Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Squash/Assessment - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

750: 526: 1083: 31: 1017: 212:
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the
1044:. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a 255:
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their
1571:
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or
266:
below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process that must be followed; this is documented in the
219:
Any member of the WikiProject Squash is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural
1665:
Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is
817:(a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. 179:
to prepare for static releases of Knowledge (XXG) content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Knowledge (XXG) as a
1560:
The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial
1530:
A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the
1469: 1049: 234:
below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process that must be followed; this is documented in the
1661:
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are
149: 963: 995:
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
1212:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); 1026:
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
1209: 1511: 1130: 1637:
should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
1158: 936: 283:
If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the
1411: 1034: 114: 175:
The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the
163: 131:
program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
1725:
reader of Knowledge (XXG) needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater
1344: 561:
exemplifies Knowledge (XXG)'s very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the
106: 73: 1162: 1154: 998:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
959: 951: 731:
No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.
277:
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
1479: 1428: 1146: 708: 652: 493: 1045: 967: 540: 1378:
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.
68: 1841:
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
1536: 1503: 1489: 932: 704: 551: 1364: 1101: 764: 688: 430: 1442: 54: 1729:
notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to the Squash sport.
458: 440: 145: 1817:
This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
1611:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
1150: 775: 1415: 1284: 1097: 1057:
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.
606: 1765: 450: 410: 390: 1232: 1220: 1803: 1784: 1746: 1721:
meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the
420: 400: 1856:
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
1516:
It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and
1336: 1041: 1692: 1451: 851:, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. 633: 284: 101: 94: 87: 49: 17: 1688: 1382: 558: 536: 1695:, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. 1600: 291:
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
1634: 1527:
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
1438: 1348: 1201: 928: 920: 829: 700: 696: 562: 1682: 1653: 486: 1532: 1493: 1432: 1205: 1142: 882: 848: 642: 619:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
311: 203: 190: 138: 760: 672: 123:
of the Squash WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about the
1798:
This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
1704: 1087: 754: 530: 1851:
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
1340: 1271: 1175: 1111: 718: 692: 592: 588: 1555: 1401: 1021: 1299: 1259: 798: 616: 596: 986:
and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
525: 1061: 749: 479: 1605:
An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
1236: 629: 624: 1577:
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
983: 924: 449:(for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to 868: 1879: 1760:
This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
1581: 1562: 1016: 901: 1772: 1701:
Lists should be lists of live links to Knowledge (XXG) articles, appropriately named and organized.
1698:
There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
1414:. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach 1321: 1317: 916: 833: 825: 684: 1810: 1791: 1753: 1360: 1466:
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
1325: 209:
template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?
1874: 1457: 955: 671:: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see 1191: 1779:
This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
1190:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
655:
that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
1488:
The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be
1472:, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. 844: 176: 144:
project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of
128: 1060:
Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.
728:
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.
1288:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 1623:
Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
1446: 1040:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in
587:: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are 864: 662: 1830:
This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.
1381:
Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing
1048:. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. 717:
It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses
230:
and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the
115:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Squash articles by quality statistics
1482:
and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
30: 1658:
A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.
1517: 897: 675:
for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
919:
and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Knowledge (XXG)'s
1506:
etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
581:: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; 1478:
Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a
1298:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 1270:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
801:
that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
1385:
on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
134:
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the
763:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
539:
status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from
124: 565:
for all Knowledge (XXG) articles, it has the following attributes.
1630:
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.
1580:
Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve
1445:
is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of
843:(c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for 1502:
Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an
1468:
It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an
1100:, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from 457:
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in
127:
sport. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the
966:
are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize
1500:
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
834:
four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations
661:: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical 29: 1617:
Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
1731: 1670: 1641: 1588: 1543: 1441:, and any important or controversial material which is 1389: 1068: 1002: 735: 575:: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; 1620:
A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
196:
to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
1717:
The criteria used for rating article importance are
863:
It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful,
242:
