Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Croatian War of Independence

3179:. As I already mentioned, all my substantial remarks have been addressed. Some additional improvements (other than the ones discussed here) have also been implemented since this review started. Referencing is excellent, relying where possible on English-language sources, which is not only in line with relevant guidelines, but also contributes to neutrality. Comprehensiveness is also excellent. I cannot find factual errors or significant omissions. Moreover, it is obvious that significant effort has gone into putting facts in proper context and providing background where necessary. The article size is substantial, but in my opinion still not problematic, because it stays on topic and avoids unnecessary details (i.e. only rather minor trimming might still be possible/desirable). Prose quality is very good, improved by the recent thorough copyedit. 3826:: Sorry, my internet connection is still struggling with this article (it is taking about 20 minutes to load the page and editting is almost impossible for me). I can't comment on the content really, as I have no knowledge of it, so I am focusing mainly on prose. From what I can see there is a bit of work required in this area before it could be passed as an A-class article, but that is not necessarily to say that it can't make it in the time period allocated (it will be due for closure on 11 February, so there is a bit of time). I will list a few examples from the Military forces section as I see them. If you can work on these now, and then go through the article again looking for similar issues, it might help tighten the prose: 627:

that JNA tried to gain approval for "operation “Shield” designed to disarm the Croatian military organization and put its leaders on trial" and declaration of state of emergency, however the divided presidency could not act. This serves to verify that JNA did in fact plan to capture at least a substantial part of Croatia, presumably including Zagreb (since the plan entailed capture and trial of Croatian leadership). The divided federal presidency indeed failed to grant approval to the JNA, but it also ostensibly failed to hold it back. Furthermore the JNA operated quite well without any approval by the presidency - getting its supplies and personnel from Serbia, as confirmed by reliable sources cited in the article.

4585:: this A-class review will be due for closing by an uninvolved co-ordinator in about 24 hours time (they have a 28 day limit). At that point the decision about whether it can be promoted to A-class or not will be made. I believe that a lot of excellent work has been done on this article, however, as I have been unable to check all the sources and read the article fully due to connection issues (downloading the pdf copy crashed my machine this afternoon), unfortunately I am unable to support its promotion to A-class at this time. However, I will not oppose either, though, for as I said, I believe a lot of work has gone into the article. Regards, 4336:"In August 1991, the Croatian Army had fewer than 20 brigades, which would grow to 60 brigades and 37 independent battalions by the end of the year through general mobilization which was initiated in October". Perhaps try: "In August 1991, the Croatian Army had fewer than 20 brigades. General mobilization was instituted in October, though, and subsequently the size of the army grew 60 brigades and 37 independent battalions by the end of the year"; 4257:

drop makeshift bombs." Perhaps try: "Weaponry was in short supply and many units were formed either unarmed or with obsolete World War II-era rifles. In terms of armor, the Croatian Army had only a handful of tanks, including World War II surplus vehicles such as the T-34, and its air force was in an even worse state, consisting of only a few Antonov An-2 biplane crop-dusters that had been converted to drop makeshift bombs";

2451:

to be fixed - more than just the ones listed above!) and neutral in tone (in part due to a good choice of sources). I'd rate it high in both scope and focus, despite minor issues in this respect, described above. I believe that the initial phase of the war (March 1991 - January 1992) might still be covered more comprehensively, because - as the article points out - most casualties and war damage fall into that period.

715:

events such as the Petrova Gora rally (generally underrated now, while the Gazimestan speech is generally somewhat overrated IMO), open talk of independence, and finally the HDZ's own nationalist and far right leanings (c.f. Račan's "dangerous intentions" remark). On the other hand, this section really shouldn't be much longer than it is, and it is neither possible nor desirable to go into greater detail here.

2975:

relation to other parts of Croatia and the map itself is quite approximate too. Perhaps when those two are removed there may be sufficient space to place that sidebar? Alternatively, the sidebar could be moved up a few sections quite harmlessly to where Movies and documentaries section begins - nothing would have to be rearranged then and the notes would get the extra space. Any thoughts on those two?--

321:. If all of these (including Miljevci) are added up, one gets 16,397 km2 or 28.97%. Considering possible (or even likely) inaccuracies I'd say usage of "approximately 29%" is fair. Simply said, the discrepancies stem from Dubrovnik hinterland not being included in the RSK and the W Slavonia occupation in 1991. --- In short, I'll attempt to distill something meaningful out of this.-- 2362:). Anyway I'm not sold on any of these points, but I'd rather have the whole section sit like this for a little while just to let it sink in better. Maybe we can revisit this issue in a couple weeks to see if we like this setup or should those be moved after all? (Besides, I hope other reviewers will read this and maybe suggest something new)-- 4484: 4433: 4393: 4348: 4309: 4269: 4229: 4190: 4150: 4111: 4072: 4029: 3989: 3950: 3910: 3870: 3745: 3671: 3628: 3517: 3478: 3439: 3407: 3367: 3328: 3296: 3267: 3077: 2928: 2838: 2520: 2421: 2307: 2028: 1922: 1881: 1846: 1780: 1687: 1622: 1503: 1403: 1369: 1326: 1287: 1240: 1201: 975: 875: 823: 723: 643: 558: 478: 440: 402: 338: 253: 215: 163: 631:

Sava to the East and Neretva in the South. In that way all territories inhabited by Serbs shall be covered until the final resolution, that is until the people freely decides in a referendum." These too contain geographical references which indicate that even those scaled down objectives were not met - Neretva River and Sava River.

1018:. Citation? It is true that Croatia was criticized, but that's (ostensibly) because it violated the cease fire agreement. Also, Medak pocket was (again, ostensibly) targeted for its artillery which had been shelling Gospić. Whether my interpretations here are correct (and relevant) or not, context could definitely be improved. 4461:

commanded a total of 570 tanks." Perhaps try: "On the other hand, the Croatian Army, Croatian Defence Council (Croatian: Hrvatsko vijeće obrane) (HVO) and the Army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, could field a combined force of 250,000 soldiers. In addition the three forces commanded a total of 570 tanks".

2203:. I don't think that keeping the section vs killing the section (and distributing its content) would lead to readers drawing different conclusions regarding the role of Serbia. Anyway, I'm pleased with the changes implemented since my original remarks were submitted, so I'd say this point is moot now. 4543:

Sorry, I'm still having troubles loading the article (I've tried both Firefox and IE). It took me ten minutes to load this morning, and then five to save one edit. This is making it very difficult for me to review the article, unfortunately. From what I can tell, though, Diannaa is doing an excellent

1682:

ICTY is not barred from any type of conflicts internal or international. They are only limited to prosecuting natural persons - I've also added a reference to their Statute which says so, so I don't think we have a conflicting interest there. Besides, another source was added to support the claim. As

2620:

I found the responses both quick and thoughtful, often aiming higher than just "patching" the issue at hand. I think that the article has progressed correspondingly. I have no further remarks regarding content. I'm going to wait until we're finished with the items above (we're almost there now), and

2450:

While this is not to be construed as a some kind formal review (a "replacement" for a GA review in particular), I believe that the article roughly meets the GA criteria, despite some smaller-scale issues. Overall, it is well-referenced (albeit with occasional unreferenced claims throughout that need

1674:

Here, the ICTY may not be fully reliable as a source because it is apparently in a conflict of interest: if I'm not mistaken, only international conflicts are within their jurisdiction, so ruling otherwise would be tantamount to declaring themselves lacking jurisdiction. I'm not faulting the article

1558:

Better, but still not completely fixed. Declaration of war (or lack thereof) is IMO orthogonal to the issue of the war being international or not. I fail to see how the (true and referenced) fact that the war was not declared might lead to any conclusions - one way or the other - about its character

4016:

this needs tweaking: "Thus paramilitary units like White Eagles, Serbian Guard, Dušan Silni or Serb Volunteer Guard, that committed numerous massacres against Croat and other non-Serbs civilians, became increasingly relied upon by the Yugoslav and Serb forces". Perhaps try: "Thus paramilitary units

3937:

in the Serbian forces subsection, this is not grammatically correct: "such as Soko G-4 Super Galeb and most notably Soko J-22 Orao whose armaments included AGM-65 Maverick guided missiles". Perhaps try: "such as the Soko G-4 Super Galeb and, most notably, the Soko J-22 Orao, whose armament included

3021:

I tried to move the sidebar to just below the infobox (in preview only not to disrupt the article) and did not observe any major problem with the sidebar. When placed within the fix bunching template it presents a white gap between the text to the left of the sidebar and the sidebar itself. If left

2974:

I was thinking of moving some images out, actually two maps: the Virovitica-Karlovac-Karlobag map is not actually a source or based on a source rather on a broad description, so is that WP:SYNTH? Also the map of Bihać pocket IMO is not really necessary as the infobox map indicates where Bihać is in

2357:

I wouldn't like to hurry such a move. The section (both subsections) provide a summary on Serbia-Croatia war related "relations" and postwar relations (broadly) so they complement each other nicely. Furthermore, being a proper summary, this place seems (at least to me) as good as any other. Finally

2302:

I reorganized the subsection, distilled the information already there and related information in the remaining text to provide a usable summary (for those readers going after this aspect only) with additional information on media role in this respect. I believe this setup might be alright since it,

812:

This seems to imply that the JNA attempted to subdue Slovenia, failed, then turned to Croatia as a some sort of "substitute". This would be a misinterpretation: JNA simply withdrew from Slovenia once the entire operation was recognized as pointless. The reasoning was as follows: the Slovenians want

693:

