Knowledge

:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Royal Gloucestershire Hussars - Knowledge

Source 📝

1051:
yeomanry's socio-political context, the sum total of the RGH's minimal activity in this respect is pretty much all detailed in the article. All that I have left out is the fact that the Dodington Troop was sent away very soon after arriving in Bristol, and the Tetbury Troop appear to have stayed there a night and prevented any further pillaging in the area they were stationed, with no indication of what happened thereafter. Is "watch this space for my next project" an acceptable answer?
1742: 1631: 1597: 1582: 1563: 1436: 1415: 1398: 1377: 1359: 1342: 1325: 1308: 1291: 1036: 997: 976: 954: 931: 910: 870: 845: 823: 801: 776: 753: 731: 174:
standards. Two issues that I'm aware of concern the sources. I have looked and looked, but cannot find any ISBN for Frank Fox's history which was published in 1923 and recently reprinted in facsimile edition, nor can I find an ISBN for Murphy's official NZ history for the relief of Tobruk. Hope these are not issues for either ACR or FAC.
1104:"The Royal Gloucestershire Hussars was not obliged to serve overseas, but could volunteer to do so" - do we know how this worked in practice? (for example, did individual members of the regiment volunteer for or opt out of overseas service, and at what point was the regiment deemed to have volunteered for this duty?) 1454:
period to 1898, but it talks of replacing breeches with pantaloons with trousers, and I have no idea what the difference is or whether anyone would find that interesting, gives colours that are at odds with the images of the time, and generally I think this subject is better conveyed by the use of images. Is that OK?
1453:
I've added some quirky info about the regiment being ordered to grow moustaches, and the unusual way they wore the Hussar uniform, but don't think it's useful to try and describe the various changes in uniform, which were otherwise fairly standard. The info is actually provided in the source for the
1142:
I've indicated for each battle whether the regiment fought as mounted infantry or cavalry where that information is given in the sources. I can only speculate that the Battle of Qatia was fought dismounted, so have not specified, and I weasled out of it for the action of 12 November by calling it a
399:
It states on the image that it was published by Lloyd Brothers & Co of 96 Gracechurch Street, London, and I have added information to the image description I found on the British Museum website which says that they occupied these premises between 1857 and 1867, so although I don't have an exact
381:
The short answer is, I don't know, that information is not available anywhere. The artist died in 1876, which is why I applied a {{PD-Art|PD-old-70}} tag. The image was taken from the Brown University digital collection on the basis that a scan of an out of copyright image garners no new copyright.
1046:
While not a big deal in this particular article, the material on how the unit was largely used as riot police in its early years would benefit from noting critiques of this practice: the Yeomanry appear to have been used by the upper class to suppress various reform movements and to defend the old
1612:
I'm not sure that "renamed" adequately conveys the process. It implies that only the name changed, but in actual fact the unit ceased to use horses and was equipped instead with armoured cars. "Convert" conveys this sense of change in a way that "rename" does not. An alternative would be to write
382:
Have I mis-understood any of this so far? If not, then can I apply a {{PD-US-unpublished}} tag on the basis that there is no publication information, or can I apply a {{PD-1923}} on the assumption that it was published, as looks likely, sometime before 1923, even if we don't know exactly when?
173:
Another one from the shire. I did submit it for PR, but no-one was biting, and looking over some of the other PR requests, that avenue for review seems to be quite dead these days. I'm hoping that this article is good enough not to waste anyone's time in ACR, with a view to improving it to FAC
1050:
As interesting as it is (I've already started researching it for my next WP project) I'm not sure I can work the wider political (and social) context of the yeomanry into this article in any meaningful, relevant way without going off topic. While there is certainly something to say about the
610:. The IWM asserts a non-commercial use restriction, which I know is not acceptable for our purposes, but did I read somewhere that images formerly subject to Crown copyright are PD when older than 70 years, which this one obviously is, regardless of what the IWM asserts? 665:. I've replaced the lead image again. I've added info to the commons page that dates the cap badge to no later than 1908, and on that basis applied a PD-UKGov license to the subject. Basically, the initials "IY" either side of the portcullis in the badge stand for 1603:
for the lead. I would like to leave it as is when the subject is covered in the main narrative as I think it makes the prose a bit more elegant, though it could probably be better written as "swapped" rather than "traded" if that makes it any less odd for
1667:
It was a straight lift from the source. I don't like naming the source a la "according to Wyndham-Quin" unless I'm specifically discussing different viewpoints according to sources - I think it breaks up the narrative flow - so I've just deleted the
1464:
Or not. I was hoping to take a picture of the regimental insignia on the war memorial, but for a couple of reasons that won't work. I will keep looking, but for this ACR I don't think I will be able to find an appropriately licensed image.
