Knowledge

:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Harriet Tubman - Knowledge

Source 📝

442:
as a properly crafted paragraph should contain a single thesis, and what you are citing is that thesis and its supporting details. I have always been under the opinion that unless a specific statement is challengable (as defined as quotes, cited opinion, statistics/data, or controversial/jarring/surprising statements) then it is still unambiguous to cite at the end of a paragraph. If someone asks for more cites, you are well within your rights to request that they tell you which statements they think needs citing. I would agree that an overcited article is preferable to an undercited article, however BOTH are inferior, in my opinion, to a
411:
end of the paragraph. If it comes from two different sources, then it is probably OK to cite both references at the end of the paragraph. The only time you should really cite after each sentance is: 1) Direct quotes 2) controversial, surpising, or jarring facts, and 3) statistics and data. Most of this article contains what I would call uncontroversial information, and so footnoting at the end of the paragraph is sufficient. You can improve readability and not reduce verifiability by moving some of these references to the end of the paragraphs.
1675:. If she rescued, as stated earlier, some seventy slaves in thirteen expeditions, then this expedition included over a third of all she rescued. I noticed here that you did not come back to the scholarly issue of numbers referred to in the lead. Given that Conrad, reffed for this incident, is an early source, perhaps he has been challenged by later biographers? Kate's note on the talk page is worth taking seriously on this, I suspect (presumably this is Kate Larsen, author of one of the biographies). 738:
in extreme secrecy, Tubman (or "Moses", as she was called) followed the North Star and – in her own words – "never lost a passenger". Rewards were posted for her capture, but historians disagree on their actual amount; estimates range from US$ 12,000 to US$ 40,000" (a brief mention of rescues and rewards would do here, I think). I would drop "70" and postpone the discussion of historical evidence until later in the article.
1579: 1479: 1365: 807: 748: 338: 253: 176: 142: 80: 853:
were calls for the emancipation of slaves (and the more southern states were being pressured by the northern ones); also she would have seen freed slaves in her own community, a phenomenon that must have put pressure on the status quo. The article addresses this as the article progresses, but perhaps something needs to be said earlier on.
737:
I'd suggest that the lead be shortened to concentrate on what she is noted for: perhaps dropping things like the abortive marriage to Tubman, and Nelson Davis and Gertie, and four different jobs in the army, and the circumstantial matter from "Aided by the Underground Railroad, traveling by night and
380:, specifically linking the same statement twice in a short space. The lead, for example, links the Underground Railroad twice. It may be OK to link a topic twice, for example if the topic appears in two very separate parts of the narrative, however in general linking it the first time is sufficient. 304:
Actually, it's not really possible to address it. I've more or less given all the information that's available – which is not much. Both Clinton and Larson explain that there's very little data available, and (probably in light of their breakup years later), Tubman didn't say much about the marriage
1429:
What I'm sensing, with this and the freeing of the father (and later of the mother), and the ability of Harriet's parents to resist a sale of their child, and the self-hiring-out of slaves, and the buying of freedoms, and the existence of the underground railroad, is that the situation was becoming
860:
It's possible that I'm taking historical context for granted, being a US resident. But I'm not quite clear on what needs to be clarified. Tubman's work didn't come out of the blue in the sense that there were abolitionists, but insofar as their work revolved mostly around supporting and maintaining
441:
Well, you should understand there is a difference between people commenting "Statements X, Y , and Z need citation" and "This article seems undercited". The former is actionable, the latter is not. Articles don't need citing, facts do. Citing at the end of a paragraph is still fairly unambiguous
410:
Also watch out for over citing. For example, where the information is UNCONTROVERSIAL, and easily referenced to, for example, several different pages in the same book, it is OK to condense these to a single reference, for example "Larson, pp 213, 264" or something like that, and simply cite at the
183:
The user who created the map is AWOL, so there's no way for us to ever discover its source. I really prefer the color map used earlier, but if a sourced file is needed, I suppose we can use the b/w red-county one I've switched it to. Insofar as they're licensed as free content, is the source really
1907:
Thanks so much, Qp. I appreciate your support. (As for the lead: Once again I messed up by caring too much about what other people had written before me. I always feel weird coming through with the sledgehammer, so I try to leave intact some of the original wording. But every time it seems it gets
1896:
I found this an excellent article by diligent colleague Scartol. It avoids most of the pitfalls of biography based on oral retellings and, once it gets going, is fluently and clearly written in accessible encyclopedic prose. Once some work is done on the lead, this will make a worthy candidate for
852:
Not all non-Americans will take the social and historical context for granted. Could something be said to explain the nature of slavery at this time? In particular, about the difference between a slave and a freed slave. Presumably, Tubman's work did not come out of the blue. On the one hand there
884:
Maybe not by governments, which are always the last to act. But the movement to abolish slavery was powerful, so I imagine that the slaves in Maryland would have been fully aware of it. Lincoln may not have intended to free the slaves, but the tipping point had been reached, and like a smart
934:
However, I imagine that the tendency, noted in the article, for slaves to be freed at a certain age was a response to the influence of the emancipation campaigns and a foreshadowing of the emancipation. I imagine that Maryland's closeness to Pennsylvania might have been significant
37:
I've spent some time taking this to a polished state, and I believe it's in FA-shape. I'd like comments and suggestions on how I can make it even better. (Two sources are heavily referenced, since there's a sad lack of books available – more info in the article.) Thanks in advance!
