Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Pokémon/Layout - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

60: 31: 406:. However, Milotic and Gyarados have no explicit connection and so would be violating the previous guideline. Instances where the different connections are believed to be equal in explictness and notability will be handled on a case by case basis as per discussion and consensus on that instance. 358:. There happens to exist Pokédex info that directly mentions these species' animosity. Additionally there has even been an episode devoted to the topic. This relation can even include the fact that they are version specific Pokémon. A bad example would be an article entitled 306:
A group article is to be created whenever any Pokémon has an explicit, noteworthy connection to another Pokémon. The most common of these would be evolutionary connections. When these group articles are created, the Pokémon's entry in the list should be summarized as per
538:
because it's the earliest evolution. Besides the similar reasons listed above at Naming conventions, this also aids readers in understanding the "evolution" of the species as a whole, seeing how it was transformed over time by new releases.
275:
All Pokémon, by default, are at least deserving of a few detailed paragraphs discussing their video game/anime/manga/TCG/other appearances, and the Pokémon in general. The template for inserting information relevant to all Pokémon is
139: 134: 568:
All sections that are grouped like this should be able to have a lead. If you are having trouble coming up with a good lead, the perceived connection between the Pokémon may not be satisfying the criteria.
604:
example of Pinsir. It adequately discusses the subject without disrupting the rest of the article. It still fits nicely as a section and should not be split out. However, a section that looked like
443:
for a condensed listing in that order), or if National number ever becomes defunct, FOO is the first Pokémon ever introduced in that evolutionary line. This means that the article which talks about
230: 225: 220: 264: 215: 196: 451:. It is done this way because it prevents page moves that would potentially occur whenever Nintendo introduced a new Pokémon to that evolutionary line. Also, for the sake of explanation, 483:) because they do not belong to any other explicit group. Rather than leave a substandard article on its own it is preferred to primarily group all legendaries by region into a 113: 378:
An unusual case may occur where a Pokémon has an explicit connection to more than one other Pokémon. Ideally they would be all grouped together under a defining title like
240: 235: 129: 85: 180: 99: 402:
connection to their evolutions is preferred. The simple reason is that it is nearly impossible to create an article that defines the subjects properly short of
554:. In many cases it would be appropriate to create parent sections for smaller, relevant groups. The smaller sections should still follow the guidelines for 160: 565:== Raikou, Entei, and Suicune == LEAD === Raikou === === Entei === === Suicune === == Lugia and Ho-Oh == LEAD === Lugia === === Ho-OH === == Celebi == 45:
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the
90: 46: 507:. Ampersands (&) are to be avoided. In the case that more than two Pokémon need to be listed in the title the preferred convention is 80: 64: 17: 403: 298:
to the greatest number of people. If it is later discovered that the list pages regularly exceed 32K, different numbers may be used.
499:
Similar to the conventions for evolutionary lines, naming is determined by National number. For example, the article would be named
354:. The most common reliable sources for Pokémon articles are the games/anime/manga themselves. A non-evolution example would be 628: 526:
Like naming conventions, sections should be ordered by National Pokédex number. This means that after the lead, the section on
155: 254: 259: 204:
For information regarding the discussions that took place to implement this proposal please review the following links.
287: 531: 448: 325: 484: 165: 543: 379: 383: 436: 500: 355: 515: 594: 359: 231:
WT:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 14#Is there any reason why all Pokemon are necessarily notable?
508: 427:. It also helps people understand why a change that they thought was helpful ended up being reverted. 38: 30: 315: 280: 608:
version of Bulbasaur would be cumbersome to read through in an article that still needs to discuss
295: 546:), National number already groups them appropriately so there is no need to worry about keeping 440: 226:
WT:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 11#General issue with many of the Pokemon articles...
582: 420: 291: 504: 586: 578: 562:
and be named following the naming conventions for "Pokémon grouped by other connections."
590: 488: 487:
article. The minor groups can then be worked on until they are ready to be split off per
424: 416: 363: 351: 308: 589:
information contained in a section that it can be broken out into its own article per
336: 622: 175: 170: 597:}} tag so that other editors can be aware and voice any comments or suggestions. 491:. The new articles would follow the conventions outlined in "other connections". 59: 332: 613: 472: 391: 609: 551: 527: 468: 479:), if they are only grouped in this way some Pokémon become stranded ( 350:
An explicit connection is one that has been directly referred to in a
480: 476: 439:. Where FOO is the name of the first Pokémon by National number (see 387: 415:
It is important to agree upon naming conventions in addition to the
286:. The current arrangement is to list Pokémon in groups of 20, e.g. 216:
WT:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 8#Being serious about this
547: 535: 444: 467:
While many legendary Pokémon are related in smaller groups (e.g.
600:
An example of an article that should remain a section would be
25: 459:
because it is grammatically better to use an adjective form.
