Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Military history/News/November 2016/Review essay - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

191: 139: 177:
integrating armoured and infantry forces to make carefully orchestrated attacks. Buckley notes that such approaches were portrayed by German officers as cowardly in their books on the war and have been judged to be unimaginative and unagressive by many post-war historians, but finds such views unpersasive. Instead, he argues - convincingly in my view - that while the British Army did have some rough patches, its combat performance improved markedly over time as its leaders and men learnt from experience and it achieved its goals in the campaign at an acceptable cost in casualties.
228:(much of the analysis of its successes in this period seems based around the Normandy campaign, and fails to recognise the heavy casualties it suffered in this fighting or its many subsequent tactical failures). While the Japanese Army learnt from its experiences and implemented improved doctrines - especially in regards to island defence - it seems to have failed to keep up with the Allied armies and was routinely being outfought from 1943 onwards. Analysis on why this happened would greatly enrich our understanding of the war. 224:
environment of North-West Europe. However, he argues that once the Army placed greater emphasis on genuinely combined arms warfare it became a force which the German Army was unable to match. Similarly, Threlfall demonstrates that when the Australian Army belatedly got its doctrine, training, equipment and organisation in order it was pretty much impossible for the Japanese forces to defeat.
187:, it analyses why the Australian Army's performance in jungle warfare improved so dramatically over the course of the Pacific War. In doing so it challenges the traditional view among Australians that their army is somehow automatically competent at all forms of warfare, and the defeats and heavy casualties suffered during 1941 and 1942 were due to factors beyond its control. 43: 297: 135:(to quote the title of a popular work in this genre) and mistakes made by the Germans. Conversely, the final years of the war in the Pacific have been characterised as a straightfoward slogging match, with the Japanese being unable to compete against the superior numbers and firepower of the Allied forces. 203:
being forced to draw on flawed British doctrines and learn "on the job" ahead of its doomed campaigns in Malaya and the islands to the north of Australia in early 1942. He's also highly critical of the Army's slow learning process, and convincingly shows how inadequate training and a slow and ad-hoc
172:
campaign in Europe. In the book's first chapter Buckley notes that perceptions of the British Army's performance deteriorated in the post-war era, and by the 1980s it was generally seen to have been "ponderous, predictable and heavily reliant on the Americans", and inferior to the German forces. His
134:
Over recent years there's been a steady stream of books re-assessing the performance of the Western Allied armies during the final years of World War II. The conventional thinking has been that the Western Allied armies facing Germany performed poorly, and achieved victory only through "brute force"
223:
A common thread in these two books is that they break down why the Allied armies were successful. Buckley notes that many of the British Army's problems in the campaign in Normandy were due to attempts to import tactics which had proven successful in the Mediterranean to the very different tactical
176:
In short, Buckley argues that the British Army's performance was, while not spectacular, generally highly competent. He attributes this to the Army typically playing to its strengths during battles, by drawing on the heavy use of firepower to defeat German forces wherever possible and successfully
227:
An interesting next step in this line of thinking would be some up-to-date analysis of the performance of the Allied armies with those of the Axis. While the German Army is often thought to have been tactically highly adept, it's clear that its performance deteriorated sharply over 1944 and 1945
220:" structure for its combat units. Importantly, Threlfall shows how these improved further over the remainder of the war, with the result that the Australian forces involved in the fairly ambitious campaigns of late 1944 and early 1945 completely outclassed their opponents. 216:". Despite initially dragging its feet, the Army moved remarkably quickly from 1942 to set up institutionalised processes to build the lessons learnt from combat into training, and developed a highly successful jungle warfare doctrine and generally-successful " 198:
The core of the book is a thoughtful analysis of the Army's jungle warfare doctrine and training. Threlfall demonstrates that the Australian Army was utterly unprepared to fight in Australia's own geographic region at the outbreak of the Pacific War, with the
211:
