311:: G'day, and welcome to Milhist A-Class Review. Thank you for your efforts with this article so far. I've had a quick look at the article and a couple of things stand out to me as potential issues at A-class. The main one, for me, is that the article is currently very short. This indicates that potentially there isn't depth of coverage/it isn't comprehensive. The ACR process aims to produce articles that are very close to Featured Articles in terms of quality. In this regard, the standard expected is quite high. As such, I'd recommend withdrawing this ACR and focusing on the GAN that you have also submitted for this (I note Tomandjerry's comment above in this regard, and concur with this). Once that is done, you will potentially have a better idea of where this article sits on the assessment scale. Additionally, if you would like ideas for expansion, perhaps the
69:
288:
Unfortunately, I have to still keep it at an oppose for coverage and accuracy. MILHIST A-class standards are set close to FA standards. Good luck taking this article further,
21:
122:
17:
118:
324:
297:
281:
238:
220:
177:
96:
65:
110:
148:
293:
234:
229:
An A-class and GA review should not be run simotanuously. I suggest holding off this review until that's finished. Thanks, --
216:
336:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
315:
process might help. I hope you won't be discouraged by these comments, though. Good luck with taking it further. Regards,
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
153:
320:
289:
230:
212:
208:
196:
There are only seven sources. An A-class article is supposed to have broad croverage. More sources needed.
53:
316:
114:
61:
277:
250:
173:
92:
49:
105:
78:
57:
273:
169:
168:
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it meets the A-Class criteria.
88:
312:
259:
sources increased from 7 to 12, or approximately 1 RS for each 35 words of text
186:. This need some significant work to be A-class. Some comments below:
158:
130:
126:
8:
137:
140:
18:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
7:
33:The following discussion is closed.
265:copyedited positioning of footnotes
256:references for list of cities added
199:Footnotes in lead are unnecessary.
28:
332:The discussion above is closed.
193:Reference for the list of cities.
253:; I've now fixed these issues:
71:« Return to A-Class review list
309:Comments from AustralianRupert
202:Footnotes go after the period.
66:03:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
325:04:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
298:14:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
282:00:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
262:removed footnotes from lede
239:22:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
221:23:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
178:20:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
97:20:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
353:
334:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
268:DABed link to "The Day"
46:No consensus to promote
205:DAB link to "The Day"
290:Tomandjerry211 (alt)
231:Tomandjerry211 (alt)
213:Tomandjerry211 (alt)
211:could be helpful.--
166:
165:
100:
74:
344:
317:AustralianRupert
138:
135:
134:
106:Coast Guard City
85:
79:Coast Guard City
68:
38:
352:
351:
347:
346:
345:
343:
342:
341:
340:
108:
104:
82:
48:at this time -
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
350:
348:
339:
338:
328:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
285:
284:
271:
270:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
251:Tomandjerry211
242:
241:
226:
225:
224:
223:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
188:
187:
164:
163:
162:
161:
159:External links
156:
151:
143:
142:
102:
101:
87:Nominator(s):
81:
76:
43:
42:
41:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
349:
337:
335:
330:
329:
327:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
283:
279:
275:
272:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
254:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
191:
190:
189:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
175:
171:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
139:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
107:
99:
98:
94:
90:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
73:
72:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
37:
31:
30:
23:
19:
333:
331:
308:
307:
183:
167:
154:Citation bot
103:
86:
70:
50:Peacemaker67
45:
44:
35:
32:
313:peer review
58:MilHistBot
22:Assessment
274:LavaBaron
170:LavaBaron
89:LavaBaron
249:Thanks,
149:Analysis
20: |
141:Toolbox
119:history
184:Oppose
56:) via
127:watch
123:links
16:<
321:talk
294:talk
278:talk
235:talk
217:talk
209:This
174:talk
131:logs
115:talk
111:edit
93:talk
62:talk
54:talk
323:)
296:)
280:)
237:)
219:)
176:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
95:)
64:)
319:(
300:.
292:(
276:(
233:(
215:(
172:(
133:)
109:(
91:(
60:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.