The S-2 plan was one of JNA strategic plans for defense of the SFRY. The S-2 was designed to combat a NATO invasion from the North and from the South. (The S-1 was designed to fight a Warsaw Pact invasion.) While it could be argued that it was used to combat Slovenia and/or Croatia, it seems highly

630:

It is also true that at one point Serb/JNA objectives changed, as evidenced by Jović in his diary and in his testimony to the ICTY. (also referenced in the article) In testimony (cited) he says "The main JNA forces shall be grouped on Karlovac-Plitvice line to the West; Baranja, Osijek, Vinkovci -

622:

Claim that the JNA was unable to advance... is somewhat awkward but fairly obvious - any army advance (if attempted and/or planned) is hindered by its opponent's resistance and supply problems (food, fuel, munitions or as in this case, manpower). Validity of the claim may, IMO, be questionable only

170:

I opted not to move the sentence as it is related to the Greater Serbia concept introduced into the article in the previous sentence. Instead I reworded the sentence in the lead to make it less awkward as there is no need to carry the entire quote in the sentence as the quote is already in the main

4177:

in the Croatian forces subsection, this sentence is quite confused and probably needs to be broken up somehow (not sure myself, sorry): "At the early stages of the war, lack of military units meant that the Croatian Police force would take the brunt of fighting—eventually the police would form the

2231:

Well, "Wartime damage" and "Casualties and refugees" are also mentioned in the article, and yet they both have their own stand-alone section. Likewise, Serbia's politicians are still shy to admit that the country was involved in the war, probably due to fears of war reparations, thus it's there to

2146:

First and foremost, I see this as more of a style and exposition issue, rather than a content issue. Some subjects are best covered in separate sections - a good example is "Type and name of the war". It is simply my opinion that the role of Serbia is best described concurrently with chronological

2072:

That is certainly possible - the second subsection could stand on its own as a section called "Croatia-Serbia relations after the war" or something along those lines. I admit the proposition carries a benefit of a shorter article with no loss of content, in fact I'm inclined to accept it. However,

864:

Serbs over-represented in the armed forces - same fact is essentially reported twice, in different ways (1981 and 1990). The 1990 figures seem both more relevant and provide better context (if Serbs were, say, 5% of the population, over-representation would probably not have mattered much), so I'd

634:

Taking into consideration the above I conclude that the CIA map is quite vague but it may be close to an early JNA plan (although that is impossible to confirm) and I also conclude that the JNA did in fact have a plan to overthrow the Croatian leadership by means of a military action and that both

626:

In that respect, the article says that JNA tried to "occupy the whole of Croatia". The claim is supported by two sources, including a book by Kadijević (federal defense secretary) and Bjelajac, Žunec, Boduszynski, Draschtak, Graovac, Kent, Malli, Pavlović, Vuić 2009, p. 241. The latter specifies

4380:

between September and December helped to alleviate the Croatians' equipment shortage and allowed them to recapture most of the weaponry that the JNA had confiscated from the Croatian TO depots in 1990. A significant number of heavy weapons were also captured, along with the 32nd JNA Corps' entire

4256:

this needs tweaking: "Weaponry was always lacking and many units were formed either unarmed or with WW2-era rifles. The Croatian Army had just a handful of tanks (even older WW2 veterans like the T-34) and its air-force was even worse: a few old Antonov An-2 biplane crop-dusters were converted to

3897:

in the Serbian forces subsection, there is a typo in this sentence: "However, by 1991, majority of this equipment was over 30 years old: it consisted substantially out of T-54/55 tank and the MiG-21 aircraft." (perhaps try "However, by 1991, the majority of this equipment was 30 years old, as the

2138:

As Tomobe duly noted, it is not as if Serbia's involvement is a minor issue not otherwise covered here. It spans from the 1980s, through more or less every phase of the war, virtually into present day (recent extradition requests, as seen in the news). I don't think I'd exaggerate much if I'd say

2102:

I don't think there's any possibility that even a casual reader of the lead, let alone the remaining text (apart from this particular section) would be in doubt that Serbia had been funding, manning (at least in part) and otherwise supporting JNA/RSK troops let alone "somehow involved". Still I'd

1465:

My remark about the sourcing does not concern the use of the word "conflict", but rather calling such a use a "euphemism". This is what the source apparently does not support. Strictly speaking, calling the war a "conflict" is not incorrect, since war is by definition a kind of conflict. In fact,

603:

Uncited and IMO only partly true. Note that the source for the map is CIA. Its origin may be the infamous S-2 war plan, but I don't think JNA ever actually thought of implementing it in its entirety because that would have made no sense (see my remark about Slovenia below). It is somewhat dubious

4420:

there is a missing word here: "By 1995, balance of power significantly changed. Serb forces in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina combined were estimated to be capable of fielding at most 130,000 troops. " Perhaps "By 1995, the balance of power had shifted significantly. Combined, Serb forces in

4296:

this needs tweaking: "However, since the soldiers were defending their homeland and their families the army was exceptionally motivated, and was formed into local fighting units—so people from a village would defend their own village—which meant they were fairly effective in their home grounds."

3544:

I have tried to fix some examples, but there is a mixture of US and British English spelling, for example: Croatian Defence Council (is the proper noun Defence, or should it be Defense); programme, kilometres, favoured, armoured, manoeuvre, Home Defence Regiments. Overall the article appears to

2605:

Well the responses took a bit longer, but I hope their quality benefited from that. I have tried to address all the issues you brought up - I believe the article genuinely benefited from this review. Once again, thanks for your effort. I hope the improvements warrant your support in this A-class

2342:

I must say I like the end result... It is a summary now, looks good, and breaking it up would not do any good. I'd like to suggest a following reordering, though: 1) Move "During the war" section under the "Course of the war" level 1 section (possibly retitled as "Serbia's role in the war"; say,

1992:

so I removed the claim and left the info supported by the sources for readers to draw this or another conclusion. The section on war crimes is now reorganized a bit, additional sources are added to support hitherto unsupported claims and information on Norac sentence, Ademi acquittal and Bobetko

1740:

Article 5 of the Statute: "The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute persons responsible for the following crimes when committed in armed conflict, whether international or internal in character, and directed against any civilian population". Therefore, my point was not valid.

1470:

as a "conflict" by all means might be considered euphemistic, I don't see real evidence of such use. The NYT source is not helpful in this respect because it is dated June 1991, still some months short of the first large-scale battles and the first substantial casualties, i.e. back then the word

3784:

From what I could see your changes look quite good. I'm still having serious trouble fully loading the article (it might be because of its size, or that my computer was built in the Stone Age), so I haven't been able to review the sources, check the image licences and fully read the paragraphs,

714:

Overall, this is a longish section; initially I thought it was too long, but I'd say now that it's very important to provide proper context. It is also difficult to write for the same reason. I'd also rate it as very good. What is a bit lacking for my taste: the role of the media, the impact of

2154:

I'd definitely agree with Tomobe that the final prose section of the article should be something along the lines of "aftermath of the war extended to the present day", which is more or less Croatia-Serbia relations: reconciliation (or lack thereof), lawsuits, war crimes trials, missing persons

4460:

there is a missing word here as well as a punctuation issue: "On the other hand, Croatian Army, Croatian Defence Council (Croatian: Hrvatsko vijeće obrane) (HVO) and Army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina could field a combined force of 250,000 soldiers. In addition the three forces

565:

I reorganized the paragraph to center on the Badinter Commission, which was pivotal for EEC recognition of Croatia and dissolution of SFR Yugoslavia, and moved the paragraph to proper location (chronologically) - the second half of 1991 when the Commission did bulk of its work. Additionally I

618:

The map you refer to was made by the CIA. It was published in book "Balkan Battlegrounds" which I cannot find online or offline. Corps referenced by the map are accurately located but that's about it. However, looking at two long arrows stretching from general area of Požega to Križevci (or

3577:

If it is normally translated in to BE spelling, then we could treat it as a proper noun and thus it would not need to be changed. I think the IDF usually use US spelling, so Israel Defense Force would be a proper noun and wouldn't be changed. I might be wrong in all of this, though.

260:

Resolved redirect to the appropriate section of the article to which that used to redirect, and changed "Yugoslav Republic of Croatia" to "Republic of Croatia, a constituent republic of..." to reduce possibility of confusion and provide some context even without proceeding down the

1987:

The claim you referred to indeed was not supported by any source. I suppose that the government did fund the unit, after all it was (as confirmed by cited sources) a reserve unit of the ministry of interior, and those are normally funded by governments. On the other hand, that's

882:

Moved the paragraph to "Military forces" as the info really belongs there, trimmed down the 1981 info substantially, simply observing that there was a similar situation back then. Added reference to instruction to eliminate Slovenes/Croats from the JNA given prior to the war in

2246:

Regarding those two sections: they summarize the subject and provide figures and aftermath, so they make sense here. Using a separate section just for the purpose of driving a point home is probably not a good idea. (Of course, I'm not saying that was the original idea here.)

359:

This discrepancy is resolved then. However, my comment regarding the exact area was a general one, not specifically related to the intro itself. This means that while the article body should go for exact figure, an approximate one would still be good enough for the intro.

3283:

in the Background section, this is not grammatically correct: "The fourth vote was provided by Montenegro, whose government survived a coup d'état in October 1988, but not second in January 1989" (there is a word missing; it should be "1988, but not a second one

3659:, e.g "Anatomy of deceit: an American physician's first-hand encounter with the realities of the war in Croatia" should be "Anatomy of Deceit: An American Physician's First-hand Encounter with the Realities of the War in Croatia" (there are other examples also); 1929:

Thanks for the tip, I'd like to keep the link, as I honestly expect that people are generally unsure exactly how many zeros are there in the quadrillion (and to make sure that it is not a zillion). I looked at the page and never realized it was a disambiguation

619:

thereabout) the map appears to be an amalgamation of actual JNA movements and general assumptions on possibly planned movements. I would say the map may be used, at best, as an illustration of what the US analysts thought the JNA intended at one time or another.

