470:): "I believe that more women would be involved in editing Knowledge (XXG) if it were a social activity, rather than an insular one, so I hosted a WikiWomen party at my house to make the experience collaborative." The dinner followed by cocktails was attended by five female graduate students in chemistry, four of them complete newbies, who after "watching tutorials on YouTube and reading Knowledge (XXG) editing guidelines" felt "somewhat discouraged at first by the long list of rules", but eventually found the activity enjoyable, making the party a success: "It was fun to expose science and our research to others while relaxing with friends". Klemm is inviting women in the San Francisco Bay Area to get together more often for 'WikiWomen' editing events.
391:". The author called Knowledge (XXG) "the bane of the Internet" for disrupting SEO marketers' efforts to promote their own pages for specific search keywords, because Google tends to rank Knowledge (XXG) pages higher. The "14 steps to overthrow a Knowledge (XXG) page" (in favor of one's own pages) include gradually removing wikilinks to it in other Knowledge (XXG) articles, and inserting wrong information, then e-mailing a screenshot of the vandalized revision to webmasters who link to the Knowledge (XXG) article ("Describe how important it is that their readers get reliable information and offer your authoritative page as an alternative").
657:
under discussion, rather than the preceding subject ("This article"). Similarly "This article has (as much claim to evenhandedness == X) (as
Gaddafi's history of Libya == Y)". The construction doesn't require the content of the article to follow the forms and rhetoric of Y, but is drawing a comparison on the attribute. Again, it's not that I agree with him, but it's a perfectly valid English statement in terms of expressing his point. Misreading it makes the Knowledge (XXG) defenders look silly. --
225:) succeeded only in putting on the main page a version that had "as much claim to evenhandedness as does an entry on Libya's history written by Muammar Gaddafi". This claim is fiercely contested; the Knowledge (XXG) article in question itself cites a sharply different judgment from a reliable source that described Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of the authorship controversy as putting "to shame anything that ever appeared in standard resources". The
498:
712:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
1005:
Actually, at least "a sharply different judgment" of
Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage was cited, too. But I agree, it might have been worthwhile to point out more clearly that Anderson's position in the Shakespeare debate is not exactly the most mainstream one (even though the venue in which his criticism
772:
I hope
Dcoetzee is right. And I hope that WebmasterFormat knows that he's playing a sleazeball role with this effort. Of course, if he's one of the many sociopaths of the human species, he won't care; but I hope that he's at least intelligent enough to see that he himself is being a true bane to the
656:
There is a common construction "As much X as Y", where X is an attribute under discussion, and Y is a colorful way of expressing a very small or very large quantity. For example, "This article has (as much) (chance of surviving == X) (as a snowball in Hell == Y)". Here, Y applies to X, the attribute
423:
from U.C. Berkeley of user privacy and tracking reported that "Combined, Google has a presence on 97 of the top 100 websites. This includes popular government websites such as usps.com, irs.gov, and nih.gov. Only microsoft.com, ups.com, and wikipedia.org lacked some type of Google cookie." Knowledge
1048:
article, is that the
Friedmans got their start as cryptologists around 1915 working for an employer who wanted to prove Sir Francis Bacon was the author of most of the plays. In the course of this work, they developed powerful statistical tools that significantly advanced the art of breaking codes.
1043:
Regarding the value of fringe theories in stimulating research, the benefits are not restricted to
Shakespearean scholarship. Our article on SAQ reports that "American cryptologists William and Elizebeth Friedman won the Folger Shakespeare Library Literary Prize in 1955 for a study of the arguments
899:
Not especially apropos of this news piece (I have no position on the
Shakespeare question), but just in general, I really like the thought mentioned above—"Conspiracy theories should be aired, because if they are repressed, they feed the unenlightened view that the 'establishment' is afraid." Quite
371:. The contest is about redesigning Knowledge (XXG)'s search experience "from the ground up", to make "using Google to search Knowledge (XXG) feel outdated". The competition is independent of the Wikimedia Foundation. The winning designer and runner-up will receive tickets and travel to a talk with
879:
Disagree, Peter. Remember your
Voltaire (no need to cite the cliché). Conspiracy theories should be aired, because if they are repressed, they feed the unenlightened view that the 'establishment' is afraid. They also, on occasion, make scholars who take the mainstream view work much harder on the
782:
I don't know how much of a problem delinking of articles (their #2) is in reality. Obviously very hard to detect, if it is done intelligently. However, a simple countermeasure would be to program a tool that monitors the number of internal links to each article (and maybe its google rank too) in
605:
Don't know what really to make of Mark
Anderson's assessment of the Shakespeare authorship article's neutrality. But comparing the article to El-Gaddafi is a bit far: I don't see anything in the article about Oxfordians being gangs of drugged cockroaches, who ought to be hunted down and killed.
