the issue you're discussing is resolved, uncontroversial or just plain trivial, there may be no need to discuss it. If you want to get a response from a specific editor, you can leave them a

353:

probably be a reliable source, and sourced to a book (published by the school's alumni association, or something of that sort) whose independence or reliability might be questioned. That's not a disastrous balance, and compares very favourably with a lot of school articles out there. On the other hand, it can probably never get to

2761:"Some people are saying the content of the older source (about fare wars) makes the company notable, since they say that a fare war was a big deal in the 1980s, but how do we know that this claim is true without additional sources confirming that this is indeed true? How is notability determined on a case-by-case basis?" 3214:

Yeah, I was paraphrasing with synonyms. Extensive, significant, non-trivial, in-depth, more-than-superficial, detailed, etc. all cover the idea. Whichever of those close synonyms works for you, go with it. The idea is that, if something is to be the subject of its own Knowledge article, then that

2344:

Hello! I have a question regarding an article I have been trying to get approved for the last month or so, although I have definitely made progress in better representing the organization's notability, I still need assistance in deciding which of my sources are necessary, and which are not helping my

1643:

that attempts to lay down the best way of achieving consistency in articles. Basically if the subject has a leaning towards a particular English speaking country then use that variant of English otherwise use the variant of English used in the first non-stub version of the article. Where titles are

1234:

Guideline. If that is the plan, to use a logo that way, one complication is that such a logo much be used in exactly one article, and a sandbox article "doesn't count". Any other image can be added at any times, as well as a logo is it is uploaded with a free license, but if the plan is to use a logo

1200:

I've been working with the guidance of a couple of WP admins to build a solid company page. As per WP policies, I'm using a subpage off of my User Page as a sandbox for article development, with the intent to publish the article to production, later, through a formal "move" command, when the article

1120:

unless others have discussed the discovery. So, if I am interpreting your words correctly, the first step would be to get reliable sources, such as scientific or engineering journals, to discuss the topic. If such independent coverage already exists, please propose changes on the article's talk page.

3438:

and welcome to the Teahouse! When you ask questions on talk pages, you are at the mercy of the number of people that are watching that talk page (the article's page more specifically) and how active they are. Sometimes, no-one is watching a page, and you feel like you are getting ignored. That is

3379:

Hi Balgontalk, welcome to the Teahouse. The answer is... it depends. Some article talkpages are watched religiously by hundreds of editors, others are barely watchlisted by anyone - if you comment on one of those less-frequented pages, chances are no-one will notice for a while. In some cases, other

2719:

No, they are not arguing about "What is the minimum standard for Notability so that a source can be cited in an article on Knowledge?". Any source with editorial oversight can be added once a subject is determined to be notable, I believe. They are arguing over whether this company which has been in

2690:

Newsworthy and Noteworthy. However, this being the case, I think WP admins and article contributors are really arguing about "What is the minimum standard for Notability so that a source can be cited in an article on Knowledge?" I would love to see this get resolved with a clear and documented set

2376:

mean you need an inline citation for every statement - a general citation, perhaps located in the "External links" section or listed generically under "References" can be used if there's a single source (a book, a very informative webpage, etc.) that covers a lot of the information in the article. –

1167:

Welcome to the Teahouse, Rapidito. As a result of your recent edits, it appears that your account is autoconfirmed. That means you can now edit semi-protected articles yourself. You don't have to discuss your edits on the talk page unless someone reverts you. If there is disagreement, please discuss

860:

I recently rewrote a redirect page to be its own article. There is currently another redirect in existence that is essentially for the same thing (they were both for a television episode, but one has the name of the show in parentheses while the other just has the title of the episode). I think they

315:

Hi Matt. Wow - that's a pretty thorough article... I'd agree that certain elements of it would fall under the heading of schoolcruft, but it's still an impressive body of work. In order to prune it down to a more appropriate level, I'd recommend using a simple rule of thumb: if the infomation in the

299:

while browsing another schools talk page and think I may be guilty. I have tried to reference as much as I can and to fix many of the left over from past editors. However I still think I've gone to far with certain details. I really do want this to be a valid entry, so if somebody could please read

383:

Is there a way I could visit with an administrator to find out who or how somebody could get into a webpage and change it using my account name? I just learned about it this morning and I was able to find it a few days ago in my contributions list. It mentions using TW. The interesting thing is the

3226:

So, an article needs enough details to be useful, detailed, and engaging, and if Knowledge articles are going to be useful, detailed, and engaging, and if everything written in Knowledge articles needs to be verifiable by citing it to outside sources, then there needs to exist outside of Knowledge

1330:

To be a little more technical... A fair use image can be used once per page for every validated fair use rationale template applied to the image's page as listed in the template. If this is confusing, don't feel bad as it confuses many. I'll point you to the policies and a couple examples of fair

1229:

Hi, Frank, welcome to the Teahouse and thanks for asking such a great question. You are right in observing that there is no sandbox counterpart for images. In most cases, this is not an issue. If you add an image to an article in a sandbox, it will still be there when the article is moved. Nothing

1151:

I requested to make an edit on Mark Hunt page, Artic Kangaroo responded asked another question about my edit, so I responded, I am not sure if my request was approved, however the Edit option is now visible for me, does that means Artic Kangaroo gave a green light on that edit, I don't want to do

765:

Mdebellis, welcome to the Teahouse. Knowledge's image use policy always prefers free images over non-free images, that way they can be reused without fear of copyright breach. That a particular image appears on a zillion and one other websites doesn't give it any status for use here unless it is

2664:

talk page, and one of the points of contention is whether a single half-page suburban Chicago newspaper article is evidence of notability. It is significant coverage, but in only one source. I have a COI so I might not be seeing things clearly, but is this enough evidence of notability? Sorry the

2375:

to have a source for every controversial (or likely controversial) statement in the article, especially if it relates to a living person, active organization, etc. However, it is a good general practice to provide a source for every non-obvious statement in the article. This doesn't necessarily

1099:

I have a useful idea that I would like to put in the public domain. It is a variation of distillation that I call "pass-through distillation". The main Knowledge article on distillation has a section "Other types of distillation", and I would love to add pass-through distillation to that section,

661:

Hello Serotonick, and welcome to the Teahouse. Especially for articles about science and medicine, secondary sources are preferred, such as review articles which evaluate and summarize large numbers of primary research articles. Primary research is not truly independent since it is written by the

2352:

I have significantly edited down the section on the house/museum of the article, (by more than 1,000 words), and have provided multiple sources that prove the notability of the org such as a JSTOR article, several books, a SAGE publication, and APSA references. I would appreciate any help and or

3033:

than the people who created it. Since that is the case, there's really nothing to create a Knowledge article from: we have no independent, reliable source texts that we can cite for the information in the article, just a rehash of the very much NOT independent text that's been published by the

2765:

Since there seems to be no documentation that clearly states something like "It must be a minimum of 3 notable sources", I believe one is enough, so long as that single source meets the criteria of being a solid reference. Anything else seems to be someone just making things up, based on their

2278:

in order to understand how to properly use the answer badge. It clearly states how to add it to your page (if it's awarded to you) and states how to earn one. However, the article does not mention how to award one. I'd like to award an answer badge for a clear answer I received to an earlier

2858:

The material does have to be written about in a secondary source. A source that contains the data or information that proves what is being written about (like court records, Yelp reviews) is a primary source and is open to interpretation, so it is not acceptable in general unless what is being

931:

who manage The Script. I run the bands digital media. The band keep getting asked questions during interviews based on wrong info found on this page. How do we fix this urgently or remove the page? Is there an admin, manager or wiki community member who can contact me directly. I'd be happy to

352:

that's not independently sourced, but you should be more sparing with such information than you have been, perhaps. I randomly picked out half a dozen referenced facts from the article, and they were split about evenly between being sourced to the school's website, sourced to a book that would

3839:

them but to do that your account has to be a few days older. After this weekend your account will be old enough and you will have the ability to move articles. If you have an urgent request you can post it here, including why you think the move needs to be carried out, and someone here will

1530:

Hello everyone, I have a question regarding codes for editing articles. I was trying to edit an English article, and it's title is written in different ways in American and British English. Browsing Knowledge, I found this article in the PT Wiki that has a code to make the grammar distinction

2850:

OK, I will then accept notability based on the fact that there is an article with significant coverage, not because fare wars were important in 1980s - this is not evident and this claim is not sourced. However, then I think anything which receives a half-page coverage in a newspaper becomes

2729:

This is only an academic question at the moment because ~2 dozen sources about recent events have established notability, so this is more a question of due weight. However, the issue of whether it was notable earlier came up, so I was wondering what uninvolved third-parties think about this.

