Knowledge

:Trust network - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

144:
well-established and respected editors, concentrating on different areas of Knowledge, may have no contact between each other for some time. Reading an editor's user page, browsing through their contributions, and reading the threads in their talk are valuable but time-consuming methods of getting to know someone. Discovering that several reputable users, or users that you have particular regard for, have expressed their trust in an editor is a strong indicator of that editor's value to Knowledge. However, the sheer number of editors who trust a user should not be taken as a clear measurement of that user's trustworthiness: the fact that a user is trusted by dozens of suspected
290:
would not be appropriate to make statements of trust as part of deals, either for tit-for-tat recognition or for a favour elsewhere. Again, since it is unlikely that anybody offering such an arrangement is a respected member of the community, there is little benefit in having that person declare their trust in you. It is important to remember that the trust network is not a popularity contest, and so there is no need to actively seek out declarations of trust. The fact that another user has not made a declaration of trust in your favour is by no means a declaration of distrust.
152:
that their contributions are civil, constructive and of generally high quality. It is important that the trust network does not just become a popularity contest, and that the lack of an explicit statement of trust should never be interpreted as a statement of distrust. Additionally, it would be wise to consider carefully any thoughts of writing explicit statements of
21: 281:, are attack-resistant, but may require a core "seed" of users trusted by the metric itself. Different choices for this seeding will produce different results, and different users will decide on completely distinct seed choices: there is therefore no prospect of this producing an official editor rating system through Knowledge using this system. 117:. This proposed system for the English Knowledge shares the three key ideas of Vertrauensnetz: giving users a formal way of declaring their confidence in other users, a way of seeing which users have declared their trust of a particular user, and the resulting structure of trust-relationships formed between all users ( 289:
Declarations of trust should be limited to users the declarer has high confidence in, but not necessarily all those that they like or agree with. Since "who trusts you?" is more important than "how many people trust you?" there is little point in creating sock puppets to declare trust in yourself. It
151:
There are a variety of reasons to express trust in another user: you may have worked together on a proposal or article, reviewed many of their edits in articles on your watchlist, or know them personally. Liking another user should not generally be enough; trusting somebody requires being confident
293:
A web of trust should not be overly relied upon. Naturally, new but excellent contributors will take time to be integrated into the web. Neither does the web document even widespread distrust of a user. For this reason, it will always be important to peruse user and user talk pages, as well as an
269:
accounts to trust oneself). Another is to count how many links there are in the chain of trust between yourself and another user: if I trust A, who trusts B, who trusts C, and this is the shortest path from myself to C, then C is three links away from me. I might decide that I explicitly trust
143:
The web of trust is neither a popularity contest nor a measurement or assessment of an editor's trustworthiness or value. However, it provides an additional piece of information that may be useful when coming across another user for the first time. The Knowledge user base is so large that two
264:
to rate individual users. There are very many different ways to do this, which will produce quite different results, and it is important to note that no metric is endorsed by this proposal. The simplest trust metric is to count the number of users who trust the rated user, but this system is
248:
The network can help to reveal the extent to which Knowledge contributors are trusted by their peers. This information might serve several purposes: for instance, as an indicator when considering to what extent the Knowledge content added by a user can be trusted, when taking part in
329:
The web consists simply of a collection of trust-relationships: it measures nothing. However, this information could be extracted from Knowledge and analysed, in many different ways, to produce "trust values" for individual users. The results will vary depending on which
270:
anybody one link away from me, and implicitly trust anybody up to three links away. This is very different to the previous case: the measurement is personal, not absolute, and will not be affected by sock puppetry.
1390: 82:
The trust network exists to allow users to systematically document their trust-relationships, and to see which users have declared trust in another user. It is not a popularity contest or editor rating.
