Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 398

715:

themselves, but only a citation to the correct volume, page, or plate to guide readers should they wish to delve into the area's local history. I also advocate that a link might be provided, especially if the website in question provides completely unrestricted access. By "unrestricted" I mean not only free of charge, but also without the requirement of a local library card or other credential. Keep in mind, also, that the Baist and Sanborn maps are not just one-offs that are relevant to only Palms or even all of L.A.; rather they exist for communities nationwide. What is the question asked by local historians--both professional and amateur--when they begin to research a locale, whether it's in NYC, Goldfield NV, or Melonsquashville TN? That question is this: "Is there a Baist or Sanborn set for this neighborhood?". It's for this reason that I thought the inclusion of citations to these maps would be useful, and that the implementation of a standard citation style and template labels would be of value.

1727:. There is no such thing as "a user talk page regarding my company" - a User talk page is a page which any editor may use to communicate with that User. What I think you mean is that you want to create a Knowledge article about your company, in which case the advice given to Irene is relevant to you, as is the information already on your user talk page. One more point: it is forbidden to have a User name which suggests that you are editing for an organisation. I see that in fact you do not have this, but a personal user name. But if you continue to make your user name display as the company name, you are likely to get many editors annoyed with you, because it looks as if you are here purely for promotional purposes. Please don't do that again. -- 2347:. But I still disagree. I created my first article with my 24th edit, and it is still live (although I just went to look at it, and it needs improvement, it would not pass muster as a new article today). I agree that simply tossing someone at Knowledge and saying "Go, create a new article" is a recipe for frustration for both the student and several volunteers here, and will probably have no positive result. But with lots of preparation and a fair amount of hand holding, I think it can be done and done well. As I said I've seen it done (and helped) at edit-a-thons. But if the preparation and assistance are skimped or skipped, your students will probably hate you and surely hate Knowledge. So consider well. 209:

of an article must be cited to a reliable source — this includes description of Barton's apparently pleasant speaking voice, for example. I also suspect most if not all of the images you have added to the article will have to be removed, because the people or organizations which hold the copyrights to the images have not licensed them for use on Knowledge. Tempting as it might seem, you cannot simply use any image you find online. Finally, you will probably be expected to format your citations properly. But I wouldn't worry about learning citation format until we're sure there are any sources worth citing for the proposed article.

2366:, starting with my 16th edit, and have never had an article I started go on to be deleted. I have now created over 60 articles. So, it is possible for new editors to create articles successfully. However, I had been a published freelance writer for decades, and spent a few months studying how to write Knowledge articles before I started. It is possible for new editors to create new articles, but it is not at all easy. It takes complete dedication to complying with our policies and guidelines. 3047:. The answer is, probably, you can't. The very fact that you are talking about "a company page" makes me think that, like many people who come here, you misunderstand what Knowledge is. Knowledge is not an advertising medium, and may not be used for promotion of any kind. Every article should be based almost 100% on what people unconnected with the subject have published about it: Knowledge has almost no interest in what a company (or any other entity) wants to say about itself: it is 2497:! That's quite an ambitious project for an editor with 13 article-space edits, but that doesn't mean it can't be done. Your first step would probably be to acquire a much broader experience of editing here, and a good understanding of our policies and guidelines (which unfortunately are of almost Kafka-esque complexity) . After that, I personally would suggest that you ask your students to edit exclusively in draft space (the page name would be of the form 35: 3425:. You made about 47 edit attempts which were declined by bots. Many were identified as attempts to add external links containing your user name. That is inherently self-promotional. Do not do that any more. Others were identified as spam. Please do not spam Knowledge. Others were identified as possible vandalism. I will not call them that myself, but you should be careful to avoid editing patterns that look like vandalism. 2230:. Legitimacy is assured by following our policies and guidelines scrupulously. Please let your students know that they can ask questions here at the Teahouse any time. As for creating accounts, the sooner the better, and they should all try to make at less ten simple but useful edits over a period of four or more days, before getting into serious new article editing. This will give them 1787:

Many transformational leaders such as Marianne Williamson, Depak Chopra, and President Obama use this platform. Additionally, progressive and social changing organizations such as Occupy, the National Science Foundation and the Sierra Club have used their conferencing service. I think it is a loss to the world for this impressive company to not have a wiki page.

1065:? I took a look at the article templates there (very helpful for creating new articles, by the way) and didn't see any mention of authority control templates for individual works. On the other hand, the infobox included in the novel article template includes fields for both isbn and oclc number, which provide authority control in a way, for example: 619:

post-1910 maps for Palms are generally included with Culver City, even though it was L.A. that annexed Palms in 1914, not Culver City. With that in mind, shouldn't we have the option of adding this information to the Infobox for those articles where it's relevant? In the Infobox for Palms, it would be nice to add the following data points:

1783:

the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Knowledge's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies."

1951:

companies, it hasn't been around very long (4 years) and I could not find much from the news sources. Is there a simple way to make this acceptable? or should I give it a few years and maybe try again at a later time? Or is there a way to make it a stub and pass it on to someone else to flush out and improve?

2193:, and like the page says, "Student assignments can help improve Knowledge, but they can also cause the encyclopedia more harm than good when not directed properly." Preparation and awareness of what exactly Knowledge is and accepts for content are keys to having the project work and not blow up like a bomb. 3254:, just to clarify that deleting someone's user page won't get rid of their account. It's actually impossible to delete an account, because all edits need to be attributed to one. It's possible for an account to be blocked, but deleting an account's user page wouldn't mean the account had been deleted. 3055:

So, the way I would proceed is this. First, find places where people unconnected with the company have published substantial material about it (not just mentions, or entries in directories) and had them published in reliable places, such as major newspapers, or books from reputable publishers. Blogs,

1950:

I've put a fair amount of time in to make a small article on BillionGraves. It was rejected because it looks like advertising. I used a similar company Findagrave as a guide. Even though this company seems to be growing (about half the size of findagrave) and is making connections with several bigger

804:

Hello - I created a page yesterday - and got this message today: Hello, Davidevitt, and welcome to Knowledge! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Plus Architecture, may not conform to some of Knowledge's guidelines, and may not be

658:

says "When considering any aspect of infobox design, keep in mind the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article (an article should remain complete with its summary infobox ignored). The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that

358:

The article was not deleted and one of the admins involved said the redraft was an improvement. But the two admins involved in the review weren't interested enough in the subject to actually bring the nrew redraft live. I can't do it because I have a conflict of interest. This is such a waste of time

343:

3059:

If you cannot find such sources, give up - it will not be possible to write such an article at present. If you can, then Knowledge may have an article about the company (not a "company page"). If, as I suspect, you are connected with the company, you are discouraged from writing an article about it,

3051:

interested in what others have said about it. It follows that unless there is substantial published material about your company, written and published without any input from your company (so that excludes interviews and pieces based on press releases), it will be impossible at present for anybody to

2473:

My suggestion would be to get the students to click on "Random article", fifth item in the menu at the left of this page. They will find some well-written articles, with no obvious need for improvement; many articles on subjects that do not interest them; and some articles on subjects that have some

2325:

TRPoD and DES have given you good, and officially approved, advice. I will be more blunt. I think the idea of encouraging people who have never edited Knowledge before to start by trying to create articles is crazy. Creating a new article is really difficult, compared to routine work like correcting

1782:

The reason it was rejected: "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by

1620:

I just read the MIT report about the "Decline of Knowledge". My negative experience as a newcomer was that an article writer is bandied about by various intransigent editors with various agendas and biases. This experience confirmed the truth of the MIT report. I do not find anywhere in Knowledge on

697:. There is a cost, both in implementation and in maintenance, to a change to a template, and it is higher for a widely used template, so an argument needs to be made that the benefits are worth while, and then someone with the needed skill has to be found who is willing to make and test the changes. 618:

The catch is, in the case of large cities the Sanborn and Baist sets comprise many hundreds of pages, and in the case of Sanborn across multiple sets for different years. It has taken me many weeks to find the right Sanborn and Baist pages for the Palms district of L.A., largely due to the fact the

208:

You may have an uphill battle with this article if offline sources about Barton are as scanty as online ones seem to be. But I would be remiss if I let you think notability is the only issue with the article; it also has some tone issues, not being neutral enough in places. Any praise of the subject

2586:

Hello, I created an article yesterday and there's a few things I've tried to do that I think need double checking, I found some images on flickr.com (with OS licence) and added them to wikimedia commons and then created the page. Anywho, could you kindly check and give me some future tips about how

1973:

have reliable sources (an article about the company in the New York Times would be seen as a reliable source, a blog post on it would not?. You can put a sandbox draft up for review and get it checked out by others before you launch it to public space, if you choose to go that route. Happy editing.