983:'s talk page (which I've just posted a note that someone is looking for anyone perhaps interested in starting a specific "The Script" WikiProject). If for some reason you do not get any response and can't find any help, you "could" always fix up the page yourself; however, please read our 3918:

for Misspellings". I reviewed the policy on misspellings, which says "Common misspellings should be listed only if there is a genuine risk of confusion or misspelling". I feel that few or no English speakers would spell "Grove" with two "oh", or "Groove" with one "oh", so his linking is

1064:

is that you had put the message at the top of the page, whereas the general rule on Knowledge talk pages is that new items go at the bottom of the page, so that's where readers will look for new questions to answer. (But don't worry, as another editor has moved it towards the bottom.)

1115:

Hello IP 99, and welcome to the Teahouse. The way you describe the idea makes it sound like something that you have discovered or invented. Knowledge summarizes topics that have received coverage in reliable, independent sources. In other words, we don't allow people to share their own

717:

Textbooks (college-level, not high school) can be good sources for science articles. The content is not bleeding-edge new untested theory as it has been filtered through curriculum setting processes that tends to be quite conservative and limits the content to well established theory.

3189:

says:"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." That basically covers it.

1616:, thank you so much for your answer! That is exactly what I am looking for, but I wanted to find the same code to differentiate American English and British English, but I only found Brazilian Portuguese and European Portuguese :( This link already helped me a lot though! Cheers, 749:

Is there a fair use justification for pictures that everyone has seen and that are on a million fan web sites? Or if not is there a database that is searchable of pre-approved images for rock stars? I suspect the answer to all these questions is no but thought its worth asking.

1201:

is deemed ready. In the article, I'm using an infobox that I'd like to add a company logo/image to. It appears that images don't have "state" and, therefore, there appears to be no such thing as a sandbox image that can later be "moved" to production, along with the article.

3314:

I've removed two of them, but have left the COI template, for obvious reasons. If no further edits are made that fall afoul of copyright or promotional guidelines, eventually that will be removed, too. But I'd caution user MovieDYSP about making non-neutral edits as a

2181:

within the past five days) has to have at least 1,500 characters of prose, and a preexisting article has to have not only that amount of prose, but have been expanded at least fivefold from its former content in the past five days – you can check the length using

2058:. If you don't like this, this doesn't address the issue you were having, or this does but you have any problem taking the example and working from it when adding more just give a holler. P.S. I gave you an example of how you can play with the colors; see 835:

Hi, your article has been deleted (twice) as being an advert about a non-notable company and also for being a copyright violation. If you think the company merits an article and you can support it with reliable sources then I suggest you start a draft at

744:

I've been working on the Rory Gallagher page and discography. I don't like the pictures of Rory on those two pages, they are when he was older and showing some of the signs of his illness I would prefer a picture of the younger Rory, something like this:

641:

I'm a little confused about the sources that are preferred for citations in Knowledge articles. I'm a student of the sciences. I read primary literature from scientific journals on a daily basis. The help articles make it seem as if primary sources are

1680:

I am writing a bio on someone who is a key contributor to the internet industry in the Gulf and the middle east. could you look at the draft and let me know if it looks ok as it will be reviewed by Knowledge team soon and I hope it would be accepted

2003:

The main point that can be hard to interpret from all the technical language is that you cannot add it as decoration. It has to be a circumstance where adding the image from the video is actually necessary to understand some important aspect of the

682:

Thank you Cullen for your answer. I've haven't been able to come up with a way to explain why someone shouldn't put their friend's latest research paper into a Wikipeida article. This is such a clear answer that I hope you don't mind if I quote it.

2680:

Hi AlmostGrad, I'm very happy that you brought this to our attention. The issue of Newsworthy vs. Noteworthy is an issue that, in my opinion, is at the heart of why Knowledge has so many issues with gaining acceptance as a reference-able source,

1204:

Is this correct? If so, then do I simply just upload the image to the general production space, even before the article is approved? If not, is there some other way of handling this that is considered to be preferable and/or correct?

1315:

The word choice "doesn't count" is unfortunately ambiguous - in this case it means - is not allowed. A fair use image may be used only once in only one page which must be in mainspace, so it may not be added while it is still a draft.

180:

Thank you very much for this explanation. I was not really thinking of using colors in articles; I was just relating to html code or whatever Knowledge runs on. I have seen people use colors and cool stuff in signatures, and I was

3813:

I'm new to editing a wiki page & I'm trying to learn about whether or not it's possible to permanently change the title or page name of a wiki page. Does anyone know if it is? If so, how would I as a user make this change?

2769:

Determining notability on a case-by-case basis, with no clear standards and based on nothing more than conflicting opinions, is what leads to inconsistent article quality and to poor faith in the ability of WP admins to govern,

130:. You update it in "my preferences" at the top. In this namespace, you can sometimes just use templates. For example, {{red|Hello}} {{blue|and}} {{orange (color)|welcome}} {{green|to}} {{purple|the}} {{yellow|Teahouse}} yields 399:

I'm not an administrator, but am quite experienced with Twinkle. If you would like to discuss it privately, please reply to my email. Alternatively I am sure that one of the sysops who frequent the teahouse will be happy to

2805:

By the way, I also wanted to add that I believe there is nowhere, in any definition of what is or isn't a cite-able source (both, on and off wikipedia), that clearly states and says that the topic in the article has to be

3388:

message to get their attention, directing them to the page where you've commented. Otherwise, just wait it out - and if no-one replies at all, you can assume that whatever you're proposing is probably going to be okay.

3449:

to the top of the section followed by your question, and someone "should" be by within half an hour to an hour to assist you. If for some reason, no-one stops by to help, you can always ask your question here, at the

1906:

If the video is copyrighted then a screenshot from it will attract the same copyright as the video, so you will only be able to use it if it meets the licensing requirements at Commons or the non-free content criteria

1469:(GNG) that apply here. Just because it might appear to be a fairly obscure subject to a lay reader is not a reason for non-inclusion if the subject does meet the GNG. There are other articles on non human genes like 621:. There are some suggestions at the top of the article as to how to further improve it. (Often, the best way to deal with the COI issue is to improve the neutrality of the article and the neutrality of its wording.) -- 2810:

in the source you want to cite, for it to be cite-able or noteworthy. All that source has to have is the data or information that proves what is being written about, in the topic that intends to use such data and/or

1634:

where the consensus seems to be that it's unworkable when the different uses of words, not just spelling, between British and American English (let alone any other variant) were considered. There is a section in the

1535:. The code is {{PEPB|Multimédia|multimídia}}, however, when I tried inserting it on the English article (as AmEBrE) it did not work. Does anyone know how I can write this code for English pages? Thank you very much, 574:

specifically discourages using only colour shading, diagonal lines or any other form of formatting to convey information in tables. If there's no content for a cell, the convention is simply to leave it blank.

1230:

special needs to be done. However, you bring up a special case, which does merit further discussion. It is quite common, the usual case, in fact, that logos are not uploaded as free images, but used under our

1501:

Indeed you've answered it yourself - "has been written about in dozens of papers" (presumably in mainstream scientific journals) so that's the notability requirement met right there. I'm sure the folks at

3740:), and b) you use the full name early in the article, and tie the acronym to it, like this: "Object-based attention (OBA) is...", you should be fine. Knowledge uses an in-house style guide known as the 3906:

asking why he thought the link was appropriate, and noting that if the reason is a misspelling it's unlikely someone would make that mistake. After three days with no response I removed the Groove-: -->

2233:

Yo, Tito. It's probably that script that's doing it, then; it's really old, and looking at the source, I'm nearly certain it doesn't work any more. Try removing the script and see if things come back.

420:

Ah, I see what happened. You used one of Twinkle's rollback tools, which in turn is designed to place a message on the talk page of the user whose edits are being rollbacked. So no, it wasn't hacked.

3713:

I am drafting an article on 'object-based attention'. As this phrase will be used extensively throughout the article, may I use an acronym (such as OBA) to save repetitive use of the phrase? Thanks.

