59:, and although there is little chance it will clear FAC I would like to see the article improved to A-class. To that end, I have decided to make use of your A-class review as well as the WPMILHIST review to get additional input as to how the article may be improved upon. Note that I am in school at the moment, so if I appear slow to respond here have patients; its likely school work has me tied up.
75:
98:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
74:
I propose closing this assessment since the article has already cleared A-class at the
Military history project and is currently a Featured Article Candidate.
21:
89:
34:
82:
68:
17:
43:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
55:
In my ongoing quest to improve the Iowa class battleship articles here I have recently expanded the article
56:
49:
64:
60:
79:
76:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/USS Kentucky (BB-66)
8:
33:The following discussion is preserved as an
88:The above discussion is preserved as an
7:
28:
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ships
1:
83:08:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
69:10:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
115:
95:Please do not modify it.
40:Please do not modify it.
57:USS Kentucky (BB-66)
50:USS Kentucky (BB-66)
106:
97:
42:
114:
113:
109:
108:
107:
105:
104:
103:
102:
93:
53:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
112:
110:
101:
100:
85:
52:
47:
46:
45:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
111:
99:
96:
91:
86:
84:
81:
77:
73:
72:
71:
70:
66:
62:
58:
51:
48:
44:
41:
36:
31:
30:
23:
19:
94:
87:
54:
39:
32:
22:Assessment
61:TomStar81
20: |
90:archive
35:archive
80:MBK004
16:<
65:Talk
92:.
67:)
37:.
78:-
63:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.