Knowledge

:WikiProject Palaeontology/Paleoart review/Archive 5 - Knowledge

Source 📝

648:
anything to do with waterproofing. Similarly, aerodynamics may have no or minimal influence here, but I do not know. When I examined the well-formed trouser feathers on a cockatoo years ago, I assumed that they were for heat insulation. When I looked at the photographs of the ibis genus on Commons, I also thought that they would be mainly for heat insulation. Knowing the human anatomy for heat circulation in the limbs (which is not covered well on the Wiki), I thought that evolution would not miss an opportunity to use the heat-exchange capacity of the bear skin of the lower limbs of ibises for heat auto-regulation. I guess that the proximal parts of the lower limb would necessarily be warmer and would benefit most from the heat insulation of trouser feathers in a cold invironment. I guess that the trouser feathers would help to support a temperature gradient along the tibial portion of a bird's leg, and so assist heat auto-regulation, both in cooling the bird when hot and minimising heat loss when cold.
209:
phalanx 1 of digit I, 330530; j . pedal phalanx 1 of digit II, 330529; j . pedal phalanx 1 of digit III, 330532; j . pedal phalanx 2 of digit III, 330533; j . pedal phalanx 1 of digit IV, 330535. Marais de l'Ermitage: Anterior part of mandible, 1872; 1. quadrate, 1913; sacrum, 1918; fragment of pelvis, r. side, 1912; 1. scapula, 1909; 1. p. humerus, 1908; r. p. ulna, 1806; ulna, s., 1910; p. radius, 1871; 3 d. radii, 1808, 1875, 1911; r. carpometacarpus, 1809; 3 r. d. tibiotarsi, 1804, 1805, 1807; 1. tibiotarsus, 1867; 1. d. tibiotarsus, 1868; r. and 1. tarsometatarsi, same individual, 1801, 1803; r. j . tarsometatarsus, 1870; 1. tarsometatarsus, 1802; 1. j . tarsometatarsus, 1869; 2 pedal phalanges 1 of digit II, 1873, 1874.
723: 1468: 1665: 1628:
period. I like how you have indicated partially bare temples! With a lack of an Harderian gland, the fur would perhaps look unkempt and somewhat bristly. Like modern rodents and opossums the tail and feet would have been scaly in addition to having sparse hair. It think visible scales would look cool too, emphasising the transitional nature of the critter. It may have had copious whiskers, with sensory hairs on the shoulders, feet and other places.
1370: 3436: 1289: 3422: 4226: 3862: 1820:
sizes started with the parts associated with smell. The rest of the brain followed later. We can thus fairly safely say that the nose were extremely important in early mammals. Being small insectivores, they likely used their nose much like small mammalian insectivores still do, nosing around in the undergrowth to find small prey. If so, a naked nose without either hair or scales seem a fair guess.
319: 618:
This would be bad for feathers and would lead to a lot of heat loss and could be lethal on a cold night especially when food is in short supply. Body feathers are seamless with leg feathers giving the appearance of well-formed trousers and keep water and cold out. These are guesses. What else could they be for? Also, evolution is driven by overall average success as well and fatalities.
1907: 1957: 3254:
It provides no such information, but that is only because it can't, just like your paper, which I think oversteps what it should do: inference with no basis. The fossils and papers leave two possible choices, choosing one for this is not original research. As for tyrannosaur fingers, as I said, it is
2966:
the clade that you point to has been somewhat arbitrarily selected by one author as where spurs first appeared. That is pretty far from some random cynodont, I'd say. Furthermore, I just showed you a paper that does not rule moganucodonts out of having spurs at all, but if it hadn't been possible and
1805:
The wiskers are good, the drawing (at least to me) seem to indicate the hairline of the fur stop right at the rhinarium. We do not really know where the critter had fur. Comparing to extant mammals of the same size, the feet would be hairless (even more than in your reconstruction), the tail would at
759:
I think you're the one who is misunderstanding. As you can see on the image on the right, the feathers do not even reach the ankle/tibio-tarsal articulation. And the drawing has the "pants" even closer to this joint than the extant species. The tibiae are also drawn somewhat short, perhaps this is an
199:
I will fix those issues, and if you look at the image there, I've shortened the legs below the ankle (not the knee, but I'm sure you are aware). As for leg morphology, not much is known, and modern restorations vary a lot. Hume restores the legs very short and thick, whereas a restoration from Probst
118:
It is standing, not walking, so the bend isn't as evident as in those photos, but it should be clear that the ankle is directed backwards, and that the lower leg continues forwards, in a bend. As for leg robustness, you should remember the turkey comparison, which we have discussed at length, I guess
3152:
against the spur, just an arbitrary choice by the author, and your own persistence. I've showed you a paper with a different conclusion (which is that there is no evidence for either). This discussion is one sided and "going nowhere" because you ignore the paper I linked to. Take also the example of
2918:
There's an important issue here as to how Knowledge's emphasis on verifiability applies to paleontological reconstructions. Nothing in the standards at the head of this page prohibits introducing features for which there is no evidence for or against, even features that are obviously maladaptive. In
2211:
condition may be what we see in echidnas, in which case it may represent the primitive mammalian condition, and pinnae only evolving after the formation of the middle ear as Smokey suggested. I'm not sure though, echidnas are really strange. Perhaps the "C" figure could be something to go by? "D" is
1891:
Honestly, I don't have any good answers for you. Shrews use high frequency sounds, yet they have very small pinnae. The otherwise very similar marsupial mice have large pinnae. Monitremes have next to nothing, then again they are all very specialised. The small ones you have given it looks OK to me,
1627:
it did have fur, then it would be one layer only (no wolly under-fur and covering guard-hairs) like on shrews and opossums. The fur would likely also be short like you have drawn, but lacking from tail too, in addition the feet and possibly the snout, this being a tropical critter from a fairly warm
296:
I think it looks better with some trouser feathers. You have a look at some more ibis trouser feathers on Commons and see what you think. Cockatoos have flat (not fluffy) feathers surrounding the upper legs. In cockatoos it looks to me like the trouser feathers keep the legs warm. In the last image,
78:
I agree, the limbs are are quite robust compared to living species, but Hume restores them even more so in one of his images. As for webbing, Dubois considered them land birds, and their habitat was forests, there is some discussion of this in the article. Modern restorations show the toes unwebbed,
3005:
strengthen the standards to exclude this case? Perhaps you have another proposal, but the answer seems obvious to me: a prominent feature in the artistic reconstruction of an animal makes a claim that the animal had the feature in question and, just as Knowledge policy requires that such a claim in
2480:
The diagram to which I tried to direct Petter shows the ectotympanic beneath the center of the mandible, so that's where a tympanum would have to be, and any pinnae would need to be close by. An animal with pinnae under the chin would look rather odd, but that would be the logical place to put them
1819:
Of course, we can't be sure just how hairless the nose was, but hairlessness in the groups I mention is an aid in making the nose sensitive both to smell and touch. We know from some CT-scan work that the initial growth in the mammalian brain from the smallish reptilian size to the larger mammalian
1031:
Why is it written above in the examples that the representation of herbaceous plants with triassic / jurassic animals banned? ("Example: Dinosaurs from the Triassic or Jurassic depicted walking on grass, which did not exist at that time.") These existed at least since the Devonian. And thousands of
632:
I've not "missed" the point, I'm just raising another point, which is that if relatives that actually live in wetlands don't have it, and if such a feature is also found in other birds where it is unrelated to rain, I don't see what it would have to do with rain in the first place. Especially since
617:
I think that your reply would tend to show that you have missed the point. I think that the key feature of the trouser feathers is that they prevent water going upwards between the leg and the body feathers. Getting water between main body feathers would be much more serious, than getting legs wet.
3324:
The third finger in tyrannosaurs is the exact same issue. They don't randomly appear or reappear, it has to do with phylogenetic placement. Basal tyrannosaurs have three, derived ones don't. But for taxa in between with no preserved hands, we have no way of knowing. Just like here. If there was an
1852:
and other early mammaliaforms? I think I read somewhere that pinnae are only useful for amplifying high-frequency sounds, but cynodonts/mammaliaforms weren't able to hear at high frequencies because their middle ear bones were still associated with supporting the jaw and therefore not very good at
1120:
Those are very "grassy" colours. The problem with the picture is that the vegetation seem a monoculture, which is what you find in some modern day grassy prairies. I am not a palaeobotanist, but I think the monospecies plains is a Neogene phenomenon. If the image is adjustable, I would fiddle with
1066:
It doesn't say all herbaceous plants, just grasses (which first appeared at the very end of the Cretaceous). I don't know a ton about plants, but ferns were common during the Triassic/Jurassic and their root systems have probably been preserved in sediments. The same goes for other common Mesozoic
488:
trouser feathers grow out of the top of the leg and surround the top of the leg and are directed downwards to look closely applied to the legs. From a distance the "trousers" can look almost seamless. I do not know where the trouser feather grow from in an ibis; however looking at this image again
3888:
rationale is that it is redundant, since it is so similar to the living species? I personally don't see why it hurts, though, the taxobox is empty anyway. Maybe it would be better with a clearer sense of scale, so it isn't just identifiable as that species (and not a normal fossa) by the caption.