926: 121:). The key differences between the inactive system and the presently proposed are that the inactive system relied upon the editing of a centrally-stored table and allowed formal expressions of 1314: 684: 310:. The nodes are individual users, with the relationship "User X trusts User Y" resulting in an edge directed from User X's node to User Y's. The web of trust can therefore be analysed using 1171: 909: 578: 1333: 679: 1338: 1055: 904: 204: 174: 694: 1262: 899: 632: 970: 689: 674: 1154: 921: 849: 365: 620: 1115: 1075: 1008: 1080: 1060: 1018: 753: 35:
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the
1050: 1193: 669: 1422: 894: 235:
After that, make a list of Wikipedians that you trust, making use of the template {{I trust|User name|Reason (optional)}} – for an example, see
1304: 1085: 931: 871: 499: 1070: 946: 803: 768: 615: 605: 1459: 1181: 1065: 992: 1289: 1164: 941: 716: 548: 1454: 1294: 1279: 1040: 936: 610: 600: 590: 494: 489: 196: 36: 1442: 1402: 1343: 1326: 1299: 721: 661: 479: 358: 1571: 1105: 1001: 997: 963: 832: 711: 469: 437: 254: 43: 1566: 1380: 1274: 1222: 1200: 820: 704: 558: 484: 464: 1412: 1365: 1284: 1232: 1149: 1013: 543: 1417: 1210: 1205: 980: 157: 1545: 1498: 1481: 1466: 1385: 1159: 1030: 553: 538: 530: 511: 504: 426: 351: 207:), which provides direct links to lists of other users who trust that user, and also the contributors that user trusts. 278: 1375: 1309: 1257: 1227: 1110: 975: 953: 773: 735: 1476: 1247: 1217: 1176: 987: 839: 815: 644: 573: 386: 1427: 1321: 1237: 1188: 844: 780: 1510: 1493: 1488: 1137: 916: 881: 758: 585: 415: 1045: 827: 449: 266: 226: 217: 145: 1535: 114: 1471: 1142: 886: 743: 474: 236: 192: 102: 864: 798: 790: 656: 627: 595: 454: 307: 200: 1540: 859: 854: 459: 181: 1432: 1353: 1269: 1132: 1122: 958: 432: 394: 374: 250: 1369: 1437: 1127: 763: 748: 526: 52: 28: 20: 94: 810: 699: 188: 1357: 731: 444: 294:
editor's contributions, when trying to find out about a user you have recently encountered.
106: 1522: 1517: 568: 563: 405: 314:: a copy of the entire web of trust could be extracted from Knowledge for this purpose. 1505: 1449: 639: 516: 420: 303: 232:
template, writing {{Trust network|Example user}} where "Example user" is your username.
133: 1560: 137: 331: 311: 261: 90: 129: 110: 98: 274: 343: 177:, where Example user is the user being considered. Alternatively, use 392:
For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the
101:
on 17 February 2004. Its implementation in the German Knowledge as
384:
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the
347: 15: 93:" is inspired by the mailing list thread that began with 60: 302:
Strictly speaking, the "web of trust" is actually a
27:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
1401: 1352: 1246: 1096: 1029: 880: 789: 730: 655: 525: 404: 334:is used, and none is officially endorsed. See the 175:Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Example user/Trusted by 265:vulnerable to attack (for instance, the use of 359: 216:Make a /Trust subpage of your userpage, e.g. 118: 8: 260:The network itself can be analysed using a 366: 352: 344: 72: 128:In March 2005 it was started on Meta as 322: 164:Using the features of the trust network 273:More advanced metrics, most famously 7: 690:Science, technology and engineering 148:would only harm their reputation. 97:by Jimbo Wales and was started by 14: 335: 754:A nice cup of tea and a sit down 44:Knowledge:Personal acquaintances 19: 1376:Wikimedia Foundation elections 1051:Dispute resolution noticeboard 695:Knowledge assistance and tasks 211:To assert trust in other users 1: 1056:Biographies of living persons 187:with the username to produce 42:A related active project is 895:Administrators' noticeboard 769:Compliment before criticism 606:Featured article candidates 76:This system in a nutshell: 1588: 50: 1531: 381: 1155:Copyright investigations 601:Good article nominations 591:Articles for improvement 298:Structure of the network 253:, or when considering a 169:To see who trusts a user 103:Knowledge:Vertrauensnetz 1572:Knowledge trust network 554:Articles needing images 549:Images needing articles 279:innovative trust metric 218:User:Example user/Trust 1567:Inactive project pages 1106:Regional notice boards 998:Requests for adminship 722:Organizations category 712:Counter-Vandalism Unit 470:Centralized discussion 237:User:TheGrappler/Trust 156:, bearing in mind the 1403:Directories, indexes, 1076:Neutral point of view 1009:Arbitration Committee 559:Articles for creation 465:The Knowledge Library 338:for more information. 