1609:"Following the war, the regiment was downsized and converted to the 21st (Royal Gloucestershire Hussars) Armoured Car Company" - "renamed" rather than "converted"? (it would make the first sentence of the next paragraph easier to follow) 137: 1180:
What period was the 3rd Royal Gloucestershire Hussars active for? Do we know how many men were assigned to this unit given that it does seem to have existed in order to build dummy tanks (presumably only a handful)
444:
File:Sergeants,_Gloucestershire_Hussars,_1896.jpg: given tag and attribution are incorrect - under US law a simple 2D reproduction of an existing image garners no new copyright, and details for the original are
1207:, but I don't have any sources for this. I've ordered Beckett's book on the Territorials, which will be arriving in the next week or so, but if that doesn't say, then I'm not sure where I can find this info. 1754:"The regiment was based at Brunswick Road in Gloucester at this time (the drill hall was demolished in 1934)." - felt a bit clunky, since the text doesn't mention the drill hall until the bit in brackets. 70: 1812:
Thanks for your help. Hope I've addressed your commemnts, if not fully, at least satisfactorily. If there's anything there still that jeopardises the ACR, please let me know and I'll see what I can do.
1184:
There's no information about how long they were active, but I've expanded the detail on what this unit did during the war, and how many men there were, sourced from the regimental association website.
293:
And to clarify, those two links relate to the Vinkhuijzen collection as a whole. It's unlikely that any publication date for the individual imprint can ever be identified; the information on the
1806:
Deliberately ambiguous. The source does not say what troops they are, but they're probably Australian given that the source is. Not sure it's appropriate to say "not the Hussars" in the caption.
294: 1592:"the regiment raised a second-line unit which remained in the UK and traded horses for bicycles in 1916" - this read a bit oddly to me; "and became a bicycle unit" or something like that? 194:
File:Royal_Gloucestershire_Hussars_badge_and_service_cap.jpg: the tag currently in use requires that you describe steps taken to try to determine authorship, and also include a US PD tag
1335:
might be worth mentioning in the lead what primary armoured vehicles it operated in WWII and subsequently. Medium and light tanks in WWII, light vehicles, infantry and now tanks again?
1761:
That was a drive-by edit. I don't like it myself, and the source almost certainly won't bear scrutiny in FAC. I'll discuss with the editor and see if it really needs to be there.
1139:
It might be worth noting how the regiment operated in Egypt and the Palestine Campaign: were its men mounted infantry in practice, or did they usually fight as mounted cavalry?
120: 1083:
There's no information specifically about the RGH, but I added a paragraph about the changing social composition of the yeomanry in general around the time of the Boer War.
1574: 1365:
They were linked previously in earlier versions of the article, but I moved those to a refnote and forgot to re-link. Stroudwater is a backwater and has no article in WP.
116: 21: 297:
about the collection states "Source notes for many of the images are lacking...", and there is no source information on any of the NYPL pages for this specific image.
566:
Changed the license to {{PD-AustraliaGov}} and added some author info which states, with a source, that in 1918 the author was an official government photographer.
108: 1613:"was converted to an armoured car company and renamed the 21st (Royal Gloucestershire Hussars) Armoured Car Company", but that's unnecessarily clunky I think. 1233:
Those changes all look good, though please note my request for an extra reference above. Sorry for the slow reply as well - I was out of town for a few days.