487:
I think that the new illustration looks a lot better with some trouser feathers. If it helps, the "trouser" feathers on a cockatoo are not fluffy. Think of little feathers, which are as well formed as wing feathers, that are closely applied to the top of the legs. Also, on a cockatoo, some of the
2429:
should be represented with pinnae, that a pinna is compatible with an uncoiled cochlea, please take a look at the position of its ectotympanic in Figure 2.2a of the Manley & Sienknecht paper when thinking about where to put them. A pinna would have to be close to the tympanum, which would be
647:
I have had some time to take my bearings and focus on the issue. Please excuse my sloppy language earlier calling the visible joint a "knee". You might be correct that the trouser feathers have no or minimal effect on waterproofing and that the main drivers for their evolution may not have been
208:
MATERIAL.—Grotte des Premiers Francais: r. d. j . tarsometatarsus, 1993-37. Grotte de l'Autel: r. coracoid, 330510; 1. p. coracoid, 330527; r. carpometacarpus 330511; r. d. j . tibiotarsus, 330513; r. j . tarsometatarsus, 330512; r. d. j . tarsometatarsus, 330514; metatarsal I, 330536; j . pedal
3887:
Judged on the reason for removal, it wasn't removed for being specifically wrong: "revert image: sources for the art aren't clear, and this species was basically a larger version of its living relative, which is already depicted -- please discuss on talk page before adding again" I guess the
1760:
It is a very nice illustration. I think the fur looks good, and I like the small spur! The only thing I'm not too sure about is the shape of the snout. It seems a bit broad, almost rodent-like, and Morgie was by all accounts more shrew-like. Yet it was not a shrew (despite me putting in the
3044:
If you have some other way of strengthening the standards, please explain. To me, there is very little difference between exhibiting a prominent feature in paleoart and claiming, in text, that the feature was present. The verification policy should apply in either
492:, I would be surprised if there were no feathers growing from the top of its legs. In summary, I guess there is no anatomical reason why you should not extend the trouser feathers downward a little, so that they are a bit longer without being particularly fluffy. 402:
genus? I guess bear skin on the Reunion Ibis would have been black, going on extant species of its genus, but I do not know how extensive the bare skin would have been. Was the bear skin confined to a small rim of bear skin around the eyes or was it a large area?
2116:
but unlike the echinas, antedating the migration of the angular and articular into the cranium. I suggest that this diagram, not information on echidnas, be used in placing Morganucodon's ear unless, as Petter suggests, the problem is avoided by hiding the ear.
2342:. These authors' view is that pinnae (external ears) did not develop until the Cretaceous, after the divergence of the monotremes from the therian lineage. Thus, pinnae were not secondarily lost in Monotremata; no monotreme ancestor had pinnae, and neither did 181:. The image still looks like it will fall forward. Feathers on the tail may present a visual mass, but they are not very heavy. Are the position of the "knees" based on any measurements? The ibis could run fast. Would it need lower knees? see the road runner 571:
contact with water than birds that habitually live in low wetlands (like regular ibises do), regardless of how much it rained. And my point was, that not even the latter have much feathering on the lower legs, though they should have, following that logic.
3213:
is unknown. I believe it's phylogenetic position right now is close to the sister group of two-fingered tyrannosauroids, so whether it had two or three fingers is not knowable without further fossil finds or a refinement of its phylogenetic position.
840:
Would there be safe grounds for illustrating it gliding down from where it could have climbed up to, perhaps from a rocky structure. It seems that a lot of wing sub-fossils are available. The illustration might be useful to show its wings.
3676:
I can't find skeletal restorations of either to compare with, but I see you've made a skeletal yourself, based on the fossils, so I guess if those are accurate, this image will be too. And yup, feel free to create such missing articles!
2882:
It simply says "Presence of the extratarsal spur in morganucodontans (Jenkins and Parring−ton 1976) has not been demonstrated as yet since the tarsals are incompletely known in this group." Seems a bit arbitrary to draw the line there.
333:
I have no idea where he gets that red head from, though, not mentioned by any contemporaries. As for "my" image, I've now made the pants less fluffy, and more even, like the Australian congener. The legs are a bit more slender also.
4308:
Probably way to late, but with the hindfoot up in the air, and one of the front feet poking below the one sitting flat to the imaginary surface, the whole skeleton looks out of balance. Could the most forward foot be raised a bit?
2520:(Indiana University Press, 2013), p. 218. In her view, the spur was acquired after the Morganucodonta branched off but prior to the appearance of the Docodonta. Following her cladogram and using boldface for groups with the spur: 1678:
Interesting, I never knew about the Harderian glands! (Also thanks for the link, I could never get my hands on Kemp's book). As for the head, I intended it to be tilted a bit as if the animal were looking up or down at something.
1208:
Cool! In relation to Rutiodon, it appears the head and neck is a bit too big and long? And I'm not sure, but I don't think I've seen a crocodile with the tail bent that much so close to the base? Usually the "line" is smoother.
297:
I think that the centre of gravity is above the front of the foot, so it looks balanced. I would guess that the bird was not very heavy, if it could fly a little, so would it need very study legs? Would a bustard be equivalent?
3558:
Hmm, that diagram is completely hypothetical, made before soft tissue was published. The only actual tail outline available shows asymmetrical lobes, with the lower one being larger. That of course doesn't rule out that there
859:
Well, there isn't enough wing material to show it properly, and we have no idea how the wing feathers looked like, so I think it would be too much guesswork. The current folded wings are much safer, when it comes to accuracy.
1976:
Echidnas? A pinna is only useful if it's near a tympanum, which would have to be mandibular prior to the migration of the articular/malleus into the cranium. Isn't the echidna's tympanum cranial? If so, it's a poor model for
1522:
Ouch, sorry I did not catch the insectivorous bit. As an insectivore it has too big belly (the first version were better in that regard). I am a bit confused over the heavy legs. It must have been a very unusual insectivore.
55:
It has a professional and presentable look about it. I think that the "knees" look too high and perhaps the legs and toes look too broad, but I have not measured the sub-fossils. Perhaps slight webbing between toes? see
447:
I guess that you would need to think about a 17th century turkey, because subsequent domestication is likely to have modified the turkey a lot. It might be best to consider wild turkeys or old illustrations of turkeys.
600:
I haven't heard of such, at least. It seems kind of illogical to keep rain away from the top of the legs only. And rain doesn't seem to have much evolutionary pressure, being irregular and non-lethal most of the time.
1496:
herbivorous but insectivorous based on its dentition (small pointed teeth in the jaws and on the palate). Do you think I should re-shrink the belly, or would the size shown now still be reasonable for an insectivore?
676:
I think that you have probably misunderstood something, because the tibial portion of a birds leg is above the tibio-tarsal articulation and all the extant ibises have trouser feathers on that part of the leg. See
538:
Well, the sources specifically state its habitat was not wetlands, so it is atypical for an ibis in that way. And even regular ibises, that do live inwetlands, do not have feathers that extend far down the legs.
489: 178: 3159:. Its position makes it possible that it could have either two or three fingers on each hand. But because the forelimbs are unknown, the choice is arbitrary. It has been depicted in both ways by professionals. 3255:
very relevant, Appalachiosaurus has recently been restored with both large three fingered hand,s as well as small, two fingered hands, again based on nothing but phylogenetics and lack of complete fossils.
967:
It is similar for the African Scared Ibis juveniles which have more feathers on the neck than the adults - there are some images of them on Commons. It did not know it applied to the Malagasy Sacred Ibis.
1769:. If you want to change anything about the critter, I would suggest trying to see if could prolong the soft part of the nose a bit, and perhaps make it hairless, like the shrew and many small marsupials. 2179:
Did you see figure 3.7? I couldn't figure how to make Google books open at the right page. I think the ear on your illustration may sit a bit high, and it may perhaps not have had such a pointy tip.
1402:
The paper says it was a herbivore. I think it would have had a somewhat larger belly to hold the guts necessary to digest plants. All herbivores, even skinny ones like antelopes, have roomy bellies.
2069:
A possible solution could be to put some more fur there, obscuring the pinnae/ear slits. Smaller shrews mostly have their ears obscured by fur, there's no reason the same could not be the case in
61: 1806:
best have very sparse hairs combined with rodent/oppossum-type of scales, and the snout would likely have very short hairs or more likely be completely naked as in the Asian house shrew or a
1121:
the colour a bit (darker green) and ad a bit of other obvious growth. If you look at the two plant pictures I linked to, you will see some examples of the "not quite grass" grass lookalikes.
804:
Apparently, it rains a lot in Reunion, but I do not know how this would have affected the evolution of its feathers. I suspect that an element of waterproofing would be involved somewhere.
