Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Tribal class destroyer (1936) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

675:(I know its listed in the ship tables above, but having that information in some nice, meaty paragraphs is also good). In this section, you could cover how many were lost to enemy action (and highlight any particularly noteworthy losses), how many were scrapped and any decisions influencing the scrapping (i.e. is there a reason three Canadian ships were scrapped in the same year? Why were Canadian and Australian ships kept in service longer than their Britsh counterparts? etc. - no panic if there isn't actually a reason for these), what classes replaced the Tribals in the various navies, as well as the current information on one museum ship and one dive site. 1172: 742: 714: 616: 516: 127: 96: 674:
One drive-by observation: I'm really uncomfortable with the section "The ships today", both as a heading an as a section (as it currently only contains two dot points. One idea might be to expand this out to a "Fates" (or other heading) section, which deals with what happened to the class as a whole
1197:
I've also done more expansion of the service history of the class; most of the service data for the British and Canadian ships are largely done for the World War II period, while I still need to work on the Australian history as well. I would also need more information on the post war service for
1134:
I've done some more work citing the article, and making modifications as I felt necessary. One question however; for a article on a class of ships, does the picture in the infobox has to be one of the lead ship, as I have located another picture in a different article that I feel is of better
1159:
However, use of the museum ship Haida poses a slight problem, as a different photo from almost the same angle is used to illustrate the "Post-war" section. I suggest replacing this second image with something showing a different view of Haida. --
483:
got through A-class with it becuase it was borderline, but I had to get rid of it during the FAC. It's your choice to replace it or not, but if you find a different source that says the same thing, you may as well replace it. :) Cheers!
885:
LOL spent an hour rewriting the "fates" section today, and now it's been completely rewritten. I admit the new version is better, just wish Saberwyn had rewrote the section before I did, could've done something else with that hour :(
37:
I'm currently working on this article for a while, trying to improve the article, but I can use some pointers as to how to proceed next. The article in my opinion does not qualify to be a B-class article but it is getting there.
175:
I have found it reliable; I have used the source multiple times in university papers, and none of my history professors have made any comments that the source was not reliable. But as a precaution, I have posted a request at
686:, and this can bog down any future attempts at A-class, Good Article, and/or Featured Article status). I prefer books to websites, and citations should include the specific page number the statement was derived from. 21: 932:
So how do you guys think of the progress so far? I want to expand the introduction some more (aiming for 2 paragraphs), and I will finish citing and expanding the subsections
736:
Spell out measurements and terms... non-maritime people do not have an idea what an o/a is, and non-Imperial-measurement people will be confused by references to "4.7 guns".
959:
Looking MUCH better! Your plan is good too, as the lead is still too short. Again, consider merging some of the years (i.e. 1940–1941 etc, making sure to use an
835:
It's up to you guys whether you deem it necessary or not, I agree that "Survivors" may not be appropriate then. However the word "Fates" sounds very peculiar.
826:
The problem is, there is only one survivor, which is why I rolled it in with "Fates". An entire section in the class article for one ship seems excessive. --
992:
Alright, how about the current page as is? I've done the merge of the two sections, and finished the citations and minor expansions of the service part.
1207: 1187: 1164: 1154: 1144: 1120: 1087: 1066: 1026: 1001: 987: 953: 902: 880: 851: 830: 821: 806: 772: 757: 729: 663: 631: 607: 531: 508: 470: 362: 329: 315: 282: 266: 223: 203: 189: 142: 111: 79: 47: 17: 194:
Looks like the source is deemed reliable enough, as the facts are not controversial enough, but it would be nice to gain access to their sources.
418:
about this book—Fitzsimons, Bernard, ed. (1978). Illustrated Encyclopedia of 20th Century Weapons and Warfare, Volume 1. London: Phoebus.
944:
sections (I may just dump the Post-War section and merge it with the "Fates" section (I might rename it to Post-War or something else).