6. Can I request that someone else rate an article?
904:; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. 896:It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, 687:and other media, where appropriate, with succinct 1131:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 461:. The class should be assigned according to the 1518:technical terms should be explained or avoided 1003:List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events 933:criteria for the inclusion of non-free content 787:It features professional standards of writing. 299:An article's assessment is generated from the 280:10. What if I have a question not listed here? 252:7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 183:2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 172:1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? 487: 8: 268: 263: 246: 236: 231: 245:Of course; to do so, please list it in the 705:criteria for inclusion of non-free content 502: 494: 480: 474:WikiProject article quality grading scheme 378:The following values may be used for the 1496:does not need to be followed rigorously. 523: 148:, which serves as the foundation for an 1510:The article presents its content in an 1486:The article is reasonably well-written. 1014: 259:8. What if I don't agree with a rating? 595:and are supported by inline citations 747: 7: 1490:of the standard of featured articles 1476:The article has a defined structure. 1082: 1080: 431:Category:Start-Class Squash articles 1133:; spelling and grammar are correct; 1042:Knowledge (XXG):Article development 931:images and other media satisfy the 459:Category:Unassessed Squash articles 441:Category:Stub-Class Squash articles 146:Category:Squash articles by quality 625:Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy 462: 227: 24: 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Squash 1129:the prose is clear, concise, and 982:It is not the subject of ongoing 703:images or media must satisfy the 451:Category:NA-Class Squash articles 411:Category:GA-Class Squash articles 391:Category:FA-Class Squash articles 317:project banner on its talk page: 274:9. Aren't the ratings subjective? 1512:appropriately understandable way 1081: 1015: 748: 645:, including the provision of: 524: 421:Category:B-Class Squash articles 401:Category:A-Class Squash articles 150:automatically generated worklist 615:: it is not subject to ongoing 264:section for assessment requests 247:section for assessment requests 61: 1210:could reasonably be challenged 541:WP:Featured article candidates 1: 1345:valid non-free use rationales 960:Bulleted and unbulleted lists 62:Article Assessment Statistics 1824: 1807: 1788: 1769: 1750: 1050:WikiProject Military history 885:and its supplementary pages. 285:main project discussion page 223:5. How do I rate an article? 1614:A useful picture or graphic 1102:WP:Good article nominations 832:if they contain any of the 765:WP:Featured list candidates 693:acceptable copyright status 216:4. Who can assess articles? 177:Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 program 1897: 1705:List of literary movements 1192:the layout style guideline 1046:featured article candidate 563:policies regarding content 156:Frequently asked questions 956:accessible to all readers 849:content-forking guideline 826:sourced where they appear 759:The article has attained 552:featured article criteria 535:The article has attained 517: 514: 511: 508: 505: 105: 100: 79: 72: 67: 53: 48: 41: 28: 1837:Requesting an assessment 1687:Meets the criteria of a 1633:Providing references to 1390:Discovery of the neutron 319: 1443:likely to be challenged 1363:to the topic, and have 937:are labeled accordingly 847:; does not violate the 607:fairly and without bias 269:assessment instructions 262:You can list it in the 237:assessment instructions 1671:Lineage (anthropology) 1647:(as of September 2014) 1608:More detailed criteria 1568:More detailed criteria 1421:More detailed criteria 1416:good article standards 1107:More detailed criteria 1032:The article meets the 1029:More detailed criteria 968:alternative (alt) text 776:featured list criteria 773:The article meets the 770:More detailed criteria 709:be labeled accordingly 634:too-close paraphrasing 549:The article meets the 546:More detailed criteria 164:general assessment FAQ 34: 1676:(as of December 2014) 1249:Broad in its coverage 1141:it complies with the 1098:good article criteria 952:uses proper formating 881:It complies with the 659:appropriate structure 591:against high-quality 121:assessment department 33: 1549:(as of January 2024) 1233:copyright violations 1221:no original research 1181:no original research 695:. Images follow the 669:consistent citations 605:: it presents views 1429:suitably referenced 1302:or content dispute. 