1928:
That is a great improvement! The nose is perfect! I like the hint of scales on the tail, very neat! I would perhaps consider having the skin a tad lighter, to emphasize the hairless snout.
57: 1868: 1008:
Well, no one knows the exact size, since the fossils are so scrappy. I have seen no modern source that even attempts to make a size estimate, so I think it would be too speculative.
3306:
is not a major new structure; some basal tyrannosauroids had them and some didn't. The extratarsal spur is a major new structure and should be associated with an organisms like
2919:
a reconstruction depicted in an encyclopedia, though, the reader can be expected to think that there is evidence for any prominent feature shown. Putting an extratarsal spur on
1465:. I think the belly might have been even more pronounced, not necessarily bigger, but differently distributed. I may be off though, early archosauromorph were strange critters. 4147:, and the bones of the tail and the ribs, although the tail is more horizontal; the form of the bones in the coracoid, limbs, neck, back and hips are from the new skeleton of 21: 1089:) and clubmosses, which at a distance can look quite grassy. Particularly small, herbaceous horsetails and efedras filled the ecological niche today occupied by grasses. 3914:
lacks a nose horn, and has a "swelling" there, like all other basal (= non-pachyrhinosaurin, non-centrosaurin) centrosaurines. According to this recent (but not formal)
1226:
I've straightened out and lengthened the tail a bit. My original reasoning behind the bendy tail was that phytosaurs seem to have thinner tails than crocodilians (see
2165:
Thanks, you're right about making the snout lighter, will also match the other naked areas better. I think I'll just shrink the ear a bit? Is in the right position?
990:
Does the illustration need the size of the bird included in the image description on Commons? Dubois said the ibis was a big as a big goose. How big is a big goose?
3453:
This means that practically all our mosasaur restorations are now incorrect. So anyone up to fixing them with me? Our only accurate restoration can be found in the
2055:
My point is that the feature is uncertain in Morganucodon, so therefore the condition in echidnas is not necessarily what determines how the restoration should be.
3168: 2872: 662:
Well, again, that's where we need to look at close relatives for answers. No ibis has feathers extending that far down. Even what I've drawn is stretching it.
939: 330:
What to do with the turkey comparison then? Would imply legs that are more robust than those of an ibis, no? Julian Hume's version has very short, thick legs:
2361:
Manley, G. A.; Sienknecht, U. J. (2013). "The evolution and development of middle ears in land vertebrates". In Puria, S.; Fay, R. R.; Popper, A. N. (eds.).
3661:
and the skull of animal. I'm aware that this Knowledge don't have an article of this genus, but I can translate from the Spanish version. Any thoughts? --
2320:. I'll be in a university library in a week or so and will see what I can find. Perhaps others with better access can do the literature research earlier? 1913:
I have made the hands, feet and tail less hairy, made the snout longer and narrower, and less hairy. Is it ok (may not show up yet because of the cache)?
1104: 1051: 3232:
There certainly are areas in which an artist has to make an arbitrary choice: fur color, for example. In an encyclopedia, however, I feel strongly that
3179:
been recently reconstructed with three clawed fingers on each hand? I thought that it was now agreed that all tyrannosauroid theropods had two fingers.
3302:
Encyclopedias have a duty to be conservative, not associating major new structures with organisms unless there are reliable sources. A third finger on
3236:
features like that spur should be included only when there is a reliable source that affirms their presence. The paper to which you linked, which I am
2481:
if they're included at all. I prefer the view of Manley & Sienknecht, that pinnae didn't develop until the Cretaceous and were therefore absent in
2286:
An external ear (if any) has to be near an eardrum, which in turn needs to be associated with the reflected lamina of the angular bone, a jaw bone in
1772:
I must say I am extremely thankful for guys like the two of you taking the time to make all these wonderful illustrations of obscure extinct animals!
1721:
Amazing! The scaling is really beautifully done! This is possibly one of the best and most believable depiction of a near-mammal synapsid I've seen!
1953: 4145: 4033:
Yes, are photos, but in fact is only a osteoderm, but in ventral and dorsal views. There are from this article: Busbey, A. (1986). New material of
3507:
Fixed some more, can be seen among my uploaded files. The rest are harder to fix, since they have other inaccuracies as well or have backgrounds.
1137:
I tried, is a bit complicated, didn't look good. Who knows, maybe older grass will be discovered one day.Until then, it could be "proto-grass"...
238:
Well, the point is, nothing of the leg is known above the feet, so there's not much we can do, other than basing it on previous reconstructions.
1645:
I updated a while back, Petter? I'm pretty sure it's an improvement over the first version I made, but maybe it is too modern mammal like too?
1807: 1600: 3310:
for which reliable sources are available and with others for which phylogenetic bracketing is available, not with any organism more basal.
3955:
Fossils have been discovered with an extratarsal spur, probably homologous to the spur of the male platypus. Such a spur should appear in
253: 17: 2464:
Since this isn't up for GA or FA or something like that, I don't think it's such a pressing issue at present, so I'm ok with waiting.
2411:
Interesting. When I make this change (could Petter endorse?), it'll be the only earless depiction of Morganucodon I have ever seen.
2377: 3006:
the article text be verifiable, so a source must be available (though not necessarily provided) when the claim is made in paleoart.
1558: 722: 1590:
I agree with FM. Also, the head does not seem to be at quite the same angle as the body, but it could be twisting it's neck a bit.
553:
I did not mention wetlands. I said "walked over wet vegetation". Vegetation becomes wet when it rains. It rains a lot of Reunion.
469:. There is a difference between the two turkey species, of course, but it is the North American one that is mentioned, I imagine. 252:
And reading contemporaneous accounts. I see the problem. Some ducks run fast too. This type of duck with short legs can run fast:
3872:, it has been made by a project in the Catalonian wikipedia, but here has been reverted. Could be used or it must be modified?-- 2212:
obviously full pinnae. I have tried to get my hands on the article th efigure is adapted from, but haven't had any luck so far.
1339: 1245: 4444: 4430: 4416: 4398: 4384: 4375:
Cool, though it would look better if you gave a little more space for the elements that almost touch the borders of the image!
4370: 4347: 4333: 4318: 4290: 4276: 4262: 4248: 4213: 4199: 4185: 4168: 4120: 4106: 4092: 4078: 4064: 4050: 4028: 4013: 3983: 3968: 3942: 3933:
Fixed both (along with other issues). Seems we have to remove the photo, though (or move it to a section discussing the horn).
3927: 3897: 3881: 3844: 3827: 3810: 3795: 3759: 3745: 3727: 3713: 3686: 3670: 3634: 3620: 3605: 3572: 3553: 3530: 3516: 3500: 3484: 3466: 3448: 3408: 3394: 3376: 3334: 3319: 3264: 3249: 3223: 3188: 3128: 2976: 2949: 2892: 2494: 2473: 2459: 2439: 2420: 2355: 2329: 2277: 2249: 2235: 2221: 2202: 2188: 2174: 2142: 2126: 2082: 2064: 2048: 2030: 2016: 1990: 1969: 1937: 1922: 1901: 1862: 1843: 1829: 1796: 1781: 1730: 1716: 1702: 1688: 1654: 1637: 1585: 1570: 1532: 1506: 1483: 1456: 1442: 1428: 1411: 1396: 1350: 1333: 1319: 1304: 1271: 1257: 1241: 1218: 1202: 1146: 1130: 1115: 1098: 1081:
There where lots of small plants in the Mesozoic that would look like grass, without being grass. Examples include horsetails (
1076: 1061: 1041: 1017: 999: 977: 954: 923: 909: 887: 869: 850: 831: 813: 769: 690: 671: 657: 642: 627: 610: 595: 581: 562: 548: 533: 519: 501: 478: 457: 438: 412: 381: 363: 343: 310: 287: 265: 247: 233: 218: 194: 182: 172: 144: 128: 110: 88: 73: 50: 3596:
is more closely related to extant monotremes, which do not have these structures, than to therian mammals, many of which do.
2997:
only to make the point that the standards at the top of this page are inadequate. Surely you agree that extratarsal spurs in
1185: 1183: 1181: 1179: 633:
no published sources seem to propose rain has been an important factor in shaping the plumage of any bird that I know of.
1615:
was a very small animal and the closets known relative of mammals, so in my mind at least fur is not out of the question.
1295:
Here is Eurazhdarcho, the "small" romanian pterosaur (I drew the frog for size reference). Is this restoration accurate?
1329: 1300: 94: 3833: 1642:
On this note (and I don't mean to hijack this section or anythig), do you have any comments on this Morganucodon image
4314: 4004:. The idea is that it will be part of a future expansion of the article (currently in process). What do you think? -- 2446:@ FunkMonk: Petter seems to be on Wikibreak (no contributions for two weeks). Do you suggest looking elsewhere for a 2245: 2217: 2184: 2078: 1965: 1933: 1897: 1825: 1777: 1726: 1698: 1633: 1528: 1479: 1407: 1126: 1094: 1032:
small palaeoroots of such herbaceous plants are to be found in a lot of continental jurassic sediments, for example.
