71:
It would seem to me that such a statement basically whets the reader's appetite and then leaves it unsatisfied. Maybe changing the phrasing to indicate that it has agreements with several countries (number unspecified) and then listing those in which it operates, or mentioning explicitly all the countries with which it does have agreements, might be the way to go.
70:
Two comments come to mind. One, the history section could probably be expanded, and a bit clearer indication of what the corporate structure of the firm has might be good as well. Secondly, I wonder about the purpose in saying that the company has contracts with 42 countries, but not mentioning them.
105:
The article is very well referenced - one of the best I have seen. This is one of my big criticisms of airline articles and this is exemplary. I see nothing wrong with the destination list - it is of normal style and standard. The history section is a wee bit light and could be expanded (if someone
115:
This is a great article, but I am not sure it is yet ready to be a
Knowledge FA collaboration. There are a lot of references and important information in the article, but when reading through it, it seem to stand out, or be at FA status YET. Perhaps with some more time and edits, this article will
92:
Thanks for your comments. Could you elaborate on what needs changing. I thought it looked like all the other articles but I may be missing something obvious. Should the list for
Bangladesh be under South Asia or should it remain at the top since that is the airlines home country? Thanks. →
125:
How about making necessary corrections and taking a step to become A-class on this project? When that is done, I am hoping that enough people will be interested to collaborate to get it to an FA status, eventually. Cheers.
140:
21:
148:
130:
120:
110:
98:
87:
75:
64:
27:
17:
158:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
54:
72:
60:
The article looks good enough to become a
Knowledge FA collaboration. But, we could have it here first?
127:
61:
82:
The article is well referenced; however the destination list appears to be a bit clumsy. --:
117:
83:
107:
144:
94:
106:
had the info). Otherwise it sets a very high standard. More please
28:
Knowledge:WikiProject
Aviation/Assessment/Biman Bangladesh Airlines
47:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
116:become that much better, and really stand out.
8:
7:
41:The following discussion is closed.
35:
154:The discussion above is closed.
18:Knowledge:WikiProject Aviation
1:
149:16:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
173:
55:Biman Bangladesh Airlines
156:Please do not modify it.
131:03:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
121:17:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
111:17:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
99:16:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
88:15:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
76:14:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
65:18:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
44:Please do not modify it.
26:(Redirected from
164:
46:
31:
172:
171:
167:
166:
165:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
58:
51:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
170:
168:
153:
152:
151:
139:Submitted for
136:
135:
134:
133:
113:
103:
102:
101:
79:
78:
57:
52:
50:
49:
37:
36:
34:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
169:
157:
150:
146:
142:
138:
137:
132:
129:
124:
123:
122:
119:
114:
112:
109:
104:
100:
96:
91:
90:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
69:
68:
67:
66:
63:
56:
53:
48:
45:
39:
38:
29:
23:
19:
155:
128:Aditya Kabir
62:Aditya Kabir
59:
43:
40:
141:Peer Review
73:John Carter
22:Peer review
118:Greenboxed
84:Raphaelmak
20: |
108:Ardfern
16:<
86::
147:—
145:AA
143:→
97:—
95:AA
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.