1208:. All content that 1069:Battle of Nam River 828:, and they provide 824:(b) statements are 797:It has an engaging 515:Editing suggestions 512:Reader's experience 37:WikiProject Squash 1863:September 20, 2024 1741:Meaning of Status 1452:citation templates 1406:The article meets 1395:(as of April 2019) 1341:copyright statuses 1312:, if possible, by 1163:list incorporation 1092:The article meets 809:Comprehensiveness. 721:where appropriate. 439:(adds articles to 429:(adds articles to 419:(adds articles to 409:(adds articles to 399:(adds articles to 389:(adds articles to 325:WikiProject Squash 312:WikiProject Squash 307:parameters in the 204:WikiProject Squash 191:WikiProject Squash 139:WikiProject Squash 35: 1834: 1833: 1710: 1709: 1693:set index article 1594:(as of June 2018) 1365:suitable captions 1347:are provided for 1258:it addresses the 1074:(as of June 2014) 845:stand-alone lists 741:(as of June 2018) 597:where appropriate 199:3. Someone put a 112: 111: 1888: 1732: 1713:Importance scale 1689:stand-alone list 1677: 1673: 1648: 1644: 1635:reliable sources 1595: 1591: 1550: 1546: 1537:style guidelines 1461: 1439:reliable sources 1433:inline citations 1412:B-Class criteria 1396: 1392: 1383:featured article 1369: 1368: 1353: 1352: 1349:non-free content 1330: 1329: 1304: 1303: 1290: 1289: 1276: 1275: 1264: 1263: 1253: 1252: 1241: 1240: 1225: 1224: 1214: 1213: 1202:reliable sources 1196: 1195: 1185: 1184: 1167: 1166: 1135: 1134: 1124: 1123: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1075: 1071: 1035:A-Class criteria 1020: 1019: 1009: 1008:(as of May 2018) 1005: 988: 987: 972: 971: 941: 940: 923:, with succinct 906: 905: 887: 886: 873: 872: 853: 852: 838: 837: 830:inline citations 819: 818: 812: 811: 803: 802: 789: 788: 753: 752: 742: 738: 697:image use policy 663:section headings 643:style guidelines 593:reliable sources 559:featured article 537:featured article 529: 528: 503: 496: 489: 482: 374: 371: 368: 365: 362: 359: 356: 353: 350: 347: 344: 341: 338: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 316: 310: 208: 202: 195: 189: 143: 137: 26: 25: 1896: 1895: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1870: 1865: 1847: 1839: 1715: 1675: 1669: 1646: 1640: 1627: 1626: 1609: 1593: 1587: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1548: 1542: 1533:Manual of Style 1524: 1523: 1520:where possible. 1494:Manual of Style 1470:A-Class article 1455: 1427:The article is 1422: 1394: 1388: 1375: 1374: 1358: 1357: 1334: 1333: 1308: 1307: 1294: 1293: 1282: 1281: 1269: 1268: 1257: 1256: 1247: 1246: 1231:it contains no 1230: 1229: 1218: 1217: 1200: 1199: 1189: 1188: 1173: 1172: 1145:guidelines for 1143:Manual of Style 1140: 1139: 1128: 1127: 1118: 1117: 1108: 1073: 1067: 1054: 1053: 1030: 1007: 1001: 992: 991: 978: 977: 945: 944: 910: 909: 891: 890: 883:Manual of Style 877: 876: 859: 858: 842: 841: 823: 822: 816: 815: 807: 806: 793: 792: 783: 782: 771: 740: 734: 725: 724: 641:It follows the 623:compliant with 585:well-researched 547: 501: 500: 471: 376: 375: 372: 369: 366: 363: 360: 357: 354: 351: 348: 345: 342: 339: 336: 333: 330: 327: 324: 321: 314: 308: 297: 206: 200: 193: 187: 158: 141: 135: 119:Welcome to the 117: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1894: 1892: 1884: 1883: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1854: 1853: 1846: 1845:Assessment log 1843: 1838: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1828: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1815: 1806: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1787: 1781: 1780: 1777: 1768: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1749: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1707: 1702: 1699: 1696: 1685: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1656: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1638: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1585: 1578: 