555:"Over the next months, B-52Gs operating from bases at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; RAF Fairford in the United Kingdom; Moron AB, Spain; and the island of Diego Garcia flew low-altitude bombing missions" seems a bit odd given that the Gulf War only lasted for a few weeks and the next sentence states that the aircraft were shifted to high-altitude bombing after three nights
528:"The Model 464-35 design was a proposal whose powerplant configuration that, unknown to either party, paralleled what the Tupolev design bureau was doing in the Soviet Union three years later in mid-July 1951" - this is confusingly written as the tense is unclear. It might be easier to just say that Tupolev did similar work three years later.
118:
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because I feel that this article could benefit from further evaluation, as it is the intention of some editors of the article to proceed eventually to FAC. Additionally I feel that it has reached a level of quality where this level of consideration is
533:
The 'Production and improvements' section is much too short - is there really nothing to say about the process of building these aircraft over several decades? (eg, where were they built, what as the annual output of aircraft, were there any very notable successes or failures during the production
549:
The coverage of the B-52s Cold War nuclear deterrent mission seems rather brief given that this is was the main use for the aircraft. It would be interesting if this section discussed how the aircraft would have been used in the event of war in greater detail (and how this changed over
351:
I can't get the code to execute properly. I've tried punching it several times, it just won't work as its supposed to despite the fact it is exactly identical to the dozen or so times it did work, such as the book directly above it. I cannot get it to engage properly.
482:
In the
Bibliography section, in this title I think there is a typo: "Boeing's Timeless Deterrent, Part 1: B-52 Stratfortress – From Conception to Hanoi". Should it be "Stratofortress", rather than "Stratfortess"?
539:
What motivated the 'Big Four' program? - it would appear that the answer is concerns about the B-52s ability to penetrate and survive in SAM-protected airspace but this isn't clearly stated
21:
576:
Just wanted to make it clear that I'm standing by for further instructions, I believe I have effectively addressed the concerns and corrections desired so far.
640:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
544:
The 'Fuel research platform' section seems much too long and detailed given that this level of coverage isn't provided to the other experimental uses of B-52s.
341:
can you please the ISBN for "Lake, Jon. "Variant
Briefing: Boeing B-52 Stratofortress: Part 1"? The Advisor tool is showing that it might not be correct;
17:
625:
606:
585:
565:
511:
492:
468:
454:
395:
381:
361:
325:
292:
272:
238:
224:
206:
192:
178:
150:
128:
58:
98:
119:
now a worthwhile use of time and effort, yet the article is likely to benefit from such an intensive lookover by multiple individuals.
459:
That's a fair call and I agree. Apologies for not investigating further as I should have been able to work this one out for myself.
265:
103:
212:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
412:
229:
The current year values have been added for flyaway and other costs in the table. The -53G typo was fixed days ago. -
169:
should be used in the cost table. There are a number of citation needed tags that I added that need to be addressed.
183:
2010 inflated costs in addition to the actual 1955 costs? Replacing the 1955 seems almost like hiding them to me. -
507:
488:
464:
321:
65:
523:
To whom did
William McPherson Allen appeal to keep the B-52 design contract active, and why was this successful?
519:
This is a very solid article, but I think that it may need a bit more work to reach A class. My comments are:
414:. As they would probably just point back to this article, it is probably best to just remove the links IMO;
620:
503:
484:
460:
449:
376:
317:
287:
263:
430:
391:
202:
174:
146:
234:
220:
188:
163:
54:
443:
I think they should be kept. As noted above, I have fixed the rest of the disambiguation links.
137:
the article states in the section on production and upgrades that the work culminated "in the B-
312:
615:
602:
581:
561:
444:
371:
357:
282:
255:
124:
79:
424:
Those links are in the notices at the beginning of the article, which states the following:
334:
306:
there are a couple of citation needed tags in the article, are you able to deal with those?
197:
What you could do is add another row in the table for the flyaway costs in 2010 dollars.
253:
There are a large number of links that redirect, and a few that link to disambig pages.
387:
198:
170:
142:
230:
216:
184:
50:
311:
in the last sentence of the lead, there are some citations inside the bracket. Per
598:
577:
557:
353:
120:
75:
302:: Sorry, just a couple of quick ones as I am very short of time at the moment.
370:
a fix there. I hope I didn't make it so it's the wrong ISBN now. :)
437:
108:
367:
278:
337:(this is only a suggestion and is not a requirement);
141:G and B-52H". That should be B-52G, correct?
8:
366:Apparently, there was an extra number, so I
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
436:"BUFF" redirects here. For other uses, see
429:"B-52" redirects here. For other uses, see
333:alt text could be added to the article per
87:
502:: all my concerns have been addressed.