404:, use the "Only limited and full preview" option though. Basically, with that option, you can read books online for free! :D :D :D 291:
to have in-line citations to even approach B-class...that's going to be the complaint of every other person who comes here. :) —
1150:
I'm of the opinion that the top pic should be one that best illustrates the ship. If this is not the class lead, so be it. --
31: 153:
are needed everywhere...(including the tables)...if you want, tomorrow I'll take a gander through the article and add
1010:. As the author of an FA class warship article, I'd recommend just copying it and changing the relevant information. 963:) and it would be a good idea to merge Post-war and Fates, as they talk about (mostly) the same things. :) Cheers! — 1039: 570:{{cite web |url= |title= |accessmonthday=October 30 |accessyear=2008 |last= |first= |date= |work= |publisher= }} 1053: 966: 682:, in order to head off issues like challenged facts or unverifiability (I personally believe that every fact 650: 586: 487: 449: 341: 294: 245: 1203: 1183: 1140: 997: 949: 817: 753: 725: 627: 527: 325: 278: 199: 185: 138: 107: 75: 43: 579:
ref so that the dates are not linked... Easier to format them right when you add them in! =/ (I got lucky—
1032: 783: 705: 87: 216: 701: 1199: 1179: 1136: 1083: 1058: 1022: 993: 980: 945: 898: 876: 847: 813: 802: 749: 721: 655: 623: 600: 523: 501: 463: 355: 321: 308: 274: 259: 195: 181: 134: 118:
Combine some of the 194_ sections, as one sentence sections are too short. (1943, 1944, Post-war)
103: 71: 39: 678:
As for the citation issue raised by the ed_17 above, when I work on articles I attempt to cite
559: 371:
want me to litter the article with those tags, I'll go off of what Saberwyn said: try to cite
683: 150: 62: 1006:
The lead still needs expanding, a lot, it would be ideal to make it look similar to the one
177: 415: 232:
Anyway, I hope that this helped! Drop me a line on my talk page if you want me to add the
375:, as it will help you get through those higher levels if you cite everything you add now. 338:
after this (=]) but I'll run through it at some point tomorrow to add the tags. Cheers! —
167: 1161: 1151: 1117: 1106: 1072: 1048: 1011: 974: 887: 865: 836: 827: 791: 769: 645: 594: 495: 457: 349: 302: 253: 236: 211: 157: 580: 764:
Could use a text copyedit, but then again, what article couldn't benefit from one?
421: 273:
Yeah, go ahead and be as critical as you can be. I can really use the feedback.
1198:
both the Australian and Canadian Tribals to continue to flesh out the article.
479:(BB-36)'s FAC, Hazegray (current ref#2) is not reliable... very unfortunately. 639: 1116:
need a supporting citation, but overall it is starting to take shape. --
334:
Oh, I see what you meant now. I have class tomorrow, so I'm going to bed
320:
I need to know where so I can add them in, so be as critical as you can.
1102:
Progressing quite nicely. I've done a bit of a copyedit and thrown some
121:"The ships today" section is almost hidden under all of those tables... 960: 90:, text should not be sandwiched between two images ("1941" section) 1071:
An even better idea, although don't forget the Iowa article is FA.
700:
common terms (things like dates, countries, and measurements - see
575:
Why? Because the people at FAC will make you go through and change
1007: 768:
Hit me on my talk page if you need any help or clarification. --
860:
sounds? The article is about the class after all, and this is "
401: 70:
I've expanded the lead somewhat, but it is a work in progress.