510:
Below the joint? Again, I think it's best to base it on relatives, and in those the pants stop well above the joint.
3383: 467: 2387: 1576:
Looks nice. But if the legs are sprawled, I'm not sure the right hind leg would be visible at all from that angle?
524:
Not below the joint. I guess, enough to keep water out when it walked over wet vegetation and for heat insulation.
298: 3801:
Hmm, since this is a whale, the tail seems quite wrong, the tail fluke seems to be oriented as if it was a shark?
938:
specimens apparently do not have entirely naked heads, but feathers in almost the same arrangement as I've drawn:
3918:, it seems like now it's actually based on known skeletal elements. Shouldn't we delete/modify its restorations? 3964: 3630: 3601: 3589: 3541:
have the same type of caudal fin? I thought that it varies between the mosasaur subfamilies, like is show here:
3427: 3315: 3245: 3184: 3124: 2945: 2868: 2490: 2455: 2435: 2351: 2325: 2122: 2044: 2012: 1986: 1554: 1085:
to the degree that only the shade of green indicate it isn't "regular grass" to the casual observer), efedras (
3023:
If the standards are strengthened in the manner I propose, however, extratarsal spurs must not be depicted on
2073:, particularly as it presumably was a burrowing animal. The hair would stop debris from clogging up the ears. 3815:
Furthermore, judged on the wildly differing style of his other uploads, I'd say it is a copyright violation:
2021:
I think it's a bit too uncertain and hypothetical for this particular taxon to say anything that definitive.
2447: 1325: 1296: 372:
I'll go as far within the reasonable, based on closely related species, sources and published restorations.
3451: 4310: 3832:
Oh, I forget the tail. Anyway, the image certainly is a copyright violation; the original author is here:
2241: 2213: 2180: 2074: 1961: 1929: 1893: 1821: 1773: 1722: 1694: 1629: 1524: 1475: 1403: 1122: 1090: 995: 973: 919: 883: 846: 809: 686: 653: 623: 591: 558: 529: 497: 453: 429:. No modern restorations give it an entirely naked head, probably because no old accounts mentioned this. 408: 359: 306: 261: 229: 190: 106: 69: 3285:
I noted that it was beside the point. Matt's rebuttal is quite sufficient; no corroboration is necessary.
2339: 1875:; perhaps it could hear over 10 kHz, which would be sufficient to give pinnae some use. Asian elephants ( 1236:), but they probably still had big caudofemoralis muscles like living crocodilians. The head and neck of 101:. Also, legs should be under centre of gravity. In your first image it looks like it will fall forwards. 2998: 2924: 2902: 2856: 1467: 301:. I am trying to think of birds that are equivalent. I do not know enough about it. I am only guessing. 354:
None of the following is important, but I wonder how far you might want to go with your illustrations:
3956: 3475:
I've only made the outline, not made it match the texture yet, will do when the outline is approved.
3100: 1384: 935: 200:& Brial 2002 shows the legs very slender. Here is a list of the known elements from a 1999 paper: 177:
What about some "trouser" feathers, feathers around the top of the legs. Parrots have these too, see
3400: 3368: 2909:
had such a spur. But how can such a hypothesis even be supported at this point? What's the evidence?
1854: 1787:
Thanks, when you say hairless, do you mean that there are hair on incorrect places of the nose now?
1708: 1680: 1562: 1498: 1448: 1420: 1388: 1249: 1194: 1068: 822:
But how would that affect it visually? It's not a penguin or some such, so my guess is very little.
4403:
Done; I can upload the image (by the way, is there enough space for the skeleton in the article of
4338:
Ok, the new version has been uploaded; I hope that the new posture of the limbs be more accurate.--
3960: 3626: 3597: 3404: 3372: 3311: 3241: 3180: 3120: 2941: 2864: 2486: 2451: 2431: 2347: 2321: 2240:
It looks great, a major improvement over the original drawing! To my eyes, this one look the part!
2118: 2040: 2008: 1982: 1858: 1712: 1684: 1566: 1502: 1452: 1424: 1392: 1253: 1198: 1072: 586:
I am not sure if length of trousers is related to their effectiveness in keeping water out or not.
4359: 41:, any thoughts? Based on the fossils, modern restorations, and modern species. Could be coloured. 4426: 4380: 4272: 4244: 4195: 4116: 4088: 4060: 4024: 3979: 3938: 3893: 3823: 3806: 3755: 3723: 3682: 3653: 3616: 3568: 3526: 3512: 3496: 3480: 3462: 3390: 3330: 3260: 3219: 3164: 2972: 2888: 2469: 2416: 2273: 2231: 2198: 2170: 2138: 2060: 2026: 1918: 1839: 1792: 1650: 1581: 1461:
Bacground is nice! It has an awfully short body compared to a modern herbivorous reptile like an
1438: 1346: 1315: 1267: 1214: 1142: 1111: 1057: 1013: 950: 905: 865: 827: 765: 667: 638: 606: 577: 544: 515: 474: 434: 377: 339: 283: 243: 214: 168: 140: 124: 84: 46: 3919: 3915: 2338:
to anyone interested in the evolution of ears. Those with appropriate access rights can read it
79:
and I believe that is the reason. I await your reply on those issues, but I will fix the knees.
3592:
exhibits external ears. The absence of these non-skeletal elements is implied by the fact that
3365: 1956:. Reduced? Primitive? The only relevant thing I could find is Vaughan, Ryan & Czaplewski's 1664: 1086: 331: 4440: 4412: 4394: 4366: 4343: 4329: 4286: 4258: 4209: 4181: 4164: 4102: 4074: 4046: 4009: 3877: 3840: 3791: 3741: 3709: 3666: 3549: 3193:
Not sure where you got that idea, but plenty of basal tyrannosauroids had three digits, incl.
3140:
As this discussion seems to be going nowhere in this forum, I am continuing the discussion at
2878:
But how can such a hypothesis even be supported at this point? What's the evidence? See also:
2374: 2207:
Aren't they? Those scales are a bit overdone I'd say. But the ear is interesting. I think the
1762: 1262:
I think it looks much more natural now. The smoother curve seems to balance the head as well.
1037: 991: 969: 915: 897: 879: 842: 805: 682: 649: 619: 587: 554: 525: 493: 449: 404: 355: 302: 257: 225: 186: 102: 65: 3155: 3027:
until such time as the fossil record provides the relevant evidence. Currently, it does not.
2366: 1082: 878:
In your drawing, what is the evidence for the ruff of feathers on its chest below its neck?
4140:, but adding all the teeth; the proportions and the position of the bones are based in the 4138: 3435: 1369: 567:
Well, I think its safe to say that a bird that lived in mountainous forests on RĂŠunion had
3923: 3421: 2400: 2305: 2105: 1608: 1288: 1168: 391: 4239:
Cool, I think black outline would make it much clearer, though, is it too late for that?
4002: 1324:
I've elongated the finger. However, aren't azhdarchid wing fingers usually very short? --
31: 1611:, usually thought a pre-requite for a proper mammalian-style pelage. In the other hand, 93:
Dubois says it has feet like a Turkey. See these turkeys which has slightly webbed feet;
4083:
Yup, and in general, never base anything too closely on something that is copyrighted!
3141: 2450:
or shall we wait? We do want someone with access to the Manley & Sienknecht paper.
2226:
How about the new version? Now the snout is lighter, and the ear is lower and rounder.
1539: 3861: 3816: 466:
I don't think domesticated turkeys are that different from wild ones. See this article
98: 4422: 4376: 4268: 4240: 4191: 4112: 4084: 4056: 4020: 3975: 3934: 3889: 3819: 3802: 3751: 3719: 3678: 3612: 3564: 3522: 3508: 3492: 3476: 3458: 3386: 3350: 3326: 3256: 3215: 3160: 2968: 2884: 2465: 2412: 2269: 2227: 2194: 2166: 2134: 2056: 2039:, not the echidna family. But which of my claims do you regard as overly definitive? 2022: 1914: 1835: 1788: 1646: 1577: 1434: 1342: 1311: 1263: 1232: 1210: 1138: 1107: 1053: 1009: 946: 901: 861: 823: 761: 663: 634: 602: 573: 540: 511: 470: 430: 390:
What is known about the feather covering on the head and neck and any bare skin? The
373: 335: 279: 239: 210: 164: 136: 120: 80: 42: 3521:
It even seems the Platecarpus image is incorrect now, the upper fin is too large...
2879: 4436: 4408: 4390: 4362: 4339: 4325: 4282: 4254: 4225: 4205: 4177: 4160: 4098: 4070: 4042: 4005: 3873: 3836: 3787: 3737: 3733: 3705: 3694:, as far I known, is the only leontiinid with a complete skeleton. To compare with 3662: 3582: 3545: 3447:
A 2010 paper indicated that mosasaurs had bilobed tail fins and rather rigid bodies
1750: 1282: 1240:
are pretty big, about the same length as the trunk in some complete skeletons (see
1033: 678: 422: 3699: 3325:
actual argument involved here, I could follow you, but you haven't presented one.