3857:

in the Serbian forces subsection, this sentence is not grammatically correct: "The JNA was initially formed during World War II to carry out guerrilla warfare against Axis powers occupation." (perhaps: "to carry out guerrilla warfare against occupying Axis

3026:

does not prohibit left aligned images set against a sidebar/infobox, rather sandwiching text between two images.) My screen resolution is 1366x768 so it tends to bring images closer together than vertically than some other setups as the text gets drawn out

1787:...at least for Croatia. I seem to be unable to trace a reliable source for similar information on Serb casualties at this time that could be reliably said to be related to Croatian War of Independence alone. I suspect some of the 3,500+3,500 specified 3022:

out of the template it renders just fine, although a couple of right-aligned images are pushed down. IMO that could be fixed by avoiding right-aligned images in the first few sections, say, down to Military forces or so. (Contrary to "popular belief"

2454:

Spelling and grammar seem to be reasonably good, but in this area I'll defer to what the native speakers say. A copyedit might be useful - not just spelling and grammar, but MoS stuff too (e.g. dashes). Editing for better flow is definitely needed.

1053:

Two problems remain: 1) "marred by war crimes" is followed by "the alleged crimes", a bit of a non sequitur (if it's reasonably clear that war crimes actually took place, and I'd say that it is, then I guess "alleged" might as well be dropped; what

307:

Believe it or not, both figures are correct. I suppose the above source and 13,913 km2 figure for RSK area size can be accepted as reliable. Starting from there, add 270 km2 and 1440 km2 that were once occupied, but recaptured by HV in late 1991

1591:

Moved the non-declared nature of the war to the end of the subsection as it is not as important as international/internal characterization. Further referenced Serbian position on internal war. Your objection on non-declaration of the war as a

2287:

Actually there is a room to improve this subsection (regardless whether it's contents are eventually moved or not) so I'll do that first. That should not be a major effort, and when it's done, maybe we'll be able to "have our cake and eat it

295:

Two things that might be spelled out in the intro: the war damage figure(s) and the exact area that was held by the RSK. Regarding the latter: the article says "approximately 30 percent"; IIRC, the figure was around 29%. Oddly, according to

3558:

as I'm not sure how to proceed there. Their official name is in Croatian, and it is normally translated in BE spelling. Would it be better to change it to US or keep it as is. As a possible guidance for me here, would a non-US text change

813:

to leave Yugoslavia, so let them go; we'll focus on those who don't want to leave, i.e. the Serbs of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was a strategic decision rather than an outright failure. (And no, I don't have a source for that.)

112:

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because the article has been recently listed as GA with no major objections and since I believe that all five A-class criteria are either met or reasonably close to warrant a serious review.

2894: 694:

dubious since it entailed support of Slovene/Croatian TOs and a technically/technologically superior adversary, frontline bases in Maribor, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Zagreb, Jastrebarsko etc. all of which obviously did not apply in 1991.--

136:

meant to be submitted here, so it was not written with A-class (or any other) formal criteria in mind. Please, take it at face falue. Needless to say, other editors are by all means encouraged to post their own comments and opinions.

1791:

are related to Bosnia and Herzegovina, some to Kosovo and an unidentified portion to Croatia. Furthermore there's no way to tell what type of disabilities does that figure include. I'll keep on searching, maybe something turns up

1134:

Got the other "allegation"... I'll distill that extra info into something smaller and equally useful. As for article size, prose is still below 80K. Admittedly entire article is much larger, but still far below 400K cautioned by

2087:

That is one point I disagree. It would go hand in hand with hidding any involvement of Serbia in the war. The complaint here is baseless. We could simply have two sections: "Serbia's role in the war" and "Situation after the

1139:. Still, I agree that it should not be expanded beyond reason. There's no problem about what you call "being a nuisance" - I figure the whole point of any serious review is to have other people detect what could be improved.-- 635:

that plan and the scaled down plan for occupation of a more or less specific area in Croatia was partially hindered, i.e. that the JNA did not advance as far as it wanted to (ostensibly due to resistance and personnel issues).

4178:

core of the new armed force—initially named "Croatian National Guard" (Croatian: Zbor narodne garde), later "Croatian Army" (Croatian: Hrvatska vojska)—that was formed on April 11, 1991, but not really developed until 1993";

4297:

Perhaps try: "However, since the soldiers were defending their homeland and their families, the army was very motivated and was formed into local fighting units. Fighting in their local area, they proved quiet effective";

1806:

Looks good to me, even without the details. It would be good to have the number and status of disabled people on the Serb side, but this is a complete mystery to me, I don't think I've ever seen any media coverage of it.

2194:

a role in the war (regardless of how one understands what "Serbia" and "role" mean), but whether it was a belligerent or not is a tricky question. My remark - like some other remarks in this review - did not address the

4017:

like the White Eagles, Serbian Guard, Dušan Silni or the Serb Volunteer Guard, which committed a number of massacres against Croat and other non-Serb civilians, were increasingly used by the Yugoslav and Serb forces";

485:

Actually I kept the sentence - sort of. The idea was to provide a context - to illustrate perception of the Serbs in Croatia. The sentence has been reworded, reorganized and expanded a little bit, with an appropriate

2478:

Finally, I'd like to recommend the following high-quality source. It might be particularly useful for strengthening some less-developed aspects of the article (a general overview of military tactics, to name one).

668:

This is a very detailed and well thought-out analysis. I think we are in full agreement now. It boils down to this: 1) the CIA map is in itself not problematic as a source, if properly introduced, 2) JNA indeed

3785:

sorry. I'll see if another reviewer might be able to do this, by leaving a note on the project talk page. One other suggestion that I have is for alt text to be added to the images. Guidance can be found here:

2713:, displayed in italics, not the publisher). For websites, the situation is a bit less clear: one might say that the work is e.g. "icty.org" or say that the publisher is the ICTY, or both. Not sure on this one. 2765:

I think there's no need to specify here all the other important params that should generally be provided: language, publisher (for books mostly), isbn/issn, format, etc. These are mostly fine from what I can

4375:

there is a missing word, capitalisation and flow issue issue here: "Seizing of JNA's barracks in the Battle of the barracks would alleviate the problem of equipment shortage." Perhaps: "The seizure of the

3394:

in the War crimes and the ICTY section, this is not grammatically correct: "was convicted to a jail sentence by a Croatian court" (maybe reword to "convicted of a crime and sentenced to jail by a Croatian

2232:

point it out. An average reader will definitely not read the whole article, but only scroll down to the section where Serbia's role is mentioned and summed up. I'm sure you can economize somewhere else.--

2895:

http://books.google.hr/books?id=gmRbRwAACAAJ&dq=Srpska+pobuna+u+Hrvatskoj+1990-1995&hl=hr&ei=Bg0JTeXXH8-UswbSyeiTAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAA

316:

to have been occupied - and 1368 km2 is area size of the diocese). Granted, the three figures are approximate, but even the RSK reported size may or may not comprise further 90 km2 retaken by the HV in

1120:

violation now, especially since the article size might be close to becoming a concern. Simply saying that one side claims there was a battle while the other denies it should probably be enough here.

506:

The Serb influence was indeed disproportionate at times. In 1989, 30% of the members of the Croatian League of Communists were Serbs, while their overall percentage in the republic was less than 13%.

4099:

in the Croatian forces subsection, "By contrast to that force, Croatian military was in a much worse state." Perhaps try: "In contrast to the Serbs, the Croatian military was in a much worse state";

2463:

prior to the GA nomination, but I agree that substantial changes were made in the meantime to warrant another copyedit. I plan to request one after issues brought up by this review are addressed.--

1604:

consequence of the view that the war is internal - those are not declared by default. In that respect provided info why Croatia (Tuđman) never declared the war and reference to support the claim.--

3616:

in the Notes section there appears to be an inconsistent style in presenting accessdates: e.g. Note # 18 "January 17, 2011", but Note # 21 "Retrieved 2010-02-07". There are many examples of this;

1025:

Indeed I seem to be unable to find a reliable source to support the assertion made in the article. I'll search some more and see what comes up - and then rewrite the passage if necessary.--

1993:

exemption (health) is added and referenced. Likewise Glavaš is now briefly mentioned as important instance of national judiciary processing high ranking officials (MPs for that matter).--

3235:

I admit it is a bit unwieldy. As a stopgap measure, I punctuated a dependent clause using em dashes and replacing "former" with a proper name. I'll give it some more thought for sure.--

149:

This sentence seems disconnected with the rest of the paragraph, and it is unclear what "also" refers to. Perhaps the quote should be incorporated in the following paragraph, say after

2162:

However, I'm aware this may turn into a major rewrite, affecting many parts of the article, so it is definitely wise to wait and hear other comments before making substantial changes.

1708:

If the ICTY's jurisdiction is indeed not limited by the type of the conflict (do you have a source for that?), then there's no conflict of interest, and my remark would not be valid.

1039:

Actually, the entire subsection was somehow wanting. I rewrote some of it and reorganized most remaining text in the subsection - I think only the last paragraph was left as it was.--

673:

a radical plan in the early days, 3) it is bit risky to "connect the dots" between points 1) and 2) due to WP:SYNTH. The caption now reflects this, so the issue is indeed settled.

1559:

in this respect. (Well, at least in the absence of sources that make explicit inferences of the sort.) "War not declared" bit might simply be dropped without any loss of context.