1575: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1558: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1540: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1507: 1497: 1483: 1473: 1463: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1404: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1386: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1355: 1305: 1291: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1266: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1227: 1215: 1197: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1155:words to watch 1137: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1090: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1065: 1062:WP:Peer review 1058: 1055: 1039: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1011: 1010: 1006: 999: 996: 993: 990: 989: 975: 974: 973: 942: 921:usage policies 907: 894:Visual appeal. 874: 856: 855: 854: 839: 820: 804: 790: 772: 769: 768: 757: 744: 743: 739: 732: 729: 726: 723: 722: 712: 678: 677: 676: 673:citing sources 666: 656: 639: 638: 637: 620: 610: 600: 582: 576: 548: 545: 544: 533: 520: 519: 516: 513: 510: 507: 499: 498: 491: 484: 476: 472: 470: 467: 455: 454: 444: 434: 424: 414: 404: 394: 320: 296: 293: 289: 288: 281: 278: 275: 272: 260: 257: 253: 250: 243: 240: 224: 221: 217: 214: 210: 197: 184: 181: 173: 169: 168: 157: 154: 113: 110: 109: 104: 98: 97: 91: 90: 84: 83: 77: 76: 71: 65: 64: 58: 57: 52: 46: 45: 39: 38: 36: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1893: 1881: 1877: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1867: 1862: 1860: 1857: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1842: 1836: 1829: 1827: 1821: 1820: 1816: 1814: 1812: 1805: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1795: 1793: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1776: 1774: 1767: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1757: 1755: 1748: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1737: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1712: 1706: 1703: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1680: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1657: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1643: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1579: 1576: 1564: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1553: 1545: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1529: 1526: 1519: 1515: 1513: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1459: 1453: 1449: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1434: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1391: 1387: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1366: 1362: 1356: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1332: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1306: 1301: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1286: 1280: 1273: 1272:summary style 1267: 1262:of the topic; 1261: 1255: 1254: 1250: 1245: 1238: 1234: 1228: 1222: 1216: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1193: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1171: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147:lead sections 1144: 1138: 1132: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1089: 1079: 1078: 1070: 1066: 1063: 1059: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1037: 1036: 1025: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1012: 1004: 1000: 997: 994: 985: 981: 976: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 948:Accessibility 943: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 908: 903: 899: 895: 889: 888: 884: 880: 875: 870: 867:headings and 866: 862: 857: 850: 846: 840: 835: 831: 827: 821: 814: 813: 810: 805: 800: 796: 791: 786: 781: 780: 778: 777: 766: 762: 761:featured list 758: 756: 751: 746: 745: 737: 733: 730: 727: 720: 719:summary style 716: 713: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 679: 674: 670: 667: 664: 660: 657: 654: 650: 647: 646: 644: 640: 635: 631: 627: 626: 621: 618: 614: 611: 608: 604: 601: 598: 594: 590: 586: 583: 580: 579:comprehensive 577: 574: 571: 570: 568: 567: 566: 564: 560: 554: 553: 542: 538: 534: 532: 527: 522: 521: 504: 497: 492: 490: 485: 483: 478: 477: 475: 469:Quality scale 468: 466: 464: 463:quality scale 460: 452: 448: 445: 442: 438: 435: 432: 428: 425: 422: 418: 415: 412: 408: 405: 402: 398: 395: 392: 388: 385: 384: 383: 381: 367:needs-infobox 318: 313: 306: 302: 294: 292: 286: 282: 279: 276: 273: 270: 265: 261: 258: 254: 251: 248: 244: 241: 238: 233: 229: 228:quality scale 225: 222: 218: 215: 211: 205: 198: 192: 185: 182: 178: 174: 171: 170: 167: 165: 162:See also the 160: 159: 155: 153: 151: 147: 140: 132: 130: 126: 122: 116: 108: 103: 99: 96: 93: 92: 89: 86: 85: 82: 78: 75: 70: 66: 63: 60: 59: 56: 51: 47: 44: 40: 32: 27: 19: 1873: 1858: 1855: 1850: 1840: 1825: 1808: 1789: 1770: 1751: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1716: 1666:significant. 