794:
know of the leadership versus the popular perception that
Spartacus led his followers in a quasi traditional command/control structure, has become remembered as "the leader" of a slave army fighting for it's freedom, when according to Plutarch he wanted to do just that, and his followers balked evidently so they could continue to raid and loot. Anyway, the popular perception is of course wrong from what we know, and can guess) - I think you will have to make the decision on whether or not to include the strong commendation of his character by Plutarch, and then try to explain historically in more detail what we know of the leadership. I think you are right on the issue of the captives fighting to the death - several writers have dismissed those claims as Roman propaganda to diminish Spartacus after the end of the War. Even if it was true, could Spartacus have prevented it, had he wanted to? That also is unknown. Plutarch strongly believed Spartacus wanted to lead his followers to freedom, but was evidently was unable to persude them, and would not abandon them. But I do think you are right that the issue of his wanting to lead his men to freedom over the Alps might be a topic more clearly spelled out. I still think you have done such an outstanding job that you should make these decisions.
263:
accuracy of the article, it is outstanding. You used primary sources, and did so with good solid writing. I am fairly familiar with the period, certainly with how
Crassus and Pompey used the threat of the Slave/Gladitor rebellions to manipulate, subvert and weaken the Republic. I agree that you cannot expand the "in popular culture" section because most of what is in "popular culture" about the Third Servile War is a misunderstood myth about Spartacus. Historians don't know whether he was anti-slavery or not; they guess at his intentions. You put it very well that people are guessing at intentions based on events of a failed rebellion. Moreover, in popular myth there are no slave commanders except Spartacus and due to a book by Howard Fast and Kubrick's movie, he has become some sort of mythical romantic hero. (And he may have been such a man - we simply do not know, and this article does an excellent job of retelling what we do know from the primary sources, piercing the myth only one leader existed in the Third Servile War for the slaves/gladiators, and laying out what facts are available, and allowing readers to make their own conclusions) An excellent job.
395:"During the conflict, an army of escaped slaves eventually numbering around 120,000, under command of the famous gladiator-general Spartacus, raided the Italian countryside; defeated several Roman armies sent out to capture or destroy them; and — according to some historical accounts — attempted to escape northwards to freedom over the Alps in Cisalpine Gaul but for reasons that are unclear turned back southwards to occupy parts of southern Italy."
758:. While most historical depictions of the war focus on Spartacus, he was one of several leaders - even though he may have been the main leader behind the rebellion. If details on Spartacus are included, should there be a discussion on how the leadership of the rebellion was structured - or at least as much as we know?
399:
The numbers of captured slaves are too small for such an army. 5,000 or 6,000 are mentioned. So they can not all have been fighters, but in a military sense these number also included camp followers. Traditionally army strength is listed without mentioning their numbers, sometimes they are estimated.
418:
It is very good, that you worked out the military background of
Spartacus. I can tell you in some hours the source, Spartacus used a trick, his soldiers had a tactical advantage towards other enemys of the Romans. They used leather shields. These could be penetrated by a pilum, but were not rendered
279:
Phenomenal article. It will easily get to FA status. My suggestions are mostly trivial. The
Popular culture section could still be written in summary style even with the material you now have. It might not be a bad idea to give some short descriptions of the artistic works you list (or alternatively
287:
It may be a matter of stylistic preference, but perhaps the first three sections (ending with the
Motives of the escaped slaves) could all be grouped under a 'Background' or 'Prelude' mother section. For someone unfamiliar with the history, the current state of the article might give the impression
793:
In considering your thoughts, I see your point and I am uncertain to what extent you should focus on
Spartacus - he has become the symbol for the rebellion even though he was only part of the leadership (another suggestion for your consideration - should this be mentioned, in discussing what we do
523:
given. In the text it is stated as 8 legions, and in the infobox estimated at 40,000-50,000. This would fit nicely with the "1 in 10" rule for decimating the entire army. Perhaps the 40,000 - 50,000 should be added to the text. I don't have a reference at hand which states the standard size of the
345:
Not that it matters, but I think every classical military history I have read considers the Capuan revolt and the early battles with the
Praetorian armis as part of the war. Speaking personally, I would say that would have to be true because they were the opening acts of what the Romans initially
734:
The article does detail that
Plutarch credited Spartacus with wanting to lead his men to freedom, but the majority evidently preferred looting Italy. And given that Spartacus allowed 300 prisoners to battle to the death for the amusement of their captors, one has to question somewhat Plutarch's
242:
Very nice work; all of my concerns appear to have been fixed, and the text has become rather stronger since the last time I looked at this. One point to consider might be expanding the first paragraph of the lead to summarize the next three; ideally, the dates and outcome should be clear after
280:
you can adopt Kirill's suggestion). You don't necessarily have to be extremely familiar with these works; just do a few google searches to familiarize yourself and then write the descriptions. That should get you at least two paragraphs and obstruct calls for the section's deletion (which will
262:
This is one of the best organized, best researched, and best sourced articles I have had the pleasure of reviewing on wikipedia. You did an outstanding job. I looked at the earlier versions, and the changes you made with the maps addressed most of Kirill's suggestions. As to the historical
298:
Thank you very much for your kind words :) As you can see from the discussion above, I removed "In popular culture" section as less relevant to the history. As for your grouping suggestion, I'm somewhat torn. I consider the Capuan revolt and the initial clashes with the praetorian armis as
404:"an event in which up to 4,000 legionaries would have been executed" Is known about the decimation. OK, I know that in a decimation every tenth man is killed, so the total number must have been 40,000 before this event. But information on the Roman troopstrength is really missing.