761:

My thinking was that if a standard citing format were to be used, it would be a good candidate for inclusion in the Infobox, but only if someone comes along and decides to insert the information--IOW if someone wanted to add this optional information, then this is where it should go. However, the

614:

maps are provided free to cardholders by many public library systems, at least for the state where the library is located. The David Rumsey collection of online maps is free to access, including the Baist real estate survey maps. Together, the Baist and Sanborn maps offer a remarkable window into

388:

of the article, your edits are now in there. Your sandbox is accordingly deleted, and is now clean for you to use for another purpose – though you don't ever need to use "User:BC1278/sandbox". It's actually cleaner to use a dedicated sandbox for each article you are working on. For example, here it

1786:

My reason for writing the article: There is no wiki page about this company. There are other wiki pages about companies that have similar offerings -for example, WebEx, Zoom and GoToMeeting. As a user of MaestroConference they are AMAZING! The company has a heart and is committed to social good.

237:

Expanding on GF's point, you can't refer to unpublished material. So, for example, say you have a scanned copy of his degree certificate. You can't upload that and refer to it, as you're not a reliable source. But neither can you refer to it in an offline cite, as, although it exists, it's not

3205:

account was just created 9 months ago. So, the two accounts were never used at the same time. It is quite permissible for an editor to stop using one account (completely) and then create a new account later and use the new account. Sockpuppet cases are when an editor has multiple accounts and is

2527:. Many of the mistakes new users make show up here in the form of people asking why their edit was reverted, or their draft rejected, or their article nominated for deletion. Perusing the Teahouse archives isn't a substitute for the reading suggested above, but I would at the very least make it 1455:

Roland Berger has recenetly rebranded its business. Therefore, there are many deviations in the Knowledge articles as they still contain the old firm name/ logo etc. I already proposed changes on each "Talk" page of the relevant Knowledge articles. The english articles were alreay edited. Could

3087:

It is not easy creating an article in Knowledge. It is much harder if you have a conflict of interest. And it is almost impossible if you come with an intention to promote or advertise. My recommendation would be that if you wish to contribute to Knowledge, you find other subjects to work on.

2418:

True, but there are lots and lots of notable and perfectly accessible topics left. Also it might be good to teach purely descriptive writing that is not also argumentative, but this difference would need to be made clear to students (and to the instructor, perhaps) before the start of any such

1968:

The best thing to do is probably just let it go for a couple of years until your subject becomes more notable, if it does. Or you could write the article in your sandbox and work on perfecting it for a while before you launch it to public space. Remember, articles are supposed to be neutral in

2047:

BTW I don't represent the company, I simply noticed that findagrave had a page but billiongraves did not. Thought this might be a good opportunity to move from editing to creating. I see now that it isn't about 2 companies or people or things being equally popular, but notable in reliable and

2474:

interest for them and an obvious need for improvement. Even if all they can do is correct a typo or grammatical error, that will be an improvement and they can then move on to another random article. If they try to create new articles, it is likely that they will come up against Knowledge's

714:

I've probably done a bad job of expressing my idea. As with most geographic infoboxes, the two maps here show (1) the boundaries of Palms and (2) its location within L.A. The utility of historical maps is quite different. In the first place, I don't advocate adding a picture of the maps

2749:

Hi Vchimpanzee , aww okay I was using imdb as I saw a similar biography article. I think the other wiki editors must have been reading these tea rooms as some have helped out but they're kind of adding and deleting each others content, could you please tell me what the right thing to do

3166:

I currently have internet access difficulties and haven't taken the (significant) trouble to look up the proper reference for the restriction on multiple accounts, or I would've cited it. If I am right, can someone please expedite this? If I'm wrong, please tell me in what way.

1105:. The thing that puzzles me is whether (and how) those templates get added when the documentation for the templates explicitly limits their scope to "people". I haven't yet asked at the Reference Desk, but I think that will be my next stop. Thanks again for the suggestions. 2279:

for some very good suggestions, and that you consider registering your course with the education project promptly. (This is not required at all, but is IMO a good idea.) I would also advise that you encourage your students to register accounts asap, and suggest that they take

1922:

Please don't be discouraged from contributing here – we have almost five million articles, and many of them need improvement. Your contributions to almost all of them are welcome – but please avoid those about companies with which you have a professional relationship. Regards,

2478:

requirements, the article will get rejected, and they will feel aggrieved. (I wonder if there are statistics for what proportion of first articles by registered users end up getting accepted? I doubt that my first article would be accepted now, standards were lower then.)

2288:. A course page is a very good idea, and students might want to link to it on their user pages or mention it on the talk page of the articles they edit. If they are going to be creating new articles, I strongly urge that they create them in Draft space, possibly with the 421:

Hi guys. Say I'm editing an article with a big list of awards with 20 items, minimal text (just a person's name). There's one a year, and at the moment it's just a tall, skinny list within its own section. Is it possible to force it into columns, a la reflist|3? So:

609:

In the past few years, the availability of detailed historic maps online has been increasing rapidly. Materials once accessible only in the largest university and public libraries, and in person, are now free to research online, or require only a library card. The

954:

Please don't be discouraged from contributing here – we have almost five million articles, and many of them need improvement. But please refrain from editing the Plus Architecture article directly; you are always welcome to propose changes on the article talk page,

2501:) where their work would have a better chance of survival than in mainspace; and that you impress on them again and again and again that they may not violate copyrights or personal privacy. As for topics, I suggest you ask them to choose a red-linked entry at 3001:. "A common misconception ... is that ... " is itself a claim, and should never appear in any Knowledge article without a reference to a reliable source stating not only that it is a misconcpetion, but that it is a common misconception. As it stands, it is 2296:

the student starts the actual article. Article creation is one of the tougher tasks for new editors, but I ahve participated in Editathons where brand new editors were able to create acceptable articles in a single full-day session, so it can be done.

2025:- we call this criterion 'notability', but it's a somewhat unfortunate name, because people often mistake it for some of the qualities I listed. Knowledge has almost no interest in what a company says about itself, or how it want to be presented. -- 2218:. If you go about this the right way, it can be a very good thing. The Wikimedia Foundation has various tools and resources available to support teachers and professors who incorporate writing Knowledge articles into their classes. Please read 3301:

I am trying to add information to the General table for the following page; however, I keep getting error messages about too many external links (I am only including two links, just like the other entries) and am unable to save the page.

2952:, and welcome to the Teahouse. It looks to me like the clause "something must be given up, or traded off, in order to obtain it" is incorrect. I would replace that with "it must simply not be commonly available" or words to that effect. — 2662:

since in many cases anyone can add content, just like here. For anything you got from imdb, you should be able to find another more reliable source that provides the same information. Otherwise you probably can't use the information.—

238:

been published in a manner that would be verifiable by others. If, however, that certificate had been reproduced in a book that you've got, you can refer to the page number as, even if hard, it's then possible for others to verify.

1301:

Maybe we're interpreting the "proper attribution" differently in the statement "Proper attribution to the author or source of a work, even if it is in the public domain, is still required in order to comply with relevant policies",

1096:

Thank you for the suggestions. As things stand right now, some individual works have authority control, others do not. But the question seems to go further than just anything within the scope of WikiProject Novels. For example,

659:

purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance." The takeaway is that only "key facts" should be included. A current map and the ZIP code seem to be key facts, but I doubt whether links to historic maps are truly key.

1171:. In order to help you further, we would need to know who created the image and whether that person (or persons) gave permission for it to be used on Knowledge. Knowing which article you want to add the image to would also help. — 1912:

state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is

879:, which was in fact deleted. The current version is not currently tagged for deletion. In general, copying text from other websites is not allowed, unless it is a quotation, marked as such, attributed to its author, and properly 680:, I agree with Cullen's comments above. Note that there is no reason why the page numbers for these maps couldn't be included in an appropriate section of the article body, and perhaps links to them in the External links section. 883:. Knowledge is very strict on copyright infringement. Also, making a page about a person or company (or any of a few other categories) without indicating why that person is significant can get the page deleted promptly. See 1284: 1153:

Adding an image to a Knowledge article is not too complicated. The image needs to be uploaded, and there is an Upload Wizard to help with that. Or, if the image is already used in another Knowledge article or is hosted at

2559:

and find their article assessment grid. In this case it is midway down on the right. Finding a topic rated Top or Important or Mid that is Stub Class could be a basis for directing efforts to needed improvement areas. --

2531:

reading for your students. Being familiar with how the Teahouse works before they need to ask their own questions would also be helpful. Thanks for your interest in improving Knowledge, and good luck with your project.