255:request for adminship 251:recent changes patrol 89:This proposal for a " 1366:Requests for comment 1150:Copyright assistance 1081:No original research 1061:Conflict of interest 1041:Requests for comment 872:Controversial issues 675:Culture and the arts 544:Most-wanted articles 336:applications section 285:Potential for misuse 1418:Edit summary legend 685:History and society 628:Article translation 375:Knowledge community 158:no personal attacks 1499:Citation templates 1386:Voting is not evil 1334:Arguments to avoid 1097:Other noticeboards 539:Requested articles 1554: 1553: 1339:Arguments to make 1228:General sanctions 1172:Resource requests 1111:Requests for help 954:Revision deletion 791:Maintenance tasks 774:Kindness Campaign 406:General community 87: 86: 71: 70: 1579: 1233:Editor sanctions 1194:Page importation 1123:Asking questions 1086:Reliable sources 937:User permissions 845:Category tracker 840:Database reports 387:Community portal 368: 361: 354: 345: 339: 327: 231: 225: 186: 180: 134:m:Vertrauensnetz 73: 63: 47: 40: 23: 16: 1587: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1550: 1527: 1455:Manual of Style 1397: 1348: 1242: 1238:Long-term abuse 1182:History mergers 1165:Media questions 1092: 1071:Fringe theories 1031:Content dispute 1025: 981:Title blacklist 932:Page protection 917:Admin dashboard 876: 785: 726: 651: 521: 400: 377: 372: 342: 328: 324: 320: 300: 287: 246: 229: 223: 213: 184: 178: 171: 166: 105:was started by 67: 66: 59: 55: 41: 34: 12: 11: 5: 1585: 1583: 1575: 1574: 1569: 1559: 1558: 1552: 1551: 1549: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1526: 1525: 1520: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1491: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1479: 1474: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1452: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1423:Editor's index 1420: 1415: 1409: 1407: 1405: 1399: 1398: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1388: 1378: 1373: 1362: 1360: 1350: 1349: 1347: 1346: 1344:Article Rescue 1341: 1336: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1307: 1302: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1244: 1243: 1241: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1208: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1174: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1140: 1138:Reference desk 1135: 1130: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1108: 1102: 1100: 1099:and assistance 1098: 1094: 1093: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1083: 1078: 1073: 1068: 1066:External links 1063: 1058: 1048: 1043: 1037: 1035: 1032: 1027: 1026: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1016: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1002:bureaucratship 990: 985: 984: 983: 978: 968: 967: 966: 956: 951: 950: 949: 944: 939: 934: 929: 922:Admin requests 919: 914: 913: 912: 907: 902: 891: 889: 884: 882:Administrators 878: 877: 875: 874: 869: 868: 867: 865:Recent changes 862: 852: 850:Dusty articles 847: 842: 837: 836: 835: 825: 824: 823: 821:Admin category 818: 808: 807: 806: 795: 793: 787: 786: 784: 783: 778: 777: 776: 771: 761: 759:Charitableness 756: 751: 746: 740: 738: 728: 727: 725: 724: 719: 714: 709: 708: 707: 705:Recent changes 697: 692: 687: 682: 677: 672: 666: 664: 662:collaborations 659: 653: 652: 650: 649: 648: 647: 637: 636: 635: 625: 624: 623: 618: 613: 603: 598: 593: 588: 586:Vital articles 583: 582: 581: 576: 571: 566: 556: 551: 546: 541: 535: 533: 523: 522: 520: 519: 514: 509: 508: 507: 502: 497: 492: 487: 482: 472: 467: 462: 457: 452: 447: 442: 441: 440: 435: 430: 418: 416:Administration 412: 410: 407: 402: 401: 391: 382: 379: 378: 373: 371: 370: 363: 356: 348: 341: 340: 321: 319: 316: 306:rather than a 304:directed graph 299: 296: 286: 283: 245: 242: 241: 240: 233: 220: 212: 209: 170: 167: 165: 162: 130:m:Web of trust 85: 84: 78: 77: 69: 68: 65: 64: 56: 51: 48: 33: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1584: 1573: 1570: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1562: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1530: 1524: 1521: 1519: 1516: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1451: 1448: 1444: 1443:Abbreviations 1441: 1440: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1408: 1406:and summaries 1404: 1400: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1364: 1363: 1361: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1335: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1253: 1251: 1245: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1207: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1160:Text problems 1158: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1095: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1079: 1077: 1074: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1047: 1046:Third opinion 1044: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1034: 