Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject .NET/Assessment - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

620: 396: 953: 887: 105:
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the
914:. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a 34:! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Knowledge (XXG)'s .NET articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the 1441:
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or
166:
below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process that must be followed; this is documented in the
1535:
Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is
687:(a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. 72:
to prepare for static releases of Knowledge (XXG) content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Knowledge (XXG) as a
1430:
The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
1400:
A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the
2104: 131:
below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process that must be followed; this is documented in the
1339: 919: 116:
is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural
1531:
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are
833: 865:
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
1082:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); 896:
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
1079: 1381: 1000: 1507:
should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
1028: 806: 41:
The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the .NET project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of
183:
If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the
1281: 904: 153: 68:
The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the
56: 1214: 431:
exemplifies Knowledge (XXG)'s very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the
1032: 1024: 868:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
829: 821: 601:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
177:
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
1632: 1349: 1298: 1016: 578: 522: 363: 915: 837: 410: 1248:
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.
1612: 1406: 1373: 1359: 802: 574: 421: 1941: 1901: 1839: 1622: 1617: 1607: 1234: 971: 634: 558: 1870: 1627: 1312: 204: 96: 83: 1481:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
1020: 645: 2001: 1725: 285: 1285: 1154: 967: 927:
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.
476: 184: 1805: 1768: 317: 295: 42: 1981: 1909: 1753: 1102: 1090: 1991: 1986: 1976: 1919: 1914: 2119: 1996: 1955: 1924: 1853: 1884: 1736: 1386:
It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and
1206: 911: 1813: 1776: 1746: 1741: 1731: 1710: 258: 224: 1818: 1786: 1781: 1562: 1321: 721:, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. 503: 1685: 1645: 332: 275: 241: 1693: 1656: 1558: 1252: 428: 406: 1703: 1698: 1666: 1661: 1651: 1565:, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. 1470: 1504: 1397:
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
1308: 1218: 1071: 798: 790: 699: 570: 566: 432: 113: 31: 17: 2075: 1552: 1523: 356: 1402: 1363: 1302: 1075: 1012: 752: 718: 512: 489:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
630: 542: 1574: 957: 624: 400: 1210: 1141: 1045: 981: 588: 562: 462: 458: 1425: 1271: 891: 1169: 1129: 668: 486: 466: 856:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
395: 931: 619: 349: 2056: 1475:
An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
1106: 499: 494: 2007: 1963: 1932: 1861: 1447:
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
2028: 1892: 2042: 2035: 2021: 853: 794: 2049: 1759: 1830: 1796: 738: 1451: 1432: 886: 771: 324:
Note that lists are assessed using the same scale as other articles; however, they progress towards
1571:
Lists should be lists of live links to Knowledge (XXG) articles, appropriately named and organized.
1568:
There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
1716: 1676: 1284:. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach 1191: 1187: 786: 703: 695: 554: 1230: 1336:
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
1195: 309:
For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:
102:
template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?
1327: 825: 541:: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see 1061: 1060:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
525:
that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
1358:
The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be
1342:, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. 714: 69: 35: 930:
Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.
598:
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
325: 264: 230: 1158:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 1493:
Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
1316: 910:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in
304:(for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary 2113: 457:: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are 156:
can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there.
734: 532: 2063: 1251:
Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing
918:. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. 587:
It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses
127:
and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the
1352:
and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
1528:
A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.
1387: 767: 545:
for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
789:
and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Knowledge (XXG)'s
246:
should only be used for articles that have successfully passed through the
1376:
etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
451:: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; 1348:
Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a
1168:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 1140:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
671:
that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
1255:
on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
2105:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/.NET articles by quality log
633:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
409:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
335:. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below. 213:{{Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET/template| ... | class=??? | ...}} 435:
for all Knowledge (XXG) articles, it has the following attributes.
1500:
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.
1450:
Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve
1315:
is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of
713:(c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for 1372:
Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an
1338:
It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an
970:, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from 331:
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in
263:
should only be used for articles that are currently listed as
229:
should only be used for articles that are currently listed as
836:
are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize
1370:
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
704:
four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations
531:: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical 1487:
Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
1540: 1511: 1458: 1413: 1311:, and any important or controversial material which is 1259: 938: 872: 605: 445:: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; 1490:
A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
316:(for any pages that are religion lists; adds pages to 89:
to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
733:
It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful,
1589: 139:
