348:
I find the level of detail a bit light for GA myself; although that assessment is designed for shorter articles, I myself wouldn't submit one of mine for GAR without a bit more meat on it. If you can't find any more sources, you could still exploit her ADB entry for further detail (e.g. early life,
147:
I disagree. Although there is only a limited amount of information in two of the sections, the article flows logically and has a sophisticated structure. If these were to be cut out, I believe the structure would be rather confusing and poorly presented. Just my thoughts, and it is up to
Backslash
143:
Personally as the article stands you could do this is just 2 sections - Military life with a subsection on her award and non-military life. There is not enough info for either early or late life to stand on their own.
101:
Although I don't think it is a requirement, it is preferred that consecutive cites go in numerical order. For instance: "She was discharged on 22 June 1919.". In this case, it is preferred that the goes before the
79:
The access dates in citations are inconsistent, with some capitalised and others not. I think this is due to differing cite templates. In order to remedy this, I would recommend the use of
140:
subsection need to be either expanded or merged, especially the former. Short sections, especially the Early life, won't be able to stand on their own for higher quality articles.
21:
17:
345:
The first thing needed for any future assessment was a copyedit to fix typos, improve phrasing and add some clarity, which I've had a go at.
229:
Are any of the other 6 women known? They should be linked to or put in a footnote after the note about them if you have the information.
162:
I'm sure trying to scrape everything I can on the early life and later life sections, as without it the article would be incoherent.
362:
324:
301:
287:
267:
214:
191:
177:
157:
115:
52:
283:
173:
48:
91:
for book sources listed in "References" section. Also, it is best that the place of publishment be added to the book sources.
67:
317:
260:
207:
276:
166:
41:
297:
187:
153:
111:
94:
If you are aiming to progress further up the quality scale with the article, then I would recommend you add
349:
which would help negate Jinnai's concerns re. having a separate section for that) and perhaps some others.
236:
106:
This is all for the moment, but hopefully I will be back soon to go through the prose. :) Cheers,
73:
358:
293:
183:
149:
107:
88:
80:
246:
312:
255:
202:
341:
Good to see such an article - well done. In addition to points raised above, my thoughts:
182:
I think s/he means the actual subheadings, rather than the information itself. ;-) Cheers,
95:
37:
Just classed at B following expansion, was hoping for some tips on how to get to GA level.
249:. Stuff like 1st of September should be redone to formatting for the rest of the article.
31:
354:
307:
250:
197:
62:
Looks pretty good so far. Just a few general comments for the moment, though:
76:
are required in all date ranges in the article, and page ranges in citations.
196:
Indeed. Don't remove the info. However it should be structured better.
292:
I found two, but one was a quote. Fixed the other, though. Cheers,
272:
I couldn't find any "st of" in the article. Where did you see it?
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
125:Good start, but there are some problems.
83:for internet sources (stick with the
7:
245:The article needs to conform with
28:
1:
68:National Library of Australia
363:10:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
325:03:36, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
302:00:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
288:23:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
268:19:35, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
215:03:36, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
192:00:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
178:23:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
158:23:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
116:23:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
87:temp for that though), and
53:14:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
378:
306:Looks like it was fixed.
277:Backslash Forwardslash
167:Backslash Forwardslash
148:Forwardslash. Cheers,
42:Backslash Forwardslash
89:Template:Cite book
81:Template:Cite web
66:I would wikilink
369:
321:
315:
310:
264:
258:
253:
241:
235:
211:
205:
200:
377:
376:
372:
371:
370:
368:
367:
366:
339:
322:
319:
313:
308:
265:
262:
256:
251:
239:
233:
212:
209:
203:
198:
123:
60:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
375:
373:
351:
350:
346:
338:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
318:
261:
243:
242:to the article
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
208:
122:
119:
104:
103:
99:
98:to the images.
92:
85:London Gazette
77:
71:
59:
56:
34:
32:Pearl Corkhill
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
374:
365:
364:
360:
356:
347:
344:
343:
342:
336:
326:
323:
316:
311:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
294:Abraham, B.S.
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
278:
275:
271:
270:
269:
266:
259:
254:
248:
244:
238:
231:
228:
216:
213:
206:
201:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
184:Abraham, B.S.
181:
180:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
161:
160:
159:
155:
151:
150:Abraham, B.S.
146:
145:
142:
141:
139:
138:Later service
136:sections and
135:
131:
128:
127:
126:
120:
118:
117:
113:
109:
108:Abraham, B.S.
100:
97:
93:
90:
86:
82:
78:
75:
72:
69:
65:
64:
63:
58:Abraham, B.S.
57:
55:
54:
50:
46:
43:
40:
33:
30:
23:
19:
352:
340:
279:
273:
169:
163:
137:
133:
129:
124:
105:
84:
70:in the lead.
61:
44:
38:
36:
22:Peer review
237:persondata
134:Later life
130:Early life
355:Ian Rose
353:Cheers,
337:Ian Rose
96:alt text
74:Endashes
20: |
247:WP:DATE
320:Jinnai
263:Jinnai
210:Jinnai
121:Jinnai
16:<
359:talk
298:talk
284:talk
232:add
188:talk
174:talk
154:talk
132:and
112:talk
49:talk
361:)
300:)
286:)
240:}}
234:{{
190:)
176:)
156:)
114:)
51:)
357:(
314:内
309:陣
296:(
282:(
280:/
274:\
257:内
252:陣
204:内
199:陣
186:(
172:(
170:/
164:\
152:(
110:(
102:.
47:(
45:/
39:\
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.