1093:
The map of Maryland with Dorchester marked is not particularly clear, in my opinion. By not showing neighbouring states it seems to hang in space, as if Maryland has a much longer southern coastline. It is surely crucial to mark the Mason-Dixon line, at least. And Delaware and
874:
I don't know how severely the southern states were being pressured by the northern ones – the Fugitive Slave Law, at least, is an example of the reverse. When the Civil War started, Lincoln had no intention of abolishing slavery, and many Union officials wanted to work out a
558:
I agree that it's not directly related, but given the barbarity of slavery and its effects on young people, I think the image is useful in depicting the conditions from which she escaped, and to illustrate the dangers she returned to – voluntarily – again and again.
1791:
Given the wild numbers which circulate in the children's books, and the amount of time Larson spends debunking it, I do think it's relevant. (The numbers for this and the record of how many slaves she helped liberate were changed even as I worked on the article.)
281:
Presumably she and John Tubman lived separately after their marriage? Perhaps you could mention this? Could you be more specific about the marriages? They all seem to have committed bigamy quite happily, presumably marriages were common law and not official ones.
1199:
There's some speculation on this. I thought about including the differing opinions from Clinton and Larson, but I worry about including too much of that sort of thing (I already feel like the article's heavy with it), and didn't think it would add too much here.
894:
Yes, but we don't really have much evidence of how they came into contact with it, and I'd hate to speculate. Larson does a bit of this (some parts of the book are pretty long tangents), but I don't know how helpful such a thing would be here.
1325:
Perhaps, but all of the biographies leave it as a mystery. My guess is that Bradford wasn't interested in (and/or didn't have the training in oral history to ask about) these routes, and later investigations haven't yielded much.
1716:
I find it a little hard to believe that Tubman would threaten to kill anyone once they were over the border into the free states, even if they intended to continue to Canada; but that's the impression this anecdote gave me, as
1439:
Undoubtedly – but I think they were becoming more complex even before she was born. The contradictions of a "land of the free" which was founded by slave owners began to unravel as soon as the Declaration was signed, methinks.
550:
The image "scars on a whipped slave" does not seem to directly relate to the article. It is an excellent picture, but I question its purpose here. Since this is not a picture of Ms. Tubman herself, I wonder why it is in the
1724:
That's also the impression Conrad and Clinton give; the fear was that they might give out information vital to keeping other people hidden and free. (Her exact words, according to Conrad, were: "Dead n don't tell no tales.")
977:
I expect that seems so basic to an American. But this subject is surprisingly little studied in Britain, and it's probably the same elsewhere. I admit that I'm way out of my comfort zone in trying to make useful comments.