1662:significant. 1535:and related 1509: 1499: 1485: 1480:lead section 1475: 1465: 1462:is optional. 1447:<ref: --> 1426: 1407: 1313: 1309: 1295: 1283: 1260:main aspects 1248: 1219:it contains 1206:cited inline 1180: 1174: 1120:Well-written 1119: 1112:good article 1093: 1033: 979: 947: 913:Media files. 912: 893: 878: 860: 808: 794: 784: 774: 714: 680: 668: 658: 653:lead section 651:: a concise 648: 628:and free of 622: 612: 602: 584: 578: 573:well-written 572: 556: 550: 473: 456: 446: 436: 426: 416: 406: 396: 386: 379: 377: 304: 300: 298: 295:Instructions 290: 232:instructions 161: 133: 120: 118: 80: 50:Main project 42: 1339:with their 1310:Illustrated 871:facilities. 382:parameter: 1882:) removed. 1773:High-Class 1544:Psychology 1359:media are 1335:media are 1237:plagiarism 1176:Verifiable 980:Stability. 869:table sort 861:Structure. 630:plagiarism 589:verifiable 340:importance 305:importance 256:reasoning. 226:Check the 95:Categories 88:To-Do List 43:Main pages 1875:Squash TV 1811:Low-Class 1792:Mid-Class 1754:Top-Class 1738:Template 1584:problems. 1064:may help. 984:edit wars 736:Cleopatra 617:edit wars 569:It is: 358:attention 220:disputes. 213:article). 186:Just add 1458:cite web 1454:such as 1361:relevant 1316:such as 1300:edit war 929:Non-free 925:captions 701:Non-free 689:captions 518:Example 509:Criteria 102:Template 1868:Removed 1735:Status 1727:popular 1723:average 1582:cleanup 1563:cleanup 1504:infobox 1437:It has 1431:, with 1410:of the 1285:Neutral 1159:fiction 1096:of the 915:It has 865:section 715:Length. 683:It has 603:neutral 465:below. 69:Userbox 1492:. The 1343:, and 1337:tagged 1318:images 1296:Stable 1161:, and 1151:layout 964:tables 954:to be 917:images 902:colour 900:, and 898:tables 879:Style. 785:Prose. 685:images 681:Media. 649:a lead 613:stable 249:below. 180:whole. 129:WP:1.0 125:squash 1822:None 1601:Start 1572:flow. 1326:audio 1324:, or 1322:video 1314:media 1179:with 950:. It 795:Lead. 665:; and 506:Class 427:Start 380:class 331:class 301:class 81:Other 16:< 1880:talk 1826:None 1766:High 1683:List 1654:Stub 1642:Ball 1589:Wing 1450:and 1448:tags 1204:are 1114:is: 962:and 946:(c) 935:and 911:(b) 892:(a) 799:lead 707:and 691:and 437:Stub 349:auto 303:and 107:talk 74:talk 55:talk 1804:Low 1785:Mid 1747:Top 1719:not 1691:or 1408:all 1354:and 1265:and 1235:or 1226:and 1136:and 1094:all 632:or 152:. 1813:}} 1809:{{ 1794:}} 1790:{{ 1775:}} 1771:{{ 1756:}} 1752:{{ 1460:}} 1456:{{ 1320:, 1274:). 1157:, 1153:, 1149:, 1110:A 1088:GA 1052:). 958:. 927:. 779:: 755:FL 699:. 557:A 555:: 531:FA 447:NA 407:GA 387:FA 373:}} 322:{{ 315:}} 309:{{ 207:}} 201:{{ 194:}} 188:{{ 142:}} 136:{{ 1878:( 1565:. 1556:C 1539:. 1514:. 1435:. 1418:. 1402:B 1367:. 1351:; 1328:: 1251:: 1239:. 1223:; 1194:; 1183:: 1165:. 1122:: 1104:. 1038:: 1022:A 970:. 939:. 836:. 767:. 711:. 636:. 609:; 599:; 543:. 495:e 488:t 481:v 453:) 443:) 433:) 423:) 417:B 413:) 403:) 397:A 393:) 370:= 364:| 361:= 355:| 352:= 346:| 343:= 337:| 334:= 328:| 287:. 271:. 239:. 166:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Squash

Main project
talk
Article Assessment Statistics
Userbox
talk
To-Do List
Categories
Template
talk
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Squash articles by quality statistics
squash
WP:1.0
WikiProject Squash
Category:Squash articles by quality
automatically generated worklist
general assessment FAQ
Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 program
WikiProject Squash
WikiProject Squash
quality scale
instructions
assessment instructions
section for assessment requests
section for assessment requests
assessment instructions
main project discussion page
WikiProject Squash
Category:FA-Class Squash articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