Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Aztec/Assessment - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

1121: 897: 1454: 1388: 471:
If currently unassessed (or when adding the project banner anew), determine what its class and importance assessment rating should be, using your judgement and the criteria given here. Try to be as frank as possible in the assessment, the aim here is to appropriately identify articles needing later
373:
It is expected that this rating and assessment scheme will require periodic and iterative maintenance, as new articles are created or identified, and existing articles are progressively improved (or, hopefully much rarer, demoted), requiring the status to be reassessed (indicated by changing the
1415:. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a 241:
The primary purpose of this rating and assessment scheme is to provide editors with a sub-categorised survey of the current status of Aztec-related articles, which can then be used to prioritise the overall workload and highlight articles needing improvements at various stages.
426:
These parameters flag the article according to the values chosen (which then appear on the project banner), and also assign the article to a corresponding category. The possible values of these parameters and guidance criteria on which value to choose are detailed below: see
1942:
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or
377:
Of course, anyone is free to edit any of the articles they choose without regard to priority, however it is hoped that this will provide some basis for a more methodical approach to the longer-term overall improvement of content and coverage in the field.
481:
If the article already has a rating, but you disagree or the article has subsequently been edited by you or someone else so that its overall quality has changed (hopefully for the better!), then you can update the parameter yourself to reflect its new
485:
Since we may (naturally enough) not be the most objective assessors of one's own work, it might be an idea in these or other unclear cases to invite another party to give the assessment. This can be done by adding the parameter/value combination
2036:
Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is
1188:(a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. 1931:
The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
1901:
A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the
70: 416:(indicates an assessment of the relative priority or significance of the particular article to general knowledge of Aztec-specific and Mesoamerican topics). Usage summary (note the parameters are in lowercase): 1840: 1420: 2032:
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are
602:
Mid-priority articles on more specialised (sub-)topics; possibly more detailed coverage of topics summarised in "key" articles, and as such their omission would not significantly impair general understanding
475:
Add the selected parameter values to the project banner template call, per the specified syntax. Once previewed/saved, you should see the values updated in the banner and the appropriate categories assigned.
61: 1334: 1366:
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
288: 478:
If in doubt as to the appropriate class or importance level, you can either leave the value unassigned for now (ie omit the parameters), and/or consult with another project member to decide.
1583:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); 1397:
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
1580: 268:
For example, higher-priority articles (those most essential to any encyclopaedia) in need of most work (i.e. lower quality) can be readily identified for attention and collaboration.
1882: 1501: 2008:
should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
1529: 1307: 673: 282: 1782: 1405: 95: 80: 401:
project banner, which is affixed to the talk pages of in-scope articles. Note that there are some other (optional) parameters to the project banner as well, see
1715: 932:
exemplifies Knowledge (XXG)'s very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the
1533: 1525: 1369:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
1330: 1322: 1102:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
251:-related articles, and articles in the Aztec scheme also appear in the corresponding categories of the parent Mesoamerica scheme. See the corresponding 1850: 1799: 1517: 1079: 1023: 864: 1416: 1338: 911: 578:
High-priority topics and needed subtopics of "key" articles, often with a broad scope; needed to complement any general understanding of the field
1749:
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.
670: 666:, intended as a point-in-time assessment of its overall "quality" - relative to the criteria given in the quality scale which is detailed below. 370:)) runs periodically (scheduled daily, about 0300hrs UTC) which compiles a variety of statistics and log data, which can then later be analysed. 276: 1907: 1874: 1860: 1303: 1075: 922: 840:
These are the detailed criteria per class/quality division, following the assessment scheme used by the Knowledge (XXG) V1.0 Editorial team.
622:
While still notable, these are highly-specialised or even obscure, not essential for understanding the wider picture ("nice to have" articles)
271:
There will be a number of secondary benefits from the scheme, such as being able to track which kinds and topics of articles are 'neglected'.
1735: 1472: 1135: 1059: 1813: 247: 491: 194: 1982:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
1521: 1146: 1786: 1655: 1468: 1428:
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.