6. Can I request that someone else rate an article?
774:; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. 766:It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, 557:and other media, where appropriate, with succinct 149:7. Where can I get more comments about an article? 1001:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 247: 1388:technical terms should be explained or avoided 873:List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events 803:criteria for the inclusion of non-free content 657:It features professional standards of writing. 196:An article's assessment is generated from the 180:10. What if I have a question not listed here? 76:2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 65:1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? 357: 8: 168: 163: 143: 133: 128: 142:Of course; to do so, please list it in the 1586: 575:criteria for inclusion of non-free content 372: 364: 350: 344:WikiProject article quality grading scheme 205:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET/template 97:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET/template 84:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET/template 1590:.NET articles by quality and importance 1366:does not need to be followed rigorously. 393: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1606: 1380:The article presents its content in an 1356:The article is reasonably well-written. 884: 333:Category:Unassessed-Class .NET articles 159:8. What if I don't agree with a rating? 465:and are supported by inline citations 1626: 617: 328:rather than featured article status. 7: 1360:of the standard of featured articles 1346:The article has a defined structure. 952: 950: 1631: 1003:; spelling and grammar are correct; 912:Knowledge (XXG):Article development 801:images and other media satisfy the 495:Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy 286:Category:Start-Class .NET articles 216:The following values may be used: 124: 24: 999:the prose is clear, concise, and 852:It is not the subject of ongoing 573:images or media must satisfy the 318:Category:List-Class .NET articles 296:Category:Stub-Class .NET articles 210:project banner on its talk page: 174:9. Aren't the ratings subjective? 43:Category:.NET articles by quality 1382:appropriately understandable way 951: 885: 618: 515:, including the provision of: 394: 114:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET 485:: it is not subject to ongoing 259:Category:GA-Class .NET articles 225:Category:FA-Class .NET articles 164:section for assessment requests 144:section for assessment requests 1080:could reasonably be challenged 411:WP:Featured article candidates 276:Category:B-Class .NET articles 242:Category:A-Class .NET articles 1: 1215:valid non-free use rationales 830:Bulleted and unbulleted lists 920:WikiProject Military history 755:and its supplementary pages. 185:main project discussion page 120:5. How do I rate an article? 1484:A useful picture or graphic 972:WP:Good article nominations 702:if they contain any of the 635:WP:Featured list candidates 563:acceptable copyright status 109:4. Who can assess articles? 70:Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 program 2136: 1575:List of literary movements 1062:the layout style guideline 916:featured article candidate 433:policies regarding content 2090: 2082: 2070: 1599: 1594: 826:accessible to all readers 719:content-forking guideline 696:sourced where they appear 629:The article has attained 422:featured article criteria 405:The article has attained 387: 384: 381: 378: 375: 1557:Meets the criteria of a 1503:Providing references to 1260:Discovery of the neutron 2120:WikiProject assessments 1313:likely to be challenged 1233:to the topic, and have 807:are labeled accordingly 717:; does not violate the 477:fairly and without bias 192:Assessment instructions 169:assessment instructions 162:You can list it in the 134:assessment instructions 1541:Lineage (anthropology) 1517:(as of September 2014) 1478:More detailed criteria 1438:More detailed criteria 1291:More detailed criteria 1286:good article standards 977:More detailed criteria 902:The article meets the 899:More detailed criteria 838:alternative (alt) text 646:featured list criteria 643:The article meets the 640:More detailed criteria 579:be labeled accordingly 504:too-close paraphrasing 419:The article meets the 416:More detailed criteria 154:peer review department 57:general assessment FAQ 1546:(as of December 2014) 1119:Broad in its coverage 1011:it complies with the 968:good article criteria 822:uses proper formating 751:It complies with the 529:appropriate structure 461:against high-quality 28:assessment department 1419:(as of January 2024) 1103:copyright violations 1091:no original research 1051:no original research 565:. Images follow the 539:consistent citations 475:: it presents views 1299:suitably referenced 1172:or content dispute. 