601:
true that there are a number of smaller battles during the retreat to
Messana (which I kind of "glossed over") in which the numbers involved are smaller - but this is also explained in Appian. I can add this point in, and explain it, if you think expanding this point is
41:
beat into "acceptable" shape. However, any one writer/editor has blind spots, so I would very much like to hear input, thoughts, criticisms, and suggestions as to how the article might be improved - especially comments/suggestions on how to improve the prose and style.
415:) there have been many crushed servile revolts. What was the reason for these revolts? What did change after these revolts? This is important to understand how 70 escaped gladiators could create such a storm and it is important to understand the initial Roman view.
640:: Large numbers of slaves in Italia (up to 1/3 the general population according to some estimates), the general hard life of an agricultural slave, etc. Again, I lack references specific to the state of slaves in Republican Rome. Can anyone help with this?
721:
In reviewing my
Plutarch on this war, one suggestion I would make as to the article is that Plutarch gave a fairly detailed and interesting description of Spartacus, which I believe should be in the article. Plutarch said that Spartacus was:
613:
You mention engagements and state such small numbers as captured while there are only much bigger numbers of participants mentioned. I estimated, that this is more likely the result of smaller engagements, but you give no numbers for this.
767:
The episode about forcing 300 captives to fight to the death is mentioned in Appian's version - as is the comment about "putting all the prisoners to death and slaughtering the draught animals". Again, a contrast between Appian and
673:
As far as the tactical advantages (leather shields, etc) that Spartacus had over the Roman troops, I have not seen anything to this effect (other than the mention of some of Spartacus' more inspired moves in Frontinus'
197:, if they're not already there). Unless there's something significant to be said about these works from a scholarly standpoint—and this appears not to be the case here—there's little benefit to retaining a mere list.
70:
Would the article lose a great deal by removing the "In popular culture" section? I'm not convinced historical articles require these - even though it seems to be a current wikipedia fad. The effects of the
777:
The point about wanting to escape over the Alps while his men prefered to stay and loot is referenced indirectly in two places, but I think you're right in that it needs to be more clearly spelled out. -
94:
I've incorporated a number of changes based on suggestions from this review, and others. I would appreciate it if people might re-examine the article after these changes based on your suggestions :) -
149:
A little more material in the popular culture section might be appropriate; at the very least, it might be worthwhile to mention the extent to which the various depictions are historically accurate.
355:
I've grouped the Capuan revolt and the defeat of the Praetorian armies under their own section, and left the section on motives a "top level" section. Hopefully this adds a little clarity. -
180:
Unfortunately, I can't expand the "In popular culture" as I've not read/seen most of the listed depictions - only Kubrick's film. Other editors will have to do that, I guess :) -
161:
to take part in this review, as they have a far better knowledge of the period than I do, and may actually be able to comment at greater length on the historical material itself.
21:
114:
The maps are set very large and heavily stacked; I would shrink them to 300px and stagger them across both margins to prevent the impression of a continous column of images.
311:
the slaves have apparent "free reign" to do as they please. Would it make sense to make this a sub-section of the "Defeat of the praetorian armies (73 BC)" section? -
346:
foolishly thought was merely a minor slave problem, but quite obviously ended up in a war that ended up requiring most of the Republic's resources to subdue.
441:
Admittedly the figure 120,000, taken from Appian's history says in the 1913 Loeb classical library edition (I'm not sure who the translator is in this case)
288:
that those sections were actually part of the war. But again, that's not a big deal and shouldn't affect anyone's votes in FAC. Terrific article overall.
481:
after burning the useless equipment and putting all the prisoners to death and slaughtering the draught animals to free himself of all encumbrances....