3003:

Well, the sidebar was initially under the infobox, and because of that there was a huge space between two name section's: 'Background' & 'Rise of nationalism in Yugoslavia'.

1672:

So the armed conflict in the former Yugoslavia should be considered international as from 8 October 1991 because the independence of these two States was definite on that date.

1499:

Since the "euphemism" seems to serve no purpose at all other than draining good will and energy away from reviewers and editors alike, I thought it best be removed and marked

2955:"History of Croatia" sidebar is taking away horizontal space which would be useful for so many references in the section. Move it elsewhere, perhaps? (Just a suggestion...) 1466:

Bjelajac, Žunec et al. also refer to it as a "conflict" several times in their paper, although, of course, they primarily describe it as a "war". While describing this war

3088:. Added ODP template linking site containing a number of articles, including ones that were found in this section (those links were consequently removed as redundant).-- 21: 3466:

in contrast to the point above, "president Josipović" should be "President Josipović" in this case because it is his title, as opposed to "Josipovic was the president";

2590:

Thanks for the time and effort you took to review this article. I've already addressed some of your remarks, and I plan to do the remaining ones within a day or so...--

1448: 3102:

Much better, but the "Movies and documentaries" section looks malformed for some reason, with bare external links. The previous layout looked fine to me. Anyway, the

1888:...well sort of. I provided info on what comprises the figures specified. Additionally military spending was described in proportion to overall government spending.-- 2343:

before or after "Type and name of the war"), because it does not actually belong to the aftermath, 2) Make "After the war" a level 1 section (and possibly retitle).

3355:

in the Croation forces section, "...later "Croatian Army" (Croatian: Hrvatska vojska) - that was formed on April 11" (the hyphen here should be an unspaced emdash);

2544:

This is a very complex subject and a substantial article, so I've likely missed a number of things - I'll post more and/or provide further comments, time allowing.

4138:

in the Croatian forces subsection, "At the early stages of the war, lack of military..." This should be: "In the early stages of the war, the lack of military...";

1295: 4625:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1016:

the successful Operation Medak pocket in 1993 caused sharp reactions of countries and organizations that had anti-Croatian and pro-Serb attitude during the war

1683:

far as big blue quote boxes are concerned, I moved one of those (Tadić case) to a quote parameter of the existing reference. I'm inclined to consider this

1535:

Since neither Croatia or Yugoslavia declared war on each other, a prevailing view in Serbia was that it was a civil war between Croats and Serbs in Croatia

1168:

I've removed the details as discussed, those would probably be better off in the article on the battle itself anyway. Do you think this setup could work?--

1316:

IIRC, the guard brigades were manned by professional soldiers, while the other units used mobilized personnel. If sourced, might be important to mention.

2065:- I think this section's content is best incorporated in the preceding sections. In this case, the rest of the section would need to be reorganized too. 3067:

In the External links: "International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia , World Courts and Sense " is ugly and should be properly formatted.

1247:

Indeed it is relatively minor. Removed Lučko attack from the section and added Lučko to the list of attacked towns, moving the reference accordingly.--

830:... at least I think so. Earlier today I expanded this bit and added a reference for the planning or at least decision making involved (Jović diary).-- 4610: 4594: 4571: 4553: 4538: 4520: 4500: 4470: 4449: 4409: 4364: 4325: 4285: 4245: 4206: 4166: 4127: 4088: 4045: 4005: 3966: 3926: 3886: 3846: 3812: 3798: 3779: 3761: 3731: 3705: 3691: 3644: 3601: 3587: 3572: 3533: 3494: 3455: 3383: 3344: 3244: 3206: 3191: 3171: 3143: 3125: 3097: 3050: 3036: 3016: 2998: 2984: 2969: 2944: 2920: 2888: 2854: 2823: 2799: 2785: 2733: 2672: 2658: 2644: 2630: 2615: 2599: 2582: 2568: 2553: 2536: 2472: 2437: 2371: 2352: 2337: 2323: 2297: 2270: 2256: 2241: 2212: 2185: 2171: 2130: 2116: 2097: 2082: 2044: 2020: 2002: 1953: 1939: 1914: 1897: 1862: 1816: 1801: 1750: 1735: 1717: 1703: 1652: 1638: 1613: 1586: 1568: 1553: 1519: 1494: 1480: 1460: 1419: 1384: 1342: 1307: 1256: 1217: 1192: 1177: 1148: 1129: 1103: 1089: 1071: 1048: 1034: 991: 954: 940: 918:

In August 1991, the border city of Vukovar came under attack and the Battle of Vukovar began. Serbian troops eventually completely surrounded the city

906: 892: 853: 839: 781: 767: 753: 739: 703: 682: 663: 589: 575: 550: 517: 495: 456: 418: 369: 354: 330: 284: 270: 231: 194: 180: 122: 53: 4529:

long, but it's a matter of seconds for me, on an average connection (2 Mbit/s), tried with Firefox 3, Chrome, and MSIE 8. It is only slow in MSIE 6.

3803:

Thanks for the review and thanks for the invite for other MILHIST contributors. I definitely plan to place alt text where suitable fairly shortly.--

2635:

I can say now that all my substantial remarks have been addressed. The additional remarks, as described above, will be added in the next 24 hours.

92: 3977:

there is a missing word here: "new conscripts proved ineffective fighting force". Try: "the new conscripts proved an ineffective fighting force";

3223:: I have made a few edits but am having trouble loading the article with my internet connection, so I will list some of the issues I am seeing: 1537:. Both facts are true (#1 - the war wasn't declared, #2 - the Serbs see it as a civil war), but the inference seems faulty to me. Unreferenced. 1058:

alleged was their guilt), and 2) one should take into account that the Croatian-Canadian battle is IIRC still flatly denied by the HV, and the

17: 3635:

GregorB already pointed out varying date formats, but I neglected the notes. Now they should be uniform, as I think I got them all.--

97: 2564: 2433: 2333: 2266: 2237: 2126: 2093: 735: 452: 318: 1675:

on this point, since this is clearly presented as ICTY's viewpoint, but still - prominent display with two big blue quote boxes...

1094:

I provided info and sources for Croatian (and apparently UN) interpretation of the events with sources. Hope that turns out ok.--

501: 427: 240: 1871:

Wartime damage - just direct, or indirect too? (Likely the former, the figures seem low.) Info on methodology would be useful.

4601:

Anyway, thanks for the effort. The article has been significantly improved, and your help is welcome in the future. Regards,

2073:

I'd like to keep the section like this at least for a short while, to wait and see what other reviewers think of this idea.--

1274: 392:

The bit about the formation of political parties in 1989 should probably precede the part about the actual elections in 1990.

4562:. Printing to PDF is also a good idea, if you have that option. You might want to wait for Diannaa to finish her run first. 3041:

No worries - the sidebar should be placed where it's least disruptive, and if that's the references section, then so be it.

39:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2176:

I have left you a comment on article's talk page (during discussion about Infobox) regerding this. See what do you think.

744:

I'd say that reordering the content, and adding info about the SDS and the rally is a major improvement to this section.

2560: 2429: 2329: 2262: 2233: 2135:

Okay, I was going to call it a day regarding the comments here and continue tomorrow, but let me just respond to this...

2122: 2089: 731: 448: 59: 2649:

Once again thanks for the time you took to review this article, hope this earns your support for A-class promotion!--

2261:

This section is also there to summarize and provide an aftermath. So please drop it and let's all be friends again.--

4558:

That's too bad. There might still be a possibility to read it offline, by saving it as MHT first (MSIE only), or by

3116:

of a video serves as a reference, not for merely saying "this film exists" (IMDb is generally sufficient for this).

2527:

Interestingly, I stumbled upon the same text in English few days ago (it's in use now). Thanks for the tip though!--

920:. The first sentence is a bit of an oversimplification. Still, I'm not sure if going into details would help either. 799:

No objections here, a solid overview. More information on tactics would be useful (not necessarily in this section).

654:

so I've changed the caption where the claim is made to what is actually communicated by the source (CIA book/map).--

4590: 4549: 4466: 3794: 3727: 3701: 3583: 3182:

Right now I can only extend my hope that additional editors will join in, there is still enough time for a review.

580:

Very good. Like some other changes discussed here, this is not merely a fix, but rather a substantial improvement.

566:

provided an extra reference establishing importance of the 1974 constitution to the commission's decision making.--

539:

Actually, no, but it should not be in this exact spot either. Plus it's written virtually backwards. I'm on it now.

3789:. I'll try to come back to this article tomorrow and hopefully by then my connection will have improved. Regards, 3255:

in the lead, "and both the Serbia-controlled Yugoslav People's Army". I think this should be "Serb-controlled...";

3555: 2103:

like to have other reviewers feedback on this one before committing to any course of action (or inaction per

3505:

Electoral and consistutional moves section, is this correct: "anti-Yugounitarist" (Yugo unitarist perhaps?);

3005:

see end of a section 'operations in the timeline (previously in the campaign box)' on a article's talk page.

409:

That particular area was reorganized earlier today exactly in this way. I also think it's better that way.--

312:, and another 684 km2 occupied near Dubrovnik (this figure is approximate, one half of Dubrovnik Diocese is 3423:"The disaster was prevented by Mark Nicholas Gray, a Colonel in..." (incorrect capitalisation of rank, per 4377: 4057: 1059: 345:

as suggested, specifying only RSK 1992 size in the lead and specifying details in the main article text.--

297: 4586: 4545: 4462: 3790: 3723: 3697: 3579: 3312:

in the Croatian forces and the First armed incidents sections, the emdashes are incorrectly spaced. Per

2573:

On the contrary, looks better now. Unfortunately, inserting content in the list resets the numbering...