3556:

If there is no response on the talk page, try taking the your queries to the articles WikiProject talk page. This is done by clicking on the WikiProject link at the top of the talk page, for example

2206:

It seems for some reason javascript is not working in my Knowledge account. Any script, formatting toolbar is not loading and can not perform any javascript task. I am using Firefox, Option: -->

1931:

page? Copyrights can be tricky and I think you would be the safest by asking those people. My belief is that screenshots of a music video are still going to fall under "derivative works" that

1461:

Keilana, welcome to the Teahouse. Fascinating question, I don't think there is a specific set of notability guidelines for nonhuman genes. Certainly I couldn't see one referred to anywhere at

2686:

By legal standards, a judge would tell you that even if there is less than a sentence that refers to something, in a document published by what would be considered a reputable source, it is

1168:

on the talk page and reach consensus. Please be sure that any new content you add is properly referenced to a reliable source. This is especially important for biographies of living people.

2210:

Javascript is turned on. I have checked w3school's JS tutorial, there it is working. So, it is not a problem of Firefox settings. I thought it was a Knowledge issue, I asked another editor

3153:

If this is incorrect, please point us to the actual WIkipedia policy that documents the requirement for extensive coverage of a topic before it is worthy to be written about in Knowledge.

3021:

Hello and welcome Wikicandyman! Knowledge is not designed to have individual articles about everything that exists. Instead, Knowledge is designed to have articles about subjects

1065:

Paradoxically, this page here has decided to do things the opposite way to the rest of Knowledge, and it expects new questions to be at the top of the page. Yes, it's confusing! -

3140:, before it could be covered as an article or topic in a Knowledge article. In fact, the only mentions are that a source that references a topic within an article needs to be 1788:

Asking every editor to vote on different pictures every week or so, what happened to these galleries? Would love to save the links to a few of these pics. Thanks in advance.

967:! I would suggest that your best chance of finding someone interested in making the changes to the band's article would be to post a request on the talk page of one of the 3522:

should be used anywhere that I have seen brewing up. There are fragments of it everywhere, so I won't list all of the discussions here. I'm actually thinking perhaps an

3358:

Some pages are watched more heavily than others. Some of your questions might have easier answers. I'm guessing it's not because people are intentionally ignoring you. --

1738:

Possibly writing the article in the Arabic Knowledge would be a way to start. As more references are developed it could be translated to the English Knowledge. Regards,

3512:

I'm aware of the namespace conceptions surrounding the help request related templates and there is a discussion (that I wouldn't be surprised if it is a perennial) that

3675:, though there may be other userboxes that are not listed there. If you want more information on userboxes, including on how to creat your own userbox, take a look at 3560:, then goi to the talk page of the wikiproject you clicked on and post there. Do not forget to mention which page you are talking about at the wikiproject. Yours ever, 553: 3793:

Hi Kjc2! No, there is no such rule. You can submit as many as you like, except that after you've submitted five, you need to start reviewing as well as submitting. --

3470:

hurry to get an answer, you can always click on the link at the top of this page to go to the IRC help channel. I hope this helps and good luck in future endeavors!

1885:

Hello everyone...again. Can I upload a screenshot from a Musical Video to add it to the main article of that song, with the proper licensing for this kind of files??

1550:

Sorry, the code was transformed when I submitted the question. I put some spaces so you can see it written down!! Here: { { PEPB |Multimédia | multimídia } } Thanks!

2397:. I've been able to use the class Wikitable to create and center the table but I can't get it to eliminate all borders and background color. Here's the example... 3595:

Hi, Pokebub. Thanks for stopping by the Teahouse. I am not sure what you are speaking of. Do you mean the userbox organizer thingie like I have on my userpage?

1631: 1387: 488:

and welcome to the Teahouse. Could you link to something demonstrating what you are attempting to accomplish? I'm not entirely sure what you are looking for.

3343:

I occasionally ask questions on talk pages. Sometimes I get responses soon, other times never. I am wondering why this is... Do people just like to ignore me?

3029:

subject in question: You've written an proposed article about a piece of software, but there is no evidence that the software has been written about by anyone

1267:

about non-free file use. If you need to use an image in your draft to get a feel for formating and layout/sizing or whatnot, the recommended file to do so is

522:

As far as I know there is no way to do this in HTML or in Wikimarkup. I think you would have to use an image in some way, probably as the background in CSS. --

1754:

Although we prefer English sources on the English Knowledge, there is no rule against using non-English sources. The key consideration is that they must be

3858:

For background, user Porter kendra has several times deleted sourced content, added unsourced or promotional text, and been notified of COI guidelines.

1935:, but I'm not an authority. I would hate to give you the wrong information. :) I would be happy to help you ask the copyright people if you wish. :) 393: 98: 93: 88: 76: 71: 63: 3227:

enough writing to actually write a detailed article here. Thus the need for extensive (significant, non-trivial, in-depth, etc, etc.) sources. --

3745: 571: 2248:

Exactly! Wonderful catch! Uff, I did not expect it. Thanks a lot for quickly pointing the error. In addition, I found the script's suggestion at

320:, it should stay. If the information is not supported by a source, or is drawn from the school's website or prospectus, give it the chop. Under 3117: 3043: 3007:

that more references were needed. Please look through the links given and try to provide independent sources regarding the subject. Regards,

1197:

I'm new to the Teahouse and this is my first question. I did check the archives but didn't see an obvious answer so I decided to post, here.

1272: 972: 3955: 3781: 876:

1ST7, welcome back. Can you supply links to the various articles so someone can have a look to see what can or needs to be done? Thanks.

646:

the sources we should be using, and instead we should be using secondary articles. Is this true, or should the primary literature be used?

2890:

Is there any guideline on usage of subsection links? You know, the wikilink at the top of some subsections that direct to other articles.

3526:

might be appropriate here and will draft one up in the next day or so. As for it being used to get an administrator, no... that is what

3498:, nowhere else. It's effect is to attract an admin to respond to your question, which you should post right after the Help me template. 840:. Repeated attempts to create the article elsewhere will only lead to a block on the editors and on any future pages about the company. 126:

Hi, welcome to the Teahouse. Generally, we do not include colored text in articles. For information on how to change your signature, see

3859: 3320: 3304: 3257:

hi the tags are fixed on the article how do I get rid of the cleanup tags from the article there are threeuuu 01:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

1723:

well, there are around 4 or 5 news paper articles there but mostly in Arabic because there is where he was mostly covered. any thoughts?

1101: 166: 2304:. Just go to the user's talk page and paste {{Knowledge:Teahouse/Badge/Answer|size=|message=Optional message|signed=~~~~}}. Cheers! -- 976: 746: 3004: 2240: 2177:

Hey XndrK. Unfortunately, the article does not qualify for DYK (at least not presently). A new article (one created or moved to the

2110: 1701: 1048: 951: 823: 3034:

company that's also created the software. The relevant Knowledge policies and guidelines you'll want to read to learn more are at

2346: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 605:

Hello. I am trying to get this article for Changemakrs.com ready and neutral for resubmission. So, any feedback would be helpful.

3940:

Hi and welcome to the Teahouse! I'd say that the best way to avoid an edit war if TheTruthiness does not respond is to request a

264:) and that some combinations of font colour and background colour can be very hard to read, particularly for old farts like me.-- 3895:

in it. Since "Grove" has nothing to do with "Groove", and no one would come to the Groove page looking for Grove, I removed it.

3273: 2851:

Knowledge-level notable - and I don't think that is true. Generally, multiple sources are needed to establish notability - see

2275: 1223: 837: 410: 1768:

template (completing as many of the parameters as possible) so that a reader can find and verify the source if they wish to.--

309: 3580:

I just want to know if there are Userbox Towers here on Knowledge like there are in other wikis. Thx if anyone replys to me.

3122: 3047: 1503: 1462: 1004: 1580:

is what you are having trouble with, and if I understand you correctly, that is not an enwiki template, but can be found at

3439:

not the case, it is simply a matter of being not noticed instead of ignored. There is some good news! You can often add

3399: 2249: 2227: 585: 334: 292: 260:

Please note though that coloured text should not be used in articles unless there are very good reasons for doing so (see

3136:

In no policy, above, was there a single sentence that said that the topic of a Knowledge article had to be written about

2665:

talk page section I linked is rather long and might be too much to read through for people unfamiliar with this article.