58:
Is the entry summary too "scrunched up"? I tried to make it concise, but it may be trying to cram too many events into too small a space. Comments? -
17:
493:
However, I would concur that perhaps calling this the "army size" is misleading, as I agree that this is more than likely the size of the entire
419:
useless, nor is a pilum construction likely to break or bend if sticking in such a shield, so it is useable, contrary to hitting a Roman scutum.
175:
changes seem to prompt. I also managed to remove one map which was really only a "set up" for the map following it, and not really needed.
798:
782:
739:
712:
697:
655:
618:
558:
423:
380:
359:
350:
332:
315:
292:
267:
247:
227:
184:
165:
98:
87:
62:
49:
580:
mentions of the size of Spartacus's followers, and the estimates grow - 10,000, 70,000 and finally 120,000 (as stated above probably
407:
While other reports from the Classic state how it was possible to recruit slaves to help their former owners in military conflicts (
37:
After much blood, sweat, and tears in researching, editing, writing, and map-creation, I think I've finally got the article on the
171:
Thank you for the swift response. I've incorporated many of your suggestions, as well as some of the organizational changes that
693:
a wooden shield, where it is not possible to pull out. I will try a formulation that fits better and make some more research.
690:
374:
Again, an outstanding article. Historically accurate, from primary sources, well written, and very well structured.
651:
Will try, a system of pocket money was introduced afterwards and no slave was forced to fight as gladiator any more.
597:, then this varies: 30,000 at mount Garganus, 60,000 in the final conflct, 35,000 in one of the later skirmishes. It
392:
There are some points which seem strange and others that could do with a link to other articles or an explanation.
728:"a man not only of high spirit and bravery, but also in understanding and gentleness superior to his condition."
223:
rather than historical. Plus the article is over the recommended largest size already. I removed the section. -
636:
If I understand you correctly, I like the idea of explaining the sociological setup that made the servile wars
146:
needs to be turned into a normal campaignbox. (Why do people keep creating these non-standard boxes anyways?!)
708:
All in all some good criticism, and a good handle of some aventues for improving the article. Thank you :) -
140:
453:
and marched on Rome with 120,000 foot, having burned all his useless material, killed all his prisoners...
795:
736:
692:, it is very flexible. The rest comes from reading the description of what a pilum needs to work -: -->
377:
347:
264:
253:
154:
552:
William Smith, D.C.L., LL.D.: A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, John Murray, London, 1875.
110:
This looks to be a very good article; most of my concerns are rather technical points of formatting:
694:
652:
615:
420:
386:
244:
198:
162:
158:
104:
307:
an aside of a type, and not really part of the narrative. Yet, it doesn't really make sense until
120:
It's cleaner, in my opinion, to put the date in parentheses after the title than to start with it.
408:
576:
I'm not sure what you mean by "5,000 or 6,000 are mentioned". In Appian and others, there are
80:
31:
412:
289:
273:
400:
This way, the number under Spartacus command makes more sense, for they needed supplies.
790:
779:
718:
709:
555:
371:
356:
329:
312:
259:
224:
181:
95:
84:
59:
46:
735:
description of his character. Nonetheless, I would suggest it might be included.
747:
That is something I did wrestle with. I'm not sure at what point details about
755:
220:
216:
194:
76:
678:). Again - do you have any sources that might aid in fleshing this out?
497:. I'll edit the intro to reflect this "soldiers and followers" perhaps?
193:
You could probably get away with removing it (and adding the links to
126:"The war in popular culture" can be shortened to "In popular culture";
129:
The "Bibliography" section should, I assume, be titled "References"?
132:
The "Notes & Citations" section can be shortened to "Notes".
75:
of Spartacus might be better incorporated into the the article
45:
Thank you in advance for any (constructive) comments made :) -
303:
of the war. The section discussing the motives of the slaves
528:(I know the "standard legion size" varied historically). I
219:
in modern culture, I think it is probably all literary and
689:
Yes, leather shields and their construction is mentioned
325:
123:
The dates for "Appian" and "Plutarch" are redundant.
284:be forthcoming if you take it to FAC like this).
532:it was around 4,000 - 5,000 - but I don't have a
243:reading it. Other than that, this looks great!
429:Thank you for your feedback :) Let me rebut :)
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
215:scholarly to be said for the portrayal of
584:the total number of effective fighters).
465:While the John Carter translation says:
117:Some issues with the section headings:
7:
536:. Would you happen to know of one?
