241:
any way as the
Foundation's legal counsel) brokered an agreement between David and the Committee that the statement should be removed entirely to avoid the possibility of further needless harm, as sufficient to all involved to resolve the matter. ... The reason why I am now stepping out of line and providing this statement — which I hope will help comprehension without causing further drama —is because the continuing speculation about the motives behind the suppression undermine the resolution of the incident and cause undue strife within the project.
290:
that seemed to me to have gone off the rails, at least in some respects, and at nobody's request but my own, I spoke out about it, and ultimately was asked to try to mediate a resolution, which I then did. The goal was not to erase history (I'm not as stupid as I look), but simply to remove Arbcom's seal of approval on some problematic statements while at the same time preserving Arbcom's prerogatives and authority". However, some users took issue with his possible interference with the committee;
728:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
860:
We came to the story late in the publication process and it was hard to nail that area down. I almost inserted the question from John
Vandenberg, but the story was already growing so large and there were already issues with the linking to the blog that were eating into time that could have been spent
240:
A few days ago, the
Committee made an announcement on its noticeboard relating to the advanced permissions of David Gerard ... David Gerard expressed objections to the nature of the announcement ... In the day following, Mike Godwin (acting, it is important to note, in his private capacity and not in
880:
What fresh madness is this? It's a copyright violation to link to the original version of copyrighted material? Like, it's a copyright violation to link to a New York Times story because the story is copyrighted? This sort of insanity needs to be quashed before it becomes impossible to contribute
418:
felt that the policy was "unenforceable", and three-quarters also believed the policy to be "too lenient" (and the relevant language has changed very little since then). To gauge whether those sentiments have changed, recent contributors to the
Civility talk page were asked about their reactions to
289:
sent several emails to the ArbCom mailing list, expressing concern with the committee's decision on legal grounds: "My strong suggestion is that ArbCom reconsider its decisions, which seem more like arbitrariness than arbitration." Explaining his involvement, Godwin noted he "came across a process
212:
speculated: "The announcement they suppressed contained an HTML link to an off-wiki page containing an email apparently published without its sender's permission and the IP details of the specific identified sender. It was the off-wiki posting of that information which motivated stripping David
896:
No, the issue was about linking to sites that reproduce copyrighted material without permission (the email that David Gerard posted). So links to pages that simply reproduce New York Times articles without permission are disallowed, not links to the original
915:
Hahaha, ah yes, I see, so I can write you an email and call you all sorts of names, and if you share the email you'd be violating my copyright? I misunderstood the circumstances but sadly the question of whether this is insanity or idiocy remains.
258:
later that day at 20:22 UTC. The statement made clear that "this suppression was the desire of David Gerard, who felt defamed by the comments, and it is proper under the oversight policy". The new statement has the approval of both David Gerard and
460:
After we cover all the conduct policy pages in the coming weeks, perhaps techniques used to enlighten and resolve conflict on those talk pages, which have been surprisingly successful, can be applied when we take another look at
570:
294:
felt that "This holding up hands and saying 'Hey, I was just sending emails, it was nothing official.' doesn't wash since there was no way for the ArbCom to determine that you were not giving them official direction."
823:
844:
Re: "Nothing to see here" doesn't mention that one of the much-discussed questions concerning the episode was whether or not David Gerard had requested
Foundation intervention with the ArbCom over the matter.
478:
666:
787:
275:, whose recusal from the incident had also been suppressed, reiterated their position in an addendum. When asked to clarify the original nature of the recusal, now lost due to the suppression, Carcharoth
482:
792:
429:
pointed to the August poll as evidence that a small minority of editors completely ignore our civility policy while continuing to make useful contributions, and there is no easy fix for this problem.
797:
715:
706:
392:
752:
762:
772:
73:
217:
201:
268:
777:
347:
315:
433:
feels that the good editors are usually not very good at dealing with the bullies, and that we need to expect more professionalism from every contributor as
Knowledge (XXG) matures.