977: 1603: 1591: 649: 184: 468:
if not already there. (Note this also applies to new articles you may create, ie you can add the banner and the rating as you go).
1887:
It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and
1707: 1412: 2063: 1822: 1222:, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. 1004: 590: 169: 2059: 1753: 929: 907: 628: 610: 566: 179: 174: 164: 17: 2066:, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. 526: 158: 1971: 367: 2005: 1898:
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
1809: 1719: 1572: 1299: 1291: 1200: 1071: 1067: 933: 786: 265:
have been separately defined to make it easier for the WP:AZTEC team to work with articles within that project's scope.
129: 87: 2053: 2024: 857: 829: 801: 691: 144: 134: 103: 1903: 1864: 1803: 1576: 1513: 1253: 1219: 1013: 990:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
816: 756: 722: 139: 119: 109: 1131: 1043: 771: 737: 245:
This article rating and assessment scheme for Aztec-related articles forms a subset of the overall rating scheme for
124: 114: 2075: 1458: 1125: 901: 1711: 1642: 1546: 1482: 1089: 1063: 963: 959: 1926: 1772: 1392: 1670: 1630: 1169: 987: 967: 1357:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
896: 1432: 1120: 850: 1976:
An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
1607: 1000: 995: 813:
Not applicable; ie for miscellaneous pages such as disambiguation pages, which do not require an assessment
402: 317: 1948:
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
253: 353:
for details. Assigning a rating will automatically place the article in an appropriate rating category.
1354: 1295: 27: 347:
are assigned manually by WP:AZTEC (or WP:MESO) project members (or other interested parties)– see the
1239: 1952: 1933: 1387: 1272: 2072:
Lists should be lists of live links to Knowledge (XXG) articles, appropriately named and organized.
2069:
There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
1785:. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach 1692: 1688: 1287: 1204: 1196: 1055: 1731: 1837:
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
1696: 222:. In this scheme, Aztec-related articles ('article' here also includes lists) may be assigned: 1828: 1326: 1042:: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see 458: 394: 361: 315:, which is placed on the corresponding talk pages of in-scope Aztec-related articles. See the 308: 1562: 1561:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
1026:
that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
303:
ratings are recorded by setting appropriate values to the parameters of the Project banner,
1859:
The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be
1843:, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. 1215: 1431:
Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.
1099:
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
585: 750: 716: 1659:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 648:
parameter is not yet set, or contains an invalid value, the article will be assigned to
1994:
Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
1817: 581: 1411:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in
958:: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are 48: 1235: 1033: 560: 357: 1752:
Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing
1419:. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. 1088:
It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses
494:. You can also request reassessments/second opinions at the main discussion forum. 490:
to the project banner, which will automatically assign the article in question to
209: 1853:
and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
96:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Aztec articles by quality statistics
2029:
A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.
1888: 1268: 1046:
for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
605: 389:
An article's assessment is recorded via the use of certain parameters of the
1290:
and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Knowledge (XXG)'s
1877:
etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
952:: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; 1849:
Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a
1669:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 1641:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
1172:
that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
1756:
on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
412:(indicates an assessment of the article's current overall quality) and 330:
for guideline criteria for rating an article by class/quality. See the
1134:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
910:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
274:
This assessment and rating scheme follows the precepts adopted by the
336:
for guideline criteria for rating an article by importance/priority.
472:
improvement and there's nothing to be gained by "over-ranking" them.
55:(NB: Listing, Log & Stats are updated on a daily basis by a bot) 936:
for all Knowledge (XXG) articles, it has the following attributes.
2001:
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.
1951:
Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve
1816:
is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of
556: 214: 1214:(c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for 1873:
Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an
1839:
It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an
1471:, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from 218:
civilization and history, which is monitored and maintained by
1337:
are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize
1871:
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
1205:
four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations
1032:: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical 454:
Locate an in-scope Aztec-related article (or list), add the
321:
for details on these and other parameters which can be set.