916: 378:
Try these things that have helped me with my articles:
149:
If you want it to have a chance at B-class, many more
1031:
Actually, try copying and combining the intros from
411:by John Campbell... ... (is this on Google Books?) 57:This is a quick run-through before I go to bed: 693:a little more content in the "Service" section 8: 786:page's lead. Furthering what Saberwyn said; 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 565:, use the "non-linked retrieval date" i.e. 65:...make it a summary of the entire article. 689:In other news, I'd personally like to see 180:to double check, and will have a result. 208:Maybe shoot them an e-mail? I dunno... — 446:Anyway, hope that these help. Cheers! — 856:Actually, how do you guys think just 7: 782:A bit of advice re; the lead. Copy 28: 1045:. (These are class articles =]) — 1170: 740: 712: 696:a reduction in the wikilinks to 614: 514: 125: 94: 1130:Progress As of November 26 2008 407:If you could get your hands on 409:Naval Weapons of World War Two 1: 1188:08:18, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1165:06:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1155:05:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1145:04:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 475:FYI, as evidenced on the USS 224:00:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 32:Tribal class destroyer (1936) 1208:05:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 1121:20:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC) 1112:tags down where I think you 1088:18:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC) 1067:17:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC) 1027:23:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 1002:06:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 988:00:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 954:01:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 903:23:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 881:18:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 852:22:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 831:21:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 822:03:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 807:10:37, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 773:07:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 758:02:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 730:02:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 664:07:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 632:01:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 608:00:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 532:02:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 509:15:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 471:15:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 363:05:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 330:05:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 316:05:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 283:05:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 267:04:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 204:00:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 190:03:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 163:tags where cites are needed. 143:02:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 112:02:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 80:03:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 48:04:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1223: 61:The lead is too short per 862:the fate of the class 790:is another good one. 367:Actually, unless you 812:See earlier comment 583:did it for me. =]) — 1043:class battlecruiser 1080: 1019: 895: 873: 844: 799: 1073: 1060:(Il Viquipedista) 1012: 888: 866: 837: 792: 684:can be challenged 657:(Il Viquipedista) 551:do what I did on 151:in-line citations 1214: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1111: 1105: 1079: 1076: 1063: 1056: 1051: 1036:class battleship 1018: 1015: 986: 977: 972: 929: 928: 924: 894: 891: 872: 869: 843: 840: 798: 795: 748: 744: 743: 720: 716: 715: 660: 653: 648: 622: 618: 617: 606: 597: 592: 571: 564: 558: 547:(outdent) Also, 522: 518: 517: 507: 498: 493: 469: 460: 455: 361: 352: 347: 314: 305: 300: 265: 256: 251: 242:tags...cheers! — 241: 235: 221: 219: 214: 162: 156: 133: 129: 128: 102: 98: 97: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1171: 1169: 1132: 1109: 1103: 1077: 1074: 1061: 1054: 1049: 1047: 1016: 1013: 983: 975: 967: 964: 930: 926: 922: 920: 919: 915:Progress As of 892: 889: 870: 867: 841: 838: 796: 793: 780: 741: 739: 713: 711: 672: 658: 651: 646: 644: 640:Global Security 615: 613: 603: 595: 587: 584: 569: 562: 556: 515: 513: 504: 496: 488: 485: 466: 458: 450: 447: 416:User:Trekphiler 358: 350: 342: 339: 311: 303: 295: 292: 262: 254: 246: 243: 239: 233: 217: 212: 210: 160: 154: 126: 124: 95: 93: 55: 35: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 1220: 1218: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1124: 1123: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1059: 981: 918: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 824: 779: 776: 766: 765: 762: 761: 760: 734: 733: 732: 694: 671: 668: 667: 666: 656: 635: 634: 601: 573: 572: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 502: 