267:, poster of the original statement, resigned his seat from the committee, stating "This situation was avoidable, and I apologise for the way that I handled this." The vast majority of
941:
862:
767:
757:
739:
52:
41:
606:
600:
504:
576:
498:
457:, on the other hand, deplores the "politeness police" who fail to recognize the benefits of the kinds of free speech guaranteed by most modern industrialized nations.
861:
writing it. If you note, I only realised John resigned over the issue at the 11th hour. Other editors are free to write this stuff up as well or make suggestions at
494:
994:
636:
251:
208:
on
December 2 at 00:22 UTC. MzMcBride was unable to "imagine the levels of stupidity required to think this was a good idea to try to un-ring such a loud bell".
341:
on the afternoon of 3 December, reading simply: "I love everyone. I suggest you all go write something. Assume better faith too. Be excellent to one another."
21:
404:
969:
964:
959:
363:. There are eight conduct policies left after last month's re-categorization discussions, and most of these policies have become more stable over time:
745:
954:
525:
489:. The debate hinges on the notability of the site itself, with editors discussing the relevance of previous outcomes regarding this article.
618:
306:"ArbCom's original issue appears to have been my tweet as quoted within the blog post." However, posting of a link to Gerard's post by
582:
684:
388:
949:
727:
588:
46:
32:
17:
556:
538:
466:
375:
have cooled down (although without consensus on how to edit policies and guidelines themselves). Consensus was largely forged at
450:
445:
policy, which might be confusing and unexpected for people used to the anything-goes culture prevalent on the internet, and our
376:
330:. Consensus during the debate at the Clerk's sub-page was that the link was not in violation of the policy, although Gerard had
197:. Gerard's talk page has also seen some revisions oversighted. The suppressions provoked a strong reaction from Wikipedians.
299:
190:
271:
have urged
Vandenberg to reconsider, although the former arbitrator shows no signs of acceding to those wishes. Arbitrator
925:
906:
890:
874:
854:
243:
391:
tends to gain and then lose examples of "ownership" in cycles, the basic proscriptions have remained stable. A previous
236:
400:
372:
279:: "I recused myself from the original motion that was voted on, and chose not give on-wiki my reasons for recusal."
612:
437:
points to a potential reason the
Civility policy has been slow to change: objections might be regarded as uncivil.
648:
518:
420:
415:
396:
564:
371:
largely concern basic principles of editing that are hard to disagree with, and the formerly heated arguments at
368:
975:
696:
514:
446:
672:
654:
624:
364:
186:
594:
174:
442:
411:
264:
319:
426:
307:
209:
921:
902:
886:
434:
334:
observed that a "claim of copyright violation is not something that is determined by consensus".
90:
819:
678:
510:
255:
178:
120:
870:
630:
260:
544:
360:
100:
850:
454:
430:
283:
272:
220:
has way more interest in drama than writing an encyclopedia. I've started adding bits of
182:
130:
642:
221:
205:
988:
917:
898:
882:
690:
438:
291:
158:
486:
181:. The hidden revisions were related to the removal of David Gerard's access to the
110:
224:, it's fun!" Attempting to draw the heat from the discussion, serving arbitrator
140:
866:
660:
524:
The too long, didn't read award this week goes to the deletion debate regarding
380:
327:
286:
150:
846:
465:
in late
January. Next week's Policy Report will include discussions from the
225:
154:
462:
337:
Gerard has resigned his Checkuser and Oversight permissions. He issued a
216:
Gerard wrote on his talk page at 10:20 UTC that "anyone participating in
571:
Talk:List of pre-Stonewall American television episodes with LGBT themes
414:
page is another story. Three-quarters of the respondents in August's
503:
Unusually, a disambiguation page is being considered for deletion at
667:
Knowledge (XXG):British Isles Terminology task force/Channel Islands
539:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style#Use of endash in article titles
359:
This month and next, the Policy Report will cover Knowledge (XXG)'s
483:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Google Watch (4th nomination)
318:
as to whether the posting of the link violated policies regarding
194:
51:
233:
863:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions
726:
543:
Discussion regarding when to relist deletion debates at the
521:
are proving contentious in their respective deletion debates
31:
537:
Discussion over the use of the endash in article titles at
559:
have been made in the week of 30 November to 06 December:
250:
The suppression was formally announced on the committee's
302:
remains fully available on Gerard's personal website; he
607:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Elections and Referenda
395:
detailed the recent resolution of a number of issues at
835:
828:
808:
485:
sees a fifth deletion discussion regarding the website
384:
338:
331:
323:
311:
303:
276:
228:, writing in a personal capacity at 15:57 UTC, stated:
170:
505:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Downtown Norwich
218:
that thread at the arbitration committee's noticeboard
499:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rachel Uchitel
493:
Tiger Woods is creating drama on Knowledge (XXG) at
453:policies, which probably don't come as a surprise.