2926:

A common misconception on scarcity is that an item has to be important for it to be scarce, or vice versa. This is not true; for something to be scarce, something must be given up, or traded off, in order to obtain

2889:

Yeah thanks guys, it doesn't really matter now anyway as my article has been marked for deletion, so I got something wrong. If there's anything any of you guys can add please help me at least incubate my first go:

139:, and welcome to the Teahouse. Scanned material should almost never be uploaded to Knowledge, nor should scans usually be linked to from Knowledge, because that would violate the copyright of the material scanned. 981:

Hello, folks. Should we be adding Authority Control templates to individual works of fiction? If so, is the authority data the same as that of the work's author? Thank you for any help that you can provide.

401:, depending on whether you wanted to create it in your user or user talk space. Usually, if there's any shuffling of edits that will result from a history merge, I refrain, but it was minor here. Best regards-- 1841:

For the first step, you should remove any phrase that would drop from a marketer's tongue, like " the market leader", "much more engaging ", "and inspire one another to action and change" . We present content

844:: these are internal links to other articles, which can be added like ]. Anyway, thank you for your contributions, you have done a great job so far. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions. Thanks, -- 2326:

spelling, improving grammar, restructuring messy paragraphs, and adding citations. I had registered an account and made around 1,800 edits before I felt capable of creating a new article. Please reconsider.

1704:

Hi Irene we are RMOS Consultancy and facing with the same problem. every time i am trying to create a user talk page regarding my company RMOS Consultancy, it gets rejected so feeling helpless kindly help ?

1432:(which mean I would want to look further to see that nothing else is). I don't have time to address this right now. Please remove every single part of the content that was not written in your own words.-- 1310:

material in an aricle came from a specified public domain source, and a single catchall notice at the bottom of the page doesn't accomplish that. If Knowledge policy really does unequivocally state that

1219:

be good enough? Some of the passages have inappropriate tone and need to be rewritten anyway, but I think some large chunks can probably be left, if I can figure out how to attribute them properly. —

3186:, and welcome to the Teahouse. If you suspect an editor is using more than one account, and it is not a legitimate alternative account which is publicly acknowledged, you should file a complaint at 2641:

hello and welcome to The Teahouse. I suspect anything you got from flickr.com is not suitable for Wikimedia Commons, and if I am correct the photos will be removed for not having the proper license.

2447:

For example, I have a student who is writing about healthy eating and a spice reference might just has a stub. An article in this case might be ten to twelve sentences, judging by the other pages.

2859:. I suspected that at least some of the images might have a problem. What I meant to say was that many flickr images wouldn't qualify, but some would. My wording didn't really communicate that.— 1994:

Thanks for the advice. I wasn't trying to promote the company so much as demonstrate it's relevant enough to merit a wikipedia page. I'll give it a year or 2 and continue to poke away at it.

808:

I think it might have been because I copied some text from a website that stated that Plus Architecture was award winning without referencing those awards specifically. Is that the case?

142:

That said, material which is not online can absolutely be used as a reference for a Knowledge article. Newspaper articles, magazine articles and books are all good sources; they may have

1643:

However if you wish to disappear, the simplest method is to just stop editing and leave your account alone. If you wish to take things a step further, then there exists a process called

1283:

incorporate content from a non-neutral source from over a century ago is a different question, of course; but I don't see an attribution problem here. If there is one, it affects about

1017:, which is staffed in part by people who are librarians "in the real world" and might be familiar with authority control from that angle. Sorry I can't offer a more helpful response. — 1640:. I'm sorry you feel that way. That particular report is a few years old, and this very Teahouse was created in response to such issues. I would hope we could persuade you to stay. 212:

Sorry if this is discouraging. I have seen many articles fail AfC review multiple times (as yours has) yet still go on to be accepted as articles, though, so don't lose heart. —

1884:

says, you appear to have the wrong idea about the purpose of Knowledge: it is not an advertising platform. You seem to be here to promote one of your clients, and Knowledge

628:

Assuming it doesn't violate Knowledge policy or intellectual property rights, I'd also want to provide URLs here. In general I think this would be desirable as a standard.

2450:

Some of these students are more talented than others, so I wanted to keep the expectations simple. Even filling in a stub requires thoughtful, competent work to be worthy.

1265:? What I see is "Proper attribution to the author or source of a work, even if it is in the public domain, is still required in order to comply with relevant policies". At 347:

The Conflict if interest page lists the Teahouse as one forum where editors with a conflict can reach out. I wonder if someone might like to take a look? Many thanks Hi,

294:. And the scanned documents would be copyright materials which you would not be allowed to upload to the Wikimedia commons and most likely not be able to provide a valid 1210:. There is a note mentioning that some content in the article comes from that work at the bottom of the article, but there is no attribution in the body of the article. 1001:, and welcome back to the Teahouse. I'm sorry no one answered your question sooner; I suspect that, like me, other volunteers didn't know the answer. I have now read 362:

The Conflict if interest page lists the Teahouse as one forum where editors with a conflict can reach out. I wonder if someone might like to take a look? Many thanks

1214:

says that a notice without text attribution in the body is insufficient, but I'm not sure how to format attribution on very long passages — would "According to the

2312:

If you want, I would be happy to work with you in such a project. I'm already an approved volunteer with the Education project. Let me know if you are interested.

2093:

the references for that article are mostly independent, from what I can tell. It's not a great article because it's mostly lists, but its references are better.—

840:: these are needed to improve navigability of the encyclopedia, and can be added by writing ] at the bottom of the article. The article also did not contain many 836:: and welcome to the Teahouse. The article's referencing appears to all be in order. There were several other minor problems with it: it hadn't been added to any 1661:

are never deleted as they are required for attribution - but as LukeSurl stated, the account name can be scrambled and you can choose never to log in again. --

2444:

Let me be more specific about my expectations. I was thinking about filling in some stubs, nothing big, nothing requiring a structured article of any length.

2021:, the criterion for inclusion in Knowledge isn't relevance, or size, or turnover, or importance, or fame, or influence, or popularity. It is solely whether 1888:. Please advise the company to wait until someone not connected with it thinks it is interesting and important enough to have an article here. Please read: 3488:

It is not my intention to be posting spam. I am just trying to get the information for the company I work for posted, and I've never used this tool before.

2933:

I think something is wrong with this, but I don't know how to express what exactly is wrong and how to fix it. Could anyone help me with this? Thanks.

2809:

But I just followed the W icon at the top of each image page, the commons is a bit different and I'm not really sure how to align everything just yet.

2400:

Also to consider is the fact that most classes a stress as feature of good writing the promotion of your thesis statement but that type of writing is

1586: 2386:

Giving an assignment to "create" an article when the 5 million most easy topics have already been created might be something to consider as well. --

936:. Please wait until someone not connected with the company thinks it is interesting and important enough to have an article here. Also, please read: 2419:

course. But the Education project has had many successful courses to date, and quite a few of them did involve article creation. So it can be done.

2272: 1244: 654:

already has two maps. It is difficult for me to see how links to historical maps belong in an infobox. Please keep in mind that the section of the

98: 90: 85: 73: 68: 63: 3139:

I think this user was probably in good faith, but there are user pages for both names; "10redmoe" is on all or almost all of their contributions.

875:, and welcome to the Teahouse. That notice was actually placed yesterday (as you can see from the signature) and referred to the first version of 3329:? Any link you add must provide substantial information about the topic of the article that for some reason cannot be included in the article.— 1905: 1550: 947: 3403:

I'm not going to examine the edits and comment but will just note that the attempted edits can be seen by clicking "filter log" at the top of

2219: 1954:

It took me about a day to research and put this article together. I'm sure most of you are much much faster, but I'm slowly learning. Thanks

1315:

that's needed to attribute any amount of public domain text in an article is the single simple notice at the bottom of the page, I'm curious

3305: 2961: 2556: 2541: 1596: 1335: 1228: 1180: 1026: 523: 221: 155: 2023:

people unconnected of the subject have written enough material about it, published in reliable places, to provide the basis for an article

1513:

And,obviously, if they know enough about what they are editing and if they have a parent's permition. It does say Knowledge is a 💕 which

114:

Are only links to webpages viewed as a good reference or is there some other form that is acceptable (ie. photographs, scanned material)?