4037:(Crocodylia: Sebecosuchidae) from the Miocene of La Venta Formation of Colombia. 3542: 3001:
would be inappropriate, though nothing in the standards excludes them. How would
2295: 2095: 1996: 1227: 3869: 3782: 3454: 2923:
contravenes that expectation. Would it be proper to show an extratarsal spur in
2370: 2300: 2100: 1766: 318: 4111:
Looks good, in any case. What is the body and the rest of the skull based on?
3998: 3657: 426: 4069:
You right, so I can remove it or make a linear drawing of the osteoderm... --
3062:
The choice of Docodonta as the most basal clade represented with the spur is
1834:
Ok, thanks, I'll try to have an updated version here for review before soon.
1599:
The pelage is a feature that need careful consideration. According to Kemp's
3472:
Here's a modification I made of a PD image on Commons, does it look alright?
2313: 1362: 1175:
It's been a very long while since I've drawn something, so here's something.
2268:
Peter Brown, you mentioned a different ear placement. Where would that be?
2193:
Ah, didn't see that. And wow, those are some heavy scales on Thrinaxodon!
1906: 1765:
for comparison in the article). The best reconstruction I have found is a
3148:
Lol, why? I think you're taking this too far, and I don't really see any
3070:
skeleton is available with the spur, and phylogenetic bracketing between
1189: 942: 2094:
the ear is shown, it has to be in the jaw so as to be near the eardrum.
1187:) and the proportions of the rest of the body are based on skeletons of 421:
Only affiliations that have been proposed are mentioned in the article,
4421:
Seems to be plenty of space somewhere under history or classification.
1643: 1547: 1224: 1176: 1050:
Don't know much about plants myself, but grass was brough up here too.
134: 116: 39: 4055:
The skeletal should be alright, but we can't use copyrighted photos!
3473: 3358: 2035:
Sorry, what is your point? I presume that "this particular taxon" is
1417: 1377: 277: 161: 3082:
Such evidence is entirely lacking in the case of the Morganucodonta.
2927:? No, because only the skull is known. Similar reasoning applies to 1867:
No, nonmammalian cynodonts had no use for pinnae; see my discussion
4097:
I'll have in account, in any case I've not upload the image yet. --
490:
File:Black-headed Ibis (Threskiornis melanocephalus) W IMG 1431.jpg
179:
File:Black-headed Ibis (Threskiornis melanocephalus) W IMG 1431.jpg
4224: 3860: 3817:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/Special:ListFiles/Strongilocentrotus
3434: 3420: 1905: 1663: 1488:
Thanks! I read more of the paper and it turns out the author says
1466: 1368: 1287: 941:
It seems these feathers disappear with age. So perhaps this was a
721: 317: 3078:
provides evidence that all other Docodonts had the spur as well.
2298:
Figure 3A on p. 436, reconstructs the position of the eardrum in
1995:
Also, echidnas don't have pinnae, just long slits behind the eyes
945:
trait in the RĂŠunion bird, since no sources mention naked heads.
133:
I just saw your reply, and added web and moved the legs forward:
4324:
Sure, I'll upload a new version. And thanks for the comment.--
4253:
I've uploaded a version with sharper lines, it looks better?--
2863:. Unless there is a competing source, it ought to be removed. 4174: 3910:
It has been implied by phylogeny for quit some time now that
3702: 3655:, a leontiinid notoungulate, mostly based in the skeleton of 3450:, and the former point has now been confirmed by soft tissue. 1757:
I thought it best to make a new entry for FunkMunk's Morgie.
398:
genus. Has anyone suggested that the Reunion Ibis was in the
3611:
Heh, I fixed it earlier today, no ears as far a I can see.
2962:
I don't think those are comparable at all. Morganucodon is
1557:, with generalized cynodont/mammaliaform body proportions. 62:
File:Flickr - don macauley - Threskiornis aethiopicus 2.jpg
3563:
had been more variation, there's just no evidence for it.
2098:
Figure 3A on p. 436, shows the position of the eardrum in
1103:
Interesting, could the plants in this Daspletosaurus image
4137:
The skull is based in the reconstruction by Ralph Molnar
3718:
I think it's good! Now we only need the article, hehe...
58:
File:Threskiornis_aethiopicus_-London_Zoo,_England-8a.jpg
2007:, the latter should also be represented without pinnae. 1879:), which certainly have pinnae, are limited to 10.5 kHz. 4281:
All right then, I'll continue working in the article.--
2967:
somewhat likely, they would hardly had mentioned them.
2316:. There are surely better sources, though, specific to 1338:
Well, relatively short at least, look here for example
2363:
The Middle Ear: Science, Otosurgery, and Technology
64:. Can you draw it walking to show "knees" bending? 2905:last July, thereby advancing the hypothesis that 2880:http://www.app.pan.pl/article/item/app51-001.html 1892:but you really the opinion of someone else here. 1693:I like the tilt, it gives it a more lively look! 3974:Where should it be exactly? Got a photo/source? 2335: 4176:in a SVG version. I hope this will be useful.-- 4173:I've submitted a new version of the image here 4019:Are the osteoderms photos? If so, from where? 3364:underwater, based on the figures in this paper 4435:Ok, I put it in the classification section.-- 3103:is defective in that the spur is not present. 2508: 8: 1178:The skull is based on figures in the paper ( 3736:is done, and yes, it includes the image. -- 1810:(now there's a primitive looking critter!). 1248:), so I don't think I've drawn it too big. 119:it must be an indication of the thickness. 394:has red skin on its face, but that is the 3868:Another image of a mammal, this time the 2940:I propose that the standards be updated. 1310:I think the wing finger could be longer? 3701:and a reconstrution made by Paula Couto 3240:ignoring, provides no such affirmation. 1561:has a photo of the bottom of the skull. 1447:And I gave it some veggies to munch on. 60:. Look which way the "knees" bend; see 4151:; the foot and hand bones are based in 3996:I've made a skeletal reconstruction of 276:How about these "pants" and leg length? 2396: 2385: 1083:field horsetails can be quite "grassy" 2312:; it even tentatively identifies the 7: 2133:I'll give it a shot at some point. 1960:, page 50. I hope this helps a bit. 1848:Would external pinnae be present in 914:I thought that might be the reason. 3780:Someone has uploaded this image of 2752: 2729: 2706: 2684: 2627: 2600: 2593: 2571: 2550: 2530: 2523: 1601:The Origin and Evolution of Mammals 1067:plants like cycads and horsetails. 254:File:Mandarin_Duck_(4482350550).jpg 38:Here's something I threw together. 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology 4358:image with all the known elements 4039:Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 3750:Good job, now you know the drill! 3431:showing crescent-shaped tail fluke 28: 3698:, here is a photo of the fossils 1767:bronze-model from the Smithsonian 1553:based on figures of the skull in 1341:, your new image matches better. 3175:Beside the point, but where has 2512:'s extratarsal spur is unsourced 1379:the long-necked archosauromorph 2516:See Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska in 2290:. So, where was the angular in 1603:(page 118), no animal south of 1087:again only the colour looks off 183:File:Roadrunner DeathValley.jpg 3635:19:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 3621:19:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 3606:19:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 3517:20:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 3501:19:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 3485:12:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC) 3467:16:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC) 2474:20:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 2460:21:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 2430:adjacent to the ectotympanic. 2336:Manley & Sienknecht (2013) 1954:nice picture of an echidna ear 224:That is a lot to think about. 1: 4445:08:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 4431:14:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 4417:09:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 4399:00:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 4385:23:58, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 4371:23:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 4348:09:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 4334:21:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 4319:10:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 4291:08:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 4277:17:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC) 4263:10:27, 24 November 2013 (UTC) 4249:22:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 4214:22:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 4200:11:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 4186:07:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 4169:00:27, 17 November 2013 (UTC) 4121:14:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 4107:17:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4093:14:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 4079:17:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4065:17:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4051:17:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4029:16:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4014:23:38, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 2901:You introduced the spur into 2440:14:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC) 2421:04:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC) 2356:21:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 2003:used as a model organism for 934:By complete chance, juvenile 3984:15:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 3969:15:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 3943:15:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 3928:15:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC) 3335:15:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 3320:15:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 3265:15:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 3224:11:22, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 3189:01:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 3080:There is published evidence. 