922:
Surely Tubman saw free black people in Maryland, but they were born free, manumitted or purchased by family members. Escapees always fled, and her biographies are very clear that she was breaking new ground by going
1191:
Why were the slaveowners willing to free Tubman's father but not her mother? What was the difference? Was it, as you say in the next paragraph, that the children's status depended on the mother's status and not the
680:
One more thing, I noticed that several people have commented on the status of certain maps in this article. I would agree that maps could help, and that the current maps need work. Please consider contacting
207:. What would be really great, also given qp's comment below, would be a map showing the area where she actually lived, i.e. the North-Eastern United States. But I'm afraid I can't find one of those on commons. 1527:
It's not clear. Larson speaks of Tubman taking a route "out of Philadelphia to New York City, then on to Albany and Rochester, New York". Douglass' book is not much clearer (he moved around a bit; even
638:
These are all small issues. This seems VERY close to FA standard now, and just needs a little spit-polish to make it there. Good job, and I look forward to seeing this at FAC in the near future! --
1277:
Actually, there is: At the end of the first paragraph the sentence appears: "Tubman refused to wait for the Brodess family to decide her fate, despite her husband's efforts to dissuade her." –
1682:
Yes, she is the same Larson, and I agree that Conrad may have used flexible math. Since the point of the story isn't about how many were in the group, I've taken out the specific number. –
609:
The infobox "african american topics" Could probably find a better place. Could it be moved to the top of the page, or perhaps is there a horizontal version to be placed at the bottom?
203:
Images should have sources, if it is obvious that this image is created by the uploader, you could modify the image page to reflect that. There seems to be another image you could use:
1784:
I find the discussion of rewards slightly superfluous: does the reader require this? Perhaps the reader could simply be told that rewards were offered, including one for US$ 12,000.
218:
That's it – I'm going to make one this evening. I'm going to try my hand at cartography. Watch out, world! Here I come with my pastel paint buckets and standardized fonts. –
685:, who is unequivocally the best cartographer (at least, in my humble opinion) here at Knowledge. He has done several maps for articles I have worked on (see infobox at 689:
for one example). You may want to consider contacting him at his talk page. He is very good, and usually very fast. I can give no better recommendation than him.--
1270:
Although Tubman's husband is mentioned later, there is no mention of him when she escapes from Maryland. From a storytelling point of view, the omission struck me.
471:
Yes, I see what you mean. I hope you won't be offended if – rather than go through and redo all the citations in HT – I put it into practice in future work. –
1316:
Because the specifics of her route were used by other fugitive slaves, Tubman did not speak about them; particulars of her journey remain shrouded in secret.
987:
I'll keep working at it. I actually heard a very interesting talk several years back by a fellow who had written a book about British abolitionists entitled
21: 952:
Maybe I should add a sentence or two on the general lay of the land, in terms of which states did and did not allow slavery? Or something like that? –
204: 1569:. Did she do this in other states than Maryland? (I know Delaware was a slave-owning state, but not such a dangerous one at this time, I would say.) 1318:
Did not speak of them at the time; that makes sense. But later, when her story was taken down, surely it would have been safe to speak of the route?
418:
In the past I've been chided for not having enough citations (see example above), so I tend to overdo it rather than take a risk in underciting. –
1748:
I suspect that Tubman might have been exaggerating here. I would at least add a "Tubman remembered", or something here, to frame the assertion.
1399:
The article says that it was unusual for a slave to marry a free man, but later it says that her sister Kessiah did the same. How unusual?
1234:
Also, her father had been owned by a different family – one, presumably, more willing to carry out its patriarch's last requests. –
17: 700: 649: 593: 505: 457: 1922: 1901: 1886: 1873: 1838: 1819: 1806: 1771: 1752: 1739: 1707: 1696: 1661: 1648: 1613: 1600: 1557: 1546: 1511: 1500: 1454: 1434: 1420: 1386: 1357: 1340: 1304: 1291: 1259: 1248: 1227: 1214: 1180: 1163: 1130: 1115: 1080: 1057: 1040: 1005: 982: 966: 939: 909: 889: 843: 828: 782: 769: 725: 705: 674: 654: 630: 598: 573: 533: 510: 485: 462: 432: 401: 359: 330: 319: 299: 274: 232: 211: 198: 163: 129: 101: 52: 387:
Yeah, I think I did okay with this in general, and forgot I had added it earlier in the lead. Thanks for the reminder. –
1627:. What does legendary mean in this context? At the time, or later? Does it mean merely "famous" or "semi-mythical"? 1140:
Her owner said she was "not worth a sixpence" and returned her to Brodess, who tried unsuccessfully to sell her.
1406:
A good point, and one I hadn't picked up on. I still think it was an anomaly. Maybe Harriet inspired her? –
1026:
They are. She got ill from her constant slogging through the water, especially in the autumn and winter. –
1430:
complex as the old certainties of the slave system were undermined in this death-throe period of slavery.