2156: 1833: 3833:

I'll try to find some of those myself, but just to be on the safe side, I asked a WP:GOCE copyeditor (

650:

On another thought, even though the above is, IMO, logical and valid reasoning, that would constitute

3560: 601:

The JNA was unable to advance as far as planned due to Croatian resistance and mobilization problems.

2428:

Added references to the movies I found (Including "Storm Above the Krajina"), others were removed.--

466:

Serbs occupied a disproportionate number of state posts throughout Yugoslavia, including in Croatia.

3226:

in the lead, the first sentence is quite convoluted and probably would benefit from being split up;

3155:

We've touched the issue of article size: although it is quite big (72 kb of prose, and also in the

3106: 2872: 2808: 1989: 651: 2790:

I did most of them, I still have to find out proper way to reference movies and documentaries...--

4516:

long. My internet connection is relatively fast, and it still takes about 20–30 seconds to load.

4496: 4445: 4405: 4360: 4321: 4281: 4202: 4123: 4084: 4041: 3842: 3808: 3775: 3757: 3687: 3640: 3597: 3568: 3529: 3490: 3451: 3379: 3340: 3240: 3093: 3032: 2980: 2940: 2916: 2850: 2795: 2781: 2729: 2654: 2611: 2595: 2532: 2468: 2367: 2319: 2293: 2112: 2078: 2040: 1998: 1935: 1893: 1858: 1797: 1731: 1699: 1634: 1609: 1582: 1549: 1515: 1490: 1456: 1415: 1338: 1303: 1252: 1213: 1173: 1144: 1099: 1085: 1044: 1030: 987: 936: 888: 835: 777: 699: 659: 571: 546: 491: 414: 350: 326: 266: 227: 176: 118: 73: 1977: 1226:

Lučko rocket attack seems fairly unimportant (no fatalities, minor damage). E.g. the attack on

4567: 4534: 3679: 3656: 3187: 3167: 3156: 3139: 3121: 3046: 2994: 2893:

For Google Books one might trim the URL junk so that id is the only parameter remaining. E.g.

2884: 2819: 2668: 2640: 2626: 2578: 2549: 2348: 2252: 2208: 2167: 2016: 1949: 1812: 1746: 1713: 1648: 1564: 1476: 1188: 1125: 1067: 950: 928: 902: 849: 763: 749: 678: 585: 513: 365: 280: 190: 1112:(But not in the same section!) Also, while the section's content is fine, there is perhaps a 4606: 4241: 4162: 4001: 3962: 3922: 3882: 3424: 3202: 3012: 2965: 2181: 1910: 1380: 1117: 531:

This entire paragraph seems out of place. I'd say it belongs to one of the earlier sections.

468:

The sentence is disconnected with the rest, should be moved elsewhere or removed altogether.

1770:

Also disabled people. PTSD might be mentioned too in this context. No objections otherwise.

1544:

This is changed now and references are added, could you please have another look at this?--

4217:"WW2" this abbreviation is a bit informal, it is probably best just to say "World War II"; 3563:

to Israel Defence Force? Of course I'll scan the text for other similar inconsistencies.--

2876: 2502: 2359: 2104: 1227: 730:

Added Petrova gora rally, hope it is enough because it really is a long section already.--

4421:

Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina were capable of fielding an estimated 130,000 troops";

2621:

then I'm going to provide some additional technical remarks regarding referencing style.

1905:

now appears as a disambiguation page, and should be fixed...maybe to de-link it.... :-)

500:

This is much better. (Again, this was a flow rather than a content problem.) Also, from

3719: 3313: 2830:

so I'll prepare (hopefully) those in my sandbox and paste those into the article later.

2460: 1136: 309: 48: 4517: 4492: 4441: 4401: 4356: 4317: 4277: 4198: 4119: 4080: 4037: 3838: 3804: 3786: 3771: 3753: 3683: 3636: 3593: 3564: 3525: 3486: 3447: 3375: 3336: 3236: 3089: 3085: 3028: 2976: 2936: 2912: 2846: 2791: 2777: 2725: 2650: 2607: 2591: 2528: 2464: 2363: 2315: 2289: 2108: 2074: 2036: 1994: 1931: 1889: 1854: 1793: 1727: 1695: 1630: 1605: 1578: 1545: 1511: 1486: 1452: 1411: 1334: 1299: 1248: 1209: 1169: 1140: 1095: 1081: 1040: 1026: 983: 932: 884: 831: 773: 695: 655: 567: 542: 487: 410: 346: 322: 262: 223: 172: 114: 69: 4563: 4530: 3834: 3183: 3163: 3135: 3117: 3042: 2990: 2880: 2815: 2664: 2636: 2622: 2574: 2545: 2344: 2248: 2204: 2163: 2012: 1945: 1808: 1742: 1709: 1644: 1560: 1472: 1184: 1121: 1113: 1063: 946: 898: 845: 759: 745: 674: 581: 509: 361: 276: 186: 3718:

in the References section, the date ranges in the titles should have endashes per

2559:

I placed numbers in your remarks to make a better overview, hope you don't mind.--

3335:

Removed those spacings as well as further instances that appeared in the notes.--

2694:

param (except, perhaps, Google Books and such - does not really make much sense).

132:

Here is a review of the article. First, a disclaimer: this review was originally

4602: 4237: 4158: 3997: 3958: 3918: 3878: 3446:

as suggested. Found a few incorrectly capitalized generals and fixed them too.--

3198: 3008: 2961: 2494: 2486: 2177: 1906: 1902: 1618:

After another look, this seems decent to me now, so I am tempted to consider it

1376: 2898: 430:

is not mentioned at all in the article. It might be introduced in this section.

3524:

Yes that was clumsy - now it's slightly reworded to avoid the double prefix.--

3023: 313: 3197:

Thanks GregorB for your extensive review and your final 'Support'. Regerds,

3162:

These are my final comments. One pass through the refs should be enough...

3159:

top 100), I still don't think this is a significant problem at the moment.

2303:

IMO, justifies a summary such as this one. If that's OK, I'd consider this

300:, the total area was 13,913 km, which would be significantly less than 29%. 2121:

I say keep it. Don't even understand why it was brought up here, anyway.--

529:

Important factors in Croatia's preservation of its pre-war borders were...

3696:

I think you are correct. I don't think it applies to non-English titles.

1980:

would provide more solid evidence for government involvement in general.

612:

I'd like to try and break this down a bit and ask you for some feedback:

1271:

The war was originally fought between HVO and Croatian volunteer troops

3682:

correctly that does not apply to non-English titles, or am I wrong?--

1788: 2871:

Given the number of references, it would be convenient to implement

2663:

Let's just say that things are moving in the right direction... :-)

2358:

I'm not sure the article would benefit significantly from the move (

3134:

an URL. I'd say that, with a wikilink supplied, URL is redundant.

2828:

A WP:GOCE copyedit of the article seems to be underway right now,

2035:

Thanks for the tip - that's a major difference in circumstances.--

604:

whether the map corresponds to anything that was actually planned.

3898:

force consisted primarily of T-54/55 tanks and MiG-21 aircraft");

965:

Some inconsistencies in date formatting (month-first, day-first).

3655:

in the References section, the titles should be capitalised per

3592:

From what I can find, indeed the BE spelling is normally used.--

2686:

The following are the additional remarks regarding referencing:

1447:

is use of euphemism by definition. The source for such a use is

810:

In July, in an attempt to salvage what remained of Yugoslavia...

758:

But translation of Petrova Gora is not really necessary here...

3770:

Thanks for your comments, I'll fix those as soon as possible.--

2411:- even discussed by the Croatian parliament (see source below). 2143:, and I don't think that the article exactly makes it a secret. 2909:

working on this one simultaneously with the cite parameters...

1723: 1451:

and it is referenced at the end of that particular sentence.--

1230:

in 1991 might be seen as more important, but is not mentioned.

205:

ICTY needs to be expanded on the first use. UNPROFOR likewise.

2750:

might be provided too where applicable. Notes apparently use

2746:

if possible. From what I can see, this is generally OK, but

1976:- does the source support that? A (dishonorable) mention of 1600:

was spot on: The non-declaration by Serbia/Yugoslavia is an

1471:"war" may have still legitimately felt too strong for some. 2159:), and what have you, this is just off the top of my head. 2011:, but he was still an incumbent MP when he was convicted. 3130:

OK, I get it now: one cannot use both a wikilinked title

623:

in terms of attempts/plans of the JNA to advance further.

243:

is now a redirect. Should be fixed/clarified in some way.

185:

This was primarily a flow problem. Looks good to me now.

102: 3427:, it should be "colonel" when not being used as a title; 382:

Overall, the intro is very good, I'd even say excellent.

4559: 2758:, unlike the references. This is probably preferred to 2503:

http://ponude.biz/knjige/r/Rat%20u%20Hrvatskoj91-95.pdf

1974:

the Croatian government reportedly funded a covert unit

147:

The ICTY also condemned a "widespread and systematic...

3485:

that as well as other presidents and some ministers.--

3084:

as suggested, also formatted other ones to conform to

2720:

Actually, for newspapers, the template page specifies

2404:(director unknown)" - can't even be googled to verify. 2834:

I believe I got them all now, so I think this may be

3007:

Maybe Tomobe03 will have some good idea about this?

