366:
468:
416:
136:
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the
179:
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their
200:
below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process that must be followed; this is documented in the
143:
Any member of WikiProject Romani people is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural
649:
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.
443:. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (
103:
to prepare for static releases of
Knowledge content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Knowledge as a
605:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element; it has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
158:
below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process that must be followed; this is documented in the
54:
articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the
567:
217:
If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the
99:
The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the
447:
where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for
87:
587:
317:
631:
335:
327:
73:
211:
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
473:
371:
290:
260:
512:
421:
307:
277:
454:
May be assigned by any reviewer, but, generally, articles submitted here will not be rated above 'B', unless they are already rated as 'GA' by
440:
404:
398:
571:
282:
should only be used for articles that could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Knowledge 1.0" standard.
448:
502:
390:
218:
187:
17:
575:
684:
455:
689:
394:
365:
496:
596:
415:
640:
50:
of the WikiProject Romani people! This department focuses on assessing the quality of
Knowledge's
439:
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in
28:
133:
template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?
482:
380:
521:
430:
72:
project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of
492:
543:
It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
618:
Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
560:
534:
238:
127:
114:
66:
549:
It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
678:
540:
It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
190:
can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there.
100:
56:
51:
296:
266:
154:
and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the
444:
62:
The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the
574:(for current B-Class articles that may not meet all the criteria) and
338:. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
334:
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in
295:
should only be used for articles that are currently listed as
265:
should only be used for articles that are currently listed as
665:
612:
Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
572:
Category:B-Class Romani people articles needing review
36:
615:
A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
120:
to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
451:
status, corresponds to the "Knowledge 1.0" standard.
533:
It is suitably referenced, and all major points are
166:
6. Can I request that someone else rate an article?
183:8. Where can I get more comments about an article?
576:Category:Potential B-Class Romani people articles
578:(for below-B-Class articles that meet all five)
530:The article meets the following five criteria:
230:An article's assessment is generated from the
214:11. What if I have a question not listed here?
176:7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
107:2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
96:1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?
8:
202:
197:
170:
160:
155:
570:for more details); the checklist generates
318:Category:Start-Class Romani people articles
169:Of course; to do so, please list it in the
336:Category:Unassessed Romani people articles
328:Category:Stub-Class Romani people articles
74:Category:Romani people articles by quality
546:It is free from major grammatical errors.
609:A particularly useful picture or graphic
363:
345:
291:Category:GA-Class Romani people articles
261:Category:FA-Class Romani people articles
413:
308:Category:B-Class Romani people articles
278:Category:A-Class Romani people articles
193:9. What if I don't agree with a rating?
248:{{WP Romani | ... | class=??? | ...}}
7:
491:Reserved for articles that meet the
467:
465:
389:Reserved for articles that meet the
18:Knowledge:WikiProject Romani people
456:Knowledge:Good articles/Candidates
252:The following values may be used:
208:10. Aren't the ratings subjective?
151:
24:
653:May be assigned by any reviewer
623:May be assigned by any reviewer
556:A checklist is available through
554:May be assigned by any reviewer
466:
414:
364:
566:to track the criteria (see the
198:section for assessment requests
171:section for assessment requests
1:
441:How to write a great article
219:main project discussion page
147:5. How do I rate an article?
568:project banner instructions
405:Featured article candidates
140:4. Who can assess articles?