711:
Yeah, I think it may even be easy enough for me to make one of my own, using the USA maps available. –
862: 794: 71: 1529: 1466: 694: 643: 587: 499: 451: 1353:
Fair enough. Perhaps changing the semicolon to a full stop would remove the implied connection.
1815:
It's up to you. But if Larsen has debunked the earlier stories, then they have been superseded.
1017:
Constantly wading waist-high into cold water, she fell ill with measles and was sent back home.
1915: 1866: 1831: 1799: 1764: 1732: 1689: 1641: 1593: 1539: 1493: 1447: 1413: 1379: 1333: 1284: 1241: 1207: 1156: 1108: 1073: 1033: 998: 959: 902: 821: 762: 718: 667: 623: 566: 526: 478: 425: 394: 377: 352: 312: 292: 267: 225: 191: 156: 122: 94: 45: 988: 1066:
article. Curse me! Apparently I summarized it wrong, and have now reworded it correctly. –
184:
urgent? This is not a rhetorical question; I'm not well-versed on image legality issues. –
686: 1634:
I meant to indicate that everyone knew she was willing to use it. I've reworded this. –
327: 208: 31: 247:
Can you cite "Because the specifics of her route were used by other fugitive slaves"?
797:
and a line of context to indicate why she would be free in one state and not another.
690: 639: 583: 495: 447: 1909: 1860: 1825: 1793: 1758: 1726: 1683: 1635: 1587: 1533: 1487: 1441: 1407: 1373: 1327: 1278: 1235: 1201: 1150: 1102: 1067: 1027: 992: 953: 896: 815: 756: 712: 682: 661: 617: 560: 520: 472: 419: 388: 346: 306: 286: 261: 219: 185: 150: 116: 88: 39: 1898: 1883: 1816: 1749: 1704: 1658: 1610: 1554: 1508: 1431: 1354: 1301: 1256: 1224: 1177: 1127: 1054: 979: 936: 886: 840: 779: 112: 1062:
Hmm. I was misled by my failure to read more closely into the sources and the
1019:
This sentence makes it seem to me as if the two clauses are somehow connected.
1567:
Her journeys into the heart of slaveholding states put her at tremendous risk
1859:
Parents, etc. I changed it to "relatives", which is hopefully more clear. –
1824:
Well, even she admits that it's hard to know for sure. I like it as is. –
136:"in the midst of slavery's tumult" is a strange phrase, can you reword? 1625:
She also carried a handgun, and her willingness to use it was legendary
1149:
Yes, but she had been hired out. I've tried to make this more clear. –
1063: 372:
Just gave it a readthrough. Looks great. Just some general comments:
149:
I meant to fix that earlier and it must have slipped my mind. Fixed. –
111:
Hmm. The LOC page indicates no date is included on the caption card.
170:
The map and picture of Susan B. Anthony have no source specified.
660:
Thank you kindly. I do hope to move it along quickly. Cheers! –
115:
gives a date of c. 1880, so I'll use that on the page itself. –
108:
Why does the photograph say 1868 but 1880 on the image page?
1852:, Does this mean her parents etc., or children of her own? 326:
The tag on the picture of David Hunter should be updated.