1164:"Suffering more from sickness in the inhospitable environment " - I'd suggest explaining why the environment was so bad (eg, heat, humidity and malaria) 1107:
Added a note to the ref (#43) explaining how the 'imperial obligation' worked in practice to allow territorial units to volunteer for service overseas.
1822: 1797: 1777: 1695: 1662: 1536: 1522: 1508: 1493: 1474: 1278: 1257: 1242: 1226: 1198: 1155: 1119: 1095: 1063: 1017: 716: 696: 682: 652: 633: 619: 597: 575: 561: 521: 507: 493: 479: 461: 423: 409: 394: 376: 360: 320: 306: 288: 276: 266: 252: 238: 224: 210: 183: 66: 1641:"'fencible' cavalry consisting of 'gentlemen and yeomanry'" - should these be double speech marks as quotes? (as per the other quotes in the article) 1175:
Added deployment date. I can tell you that they returned in 1947, but that's only because I read about it in the museum, and have no source for it.
1701:"all of the Gloucestershire yeomanry captains met in Petty France" - I'd advise "the village of Petty France", as there is a much more well known 1648:
to present unfamiliar terms, but I've removed them anyway and linked "gentlemen" so that anyone who is unfamiliar can find out more for all three.
153: 943:
is there an OCLC number for the Fox work (I note you mention no ISBNs, but usually these works will have OCLCs instead)? They can be found here:
606:
Updated commons with true author information. It's an image taken by an officer of No 1 Army Film & Photographic Unit, and sourced from the
1457:
The only cap badge image in commons had questionable licensing. I may, however, be able source an alternative either today or over the weekend.
1352:"in Fairford and Cirencester, Stroudwater, Tetbury, Gloucester, Winterbourne and Stapleton, and Alveston" some of these are linked, others not? 17: 470:, published on 9 April 1896. Is it possible to simply apply a different copyright tag on the basis that it is obviously older than 70 years? 1788:" Mounted troops riding out of the Jordan Valley" - unclear from the caption if these troops are the Hussars or another unspecified unit? 1618:"When it lost two commanders killed in action in quick succession" - "When it had two commanders killed in action..."? (would be cleaner) 484:
Not sure which tag you're referring to - there is a tag for life of the author plus 70 years, or there's one for pre-1923 publication.
158: 112: 1726:
Me too! Couple of the sources are 100 years or more old, and it was fascinating to see real class attitude seeping out of the pages.
1527:
Yeah, I can understand that. Just have to figure out how to get one that won't fall foul of licensing issues. Thanks for your help.
1626:"British Prime Minister William Pitt made the first ever mention of yeoman cavalry" - presumably "first ever recorded mention"? 552:
The US PD tag currently in use claims a pre-1923 publication - you'd need to swap in a different tag if publication is unknown.
1204: 1733:"inspector general of the Imperial Yeomanry" - just to check, should that be "Inspector General" if it is a formal job title? 1072:
Were the personnel provided for the Imperial Yeomanry in 1901 volunteers for active service, or were they required to serve?
1834:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
103: 79: 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
889:
The only info I can find in my books or online are his initials. I've added them on first mention. I've also applied
1031:
The specific unit names in the first para of the lead and the early sections of the article shouldn't be in italics
722:
some elements of the infobox do not appear in the body of the article, e.g. the motto, the colours and anniversaries
712: 1370:
if the yeomanry served as mounted infantry in South Africa, perhaps mention that when South Africa first comes up?
538:
File:Cavalry_watering_at_Mary's_Well_in_Nazareth_1918_(AWM_image_B00273).jpg: when/where was this first published?
1645: 1129: 1301:
did the regt operate as mounted infantry at any stage during WWI? If so, perhaps mention both roles in the lead?
588:
File:Crusadertankandgermantank.jpg: if this is a work of the Australian armed forces, why would it be UKGov?
54: 215:
Got lazy and simply replaced the image with a different, PD image sourced from the New York Public LIbrary
1691: 1518: 1489: 1274: 1189:
The Post war section would benefit from noting the units the regiment was assigned to during this period.
