117:
the articles we have are held to higher standards, and like all of
Bellhalla's articles this one is exceptional for its well cited information, however it currently fails A5, the criteria on supporting visual aids. I would be thrilled to support the article, but the standards demand a picture or two
133:
After thinking the matter through, I changed my mind. If there are no free images, then we could in theory add non-free images, but that wouldn't nessicarly be helpful since our low pixle policy on fair use pics would deprive the auduence of the pleasure of viewing the ship, and an external link to
196:
As ever, support. Meets all the A-Class criteria, the infobox would actually be enough I think, it doesn't have to have an image to become FA, though I like the fair-use one (and it is licenced correctly). I added in the == Collision == sub-header as the large block of text was a bit unmanageable.
114:
21:
241:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
17:
232:
34:
156:, a fair use image of the ship, to the infobox. (I've never added a fair-use image to WP before, so I hope I have done everything properly.) —
220:
206:
188:
165:
147:
128:
103:
74:
43:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
134:
an image would not add signifigantly to the article. I think this qualifies as a unique circumstance and thus switch to
70:
153:
82:
I'm nominating this for A-Class because I believe it meets the requirements. Note: there appear to be no
66:
118:(or a very good explination f why there are no pictures) before I can in good faith change my !vote.
216:
161:
143:
124:
99:
184:
50:
202:
212:
157:
139:
120:
95:
180:
198:
211:
Thanks for the header and the check up on the fair use image. —
8:
33:The following discussion is preserved as an
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
231:The above discussion is preserved as an
7:
115:the new five point A-class standards
28:
1:
221:19:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
207:17:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
75:19:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
189:18:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
166:12:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
148:03:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
129:02:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
104:14:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
258:
154:Image:SS Washingtonian.jpg
179:You're on a roll here. --
238:Please do not modify it.
40:Please do not modify it.
113:With the adoption of
94:, for that matter) —
63:Result: promoted.
249:
240:
111:Regretful oppose
92:Elizabeth Palmer
42:
257:
256:
252:
251:
250:
248:
247:
246:
245:
236:
57:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
255:
253:
244:
243:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
191:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
80:
79:
78:
77:
56:
48:
47:
46:
45:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
254:
242:
239:
234:
229:
228:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
195:
192:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
174:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
149:
145:
141:
137:
132:
131:
130:
126:
122:
119:
116:
112:
108:
107:
106:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:Washingtonian
85:
76:
72:
68:
64:
61:
60:
59:
58:
55:
54:
53:Washingtonian
49:
44:
41:
36:
31:
30:
23:
19:
237:
230:
193:
176:
135:
110:
109:
91:
87:
83:
81:
62:
52:
39:
32:
197:Good work.
86:images of
67:Eurocopter
22:Assessment
213:Bellhalla
158:Bellhalla
140:TomStar81
121:TomStar81
96:Bellhalla
152:I added
20: |
233:archive
194:Support
177:Support
136:Support
35:archive
199:Woody
16:<
217:talk
203:talk
185:talk
181:Brad
162:talk
144:Talk
125:Talk
100:talk
90:(or
84:free
71:talk
235:.
51:SS
219:)
205:)
187:)
164:)
146:)
138:.
127:)
102:)
73:)
65:--
37:.
215:(
201:(
183:(
160:(
142:(
123:(
98:(
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.