3643:

on your page, and between them place the userboxes you want, including their curly brackets (e.g. to add the userbox at

3557: 2115:

You can inform me when you'll be ready to nominate one article, I'll try to be there to show you things step by step! --

1932: 1259:

is absolutely right in what he was telling you about. I've been spending a lot of time recently working on sandbox and

21: 1100:

along with a description of how it works using links to related concepts. Is this in keeping with Knowledge's policies?

3127: 3051: 1831: 321: 1584:, is that correct? I am at a loss considering my unfamiliarity with any language other than en-us (don't laugh at me 441:

just the little drop down list of things at the top of the page. It also has a couple of other features including a

2106: 1231: 42: 932:

arrange tickets or an album for anyone who can help manage these changes. Thanks. George James Script wiki page:

3741: 2946: 2361: 2191: 2067: 1866: 1839: 1636: 1592:). Perhaps based on my links here though, someone who is familiar will be able to assist you better. Good luck! 767: 2814:

Am I wrong about this and, if so, can someone point me to the clear and written statement that proves otherwise?

3949: 3775: 3102:

is inaccurate. For example, I went through all of the references (i.e. Wiki Policy Articles) you cited, above:

1383: 1379: 1070: 861:

should be merged, as there is now no reason for the redirect, but am not sure where or how to request this. --

608: 1355:, thanks for the workaround. I'll use the example.jpg as a test to make sure things work. My Best, Frank -- 3903: 3863: 3825: 3774:

Is there some rule that says you can't submit two DYK hooks (for two different articles) at the same time?

3324: 3295: 3112: 3039: 2908: 2896: 2606:

Hope that is the answer you were looking for! If you need more details or assistance, let me know! Cheers!

1446: 1105: 688: 358: 189: 157: 116: 3798: 3665: 3637: 3541: 3475: 2993: 2968: 2611: 2532: 2416: 2357: 2052: 1940: 1597: 1411: 1336: 1280: 1084: 1014: 626: 561: 493: 450: 366: 243: 3821: 3565: 2237: 1044: 968: 947: 912: 819: 296: 285: 3728:

Hello PilgrimB, and welcome! Yes, I believe that, so long as a) the acronym is used frequently in the

2989: 1398:

in it, chances are fairly high you are not in article) is not allowed. The exceptions it mentions are

1040: 964: 943: 3416: 3348: 3261: 3107: 3035: 2942: 2867: 2735: 2670: 2214:, he told he did not face any issue. The only settings/script related change I have done recently is 2187: 2063: 1927:

and welcome back to the Teahouse! Might I suggest that such questions might be best answered by the

1862: 1835: 1621: 1555: 1540: 1424:

Thanks, again, to all who helped. I appreciate the timely and detailed responses. My Best, Frank --

1241: 1036: 939: 811: 651: 425: 305: 3265: 1802:

Hey Marketdiamond. I'm wondering if you're thinking of the contest at our sister site, the Commons:

3961: 3945: 3934: 3930: 3867: 3849: 3829: 3802: 3787: 3763: 3722: 3696: 3685: 3655: 3648: 3644: 3627: 3618: 3614: 3604: 3589: 3585: 3569: 3545: 3530: 3507: 3479: 3420: 3404: 3367: 3352: 3328: 3309: 3269: 3242: 3199: 3172: 3069: 3016: 2997: 2972: 2950: 2901: 2871: 2829: 2788: 2739: 2710: 2674: 2643: 2615: 2501: 2382: 2365: 2331: 2313: 2294: 2261: 2257: 2243: 2223: 2195: 2178: 2170: 2166: 2154: 2124: 2120: 2099: 2071: 2042: 2032: 2028: 2013: 1993: 1971: 1965: 1944: 1916: 1900: 1894: 1870: 1856: 1843: 1796: 1777: 1747: 1732: 1724: 1717: 1697: 1690: 1682: 1665: 1625: 1601: 1575: 1559: 1544: 1515: 1496: 1482: 1455: 1433: 1415: 1364: 1340: 1325: 1306: 1284: 1246: 1183: 1176: 1161: 1153: 1140: 1133: 1109: 1088: 1074: 1066: 1052: 1018: 955: 916: 893: 885: 870: 849: 827: 793: 789: 779: 759: 755: 747:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Lgoeu4u0-lk/Trf_09KXnyI/AAAAAAAAAgg/4hH1pJAEN9s/s400/Rory%2BGallagher.jpg

727: 712: 705: 692: 677: 670: 655: 630: 617:

Hi and welcome to the teahouse! This submission seems to have been accepted, and is now located at

590: 565: 531: 527: 517: 513: 497: 478: 474: 454: 428: 415: 406: 370: 339: 273: 247: 193: 173: 127: 120: 1079:

Yes, it can be very confusing for this page. I monitor both ends of the page for that reason. ;)

3911: 3899: 3756: 3718: 3600: 3503: 3429: 3374: 3359: 3290: 3235: 3195: 3168: 3062: 3012: 2956: 2935: 2891: 2825: 2784: 2706: 2639: 2497: 2327: 2309: 2290: 2144: 2089: 1849: 1789: 1762: 1743: 1728: 1713: 1686: 1645: 1511: 1429: 1360: 1321: 1302: 1219: 1157: 723: 697:

Thanks for your kind words, StarryGrandma, and feel free to quote any of my answers as you wish.

684: 618: 202: 185: 150: 112: 51: 17: 3922:

So, my questions: 1) Should these links be left out? 2) If so, how should I avoid an edit war?

987:

guideline before you do that. If you do edit it yourself, it would be in your best interest to

3794: 3537: 3471: 3458:, or if it is a general question not related to editing wikipedia itself you could ask at the 3393: 3383: 2964: 2960: 2625: 2607: 2183: 1989: 1936: 1912: 1773: 1613: 1593: 1407: 1352: 1332: 1276: 1080: 1010: 622: 579: 557: 489: 446: 362: 328: 269: 239: 3692: 3681: 3561: 3516: 3488: 3443: 3363: 2925: 2661: 2378: 2234: 2147: 2092: 1640: 1632:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)/Archive 111#British English / American English converter?

1268: 908: 815: 442: 1392:" That means that using non-free content in any namespace other than article (if it has a 3845: 3672: 3435: 3412: 3344: 2863: 2753: 2731: 2666: 2141: 2086: 1661: 1617: 1569: 1551: 1536: 1478: 1294: 1256: 1236: 1061: 980: 933: 881: 845: 775: 647: 421: 389: 301: 261: 2347:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Policy_Studies_Organization

2023:

Every time I post the code on my userpage. Everything gets messed up. Can someone help?

804: 3926: 3836: 3733: 3610: 3581: 2860: 2253: 2219: 2162: 2116: 2024: 1958: 1924: 1887: 1373: 1264: 1169: 1126: 988: 866: 785: 751: 698: 663: 523: 509: 485: 470: 402: 1758:

like any other source. So by all means use the Arabic sources and cite them using the

3749: 3714: 3676: 3596: 3523: 3499: 3316: 3228: 3191: 3186: 3164: 3079: 3055: 3008: 2915: 2852: 2821: 2780: 2702: 2635: 2508: 2493: 2323: 2305: 2301: 2286: 2134: 2009: 1739: 1709: 1507: 1466: 1425: 1369: 1356: 1317: 1298: 1260: 1252: 1215: 1122: 984: 904: 903:

Changing a redirect is not considered a merger and doesn't have to be requested. See

719: 549: 3941: 3737: 3729: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3390: 3288:, and there should be the tags at the top of the page, simply remove them. Cheers! 1985: 1954: 1928: 1908: 1769: 1581: 1492: 1451: 1117: 995: 897: 576: 434: 354: 325: 265: 231: 223: 215: 1235:

as non-free (which I recommend) it should be done after the article goes "live".--

1984:

I am pretty sure you will get the same answer at MCQ as I have given you above.--

3465: 2113:, write hook and other things asked in that page, transclude it in the DYK page. 1755: 1705: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

205:! To answer your question, yes, we just use plain HTML/CSS to color text like 3841: 3690:

Heh, just took a look at your userpage and you seem to have it figured out! –

2138: 2083: 2059: 1704:. He seems interesting, but you have done nothing in the article to show his 1657: 1488: 1474: 877: 841: 771: 385: 219: 3484:

Just want to clarify one thing that might have slipped Technical 13's mind;

2907:

Hi Pass a Method. The only guideline I know of that is directly relevant is

2133:

Thanks. I was wondering about that. In case you were wondering, the page is

862: 2345:

cause in the long run. The article I am trying to create can be seen here:

2657: 1060:

Part of the reason why you didn't get a quick response to your message on

3898:

Recently the editor who originally put in the link from Groove to Grove (

3835:

Kendra, welcome to the Teahouse. Pages can be renamed by the process of

2570: 2454: 2389:

How do I eliminate all cell borders and background colors in a Wikitable?