473: 464: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 419: 412: 405: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 376: 356: 309: 270: 269: 260: 229: 228: 227: 226: 192: 172: 171: 166:Is U-boat.net 164: 147: 146: 145: 119: 116: 115: 114: 83: 82: 67: 66: 54: 51: 34: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1219: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1200:ThePointblank 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180:ThePointblank 1177: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137:ThePointblank 1129: 1127: 1122: 1119: 1115: 1108: 1101: 1100: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1044: 1042: 1037: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1009: 1005: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 994:ThePointblank 991: 990: 989: 985: 984: 978: 976:for President 973: 971: 962: 958: 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 946:ThePointblank 943: 939: 935: 925: 917: 914: 904: 900: 896: 884: 883: 882: 878: 874: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 849: 845: 834: 833: 832: 829: 825: 823: 819: 815: 814:ThePointblank 811: 810: 809: 808: 804: 800: 789: 785: 777: 775: 774: 771: 763: 759: 755: 751: 750:ThePointblank 747: 738: 737: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722:ThePointblank 719: 710: 709: 707: 703: 699: 695: 692: 691: 690: 687: 685: 681: 676: 669: 665: 661: 659: 654: 649: 641: 637: 636: 633: 629: 625: 624:ThePointblank 621: 612: 611: 610: 609: 605: 604: 598: 596:for President 593: 591: 582: 578: 568: 567: 566: 561: 555:! When using 554: 550: 533: 529: 525: 524:ThePointblank 521: 512: 511: 510: 506: 505: 499: 497:for President 494: 492: 482: 478: 474: 472: 468: 467: 461: 459:for President 456: 454: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 423: 420: 417: 413: 410: 406: 403: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 377: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 360: 359: 353: 351:for President 348: 346: 337: 333: 332: 331: 327: 323: 322:ThePointblank 319: 318: 317: 313: 312: 306: 304:for President 301: 299: 290: 286: 285: 284: 280: 276: 275:ThePointblank 272: 271: 268: 264: 263: 257: 255:for President 252: 250: 238: 231: 230: 225: 222: 220: 215: 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 196:ThePointblank 193: 191: 187: 183: 182:ThePointblank 179: 174: 173: 169: 165: 159: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 135:ThePointblank 132: 123: 122: 120: 117: 113: 109: 105: 104:ThePointblank 101: 92: 91: 89: 85: 84: 81: 77: 73: 72:ThePointblank 69: 68: 64: 60: 59: 58: 52: 50: 49: 45: 41: 40:ThePointblank 33: 30: 23: 19: 1196: 1175: 1133: 1125: 1113: 1046: 1040: 1033: 979: 969: 941: 937: 933: 931: 861: 857: 787: 781: 767: 745: 717: 697: 688: 679: 677: 673: 643: 619: 599: 589: 576: 574: 552: 548: 546: 519: 500: 490: 480: 476: 462: 452: 408: 402:Google Books 372: 368: 354: 344: 335: 307: 297: 288: 258: 248: 209: 130: 99: 56: 36: 982:Vote for Ed 706:WP:OVERLINK 602:Vote for Ed 503:Vote for Ed 465:Vote for Ed 357:Vote for Ed 310:Vote for Ed 261:Vote for Ed 88:WP:MOSIMAGE 22:Peer review 702:WP:MOSDATE 680:everything 373:everything 1135:quality. 788:Survivors 642:too. :) — 287:Well, it 1162:saberwyn 1152:saberwyn 1118:saberwyn 942:Post-War 828:saberwyn 778:Ryan4314 770:saberwyn 670:Saberwyn 638:Oh, try 560:cite web 422:Conway's 414:Talk to 168:reliable 53:the_ed17 20:‎ | 581:Maralia 63:WP:LEAD 1114:really 1041:Alaska 961:endash 940:, and 921:": --> 698:really 553:Nevada 481:Nevada 477:Nevada 369:really 178:WP:RSN 577:every 549:don't 336:right 16:< 1204:talk 1184:talk 1176:Done 1141:talk 1107:fact 1084:talk 1078:4314 1075:Ryan 1038:and 1034:Iowa 1023:talk 1017:4314 1014:Ryan 1008:here 998:talk 950:talk 938:1944 934:1942 923:edit 899:talk 893:4314 890:Ryan 877:talk 871:4314 868:Ryan 858:Fate 848:talk 842:4314 839:Ryan 818:talk 803:talk 797:4314 794:Ryan 784:this 754:talk 746:Done 726:talk 718:Done 704:and 628:talk 620:Done 528:talk 520:Done 326:talk 279:talk 237:fact 200:talk 186:talk 158:fact 139:talk 131:Done 108:talk 100:Done 86:Per 76:talk 44:talk 965:Ed 864:". 585:Ed 486:Ed 448:Ed 340:Ed 293:Ed 289:has 244:Ed 1206:) 1186:) 1143:) 1110:}} 1104:{{ 1086:) 1065:— 1055:17 1050:Ed 1025:) 1000:) 952:) 936:, 901:) 879:) 850:) 820:) 805:) 756:) 728:) 708:) 662:— 652:17 647:Ed 630:) 563:}} 557:{{ 530:) 328:) 281:) 240:}} 234:{{ 218:17 213:Ed 202:) 188:) 161:}} 155:{{ 141:) 110:) 78:) 46:) 1202:( 1182:( 1139:( 1082:( 1021:( 996:( 970:7 968:1 948:( 927:] 897:( 875:( 846:( 816:( 801:( 752:( 724:( 626:( 590:7 588:1 526:( 491:7 489:1 484:— 453:7 451:1 345:7 343:1 324:( 298:7 296:1 277:( 249:7 247:1 198:( 184:( 170:? 137:( 106:( 74:( 42:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
Peer review
Tribal class destroyer (1936)
ThePointblank
talk
04:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
WP:LEAD
ThePointblank
talk
03:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
WP:MOSIMAGE
ThePointblank
talk
02:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
ThePointblank
talk
02:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
in-line citations
fact
reliable
WP:RSN
ThePointblank
talk
03:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
ThePointblank
talk
00:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Ed
17
00:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.