28:
477:made for Rome with 120,000 foot
211:Agreed. While I'm sure there is
799:03:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
783:02:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
751:should be left to the article
740:01:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
713:17:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
698:22:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
656:22:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
619:22:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
559:17:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
424:14:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
248:15:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
99:09:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
519:. Still, the troop stretngth
381:23:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
360:22:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
351:22:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
333:22:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
316:22:00, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
293:21:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
268:21:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
228:21:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
185:19:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
166:19:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
88:21:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
63:19:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
50:16:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
153:I would also suggest asking
511:Again, the figures are not
814:
526:at this time in history
593:If you mean mentioned
238:Comments after changes
79:, and removed from
409:Battle of Marathon
81:Third Servile War
68:Further Question:
39:Third Servile War
32:Third Servile War
805:
145:
139:
813:
812:
808:
807:
806:
804:
803:
802:
413:Third Punic War
390:
383:
277:
257:
143:
137:
108:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
811:
809:
796:old windy bear
788:
787:
786:
785:
772:
771:
770:
769:
762:
761:
760:
759:
737:old windy bear
732:
731:
730:
729:
716:
715:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
695:Wandalstouring
682:
681:
680:
679:
668:
667:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
653:Wandalstouring
644:
643:
642:
641:
631:
630:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
616:Wandalstouring
606:
605:
604:
603:
595:per engagement
588:
587:
586:
585:
571:
570:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
540:
539:
538:
537:
506:
505:
501:
500:
499:
498:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
469:
468:
467:
466:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
445:
444:
443:
442:
436:
435:
431:
430:
421:Wandalstouring
402:
401:
389:
387:Wandalstouring
384:
378:old windy bear
376:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
348:old windy bear
338:
337:
336:
335:
319:
318:
276:
271:
265:old windy bear
256:
254:old windy bear
251:
245:Kirill Lokshin
240:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
204:
203:
202:
201:
199:Kirill Lokshin
188:
187:
177:
176:
163:Kirill Lokshin
159:Wandalstouring
151:
150:
147:
141:RomanCivilWars
135:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
121:
115:
107:
105:Kirill Lokshin
102:
92:
91:
90:
83:completely. -
65:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
810:
801:
800:
797:
792:
784:
781:
776:
775:
774:
773:
766:
765:
764:
763:
757:
754:
750:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
738:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
720:
714:
711:
707:
706:
699:
696:
691:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
677:
672:
671:
670:
669:
665:
664:
657:
654:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
639:
635:
634:
633:
632:
628:
627:
620:
617:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
583:
579:
575:
574:
573:
572:
568:
567:
560:
557:
553:
550:found one in
549:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
535:
531:
527:
524:Roman legion
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
503:
502:
496:
492:
491:
490:
489:
482:
480:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
464:
463:
462:
461:
454:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
440:
439:
438:
437:
433:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
422:
416:
414:
410:
405:
398:
397:
396:
393:
388:
385:
382:
379:
375:
373:
361:
358:
354:
353:
352:
349:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
334:
331:
327:
324:Or how about
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
296:
295:
294:
291:
285:
283:
275:
272:
270:
269:
266:
261:
255:
252:
250:
249:
246:
237:
236:
229:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
200:
196:
192:
191:
190:
189:
186:
183:
179:
178:
174:
170:
169:
168:
167:
164:
160:
156:
148:
142:
136:
131:
128:
125:
122:
119:
118:
116:
113:
112:
111:
106:
103:
101:
100:
97:
89:
86:
82:
78:
74:
69:
66:
64:
61:
57:
54:
53:
52:
51:
48:
43:
40:
33:
30:
23:
19:
789:
752:
748:
733:
717:
675:
637:
598:
594:
581:
577:
551:
547:
533:
529:
525:
520:
516:
512:
494:
478:
476:
452:
417:
406:
403:
394:
391:
370:
308:
304:
300:
286:
281:
278:
258:
241:
221:sociological
212:
172:
155:oldwindybear
152:
109:
93:
72:
67:
55:
44:
38:
36:
602:worthwhile.
22:Peer review
676:Stratagems
290:UberCryxic
274:UberCryxic
768:Plutarch.
756:Spartacus
749:Spartacus
629:Fourthly,
548:Addendum:
534:reference
504:Secondly,
282:certainly
217:Spartacus
213:something
195:Spartacus
77:Spartacus
56:Question:
791:Vedexent
780:Vedexent
719:Vedexent
710:Vedexent
666:Fifthly,
638:possible
569:Thirdly,
556:Vedexent
479:soldiers
372:Vedexent
357:Vedexent
330:Vedexent
313:Vedexent
260:Vedexent
225:Vedexent
182:Vedexent
96:Vedexent
85:Vedexent
60:Vedexent
47:Vedexent
20: |
578:several
530:believe
517:Appians
434:Firstly
515:, but
73:legend
309:after
173:those
16:<
554:. -
513:mine
495:band
328:? -
326:this
301:part
157:and
582:not
753:on
599:is
521:is
411:,
305:is
144:}}
138:{{
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.