204:", perhaps tomorrow (which I guess is today, according to zulu time). For your second point: yes, I guess that's true, I'll take a look at that as well. Unfortunately, with the exception of the mine damage to the ship during the second Yarmouth operation (mainly because it delayed the sortie that resulted in Jutland), there is little available, at least in English language sources, that states what the ship was doing. Presumably, she was sitting around in Wilhelmshaven or Kiel, with the crew twiddling their thumbs, but I don't know if there's much value added in mentioning that after every operation. As for the photo, and I'm by no means an expert on copyright (especially the more complex stuff like photos of models), I think that if the uploader were to state that s/he was the creator of the model, then there wouldn't be an issue, even if models do fall under the reproduction of artwork restriction. But I'll leave that to the image people at FAC to decide for sure :) Thanks again.
170:
Is there anything particularly remarkable about "Financial constraints meant that there would have to be a trade off between speed, battle capabilities, and displacement." - this is true for almost every warship ever produced, and so this sentence could be toned
141:
I recently rewrote and greatly expanded the article, and it just passed GA. I think it's at or close to A, with maybe some minor copyediting to be done. I appreciate all comments towards ironing out the article, towards an eventual run at FAC. Thanks in advance!
347:
It took me a little while to get to this, but I've re-uploaded all of the images you noted back to en.wiki, with the appropriate license templates. As for the one of the ship after
Jutland, if it will need to go, I can always upload one of
174:
The 'World War I' section is good, but only covers the operations the ship was involved in. A para or two on what she did between these operations (eg, sit at anchor with occasional exercises and overhauls) would be
251:, as there is no indication that M.L. Carstens was an employee of the federal government and took the photo as part of his official duties (though I also wonder how the ONI got their hands on it...)
105:
21:
369:
Eh, the images are good enough; I just wanted to hit the ones I knew what to do with. The others can be left to the good (and mush more knowledgeable) image reviewers at FAC.
465:"A month later, the German Revolution began; it toppled the monarchy and led to the Armistice that ended the war." That was not a month after October 24, did you mean week?
301:
563:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
230:
17:
240:
needs to be moved here and deleted on
Commons; NHC photos are only certainly in the public domain in the U.S. use the same templates as I did on
182:
is PD given that its a photo of a model (eg, is it a reproduction of an artwork or equivalent?). I personally don't care, but someone else will.
167:, and the name of the ship is often repeated in adjacent sentences. This could be mixed up a bit by using words like 'she', 'her' and 'the ship'
261:
255:
314:
ought to be wikilinked in the opening sentence, no? Also, those hyphens look...odd. Are they wrong, or am I just imagining things?
268:
a work of the federal government; according to the LOC, it is an "Illus. The
Illustrated London News, 1916 June 10, p. 739." So
544:
521:
505:
483:
435:
417:
403:
385:
364:
336:
320:
Can we get locations and OCLC's for all of your books by entering their ISBN's in place of the #'s here? worldcat.org/##########
213:
191:
151:
77:
288:
282:
43:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
294:
179:
121:
126:
554:
34:
248:
241:
349:
244:. This is assuming, of course, that you don't find info indicating that it was published prior to WWI. :-)
237:
492:
Thanks. I think I meant "next month", not "a month later", thanks for catching that :) I clarified that
73:
501:
413:
360:
209:
147:
95:
305:
160:
This is a very good article which meets the criteria. My comments for further development are:
272:
187:
540:
516:
478:
69:
497:
409:
356:
205:
143:
91:
425:
393:
375:
326:
462:
Please explain the bit about her being manned by the crew of York, that confuses me.
50:
183:
536:
511:
473:
311:
535:. I couldn't find any issues with this well-written article. Great work.
472:
An interesting read that actually taught me something, good luck at FAC. –
233:
needs attention, and there are no external links, so no problem there!
496:
had just been withdrawn from active service, is that better now?
178:
If you take the article to a FAC someone is bound to ask whether
355:
Pardon my ignorance, but what is an OCLC? Thanks again, Ed.
297:
has no proof that it is PD, but that can be left for FAC.