383:
for pointing out the discussions); the page has had
833:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
601:
Talk:Zeitgeschichtliche Forschungsstelle Ingolstadt
495:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jaimee Grubbs
577:Talk:Centrifugal force (rotating reference frame)
68:Discussion Report And Miscellaneous Articulations
637:Talk:List of male performers in gay porn films
8:
995:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2009-12
619:Knowledge (XXG) talk:No personal attacks
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
836:
812:
67:
685:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)
7:
405:reshuffling of the material in July
53:
28:
818:These comments are automatically
589:Talk:List of alleged alien beings
379:in late November 2007 (thanks to
441:draws a distinction between our
193:obtained using Checkuser to his
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
942:putting together the next issue
189:tools, after he was accused of
169:The arbitration committee have
829:add the page to your watchlist
583:Talk:2009 Honduran coup d'état
1:
926:03:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
907:03:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
891:03:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
875:15:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
855:00:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
204:at the Audit Subcommittee by
173:a recent statement regarding
316:administrator's noticeboard
1011:
649:Category talk:Somali clans
519:Template:Lists of Russians
312:request for a clerk review
565:Talk:Eurasian Land Bridge
697:Template talk:Refimprove
419:our current policy, and
403:has been stable since a
385:surprisingly few changes
515:File:Sailor Mercury.jpg
298:The controversial blog
213:Gerard of his rights."
191:posting private content
826:. To follow comments,
731:
673:Talk:Jewish Bolshevism
625:Template talk:Cite web
477:After the deletion of
387:since then. Although
314:and discussion at the
254:by serving arbitrator
177:and former arbitrator
36:
730:
719:"Discussion report" →
595:Talk:Miami Boys Choir
526:Mohammad Shamsul Alam
479:Knowledge (XXG) Watch
389:Ownership of articles
35:
822:from this article's
557:Requests for comment
551:Requests for comment
788:Features and admins
711:"Discussion report"
655:Talk:Émile Durkheim
451:No personal attacks
377:No personal attacks
165:Nothing to see here
813:Discuss this story
793:Arbitration report
732:
42:← Back to Contents
37:
873:
837:purging the cache
798:Technology report
783:Discussion report
679:Talk:UFO religion
511:Fix it again Tony
473:Deletion round-up
248:
247:
200:A discussion was
65:Discussion report
47:View Latest Issue
1002:
978:
940:needs your help
869:
840:
838:
832:
811:
753:From the editors
750:
742:
735:
718:
710:
631:Talk:Lucas Neill
613:Talk:Rae Carruth
481:on November 27,
361:Conduct policies
234:
175:UK press contact
161:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1001:
1000:
999:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
974:
972:
967:
962:
957:
952:
945:
934:
933:
842:
834:
827:
816:
815:
809:+ Add a comment
807:
803:
802:
801:
763:Election report
743:
740:7 December 2009
738:
736:
733:
722:
721:
716:
713:
708:
702:
553:
534:
475:
467:Username policy
423:are revealing.
