541:
117:
107:
33:
127:
373:
finding that (1) some aspect of the discussion was procedurally unfair, (2) the sanction imposed appears to be significantly excessive or overbroad, (3) circumstances have changed significantly since the sanction was imposed, or (4) non-public information that should not be addressed on-wiki, such as personal information or checkuser data, is relevant to the decision.
87:
137:
97:
455:
interest or expertise in a topic. Editors are considered to have a conflict of interest if they contribute to
Knowledge (XXG) in order to promote their own interests, or those of other individuals or groups, and if advancing those interests is more important to them than advancing the aims of Knowledge (XXG).
372:
of articles by engaging in sustained aggressive point-of-view editing may be subject to bans, either by community consensus or by the
Committee. While the Committee is permitted to lessen the effect of a Community sanction, such action is relatively rare, and would be based on good cause such as a
454:
Affiliation with the
Gerontology Research Group, or any other group named in the evidence to the case, does not in itself constitute a conflict of interest when editing the longevity topics. Similarly, editors do not have a conflict of interest merely because they have personal or professional
311:. The Committee has instructed that such sanctions should be administered in such a fashion as to treat all contributors fairly, while, at the same time, ensuring that future editing of the pages adheres to high standards of both Knowledge (XXG) behavior and Shakespearean scholarship.
642:
I believe the clause above "including founder of
Knowledge (XXG) ..." should instead read "including co-founder of Knowledge (XXG) ...". What is the etiquette for such a revision to the main article? (please note, before
506:
690:
Major or substantive edits are usually not approved, but it's fine to fix typos and so on (particularly as the typo in this instance resulted in an meaning that was not desired or intended by the authors). Thank you.
204:
621:
585:
476:
was urged to seek experienced
Knowledge (XXG) editors who will act as mentors to the WikiProject and assist its members: in improving their understanding of Knowledge (XXG) norms and editing of Knowledge
401:
submitted a proposed decision in the workshop, before it was submitted for arbitrators to vote on. The case came to a close during the week, after a total of 11 arbitrators voted on the proposed decision.
580:
528:
519:
492:
391:
265:
595:
565:
73:
488:
416:
308:
173:
570:
558:
575:
552:
52:
41:
459:
378:
505:
was also made; the
Committee seeks to appoint at least three non-arbitrator members to AUSC. Applications will close on 7 March 2011. Further information about the
473:
793:
462:
to decide the outcome of content disputes. Whether or not any individual longevity-related topic is within
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability policies is a question for
186:
502:
21:
466:. Whether or not materials produced by the Gerontology Research Group and affiliated groups are within Knowledge (XXG)'s sourcing policies is a question for
768:
763:
758:
467:
753:
300:
through practices such as excessive repetition, monopolization, irrelevancy, advocacy, misrepresentation of others' comments, or personal attacks.
390:
articles. Evidence was submitted on-wiki by 12 editors over several weeks after parties requested for additional time to submit evidence (cf.
181:
During the week, 11 editors submitted over 67 kilobytes in on-wiki evidence. One of these editors also submitted several workshop proposals.
448:
286:
357:
463:
161:
748:
540:
227:
46:
32:
17:
369:
194:
During the week, another editor submitted an additional 15 kilobytes in on-wiki evidence. No workshop proposals were submitted.
432:
349:
345:
304:
282:
213:
292:
Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject. Editors should aspire to
737:
720:
700:
685:
671:
656:
325:
241:
386:
The case concerns allegations about problematic conduct, conflicts of interests, notability, and sourcing in relation to
681:
652:
714:
774:
442:
271:). The case came to a close during the week, after a total of 15 arbitrators voted on the proposed decision.
677:
648:
261:
696:
221:
711:
438:
426:
398:
353:
339:
329:
257:
245:
90:
617:
319:
235:
120:
297:
293:
264:
submitted a new principle to work on, which built on the proposals made in the workshop (cf.
692:
249:
217:
150:
644:
100:
667:
216:. Evidence was submitted on-wiki by 27 editors, including co-founder of Knowledge (XXG),
164:
opened no new cases during the week, but closed two cases. Two cases are currently open.
130:
647:, that the designation of "co-founder" is the hard-won usage in many other articles) --
422:
335:
253:
154:
709:
Of course leaving the definite article out leaves wiggle room for those that want it.
787:
328:) on 3 November 2010; Smatprt remains topic-banned from any article which relates to
212:
This case concerns allegations about disruptive editing on articles relating to the
315:
231:
110:
140:
663:
412:
387:
244:) also appealed the Community's restriction which topic-banned Smatprt from
363:
NinaGreen is banned from editing
Knowledge (XXG) until 16 February 2012.
285:
has been dysfunctional for several years; the 21 talk page archives at
68:
Longevity and
Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
348:) is indefinitely topic-banned from any article which relates to the
314:
The
Committee endorsed the Community restriction that was imposed on
256:
did not submit their proposed decision to the workshop, arbitrators
451:) is banned from editing Knowledge (XXG) until 17 February 2012.
51:
289:
reflect a miserable history of talkpage misuse and disruption.
539:
406:
What is the effect of the decision and what does it tell us?
276:
What is the effect of the decision and what does it tell us?
31:
248:
related articles until 3 November 2011. Although drafters
435:) is indefinitely topic-banned from the longevity topic.