790: 708: 1702: 692: 629: 593: 557: 517: 489: 419: 390: 372: 316: 262: 234: 62: 1768:
I've swapped messages with the other editor, and he's OK with removing that sentence, so it's gone.
767:"It fought in the second action of the Es Salt" or " It fought in the Second Action of the Es Salt" 1653:"Powell Snell, a "gentleman of means and good position"" - unclear who this quote is coming from. 1818: 1793: 1773: 1679: 1658: 1532: 1504: 1470: 1253: 1222: 1013: 678: 648: 615: 571: 503: 475: 457: 405: 356: 302: 284: 248: 220: 206: 179: 93: 50: 1687: 1514: 1485: 1270: 890: 859: 670: 666: 1248:
No problem. That info has been moved into a footnote and a ref added. Thanks for your help.
1238: 1194: 1151: 1115: 1091: 1059: 737:
removed all info from lead that is not sourced directly with cites or in the main narrative.
688: 660: 625: 607: 589: 553: 513: 485: 415: 386: 368: 312: 258: 230: 58: 1446:
any information/images available about the cap badge or formal/ceremonial uniform quirks?
1719:"all members should grow moustaches "in the form of a carving knife"," - loved this bit! 1172:
When did the 1st Royal Gloucestershire Hussars deploy to Austria and return to the UK?
1814: 1789: 1769: 1683: 1675: 1654: 1528: 1500: 1466: 1249: 1218: 1009: 707:: G'day, nice work with this article. I have the following suggestions/observations: 674: 644: 611: 567: 499: 471: 453: 401: 352: 298: 280: 244: 216: 202: 175: 89: 1555:"the regiment adopted a hussar uniform " - would be a good chance to directly link 1234: 1190: 1147: 1111: 1087: 1080:
Did the make-up of the regiment become more cosmopolitan over the 19th century?
1055: 643:
I believe that's all image issues resolved. Thanks for your patience and help.
1573:"and a French invasion that never materialised" - could this be linked? (e.g. 546: 272: 673:. When you get a chance, would you mind letting me know if that's all OK? 341:
File:An_officer_of_the_Royal_Gloucestershire_Hussars.jpg needs a US PD tag
549:
explicitly states that the image is "Copyright expired - public domain"?
882:"Major Trevor, who had...": do we know this officer's first name at all? 1027:
This article is in good shape, and I have only the following comments:
766:
irregular caps: "It fought in the Second action of the Es Salt" --: -->
243:
Does donation to the New York Public Library count as being published?
1556: 893:
for Maj Trevor, although it looks odd, that being a common firstname.
1213:
Thanks for your help. I've not been able to address all your issues
257:
No, although they might have details about its publication history.
1513:
Looks good. I think it might need a cap badge for FAC. Supporting.
1110:
That looks very good, but can you please add a reference for this?
988:"The Naval & Military Press Ltd": the "Ltd" isn't required here 1318:
suggest "Sinai and Palestine Campaign; in the latter it fought..."
1054:
Yes, this is an issue better covered in a broader-ranging article
744:
in the lead and on first mention in the body, link "battle honour"
138:
Featured article candidates/Royal Gloucestershire Hussars/archive1
669:, which ceased to exist in 1908 when it was amalgamated into the 400:
date, it appears to be no later than 1867. Is that good enough?
1167:
Added information about high temperature and malaria problem.
1284:
Link Cheltenham in first sentence and first mention in body
944: 163: 128: 124: 960:
Brilliant! Did not know about that, and was concerned.
385:
Does Brown have any details on publication history?