669:
This quality scale follows the definitions employed at the
233:
a particular rating which indicates an assessment of their
226:
a particular rating which indicates an assessment of their
1988:
Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
2041: 2012: 1959: 1914: 1812:, and any important or controversial material which is 1760: 1439: 1373: 1106: 946:: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; 685: 520: 501:
categories for improvement opportunities, and also the
35: 1991:
A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
640:
parameter is not used if an article's class is set to
683:
parameter (they should be entered exactly as given):
518:
parameter (they should be entered exactly as given):
63:
Current detailed listing of Aztec articles by quality
1234:
It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful,
828:has not yet been provided are listed by default in 257:for details. The subsets of Aztec-related articles 1275:; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. 1267:It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, 1058:and other media, where appropriate, with succinct 660:Each article may also be assigned to a particular 492:Category:Mesoamerica articles needing reassessment 1502:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 497:On an ongoing basis, you can patrol the various 289:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Work via Wikiprojects 208:has been implemented for the specific subset of 1889:technical terms should be explained or avoided 1374:List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events 1304:criteria for the inclusion of non-free content 1158:It features professional standards of writing. 408:The two parameters used for this exercise are 858: 650:Category:Unassigned-importance Aztec articles 51:WP:AZTEC article rating and assessment scheme 8: 644:, and may be omitted in those cases. If the 1076:criteria for inclusion of non-free content 873: 865: 851: 845:WikiProject article quality grading scheme 679:The following values may be used for the 514:The following values may be used for the 1867:does not need to be followed rigorously. 894: 553:"Key" articles, considered indispensable 356:Once assigned, behind the scenes a bot ( 1881:The article presents its content in an 1857:The article is reasonably well-written. 1385: 421:{{WP Aztec|class=??? |importance=??? }} 966:and are supported by inline citations 1118: 527:Category:Aztec articles by importance 429: 332: 283:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment 254:WP:MESO article rating and assessment 7: 1861:of the standard of featured articles 1847:The article has a defined structure. 1453: 1451: 450:The general workflow is as follows: 237:(priority or relative significance). 206:article rating and assessment scheme 45:Article rating and assessment scheme 1504:; spelling and grammar are correct; 1413:Knowledge (XXG):Article development 1302:images and other media satisfy the 996:Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy 830:Category:Unassessed Aztec articles 692:Category:Aztec articles by quality 439: 326: 24: 1500:the prose is clear, concise, and 1353:It is not the subject of ongoing 1074:images or media must satisfy the 349: 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Aztec 1883:appropriately understandable way 1452: 1386: 1119: 1016:, including the provision of: 895: 986:: it is not subject to ongoing 1581:could reasonably be challenged 912:WP:Featured article candidates 591:High-importance Aztec articles 1: 1716:valid non-free use rationales 1331:Bulleted and unbulleted lists 715:Articles which are currently 629:Low-importance Aztec articles 611:Mid-importance Aztec articles 567:Top-importance Aztec articles 99: 1421:WikiProject Military history 1256:and its supplementary pages. 