131:
224:
308:something like "Official U.S. Navy Photograph". :)
304:is, it is not a work of the U.S. Navy or it would
106:Featured article candidates/SMS Seydlitz/archive1
302:File:German battlecruisers steaming to Scapa.jpg
200:Thanks, I'll get on fixing the repetition of "
8:
33:The following discussion is preserved as an
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
110:
553:The above discussion is preserved as an
113:
103:
163:There's a bit too much repetition of
7:
262:File:SMS Seydlitz mit Zeppelin.jpg
256:File:Seydlitz moored in harbor.jpg
28:
180:File:SMS Seydlitz 1916 1-350 .jpg
408:Thanks for taking care of that!
289:File:Seydlitz badly damaged.jpg
283:File:HMS Queen Mary Jutland.jpg
1:
317:Sources/references look good.
295:File:SMS Seydlitz damage.jpg
580:
545:07:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
522:21:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
506:00:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
484:20:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
78:08:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
436:16:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
418:14:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
404:14:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
386:14:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
365:13:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
337:22:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
249:File:Seydlitz in port.jpg
242:File:Scharnhorst guns.jpg
214:02:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
192:23:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
152:13:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
560:Please do not modify it.
40:Please do not modify it.
278:would work better. :P
285:; can't read German!
510:Yes, excellent. –
455:. Just two issues:
247:Same problem with
139:
138:
100:
571:
562:
519:
514:
481:
476:
433:
431:
428:
401:
399:
396:
383:
381:
378:
334:
332:
329:
323:Cheers Parsec, —
277:
271:
111:
88:
42:
579:
578:
574:
573:
572:
570:
569:
568:
567:
558:
517:
512:
479:
474:
429:
426:
424:
397:
394:
392:
379:
376:
374:
372:I'll do it :P —
352:and replace it.
330:
327:
325:
275:
269:
54:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
577:
575:
566:
565:
549:
548:
547:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
487:
486:
469:
468:
467:
466:
463:
457:
456:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
370:
353:
342:
341:
340:
339:
321:
318:
315:
309:
298:
292:
286:
279:
259:
252:
245:
234:
217:
216:
197:
196:
195:
194:
176:
172:
168:
137:
136:
135:
134:
132:External links
129:
124:
116:
115:
109:
108:
102:
101:
90:Nominator(s):
86:
85:
84:
83:
82:
81:
80:
53:
48:
47:
46:
45:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
576:
564:
561:
556:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
531:
530:
523:
520:
515:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
490:
489:
488:
485:
482:
477:
471:
470:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
454:
451:
450:
437:
434:
432:
422:No problem! —
421:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
406:
405:
402:
400:
389:
388:
387:
384:
382:
371:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
346:
345:
344:
343:
338:
335:
333:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
303:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
280:
274:
267:
263:
260:
257:
253:
250:
246:
243:
239:
238:opening image
235:
232:
229:
228:
226:
222:
219:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
162:
161:
159:
156:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
119:
118:
117:
112:
107:
104:
99:
97:
93:
87:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
62:
61:
60:
59:
58:
57:
56:
55:
52:
49:
44:
41:
36:
31:
30:
23:
19:
559:
552:
532:
493:
452:
423:
391:
373:
350:these images
324:
281:Not sure on
265:
231:One disambig
225:this version
220:
201:
164:
157:
140:
127:Citation bot
89:
64:
63:
51:SMS Seydlitz
39:
32:
291:looks good.
254:Ditto with
312:Metric ton
70:Eurocopter
22:Assessment
498:Parsecboy
410:Parsecboy
357:Parsecboy
300:Whatever
206:Parsecboy
144:Parsecboy
92:Parsecboy
221:Comments
202:Seydlitz
165:Seydlitz
122:Analysis
65:Promoted
20: |
555:archive
533:Support
453:Support
390:Done. —
273:PD-1923
158:Support
114:Toolbox
35:archive
184:Nick-D
537:Cla68
494:Yorck
175:good.
16:<
541:talk
502:talk
414:talk
361:talk
236:The
210:talk
188:talk
171:down
148:talk
96:talk
74:talk
557:.
513:Joe
475:Joe
427:Ed
395:Ed
377:Ed
328:Ed
306:say
266:not
264:is
223:- (
543:)
504:)
430:17
416:)
398:17
380:17
363:)
331:17
276:}}
270:{{
227:)
212:)
190:)
150:)
76:)
68:--
37:.
539:(
518:N
500:(
480:N
412:(
359:(
258:.
208:(
186:(
146:(
98:)
94:(
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.