1707:Uploaded, how does it look? 1549:is a sketch of the cynodont 95:File:Meleagris_ocellata1.jpg 3898:05:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC) 3882:01:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC) 3845:18:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 3828:10:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 3811:10:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 3796:01:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 3760:06:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 3746:00:20, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 3728:20:37, 2 October 2013 (UTC) 3714:17:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC) 3687:10:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC) 3671:23:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC) 3573:20:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC) 3554:20:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC) 3531:20:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC) 3409:00:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 3395:00:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC) 3377:23:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 3250:22:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC) 3169:20:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC) 3129:17:51, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 3074:and multituberculates like 2977:12:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC) 2950:23:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC) 2893:19:07, 4 October 2013 (UTC) 2873:18:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC) 2518:In Pursuit of Early Mammals 2495:22:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 2371:10.1007/978-1-4614-6591-1_2 2330:16:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC) 2278:18:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC) 2143:01:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC) 1433:Looks good with the belly. 4471: 3209:. The number of digits in 2425:Petter, if you think that 2127:19:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2083:18:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2065:17:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2049:17:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2031:16:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2017:15:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 1991:02:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 1131:13:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 1116:11:25, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 1099:09:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 1077:00:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 770:03:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 299:File:Kori_Bustard_SMTC.jpg 4389:Oops, I'll edit that :)-- 3649:Hi, I made this image of 3590:Image:Pseudotribos BW.jpg 3425:Modern reconstruction of 3385:Looks good to me so far. 2770: 2757: 2750: 2734: 2727: 2711: 2704: 2689: 2682: 2649: 2632: 2625: 2605: 2598: 2591: 2576: 2569: 2555: 2548: 2535: 2528: 2250:06:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 2236:06:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 2222:06:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 2203:23:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 2189:23:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 2175:23:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1970:20:50, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1938:19:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1923:17:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1902:16:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1863:14:07, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1844:13:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1830:13:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1797:11:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 1782:19:40, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 1731:06:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 1717:21:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 1703:19:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 1689:22:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 1655:09:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 1638:09:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 1586:02:48, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 1571:22:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC) 1533:16:34, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 1507:14:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 1484:13:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 1457:00:31, 20 July 2013 (UTC) 1443:16:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 1429:15:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 1412:13:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 1397:12:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 1351:13:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 1334:12:13, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 1320:22:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1305:18:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 1272:20:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1258:16:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1219:10:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 1203:00:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 1147:21:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 1062:17:57, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1042:17:37, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 1018:21:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 1000:21:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 978:19:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 955:00:53, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 924:17:32, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 910:13:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 888:11:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 870:14:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 851:11:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 832:14:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 814:11:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 691:22:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC) 672:23:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 658:13:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 643:01:18, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 628:01:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 611:00:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 596:00:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 582:21:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 563:21:35, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 549:20:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 534:17:32, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 520:14:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 502:11:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 479:13:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 458:11:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 439:13:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 413:11:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 382:13:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 364:11:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 344:23:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 311:23:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 288:22:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 266:22:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 248:22:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 234:22:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 219:22:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 195:22:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 173:21:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 145:21:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 129:21:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 111:21:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 89:21:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 74:21:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 51:21:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 4204:There is the image... -- 3625:Thanks. Darn cache. . . 3428:Platecarpus tympaniticus 2294:? I have mentioned that 1383:based on the figures in 726:Threskiornis aethiopicus 4361:, what do you think? -- 1416:Makes sense, how's this 1230:describing the tail of 900:has something similar. 185:. Knees look too high. 115:How about the legs now? 4229: 3865: 3444: 3432: 1910: 1668: 1607:had a lipid.secreting 1472: 1373: 1292: 1106:pass for any of that? 727: 322: 4228: 4035:Sebecus cf. huilensis 3864: 3438: 3424: 2999:File:Probelesodon.jpg 2925:File:Probelesodon.jpg 2903:File:Morganucodon.jpg 2857:File:Morganucodon.jpg 2334:I strongly recommend 1909: 1871:. Opinions differ on 1853:transmitting sounds. 