2005: 1470: 505: 2349:, as well as the two comments I have received from 2 separate editors. 2137:. (Give me a few minutes after I post this. I'm still working on it.) -- 609:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/ChangeMakrs

3915: 3411:

Okay. I'll just add the information needed to Isotopes of Xenon, then.

2594: 2478: 1125:

and do not want to be accused of promotional editing. I wish you well.

3902:) reverted my edit with no explanation. I posted on his talk page at 3888: 3876: 2544: 2428: 1649: 545: 214:

You can pick any color and text that you want. Keep in mind the that

3840:

consider if the request is correct and carry out the move for you.

2151: 2096: 770:. I hope there is something there that you think is more suitable. 2038:

Hey Pokebub22. I have organized your userboxes using the templates

1029:

Thanks for your detailed info. very helpful will do he following.

3892: 3880: 3089:

You wrote: "Knowledge is designed to have articles about subjects

2656:

I have a question about newsworthiness vs. notability. There is a

2556: 2440: 1653: 1190:

When is the proper time, in an article's life cycle to add images?

300:

over it and give me some guidance I would appreciate it. Regards,

235: 3904:

User_talk:TheTruthiness#What_does_Grove_have_to_do_with_Groove.3F

3148:

for the author that wrote about that topic in source being cited.

1444:

Hey everyone, I was pondering writing an article about a gene in

3671:

templates. You can find many userboxes, sorted by category, at

2859:

written is simple factual information that is unchallenged. See

2582: 2486:

Does anyone know how to eliminate borders and background color?

2466: 541: 378: 29: 3817:

Any guidance around this issue would be helpful. Thank you.

2082:

How do you nominate an article for "Did You Know?" stuff? --

1700:. Welcome to the Teahouse. I took a look at your article, 1532: 1402:

rare and I wouldn't even attempt to apply for one without a

928: 3919:

inappropriate. However, I don't want to start an edit war.

3003:

Thanks for asking at the Teahouse! The reviewer indicated

2353:

advice you would have to help me on my quest to approval!

991:

and declare a "possible" conflict of interest by attaching

2959:

and welcome to the Teahouse! Are you perhaps looking for

2631:

This is a very simple and clear answer. Thank you for it.

2393:

Hi, I'm working on an article and trying to incorporate a

1271:

although you could technically use any file listed in the

111:

How do I put colored text in articles, my signature, etc?

3284:

Once the tags are fixed, you may remove them by clicking

1152:

something I am not suppose to and upset someone. thanks!

971:

interested in that that page. I would suggest asking on

805:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Thanatkorn_International_co,.Ltd

379:

Can one's account be hacked in WP through the use of TW?

2691:

of standards so that "opinions" matter less than facts.

2215: 2211: 1331:

use of one image on multiple pages. Just let me know!

1255:! I'm glad you brought your question to the Teahouse. 901: 469:

e.g. to put a diagonal line across a single table cell

3736:

all of the text in your article (that is, you aren't

540:Sorry for my delay... There "are" ways to do this. 3744:, and the specific section that deals with this is 3907:Grove link, along with a corresponding Grove-: --> 1378:Non-free content is allowed only in articles (not 1009:to the top of the article's talk page. Good luck! 316:article is supported by a reliable source that is 3914:has just reverted my edits again, citing "as per 3091:which other people have written extensively about 3023:which other people have written extensively about 2109:, then create a new subpage for your nomination. 1630:Zalunardo8, this topic was discussed recently at 357:standard with that balance, just as "my" article 556:. I'm afraid that is the best I can offer you. 3891:disambiguation page had an unexplained link to 1848:Thanks Fuhghettaboutit, thats it! Great work! 601:Need feedback on article before resubmitting... 291:Over the past few days I have been editing the 1702:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Wael Nasr 2515:which is what causes that formatting like so: 8: 3609:Yes that is what I mean, how do I make one? 1784:Months ago there was a picture contest . . . 905:Help:Redirect#Creating and editing redirects 2340:Appropriate Sources vs. Superfluous Sources 2322:Thank you. That's simple enough. Frank -- 1957: 1953:Well, thank you both. I already asked at 1886: 1208:Thanks for any assistance you can offer. 1189: 637:Regarding the references of an article... 3462:. The last alternative if you are in a 2402: 465:How to put diagonal lines in wikitables? 283: 3746:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Abbreviations 2507:Hello and welcome back to the Teahouse 2270:How do I award a Teahouse Answer Badge? 1533:http://pt.wikipedia.org/Multim%C3%A9dia 784:Thanks! I will check out the commons. 3118:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources 3044:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources 2979:Wondering why my article was declined. 2279:question. Could someone please help? 1095:submission of article on a new process 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2250:Knowledge:Tools/Editing_tools#secEdit 800:please help to keep this page on wiki 7: 3944:from someone and if that fails, try 2201: 1585: 979:who have both indicated interest on 923:The Script Management Urgent Changes 433:Yes, to make this a little clearer, 1491:! This is why I love the Teahouse. 1001:to the top of the article page and 896:. I changed the redirect target to 2062:if you want to fiddle with this.-- 1568:Hello and welcome to the Teahouse 963:Hello and welcome to the Teahouse 201:Hello and welcome to the Teahouse 28: 3809:Changing Page Name of a Wiki page 2911:. See also the documentation for 2274:Hi, I read the Knowledge article 2202:My browser's Knowledge javascript 2105:First check if the article meets 3221:is a human being. He has a job. 2588: 2576: 2564: 2550: 2538: 2526: 2472: 2460: 2448: 2434: 2422: 2410: 1808:Commons:Picture of the Year/2011 1804:Commons:Picture of the Year/2012 1586: 1147:Editing a semi protected article 33: 3215:article needs to be more than: 3098:I believe your use of the word 2276:Knowledge:Teahouse/Badge/Answer 838:Knowledge:Articles for creation 768:commons:category:Rory Gallagher 295:page. I recently stumbled onto 3738:inventing the acronym yourself 3123:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 3048:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 1463:Knowledge:WikiProject Genetics 1: 3887:A month ago I found that the 3144:and that the topic has to be 1526:Differentiating language uses 1467:general notability guidelines 542:http://jsfiddle.net/zw3Ve/21/ 445:feature. I hope this helps! 1656:(US Eng). Hope this helps. 1506:would be happy to help you. 1273:Knowledge image placeholders 907:for how to edit a redirect. 426:Feel free to drop a message. 3128:Knowledge:FAQ/Organizations 3052:Knowledge:FAQ/Organizations 2520:Table of Related Countries 2404:Table of Related Countries 1832:Knowledge:Featured pictures 613:--10:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 3978: 3496:only on your own Talk page 3185:The first bullet point of 2961:WP:SECTION#Section linking 2395:Table of Related Countries 1644:concerned then the use of 1406:good reason. Good luck! 1275:category. Happy editing! 1232:Knowledge:Non-free content 3742:Knowledge:Manual of style 3054:. I hope this helps. -- 1032:Much appreciated George 929:http://www.jamesgrant.com 348:It's a bit harsh to chop 3962:15:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3935:15:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3868:16:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3850:15:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3830:15:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3803:18:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3788:15:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3764:00:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC) 3723:00:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC) 3697:02:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3686:01:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 3619:01:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3605:04:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3590:04:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3570:23:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3546:19:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3508:18:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3480:13:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3421:13:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3405:13:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3368:13:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3353:13:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3329:11:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3310:03:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3243:17:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3200:16:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3173:14:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3070:04:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3017:04:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2998:04:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2973:12:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2951:12:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2902:12:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2872:18:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2830:17:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2789:16:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2740:15:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2711:13:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2675:12:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2644:15:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2616:15:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2502:14:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2383:01:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 2371:Generally speaking, you 2366:16:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2332:18:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2314:17:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2295:17:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2262:18:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2244:18:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2228:17:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2196:21:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2171:19:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2155:18:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2125:18:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2100:18:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2078:Did You Know nominations 2072:22:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2033:22:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 2014:19:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1994:18:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1972:17:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1945:17:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1917:17:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1901:17:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1871:23:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1857:06:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1844:01:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1797:19:11, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1778:17:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1748:07:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1733:06:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1718:05:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1691:05:38, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1666:16:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1652:(Brit Eng) redirects to 1626:14:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1602:14:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1578:|Multimédia|multimídia}} 1560:14:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1545:14:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1516:18:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1497:16:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1483:16:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1456:14:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1434:18:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1416:17:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1365:17:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1341:18:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1326:17:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1307:17:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1285:15:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1247:15:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1224:15:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 1184:04:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 1162:03:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 1141:04:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 1110:04:12, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 1089:13:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1075:13:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1053:13:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 1019:12:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 956:12:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 917:10:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 886:10:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 871:04:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 850:10:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 828:04:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 794:12:33, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 780:08:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 760:18:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 728:19:11, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 713:21:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 693:19:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 678:07:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 656:07:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 631:18:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 591:07:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 566:15:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 532:15:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 518:06:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 498:17:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 479:14:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 455:16:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 429:16:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 416:16:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 394:16:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 371:18:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 340:07:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 310:14:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 274:17:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 248:21:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 208:Green Text</span: --> 194:20:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 174:20:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 121:19:50, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 3732:you are using when you 3113:Knowledge:Verifiability 3040:Knowledge:Verifiability 2909:Knowledge:Summary style 1676:any thoughts on my post 1648:is called for, example 1504:WP:WikiProject Genetics 1447:Drosophila melanogaster 544:shows an example using 359:Anthony Chenevix-Trench 107:How to use colored text 3647:to your page, place {{ 2773:Am I wrong about this? 2652:Newsworthy vs. notable 2533:Bosnia and Herzegovina 2489:Thanks for your help. 2417:Bosnia and Herzegovina 1933:we talked about before 1473:so I'd say go for it. 973:WikiProject Rock music 284:I think I'm guilty of 3883:: common misspelling? 