1436:- this does not seem to be supported by the sources. 2762:, but I wouldn't call this inconsistency a problem. 2007:Looks good. One minor thing: Glavaš is a former MP 1443:My point was that calling a war (small or large) a 3545:favour US spelling so it should all be consistent; 1108:Well... (I really hate being a nuisance... :-) ) 3112:template is generally meant to be used when the 2697:All (or almost all?) sources should provide the 2508:, apparently the same as the two-part text above 2147:description of the events, and that's precisely 931:, I feel there is sufficient information here.-- 3554:I corrected the ones you specified, except for 2701:param. For newspapers, this is the newspaper's 2141:one of the defining characteristics of this war 927:Since there already is a wikilinked article on 508:Might be true, but is unfortunately unsourced. 1726:and it is referenced in the section on ICTY.-- 1296:Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2495:http://www.zamirzine.net/spip.php?article5751 2487:http://www.zamirzine.net/spip.php?article5669 447:The Serb Democratic Party is now mentioned.-- 8: 2899:http://books.google.hr/books?id=gmRbRwAACAAJ 2397:"In media" sounds better as a section title. 2989:Sidebar might be placed under the infobox. 2407:One notable documentary that is missing is 1485:Good point, I'll look into that shortly.-- 81: 2151:it is not a some kind of a one-off issue. 1596:for characterization of the conflict as 4197:I gave it a go, how about this setup?-- 2155:search, integration processes (such as 1836:, even if it's linked in the paragraph. 84: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2698: 2691: 2690:All online sources should provide the 844:Okay. The Jović diary bit is a bonus. 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 2400:No references. The worst example is " 7: 4056:I suggest wikilinking "officers" to 33:The following discussion is closed. 4583:Neutral (neither support or oppose) 4525:This is interesting... The article 1294:per suggestion, except they fought 2724:parameter, so I'll use that one.-- 28: 4619:The discussion above is closed. 3938:AGM-65 Maverick guided missiles"; 2960:Any suggestion where to move it? 1110:The "alleged" bit is still there. 1062:does not give a definite answer. 4482: 4431: 4391: 4346: 4307: 4267: 4227: 4188: 4148: 4109: 4070: 4027: 3987: 3948: 3908: 3868: 3743: 3678:per suggestion. If I understood 3669: 3626: 3515: 3476: 3437: 3405: 3365: 3326: 3294: 3265: 3075: 2926: 2836: 2518: 2419: 2305: 2026: 1920: 1879: 1844: 1778: 1685: 1620: 1501: 1401: 1367: 1324: 1285: 1238: 1199: 973: 873: 821: 721: 641: 556: 476: 438: 400: 336: 251: 213: 161: 3425:Knowledge:MILMOS#Capitalization 1827:"Wartime damage and minefields" 1277:rather than amongst themselves. 502:League of Communists of Croatia 241:Republic of Croatia (1990-1991) 2774:working on citation parameters 2459:The article was copyedited by 1275:Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina 1005:No particular objections here. 1: 4544:job copyediting the article. 3680:WP:MOSCAPS#Composition titles 3657:WP:MOSCAPS#Composition titles 2901:. Purely cosmetic, of course. 1832:I'd expect a seealso link to 865:say cut out the 1981 figures. 54:15:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC) 4611:23:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 4595:10:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 4572:12:43, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 4554:03:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 4539:19:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 4521:18:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 4501:11:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4471:04:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4450:11:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4410:11:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4365:11:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4326:11:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4286:11:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4246:11:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4207:11:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4167:11:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4128:10:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4089:10:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4046:10:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 4006:10:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 3967:10:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 3927:10:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 3887:10:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 3847:11:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC) 3837:) to help with this issue.-- 3813:16:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3799:13:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3780:05:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3762:10:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3732:05:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3706:13:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3692:10:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3645:09:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3602:22:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 3588:13:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3573:06:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3534:08:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3495:09:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3456:08:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3384:10:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3345:10:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3245:11:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 3207:23:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 3192:14:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 3172:21:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC) 3144:22:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 3126:10:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 3098:14:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC) 3051:21:59, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 3037:16:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 3017:09:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2999:08:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2985:01:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2970:23:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC) 2945:21:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2921:13:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2889:21:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC) 2855:17:17, 30 January 2011 (UTC) 2824:21:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2800:21:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2786:13:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2734:13:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2673:23:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 2659:22:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 2645:22:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 2631:16:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 2616:14:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 2600:17:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 2583:16:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 2569:15:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 2554:14:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 2537:01:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 2483:Rat u Hrvatskoj, 1991-1995. 2473:15:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 2438:16:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 2372:23:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 2353:13:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 2338:17:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 2324:14:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 2298:16:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2271:13:31, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2257:12:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2242:11:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 2213:18:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC) 2186:23:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC) 2172:22:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 2131:21:39, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 2117:20:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 2098:18:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 2083:16:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 2045:15:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 2021:15:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 2003:14:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 1954:15:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1940:21:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 1915:20:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 1898:13:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 1863:16:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1817:10:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1802:15:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 1751:16:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1736:16:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1718:16:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1704:16:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1694:unless I missed something.-- 1653:21:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1639:18:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1614:18:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1587:16:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1569:16:12, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1554:16:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1520:18:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1495:13:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1481:12:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 1461:17:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1420:16:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1385:20:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1343:01:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 1308:01:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 1273:. I believe they fought the 1257:16:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1218:22:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 1193:22:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 1178:21:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 1149:19:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 1130:18:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 1104:17:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 1090:15:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 1072:15:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 1049:16:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 1035:16:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 992:18:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 982:I think I got all of them.