290:. This is admittedly an arbitrary number. It is thought that 265:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon (1-20)
221:
WT:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 11#.22Importance.22
255:
Talk:List of Pokémon (1-20)#Merged Proposal by Zappernapper
241:
WT:WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 15#A combination proposal
605: 601: 577:
Ideally, the situation will arise when there is enough
435:
The titles for these types of group articles should be
236:
WT:WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 15#Huntail looks awful.
366:
by fans, that they exist as male/female counterparts.
37:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
362:. There exists no concrete discussion, outside of 404:Magikarp & Gyarados and Feebas & Milotic 386:. However in cases like connections between 331:. It is important to define what is meant by 8: 593:. Before doing so, it is best to add a {{ 542:In the case of larger group articles ( 7: 495:Pokémon grouped by other connections 463:Pokémon grouped by legendary status 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pokémon 24: 58: 29: 1: 260:Talk:Pidgey evolutionary line 431:Pokémon grouped by evolution 573:Individual species articles 645: 417:Knowledge (XXG) guidelines 532:Pikachu evolutionary line 449:Pikachu evolutionary line 419:. This reduces needless 294:is likely to be the most 485:Legendary REGION Pokémon 321:should be replaced with 544:Legendary Johto Pokémon 384:Eevee evolutionary line 380:Legendary Hoenn Pokémon 629:Inactive project pages 373:Noteworthy connections 288:List of Pokémon (1-20) 530:should come first in 437:FOO evolutionary line 197:Video game characters 501:Zangoose and Seviper 356:Zangoose and Seviper 345:Explicit connections 516:Foo and bar and baz 247:Related discussions 208:Project discussions 135:Articles by quality 73:General information 65:WikiProject Pokémon 411:Naming conventions 360:Tauros and Miltank 509:Foo, bar, and baz 148:Project templates 114:Reception archive 81:Main project page 54: 53: 636: 522:Section ordering 505:Plusle and Minun 455:is preferred to 330: 326:pokeinfoboxsmall 324: 320: 314: 285: 279: 271:Lists of Pokémon 156:Talk page banner 62: 50: 33: 26: 644: 643: 639: 638: 637: 635: 634: 633: 619: 618: 575: 566: 524: 497: 465: 441:List of Pokémon 433: 413: 352:reliable source 328: 322: 318: 312: 304: 283: 277: 273: 202: 201: 192: 185: 151: 144: 125: 118: 76: 69: 44: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 642: 640: 632: 631: 621: 620: 574: 571: 564: 523: 520: 496: 493: 464: 461: 432: 429: 412: 409: 408: 407: 376: 375: 374: 368: 367: 348: 347: 346: 303: 302:Group articles 300: 272: 269: 268: 267: 262: 257: 251: 250: 248: 244: 243: 238: 233: 228: 223: 218: 212: 211: 209: 200: 199: 193: 186: 184: 183: 178: 173: 168: 163: 158: 152: 145: 143: 142: 140:Assessment log 137: 132: 130:Article alerts 126: 119: 117: 116: 111: 105: 104: 103: 102: 94: 93: 88: 83: 77: 70: 56: 55: 52: 51: 43: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 641: 630: 627: 626: 624: 617: 615: 611: 607: 603: 598: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 572: 570: 563: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 540: 537: 533: 529: 521: 519: 517: 514: 510: 506: 502: 494: 492: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 462: 460: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 430: 428: 426: 422: 418: 410: 405: 401: 400:more explicit 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 372: 371: 370: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 338: 334: 327: 317: 310: 301: 299: 297: 293: 289: 282: 270: 266: 263: 261: 258: 256: 253: 252: 249: 246: 245: 242: 239: 237: 234: 232: 229: 227: 224: 222: 219: 217: 214: 213: 210: 207: 206: 205: 198: 195: 194: 191: 190: 182: 179: 177: 174: 172: 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 153: 150: 149: 141: 138: 136: 133: 131: 128: 127: 124: 123: 115: 112: 110: 107: 106: 101: 98: 97: 96: 95: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 78: 75: 74: 68: 67: 66: 61: 48: 42: 40: 35: 32: 28: 27: 19: 599: 595:splitsection 587:well-written 576: 567: 559: 556:explicitness 555: 541: 525: 512: 498: 466: 456: 453:evolutionary 452: 447:is found at 434: 414: 399: 396:more notable 395: 305: 274: 203: 188: 187: 147: 146: 121: 120: 108: 72: 71: 63: 57: 47:village pump 36: 364:speculation 316:pokeinfobox 281:Pokeinfobox 189:Task forces 86:Noticeboard 579:verifiable 560:notability 337:noteworthy 296:accessible 181:Navigation 176:Invitation 41:reference. 39:historical 457:evolution 425:edit wars 292:this size 623:Category 614:Venusaur 473:Articuno 392:Magikarp 333:explicit 122:Articles 610:Ivysaur 583:neutral 552:Suicune 528:Pikachu 469:Moltres 171:Welcome 161:Userbox 585:, and 534:, not 481:Deoxys 477:Zapdos 475:, and 394:, the 388:Feebas 109:Layout 591:WP:SS 550:near 548:Entei 536:Pichu 489:WP:SS 445:Pichu 421:moves 309:WP:SS 100:Lists 91:Style 16:< 612:and 606:this 602:this 558:and 423:and 398:and 390:and 335:and 311:and 166:Stub 513:not 503:or 382:or 625:: 616:. 581:, 518:. 511:, 471:, 339:. 329:}} 323:{{ 319:}} 313:{{ 284:}} 278:{{ 49:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pokémon

historical
village pump

WikiProject Pokémon
Main project page
Noticeboard
Style
Lists
Layout
Reception archive
Article alerts
Articles by quality
Assessment log
Talk page banner
Userbox
Stub
Welcome
Invitation
Navigation
Video game characters
WT:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 8#Being serious about this
WT:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 11#.22Importance.22
WT:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 11#General issue with many of the Pokemon articles...
WT:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 14#Is there any reason why all Pokemon are necessarily notable?
WT:WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 15#Huntail looks awful.
WT:WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 15#A combination proposal
Talk:List of Pokémon (1-20)#Merged Proposal by Zappernapper
Talk:Pidgey evolutionary line

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.