86:
Despite surviving World War II, Nagato had a surprisingly uneventful career. She only participated in a couple of battles during the war, most notably the Battle of Leyte Gulf, and was laid up after that to save fuel. Surrendered at the end of the war, the
Americans used her as a target during
87:
Operation
Crossroads, the tests at Bikini Atoll in 1946. She is now a popular scuba-diving destination there. I believe that I've incorporated all of the ACR and FAC comments from her sister ship Mutsu's ACR and FAC, so she should be in pretty good shape.--
215:
The IJN preferred to round units to the nearest whole number when they first adopted the metric system around 1920. Later they were more precise after the various naval treaties limited cruiser guns to 155 and 203 mm.
120:
I'd suggest noting the decision to flood the ship's ballast tanks to convince the
Americans that she had been sunk in the July 1945 raid, as well as her preparations to put to sea on 2 August (see Tully 2003)
108:
I'm biased on the topic of the article on the 1945 raid targeting the ship given that I wrote most of it, but IMO it warrants a mention in the lead as it was one of the most dramatic incidents in the ship's
244:
And the uploader hasn't been active since 2008 so its unlikely you'll be able to get in touch with them. I doubt it'll pass an image review at FAC without a source, so it might be wise to replace it.
21:
169:
as an IJN-designed equipment, but built commercially. The history of the
Mitsubishi-Nagasaki shipyard that I have says that the company built more than a few Gihon turbines.
196:
It might be worthwhile to point out when the
Japanese surrendered - readers might be confused about why US ships were securing the ship without a fight.
17:
291:
387:
363:
349:
328:
306:
273:
259:
144:
130:
96:
57:
379:
250:
since it illustrates the bent funnel, but I have no idea what its US copyright status is. Especially if colorizing it adds "artistic" value.--
173:
313:
401:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
162:
Is there a link to Gihon? Presumably it's a notable company and should be redlinked if there isn't already an article.
63:
359:
324:
302:
269:
255:
140:
92:
77:
235:
375:
345:
355:
320:
298:
265:
251:
241:
Our copy seems to be the only one on the web after searching through Google image, so who knows?
136:
88:
73:
53:
112:
Was Nagato one of the ships which chased after the
American fleet following the Doolittle Raid?
183:
It seems as though most of the ship's captains are redlinked, but a few aren't - why is that?
126:
248:
383:
341:
49:
122:
104:
This article is in excellent condition, and I have only the following comments:
212:"8 cm, their actual caliber was 76.2 mm" - why different units of measure?
172:
I wonder if we could get someone to put together a turbine counterpart of
165:
I can't find anything on the web about it. It may be the equivalent of
166:
186:
The redlinked ones made flag rank, the others didn't.
264:
Replaced a couple of the photos with superior ones.--
219:
I was curious why "7.62 cm" wouldn't make more sense.
204:When exactly did she sink? The night she capsized?
8:
294:- can you add a translation for the source?
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
292:File:Japanese Battleship Nagato 1944.jpg
247:I'd really prefer to use something like
174:List of boiler types, by manufacturer
7:
33:The following discussion is closed.
314:File:IJN ships leave Brunei Bay.jpg
28:
395:The discussion above is closed.
135:All done. See how it all reads.--
1:
388:15:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
58:19:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
364:20:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
350:18:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
340:Great work as usual, Sturm.
329:20:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
307:20:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
274:03:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
260:21:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
145:19:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
131:10:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
335:Everything else looks good.
97:00:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
418:
64:Japanese battleship Nagato
354:Thanks for your review.--
398:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
382:are my edits. - Dank (
158:- mostly minor stuff:
316:- needs a PD-US tag
236:File:Nagato_1939.jpg
376:standard disclaimer
226:No duplicate links
278:Looks good to me.
238:- needs a source
82:
409:
400:
70:
38:
417:
416:
412:
411:
410:
408:
407:
406:
405:
396:
67:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
415:
413:
404:
403:
391:
369:
368:
367:
366:
338:
337:
336:
333:
332:
331:
311:
310:
309:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
210:
209:
208:
202:
201:
200:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
150:
149:
148:
147:
118:
117:
116:
110:
84:
83:
72:Nominator(s):
66:
61:
43:
42:
41:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
414:
402:
399:
393:
392:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:on prose per
373:
365:
361:
357:
356:Sturmvogel 66
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:Sturmvogel 66
318:
317:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:Sturmvogel 66
296:
295:
293:
290:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
266:Sturmvogel 66
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
252:Sturmvogel 66
249:
246:
245:
243:
242:
240:
239:
237:
234:
233:
231:
228:
225:
218:
217:
214:
213:
211:
206:
205:
203:
198:
197:
195:
188:
187:
185:
184:
182:
175:
171:
170:
168:
164:
163:
161:
160:
159:
157:
156:
146:
142:
138:
137:Sturmvogel 66
134:
133:
132:
128:
124:
119:
114:
113:
111:
107:
106:
105:
103:
99:
98:
94:
90:
89:Sturmvogel 66
81:
79:
75:
74:Sturmvogel 66
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
48:
40:
37:
31:
30:
23:
19:
397:
394:
384:push to talk
371:
370:
230:Image review
229:
189:Makes sense.
154:
152:
151:
101:
100:
85:
71:
46:
44:
35:
32:
207:Clarified.
199:Good idea.
22:Assessment
342:Parsecboy
155:Comments
153:Support
50:Hawkeye7
47:promoted
45:Article
20: |
372:Support
319:Doen.--
297:Done.--
109:history
102:Support
167:Kampon
123:Nick-D
380:These
16:<
360:talk
346:talk
325:talk
303:talk
270:talk
256:talk
141:talk
127:talk
93:talk
78:talk
54:talk
115:No.
386:)
378:.
362:)
348:)
327:)
305:)
272:)
258:)
232::
143:)
129:)
95:)
56:)
358:(
344:(
323:(
301:(
268:(
254:(
176:.
139:(
125:(
91:(
80:)
76:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.