671:Version 1.0 Editorial Team's 1985:A useful picture or graphic 1473:WP:Good article nominations 1203:if they contain any of the 1136:WP:Featured list candidates 1064:acceptable copyright status 824:Articles for which a valid 523:Importance parameter values 72:Daily log of status changes 2095: 2076:List of literary movements 1563:the layout style guideline 1417:featured article candidate 934:policies regarding content 836:Detailed criteria by class 787:Start-Class Aztec articles 277:Version 1.0 Editorial Team 195:Rating reassessment needed 25: 1327:accessible to all readers 1220:content-forking guideline 1197:sourced where they appear 1130:The article has attained 923:featured article criteria 906:The article has attained 888: 885: 882: 879: 876: 802:Stub-Class Aztec articles 704: 701: 698: 542: 539: 536: 533: 505:cats for new assessments. 212:articles which relate to 85: 78: 69: 60: 2058:Meets the criteria of a 2004:Providing references to 1761:Discovery of the neutron 749:Articles with a current 88:Rated article Categories 1814:likely to be challenged 1734:to the topic, and have 1308:are labeled accordingly 1218:; does not violate the 978:fairly and without bias 817:Non-article Aztec pages 757:GA-Class Aztec articles 723:FA-Class Aztec articles 248:WikiProject Mesoamerica 2042:Lineage (anthropology) 2018:(as of September 2014) 1979:More detailed criteria 1939:More detailed criteria 1792:More detailed criteria 1787:good article standards 1478:More detailed criteria 1403:The article meets the 1400:More detailed criteria 1339:alternative (alt) text 1147:featured list criteria 1144:The article meets the 1141:More detailed criteria 1080:be labeled accordingly 1005:too-close paraphrasing 920:The article meets the 917:More detailed criteria 772:B-Class Aztec articles 738:A-Class Aztec articles 688:Class parameter values 464:project banner to its 405:for full description. 403:template talk:WP Aztec 230:(overall quality), and 2047:(as of December 2014) 1620:Broad in its coverage 1512:it complies with the 1469:good article criteria 1323:uses proper formating 1252:It complies with the 1030:appropriate structure 962:against high-quality 783:Start-class articles; 318:template instructions 1920:(as of January 2024) 1604:copyright violations 1592:no original research 1552:no original research 1066:. Images follow the 1040:consistent citations 976:: it presents views 798:Stub-class articles; 374:parameter value). 1800:suitably referenced 1673:or content dispute. 1579:. All content that 1440:Battle of Nam River 1199:, and they provide 1195:(b) statements are 1168:It has an engaging 886:Editing suggestions 883:Reader's experience 695: 530: 350:Rating instructions 339:The assessments of 57: 1823:citation templates 1777:The article meets 1766:(as of April 2019) 1712:copyright statuses 1683:, if possible, by 1534:list incorporation 1463:The article meets 1180:Comprehensiveness. 1092:where appropriate. 686: 521: 81:Current Statistics 49: 2081: 2080: 2064:set index article 1965:(as of June 2018) 1736:suitable captions 1718:are provided for 1629:it addresses the 1445:(as of June 2014) 1216:stand-alone lists 1112:(as of June 2018) 968:where appropriate 822: 821: 768:B-class articles; 734:A-class articles; 674:assessment system 634: 633: 220:WikiProject Aztec 202: 201: 159:all by importance 140:Non-article Class 2086: 2060:stand-alone list 2048: 2044: 2019: 2015: 2006:reliable sources 1966: 1962: 1921: 1917: 1908:style guidelines 1832: 1810:reliable sources 1804:inline citations 1783:B-Class criteria 1767: 1763: 1754:featured article 1740: 1739: 1724: 1723: 1720:non-free content 1701: 1700: 1675: 1674: 1661: 1660: 1647: 1646: 1635: 1634: 1624: 1623: 1612: 1611: 1596: 1595: 1585: 1584: 1573:reliable sources 1567: 1566: 1556: 1555: 1538: 1537: 1506: 1505: 1495: 1494: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1446: 1442: 1406:A-Class criteria 1391: 1390: 1380: 1379:(as of May 2018) 1376: 1359: 1358: 1343: 1342: 1312: 