1128:"15th Army Corps" - I suspect that this should be 1674:Thanks. Hope I've answered to your satisfaction. 1575:Napoleon's planned invasion of the United Kingdom 1143:defensive action (again no info in the sources). 1075:Changed a word to show that they were volunteers. 414:Okay, in that case the pre-1923 tag would work. 279:be sufficient proof of a 1910 publication date? 1705:in London that it will be easily confused with. 498:{{PD-1923}} seems appropriate. Will that do? 8: 1408:suggest "Army reserve" or "8th Army reserve" 922:same as above: "Neillands p. 82–84 & 86" 1499:Thank you for your help. Much appreciated. 367:When/where was this image first published? 229:When/where was this image first published? 1712:Did not know that. Clarified the location. 1686:are you happy with the responses? Cheers, 142: 1269:Placeholder. Will post comments shortly. 466:It appears that the image was taken from 545:Do not know. Is it not enough that the 145: 135: 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 7: 835:"close to the Lybian border" --: --> 33:The following discussion is closed. 1644:I wasn't quoting these, but using 28: 1830:The discussion above is closed. 1217:, but I hope I have done enough. 967:same as above for the Murphy work 1740: 1629: 1595: 1580: 1561: 1434: 1413: 1396: 1375: 1357: 1340: 1323: 1306: 1289: 1034: 995: 974: 952: 929: 908: 868: 858:just "Birley" at this point per 843: 821: 813:"was about 1,000 yeoman" --: --> 799: 774: 751: 729: 1205:43rd (Wessex) Infantry Division 72:« Return to A-Class review list 1682:) 14:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC) 1: 1258:09:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC) 1243:02:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC) 1227:15:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC) 1199:02:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC) 1156:02:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC) 1120:02:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC) 1096:02:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC) 1064:02:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC) 1018:12:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 717:11:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 653:14:35, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 634:18:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 620:16:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 598:15:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 576:02:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 562:18:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 522:14:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 508:01:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 494:18:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 480:16:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 468:The Navy and Army Illustrated 462:16:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 424:14:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 410:03:14, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 395:00:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 377:18:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 361:16:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 321:14:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 307:09:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 289:02:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 267:00:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC) 253:21:40, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 239:18:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 225:16:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 211:16:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC) 184:18:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC) 104:Royal Gloucestershire Hussars 80:Royal Gloucestershire Hussars 1823:16:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC) 1798:14:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC) 1778:16:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC) 1696:04:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC) 1621:Would prefer to leave as is. 836:"close to the Libyan border" 697:15:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 683:15:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 67:08:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC) 1663:13:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC) 1537:10:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC) 1523:09:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC) 1509:10:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 1494:03:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 1475:17:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 1279:02:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 1851: 1008:Much appreciated. Thanks. 