90:
213:McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II#Costs
211:Will probably do it like the table in
7:
330:ext links work (no action required);
33:The following discussion is closed.
386:Yes you got the right ISBN. Thanks.
315:they should go outside the bracket.
28:
634:The discussion above is closed.
614:—a solid, well-written article.
433:. <- that is one of the links
440:. <- and this is the other
1:
626:22:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
607:06:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
411:there are two disambig links
59:08:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
586:18:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
566:08:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
512:06:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
493:10:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
469:02:50, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
455:17:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
396:22:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
382:17:14, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
362:17:07, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
326:22:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
293:20:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
273:17:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
239:04:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
225:17:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
207:18:09, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
193:17:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
179:16:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
151:16:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
129:16:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
657:
66:Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
637:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
597:comments now addressed
431:B52 (disambiguation)
270:
116:
115:
84:
648:
639:
623:
618:
504:AustralianRupert
485:AustralianRupert
461:AustralianRupert
452:
447:
379:
374:
318:AustralianRupert
290:
285:
271:
262:
258:
168:
162:
88:
72:
38:
656:
655:
651:
650:
649:
647:
646:
645:
644:
635:
621:
616:
450:
445:
377:
372:
288:
283:
277:Disambig links
268:
261:
256:
166:
160:
69:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
654:
652:
643:
642:
630:
629:
628:
609:
591:
590:
589:
588:
571:
570:
569:
568:
552:
546:
541:
536:
530:
525:
514:
497:
496:
495:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
434:
427:
426:
425:
419:
418:
417:
416:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
346:
345:
344:
343:
338:
331:
328:
308:
297:
296:
295:
266:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
227:
154:
153:
114:
113:
112:
111:
109:External links
106:
101:
93:
92:
86:
85:
74:Nominator(s):
68:
63:
62:
61:
43:
42:
41:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
653:
641:
638:
632:
631:
627:
624:
619:
613:
610:
608:
604:
600:
596:
593:
592:
587:
583:
579:
575:
574:
573:
572:
567:
563:
559:
556:
553:
551:
547:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
534:run(s), etc).
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
520:
518:
515:
513:
509:
505:
501:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
480:
479:
478:
477:
470:
466:
462:
458:
457:
456:
453:
448:
442:
441:
439:
435:
432:
428:
423:
422:
421:
420:
415:
413:
409:
408:
407:
406:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:
383:
380:
375:
369:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
350:
349:
348:
347:
342:
339:
336:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
316:
314:
309:
307:
304:
303:
301:
298:
294:
291:
286:
280:
276:
275:
274:
269:
264:
260:
259:
252:
251:
240:
236:
232:
228:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:
180:
176:
172:
165:
158:
157:
156:
155:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
133:
132:
131:
130:
126:
122:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
96:
95:
94:
89:
83:
81:
77:
71:
70:
67:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
45:
44:
40:
37:
31:
30:
23:
19:
636:
633:
611:
594:
554:
548:
543:
538:
532:
527:
522:
516:
499:
481:
410:
340:
310:
305:
299:
254:
138:
134:
117:
104:Citation bot
73:
46:
35:
32:
617:Airplaneman
446:Airplaneman
373:Airplaneman
284:Airplaneman
257:bahamut0013
22:Assessment
388:Nigel Ish
368:attempted
279:addressed
199:Parsecboy
171:Parsecboy
164:inflation
143:Parsecboy
135:Question:
517:Comments
300:Comments
231:fnlayson
217:fnlayson
185:fnlayson
99:Analysis
51:Ian Rose
47:Promoted
20: |
612:Support
595:Support
500:Support
313:WP:PAIC
215:then. -
91:Toolbox
599:Nick-D
578:Kyteto
558:Nick-D
550:time).
354:Kyteto
335:WP:ALT
159:Also,
121:Kyteto
76:Kyteto
267:deeds
16:<
603:talk
582:talk
562:talk
508:talk
489:talk
465:talk
438:Buff
392:talk
358:talk
322:talk
235:talk
221:talk
203:talk
189:talk
175:talk
147:talk
125:talk
80:talk
55:talk
49:--
605:)
584:)
564:)
510:)
491:)
467:)
394:)
360:)
324:)
281:.
237:)
223:)
205:)
191:)
177:)
167:}}
161:{{
149:)
139:53
127:)
57:)
622:✈
601:(
580:(
560:(
506:(
487:(
463:(
451:✈
390:(
378:✈
356:(
320:(
289:✈
233:(
219:(
201:(
187:(
173:(
145:(
123:(
82:)
78:(
53:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.