1078:. All content that 939:Battle of Nam River 698:, and they provide 694:(b) statements are 667:It has an engaging 385:Editing suggestions 382:Reader's experience 1322:citation templates 1276:The article meets 1265:(as of April 2019) 1211:copyright statuses 1182:, if possible, by 1033:list incorporation 962:The article meets 679:Comprehensiveness. 591:where appropriate. 294:(adds articles to 284:(adds articles to 274:(adds articles to 257:(adds articles to 240:(adds articles to 223:(adds articles to 112:Any member of the 2098: 2097: 1580: 1579: 1563:set index article 1464:(as of June 2018) 1235:suitable captions 1217:are provided for 1128:it addresses the 944:(as of June 2014) 715:stand-alone lists 611:(as of June 2018) 467:where appropriate 231:featured articles 200:parameter in the 92:3. Someone put a 2127: 2087: 2078: 2072:WikiWork factors 1587: 1559:stand-alone list 1547: 1543: 1518: 1514: 1505:reliable sources 1465: 1461: 1420: 1416: 1407:style guidelines 1331: 1309:reliable sources 1303:inline citations 1282:B-Class criteria 1266: 1262: 1253:featured article 1239: 1238: 1223: 1222: 1219:non-free content 1200: 1199: 1174: 1173: 1160: 1159: 1146: 1145: 1134: 1133: 1123: 1122: 1111: 1110: 1095: 1094: 1084: 1083: 1072:reliable sources 1066: 1065: 1055: 1054: 1037: 1036: 1005: 1004: 994: 993: 956: 955: 954: 945: 941: 905:A-Class criteria 890: 889: 879: 878:(as of May 2018) 875: 858: 857: 842: 841: 811: 810: 793:, with succinct 776: 775: 757: 756: 743: 742: 723: 722: 708: 707: 700:inline citations 689: 688: 682: 681: 673: 672: 659: 658: 623: 622: 612: 608: 567:image use policy 533:section headings 513:style guidelines 463:reliable sources 429:featured article 407:featured article 399: 398: 373: 366: 359: 352: 209: 203: 101: 95: 88: 82: 32:WikiProject .NET 2135: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2110: 2109: 2085: 2076: 1585: 1545: 1539: 1516: 1510: 1497: 1496: 1479: 1463: 1457: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1418: 1412: 1403:Manual of Style 1394: 1393: 1390:where possible. 1364:Manual of Style 1340:A-Class article 1325: 1297:The article is 1292: 1264: 1258: 1245: 1244: 1228: 1227: 1204: 1203: 1178: 1177: 1164: 1163: 1152: 1151: 1139: 1138: 1127: 1126: 1117: 1116: 1101:it contains no 1100: 1099: 1088: 1087: 1070: 1069: 1059: 1058: 1043: 1042: 1015:guidelines for 1013:Manual of Style 1010: 1009: 998: 997: 988: 987: 978: 943: 937: 924: 923: 900: 877: 871: 862: 861: 848: 847: 815: 814: 780: 779: 761: 760: 753:Manual of Style 747: 746: 729: 728: 712: 711: 693: 692: 686: 685: 677: 676: 663: 662: 653: 652: 641: 610: 604: 595: 594: 511:It follows the 493:compliant with 455:well-researched 417: 371: 370: 341: 214: 207: 201: 194: 99: 93: 86: 80: 51: 26:Welcome to the 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2133: 2131: 2123: 2122: 2112: 2111: 2108: 2107: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2089: 2081: 2068: 2067: 2060: 2053: 2046: 2039: 2032: 2025: 2018: 2012: 2011: 2004: 1999: 1994: 1989: 1984: 1979: 1974: 1968: 1967: 1960: 1958: 1953: 1951: 1949: 1947: 1945: 1937: 1936: 1929: 1927: 1922: 1917: 1912: 1907: 1905: 1897: 1896: 1889: 1887: 1882: 1880: 1878: 1876: 1874: 1866: 1865: 1858: 1856: 1851: 1849: 1847: 1845: 1843: 1835: 1834: 1827: 1825: 1823: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1809: 1801: 1800: 1793: 1791: 1789: 1784: 1779: 1774: 1772: 1764: 1763: 1756: 1751: 1749: 1744: 1739: 1734: 1729: 1721: 1720: 1713: 1708: 1706: 1701: 1696: 1691: 1689: 1681: 1680: 1673: 1671: 1669: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1641: 1640: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1620: 1615: 1610: 1604: 1603: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1584: 1583:Current status 1581: 1578: 1577: 1572: 1569: 1566: 1555: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1526: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1508: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1491: 1488: 1485: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1455: 1448: 1445: 1440: 1437: 1436: 1428: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1410: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1377: 1367: 1353: 1343: 1333: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1274: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1256: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1225: 1175: 1161: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1136: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1097: 1085: 1067: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1025:words to watch 1007: 979: 976: 975: 960: 947: 946: 942: 935: 932:WP:Peer review 928: 925: 909: 901: 898: 897: 894: 881: 880: 876: 869: 866: 863: 860: 859: 845: 844: 843: 812: 791:usage policies 777: 764:Visual appeal. 