3231:

It is quite permissible for an editor to stop using one account (completely) and then create a new account later and use the new account.

2979:

Hello, GrammarFascist. Thanks for reply. I actually wanted to say that statements like "this is not true" were not common for Knowledge.

1067: 3342: 2872: 2676: 2622: 2605:

Not all of your images were free. I have tagged them for deletion. I also changed the license tag from the public domain files to {{

2285: 2106: 1757: 1072: 1013:(and maybe look at its Talk page too) in hopes of finding a user who might be able to give you a better answer. You might also try 181:. These are useful for substantiating individual facts, such as Barton having interviewed Phyllis Diller, but cannot establish his 2984: 2938: 2777:, but that you added images to it in the wrong way. Rather than adding links to the files to that page, you need to add the text 694: 300:

secondary sources where knowledgeable authors, scholars, reporters have analysed materials and presented conclusions and analysis

693:. However large infobnoxes can be comples and tricky to edit. New features would normally be proposed on the talk page, such as 683:

As to your nominal question, new fields are edited by editing the template page (and its documentation page, normally), such as

3060:

because you are likely to find it hard to write in a sufficiently neutral way: better to request somebody else to write it, as

2510: 2281: 1928: 1292: 964: 631:

I've noticed that there are already previously defined attributes like postal_code_type and postal_code. How are those set up?

146:

copies online, in which case they're fine to link to, but such sources can be cited even if no legitimate online copy exists. —

1040:

Thank you for your response. I, too, found those documents ambiguous. I'll try one of your recommendations. Thanks again.

3065: 1898: 940: 2453:

Given that, would Maproom, Cullen328 or DES suggest that editing existing entries for grammatical errors be a better goal?

622:

Baist Map page(s): 1921 Baist Real Estate Survey Atlas, plate 38 (recto) Sanborn Map page(s): Palms, California (1910)

3404: 3371:

I do not see that others have added additional information. Am I required to do this, and if so, where or how? Thank you.

2276: 2190: 767: 733:: Why do you think that this information belongs in the infobox in particular, as opposed to another part of the article? 720: 636: 1009:, and I could not find an unambiguous answer to your question. My best advice would be to go through the page history of 606:

I'm asking this question mainly in regard to articles about urban districts or other neighborhoods in the larger cities.

3536: 3077: 3061: 3033: 2502: 1981: 1798: 1644: 1428:

of the topic. I was going to explain that further but then I discovered that the entire release history appears to be a

1062: 21: 615:

the history of a city, with innumerable clues about the character of neighborhoods 80, 100, or more years in the past.

3119: 3002: 2718: 2043:

I didn't know that. I'll finish the training and try to create a different article that is more notable in the future.

1479: 1010: 1002: 687: 252:

But if his PhD thesis is available in a university library it can be cited, because it is accessible to other people.

2774: 1490: 2292:. You or an experienced editor or both should review the available sources that a student has gathered on the topic 3005:, and is more suited to a textbook than an encyclopaedia. I've simply removed the two sentences from the article.-- 2618: 2506: 1924: 1303: 1288: 960: 850: 42: 3467: 2998: 2980: 2949: 2934: 2561: 2405: 2387: 2197: 1863: 1828: 1662: 1576: 1522: 1437: 1397: 501: 406: 307: 3539:, about two sections up from this discussion. Most of the answers there are relevant to your inquiry as well. -- 3511: 3394: 3259: 3081: 2968: 2846: 2832: 2786: 2734: 2702: 2548: 1600: 1382: 1368: 1342: 1235: 1187: 1110: 1045: 1033: 1014: 987: 530: 228: 162: 2891: 763: 730: 716: 677: 647: 632: 170: 3044: 3029: 1877: 1811: 1794: 1975: 1475: 2132: 2081: 2053: 2006: 1959: 1881: 1713: 1626: 1429: 1098: 1006: 956: 790: 187:... and without proof of notability, no subject can have a Knowledge article. This policy is summed up in 2189:

Hello and and thanks for your interest. We have some guidance for people who want to help in this manner

355: 340: 3412: 3336: 2902: 2866: 2814: 2758: 2670: 2614: 2595: 2231: 2100: 1751: 1558: 1546:

So, if a kid is capable of citing books (or just wants to fix grammar and spelling problems), then cool.

1425: 1206: 845: 572: 3389:? (If you get the same error message when trying to post them here, just describe them to us instead). 3025:

Hi can you guide me how i can create a company page on wikipedia. One of my page is gone for deletion:

2153:

Following the guidelines, of course, I wanted them to write a short article for non-addressed topics.

1724: 1709: 2655: 2519:

If I might add one more suggestion to the excellent advice my Teahouse colleagues have already given,

2128: 2090: 2077: 2049: 2018: 2002: 1955: 2693:. There are plenty of photos on there with compatible licences (although there are some issues). See 1892: 1637: 1622: 1592: 1572: 1518: 1433: 925: 911: 907: 872: 837: 833: 822: 818: 402: 3548: 3515: 3507: 3497: 3475: 3438: 3431: 3416: 3398: 3390: 3380: 3364: 3348: 3316: 3284: 3270: 3263: 3255: 3245: 3217: 3176: 3097: 3093: 3037: 3014: 3010: 2988: 2970: 2953: 2942: 2906: 2878: 2856: 2850: 2842: 2836: 2828: 2818: 2790: 2782: 2762: 2738: 2730: 2706: 2698: 2682: 2626: 2599: 2569: 2550: 2533: 2520: 2514: 2494: 2488: 2467: 2459: 2425: 2413: 2395: 2379: 2372: 2353: 2344: 2335: 2318: 2303: 2268: 2247: 2240: 2215: 2205: 2184: 2176: 2168: 2136: 2112: 2085: 2066: 2057: 2034: 2030: 2010: 1987: 1963: 1932: 1871: 1855: 1836: 1824: 1802: 1763: 1736: 1732: 1717: 1696: 1692: 1670: 1651: 1630: 1604: 1585:

While there's no Knowledge policy on children editing if the child is under 13 and from the US the

1580: 1562: 1526: 1502: 1483: 1441: 1421: 1413: 1405: 1386: 1378: 1372: 1364: 1344: 1327: 1296: 1262: 1256: 1237: 1220: 1189: 1172: 1140: 1114: 1106: 1084: 1056: 1049: 1041: 1035: 1018: 998: 991: 983: 968: 915: 897: 855: 841: 826: 794: 771: 746: 739: 724: 703: 672: 665: 640: 595: 591: 576: 548: 544: 532: 515: 509: 443: 439: 410: 371: 315: 282: 261: 247: 243: 230: 213: 164: 147: 129: 3530: 3489: 3422: 3386: 3372: 3356: 3322: 3308: 1456:

anyone be so kind and assist me with the implementations of the changes for the German articles? (

274: 174: 136: 121: 3445: 3147: 3109: 2633: 2606: 2463: 2423: 2351: 2316: 2301: 2262: 2172: 1147: 1132: 895: 866: 701: 651: 257: 51: 17: 3306:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Comparison_of_research_networking_tools_and_research_profiling_systems

1819:

You seem to have the wrong idea about what Knowledge's purpose is. We are an encyclopedia that

292:

reliably published sources with a reputation of fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight

3493: 3376: 3360: 3312: 2484: 2331: 1498: 1273: 1252: 1155: 1080: 929: 876: 786: 385: 278: 125: 3236:

Oh man, I was quite unaware of that! I owe the user an apology. Thanks for explaining. :-( --

2555:

For what you are suggesting, a method might be for the student to find a WikiProject such as

814:

in the meantime I've removed that text from the page. Does everything else I've done comply?

359:

and work and leaves the article, which isn't very strong, in the same weak state as before.

354:

was proposed for deletion, I created a re-draft with a bunch of new sources and information.

344:

and work and leaves the article, which isn't very strong, in the same weak state as before.

339:

was proposed for deletion, I created a re-draft with a bunch of new sources and information.

3544: 3408: 3355:

I am attempting to add an entry to the table with two external links, as others have done.