345:
Thanks for your kind feedback and attention to detail. –
70:
along with the required parameters to the article - see
793:
On the other hand, I'd add a phrase of explanation for
616:
Yeah, I used the footer instead. Good call, thanks. –
62:
Certainly a very strong article. My few comments are:
1586:
True. I suppose the plural is superfluous. Fixed. –
1465:
Perhaps a phrase of explanation is needed about the
1673:During one voyage with twenty-five fugitive slaves 1101:Yes. I'm going to make such a map this evening. – 1532:isn't very specific about where he lived when. – 1053:But they aren't. You catch measles from a virus. 1176:I assumed this is what was meant. Clear now. 8: 865:, I figured that explanation was sufficient. 778:That's a very effective lead now, I think. 205:Image:Map of USA highlighting Maryland.png 1300:I missed that! My fault and apologies. 7: 1142:I thought Brodess owned her anyway. 885:politician he surfed the big wave. 28: 1577: 1477: 1363: 805: 746: 336: 251: 174: 140: 78: 1897:featured status, in my opinion. 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 1908:changed eventually anyway!) – 1: 1923:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1902:20:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1887:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1874:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1839:02:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1820:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1807:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1772:02:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1753:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1740:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1708:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1697:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1662:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1649:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1614:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1601:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1558:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1547:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1512:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1501:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1455:02:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1435:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1421:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1387:02:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1358:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1341:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1305:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1292:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1260:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1249:18:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1228:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1215:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1181:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1164:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1131:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1116:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1081:02:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1058:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1041:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1006:02:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 983:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 967:18:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 940:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 910:02:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 890:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 844:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 829:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 783:23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 770:18:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 726:18:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 706:04:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 675:19:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 655:17:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 631:19:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 599:04:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 574:19:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 534:11:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 511:05:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 486:18:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 463:04:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 433:19:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 402:19:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 360:15:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 331:09:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 320:19:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 300:15:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 275:15:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 233:18:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 212:09:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 199:15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 164:15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 130:15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 102:15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 53:02:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 68:{{persondata|PLEASE SEE ]!