788:"Between the Wars" --: --> 1577:or something like that?) 900:"Pitman p. 48–49" --: --> 814:"was about 1,000 yeomen"? 1832:Please do not modify it. 1484:That's me done. Cheers, 36:Please do not modify it. 857:"Lt-Col Birley" --: --> 789:"Between the wars" per 273:this NYPL catalog entry 1203:I suspect it was the 452:Working on this one. 201:Working on this one. 1692:click to talk to me 1519:click to talk to me 1490:click to talk to me 1275:click to talk to me 608:Imperial War Museum 311:Okay, that's fine. 901:"Pitman pp. 48–49" 687:Yes, looks good. 671:Territorial Force 667:Imperial Yeomanry 624:New tag is fine. 171: 170: 98: 75: 1842: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1587: 1584: 1583: 1568: 1565: 1564: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1364: 1361: 1360: 1347: 1344: 1343: 1330: 1327: 1326: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1086:That looks good 1041: 1038: 1037: 1002: 999: 998: 981: 978: 977: 959: 956: 955: 936: 933: 932: 915: 912: 911: 875: 872: 871: 850: 847: 846: 828: 825: 824: 806: 803: 802: 781: 778: 777: 758: 755: 754: 736: 733: 732: 709:AustralianRupert 664: 277:this Google book 143: 133: 132: 86: 69: 38: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1745: 1741: 1634: 1630: 1600: 1596: 1585: 1581: 1566: 1562: 1439: 1435: 1418: 1414: 1401: 1397: 1391:German salient" 1380: 1376: 1362: 1358: 1345: 1341: 1328: 1324: 1311: 1307: 1294: 1290: 1267:Support from PM 1039: 1035: 1000: 996: 979: 975: 957: 953: 934: 930: 913: 909: 873: 869: 848: 844: 826: 822: 804: 800: 791:WP:Section caps 779: 775: 756: 752: 734: 730: 658: 106: 102: 83: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 1848: 1846: 1837: 1836: 1826: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1801: 1800: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1763: 1762: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1707: 1706: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1646:simple glosses 1639: 1638: 1637: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1459: 1458: 1455: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1431: 1430: 1422: 1421: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1393: 1392: 1384: 1383: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1286: 1285: 1261: 1260: 1229: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 990: 989: 985: 984: 983: 982: 969: 968: 964: 963: 962: 961: 947: 946: 940: 939: 938: 937: 924: 923: 919: 918: 917: 916: 903: 902: 897: 896: 895: 894: 884: 883: 879: 878: 877: 876: 863: 862: 854: 853: 852: 851: 838: 837: 832: 831: 830: 829: 816: 815: 810: 809: 808: 807: 794: 793: 785: 784: 783: 782: 769: 768: 763: 762: 761: 760: 746: 745: 741: 740: 739: 738: 724: 723: 702: 701: 700: 699: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 601: 600: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 540: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 447: 446: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 343: 342: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 291: 196: 195: 169: 168: 167: 166: 164:External links 161: 156: 148: 147: 141: 140: 100: 99: 88:Nominator(s): 82: 77: 43: 42: 41: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1847: 1835: 1833: 1828: 1827: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1753: 1752: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1731: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1647: 1643: 1642: 1640: 1628: 1627: 1625: 1620: 1619: 1617: 1611: 1610: 1608: 1594: 1593: 1591: 1579: 1578: 1576: 1572: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1549: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1423: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1266: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1206: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1138: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1106: 1105: 1103: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1084: 1082: 1081: 1079: 1074: 1073: 1071: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1033: 1032: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1026: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1011: 994: 993: 992: 991: 987: 986: 973: 972: 971: 970: 966: 965: 951: 950: 949: 948: 945: 942: 941: 928: 927: 926: 925: 921: 920: 907: 906: 905: 904: 899: 898: 892: 888: 887: 886: 885: 881: 880: 867: 866: 865: 864: 861: 856: 855: 842: 841: 840: 839: 834: 833: 820: 819: 818: 817: 812: 811: 798: 797: 796: 795: 792: 787: 786: 773: 772: 771: 770: 765: 764: 750: 749: 748: 747: 743: 742: 728: 727: 726: 