3330: 3280: 3241: 3202: 3172: 3143: 2898: 2860: 2810: 2754: 2714: 2690: 2664: 2638: 2610: 2591: 2227: 2094: 1745: 1568: 1554: 1266: 1201: 1136: 568: 367: 3506:

Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not an advertising board, so this isn't the tool you need. -

2694: 1909: 1885: 1859: 933: 762:

References and External Links sections can work just as well; I didn't think of it before

3459: 3426: 3089: 3073: 3006: 2367: 2235: 2026: 2022: 1843: 1728: 1688: 1537: 888: 880: 734: 660: 587: 554: 540: 435: 299: 295: 239: 2456:

Please advise. I make all these suggestions with great respect for all that y'all do.

500:

You can pipe a parameter in the opening to say how many columns. (and use bullets) --

3463: 3206:

using them simultaneously. So, in this case, filing an SPI complaint is unwarranted.

3198: 3187: 3123: 3115: 3064:. But if you decided to go ahead, you need to read about our policy and practices on 2420: 2348: 2313: 2298: 2289: 2223: 1687:

Subheading added by Colin Fine, because this is another question from another editor.

1648: 1533: 1417: 892: 884: 698: 384:

Nice job on that rewrite. I've done a history merge, meaning that if you look at the

253: 1543:. I think we also discourage anyone under 18 from posting any personal information. 887:. Additional independent reliable sources, perhaps supporting expanded relevant and 3326: 2659: 2480: 2401: 2363: 2340: 2327: 2069:

also fail in this regard? It seems to have mostly internal company references also.

1851: 1847: 1821:

presents content that third party reliable sources have found worthy of discussing.

1820: 1741: 1540: 1494: 1323: 1248: 1211: 1091: 1076: 303: 291: 197: 188: 2801:

Hi Cordless Larry, I'm not sure how to make it appear for media in category like:

1998:

In the meantime I'm taking the training thing to help better understand NPOV etc.

1880:! I'm afraid that it is unlikely that you will be able to create that article. As 1776:

How can I edit my first article so it will get accepted? Here are the specifics:

811:

If so I will do a bit more research into finding out what what awards they were.

3540: 3276: 3251: 3237: 3194: 3183: 3168: 3151: 2475: 655: 379: 363: 351: 336: 325: 183: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3455: 1461: 1158:, it does not need to be reuploaded to put it in an article. There's just some 1393: 1159: 1102: 928:! It appears that you may have a close personal or professional connection to 602:

How can we propose new infobox fields/templates, and how are they implemented?

2587:

to add pictures to/from the commons etc to biographical articles. Thank You!

2498: 1363:

and let me know if it contains any mistakes which influence on its approval?

177:, all but one of the sources currently cited in your draft are what we call 3155: 3133: 3466:. The filter is designed specifically to stop people from doing that. -- 3224: 3207: 2917: 2892:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joshua_Ferdinand

2802: 2149:

I want my university electronic writing students to create an entry . . .

3325:

hello and welcome to The Teahouse. Do any of the external links violate

1489:

I am afraid we cannot help you with the German Knowledge. Please ask at

449:

Hi Bromley, the easiest is probably with {{div col}} and {{div col end}}

611: 1860:

professional critics who have made them, both AMAZING! and SUCKS EGGS!

107:

What qualifies as a good reference when trying to back up a statement?

1326:. I'm going to replace the template I had added with one of those. — 1200:

Hello, Teahouse, and welcome to my question. I noticed that much of

2588: 3162:

Decline speedy delete, not a valid speedy deletion criterion. (TW)

1969:

tone--you can't write like you're promoting that company, and you

3110:

User_talk:10redmoe#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_User:LindseyH140

2651: 1396:

your draft article and not the existing disambiguation page. --

1360: 1162:

you'll need to use to position an image in an article correctly.

304:

Knowledge editors developing theories, premises, or conclusions.

270:

I have some published brochures which I had planned on scanning.

3201:

has only 23 edits and last edited 2 years and 1 month ago. The

3068:; and if you are employed or otherwise paid by the company you 1465: 169:

To give you a bit more insight into what you need to do before

3136:

the latter from the page while fixing the alphabetization.

1790:

Can you please help me make the changes needed to my article?

1204:

appeared to have been copied from a public domain source, the

29: 3056:

wikis, and social media are not usually regarded as reliable.

2525:

have your students read questions and answers at the Teahouse

1306:. It seems to me that it would be helpful to readers to know 1169:

most images found on the internet cannot be used on Knowledge

932:. You seem to be here to promote your company, and Knowledge 2271:, and welcome to the Teahouse. I would advise that you read 560:{{columns-list|3| enter list items here on separate lines }} 1462:

https://de.wikipedia.org/Roland_Berger_Strategy_Consultants

2226:

as recommended reading for your students, followed by the

1917:

to disclose that fact; it is an obligation, not an option.

1457: 583: 3026: 2440:

All sides of this question are measured and informative.

1319:

it was decided that was sufficient. Thanks for replying.

3451: 3156:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/684792764

298:-use claim for uploading to Knowledge. Knowledge wants 290:"Brochures" are almost certainly not going to count as 3076:. If you still want to go ahead, I advise you to read 1825:

to provide a promotional platform for AMAZING! things.

2803:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/Category:Michael_Shanks

2162:

3) What would be your concerns to ensure legitimacy?

1448:

Update of German Knowledge articles on Roland Berger

1279:

template at the foot of the page. Whether Knowledge

2823:Just edit each of the image pages and add the text 2729:with the text you want to appear under the image). 2159:2) How far out should they become logged-in users? 1779:The rejected article is titled: MaestroConference 3452:you seem to be very serious about trying to enter 3190:, not place a speedy deletion tag on a user page. 2582:Please check my wiki & commons contributions 3450:And to be a little more blunt than PrimeHunter 2717:, you'll find instructions how to embed images 3148:User talk:10redmoe#Knowledge:Typo Team/Members 3052:write an acceptable article about the company. 431:2015 2013 2011 2014 2012 2010 2713:Once you've got the copyright issues sorted, 8: 3021:how i can create a company page on wikipedia 2402:absolutely contrary to any Knowledge writing 2065:Just out of curiosity, would the article on 1621:how to cancel/delete my account. Lorzendel2 567:instead of a set number of columns. Cheers! 3193:But this is not a typical sockpuppet case, 2505:, in an area that interests them. Regards, 1466:https://de.wikipedia.org/Burkhard_Schwenker 1416:. The draft is very light on citations to 514:nowikied TRPoD's div col tags for clarity — 3535:See for example, on this Teahouse page, § 3385:What are the links you are trying to add, 1590: 2589:https://en.wikipedia.org/Joshua_Ferdinand 1844:in a dispassionate, neutral point of view 1218:," followed by use of <blockquote: --> 891:content, would further help the article. 782:I was able to upload properly. Thank you. 3297:Error message when trying to add content 3072:disclose this according to the rules in 2273:Knowledge:School and university projects 2048:published sources. Thanks for the info. 1772:Help with first article getting accepted 1587:Children's Online Privacy Protection Act 1245:Category:Catholic Encyclopedia templates 1071:. It might be a good question to ask at 3146:for speedy deletion, leaving a note at 117:Site in production: John Donald Barton 3462:to promote a Website where you have a 2773:One more thing. I noticed you created 1551:Knowledge:Guidance for younger editors 1458:https://de.wikipedia.org/Roland_Berger 1269:, that attribution is provided by the 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3275:OH well, live & learn. Thanks. -- 2220:Knowledge:Education program/Educators 1946:How can I make my article acceptable? 1908:; specifically, please note that our 1359:Hi! Could you please check this page 191:: every article must be supported by 7: 2557:Knowledge:WikiProject Food and drink 1886:does not allow promotion of any kind 1793:THANK YOU!!! Gina Maria Mele, M.S. 934:does not allow promotion of any kind 906:Okay great - thanks for the advice. 2156:1) What do you think of this idea? 1901:guidelines; and, most particularly, 1131:i wamted to a picture and more info 1101:has authority control, and so does 1068:The Sacred and Profane Love Machine 328:after article for deletion resolved 3537:how i can create a company page... 2841:You seem to have mastered it now. 1532:Mostly yes. Anyone can edit, but 1167:However, you should be aware that 625:Culver City (1924 p22 , 1929 p22) 28: 3027:https://en.wikipedia.org/Bizporto 2997:It's more fundamental than that, 2775:Commons:Category:Joshua Ferdinand 2689:That's not correct about Flickr, 2286:Knowledge:The Knowledge Adventure 2127:OK. I think I understand. Thanks. 1549:More information can be found at 1261:Hmm, where are you reading that, 1073:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Novels 1534:they do not add what they "know" 1471:Thank you very much in advance. 695:Template talk:Infobox settlement 650:. I notice that the infobox for 434:Or something similar. Cheers, 33: 2282:Knowledge:Training/For students 1474:Kind regards, Franziska Poszler 1196:Attributing public domain text 1150:, and welcome to the Teahouse. 563:You can also use a width like: 425:2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 205:of the subject of the article. 1: 3405:Special:Contributions/DATA180 2277:Knowledge:Student assignments 2191:Knowledge:Student assignments 1848:reliably published sources do 1509:Are children allowed to edit? 1392:I think you meant to link to 3549:15:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3516:00:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3498:00:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3476:00:18, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3458:, which probably equates to 3439:00:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3285:15:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3264:14:52, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3246:14:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3098:11:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3038:08:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 3015:11:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 2907:00:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC) 2781:to each of the image pages. 2503:Knowledge:Requested articles 2362:I created my first article, 1906:paid-contribution disclosure 1816:and welcome to the Teahouse! 1645:Knowledge:Courtesy vanishing 1536:, they merely summarize and 1063:Knowledge:WikiProject Novels 948:paid-contribution disclosure 656:Manual of style on infoboxes 3456:that matches your user name 3417:21:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 3399:20:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 3381:19:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 3365:19:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 3349:19:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 3317:18:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 3218:21:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 3177:17:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 3120:Knowledge:Typo Team/Members 2989:13:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2971:12:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2943:08:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2912:How to fix article Scarcity 2879:19:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2851:19:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2837:19:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2819:19:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2791:19:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2763:19:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2739:18:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2707:19:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2683:18:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2658:. Imdb is not considered a 2654:as a source in the article 2627:18:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2600:17:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2570:23:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2551:20:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2515:13:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2489:08:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2468:05:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2426:23:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2414:23:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2396:23:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2380:05:07, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2354:22:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2336:21:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2319:21:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2304:21:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2248:21:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2206:21:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2177:20:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2137:22:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2113:20:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 2086:01:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 2058:18:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 2035:16:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 2011:16:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 1988:16:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 1964:15:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 1933:21:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1872:17:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1837:17:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1803:17:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1764:21:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1737:11:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 1718:04:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 1697:11:23, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 1671:17:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1652:16:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1631:16:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1605:16:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1581:17:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 1563:14:45, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 1527:14:19, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 1503:15:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1484:14:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1442:13:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1406:13:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1387:13:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1373:13:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1345:13:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1297:13:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1257:13:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1243:Do any of the templates at 1238:12:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1190:13:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1141:12:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1115:13:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 1085:12:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 1050:18:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 1036:11:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 1011:Knowledge:Authority control 1003:Knowledge:Authority control 992:15:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 969:11:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 916:00:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 898:23:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 856:22:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 827:22:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 795:02:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 772:22:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 747:00:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 725:23:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 704:02:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 673:02:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 641:00:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 596:01:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 577:00:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 549:11:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 533:11:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 510:11:27, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 444:10:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 411:00:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC) 372:22:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 316:22:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 283:21:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 262:19:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 248:19:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 231:19:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 165:18:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 130:18:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 3569: 3154:reverted the nomination ( 2222:. Personally, I recommend 1679:Regarding RMOS Consultancy 2214:Welcome to the Teahouse, 646:Welcome to the Teahouse, 539:Perfect! Thanks TRPoD. 