}} 1939: 285:Will address this soon. – 1520:Where did Douglass live? 74:for more information. 1850:tending to her family 305:to Bradford. Alas. – 58:Comments by DrKiernan 1757:Yeah, okay. Done. – 1126:You versatile chap. 863:Underground Railroad 795:Underground Railroad 494:HT? What's that? -- 368:Comments by Jayron32 72:Knowledge:Persondata 519:H as in Harriet. – 1530:Frederick Douglass 1467:Fugitive Slave Law 1255:That might be it. 1919: 1870: 1835: 1803: 1768: 1736: 1693: 1645: 1597: 1543: 1497: 1486:Agreed. Added. – 1451: 1417: 1383: 1337: 1288: 1245: 1211: 1160: 1112: 1077: 1037: 1002: 963: 906: 825: 766: 722: 703: 697: 671: 652: 646: 627: 596: 590: 570: 530: 508: 502: 482: 460: 454: 429: 398: 356: 316: 296: 271: 229: 195: 160: 126: 98: 49: 1930: 1920: 1917: 1912: 1871: 1868: 1863: 1836: 1833: 1828: 1804: 1801: 1796: 1769: 1766: 1761: 1737: 1734: 1729: 1694: 1691: 1686: 1646: 1643: 1638: 1598: 1595: 1590: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1544: 1541: 1536: 1498: 1495: 1490: 1485: 1481: 1480: 1452: 1449: 1444: 1418: 1415: 1410: 1384: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1338: 1335: 1330: 1289: 1286: 1281: 1246: 1243: 1238: 1212: 1209: 1204: 1161: 1158: 1153: 1113: 1110: 1105: 1078: 1075: 1070: 1038: 1035: 1030: 1003: 1000: 995: 964: 961: 956: 907: 904: 899: 826: 823: 818: 813: 809: 808: 767: 764: 759: 754: 750: 749: 723: 720: 715: 701: 695: 672: 669: 664: 650: 644: 628: 625: 620: 594: 588: 571: 568: 563: 531: 528: 523: 506: 500: 483: 480: 475: 458: 452: 446:cited article.-- 430: 427: 422: 399: 396: 391: 357: 354: 349: 344: 340: 339: 317: 314: 309: 297: 294: 289: 272: 269: 264: 259: 255: 254: 230: 227: 222: 196: 193: 188: 182: 178: 177: 161: 158: 153: 148: 144: 143: 127: 124: 119: 99: 96: 91: 86: 82: 81: 69: 50: 47: 42: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1916: 1910: 1867: 1861: 1832: 1826: 1800: 1794: 1765: 1759: 1733: 1727: 1703:That solves it. 1690: 1684: 1642: 1636: 1594: 1588: 1578: 1576: 1540: 1534: 1494: 1488: 1478: 1476: 1448: 1442: 1414: 1408: 1380: 1374: 1364: 1362: 1334: 1328: 1285: 1279: 1242: 1236: 1208: 1202: 1157: 1151: 1109: 1103: 1074: 1068: 1034: 1028: 999: 993: 989:Bury the Chains 960: 954: 903: 897: 822: 816: 806: 804: 763: 757: 747: 745: 734: 719: 713: 687:Plymouth Colony 668: 662: 624: 618: 582:Fair enough. -- 567: 561: 527: 521: 479: 473: 426: 420: 395: 389: 370: 353: 347: 337: 335: 313: 307: 293: 287: 268: 262: 252: 250: 226: 220: 192: 186: 175: 173: 157: 151: 141: 139: 123: 117: 95: 89: 79: 77: 67: 60: 46: 40: 35: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 1936: 1934: 1926: 1925: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1877: 1876: 1854: 1853: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1822: 1810: 1809: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1743: 1742: 1719: 1718: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1700: 1699: 1677: 1676: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1652: 1651: 1629: 1628: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1604: 1603: 1571: 1570: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1550: 1549: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1504: 1503: 1471: 1470: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1437: 1424: 1423: 1401: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1320: 1319: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1295: 1294: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1252: 1251: 1231: 1230: 1218: 1217: 1194: 1193: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1144: 1143: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1096: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1021: 1020: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 972: 971: 970: 969: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 927: 926: 925: 924: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 879: 878: 877: 876: 869: 868: 867: 866: 855: 854: 849: 848: 847: 846: 834: 833: 832: 831: 799: 798: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 773: 772: 740: 739: 733: 730: 729: 728: 678: 677: 636: 635: 634: 633: 611: 610: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 577: 576: 553: 552: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 514: 513: 489: 488: 466: 465: 436: 435: 413: 412: 407: 406: 405: 404: 382: 381: 376:Watch out for 369: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 324: 323: 322: 302: 279: 278: 277: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 168: 167: 166: 134: 133: 132: 106: 105: 104: 59: 56: 34: 32:Harriet Tubman 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1935: 1924: 1921: 1913: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1900: 1888: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1875: 1872: 1864: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1848: 1847: 1840: 1837: 1829: 1823: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1808: 1805: 1797: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1773: 1770: 1762: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1730: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1715: 1714: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1695: 1687: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1663: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1639: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1615: 1612: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1591: 1584: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1559: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1545: 1537: 1531: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1491: 