Threlfall sets out how the Army learned from its many mistakes and became what he claims was (without much comparative evidence, alas) "the world's most deadly jungle fighting force". In essence, this involved becoming what's currently called a
94: 78: 70: 82: 74: 90: 325: 66: 25: 409: 342: 158:
provides a re-assessment of the British Army's performance from the invasion of Normandy in June 1944 until the end of the war in Europe in May 1945. Adrian Threlfall's
57: 42: 21: 150:
Two recent works by an Australian and a British historian provide an interesting example of the new types of analysis which is challenging these views.
318: 51: 17: 275: 257: 190: 269:
Jungle Warriors : From Tobruk to Kokoda and beyond, How the Australian Army Became the World's Most Deadly Jungle Fighting Force
173:
underlying thesis is that such a perception is unsustainable given what the Army achieved, and sets out to explain how it won.
138: 239:
are useful additions to the literature on the Allied armies of World War II, and good examples of where the genre is heading.
204:
process of improving doctrine contributed to the Army's many difficulties during the fighting in New Guinea during 1942.
200: 151: 332: 162:
covers the evolution of the Australian Army's jungle warfare doctrine and performance from 1941 to 1945.
213: 272: 254: 217: 169: 314:
is the monthly newsletter of the English Knowledge (XXG)'s Military history WikiProject.
403: 143: 127: 184: 106: 194:
Australian soldiers crossing a river in New Britain during May 1945
189: 114:
New thinking on the British and Australian Armies of World War II
295: 146:
tanks passing through a devastated German town in March 1945
41: 251:
Monty's Men: The British Army and the Liberation of Europe
386: 372: 365: 354: 370:. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try 410:WikiProject Military history newsletter articles 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 382:No comments yet. Yours could be the first! 168:is structured around a narrative of the 137: 183:is a rather different book. Based on 7: 253:. New Haven: Yale University Press. 32: 53:Your military history newsletter 367:add the page to your watchlist 1: 271:. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. 287: 59:Issue CXXVII, November 2016 426: 267:Threlfall, Adrian (2014). 310:First published in 2006, 207:Over the second half of 300: 249:Buckley, John (2013). 195: 147: 46: 299: 214:learning organisation 193: 141: 45: 364:To follow comments, 95:World War I timeline 344:Browse the Archives 359:Discuss this story 327:Visit the Newsroom 301: 243:Publishing details 196: 185:Threlfall's thesis 148: 47: 398: 397: 394: 393: 374:purging the cache 320:About the project 170:21st Army Group's 122: 121: 105: 104: 101: 100: 417: 377: 375: 368: 360: 357: 345: 338: 328: 321: 307: 298: 289: 288: 285: 284: 281: 263: 107: 60: 54: 38: 37: 34: 33: 425: 424: 420: 419: 418: 416: 415: 414: 400: 399: 390: 389: 387:+ Add a comment 384: 379: 373: 371: 366: 362: 361: 358: 355:+ Add a comment 353: 349: 348: 347: 343: 333: 326: 319: 308: 302: 296: 278: 266: 260: 248: 237:Jungle Warriors 218:Jungle division 209:Jungle Warriors 181:Jungle Warriors 160:Jungle Warriors 118: 97: 62: 58: 52: 30: 29: 28: 12: 11: 5: 423: 421: 413: 412: 402: 401: 396: 395: 392: 391: 385: 380: 363: 352: 351: 350: 340: 330: 323: 316: 315: 309: 294: 293: 292: 283: 282: 276: 264: 258: 152:John Buckley's 132: 131: 120: 119: 117: 110: 103: 102: 99: 98: 65: 64: 63: 50: 49: 48: 31: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 422: 411: 408: 407: 405: 388: 383: 376: 369: 356: 346: 339: 337: 334:Subscribe to 329: 322: 313: 306: 291: 290: 286: 279: 277:9781742372204 274: 270: 265: 261: 259:9780300134490 256: 252: 247: 246: 245: 244: 240: 238: 234: 229: 225: 221: 219: 215: 210: 205: 202: 192: 188: 186: 182: 178: 174: 171: 167: 163: 161: 157: 153: 145: 140: 136: 130: 129: 124: 123: 116: 115: 111: 109: 108: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 61: 55: 44: 40: 39: 36: 35: 27: 26:November 2016 23: 19: 381: 335: 311: 304: 268: 250: 242: 241: 236: 232: 230: 226: 222: 208: 206: 201:8th Division 197: 180: 179: 175: 165: 164: 159: 155: 149: 133: 125: 113: 112: 87:Review essay 86: 79:Book reviews 75:Article news 71:Project news 233:Monty's Men 166:Monty's Men 156:Monty's Men 67:Front page 336:the Bugle 312:the Bugle 305:The Bugle 231:Overall, 83:Interview 404:Category 142:British 24:‎ | 20:‎ | 303:About 128:Nick-D 154:book 144:Comet 91:Op-ed 16:< 273:ISBN 255:ISBN 235:and 22:News 126:By 406:: 341:» 331:» 324:» 317:» 93:• 89:• 85:• 81:• 77:• 73:• 69:• 56:– 378:. 280:. 262:. 212:"

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
News
November 2016

Your military history newsletter
Issue CXXVII, November 2016
Front page
Project news
Article news
Book reviews
Interview
Review essay
Op-ed
World War I timeline
Nick-D

Comet
John Buckley's
21st Army Group's
Threlfall's thesis

8th Division
learning organisation
Jungle division
ISBN
9780300134490
ISBN
9781742372204
About the project
Visit the Newsroom

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.