2511:! Simply remove the 1263:alternatives for the 1005:Connected contributor 892:I guess you refer to 318:not the school itself 224:HTML 4.0 Transitional 46:of past discussions. 3679:. Happy editing! – 3108:Knowledge:Notability 3036:Knowledge:Notability 1465:so I think it's the 1380:disambiguation pages 1123:conflict of interest 1121:You may well have a 985:conflict of interest 927:Hi Wiki, I work for 807:it is a good sorce 322:WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE 3649:User:Dr.UserBox/Red 3645:User:Dr.UserBox/Red 2521: 2405: 1955:copyright questions 1929:copyright questions 1440:Notability of Genes 977:WikiProject Ireland 894:Under Covers (NCIS) 740:copyright of images 570:As it happens, the 443:revert and rollback 234:and is not part of 3912:User:TheTruthiness 3900:User:TheTruthiness 3558:WikiProject Cities 3339:Article Talk Pages 2519: 2403: 1637:WP:Manual of style 411:List of good deeds 18:Knowledge:Teahouse 3433: 3378: 3278: 3264:comment added by 2658:heated discussion 2600: 2599: 2513:class="wikitable" 2484: 2483: 2179:article mainspace 1384:article namespace 1118:original research 1056: 1039:comment added by 959: 942:comment added by 831: 814:comment added by 218:element has been 104: 103: 58: 57: 52:current main page 3969: 3958: 3952: 3784: 3778: 3759: 3752: 3670: 3664: 3660: 3654: 3642: 3636: 3632: 3626: 3535: 3529: 3521: 3515: 3500:Roger (Dodger67) 3493: 3487: 3454:, at one of the 3448: 3442: 3427: 3402: 3396: 3387: 3372: 3300: 3277: 3258: 3238: 3231: 3192:Roger (Dodger67) 3082: 3065: 3058: 2941:. Best regards-- 2940: 2934: 2930: 2924: 2920: 2914: 2899: 2894: 2662:Suburban Express 2660:going on on the 2593: 2592: 2591: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2522: 2518: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2406: 2057: 2051: 2047: 2041: 1970: 1968: 1963: 1899: 1897: 1892: 1881:Video Screenshot 1854: 1834:. Best regards-- 1794: 1767: 1761: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1582:pt:Template:PEPB 1579: 1508:Roger (Dodger67) 1318:Roger (Dodger67) 1269:File:Example.jpg 1244: 1239: 1181: 1179:Let's discuss it 1173: 1138: 1136:Let's discuss it 1130: 1055: 1033: 1008: 1000: 994: 958: 936: 830: 808: 720:Roger (Dodger67) 710: 708:Let's discuss it 702: 675: 673:Let's discuss it 667: 588: 582: 414: 413: 337: 331: 213: 210:which gives you 209: 171: 164: 155: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 3977: 3976: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3960: 3956: 3950: 3885: 3811: 3786: 3782: 3776: 3772: 3757: 3750: 3711: 3673:Template:WP:UBS 3668: 3662: 3658: 3652: 3651:}} between the 3640: 3634: 3630: 3624: 3578: 3533: 3527: 3519: 3513: 3491: 3485: 3468: 3446: 3440: 3400: 3394: 3381: 3341: 3296: 3259: 3255: 3236: 3229: 3080: 3063: 3056: 2981: 2943:Fuhghettaboutit 2938: 2932: 2928: 2922: 2918: 2912: 2897: 2892: 2888: 2886:Subsection link 2654: 2589: 2587: 2577: 2575: 2565: 2563: 2551: 2549: 2539: 2537: 2527: 2525: 2473: 2471: 2461: 2459: 2449: 2447: 2435: 2433: 2423: 2421: 2411: 2409: 2391: 2358:Whitney Shepard 2342: 2272: 2204: 2188:Fuhghettaboutit 2080: 2064:Fuhghettaboutit 2055: 2049: 2045: 2039: 2021: 1966: 1959: 1895: 1888: 1883: 1863:Fuhghettaboutit 1853: 1850: 1836:Fuhghettaboutit 1793: 1790: 1786: 1765: 1759: 1678: 1587: 1573: 1528: 1442: 1396: 1382:), and only in 1242: 1237: 1192: 1177: 1171: 1149: 1134: 1128: 1097: 1062:Talk:The_Script 1034: 1002: 998: 992: 937: 934:Talk:The_Script 925: 858: 809: 802: 742: 706: 700: 671: 665: 639: 603: 586: 580: 572:Manual of Style 508:you could use. 467: 405: 401: 381: 335: 329: 289: 232:HTML 4.0 Strict 211: 206: 167: 158: 151: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 109: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3975: 3973: 3965: 3964: 3954: 3884: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3853: 3852: 3810: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3780: 3771: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3710: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3577: 3576:Userbox Towers 3574: 3573: 3572: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3494:is to be used 3464: 3460:reference desk 3424: 3423: 3408: 3407: 3370: 3340: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3254: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3161: 3159: 3156: 3154: 3151: 3149: 3134: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3125: 3120: 3115: 3110: 3103: 3096: 3094: 3087: 3085: 3073: 3072: 3019: 2983:Article name: 2980: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2953: 2887: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2856: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2818: 2815: 2812: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2757: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2714: 2713: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2692: 2683: 2682: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2632: 2629: 2619: 2618: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2585: 2573: 2560: 2559: 2547: 2535: 2517: 2516: 2482: 2481: 2469: 2457: 2444: 2443: 2431: 2419: 2400: 2390: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2341: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2317: 2316: 2271: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2203: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2174: 2173: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2128: 2127: 2114: 2079: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2020: 2017: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1948: 1947: 1920: 1919: 1882: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1851: 1791: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1751: 1750: 1721: 1720: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1563: 1562: 1527: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1394: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1310: 1309: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1077: 1067:David Biddulph 1027: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1007:|GeorgeHOOKD}} 989:cover your ass 924: 921: 920: 919: 889: 888: 857: 854: 853: 852: 801: 798: 797: 796: 782: 741: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 638: 635: 634: 633: 602: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 535: 534: 520: 501: 500: 466: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 380: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 343: 342: 297:WP:SCHOOLCRUFT 293:Hilton College 288: 286:WP:SCHOOLCRUFT 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 253: 252: 251: 250: 183: 182: 177: 176: 108: 105: 102: 101: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3974: 3963: 3959: 3953: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3923: 3920: 3917: 3913: 3909: 3908:Groove link. 3905: 3901: 3896: 3894: 3890: 3882: 3878: 3875: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3860:99.149.85.229 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3851: 3847: 3843: 3838: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3822:Porter kendra 3818: 3815: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3785: 3779: 3769: 3765: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3753: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3708: 3698: 3695: 3694: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3684: 3683: 3678: 3674: 3667: 3666:userboxbottom 3657: 3650: 3646: 3639: 3638:userboxbottom 3629: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3554: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3532: 3525: 3518: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3490: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3467: 3461: 3457: 3456:village pumps 3453: 3445: 3437: 3431: 3430:edit conflict 3426: 3425: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3409: 3406: 3403: 3397: 3392: 3385: 3376: 3375:edit conflict 3371: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3338: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3321:99.149.85.229 3318: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3307: 3306: 3301: 3299: 3293: 3292: 3291:JackFrost2121 3287: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3252: 3244: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3232: 3225: 3220: 3217: 3216: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3188: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3160: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3133: 3129: 3126: 3124: 3121: 3119: 3116: 3114: 3111: 3109: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3101: 3097: 3095: 3092: 3088: 3086: 3083: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3059: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2984: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2957:Pass a Method 2954: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2937: 2927: 2917: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2900: 2895: 2893:Pass a Method 2885: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2862: 2857: 2854: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2816: 2813: 2809: 2808:written about 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2775: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2762: 2758: 2755: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2694: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2663: 2659: 2651: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2596: 2586: 2584: 2574: 2572: 2562: 2561: 2558: 2548: 2546: 2536: 2534: 2524: 2523: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2490: 2487: 2480: 2470: 2468: 2458: 2456: 2446: 2445: 2442: 2432: 2430: 2420: 2418: 2408: 2407: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2388: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2356:Many thanks, 2354: 2350: 2348: 2339: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2280: 2277: 2269: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2180: 2176: 2175: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2161:All