706:
26:
685:WikiProject Romani people
391:featured article criteria
503:Good article nominations
690:WikiProject assessments
395:featured article status
226:Assessment instructions
203:assessment instructions
196:You can list it in the
161:assessment instructions
188:peer review department
88:general assessment FAQ
493:good article criteria
101:Knowledge 1.0 program
48:assessment department
535:appropriately cited
497:good article status
495:and have received
393:and have received
326:(adds articles to
316:(adds articles to
306:(adds articles to
289:(adds articles to
276:(adds articles to
259:(adds articles to
672:
671:
660:
659:
646:
602:
527:
488:
436:
386:
267:featured articles
234:parameter in the
123:3. Someone put a
697:
666:
645:
639:
636:
601:
595:
592:
565:
559:
526:
520:
517:
487:
481:
478:
471:
470:
469:
449:featured article
435:
429:
426:
419:
418:
399:community review
385:
379:
376:
369:
368:
346:
244:project banner:
243:
237:
132:
126:
119:
113:
71:
65:
39:
705:
704:
700:
699:
698:
696:
695:
694:
675:
674:
673:
643:
637:
599:
593:
563:
557:
524:
518:
485:
479:
433:
427:
383:
377:
355:Formal process
344:
241:
235:
228:
130:
124:
117:
111:
82:
69:
63:
46:Welcome to the
44:
43:
42:
35:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
703:
701:
693:
692:
687:
677:
676:
670:
669:
664:
662:
658:
657:
654:
651:
647:
635:
627:
626:
624:
621:
620:
619:
616:
613:
610:
603:
591:
583:
582:
580:
552:
551:
550:
547:
544:
541:
538:
528:
516:
508:
507:
505:
500:
489:
477:
462:
461:
459:
452:
437:
425:
410:
409:
407:
402:
387:
375:
360:
359:
356:
353:
350:
343:
340:
332:
331:
321:
311:
301:
284:
271:
250:
249:
227:
224:
223:
222:
215:
212:
209:
206:
194:
191:
184:
181:
177:
174:
167:
164:
148:
145:
141:
138:
134:
121:
108:
105:
97:
93:
92:
81:
78:
41:
40:
32:
27:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
702:
691:
688:
686:
683:
682:
680:
668:
667:
663:
655:
652:
648:
642:
634:
633:
629:
628:
625:
622:
617:
614:
611:
608:
607:
604:
598:
590:
589:
585:
584:
581:
579:
577:
573:
569:
562:
553:
548:
545:
542:
539:
536:
532:
531:
529:
523:
515:
514:
510:
509:
506:
504:
501:
498:
494:
490:
484:
476:
475:
464:
463:
460:
457:
453:
450:
446:
445:peer-reviewed
442:
438:
432:
424:
423:
417:
412:
411:
408:
406:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
382:
374:
373:
367:
362:
361:
357:
354:
351:
348:
347:
342:Quality scale
341:
339:
337:
329:
325:
322:
319:
315:
312:
309:
305:
302:
299:
298:
297:good articles
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
272:
269:
268:
262:
258:
255:
254:
253:
247:
246:
245:
240:
233:
225:
220:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
165:
162:
157:
153:
152:quality scale
149:
146:
142:
139:
135:
129:
122:
116:
109:
106:
102:
98:
95:
94:
91:
89:
86:See also the
84:
83:
79:
77:
75:
68:
60:
58:
53:
52:Romani people
49:
38:
34:
33:
30:
19:
661:
630:
586:
555:
511:
472:
420:
370:
333:
323:
313:
303:
294:
286:
281:
273:
264:
256:
251:
231:
229:
156:instructions
85:
61:
47:
45:
597:Start-Class
679:Categories
641:Stub-Class
180:reasoning.
150:Check the
59:program,
352:Criteria
144:disputes.
137:article).
110:Just add
483:GA-Class
381:FA-Class
358:Example
29:Shortcut
522:B-Class
431:A-Class
397:after
349:Label
173:below.
104:whole.
57:WP:1.0
37:WP:ROM
588:Start
561:WPROM
314:Start
239:WPROM
232:class
128:WPROM
115:WPROM
67:WPROM
16:<
632:Stub
324:Stub
186:The
80:FAQ
681::
656:]
644:}}
638:{{
600:}}
594:{{
564:}}
558:{{
525:}}
519:{{
499:.
486:}}
480:{{
474:GA
458:.
434:}}
428:{{
401:.
384:}}
378:{{
372:FA
293:;
287:GA
280:;
263:;
257:FA
242:}}
236:{{
131:}}
125:{{
118:}}
112:{{
76:.
70:}}
64:{{
537:.
513:B
422:A
330:)
320:)
310:)
304:B
300:)
274:A
270:)
221:.
205:.
163:.
90:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