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 714: 710: 706: 698: 694: 690: 686: 685: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 662: 657: 656: 655: 654: 650: 646: 635: 631: 627: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 604: 603: 602: 599: 595: 591: 587: 586: 577: 573: 569: 565: 564: 563: 559: 555: 551: 550: 548: 544: 543: 542: 541: 537: 536: 523: 519: 515: 511: 510: 509: 505: 501: 497: 496: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 464: 463: 459: 455: 451: 450: 449: 448: 443: 442: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412: 411: 407: 403: 398: 397: 396: 392: 388: 384: 383: 380: 379: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 358: 354: 350: 347: 346: 345: 344: 340: 339: 322: 318: 314: 310: 309: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255: 254: 250: 246: 242: 241: 240: 236: 232: 228: 227: 226: 222: 218: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 200: 199: 198: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 186: 185: 181: 177: 165: 162: 160: 157: 155: 152: 151: 150: 149: 144: 139: 136: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 97: 95: 91: 85: 84: 81: 78: 76: 74: 73: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 51:Cinderella157 48: 40: 37: 31: 30: 23: 19: 1831: 1829: 1811: 1703:Petty France 1688:Peacemaker67 1673: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1515:Peacemaker67 1486:Peacemaker67 1483: 1426: 1388: 1271:Peacemaker67 1264: 1263: 1262: 1230: 1214: 1212: 1146:Fair enough 1023: 1022: 1021: 1007: 704: 703: 642: 467: 348: 189:Image review 188: 187: 172: 159:Citation bot 101: 87: 71: 46: 44: 35: 32: 1425:"The three 1429:squadrons" 891:WP:SURNAME 860:WP:SURNAME 689:Nikkimaria 661:Nikkimaria 626:Nikkimaria 590:Nikkimaria 554:Nikkimaria 547:AWM source 514:Nikkimaria 486:Nikkimaria 416:Nikkimaria 387:Nikkimaria 369:Nikkimaria 313:Nikkimaria 259:Nikkimaria 231:Nikkimaria 59:MilHistBot 22:Assessment 295:NYPL page 1815:Factotem 1790:Hchc2009 1770:Factotem 1684:Hchc2009 1676:Factotem 1655:Hchc2009 1548:Comments 1529:Factotem 1501:Factotem 1467:Factotem 1265:Comments 1250:Factotem 1219:Factotem 1134:Changed. 1130:XV Corps 1024:Comments 1010:FactotEm 675:Factotem 645:FactotEm 612:FactotEm 568:FactotEm 500:FactotEm 472:FactotEm 454:FactotEm 402:FactotEm 353:FactotEm 299:FactotEm 281:FactotEm 245:FactotEm 217:FactotEm 203:FactotEm 176:FactotEm 154:Analysis 90:Factotem 47:promoted 45:Article 20:‎ | 1668:quotes. 1550:Support 1231:Support 1047:order. 705:Support 445:missing 146:Toolbox 117:history 1557:hussar 1235:Nick-D 1191:Nick-D 1148:Nick-D 1112:Nick-D 1088:Nick-D 1056:Nick-D 57:) via 1215:fully 759:done. 512:Yes. 271:Will 125:watch 121:links 16:< 1819:talk 1794:talk 1774:talk 1680:talk 1659:talk 1604:you. 1533:talk 1505:talk 1471:talk 1254:talk 1239:talk 1223:talk 1195:talk 1152:talk 1116:talk 1092:talk 1060:talk 1014:talk 713:talk 693:talk 679:talk 649:talk 630:talk 616:talk 594:talk 572:talk 558:talk 518:talk 504:talk 490:talk 476:talk 458:talk 420:talk 406:talk 391:talk 373:talk 357:talk 349:done 317:talk 303:talk 285:talk 263:talk 249:talk 235:talk 221:talk 207:talk 180:talk 129:logs 113:talk 109:edit 94:talk 63:talk 55:talk 1387:"a 275:or 49:by 1821:) 1796:) 1776:) 1694:) 1661:) 1535:) 1521:) 1507:) 1492:) 1473:) 1277:) 1256:) 1241:) 1225:) 1197:) 1154:) 1118:) 1094:) 1062:) 1016:) 715:) 695:) 681:) 651:) 632:) 618:) 596:) 574:) 560:) 520:) 506:) 492:) 478:) 460:) 422:) 408:) 393:) 375:) 359:) 351:. 319:) 305:) 287:) 265:) 251:) 237:) 223:) 209:) 182:) 127:| 123:| 119:| 115:| 111:| 65:) 1817:( 1792:( 1772:( 1746:Y 1690:( 1678:( 1657:( 1635:Y 1601:Y 1586:Y 1567:Y 1531:( 1517:( 1503:( 1488:( 1469:( 1440:Y 1427:S 1419:Y 1402:Y 1389:g 1381:Y 1363:Y 1346:Y 1329:Y 1312:Y 1295:Y 1273:( 1252:( 1237:( 1221:( 1193:( 1150:( 1114:( 1090:( 1058:( 1040:Y 1012:( 1001:Y 980:Y 958:Y 935:Y 914:Y 874:Y 849:Y 827:Y 805:Y 780:Y 757:Y 735:Y 711:( 691:( 677:( 663:: 659:@ 647:( 628:( 614:( 592:( 570:( 556:( 516:( 502:( 488:( 474:( 456:( 418:( 404:( 389:( 371:( 355:( 315:( 301:( 283:( 261:( 247:( 233:( 219:( 205:( 178:( 131:) 107:( 96:) 92:( 61:( 53:(

Index

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
Assessment
Cinderella157
talk
MilHistBot
talk
08:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
« Return to A-Class review list
Royal Gloucestershire Hussars
Factotem
talk
Royal Gloucestershire Hussars
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
Featured article candidates/Royal Gloucestershire Hussars/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
FactotEm
talk
18:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
FactotEm
talk
16:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
FactotEm
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.