right! -- 2160: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2136: 2135:Violet, Texas 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2098: 2094: 2091: 2088: 2085: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2054: 2053:Userboxbottom 2044: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2018: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2007: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1973: 1969: 1964: 1962: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1898: 1893: 1891: 1880: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1852:⧐ Diamond Way 1847: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1830:, as well as 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1795: 1792:⧐ Diamond Way 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1764: 1757: 1753: 1752: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1675: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1642: 1638: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1583: 1577: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1525: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1448: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1391: 1389: 1386:, subject to 1385: 1381: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1349: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1291: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1240: 1233: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1132: 1131: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1102:99.229.106.48 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1030: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1006: 997: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 961: 960: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 935: 930: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 899: 895: 891: 890: 887: 883: 879: 875: 874: 873: 872: 868: 864: 856:Merge Request 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 834: 833: 832: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 806: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 781: 777: 773: 769: 764: 763: 762: 761: 757: 753: 748: 739: 729: 725: 721: 716: 715: 714: 711: 709: 704: 703: 696: 695: 694: 690: 686: 685:StarryGrandma 681: 680: 679: 676: 674: 669: 668: 660: 659: 658: 657: 653: 649: 645: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 615: 614: 611: 610: 606: 600: 592: 589: 583: 578: 573: 569: 568: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 533: 529: 525: 521: 519: 515: 511: 507: 506:here's a link 503: 502: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 481: 480: 476: 472: 464: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 431: 430: 427: 423: 419: 418: 417: 412: 408: 404: 398: 397: 396: 395: 391: 387: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 341: 338: 332: 327: 323: 319: 314: 313: 312: 311: 307: 303: 298: 294: 287: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 216:<font: --> 207:<span: --> 204: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 191: 187: 179: 178: 175: 172: 170: 165: 163: 162: 156: 154: 129: 125: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 106: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3924: 3921: 3910: 3897: 3886: 3819: 3816: 3812: 3795:Demiurge1000 3773: 3755: 3754: 3712: 3691: 3680: 3579: 3538:Technical 13 3495: 3472:Technical 13 3463: 3342: 3303: 3298:Frostbitten? 3297: 3289: 3285: 3260:— Preceding 3256: 3234: 3233: 3218: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3099: 3090: 3061: 3060: 3030: 3026: 3022: 2990:Wikicandyman 2988: 2985: 2982: 2965:Technical 13 2889: 2811:information. 2807: 2760: 2687: 2655: 2626:Technical 13 2608:Technical 13 2601: 2512: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2399: 2394: 2392: 2377: 2372: 2355: 2351: 2343: 2284: 2281: 2273: 2208:Content: --> 2205: 2107:DYK criteria 2081: 2022: 2019:Badgeometers 2002: 1960: 1937:Technical 13 1889: 1884: 1787: 1722: 1679: 1614:Technical 13 1594:Technical 13 1529: 1445: 1443: 1408:Technical 13 1403: 1399: 1393: 1377: 1353:Technical 13 1333:Technical 13 1277:Technical 13 1213: 1210: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1178: 1170: 1150: 1135: 1127: 1098: 1081:Technical 13 1035:— Preceding 1031: 1028: 1011:Technical 13 969:WikiProjects 938:— Preceding 926: 898:Under Covers 859: 810:— Preceding 803: 743: 707: 699: 672: 664: 643: 640: 623:Demiurge1000 612: 607: 604: 558:Technical 13 490:Technical 13 468: 447:Technical 13 438: 382: 363:Demiurge1000 349: 317: 290: 240:Technical 13 227: 184: 168: 160: 159: 152: 128:WP:SIGNATURE 110: 82: 47: 41: 3942:3rd opinion 3927:Dan Griscom 3693:Philosopher 3682:Philosopher 3562:Czar Brodie 3536:is for. ;) 3138:extensively 3100:extensively 2986:Playwrite. 2759:You wrote: 2379:Philosopher 2235:Writ Keeper 2111:See details 1806:. See also 1041:GeorgeHOOKD 965:GeorgeHOOKD 944:GeorgeHOOKD 909:PrimeHunter 816:Do do doggy 619:ChangeMakrs 181:interested. 99:Archive 110 94:Archive 109 89:Archive 108 83:Archive 107 77:Archive 106 72:Archive 105 64:Archive 100 40:This is an 3656:userboxtop 3628:userboxtop 3531:Admin help 3436:Balgontork 3413:Balgontork 3345:Balgontork 3146:noteworthy 2864:AlmostGrad 2754:AlmostGrad 2732:AlmostGrad 2667:AlmostGrad 2254:Tito Dutta 2220:Tito Dutta 2163:Tito Dutta 2117:Tito Dutta 2060:web colors 2043:Userboxtop 1861:Anytime.-- 1706:notability 1618:Zalunardo8 1570:Zalunardo8 1552:Zalunardo8 1537:Zalunardo8 1388:exemptions 1374:the policy 1295:SPHILBRICK 1257:Sphilbrick 1238:SPhilbrick 981:The Script 648:Serotonick 422:TechFilmer 350:everything 302:Mattpbarry 220:deprecated 212:Green Text 3946:Mediation 3611:Pokebub22 3582:Pokebub22 3452:help desk 3286:edit page 3266:MovieDYSP 2936:Main list 2770:properly. 2766:opinions. 2184:this tool 2025:Pokebub22 1967:(zootalk) 1961:Miss Bono 1925:Miss Bono 1896:(zootalk) 1890:Miss Bono 1763:Cite news 1756:verfiable 1646:redirects 1641:WP:ENGVAR 1531:clearer: 1400:extremely 1211:My Best, 786:Mdebellis 752:Mdebellis 524:ColinFine 510:Koopatrev 486:Koopatrev 471:Koopatrev 403:Gilderien 361:can't. -- 161:Phightins 22:Questions 3925:Thanks, 3715:PilgrimB 3709:Acronyms 3597:Gtwfan52 3384:Talkback 3274:contribs 3262:unsigned 3253:tags fix 3219:John Doe 3165:FGuerino 3163:Frank -- 3158:My Best, 3142:reliable 3027:specific 3009:Ariconte 2822:FGuerino 2820:Frank -- 2781:FGuerino 2779:Frank -- 2776:My Best, 2703:FGuerino 2701:Frank -- 2696:My Best, 2636:FGuerino 2634:Frank -- 2571:Malaysia 2494:FGuerino 2492:Frank -- 2455:Malaysia 2324:FGuerino 2306:Glaisher 2302:FGuerino 2287:FGuerino 2285:Frank -- 2282:Thanks, 1740:Ariconte 1725:Amronasr 1710:Gtwfan52 1698:Amronasr 1683:Amronasr 1471:DmX gene 1426:FGuerino 1370:FGuerino 1357:FGuerino 1299:FGuerino 1253:FGuerino 1216:FGuerino 1214:Frank -- 1154:Rapidito 1049:contribs 1037:unsigned 952:contribs 940:unsigned 824:contribs 812:unsigned 504:Thanks, 262:WP:COLOR 147:Teahouse 20:‎ | 3916:MOS:DAB 3820:Kendra 3730:sources 3517:Help me 3489:Help me 3444:Help me 3391:Yunshui 3305:My Work 2926:details 2861:WP:PSTS 2817:Thanks, 2681:itself. 2595:Vietnam 2479:Vietnam 2258:contact 2224:contact 2167:contact 2121:contact 1986:ukexpat 1909:ukexpat 1907:here.-- 1770:ukexpat 1639:called 1493:Keilana 1487:Thanks 1452:Keilana 577:Yunshui 400:help.-- 326:Yunshui 266:ukexpat 228:invalid 138:welcome 43:archive 3889:Groove 3877:Groove 3837:moving 3751:Jayron 3677:WP:UBX 3623:Place 3434:Hello 3360:Onorem 3317:WP:SPA 3230:Jayron 3187:WP:GNG 3081:Jayron 3057:Jayron 3050:, and 2955:Hello 2853:WP:GNG 2545:Canada 2429:Canada 2300:Hello 2004:song.— 1923:Hello 1650:Colour 1372:, per 1351:Hello 1293:Hello 1265:policy 1251:Hello 1243:(Talk) 1172:Cullen 1129:Cullen 1025:Hello, 701:Cullen 666:Cullen 546:jQuery 484:Hello 3951:Jakob 3893:Grove 3881:Grove 3842:NtheP 3777:Jakob 3031:other 2557:Kenya 2509:Frank 2441:Kenya 2209:: --> 2207:: --> 1658:NtheP 1654:Color 1612:Dear 1489:NtheP 1475:NtheP 878:NtheP 842:NtheP 772:NtheP 435:WP:TW 386:Taram 355:WP:GA 236:HTML5 203:Lukus 186:Lukus 132:Hello 113:Lukus 16:< 3931:talk 3879:and 3864:talk 3846:talk 3826:talk 3799:talk 3734:cite 3719:talk 3661:and 3633:and 3615:talk 3601:talk 3586:talk 3566:talk 3542:talk 3504:talk 3476:talk 3466:real 3417:talk 3364:talk 3349:talk 3325:talk 3270:talk 3196:talk 3169:talk 3013:talk 3005:here 2994:talk 2969:talk 2947:talk 2931:and 2916:main 2898:talk 2868:talk 2826:talk 2785:talk 2736:talk 2707:talk 2688:both 2671:talk 2640:talk 2612:talk 2583:Mali 2498:talk 2467:Mali 2373:need 2362:talk 2328:talk 2310:talk 2291:talk 2252:. -- 2216:this 2212:here 2192:talk 2068:talk 2048:and 2029:talk 2010:talk 1990:talk 1941:talk 1913:talk 1867:talk 1840:talk 1828:2006 1826:and 1824:2007 1820:2008 1816:2009 1812:2010 1774:talk 1744:talk 1729:talk 1714:talk 1696:Hi, 1687:talk 1681:amr. 1662:talk 1622:talk 1598:talk 1576:PEPB 1556:talk 1541:talk 1512:talk 1479:talk 1430:talk 1412:talk 1404:real 1361:talk 1337:talk 1322:talk 1303:talk 1281:talk 1220:talk 1194:Hi, 1158:talk 1106:talk 1085:talk 1071:talk 1045:talk 1015:talk 975:and 948:talk 913:talk 882:talk 867:talk 863:1ST7 846:talk 820:talk 790:talk 776:talk 756:talk 724:talk 689:talk 652:talk 627:talk 562:talk 554:here 550:here 528:talk 514:talk 494:talk 475:talk 451:talk 407:Chat 390:talk 367:talk 306:talk 270:talk 244:talk 190:talk 117:talk 3948:. 3770:DYK 3524:RfC 3078:Hi 2752:Hi 2624:Hi 2006:Kww 1376:: " 1261:afc 996:COI 644:not 552:or 439:not 437:is 230:in 222:in 144:the 135:and 3957:C2 3933:) 3866:) 3848:) 3828:) 3801:) 3783:C2 3758:32 3721:) 3669:}} 3663:{{ 3659:}} 3653:{{ 3641:}} 3635:{{ 3631:}} 3625:{{ 3617:) 3603:) 3588:) 3568:) 3544:) 3534:}} 3528:{{ 3520:}} 3514:{{ 3506:) 3492:}} 3486:{{ 3478:) 3447:}} 3441:{{ 3419:) 3386:}} 3382:{{ 3366:) 3351:) 3327:) 3319:. 3308:) 3302:/ 3276:) 3272:• 3237:32 3198:) 3171:) 3093:." 3064:32 3046:, 3042:, 3038:, 3015:) 2996:) 2971:) 2963:? 2949:) 2939:}} 2933:{{ 2929:}} 2923:{{ 2921:, 2919:}} 2913:{{ 2870:) 2828:) 2787:) 2738:) 2709:) 2673:) 2642:) 2614:) 2500:) 2364:) 2330:) 2312:) 2293:) 2260:) 2226:) 2218:-- 2194:) 2169:) 2123:) 2070:) 2056:}} 2050:{{ 2046:}} 2040:{{ 2031:) 2012:) 1992:) 1943:) 1915:) 1869:) 1842:) 1822:, 1818:, 1814:, 1810:, 1776:) 1766:}} 1760:{{ 1746:) 1731:) 1716:) 1689:) 1664:) 1624:) 1600:) 1574:{{ 1572:! 1558:) 1543:) 1514:) 1495:| 1481:) 1454:| 1432:) 1414:) 1363:) 1339:) 1324:) 1305:) 1283:) 1222:) 1160:) 1108:) 1087:) 1073:) 1051:) 1047:• 1017:) 1003:{{ 999:}} 993:{{ 954:) 950:• 915:) 884:) 869:) 848:) 826:) 822:• 792:) 778:) 758:) 726:) 691:) 654:) 629:) 564:) 530:) 516:) 496:) 477:) 453:) 424:- 392:) 369:) 308:) 272:) 246:) 238:. 226:; 192:) 153:Go 149:. 141:to 119:) 68:← 3929:( 3862:( 3844:( 3824:( 3797:( 3717:( 3613:( 3599:( 3584:( 3564:( 3540:( 3502:( 3474:( 3432:) 3428:( 3415:( 3401:水 3398:‍ 3395:雲 3377:) 3373:( 3362:( 3347:( 3323:( 3294:( 3268:( 3194:( 3167:( 3084:, 3011:( 2992:( 2967:( 2945:( 2866:( 2855:. 2824:( 2783:( 2756:, 2734:( 2705:( 2669:( 2638:( 2628:, 2610:( 2496:( 2360:( 2326:( 2308:( 2289:( 2256:( 2241:♔ 2238:⚇ 2222:( 2190:( 2165:( 2152:‽ 2150:K 2148:r 2145:d 2142:n 2139:X 2119:( 2097:‽ 2095:K 2093:r 2090:d 2087:n 2084:X 2066:( 2027:( 2008:( 1988:( 1939:( 1911:( 1865:( 1838:( 1772:( 1742:( 1727:( 1712:( 1685:( 1660:( 1620:( 1596:( 1554:( 1539:( 1510:( 1477:( 1428:( 1410:( 1395:: 1390:. 1359:( 1335:( 1320:( 1301:( 1279:( 1218:( 1156:( 1104:( 1083:( 1069:( 1043:( 1013:( 946:( 911:( 900:. 880:( 865:( 844:( 818:( 788:( 774:( 754:( 722:( 687:( 650:( 625:( 587:水 584:‍ 581:雲 560:( 526:( 512:( 492:( 473:( 449:( 409:| 388:( 365:( 336:水 333:‍ 330:雲 304:( 268:( 242:( 188:( 169:! 115:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 107 - Knowledge

Index