2916:The preamble of article 1852:analysis and commentary 1589:may apply to Knowledge 1015:Knowledge:Reference desk 171:Draft:John Donald Barton 3471:aka The Red Pen of Doom 3066:WP:conflict of interest 2650:But I noticed you used 2565:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2409:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2391:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2201:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2165:Thank you, Ian Punnett 1867:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1832:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1666:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1401:aka The Red Pen of Doom 505:aka The Red Pen of Doom 398:User:BC1278/Ronen Shilo 392:User:BC1278/Ronen Shilo 389:would have been either 311:aka The Red Pen of Doom 189:Knowledge's Golden Rule 173:can become an article, 2999:SearchlightWindcharger 2981:SearchlightWindcharger 2950:SearchlightWindcharger 2935:SearchlightWindcharger 2721:. The basic format is 1127:how do i add a picture 1099:United Nations Charter 1061:Are you familiar with 1007:Help:Authority control 957:Talk:Plus Architecture 729:The question remains, 2507:Justlettersandnumbers 1925:Justlettersandnumbers 1452:Dear Knowledge-Team, 1304:Justlettersandnumbers 1289:Justlettersandnumbers 1216:Catholic Encyclopedia 1207:Catholic Encyclopedia 961:Justlettersandnumbers 46:of past discussions. 3464:conflict of interest 3158:), with the reason 3104:User with 2 accounts 2695:Commons:Flickr files 2232:autoconfirmed status 1899:conflict of interest 941:conflict of interest 193:significant coverage 3118:added themself to 2343:does have a point, 2067:Danaher Corporation 1990:White Arabian mare 1430:copyright violation 1377:Thanks in advance. 817:Kind regards David 764:Pithecanthropus4152 731:Pithecanthropus4152 717:Pithecanthropus4152 678:Pithecanthropus4152 648:Pithecanthropus4152 633:Pithecanthropus4152 356:User:BC1278/sandbox 341:User:BC1278/sandbox 3078:your first article 3062:requested articles 3045:Ajitkumarsinghpune 3030:Ajitkumarsinghpune 2224:Your first article 1977:White Arabian mare 1878:Gina Maria Mele MS 1812:Gina Maria Mele MS 1795:Gina Maria Mele MS 688:Infobox settlement 652:Palms, Los Angeles 18:Knowledge:Teahouse 3472: 3449: 3003:Original research 2637: 2566: 2410: 2392: 2284:and perhaps also 2266: 2202: 1868: 1833: 1708:RMOS Consultancy 1699: 1667: 1607: 1595:comment added by 1476:Franziska Poszler 1424:sources that are 1402: 1156:Wikimedia Commons 977:Authority Control 930:Plus Architecture 877:Plus Architecture 870: 800:Referencing query 535: 506: 417:Lists to columns? 312: 104: 103: 58: 57: 52:current main page 3560: 3534: 3473: 3470: 3443: 3436: 3434:Let's discuss it 3345: 3339: 3333: 3274: 3228: 3215: 3144:User:LindseyH140 3128: 2966: 2959: 2875: 2869: 2863: 2826: 2780: 2728: 2724: 2679: 2673: 2667: 2656:Joshua Ferdinand 2631: 2567: 2564: 2546: 2539: 2411: 2408: 2393: 2390: 2377: 2375:Let's discuss it 2260: 2245: 2243:Let's discuss it 2203: 2200: 2188: 2109: 2103: 2097: 1984: 1978: 1893:copyright policy 1869: 1866: 1834: 1831: 1823:We are not here 1815: 1760: 1754: 1748: 1710:RMOS Consultancy 1686: 1668: 1665: 1616:Deleting Account 1541:reliable sources 1403: 1400: 1340: 1333: 1278: 1272: 1267:Devotional medal 1233: 1226: 1202:Devotional medal 1185: 1178: 1095: 1075:. All the best, 1060: 1031: 1024: 864: 744: 742:Let's discuss it 692: 686: 670: 668:Let's discuss it 528: 521: 513: 507: 504: 399: 393: 383: 313: 310: 254:Roger (Dodger67) 226: 219: 198:reliable sources 160: 153: 82: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 3568: 3567: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3528: 3468: 3432: 3343: 3337: 3331: 3299: 3268: 3222: 3208: 3127: 3106: 3023: 2965: 2962: 2954: 2914: 2873: 2867: 2861: 2827:to the bottom. 2824: 2778: 2726: 2722: 2677: 2671: 2665: 2660:reliable source 2584: 2562: 2545: 2542: 2534: 2406: 2388: 2373: 2241: 2198: 2182: 2151: 2107: 2101: 2095: 1982: 1976: 1948: 1882:TheRedPenOfDoom 1864: 1829: 1809: 1774: 1758: 1752: 1746: 1681: 1663: 1618: 1573:Megaraptor12345 1519:Megaraptor12345 1511: 1491:their Help Desk 1450: 1434:Fuhghettaboutit 1398: 1357: 1339: 1336: 1328: 1322:Thank you too, 1276: 1270: 1232: 1229: 1221: 1198: 1184: 1181: 1173: 1129: 1089: 1054: 1030: 1027: 1019: 979: 802: 740: 690: 684: 666: 626: 604: 561: 527: 524: 516: 502: 498: 473: 419: 403:Fuhghettaboutit 397: 391: 377: 330: 308: 225: 222: 214: 159: 156: 148: 109: 78: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3566: 3564: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3508:David Biddulph 3501: 3500: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3441: 3391:Cordless Larry 3368: 3367: 3352: 3351: 3298: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3271:Cordless Larry 3256:Cordless Larry 3234: 3233: 3232: 3191: 3164: 3163: 3105: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3085: 3082:article wizard 3080:, and use the 3057: 3053: 3022: 3019: 3018: 3017: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2974: 2973: 2963: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2913: 2910: 2895: 2894: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2857:Cordless Larry 2843:Cordless Larry 2839: 2829:Cordless Larry 2806: 2805: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2783:Cordless Larry 2766: 2765: 2751: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2731:Cordless Larry 2711: 2710: 2709: 2699:Cordless Larry 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2583: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2543: 2442: 2441: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2398: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2322: 2321: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2290:Article wizard 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2209: 2208: 2194: 2150: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 1996: 1995: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1904:Our policy on 1902: 1895: 1817: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1641: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1597:65.175.243.206 1547: 1544: 1510: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1449: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1409: 1408: 1379:Karen Douglass 1365:Karen Douglass 1356: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1337: 1320: 1263:GrammarFascist 1230: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1182: 1164: 1163: 1151: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1107:NewYorkActuary 1057:NewYorkActuary 1042:NewYorkActuary 1028: 999:NewYorkActuary 984:NewYorkActuary 978: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 952: 951: 950: 946:Our policy on 944: 919: 918: 903: 902: 901: 900: 859: 858: 801: 798: 784: 783: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 709: 708: 707: 706: 681: 624: 603: 600: 599: 598: 566: 564: 559: 552: 551: 525: 512: 497: 496: 493: 490: 487: 484: 481: 477: 472: 471: 468: 465: 462: 459: 456: 452: 451: 450: 418: 415: 414: 413: 329: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 272: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 234: 233: 223: 210: 206: 167: 157: 140: 108: 105: 102: 101: 96: 93: 88: 83: 76: 71: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3565: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3532: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3486: 3477: 3474: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3447: 3446:edit conflict 3442: 3440: 3437: 3435: 3430: 3429: 3424: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3369: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3353: 3350: 3346: 3344:contributions 3340: 3334: 3328: 3324: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3307: 3303: 3296: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3272: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3230: 3229: 3226: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3216: 3213: 3212: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3140: 3137: 3135: 3130: 3125: 3124:User:10redmoe 3121: 3117: 3113: 3111: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3086: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3028: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2995: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2969: 2967: 2960: 2957: 2951: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2919: 2911: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2893: 2888: 2887: 2880: 2876: 2874:contributions 2870: 2864: 2858: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2776: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2747: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2680: 2678:contributions 2674: 2668: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2640: 2635: 2634:edit conflict 2630: 2629: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2590: 2581: 2571: 2568: 2558: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2547: 2540: 2537: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2439: 2438: 2427: 2424: 2422: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2412: 2403: 2399: 2397: 2394: 2385: 2381: 2378: 2376: 2371: 2370: 2365: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2324: 2323: 2320: 2317: 2315: 2311: 2305: 2302: 2300: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2264: 2263:edit conflict 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2249: 2246: 2244: 2239: 2238: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2207: 2204: 2195: 2192: 2186: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2163: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2148: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2114: 2110: 2108:contributions 2104: 2098: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2042: 2041: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1999: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1989: 1985: 1979: 1972: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1952: 1945: 1943: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1921: 1916: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1900: 1896: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1870: 1861: 1857: 1854:specifically 1853: 1849: 1845: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1835: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1813: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1777: 1771: 1765: 1761: 1759:contributions 1755: 1749: 1744:is related.