-- 955:17:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 941:17:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 907:22:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 893:00:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 854:17:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC) 840:16:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 782:18:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 768:19:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 754:19:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 740:20:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 704:21:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 683:16:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 664:10:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 590:15:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 576:11:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 551:03:10, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 518:10:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC) 496:01:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 457:20:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 419:15:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 370:19:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 355:15:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 331:13:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 285:19:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 271:19:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 232:15:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 195:19:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 181:19:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 123:13:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 60:Croatian War of Independence 3213:Remarks by AustralianRupert 2328:No objections. Great job!-- 1197:Then I'll mark this one as 4642: 3414:similar to the suggestion. 3316:they should not be spaced; 1428:"Type and name of the war" 1359:- should read "Serb-held". 2879:). By no means required. 1968:"War crimes and the ICTY" 1765:"Casualties and refugees" 1183:I think it's just right. 4622:Please do not modify it. 3556:Croatian Defence Council 310:in Otkos 10 and Orkan 91 36:Please do not modify it. 2561:Justice and Arbitration 2430:Justice and Arbitration 2330:Justice and Arbitration 2263:Justice and Arbitration 2234:Justice and Arbitration 2123:Justice and Arbitration 2090:Justice and Arbitration 1575:and I'm working on this 732:Justice and Arbitration 449:Justice and Arbitration 46:No consensus to promote 4058:Officer (armed forces) 171:text (ICTY section).-- 4560:downloading it as PDF 2875:using wikilinks (see 2157:Partnership for Peace 1834:Minefields in Croatia 428:Serb Democratic Party 151:thousands of refugees 3561:Israel Defense Force 2392:"In popular culture" 1643:And indeed it is... 1078:working on that one! 222:Ditto for UNTAES.-- 4491:per suggestion. -- 4440:per suggestion. -- 4400:per suggestion. -- 4355:per suggestion. -- 4316:per suggestion. -- 4276:per suggestion. -- 4236:per suggestion. -- 4157:per suggestion. -- 4118:per suggestion. -- 4079:per suggestion. -- 4036:per suggestion. -- 3996:per suggestion. -- 3957:per suggestion. -- 3917:per suggestion. -- 3877:per suggestion. -- 2707:The New York Times 2409:Oluja nad Krajinom 128:Remarks by GregorB 4512:- the article is 4060:on first mention; 3752:per suggestion.-- 3374:per suggestion.-- 3157:Special:LongPages 3006: 1853:per suggestion.-- 1333:per suggestion.-- 929:Battle of Vukovar 794:"Military forces" 110: 109: 78: 4633: 4624: 4587:AustralianRupert 4546:AustralianRupert 4490: 4486: 4485: 4463:AustralianRupert 4439: 4435: 4434: 4399: 4395: 4394: 4354: 4350: 4349: 4315: 4311: 4310: 4275: 4271: 4270: 4235: 4231: 4230: 4196: 4192: 4191: 4156: 4152: 4151: 4117: 4113: 4112: 4078: 4074: 4073: 4035: 4031: 4030: 3995: 3991: 3990: 3956: 3952: 3951: 3916: 3912: 3911: 3876: 3872: 3871: 3824:Further comments 3791:AustralianRupert 3751: 3747: 3746: 3724:AustralianRupert 3698:AustralianRupert 3677: 3673: 3672: 3634: 3630: 3629: 3580:AustralianRupert 3523: 3519: 3518: 3484: 3480: 3479: 3445: 3441: 3440: 3413: 3409: 3408: 3373: 3369: 3368: 3334: 3330: 3329: 3302: 3298: 3297: 3273: 3269: 3268: 3111: 3105: 3083: 3079: 3078: 3004: 2934: 2930: 2929: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2813: 2807: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2700: 2693: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2507: 2499: 2491: 2427: 2423: 2422: 2313: 2309: 2308: 2034: 2030: 2029: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1887: 1883: 1882: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1693: 1689: 1688: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1332: 1328: 1327: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1207: 1203: 1202: 981: 977: 976: 881: 877: 876: 829: 825: 824: 729: 725: 724: 649: 645: 644: 564: 560: 559: 484: 480: 479: 446: 442: 441: 408: 404: 403: 344: 340: 339: 319:Miljevci Plateau 259: 255: 254: 221: 217: 216: 169: 165: 164: 82: 66: 51: 38: 4641: 4640: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4620: 4483: 4481: 4432: 4430: 4392: 4390: 4347: 4345: 4308: 4306: 4268: 4266: 4228: 4226: 4189: 4187: 4149: 4147: 4110: 4108: 4071: 4069: 4028: 4026: 3988: 3986: 3949: 3947: 3909: 3907: 3869: 3867: 3744: 3742: 3670: 3668: 3627: 3625: 3516: 3514: 3477: 3475: 3438: 3436: 3406: 3404: 3366: 3364: 3327: 3325: 3303:per suggestion. 3295: 3293: 3274:per suggestion. 3266: 3264: 3215: 3109: 3103: 3076: 3074: 3027:horizontally.-- 2935:as suggested.-- 2927: 2925: 2837: 2835: 2811: 2805: 2519: 2517: 2505: 2497: 2489: 2420: 2418: 2306: 2304: 2190:Well... Serbia 2057:"Serbia's role" 2027: 2025: 1978:Branimir Glavaš 1921: 1919: 1880: 1878: 1845: 1843: 1779: 1777: 1686: 1684: 1621: 1619: 1502: 1500: 1402: 1400: 1368: 1366: 1325: 1323: 1286: 1284: 1239: 1237: 1228:Zagreb TV Tower 1200: 1198: 974: 972: 874: 872: 822: 820: 722: 720: 642: 640: 557: 555: 477: 475: 439: 437: 401: 399: 337: 335: 252: 250: 214: 212: 162: 160: 130: 63: 49: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 4639: 4637: 4628: 4627: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4598: 4597: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4378:JNA's barracks 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3828: 3827: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3214: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3069: 3068: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 2957: 2956: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2903: 2902: 2891: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2715: 2714: 2695: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2500: 2492: 2476: 2475: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2413: 2412: 2405: 2398: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2160: 2152: 2144: 2136: 2067: 2066: 2063:During the war 2059: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 1982: 1981: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1838: 1837: 1829: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1677: 1676: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1539: 1538: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1438: 1437: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1361: 1360: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1279: 1278: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1232: 1231: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1060:article itself 1020: 1019: 1012: 1011: 1007: 1006: 1002: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 994: 967: 966: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 922: 921: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 867: 866: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 815: 814: 806: 805: 801: 800: 796: 795: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 717: 716: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 637: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 606: 605: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 553: 533: 532: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 470: 469: 462: 461: 460: 459: 432: 431: 424: 423: 422: 421: 394: 393: 389: 388: 384: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 302: 301: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 245: 244: 237: 236: 235: 234: 207: 206: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 155: 154: 143: 142: 129: 126: 108: 107: 106: 105: 103:External links 100: 95: 87: 86: 80: 79: 68:Nominator(s): 62: 57: 43: 42: 41: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4638: 4626: 4623: 4617: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4599: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4581: 4573: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4551: 4547: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4528: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4519: 4515: 4511: 4510:Quick comment 4508: 4507: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4489: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4451: 4447: 4443: 4438: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4398: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4379: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4353: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4327: 4323: 4319: 4314: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4274: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4234: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4195: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4155: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4116: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4077: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4059: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4034: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3994: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3955: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3915: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3875: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3836: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3825: 3822: 3821: 3814: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3768: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3750: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3676: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3658: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3633: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3562: 3557: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3522: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3483: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3444: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3426: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3412: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3372: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3333: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3301: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3272: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3225: 3224: 3222: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3180: 3178: 3174: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3160: 3158: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3108: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3082: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3065: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3025: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2954: 2953: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2933: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2900: 2897:becomes just 2896: 2892: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2869: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2843: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2810: 2804:There's only 2803: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2764: 2741: 2740: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2696: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2525: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2504: 2501: 2498:(in Croatian) 2496: 2493: 2490:(in Croatian) 2488: 2485: 2484: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2452: 2446:Final remarks 2445: 2444: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2426: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2399: 2396: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2312: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2230: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2193: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2153: 2150: 2145: 2142: 2137: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1991: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1927: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1886: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1869: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1851: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1692: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1673: 1670: 1669: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1627: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1573:You're right 1572: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1469: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1408: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1393:OK otherwise. 