744: 726: 725: 724: 709: 690: 674: 660: 642: 639: 638: 627: 614: 613: 609: 602: 599: 596: 593: 592: 582: 548: 547: 546: 543:citing sources 536: 526: 509: 508: 507: 490: 480: 470: 452: 446: 418: 415: 414: 403: 390: 389: 386: 383: 380: 377: 369: 368: 361: 354: 346: 342: 340: 337: 322: 321: 308: 306: 305: 299: 289: 279: 269: 252: 248:A-Class review 235: 212: 193: 190: 189: 188: 181: 178: 175: 172: 160: 157: 150: 147: 140: 137: 121: 118: 110: 107: 103: 90: 77: 74: 66: 62: 61: 50: 47: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2132: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2115: 2106: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2094: 2088: 2079: 2073: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2031: 2030: 2026: 2024: 2023: 2019: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2010: 2009: 2005: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1993: 1990: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1980: 1978: 1975: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1959: 1957: 1954: 1952: 1950: 1948: 1946: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1928: 1926: 1923: 1921: 1918: 1916: 1913: 1911: 1908: 1906: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1890: 1888: 1886: 1883: 1881: 1879: 1877: 1875: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1859: 1857: 1855: 1852: 1850: 1848: 1846: 1844: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1832: 1828: 1826: 1824: 1822: 1820: 1817: 1815: 1812: 1810: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1792: 1790: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1780: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1755: 1752: 1750: 1748: 1745: 1743: 1740: 1738: 1735: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1722: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1712: 1709: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1700: 1697: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1672: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1629: 1624: 1619: 1614: 1609: 1605: 1602: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1582: 1576: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1513: 1509: 1506: 1502: 1499: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1482: 1474: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1460: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1446: 1434: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1423: 1415: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1399: 1396: 1389: 1385: 1383: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1354: 1351: 1347: 1344: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1329: 1323: 1319: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1304: 1300: 1295: 1294: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1273: 1270: 1269: 1261: 1257: 1254: 1250: 1247: 1236: 1232: 1226: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1156: 1150: 1143: 1142:summary style 1137: 1132:of the topic; 1131: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1115: 1108: 1104: 1098: 1092: 1086: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1041: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1017:lead sections 1014: 1008: 1002: 996: 995: 991: 986: 985: 983: 973: 969: 965: 961: 959: 949: 948: 940: 936: 933: 929: 926: 921: 917: 913: 907: 906: 895: 893: 888: 883: 882: 874: 870: 867: 864: 855: 851: 846: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 818:Accessibility 813: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 778: 773: 769: 765: 759: 758: 754: 750: 745: 740: 737:headings and 736: 732: 727: 720: 716: 710: 705: 701: 697: 691: 684: 683: 680: 675: 670: 666: 661: 656: 651: 650: 648: 647: 636: 632: 631:featured list 628: 626: 621: 616: 615: 607: 603: 600: 597: 590: 589:summary style 586: 583: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 549: 544: 540: 537: 534: 530: 527: 524: 520: 517: 516: 514: 510: 505: 501: 497: 496: 491: 488: 484: 481: 478: 474: 471: 468: 464: 460: 456: 453: 450: 449:comprehensive 447: 444: 441: 440: 438: 437: 436: 434: 430: 424: 423: 412: 408: 404: 402: 397: 392: 391: 374: 367: 362: 360: 355: 353: 348: 347: 345: 339:Quality scale 338: 336: 334: 329: 327: 326:featured list 319: 315: 312: 311: 310: 303: 300: 297: 293: 290: 287: 283: 280: 277: 273: 270: 267: 266: 265:good articles 260: 256: 253: 250: 249: 243: 239: 236: 233: 232: 226: 222: 219: 218: 217: 211: 206: 199: 191: 186: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 165: 161: 158: 155: 151: 148: 145: 141: 138: 135: 130: 126: 125:quality scale 122: 119: 115: 111: 108: 104: 98: 91: 85: 78: 75: 71: 67: 64: 63: 60: 58: 55:See also the 53: 52: 48: 46: 44: 39: 37: 33: 29: 19: 2099: 2092: 2084: 2071: 2062: 2055: 2048: 2041: 2034: 2027: 2020: 2015: 2006: 1971: 1962: 1940: 1931: 1900: 1891: 1869: 1860: 1838: 1829: 1804: 1795: 1767: 1758: 1724: 1715: 1684: 1675: 1644: 1637: 1600: 1595: 1536:significant. 