1311: 1294:, with succinct 1277: 1276: 1258: 1257: 1244: 1243: 1224: 1223: 1209: 1208: 1201:inline citations 1190: 1189: 1183: 1182: 1174: 1173: 1160: 1159: 1124: 1123: 1113: 1109: 1068:image use policy 1034:section headings 1014:style guidelines 964:reliable sources 930:featured article 908:featured article 900: 899: 874: 867: 860: 853: 696: 531: 510:Importance scale 463: 457: 430:Importance scale 399: 393: 333:Importance scale 313: 307: 58: 38: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2046: 2040: 2017: 2011: 1998: 1997: 1980: 1964: 1958: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1919: 1913: 1904:Manual of Style 1895: 1894: 1891:where possible. 1865:Manual of Style 1841:A-Class article 1826: 1798:The article is 1793: 1765: 1759: 1746: 1745: 1729: 1728: 1705: 1704: 1679: 1678: 1665: 1664: 1653: 1652: 1640: 1639: 1628: 1627: 1618: 1617: 1602:it contains no 1601: 1600: 1589: 1588: 1571: 1570: 1560: 1559: 1544: 1543: 1516:guidelines for 1514:Manual of Style 1511: 1510: 1499: 1498: 1489: 1488: 1479: 1444: 1438: 1425: 1424: 1401: 1378: 1372: 1363: 1362: 1349: 1348: 1316: 1315: 1281: 1280: 1262: 1261: 1254:Manual of Style 1248: 1247: 1230: 1229: 1213: 1212: 1194: 1193: 1187: 1186: 1178: 1177: 1164: 1163: 1154: 1153: 1142: 1111: 1105: 1096: 1095: 1012:It follows the 994:compliant with 956:well-researched 918: 872: 871: 838: 717:Featured status 658: 586:Aztec mythology 512: 461: 455: 397: 391: 387: 311: 305: 47: 42: 41: 34: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2092: 2090: 2079: 2078: 2073: 2070: 2067: 2056: 2050: 2049: 2045: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2021: 2020: 2016: 2009: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1989: 1986: 1981: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1956: 1949: 1946: 1941: 1938: 1937: 1929: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1911: 1899: 1896: 1893: 1892: 1878: 1868: 1854: 1844: 1834: 1794: 1791: 1790: 1775: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1757: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1726: 1676: 1662: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1637: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1598: 1586: 1568: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1526:words to watch 1508: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1461: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1436: 1433:WP:Peer review 1429: 1426: 1410: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1370: 1367: 1364: 1361: 1360: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1313: 1292:usage policies 1278: 1265:Visual appeal. 1245: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1210: 1191: 1175: 1161: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1128: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1083: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1044:citing sources 1037: 1027: 1010: 1009: 1008: 991: 981: 971: 953: 947: 919: 916: 915: 904: 891: 890: 887: 884: 881: 878: 870: 869: 862: 855: 847: 843: 842: 837: 834: 820: 819: 814: 811: 805: 804: 799: 796: 790: 789: 784: 781: 775: 774: 769: 766: 760: 759: 754: 747: 741: 740: 735: 732: 726: 725: 720: 713: 707: 706: 703: 700: 657: 654: 632: 631: 626: 623: 620: 614: 613: 608: 603: 600: 594: 593: 588: 584: 582:Aztec calendar 579: 576: 570: 569: 564: 563: 559: 554: 551: 545: 544: 541: 538: 535: 511: 508: 507: 506: 495: 483: 479: 476: 473: 469: 437:parameter and 424: 423: 386: 383: 381: 239: 238: 231: 200: 199: 192: 190: 189: 188: 187: 182: 177: 172: 167: 153: 152: 150: 149: 148: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 122: 117: 112: 104:all by quality 98: 92: 91: 84: 76: 75: 67: 66: 53: 46: 43: 40: 39: 31: 26: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2091: 2077: 2074: 2071: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2028: 2026: 2023: 2022: 2014: 2010: 2007: 2003: 2000: 