1484: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1456: 1453: 1445: 1438: 1436: 1433: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1411: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1388: 1385: 1377: 1370: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1356: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1342: 1339: 1331: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1282: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1239: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1205: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1190: 1189: 1182: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1165: 1162: 1154: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1132: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1117: 1114: 1106: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1094:Pennsylvania. 1092: 1091: 1082: 1079: 1071: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1042: 1039: 1031: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1014: 1007: 1004: 996: 990: 986: 985: 984: 981: 976: 975: 974: 973: 968: 965: 957: 951: 950: 949: 948: 941: 938: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 921: 920: 919: 918: 911: 908: 900: 893: 892: 891: 888: 883: 882: 881: 880: 873: 872: 871: 870: 864: 859: 858: 857: 856: 851: 850: 845: 842: 838: 837: 836: 835: 830: 827: 819: 812: 803: 802: 801: 800: 796: 792: 791: 784: 781: 777: 776: 775: 774: 771: 768: 760: 753: 744: 743: 742: 741: 736: 735: 731: 727: 724: 716: 710: 709: 708: 707: 704: 698: 692: 688: 684: 676: 673: 665: 659: 658: 657: 656: 653: 647: 641: 632: 629: 621: 615: 614: 613: 612: 608: 607: 600: 597: 591: 585: 581: 580: 579: 578: 575: 572: 564: 557: 556: 555: 554: 549: 548: 535: 532: 524: 518: 517: 516: 515: 512: 509: 503: 497: 493: 492: 491: 490: 487: 484: 476: 470: 469: 468: 467: 464: 461: 455: 449: 445: 440: 439: 438: 437: 434: 431: 423: 417: 416: 415: 414: 409: 408: 403: 400: 392: 386: 385: 384: 383: 379: 375: 374: 373: 367: 361: 358: 350: 343: 334: 333: 332: 329: 325: 321: 318: 310: 303: 301: 298: 290: 284: 283: 280: 276: 273: 265: 258: 249: 248: 246: 245: 234: 231: 223: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 210: 206: 202: 201: 200: 197: 189: 181: 172: 171: 169: 165: 162: 154: 147: 138: 137: 135: 131: 128: 120: 114: 110: 109: 107: 103: 100: 92: 85: 76: 75: 73: 65: 64: 63: 57: 55: 54: 51: 43: 33: 30: 23: 19: 1895: 1849: 1672: 1624: 1582: 1566: 1553:Fair enough. 1482: 1368: 1315: 1139: 1016: 810: 751: 683:User:Kmusser 679: 637: 443: 371: 341: 256: 179: 145: 83: 61: 36: 875:compromise. 732:User:Qp10qp 378:overlinking 66:Please add 22:Peer review 1192:father's? 328:DrKiernan 209:DrKiernan 1882:Cheers. 1609:Cheers. 702:contribs 691:Jayron32 651:contribs 640:Jayron32 595:contribs 584:Jayron32 551:article. 507:contribs 496:Jayron32 459:contribs 448:Jayron32 444:properly 20:‎ | 1911:Scartol 1862:Scartol 1827:Scartol 1795:Scartol 1760:Scartol 1728:Scartol 1717:worded. 1685:Scartol 1637:Scartol 1589:Scartol 1535:Scartol 1489:Scartol 1443:Scartol 1409:Scartol 1375:Scartol 1329:Scartol 1280:Scartol 1237:Scartol 1203:Scartol 1152:Scartol 1104:Scartol 1069:Scartol 1064:measles 1029:Scartol 994:Scartol 955:Scartol 898:Scartol 817:Scartol 758:Scartol 714:Scartol 663:Scartol 619:Scartol 562:Scartol 522:Scartol 474:Scartol 421:Scartol 390:Scartol 348:Scartol 308:Scartol 288:Scartol 263:Scartol 221:Scartol 187:Scartol 152:Scartol 118:Scartol 90:Scartol 41:Scartol 1899:qp10qp 1884:qp10qp 1817:qp10qp 1750:qp10qp 1705:qp10qp 1659:qp10qp 1611:qp10qp 1555:qp10qp 1509:qp10qp 1432:qp10qp 1355:qp10qp 1302:qp10qp 1257:qp10qp 1225:qp10qp 1178:qp10qp 1128:qp10qp 1055:qp10qp 980:qp10qp 937:qp10qp 887:qp10qp 841:qp10qp 780:qp10qp 1507:Fine. 923:back. 16:< 1918:Talk 1869:Talk 1834:Talk 1802:Talk 1767:Talk 1735:Talk 1692:Talk 1657:OK. 1644:Talk 1596:Talk 1583:Done 1542:Talk 1496:Talk 1483:Done 1450:Talk 1416:Talk 1382:Talk 1369:Done 1336:Talk 1287:Talk 1244:Talk 1223:OK. 1210:Talk 1159:Talk 1111:Talk 1076:Talk 1036:Talk 1001:Talk 991:. – 962:Talk 935:too. 905:Talk 861:the 839:OK. 824:Talk 811:Done 765:Talk 752:Done 721:Talk 696:talk 670:Talk 645:talk 626:Talk 589:talk 569:Talk 529:Talk 501:talk 481:Talk 453:talk 428:Talk 397:Talk 355:Talk 342:Done 315:Talk 295:Talk 270:Talk 257:Done 228:Talk 194:Talk 180:Done 159:Talk 146:Done 125:Talk 97:Talk 84:Done 48:Talk 113:PBS 1914:· 1865:· 1830:· 1798:· 1792:– 1763:· 1731:· 1725:– 1688:· 1640:· 1592:· 1538:· 1492:· 1446:· 1440:– 1412:· 1378:· 1372:– 1332:· 1326:– 1283:· 1240:· 1206:· 1200:– 1155:· 1107:· 1072:· 1032:· 997:· 958:· 901:· 895:– 820:· 814:– 761:· 755:– 717:· 666:· 622:· 565:· 559:– 525:· 477:· 424:· 393:· 351:· 311:· 291:· 266:· 260:– 224:· 190:· 155:· 121:· 93:· 87:– 44:· 38:– 1469:. 699:| 693:| 648:| 642:| 592:| 586:| 504:| 498:| 456:| 450:|

Index

Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
Peer review
Harriet Tubman
Scartol
Talk
02:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge:Persondata
Scartol
Talk
15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
PBS
Scartol
Talk
15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Scartol
Talk
15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Scartol
Talk
15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Map of USA highlighting Maryland.png
DrKiernan
09:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Scartol
Talk
18:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Scartol
Talk
15:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Scartol

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.