884:
made a magnificent case for this, and I think it extends to a case like this as well. One day I hope a scholar will take the time to write a fascinating essay on the incidental gains to
Elizabethan scholarship turned up by mainstream historians who, reading some obscure point in the heterodox
617:
Be fair. He said "... has as much claim to evenhandedness as does an entry on Libya's history written by
Muammar Gaddafi". That's about the "claim to evenhandedness", not the content itself. It's as if someone wrote "This article has as much chance of surviving as a snowball in Hell", and an
920:
Why should we worry about what a Shakespearean conspiracy theorist who writes an article in a popular magazine for electrical engineers thinks are the reasons for his inability to get his quirky ideas covered in Knowledge (XXG) they way he sees fit? This is a non-issue where a
747:
It is outrageous that Knowledge (XXG) should be vandalised to raise a web page's SEO ratings. The need of the hour is for someone to write a counter article which tells a Wikipedian how to develop a page so that it figures in the top results of a search on that topic.
1006:
were published might suggest so). Overall though, I support the decision to feature this in the Signpost's "In the news" section - it can and should feature notable accusations even when they are not well-founded. (I fondly recall crafting the ITN subtitle "
986:
It's kind of sad that the information about Mark Anderson's completely biased position was not mentioned in the Signpost article. It reads as if, as far as anyone knows, it's just some neutral third party spotting a genuine problem with an article.
864:
Which means, of course, that it is the IEEE which discredits itself by giving him a platform. Does it want to be seen as a respectable professional organisation or as a group that will give room to anyone who has a conspiracy theory to
618:
objection was raised "Comparing the article to Hell is a bit far, it doesn't have damned souls screaming in agony over eternal torment". (I'm not taking a position here on the merits itself, just pointing out the linguistics there) --
762:
It is, but it's a fundamentally ineffective tactic that will discredit itself just fine. Websites link to Knowledge (XXG) articles because they're a good source of relatively unbiased information, which the "official" website is not.
1064:
Yes, well at least WWII is over. The Shakespeare authorship wars never will be, no matter how much proof Friedman or anybody else brings to bear. It is not a rational belief, and so cannot be changed by rational arguments.
217:) left the article biased towards the Stratfordian point of view. In this vein, Anderson claims that the push to get the article featured (already protested at the time by a blog dedicated to alternative theories, see
207:
218:
547:
537:
532:
211:
552:
1049:
William Friedman went on to be chief cryptanalyst for the War Department and led the group that broke Japanese codes, making a major, if not crucial, contribution to Allied victory in World War II.--
578:
542:
685:
The article contains an error, misrepresenting Mr Anderson's remarks. We read:'Unfortunately, writes Anderson, an increase in edits by Oxfordians pushed the article towards their point of view,'
317:
brief of documenting "the most heated, most bitterly contested, and most pointless confrontations over facts in Knowledge (XXG)'s 10-year history", the English Knowledge (XXG) maintains its own
522:
406:
73:
1007:
515:
485:
476:
433:
464:
1114:
970:
I wasn't aware that Anderson has a history of trying to contribute here. Or are you saying that the article was largely written by the topic-banned person who provided the quote?--
337:: Imperica, "a site which brings together a number of creative disciplines within digital media", recently presented two features covering the work of Wikimedia UK's GLAM efforts.
509:
52:
41:
954:
And I'd like to thank you for doing so, Tom. It showed good judgement also because wikipedia gave a venue for an attack on itself. We've nothing to fear, we even welcome that.
1044:
that the works of Shakespeare contain hidden ciphers. The study disproved all claims that the works contain ciphers..." What SAQ fails to mention, but which is covered in the
183:, has claimed that Knowledge (XXG) has been a bit too quick to dismiss those who doubt that William Shakespeare wrote the works popularly attributed to him. In an article "
463:") described the author's reaction to the "very distressing" finding that only 13% of Knowledge (XXG) contributors are female (reported widely earlier this year, cf.