1993: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1983: 1975: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1961: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1947: 1935: 1930: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1916: 1912: 1909: 1905: 1900: 1897: 1890: 1886: 1884: 1879: 1876: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1852: 1848: 1845: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1830: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1805: 1801: 1796: 1795: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1737: 1733: 1727: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1668: 1663: 1658: 1657: 1651: 1644: 1643:summary style 1638: 1633:of the topic; 1632: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1616: 1609: 1605: 1599: 1593: 1587: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1542: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518:lead sections 1515: 1509: 1503: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1487: 1486: 1484: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1460: 1450: 1449: 1441: 1437: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1408: 1407: 1396: 1394: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1356: 1352: 1347: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1319:Accessibility 1314: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1279: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1260: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1238:headings and 1237: 1233: 1228: 1221: 1217: 1211: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1192: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1151: 1149: 1148: 1137: 1133: 1132:featured list 1129: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1116: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1091: 1090:summary style 1087: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1045: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1015: 1011: 1006: 1002: 998: 997: 992: 989: 985: 982: 979: 975: 972: 969: 965: 961: 957: 954: 951: 950:comprehensive 948: 945: 942: 941: 939: 938: 937: 935: 931: 925: 924: 913: 909: 905: 903: 898: 893: 892: 875: 868: 863: 861: 856: 854: 849: 848: 846: 841: 835: 833: 831: 827: 818: 815: 812: 810: 807: 806: 803: 800: 797: 795: 792: 791: 788: 785: 782: 780: 777: 776: 773: 770: 767: 765: 762: 761: 758: 755: 752: 748: 746: 743: 742: 739: 736: 733: 731: 728: 727: 724: 721: 718: 714: 712: 709: 708: 697: 693: 689: 684: 682: 677: 675: 672: 667: 665: 664: 656:Quality scale 655: 653: 651: 647: 643: 639: 630: 627: 624: 621: 619: 616: 615: 612: 609: 607: 604: 601: 599: 596: 595: 592: 589: 587: 583: 580: 577: 575: 572: 571: 568: 565: 562: 558: 555: 552: 550: 547: 546: 532: 528: 524: 519: 517: 509: 504: 500: 496: 493: 489: 488:|reassess=yes 484: 480: 477: 474: 470: 467: 460: 453: 452: 451: 448: 446: 442: 441: 440:Quality scale 436: 432: 431: 422: 419: 418: 417: 415: 411: 406: 404: 400: 396: 384: 382: 379: 375: 371: 369: 366: 363: 359: 354: 352: 351: 346: 342: 337: 335: 334: 329: 328: 327:Quality scale 322: 320: 319: 314: 310: 302: 298: 293: 292:for details. 291: 290: 285: 284: 279: 278: 272: 269: 266: 264: 263:by importance 260: 256: 255: 250: 249: 243: 236: 232: 229: 225: 224: 223: 221: 217: 216: 211: 207: 198: 197: 196: 186: 183: 181: 178: 176: 173: 171: 170:High-priority 168: 166: 163: 162: 161: 160: 156: 155: 154: 146: 143: 141: 138: 136: 133: 131: 128: 126: 123: 121: 118: 116: 113: 111: 108: 107: 106: 105: 101: 100: 97: 94: 93: 90: 89: 83: 82: 77: 74: 73: 68: 65: 64: 59: 56: 52: 44: 37: 36:WP:AZTEC/RATE 33: 32: 29: 19: 2037:significant. 2033:significant. 1906:and related 1880: 1870: 1856: 1851:lead section 1846: 1836: 1833:is optional. 1818:<ref: --> 1797: 1778: 1684: 1680: 1666: 1654: 1631:main aspects 1619: 1590:it contains 1577:cited inline 1551: 1545: 1491:Well-written 1490: 1483:good article 1464: 1404: 1350: 1318: 1284:Media files. 