421:their responses
401:Username policy
357:
284:general counsel
265:John Vandenberg
167:
162:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
54:7 December 2009
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1008:
1006:
998:
997:
987:
986:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
947:
946:
936:
935:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
910:
909:
878:
877:
817:
814:
806:
805:
804:
800:
795:
790:
785:
780:
775:
773:News and notes
770:
765:
760:
755:
749:
737:
725:
724:
723:
714:
705:
704:
703:
701:
700:
694:
688:
682:
676:
670:
664:
658:
652:
646:
643:Talk:Goatse.cx
640:
634:
628:
622:
616:
610:
604:
598:
592:
586:
580:
574:
568:
561:
552:
549:
548:
547:
541:
533:
530:
529:
528:
522:
507:
501:
474:
471:
427:NuclearWarfare
373:Editing policy
356:
353:
352:
351:
308:Privatemusings
246:
245:
242:
238:
231:
210:Dragons flight
166:
163:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1007:
996:
993:
992:
990:
977:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
943:
939:
927:
923:
919:
914:
913:
912:
911:
908:
904:
900:
895:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
876:
872:
868:
864:
859:
858:
857:
856:
852:
848:
839:
830:
825:
821:
810:
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
754:
751:
747:
741:
734:In this issue
729:
720:
712:
698:
695:
692:
691:Talk:Chazante
689:
686:
683:
680:
677:
674:
671:
668:
665:
662:
659:
656:
653:
650:
647:
644:
641:
638:
635:
632:
629:
626:
623:
620:
617:
614:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
587:
584:
581:
578:
575:
572:
569:
566:
563:
562:
560:
558:
555:Twenty-three
550:
546:
542:
540:
536:
535:
531:
527:
523:
520:
516:
512:
508:
506:
502:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
488:
484:
480:
472:
470:
468:
464:
458:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
435:Proofreader77
432:
428:
424:
422:
417:
416:Civility Poll
413:
408:
406:
402:
398:
397:Sock puppetry
394:
393:Policy Report
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
355:Policy Report
354:
350:
349:
344:
343:
342:
340:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
296:
293:
288:
285:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:. Arbitrator
262:
257:
253:
239:
235:
232:
229:
227:
223:
219:
214:
211:
207:
203:
198:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
164:
160:
156:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
938:The Signpost
937:
879:
843:
782:
746:all comments
554:
545:village pump
487:Google Watch
476:
459:
425:
409:
399:, while our
369:Edit warring
358:
345:
336:
297:
282:Wikimedia's
281:
256:Roger Davies
249:
230:
215:
199:
179:David Gerard
168:
976:Suggestions
820:transcluded
778:In the news
699:30 November
693:30 November
661:Talk:Hesiod
469:talk page.
348:In the news
287:Mike Godwin
269:respondents
261:Mike Godwin
252:noticeboard
195:public blog
897:stories.--
687:1 December
681:1 December
675:1 December
669:1 December
663:1 December
657:1 December
651:2 December
645:2 December
639:3 December
633:3 December
627:4 December
621:4 December
615:4 December
609:4 December
603:4 December
597:4 December
591:4 December
585:5 December
579:5 December
573:6 December
567:6 December
455:Camelbinky
447:Harassment
431:Tryptofish
346:See also:
332:previously
273:Carcharoth
171:suppressed
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2009-12-07
970:Subscribe
824:talk page
768:Interview
758:Editorial
509:Redirect
365:Consensus
339:statement
324:assertion
320:copyright
310:led to a
206:MZMcBride
202:initiated
187:Oversight
183:Checkuser
989:Category
965:Newsroom
960:Archives
918:JayHenry
899:ragesoss
883:JayHenry
881:here. --
709:Previous
463:Civility
443:Civility
439:Johnuniq
412:Civility
326:made by
304:believes
292:Barberio
159:Pretzels
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
532:Briefly
111:Twitter
867:Hiding
381:Risker
328:Durova
277:stated
157:, and
151:Hiding
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
955:About
847:Cla68
322:, an
226:Coren
222:video
16:<
950:Home
922:talk
903:talk
887:talk
851:talk
717:Next
517:and
497:and
449:and
410:The
367:and
300:post
185:and
155:Dank
141:Digg
149:By
76:—
991::
924:)
916:--
905:)
889:)
865:.
853:)
707:←
513:,
407:.
244:”
237:“
153:,
944:.
920:(
901:(
885:(
871:T
849:(
841:.
831:.
748:)
744:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