1667: 1470: 1372: 1291: 725: 321: 3957:File:Gobiconodon.jpg 3856:Cryptoprocta spelaea 3786:... Is it useful? -- 3360:is a restoration of 3101:File:Gobiconodon.jpg 936:Malagasy Sacred Ibis 3382:I guess this is it? 4230: 3866: 3445: 3443:with bi-lobed tail 3433: 3417:Mosasaur tail fins 3304:Appalalachiosaurus 3283:Appalalachiosaurus 2859:shows the spur on 1911: 1669: 1473: 1374: 1293: 728: 323: 99:this one on Flickr 4354:Also I've made a 3281:In my comment on 2853: 2852: 2844: 2843: 2835: 2834: 2826: 2825: 2817: 2816: 2808: 2807: 2799: 2798: 2790: 2789: 2781: 2780: 2671: 2670: 2662: 2661: 2537:Sinoconodontidae 2388:cite encyclopedia 1763:Asian house shrew 898:Straw-necked Ibis 4462: 4144:by Felipe Elias 3211:Appalachiosaurus 3177:Appalachiosaurus 3156:Appalachiosaurus 2753: 2730: 2707: 2692:Multituberculata 2685: 2628: 2622:Australosphenida 2601: 2594: 2572: 2567:(spur acquired) 2551: 2531: 2524: 2448:WP:Third Opinion 2404: 2398: 2393: 2391: 2383: 2306:Probainognathian 2106:Probainognathian 2093: 4470: 4469: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4461: 4460: 4459: 3994: 3953: 3908: 3859: 3778: 3647: 3587: 3419: 3355: 3066:"arbitrary". A 2854: 2845: 2836: 2827: 2818: 2809: 2800: 2791: 2782: 2672: 2663: 2557:Morganucodonta 2514: 2394: 2384: 2380: 2360: 2112:and, also like 2091: 1952:Edit: Here's a 1949: 1877:Elephas maximus 1755: 1609:harderian gland 1544: 1367: 1326:El fosilmanĂ­aco 1297:El fosilmanĂ­aco 1286: 1173: 1028: 1026:Mezosoic plants 425:and (formerly) 392:Madagascar Ibis 35: 26: 25: 24: 22:Paleoart review 12: 11: 5: 4468: 4466: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4311:Petter Bøckman 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4041:, 61: 20-27.-- 3993: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3952: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3907: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3858: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3777: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3646: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3586: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3534: 3533: 3519: 3504: 3503: 3488: 3487: 3439:Resoration of 3418: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3354: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3099:Incidentally, 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2896: 2895: 2851: 2850: 2847: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2823: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2814: 2811: 2810: 2806: 2805: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2796: 2793: 2792: 2788: 2787: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2778: 2775: 2774: 2769: 2766: 2765: 2762: 2761: 2756: 2751: 2749: 2748:Tribosphenida 2745: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2733: 2728: 2726: 2722: 2721: 2718: 2717: 2714:Eutriconodonta 2710: 2705: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2688: 2683: 2681: 2678: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2656: 2655: 2648: 2645: 2644: 2641: 2640: 2631: 2626: 2624: 2618: 2617: 2614: 2613: 2604: 2599: 2597: 2592: 2590: 2587: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2575: 2570: 2568: 2564: 2563: 2560: 2559: 2554: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2543: 2540: 2539: 2534: 2529: 2527: 2522: 2513: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2406: 2405: 2378: 2281: 2280: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2242:Petter Bøckman 2214:Petter Bøckman 2181:Petter Bøckman 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2075:Petter Bøckman 1993: 1962:Petter Bøckman 1948: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1930:Petter Bøckman 1894:Petter Bøckman 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1822:Petter Bøckman 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1800: 1799: 1774:Petter Bøckman 1754: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1723:Petter Bøckman 1695:Petter Bøckman 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1630:Petter Bøckman 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1613:Brasilitherium 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1551:Brasilitherium 1543: 1540:Brasilitherium 1536: 1525:Petter Bøckman 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1476:Petter Bøckman 1404:Petter Bøckman 1366: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1172: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1123:Petter Bøckman 1091:Petter Bøckman 1045: 1044: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1003: 1002: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 958: 957: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 891: 890: 875: 874: 873: 872: 854: 853: 837: 836: 835: 834: 817: 816: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 505: 504: 484: 483: 482: 481: 461: 460: 444: 443: 442: 441: 416: 415: 387: 386: 385: 384: 367: 366: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 316: 315: 314: 313: 291: 290: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 201: 163:Any thoughts? 158: 157: 156: 155: 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 148: 147: 34: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4467: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4414: 4410: 4406: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4360: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4331: 4327: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4316: 4312: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4227: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4175: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4157:Stratiosuchus 4154: 4150: 4146: 4143: 4139: 4136: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4003: 4001: 4000: 3992: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3951: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3906: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3863: 3857: 3854: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3818: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3784: 3776: 3773: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3700: 3697: 3693: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3654: 3652: 3645: 3642: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3585: 3584: 3580: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3562: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3540: 3536: 3535: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3505: 3502: 3498: 3494: 3491:Now updated. 3490: 3489: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3449: 3442: 3437: 3430: 3429: 3423: 3416: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3363: 3362:Batrachomimus 3359: 3353: 3352: 3351:Batrachomimus 3348: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3284: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3157: 3151: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3143: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3102: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3026: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2993:I introduced 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2965: 2964:right outside 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2849: 2848: 2840: 2839: 2831: 2830: 2822: 2821: 2813: 2812: 2804: 2803: 2795: 2794: 2786: 2785: 2777: 2776: 2773: 2768: 2767: 2764: 2763: 2760: 2755: 2754: 2747: 2746: 2743: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2732: 2731: 2724: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2715: 2709: 2708: 2702: 2701: 2698: 2697: 2694: 2693: 2687: 2686: 2680: 2679: 2676: 2675: 2667: 2666: 2658: 2657: 2654: 2653: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2642: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2630: 2629: 2623: 2620: 2619: 2616: 2615: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2603: 2602: 2596: 2595: 2589: 2588: 2585: 2584: 2581: 2580: 2574: 2573: 2566: 2565: 2562: 2561: 2558: 2553: 2552: 2546: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2538: 2533: 2532: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2519: 2511: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2428: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2402: 2389: 2381: 2379:9781461465904 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2302: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2266: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2102: 2097: 2090: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1851: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1809: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1770: 1768: 1764: 1758: 1753: 1752: 1748: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1495: 1492:was probably 1491: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1469: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1371: 1365: 1364: 1360: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1290: 1284: 1281: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1233:Mystriosuchus 1229: 1225: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1191: 1186: 1184: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 988: 979: 975: 971: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 937: 933: 932: 925: 921: 917: 913: 912: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 894: 893: 892: 889: 885: 881: 877: 876: 871: 867: 863: 858: 857: 856: 855: 852: 848: 844: 839: 838: 833: 829: 825: 821: 820: 819: 818: 815: 811: 807: 803: 802: 771: 767: 763: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 724: 692: 688: 684: 680: 675: 674: 673: 669: 665: 661: 660: 659: 655: 651: 646: 645: 644: 640: 636: 631: 630: 629: 625: 621: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 608: 604: 599: 598: 597: 593: 589: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 570: 566: 565: 564: 560: 556: 552: 551: 550: 546: 542: 537: 536: 535: 531: 527: 523: 522: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508: 507: 506: 503: 499: 495: 491: 486: 485: 480: 476: 472: 468: 465: 464: 463: 462: 459: 455: 451: 446: 445: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 414: 410: 406: 401: 397: 393: 389: 388: 383: 379: 375: 371: 370: 369: 368: 365: 361: 357: 353: 352: 345: 341: 337: 332: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 312: 308: 304: 300: 295: 294: 293: 292: 289: 285: 281: 278: 275: 274: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 237: 236: 235: 231: 227: 223: 222: 221: 220: 216: 212: 198: 197: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 175: 174: 170: 166: 162: 160: 159: 146: 142: 138: 135: 132: 131: 130: 126: 122: 117: 114: 113: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 91: 90: 86: 82: 77: 76: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 54: 53: 52: 48: 44: 40: 37: 36: 33: 30: 23: 19: 4404: 4355: 4307: 4156: 4152: 4148: 4141: 4038: 4034: 3997: 3995: 3990: 3954: 3949: 3911: 3909: 3904: 3867: 3855: 3781: 3779: 3774: 3696:Huilatherium 3695: 3691: 3656: 3651:Huilatherium 3650: 3648: 3644:Huilatherium 3643: 3594:Pseudotribos 3593: 3588: 3583:Pseudotribos 3581: 3560: 3538: 3446: 3441:P. saturator 3440: 3426: 3361: 3356: 3349: 3308:Castorocauda 3307: 3303: 3282: 3237: 3233: 3210: 3206: 3203:Dryptosaurus 3202: 3198: 3194: 3176: 3154: 3149: 3139: 3079: 3076:Catopsbaatar 3075: 3072:Castorocauda 3071: 3068:Castorocauda 3067: 3063: 3025:Morganucodon 3024: 3002: 2995:Probelesodon 2994: 2963: 2929:Morganucodon 2928: 2921:Morganucodon 2920: 2907:Morganucodon 2906: 2861:Morganucodon 2860: 2855: 2771: 2758: 2736: 2735: 2725:(spur lost) 2713: 2712: 2691: 2690: 2651: 2650: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2621: 2609:Pseudotribos 2608: 2607: 2606: 2578: 2577: 2556: 2536: 2517: 2515: 2510:Morganucodon 2509: 2483:Morganucodon 2482: 2427:Morganucodon 2426: 2365:. pp. 7–29. 