633:
626:
606:
733:
Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add
631:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
487:The Committee invited further comments in the
8:
676:Thanks for doing that, accuracy matters. --
468:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources/Noticeboard
794:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2011-02
281:The collaborative editing environment on
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
634:
610:
67:
464:Knowledge (XXG):Notability/Noticeboard
7:
287:Talk:Shakespeare authorship question
358:Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford
662:I changed it to say "co-founder."
491:on Audit Subcommittee (AUSC) (cf.
417:"standard" discretionary sanctions
309:"standard" discretionary sanctions
53:
28:
616:These comments are automatically
509:will be published in next week's
474:WikiProject World's Oldest People
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
350:Shakespeare authorship question
305:Shakespeare authorship question
283:Shakespeare authorship question
214:Shakespeare authorship question
205:Shakespeare authorship question
627:add the page to your watchlist
1:
721:13:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
701:13:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
686:06:17, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
672:05:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
657:01:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
460:not the role of the Committee
810:
294:use talk pages effectively
415:articles are subject to
411:Articles related to the
303:Articles related to the
624:. To follow comments,
544:
532:"Arbitration report" →
332:until 3 November 2011.
36:
738:Signpost-subscription
543:
503:call for applications
35:
620:from this article's
524:"Arbitration report"
230:). During the case,
586:Features and admins
507:appointment process
370:disrupt the editing
354:William Shakespeare
330:William Shakespeare
246:William Shakespeare
611:Discuss this story
591:Arbitration report
581:WikiProject report
545:
174:Monty Hall problem
65:Arbitration report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
724:
635:purging the cache
596:Technology report
262:Elen of the Roads
47:View Latest Issue
801:
777:
742:
736:
719:
678:Seth Finkelstein
649:Seth Finkelstein
638:
636:
630:
609:
563:
555:
553:21 February 2011
548:
531:
523:
402:
272:
195:
182:
157:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
54:21 February 2011
809:
808:
804:
803:
802:
800:
799:
798:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
773:
771:
766:
761:
756:
751:
744:
740:
734:
730:
729:
640:
632:
625:
614:
613:
607:+ Add a comment
605:
601:
600:
599:
556:
551:
549:
546:
535:
534:
529:
526:
521:
484:
385:
383:
307:are subject to
211:
209:
201:
193:
191:
180:
178:
170:
158:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
807:
805:
797:
796:
786:
785:
772:
767:
762:
757:
752:
747:
746:
745:
732:
731:
728:
727:
726:
725:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
645:the inevitable
615:
612:
604:
603:
602:
598:
593:
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
566:News and notes
562:
550:
538:
537:
536:
527:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
499:
483:
480:
479:
478:
471:
456:
452:
439:John J. Bulten
436:
420:
408:
407:
399:Kirill Lokshin
382:
376:
375:
374:
366:
365:
364:
333:
312:
301:
290:
278:
277:
258:Cool Hand Luke
208:
202:
200:
197:
190:
184:
177:
171:
169:
166:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
806:
795:
792:
791:
789:
776:
770:
765:
760:
755:
750:
739:
722:
717:
716:
713:
708:
702:
698:
694:
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
675:
674:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
659:
658:
654:
650:
646:
637:
628:
623:
619:
608:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
560:
554:
547:In this issue
542:
533:
525:
512:
508:
504:
501:Yesterday, a
500:
497:
495:
490:
486:
485:
481:
475:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
447:
444:
440:
437:
434:
431:
428:
424:
421:
418:
414:
410:
409:
405:
404:
403:
400:
396:
394:
389:
380:
377:
371:
367:
362:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
341:
337:
334:
331:
327:
324:
321:
317:
313:
310:
306:
302:
299:
296:and must not
295:
291:
288:
284:
280:
279:
275:
274:
273:
270:
268:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
237:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
206:
203:
198:
196:
188:
185:
183:
175:
172:
167:
165:
163:
156:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
710:
641:
590:
559:all comments
510:
493:
445:
429:
392:
384:
342:
322:
266:
238:
224:
210:
199:Closed cases
192:
179:
159:
775:Suggestions
693:Ncmvocalist
618:transcluded
571:In the news
397:). Drafter
298:misuse them
250:Newyorkbrad
218:Jimbo Wales
151:Ncmvocalist
715:Farmbrough
576:Versailles
368:Users who
168:Open cases
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2011-02-21
769:Subscribe
622:talk page
423:Ryoung122
413:longevity
388:longevity
381:(Week 13)
379:Longevity
336:NinaGreen
254:SirFozzie
162:Committee
155:Lord Roem
788:Category
764:Newsroom
759:Archives
522:Previous
511:Signpost
496:coverage
494:Signpost
449:contribs
433:contribs
395:coverage
393:Signpost
346:contribs
326:contribs
269:coverage
267:Signpost
242:contribs
228:contribs
207:(Week 5)
189:(Week 2)
187:Kehrli 2
176:(Week 2)
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
316:Smatprt
232:Smatprt
111:Twitter
477:(XXG).
458:It is
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
754:About
664:Cla68
482:Other
356:, or
16:<
749:Home
712:Rich
697:talk
682:talk
668:talk
653:talk
530:Next
443:talk
427:talk
340:talk
320:talk
260:and
252:and
236:talk
222:talk
160:The
153:and
141:Digg
489:RfC
149:By
76:—
790::
741:}}
735:{{
718:,
699:)
684:)
670:)
655:)
520:←
498:).
360:.
352:,
743:.
723:.
695:(
680:(
666:(
651:(
639:.
629:.
561:)
557:(
513:.
470:.
446:·
441:(
430:·
425:(
419:.
343:·
338:(
323:·
318:(
239:·
234:(
225:·
220:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