1532:significant. 1405:and related 1379: 1369: 1355: 1350:lead section 1345: 1335: 1332:is optional. 1317:<ref: --> 1296: 1277: 1183: 1179: 1165: 1153: 1130:main aspects 1118: 1089:it contains 1076:cited inline 1050: 1044: 990:Well-written 989: 982:good article 963: 903: 849: 817: 783:Media files. 782: 763: 748: 730: 678: 664: 654: 644: 584: 550: 538: 528: 523:lead section 521:: a concise 518: 498:and free of 492: 482: 472: 454: 448: 443:well-written 442: 426: 420: 343: 330: 323: 313: 307: 301: 291: 281: 271: 262: 254: 245: 237: 228: 220: 215: 197: 195: 129:instructions 54: 40: 27: 25: 1209:with their 1180:Illustrated 741:facilities. 1601:Importance 1414:Psychology 1229:media are 1205:media are 1107:plagiarism 1046:Verifiable 850:Stability. 739:table sort 731:Structure. 500:plagiarism 459:verifiable 123:Check the 1454:problems. 934:may help. 854:edit wars 606:Cleopatra 487:edit wars 439:It is: 117:disputes. 106:article). 79:Just add 38:program. 2114:Category 1972:Assessed 1942:Template 1902:Redirect 1840:Category 1328:cite web 1324:such as 1231:relevant 1186:such as 1170:edit war 799:Non-free 795:captions 571:Non-free 559:captions 388:Example 379:Criteria 1871:Project 1596:Quality 1452:cleanup 1433:cleanup 1374:infobox 1307:It has 1301:, with 1280:of the 1155:Neutral 1029:fiction 966:of the 785:It has 735:section 585:Length. 553:It has 473:neutral 30:of the 1362:. The 1213:, and 1207:tagged 1188:images 1166:Stable 1031:, and 1021:layout 834:tables 824:to be 787:images 772:colour 770:, and 768:tables 749:Style. 655:Prose. 555:images 551:Media. 519:a lead 483:stable 146:below. 73:whole. 36:WP:1.0 2016:Total 1726:Start 1638:Total 1471:Start 1442:flow. 1196:audio 1194:, or 1192:video 1184:media 1049:with 820:. It 665:Lead. 535:; and 376:Class 282:Start 198:class 16:< 2093:4.83 2091:Ω = 2083:ω = 1806:List 1769:Stub 1613:High 1553:List 1524:Stub 1512:Ball 1459:Wing 1320:and 1318:tags 1074:are 984:is: 832:and 816:(c) 805:and 781:(b) 762:(a) 669:lead 577:and 561:and 314:List 292:Stub 152:The 2086:584 2064:167 2008:167 1633:??? 1623:Low 1618:Mid 1608:Top 1561:or 1278:all 1224:and 1135:and 1105:or 1096:and 1006:and 964:all 502:or 49:FAQ 2116:: 2080:) 2050:40 2043:59 2036:40 2029:22 1997:40 1992:59 1987:40 1982:22 1862:32 1854:32 1797:20 1787:13 1760:72 1747:35 1742:26 1717:17 1677:12 1628:NA 1330:}} 1326:{{ 1190:, 1144:). 1027:, 1023:, 1019:, 980:A 958:GA 922:). 828:. 797:. 649:: 625:FL 569:. 427:A 425:: 401:FA 302:NA 261:; 255:GA 244:; 227:; 221:FA 208:}} 202:{{ 100:}} 94:{{ 87:}} 81:{{ 45:. 2077:? 2074:( 2057:3 2022:3 2002:3 1977:3 1964:3 1956:3 1933:5 1925:2 1920:1 1915:1 1910:1 1893:3 1885:3 1831:3 1819:2 1814:1 1782:5 1777:2 1754:2 1737:8 1732:1 1711:1 1704:8 1699:4 1694:4 1686:C 1667:2 1662:2 1657:6 1652:2 1646:B 1435:. 1426:C 1409:. 1384:. 1305:. 1288:. 1272:B 1237:. 1221:; 1198:: 1121:: 1109:. 1093:; 1064:; 1053:: 1035:. 992:: 974:. 908:: 892:A 840:. 809:. 706:. 637:. 581:. 506:. 479:; 469:; 413:. 365:e 358:t 351:v 320:) 298:) 288:) 278:) 272:B 268:) 251:) 238:A 234:) 187:. 171:. 136:. 59:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET
WikiProject .NET
WP:1.0
Category:.NET articles by quality
general assessment FAQ
Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 program
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET/template
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET/template
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET
quality scale
instructions
assessment instructions
section for assessment requests
peer review department
section for assessment requests
assessment instructions
main project discussion page
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject .NET/template
Category:FA-Class .NET articles
featured articles
Category:A-Class .NET articles
A-Class review
Category:GA-Class .NET articles
good articles
Category:B-Class .NET articles
Category:Start-Class .NET articles
Category:Stub-Class .NET articles
Category:List-Class .NET articles
featured list
Category:Unassessed-Class .NET articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