1028: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1007: 1003: 999: 996: 995: 994: 991: 989: 986: 982: 979: 977: 974: 973: 972: 969: 965: 962: 961: 960: 957: 955: 952: 948: 945: 943: 940: 938: 935: 933: 930: 928: 925: 924: 923: 920: 918: 915: 911: 908: 906: 903: 901: 898: 897: 896: 893: 892: 890: 888: 883: 879: 873: 870: 866: 863: 861: 858: 857: 856: 855:Special pages 853: 851: 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 834: 831: 830: 829: 828:Edit requests 826: 822: 819: 817: 814: 813: 812: 809: 805: 802: 801: 800: 797: 796: 794: 792: 788: 782: 779: 775: 772: 770: 767: 766: 765: 762: 760: 757: 755: 752: 750: 747: 745: 742: 741: 739: 737: 733: 729: 723: 720: 718: 717:Accessibility 715: 713: 710: 706: 703: 702: 701: 698: 696: 693: 691: 688: 686: 683: 681: 678: 676: 673: 671: 668: 667: 665: 663: 658: 654: 646: 643: 642: 641: 638: 634: 631: 630: 629: 626: 622: 619: 617: 614: 612: 609: 608: 607: 604: 602: 599: 597: 594: 592: 589: 587: 584: 580: 577: 575: 572: 570: 567: 565: 562: 561: 560: 557: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 540: 537: 536: 534: 532: 528: 524: 518: 515: 513: 510: 506: 503: 501: 500:Miscellaneous 498: 496: 493: 491: 488: 486: 483: 481: 478: 477: 476: 473: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 450:Mailing lists 448: 446: 443: 439: 436: 434: 431: 429: 428: 424: 423: 422: 419: 417: 414: 413: 411: 409: 403: 399: 397: 396: 389: 388: 380: 376: 369: 364: 362: 357: 355: 350: 349: 346: 337: 333: 326: 323: 317: 315: 313: 309: 305: 297: 295: 291: 284: 282: 280: 276: 271: 268: 263: 258: 256: 252: 243: 238: 234: 228: 227:Trust network 221: 219: 215: 214: 210: 208: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 183: 176: 168: 163: 161: 159: 155: 149: 147: 141: 139: 135: 131: 126: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 83: 80: 79: 75: 74: 62: 58: 57: 54: 49: 45: 38: 32: 30: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1472:Five pillars 1381:WP Democracy 1143:Adopt-a-user 993:Bureaucrats' 947:Open proxies 905:Edit warring 887:noticeboards 744:Reward board 680:Geographical 657:WikiProjects 475:Village pump 438:In the media 427:The Signpost 425: 393: 385: 383: 332:trust metric 325: 312:graph theory 301: 292: 288: 272: 262:trust metric 259: 247: 244:Applications 222:Include the 189:Example user 172: 153: 150: 142: 127: 122: 115:23 July 2004 95:this posting 91:web of trust 88: 81: 37:village pump 26: 1523:Wiki markup 1413:Departments 1250:discussions 1019:Enforcement 942:Sockpuppets 799:Task Center 596:Peer review 455:Wikipedians 146:sockpuppets 107:Sansculotte 1561:Categories 1482:Guidelines 1460:Simplified 1391:Milestones 1327:Undeletion 1300:Miscellany 1290:Categories 1033:resolution 804:Open tasks 460:Statistics 267:sockpuppet 205:trusted by 31:reference. 29:historical 1546:Templates 1494:Templates 1489:Shortcuts 1354:Elections 1295:Redirects 1280:Templates 1223:Education 1211:Whitelist 1206:Blacklist 1133:Help desk 971:Usernames 959:Oversight 910:Vandalism 900:Incidents 860:New pages 670:Directory 640:Main Page 495:Technical 490:Proposals 433:Goings-on 395:Dashboard 119:see below 1541:Category 1477:Policies 1438:Glossary 1310:Proposed 1275:Articles 1248:Deletion 1128:Teahouse 1116:Category 1014:Requests 976:Changing 833:Category 816:Category 764:WikiLove 749:Contests 736:feedback 616:Pictures 574:Creation 569:WP:AFC/C 564:WP:AFC/R 527:Contents 512:Holidays 480:Idea lab 275:Advogato 197:contribs 160:policy. 154:distrust 138:Arnomane 123:distrust 61:WP:TRUST 53:Shortcut 1177:Mergers 964:Request 927:Closure 811:Backlog 781:Thanks! 700:Patrols 531:grading 445:Meetups 308:network 1428:Essays 1358:voting 1322:Review 1305:Speedy 732:Awards 645:Errors 621:Topics 485:Policy 408:topics 201:trusts 173:Go to 1536:Media 1518:Tools 1511:Today 1467:Rules 1285:Files 1270:Today 1263:Admin 1258:Guide 1189:Moves 633:Pages 611:Lists 318:Notes 182:trust 111:Elian 99:Pcb21 1506:Tips 1450:Help 1433:FAQs 1370:meta 1356:and 1218:Bots 1201:Spam 1000:and 988:OTRS 885:and 734:and 660:and 579:Help 529:and 517:Bots 421:News 193:talk 132:and 109:and 1315:BLP 505:WMF 277:'s 257:. 136:by 113:on 1563:: 230:}} 224:{{ 203:• 199:• 195:• 185:}} 179:{{ 140:. 125:. 46:. 1372:) 1368:( 398:. 390:. 367:e 360:t 353:v 239:. 191:( 39:.

Index


historical
village pump
Knowledge:Personal acquaintances
Shortcut
WP:TRUST
web of trust
this posting
Pcb21
Knowledge:Vertrauensnetz
Sansculotte
Elian
23 July 2004
see below
m:Web of trust
m:Vertrauensnetz
Arnomane
sockpuppets
no personal attacks
Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Example user/Trusted by
trust
Example user
talk
contribs
trusts
trusted by
User:Example user/Trust
Trust network
User:TheGrappler/Trust
recent changes patrol

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