2362: 2344:Morganucodon 2343: 2318:Morganucodon 2317: 2310:Morganucodon 2309: 2299: 2296:Kemp (2007), 2292:Morganucodon 2291: 2288:Morganucodon 2287: 2208: 2114:Morganucodon 2113: 2110:Morganucodon 2109: 2099: 2096:Kemp (2007), 2071:Morganucodon 2070: 2037:Morganucodon 2036: 2005:Morganucodon 2004: 2000: 1979:Morganucodon 1978: 1945:Morganucodon 1944: 1912: 1890: 1876: 1873:Morganucodon 1872: 1850:Morganucodon 1849: 1771: 1759: 1756: 1751:Morganucodon 1749: 1624: 1612: 1605:Morganucodon 1604: 1559:This article 1550: 1545: 1538: 1521: 1493: 1489: 1471:Green iguana 1462: 1380: 1375: 1361: 1294: 1283:Eurazhdarcho 1237: 1231: 1188: 1174: 1167: 896:The related 679:Bird anatomy 568: 423:Threskiornis 399: 395: 207: 32:RĂŠunion Ibis 4153:Baurusuchus 4142:Baurusuchus 3961:Peter Brown 3950:Gobiconodon 3912:Avaceratops 3905:Avaceratops 3870:giant fossa 3783:Makaracetus 3775:Makaracetus 3627:Peter Brown 3598:Peter Brown 3539:Platecarpus 3455:Platecarpus 3312:Peter Brown 3242:Peter Brown 3181:Peter Brown 3121:Peter Brown 2942:Peter Brown 2865:Peter Brown 2772:Metatheria 2737:Vincelestes 2652:Monotremata 2487:Peter Brown 2452:Peter Brown 2432:Peter Brown 2348:Peter Brown 2322:Peter Brown 2301:Chiniquodon 2209:Thrinaxodon 2119:Peter Brown 2101:Chiniquodon 2041:Peter Brown 2009:Peter Brown 1983:Peter Brown 1223:How's this? 3999:Langstonia 3991:Langstonia 3692:Scarrittia 3658:Scarrittia 3216:MMartyniuk 3207:Eotyrannus 3195:Yutyrannus 1555:this paper 1385:this paper 1228:this paper 427:Geronticus 400:Lophotibis 396:Lophotibis 3457:article. 3401:Smokeybjb 3369:Smokeybjb 3234:prominent 2759:Eutheria 2579:Docodonta 2397:|ref=harv 2314:ear canal 1958:Mammalogy 1855:Smokeybjb 1709:Smokeybjb 1681:Smokeybjb 1563:Smokeybjb 1499:Smokeybjb 1490:Pamelaria 1449:Smokeybjb 1421:Smokeybjb 1389:Smokeybjb 1381:Pamelaria 1363:Pamelaria 1250:Smokeybjb 1195:Smokeybjb 1069:Smokeybjb 4423:FunkMonk 4377:FunkMonk 4269:FunkMonk 4241:FunkMonk 4192:FunkMonk 4113:FunkMonk 4085:FunkMonk 4057:FunkMonk 4021:FunkMonk 3976:FunkMonk 3935:FunkMonk 3890:FunkMonk 3820:FunkMonk 3803:FunkMonk 3752:FunkMonk 3720:FunkMonk 3679:FunkMonk 3613:FunkMonk 3565:FunkMonk 3523:FunkMonk 3509:FunkMonk 3493:FunkMonk 3477:FunkMonk 3459:FunkMonk 3387:FunkMonk 3327:FunkMonk 3257:FunkMonk 3161:FunkMonk 3150:argument 2969:FunkMonk 2885:FunkMonk 2466:FunkMonk 2413:FunkMonk 2395:Invalid 2270:FunkMonk 2228:FunkMonk 2195:FunkMonk 2167:FunkMonk 2135:FunkMonk 2057:FunkMonk 2023:FunkMonk 1999:If they 1915:FunkMonk 1836:FunkMonk 1789:FunkMonk 1647:FunkMonk 1578:FunkMonk 1435:FunkMonk 1343:FunkMonk 1312:FunkMonk 1264:FunkMonk 1238:Rutiodon 1211:FunkMonk 1190:Rutiodon 1139:FunkMonk 1108:FunkMonk 1054:FunkMonk 1010:FunkMonk 947:FunkMonk 943:neotenic 902:FunkMonk 862:FunkMonk 824:FunkMonk 762:FunkMonk 664:FunkMonk 635:FunkMonk 603:FunkMonk 574:FunkMonk 541:FunkMonk 512:FunkMonk 471:FunkMonk 431:FunkMonk 374:FunkMonk 336:FunkMonk 280:FunkMonk 240:FunkMonk 211:FunkMonk 165:FunkMonk 137:FunkMonk 121:FunkMonk 81:FunkMonk 43:FunkMonk 20:‎ | 4437:Rextron 4409:Rextron 4405:Sebecus 4391:Rextron 4363:Rextron 4356:Sebecus 4340:Rextron 4326:Rextron 4283:Rextron 4255:Rextron 4206:Rextron 4178:Rextron 4161:Rextron 4149:Sebecus 4099:Rextron 4071:Rextron 4043:Rextron 4006:Rextron 3874:Rextron 3837:Rextron 3788:Rextron 3738:Rextron 3734:article 3706:Rextron 3663:Rextron 3546:Rextron 3142:WP:OR/N 2636:Bishops 1808:moonrat 1169:Protome 1034:Igel 14 992:Snowman 970:Snowman 916:Snowman 880:Snowman 843:Snowman 806:Snowman 760:issue. 683:Snowman 650:Snowman 620:Snowman 588:Snowman 555:Snowman 526:Snowman 494:Snowman 450:Snowman 405:Snowman 356:Snowman 303:Snowman 258:Snowman 226:Snowman 187:Snowman 103:Snowman 66:Snowman 3205:, and 3199:Dilong 1463:Iguana 1376:Here's 4267:Yup! 3920:Rnnsh 3561:could 3537:Even 3399:Yep! 3045:case. 2308:like 2108:like 16:< 4441:talk 4427:talk 4413:talk 4407:?)-- 4395:talk 4381:talk 4367:talk 4344:talk 4330:talk 4315:talk 4287:talk 4273:talk 4259:talk 4245:talk 4210:talk 4196:talk 4190:Ok! 4182:talk 4165:talk 4155:and 4117:talk 4103:talk 4089:talk 4075:talk 4061:talk 4047:talk 4025:talk 4010:talk 3980:talk 3965:talk 3939:talk 3924:talk 3916:link 3894:talk 3878:talk 3841:talk 3824:talk 3807:talk 3792:talk 3756:talk 3742:talk 3732:The 3724:talk 3710:talk 3683:talk 3667:talk 3631:talk 3617:talk 3602:talk 3569:talk 3550:talk 3527:talk 3513:talk 3497:talk 3481:talk 3463:talk 3405:talk 3391:talk 3373:talk 3357:Here 3331:talk 3316:talk 3261:talk 3246:talk 3220:talk 3185:talk 3165:talk 3125:talk 2973:talk 2946:talk 2889:talk 2869:talk 2491:talk 2470:talk 2456:talk 2436:talk 2417:talk 2401:help 2375:ISBN 2352:talk 2340:here 2326:talk 2304:, a 2274:talk 2246:talk 2232:talk 2218:talk 2199:talk 2185:talk 2171:talk 2139:talk 2123:talk 2104:, a 2079:talk 2061:talk 2045:talk 2027:talk 2013:talk 1987:talk 1966:talk 1934:talk 1919:talk 1898:talk 1869:here 1859:talk 1840:talk 1826:talk 1793:talk 1778:talk 1727:talk 1713:talk 1699:talk 1685:talk 1651:talk 1634:talk 1582:talk 1567:talk 1546:Here 1529:talk 1503:talk 1480:talk 1453:talk 1439:talk 1425:talk 1408:talk 1393:talk 1347:talk 1330:talk 1316:talk 1301:talk 1268:talk 1254:talk 1246:here 1244:and 1242:here 1215:talk 1199:talk 1143:talk 1127:talk 1112:talk 1095:talk 1073:talk 1058:talk 1038:talk 1014:talk 996:talk 974:talk 951:talk 920:talk 906:talk 884:talk 866:talk 847:talk 828:talk 810:talk 766:talk 687:talk 668:talk 654:talk 639:talk 624:talk 607:talk 592:talk 578:talk 569:less 559:talk 545:talk 530:talk 516:talk 498:talk 475:talk 454:talk 435:talk 409:talk 378:talk 360:talk 340:talk 307:talk 284:talk 262:talk 244:talk 230:talk 215:talk 191:talk 169:talk 141:talk 125:talk 107:talk 97:and 85:talk 70:talk 47:talk 4159:.-- 3704:.-- 3238:not 3064:not 3003:you 2367:doi 2001:are 1947:Ear 1494:not 4443:) 4429:) 4415:) 4397:) 4383:) 4369:) 4346:) 4332:) 4317:) 4289:) 4275:) 4261:) 4247:) 4212:) 4198:) 4184:) 4167:) 4119:) 4105:) 4091:) 4077:) 4063:) 4049:) 4027:) 4012:) 3982:) 3967:) 3959:. 3941:) 3926:) 3896:) 3880:) 3843:) 3835:-- 3826:) 3809:) 3794:) 3758:) 3744:) 3726:) 3712:) 3685:) 3669:) 3633:) 3619:) 3604:) 3571:) 3552:) 3544:-- 3529:) 3515:) 3499:) 3483:) 3465:) 3407:) 3393:) 3375:) 3367:. 3333:) 3318:) 3263:) 3248:) 3222:) 3201:, 3197:, 3187:) 3167:) 3144:. 3127:) 2975:) 2948:) 2891:) 2871:) 2493:) 2485:. 2472:) 2458:) 2438:) 2419:) 2392:: 2390:}} 2386:{{ 2373:. 2354:) 2346:. 2328:) 2276:) 2248:) 2234:) 2220:) 2201:) 2187:) 2173:) 2141:) 2125:) 2092:If 2081:) 2063:) 2047:) 2029:) 2015:) 1989:) 1981:. 1968:) 1936:) 1921:) 1900:) 1861:) 1842:) 1828:) 1795:) 1780:) 1729:) 1715:) 1701:) 1687:) 1653:) 1636:) 1625:If 1584:) 1569:) 1531:) 1505:) 1482:) 1455:) 1441:) 1427:) 1419:? 1410:) 1395:) 1387:. 1349:) 1332:) 1318:) 1303:) 1270:) 1256:) 1217:) 1201:) 1193:. 1145:) 1129:) 1114:) 1097:) 1075:) 1060:) 1040:) 1016:) 998:) 976:) 953:) 922:) 908:) 886:) 868:) 849:) 830:) 812:) 768:) 689:) 681:. 670:) 656:) 641:) 626:) 609:) 594:) 580:) 561:) 547:) 532:) 518:) 500:) 477:) 456:) 437:) 411:) 380:) 362:) 342:) 309:) 286:) 264:) 256:. 246:) 232:) 217:) 193:) 171:) 143:) 127:) 109:) 87:) 72:) 49:) 4439:( 4425:( 4411:( 4393:( 4379:( 4365:( 4342:( 4328:( 4313:( 4285:( 4271:( 4257:( 4243:( 4208:( 4194:( 4180:( 4163:( 4115:( 4101:( 4087:( 4073:( 4059:( 4045:( 4023:( 4008:( 3978:( 3963:( 3937:( 3922:( 3892:( 3876:( 3839:( 3822:( 3805:( 3790:( 3754:( 3740:( 3722:( 3708:( 3681:( 3665:( 3629:( 3615:( 3600:( 3567:( 3548:( 3525:( 3511:( 3495:( 3479:( 3461:( 3403:( 3389:( 3371:( 3329:( 3314:( 3259:( 3244:( 3218:( 3183:( 3163:( 3123:( 2971:( 2944:( 2931:. 2887:( 2867:( 2489:( 2468:( 2454:( 2434:( 2415:( 2403:) 2399:( 2382:. 2369:: 2350:( 2324:( 2272:( 2244:( 2230:( 2216:( 2197:( 2183:( 2169:( 2137:( 2121:( 2077:( 2059:( 2043:( 2025:( 2011:( 1997:. 1985:( 1964:( 1932:( 1917:( 1896:( 1857:( 1838:( 1824:( 1791:( 1776:( 1725:( 1711:( 1697:( 1683:( 1649:( 1632:( 1580:( 1565:( 1527:( 1501:( 1478:( 1474:. 1451:( 1437:( 1423:( 1406:( 1391:( 1345:( 1328:( 1314:( 1299:( 1266:( 1252:( 1213:( 1197:( 1141:( 1125:( 1110:( 1093:( 1071:( 1056:( 1036:( 1012:( 994:( 972:( 949:( 918:( 904:( 882:( 864:( 845:( 826:( 808:( 764:( 685:( 666:( 652:( 637:( 622:( 605:( 590:( 576:( 557:( 543:( 528:( 514:( 496:( 473:( 452:( 433:( 407:( 376:( 358:( 338:( 305:( 282:( 260:( 242:( 228:( 213:( 189:( 167:( 139:( 123:( 105:( 83:( 68:( 45:(

Index

Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology
Paleoart review
RĂŠunion Ibis

FunkMonk
talk
21:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Threskiornis_aethiopicus_-London_Zoo,_England-8a.jpg
File:Flickr - don macauley - Threskiornis aethiopicus 2.jpg
Snowman
talk
21:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
FunkMonk
talk
21:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Meleagris_ocellata1.jpg
this one on Flickr
Snowman
talk
21:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

FunkMonk
talk
21:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

FunkMonk
talk
21:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

FunkMonk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