1283: 1264: 1249: 1231: 1179: 1165: 1155: 1145: 1085: 1051: 1039: 1029: 1024:lead section 1022:: a concise 1019: 999:and free of 993: 983: 973: 955: 949: 944:well-written 943: 927: 921: 844: 839: 825: 823: 808: 793: 778: 763: 751:Good article 744: 729: 710: 687: 680: 678: 668: 662: 661: 659: 645: 641: 637: 635: 617: 597: 573: 561:Tenochtitlan 548: 522: 515: 513: 502: 498: 487: 465: 449: 444: 438: 434: 428: 425: 420: 413: 409: 407: 390: 388: 385:Instructions 380: 376: 372: 364: 355: 348: 344: 340: 338: 331: 325: 323: 316: 304: 300: 296: 294: 287: 281: 275: 273: 270: 267: 262: 258: 252: 246: 244: 240: 234: 227: 219: 213: 210:Mesoamerican 205: 203: 193: 191: 180:Low-priority 175:Mid-priority 165:Top-priority 157: 151: 102: 86: 79: 71: 62: 54: 50: 1710:with their 1681:Illustrated 1242:facilities. 447:parameter. 130:Start-Class 1915:Psychology 1730:media are 1706:media are 1608:plagiarism 1547:Verifiable 1351:Stability. 1240:table sort 1232:Structure. 1001:plagiarism 960:verifiable 646:importance 638:importance 606:Tzompantli 516:importance 503:unassessed 435:importance 414:importance 345:importance 301:importance 259:by quality 235:importance 185:UNASSESSED 145:UNASSESSED 135:Stub-Class 1955:problems. 1435:may help. 1355:edit wars 1107:Cleopatra 988:edit wars 940:It is: 705:Category 625:examples? 543:Category 540:Examples 466:talk page 1829:cite web 1825:such as 1732:relevant 1687:such as 1671:edit war 1300:Non-free 1296:captions 1072:Non-free 1060:captions 889:Example 880:Criteria 719:articles 702:Meaning 537:Meaning 459:WP Aztec 443:for the 433:for the 395:WP Aztec 368:contribs 324:See the 309:WP Aztec 120:GA-Class 110:FA-Class 28:Shortcut 1953:cleanup 1934:cleanup 1875:infobox 1808:It has 1802:, with 1781:of the 1656:Neutral 1530:fiction 1467:of the 1286:It has 1236:section 1086:Length. 1054:It has 974:neutral 499:x-class 482:status. 358:Mathbot 125:B-Class 115:A-Class 1863:. The 1714:, and 1708:tagged 1689:images 1667:Stable 1532:, and 1522:layout 1335:tables 1325:to be 1288:images 1273:colour 1271:, and 1269:tables 1250:Style. 1156:Prose. 1056:images 1052:Media. 1020:a lead 984:stable 753:status 699:Value 534:Value 280:, see 1972:Start 1943:flow. 1697:audio 1695:, or 1693:video 1685:media 1550:with 1321:. It 1166:Lead. 1036:; and 877:Class 826:class 779:Start 681:class 663:class 557:Aztec 445:class 410:class 341:class 297:class 228:class 215:Aztec 16:< 2054:List 2025:Stub 2013:Ball 1960:Wing 1821:and 1819:tags 1575:are 1485:is: 1333:and 1317:(c) 1306:and 1282:(b) 1263:(a) 1170:lead 1078:and 1062:and 832:. 794:Stub 636:The 574:High 362:talk 343:and 299:and 295:The 286:and 261:and 2062:or 1779:all 1725:and 1636:and 1606:or 1597:and 1507:and 1465:all 1003:or 618:Low 598:Mid 549:Top 204:An 1831:}} 1827:{{ 1691:, 1645:). 1528:, 1524:, 1520:, 1481:A 1459:GA 1423:). 1329:. 1298:. 1150:: 1126:FL 1070:. 928:A 926:: 902:FA 809:NA 745:GA 711:FA 694:) 676:. 652:. 642:NA 529:) 462:}} 456:{{ 398:}} 392:{{ 312:}} 306:{{ 1936:. 1927:C 1910:. 1885:. 1806:. 1789:. 1773:B 1738:. 1722:; 1699:: 1622:: 1610:. 1594:; 1565:; 1554:: 1536:. 1493:: 1475:. 1409:: 1393:A 1341:. 1310:. 1207:. 1138:. 1082:. 1007:. 980:; 970:; 914:. 866:e 859:t 852:v 764:B 730:A 690:( 525:( 365:· 360:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Aztec
Shortcut
WP:AZTEC/RATE
Current detailed listing of Aztec articles by quality
Daily log of status changes
Current Statistics
Rated article Categories
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Aztec articles by quality statistics
all by quality
FA-Class
A-Class
GA-Class
B-Class
Start-Class
Stub-Class
Non-article Class
UNASSESSED
all by importance
Top-priority
High-priority
Mid-priority
Low-priority
UNASSESSED
Rating reassessment needed
Mesoamerican
Aztec
WikiProject Mesoamerica
WP:MESO article rating and assessment
Version 1.0 Editorial Team
Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.