— 1743: 1742:This question 1740: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1703: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1672: 1669: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1615: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1472: 1469: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1453: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1354: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1334: 1331: 1325: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285:4500 articles 1282: 1275: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1227: 1224: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1203: 1195: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1179: 1176: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1126: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1093: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1069: 1064: 1058: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1025: 1022: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 995: 994: 993: 989: 985: 976: 970: 966: 962: 958: 953: 949: 945: 942: 938: 937: 935: 931: 927: 923: 922: 921: 920: 917: 913: 909: 905: 904: 899: 896: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 868: 867:edit conflict 863: 862: 861: 860: 857: 854: 853: 849: 848: 843: 839: 835: 831: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 815: 812: 809: 806: 799: 797: 796: 792: 788: 781: 780: 773: 769: 765: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 748: 745: 743: 738: 737: 732: 728: 727: 726: 722: 718: 713: 712: 711: 710: 705: 702: 700: 696: 689: 682: 679: 676: 675: 674: 671: 669: 664: 663: 657: 653: 649: 645: 644: 643: 642: 638: 634: 629: 623: 620: 616: 613: 607: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 580: 579: 578: 574: 570: 558: 556: 550: 546: 542: 538: 537: 536: 534: 531: 529: 522: 519: 511: 508: 494: 491: 488: 485: 482: 479: 478: 476: 469: 466: 463: 460: 457: 454: 453: 448: 447: 446: 445: 441: 437: 432: 429: 426: 423: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 394: 387: 381: 376: 375: 374: 373: 369: 365: 360: 357: 353: 348: 345: 342: 338: 333: 327: 323: 317: 314: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 280: 276: 269: 268: 263: 259: 255: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 236: 235: 232: 229: 227: 220: 217: 211: 207: 204: 200: 199: 194: 190: 186: 185: 180: 179:mere mentions 176: 172: 168: 166: 163: 161: 154: 151: 145: 141: 138: 134: 133: 132: 131: 127: 123: 118: 115: 112: 106: 100: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 81: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3433: 3427: 3304: 3300: 3210: 3209: 3165: 3142:I nominated 3141: 3138: 3131: 3114: 3107: 3069: 3048: 3024: 2955: 2932: 2915: 2896: 2719:on this page 2585: 2535: 2528: 2524: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2374: 2368: 2364:Dirk van Erp 2293: 2242: 2236: 2167: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2155: 2152: 2046: 2000: 1997: 1970: 1967: 1953: 1949: 1941: 1914: 1910:Terms of Use 1792: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1725:Rajnitsharma 1707: 1657: 1656: 1619: 1591:— Preceding 1567:Few, thanks 1514: 1512: 1473: 1470: 1454: 1451: 1376: 1358: 1355:Page content 1329: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1280: 1222: 1215: 1205: 1199: 1174: 1168: 1130: 1066: 1020: 980: 851: 846: 816: 813: 810: 807: 803: 787:Samuelcobalt 785: 741: 735: 667: 661: 630: 627: 621: 617: 608: 605: 562: 553: 517: 499: 474: 433: 430: 427: 424: 420: 396: 390: 386:page history 361: 349: 346: 334: 331: 273: 215: 202: 196: 192: 182: 178: 149: 143: 120:Thanks Alan 119: 116: 113: 110: 79: 47: 41: 3409:PrimeHunter 3332:Vchimpanzee 3203:LindseyH140 2899:Pippathecat 2862:Vchimpanzee 2811:Pippathecat 2755:Pippathecat 2715:Pippathecat 2691:Vchimpanzee 2666:Vchimpanzee 2639:Pippathecat 2611:Finnusertop 2592:Pippathecat 2529:recommended 2096:Vchimpanzee 2091:Ryancormack 1856:attributed 1747:Vchimpanzee 1569:Ian.Thomson 1555:Ian.thomson 1517:can edit. 1426:independent 1287:. Regards, 959:. Regards, 584:Checkingfax 569:Checkingfax 352:Ronen Shilo 337:Ronen Shilo 326:Ronen Shilo 324:Reviewi of 203:independent 99:Archive 405 91:Archive 400 86:Archive 399 80:Archive 398 74:Archive 397 69:Archive 396 64:Archive 395 40:This is an 2855:Thank you 2753:Thank you 2476:notability 1638:Lorzendel2 1623:Lorzendel2 1394:Draft:Airy 1160:Wikimarkup 1103:0 (number) 943:guidelines 926:Davidevitt 908:Davidevitt 838:categories 834:Davidevitt 819:Davidevitt 805:retained. 557:, I like: 184:notability 3122:as both 3090:ColinFine 3007:ColinFine 2725:(replace 2619:guestbook 2607:PD-author 2499:Draft:Foo 2129:kerfuffle 2078:kerfuffle 2050:kerfuffle 2027:ColinFine 2019:kerfuffle 2003:kerfuffle 1956:kerfuffle 1850:with any 1729:ColinFine 1689:ColinFine 1422:secondary 885:WP:CSD#A7 842:wikilinks 588:Bromley86 555:Bromley86 541:Bromley86 436:Bromley86 240:Bromley86 201:that are 22:Questions 3460:spamming 3199:10redmoe 3116:10redmoe 2964:contribs 2918:Scarcity 2623:contribs 2544:contribs 2521:Ipunnett 2495:Ipunnett 2460:Ipunnett 2345:Ipunnett 2269:Ipunnett 2216:Ipunnett 2196:oops -- 2185:Ipunnett 2169:Ipunnett 1915:required 1658:Accounts 1649:LukeSurl 1593:unsigned 1418:reliable 1338:contribs 1274:Catholic 1231:contribs 1183:contribs 1029:contribs 852:computer 526:contribs 475:or like 428:becomes 224:contribs 158:contribs 144:official 20:‎ | 3531:DATA180 3490:DATA180 3423:DATA180 3421:Hello, 3387:DATA180 3373:DATA180 3357:DATA180 3323:DATA180 3309:DATA180 3134:deleted 3074:WP:PAID 3043:Hello, 2958:Fascist 2956:Grammar 2948:Hello, 2727:caption 2538:Fascist 2536:Grammar 2481:Maproom 2341:Maproom 2328:Maproom 2267:Hello, 2001:Cheers 1858:to the 1846:as the 1723:Hello, 1538:WP:CITE 1495:ukexpat 1332:Fascist 1330:Grammar 1324:ukexpat 1249:ukexpat 1247:help?-- 1225:Fascist 1223:Grammar 1177:Fascist 1175:Grammar 1146:Hello, 1092:HazelAB 1077:HazelAB 1023:Fascist 1021:Grammar 997:Hello, 889:neutral 847:Rubbish 612:Sanborn 582:Thanks 520:Fascist 518:Grammar 296:WP:FAIR 275:AlBarts 218:Fascist 216:Grammar 175:AlBarts 152:Fascist 150:Grammar 137:AlBarts 135:Hello, 122:AlBarts 43:archive 3541:Thnidu 3469:TRPoD 3454:a URL 3428:Cullen 3277:Thnidu 3252:Thnidu 3250:Also, 3238:Thnidu 3195:Thnidu 3188:WP:SPI 3184:Thnidu 3169:Thnidu 3152:GB fan 2920:says: 2897:Thanks 2563:TRPoD 2407:TRPoD 2404:. -- 2389:TRPoD 2369:Cullen 2294:before 2237:Cullen 2228:Primer 2199:TRPoD 2074:Thanks 1865:TRPoD 1830:TRPoD 1664:TRPoD 1515:anyone 1399:TRPoD 1281:should 1148:Shenek 1133:Shenek 871:Hello 832:Hello 736:Cullen 662:Cullen 503:TRPoD 380:BC1278 364:BC1278 350:After 335:After 309:TRPoD 302:, not 3327:WP:EL 1983:Neigh 1862:. -- 1636:Dear 1414:Karen 1308:which 1212:WP:PD 881:cited 873:David 565:30em 16:< 3545:talk 3512:talk 3494:talk 3413:talk 3395:talk 3377:talk 3361:talk 3338:talk 3313:talk 3281:talk 3260:talk 3242:talk 3182:Hi, 3173:talk 3126:and 3108:See 3094:talk 3070:must 3049:only 3034:talk 3011:talk 2985:talk 2939:talk 2903:talk 2868:talk 2847:talk 2833:talk 2815:talk 2787:talk 2759:talk 2735:talk 2703:talk 2672:talk 2652:imdb 2615:talk 2609:}}. 2596:talk 2511:talk 2493:Hi, 2485:talk 2464:talk 2332:talk 2275:and 2173:talk 2133:talk 2102:talk 2082:talk 2054:talk 2031:talk 2007:talk 1971:must 1960:talk 1929:talk 1897:Our 1891:Our 1876:Hi, 1799:talk 1753:talk 1733:talk 1714:talk 1693:talk 1647:. -- 1627:talk 1601:talk 1577:talk 1559:talk 1523:talk 1499:talk 1480:talk 1464:and 1438:talk 1383:talk 1369:talk 1361:Airy 1293:talk 1253:talk 1137:talk 1111:talk 1081:talk 1046:talk 1005:and 988:talk 965:talk 939:Our 924:Hi, 912:talk 823:talk 791:talk 768:talk 721:talk 637:talk 592:talk 573:talk 545:talk 495:2010 492:2011 489:2012 486:2013 483:2014 480:2015 470:2010 467:2011 464:2012 461:2013 458:2014 455:2015 440:talk 407:talk 368:talk 332:Hi, 279:talk 258:talk 244:talk 126:talk 111:Hi, 3347:• 3225:Liz 2927:it. 2877:• 2750:is? 2681:• 2421:DES 2349:DES 2314:DES 2299:DES 2111:• 1827:-- 1808:Hi 1762:• 1553:. 1493:.-- 1412:Hi 1317:why 1313:all 893:DES 699:DES 395:or 306:-- 195:in 3547:) 3514:) 3496:) 3415:) 3407:. 3397:) 3379:) 3363:) 3341:• 3335:• 3315:) 3283:) 3262:) 3244:) 3214:iz 3197:. 3175:) 3167:-- 3150:. 3132:I 3129:. 3112:. 3096:) 3088:-- 3036:) 3013:) 2987:) 2941:) 2905:) 2871:• 2865:• 2849:) 2835:) 2817:) 2789:) 2761:) 2737:) 2705:) 2697:. 2675:• 2669:• 2625:) 2621:| 2617:| 2598:) 2523:, 2513:) 2487:) 2466:) 2334:) 2234:. 2175:) 2135:) 2105:• 2099:• 2084:) 2056:) 2033:) 2009:) 1986:) 1962:) 1931:) 1801:) 1756:• 1750:• 1735:) 1716:) 1695:) 1629:) 1603:) 1579:) 1571:. 1561:) 1525:) 1501:) 1482:) 1468:) 1460:, 1440:) 1420:, 1385:) 1371:) 1295:) 1277:}} 1271:{{ 1255:) 1139:) 1113:) 1083:) 1048:) 990:) 967:) 914:) 825:) 793:) 770:) 723:) 691:}} 685:{{ 639:) 594:) 586:! 575:) 547:) 442:) 409:) 370:) 281:) 260:) 246:) 128:) 95:→ 3543:( 3533:: 3529:@ 3510:( 3492:( 3448:) 3444:( 3411:( 3393:( 3375:( 3359:( 3311:( 3279:( 3273:: 3269:@ 3258:( 3240:( 3227:: 3223:@ 3211:L 3171:( 3092:( 3084:. 3032:( 3009:( 2983:( 2937:( 2901:( 2845:( 2831:( 2825:] 2813:( 2785:( 2779:] 2757:( 2733:( 2723:] 2701:( 2636:) 2632:( 2613:( 2594:( 2532:— 2509:( 2483:( 2462:( 2330:( 2265:) 2261:( 2187:: 2183:@ 2171:( 2131:( 2080:( 2052:( 2029:( 2005:( 1980:( 1958:( 1927:( 1814:: 1810:@ 1797:( 1731:( 1712:( 1691:( 1625:( 1599:( 1575:( 1557:( 1521:( 1497:( 1478:( 1436:( 1381:( 1367:( 1291:( 1251:( 1135:( 1109:( 1094:: 1090:@ 1079:( 1059:: 1055:@ 1044:( 986:( 963:( 910:( 869:) 865:( 821:( 789:( 766:( 719:( 635:( 590:( 571:( 543:( 438:( 405:( 382:: 378:@ 366:( 277:( 256:( 242:( 124:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 398 - Knowledge

Index