1392: 1391: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1349: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1331: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1292: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1245: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1206: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1003: 999: 998: 993: 989: 985: 980: 971: 970: 969: 968: 964: 963: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 925: 924: 923: 919: 916: 915: 908: 904: 900: 896: 895: 894: 890: 886: 880: 871: 870: 869: 868: 863: 862: 855: 851: 847: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 828: 819: 818: 817: 816: 811: 808: 807: 803: 802: 798: 797: 793: 792: 783: 779: 775: 771: 770: 769: 765: 761: 757: 756: 755: 751: 747: 743: 742: 741: 737: 733: 728: 719: 718: 713: 712: 705: 701: 697: 692: 691: 684: 680: 676: 672: 667: 666: 665: 661: 657: 653: 648: 639: 638: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 610: 609: 608: 607: 602: 599: 598: 591: 587: 583: 579: 578: 577: 573: 569: 563: 554: 552: 548: 544: 540: 537: 536: 535: 534: 530: 527: 526: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 497: 493: 489: 483: 474: 473: 472: 471: 467: 464: 463: 458: 454: 450: 445: 436: 435: 434: 433: 429: 426: 425: 420: 416: 412: 407: 398: 397: 396: 395: 391: 390: 386: 385: 381: 380: 371: 367: 363: 358: 357: 356: 352: 348: 343: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 315: 311: 306: 305: 304: 303: 299: 294: 293: 286: 282: 278: 274: 273: 272: 268: 264: 258: 249: 248: 247: 246: 242: 239: 238: 233: 229: 225: 220: 211: 210: 209: 208: 204: 203: 196: 192: 188: 184: 183: 182: 178: 174: 168: 159: 158: 157: 156: 152: 148: 145: 144: 140: 139: 138: 135: 127: 125: 124: 120: 116: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 88: 83: 77: 75: 71: 65: 64: 61: 58: 56: 55: 52: 47: 40: 37: 31: 30: 23: 19: 4621: 4618: 4582: 4526: 4513: 4509: 4487: 4436: 4396: 4351: 4312: 4272: 4232: 4193: 4153: 4114: 4075: 4032: 3992: 3953: 3913: 3873: 3835:User:Diannaa 3823: 3748: 3674: 3631: 3520: 3481: 3442: 3410: 3370: 3331: 3299: 3270: 3219: 3218: 3181: 3176: 3175: 3161: 3154: 3131: 3113: 3080: 2931: 2908: 2873:WP:CITESHORT 2841: 2829: 2773: 2748:|authorlink= 2721: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2692:|accessdate= 2685: 2589: 2543: 2523: 2506:(in Serbian) 2477: 2453: 2449: 2424: 2408: 2401: 2310: 2200: 2196: 2191: 2148: 2140: 2062: 2031: 2008: 1990:WP:SYNTHESIS 1973: 1944:Looks good. 1925: 1884: 1849: 1783: 1690: 1671: 1625: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1574: 1534: 1506: 1467: 1444: 1433: 1406: 1372: 1356: 1329: 1290: 1270: 1243: 1204: 1167: 1109: 1077: 1055: 1015: 978: 917: 878: 826: 809: 772:It's gone.-- 726: 670: 652:WP:SYNTHESIS 646: 611: 600: 561: 538: 528: 505: 481: 465: 443: 405: 387:"Background" 341: 256: 218: 166: 150: 146: 133: 131: 111: 98:Citation bot 67: 45: 44: 35: 32: 2742:Of course, 1903:Quadrillion 1468:exclusively 883:Slovenia.-- 486:citation.-- 261:wikilink.-- 3107:cite video 3024:MOS:IMAGES 2809:cite video 2705:(i.e. say 2201:exposition 2199:, but its 2139:that it's 1722:Yes I do: 1602:ipso facto 1510:as moot.-- 1208:as well.-- 1076:Indeed... 22:Assessment 3858:forces"); 2722:newspaper 2606:review.-- 1724:it's here 1434:euphemism 1357:serb held 1118:WP:DETAIL 50:EyeSerene 4493:Tomobe03 4442:Tomobe03 4402:Tomobe03 4381:armory"; 4357:Tomobe03 4318:Tomobe03 4278:Tomobe03 4199:Tomobe03 4120:Tomobe03 4081:Tomobe03 4038:Tomobe03 3839:Tomobe03 3805:Tomobe03 3772:Tomobe03 3754:Tomobe03 3684:Tomobe03 3637:Tomobe03 3594:Tomobe03 3565:Tomobe03 3526:Tomobe03 3487:Tomobe03 3448:Tomobe03 3395:court"); 3376:Tomobe03 3337:Tomobe03 3284:in..."); 3237:Tomobe03 3220:Comments 3090:Tomobe03 3029:Tomobe03 2977:Tomobe03 2937:Tomobe03 2913:Tomobe03 2877:WP:CITEX 2847:Tomobe03 2792:Tomobe03 2778:Tomobe03 2760:|author= 2744:|author= 2726:Tomobe03 2651:Tomobe03 2608:Tomobe03 2592:Tomobe03 2529:Tomobe03 2465:Tomobe03 2364:Tomobe03 2360:WP:BROKE 2316:Tomobe03 2290:Tomobe03 2109:Tomobe03 2105:WP:BROKE 2075:Tomobe03 2037:Tomobe03 1995:Tomobe03 1932:Tomobe03 1890:Tomobe03 1855:Tomobe03 1794:Tomobe03 1728:Tomobe03 1696:Tomobe03 1631:Tomobe03 1606:Tomobe03 1598:internal 1579:Tomobe03 1546:Tomobe03 1512:Tomobe03 1487:Tomobe03 1453:Tomobe03 1445:conflict 1412:Tomobe03 1335:Tomobe03 1300:Tomobe03 1249:Tomobe03 1210:Tomobe03 1170:Tomobe03 1141:Tomobe03 1096:Tomobe03 1082:Tomobe03 1041:Tomobe03 1027:Tomobe03 984:Tomobe03 933:Tomobe03 885:Tomobe03 832:Tomobe03 774:Tomobe03 696:Tomobe03 656:Tomobe03 568:Tomobe03 543:Tomobe03 488:Tomobe03 411:Tomobe03 347:Tomobe03 323:Tomobe03 314:reported 263:Tomobe03 224:Tomobe03 173:Tomobe03 115:Tomobe03 93:Analysis 70:Tomobe03 20:‎ | 4564:GregorB 4531:GregorB 3720:WP:DASH 3314:WP:DASH 3184:GregorB 3177:Support 3164:GregorB 3136:GregorB 3118:GregorB 3114:content 3043:GregorB 2991:GregorB 2881:GregorB 2816:GregorB 2814:AFAIK. 2752:|first= 2709:is the 2665:GregorB 2637:GregorB 2623:GregorB 2575:GregorB 2546:GregorB 2461:WP:GOCE 2345:GregorB 2288:too".-- 2249:GregorB 2205:GregorB 2197:content 2164:GregorB 2149:because 2088:war".-- 2013:GregorB 1946:GregorB 1930:page.-- 1809:GregorB 1743:GregorB 1710:GregorB 1645:GregorB 1561:GregorB 1473:GregorB 1185:GregorB 1137:WP:SIZE 1122:GregorB 1064:GregorB 947:GregorB 899:GregorB 846:GregorB 760:GregorB 746:GregorB 675:GregorB 582:GregorB 510:GregorB 362:GregorB 277:GregorB 187:GregorB 85:Toolbox 4603:Kebeta 4514:really 4238:Kebeta 4159:Kebeta 3998:Kebeta 3959:Kebeta 3919:Kebeta 3879:Kebeta 3787:WP:ALT 3199:Kebeta 3086:WP:EXT 3009:Kebeta 2962:Kebeta 2845:now.-- 2756:|last= 2699:|work= 2178:Kebeta 1907:Kebeta 1792:yet.-- 1377:Kebeta 1351:"1995" 1265:"1994" 1010:"1993" 1000:"1992" 945:Okay. 897:Okay. 804:"1991" 275:Okay. 2776:...-- 2402:Truth 1594:cause 1114:WP:SS 141:Intro 16:< 4607:talk 4591:talk 4568:talk 4550:talk 4535:talk 4497:talk 4488:Done 4467:talk 4446:talk 4437:Done 4406:talk 4397:Done 4361:talk 4352:Done 4322:talk 4313:Done 4282:talk 4273:Done 4242:talk 4233:Done 4203:talk 4194:Done 4163:talk 4154:Done 4124:talk 4115:Done 4085:talk 4076:Done 4042:talk 4033:Done 4002:talk 3993:Done 3963:talk 3954:Done 3923:talk 3914:Done 3883:talk 3874:Done 3843:talk 3809:talk 3795:talk 3776:talk 3758:talk 3749:Done 3728:talk 3702:talk 3688:talk 3675:Done 3641:talk 3632:Done 3598:talk 3584:talk 3569:talk 3530:talk 3521:Done 3491:talk 3482:Done 3452:talk 3443:Done 3411:Done 3380:talk 3371:Done 3341:talk 3332:Done 3300:Done 3271:Done 3241:talk 3203:talk 3188:talk 3168:talk 3140:talk 3122:talk 3094:talk 3081:Done 3047:talk 3033:talk 3013:talk 2995:talk 2981:talk 2966:talk 2941:talk 2932:Done 2917:talk 2885:talk 2851:talk 2842:Done 2820:talk 2796:talk 2782:talk 2766:see. 2754:and 2730:talk 2711:work 2703:name 2669:talk 2655:talk 2641:talk 2627:talk 2612:talk 2596:talk 2579:talk 2565:talk 2550:talk 2533:talk 2524:Done 2469:talk 2434:talk 2425:Done 2368:talk 2349:talk 2334:talk 2320:talk 2311:Done 2294:talk 2267:talk 2253:talk 2238:talk 2209:talk 2182:talk 2168:talk 2127:talk 2113:talk 2107:).-- 2094:talk 2079:talk 2041:talk 2032:Done 2017:talk 1999:talk 1950:talk 1936:talk 1926:Done 1911:talk 1894:talk 1885:Done 1859:talk 1850:Done 1813:talk 1798:talk 1789:here 1784:Done 1747:talk 1732:talk 1714:talk 1700:talk 1691:Done 1649:talk 1635:talk 1626:Done 1610:talk 1583:talk 1565:talk 1550:talk 1516:talk 1507:Done 1491:talk 1477:talk 1457:talk 1449:this 1416:talk 1407:Done 1381:talk 1373:Done 1339:talk 1330:Done 1304:talk 1291:Done 1253:talk 1244:Done 1214:talk 1205:Done 1189:talk 1174:talk 1145:talk 1126:talk 1100:talk 1086:talk 1068:talk 1045:talk 1031:talk 988:talk 979:Done 951:talk 937:talk 903:talk 889:talk 879:Done 850:talk 836:talk 827:Done 778:talk 764:talk 750:talk 736:talk 727:Done 700:talk 679:talk 660:talk 647:Done 586:talk 572:talk 562:Done 547:talk 514:talk 492:talk 482:Done 453:talk 444:Done 415:talk 406:Done 366:talk 351:talk 342:Done 327:talk 298:this 281:talk 267:talk 257:Done 228:talk 219:Done 191:talk 177:talk 167:Done 119:talk 74:talk 3132:and 2192:had 2009:now 1577:.-- 1298:.-- 1056:was 671:had 134:not 4609:) 4593:) 4570:) 4552:) 4537:) 4527:is 4518:Ed 4499:) 4469:) 4448:) 4408:) 4363:) 4324:) 4284:) 4244:) 4205:) 4165:) 4126:) 4087:) 4044:) 4004:) 3965:) 3925:) 3885:) 3845:) 3811:) 3797:) 3778:) 3760:) 3730:) 3722:. 3704:) 3690:) 3643:) 3600:) 3586:) 3571:) 3532:) 3493:) 3454:) 3382:) 3343:) 3243:) 3205:) 3190:) 3170:) 3142:) 3124:) 3110:}} 3104:{{ 3096:) 3049:) 3035:) 3015:) 2997:) 2983:) 2968:) 2943:) 2919:) 2911:-- 2887:) 2853:) 2822:) 2812:}} 2806:{{ 2798:) 2784:) 2732:) 2671:) 2657:) 2643:) 2629:) 2614:) 2598:) 2581:) 2567:) 2552:) 2535:) 2471:) 2436:) 2370:) 2351:) 2336:) 2322:) 2314:-- 2296:) 2269:) 2255:) 2240:) 2211:) 2184:) 2170:) 2129:) 2115:) 2096:) 2081:) 2043:) 2019:) 2001:) 1952:) 1938:) 1913:) 1896:) 1861:) 1815:) 1800:) 1749:) 1734:) 1716:) 1702:) 1651:) 1637:) 1629:-- 1612:) 1585:) 1567:) 1552:) 1518:) 1493:) 1479:) 1459:) 1418:) 1410:-- 1383:) 1341:) 1306:) 1255:) 1216:) 1191:) 1176:) 1147:) 1128:) 1102:) 1088:) 1080:-- 1070:) 1047:) 1033:) 990:) 953:) 939:) 905:) 891:) 852:) 838:) 780:) 766:) 752:) 738:) 702:) 681:) 662:) 588:) 574:) 549:) 541:-- 516:) 504:: 494:) 455:) 417:) 368:) 353:) 329:) 283:) 269:) 230:) 193:) 179:) 121:) 4605:( 4589:( 4566:( 4548:( 4533:( 4495:( 4465:( 4444:( 4404:( 4359:( 4320:( 4280:( 4240:( 4201:( 4161:( 4122:( 4083:( 4040:( 4000:( 3961:( 3921:( 3881:( 3841:( 3807:( 3793:( 3774:( 3756:( 3726:( 3700:( 3686:( 3639:( 3596:( 3582:( 3567:( 3528:( 3489:( 3450:( 3378:( 3339:( 3239:( 3201:( 3186:( 3166:( 3138:( 3120:( 3092:( 3045:( 3031:( 3011:( 2993:( 2979:( 2964:( 2939:( 2915:( 2883:( 2849:( 2818:( 2794:( 2780:( 2728:( 2667:( 2653:( 2639:( 2625:( 2610:( 2594:( 2577:( 2563:( 2548:( 2531:( 2467:( 2432:( 2366:( 2347:( 2332:( 2318:( 2292:( 2265:( 2251:( 2236:( 2207:( 2180:( 2166:( 2125:( 2111:( 2092:( 2077:( 2039:( 2015:( 1997:( 1948:( 1934:( 1909:( 1892:( 1857:( 1811:( 1796:( 1745:( 1730:( 1712:( 1698:( 1647:( 1633:( 1608:( 1581:( 1563:( 1548:( 1514:( 1489:( 1475:( 1455:( 1414:( 1379:( 1337:( 1302:( 1251:( 1212:( 1187:( 1172:( 1143:( 1124:( 1116:/ 1098:( 1084:( 1066:( 1043:( 1029:( 986:( 949:( 935:( 901:( 887:( 848:( 834:( 776:( 762:( 748:( 734:( 698:( 677:( 658:( 584:( 570:( 545:( 512:( 490:( 451:( 413:( 364:( 349:( 325:( 279:( 265:( 226:( 189:( 175:( 153:. 117:( 76:) 72:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Croatian War of Independence - Knowledge

Index