376:
1167:
21:
1142:
1137:
1132:
828:
I understand that Mr Anderson's next article for the IEEE will be about how Knowledge (XXG) fails to give Flat-Earthers a fair crack of the POV whip.--
847:
398:
1127:
432:
found that Knowledge (XXG) was the only website in the top fifty (in the United States), by traffic, not to install any type of tracking device (
170:
1093:
926:
200:
642:
I don't quite understand this linguistic comparison (assuming that the cockroaches bit refers to an actual quote be Gaddafi). Regards,
325:, it is a possible source for the article, which one commentator decried as not having provided "enough verification" of its examples.
262:
that occur when Wikipedians disagree about the content of an article and repeatedly overwrite each other's contributions. According to
773:
Internet. To know and not care strikes me at the moment as being slightly better than to be so harmfully dumb as not to even know. —
1122:
850:
and which is dismissed by Shakespeare scholars. In other words he's grinding the axe with which he carves the chip on his shoulder.
497:
46:
32:
17:
68:
Consensus of Knowledge (XXG) authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Knowledge (XXG); brief news
188:
783:
regular intervals. With this tool, significant changes could be detected automatically and the community could be alerted. --
410:
814:) everything was in POV equilibrium, with the nonsense of scholarship nicely balanced by the 'truth' of the fringe theory.
409:"). The benefits of the GLAM collaboration to both Knowledge (XXG) and the GLAM institution are discussed, and the article
206:
Unfortunately, writes Anderson, more Stratfordians came along and pushed the article towards their point of view, and the
318:
842:
It's worth pointing out the obvious - Anderson is not a neutral "journalist". He's the author of of the Oxfordian book
885:
literature, followed the paper-trial and produced fresh insights into Shakespeare (William of Strat)'s work and life.
810:
Mr Anderson subscribes to the 'steady state' theory of the discursive universe, in which, back in the good old days (
255:
1029:
662:
623:
1101:
1074:
1058:
1033:
1019:
996:
979:
963:
949:
934:
904:
894:
874:
859:
837:
823:
792:
777:
767:
757:
727:
705:
666:
651:
627:
612:
199:
was the author of the plays attributed to him) and Oxfordians (those who believe that the works were written by
1148:
1054:
1097:
1024:
That's pretty funny. Some of those are also more of a problem than many Wikipedians would like to admit. --
930:
688:
Mr Anderson says the article was in equilibrium until Tom Reedy, and then myself, both of us identified as
184:
1025:
658:
619:
901:
774:
452:
975:
870:
855:
833:
971:
866:
829:
945:
723:
287:
283:
1070:
1050:
1008:
Knowledge (XXG) controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
959:
890:
819:
701:
460:
249:
230:
196:
192:
187:", Anderson writes that the consensus process has for a long time worked quite well on the article
922:
992:
607:
388:
90:
574:
120:
420:
1045:
851:
753:
428:
suite that uses cookies to track users between browsing sessions. Last year, a study by the
425:
100:
941:
719:
150:
130:
1089:
1066:
1015:
955:
886:
815:
788:
697:
647:
447:
203:) creating an equilibrium that approximated the academic divide between the two camps.
169:
711:
1161:
988:
764:
321:
that have graced its articles. Since the page includes a number of those included by
295:
179:
1085:
881:
372:
346:
279:
271:
267:
110:
140:
749:
307:
154:
338:
342:
303:
275:
1011:
784:
643:
238:
165:
Consensus of Knowledge (XXG) authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship
158:
880:
archival evidence, seeing things they might not have otherwise understood.
445:: A posting by Piper Klemm, published on the blogs of US feminist magazine
413:
is mentioned as an example of the result of the collaboration's benefits.
350:
291:
259:
940:
I primarily included it because it's both funny and storm in a teacup. —
389:
How to destroy Knowledge (XXG) SERP (search engine results page) results
364:
354:
718:
Sorry about that; 'twas very late last night after a very long day. —
173:
Some leading candidates for being Shakespeare, including Shakespeare.
846:, a book that has been repeatedly rejected as a reliable source at
266:, the subjects of the 10 biggest edit-wars on Knowledge (XXG) were
299:
168:
51:
177:
Journalist Mark Anderson, writing this week for the news site
368:
496:
395:
Smithsonian Wikimedian profiled in Chronicle of Philanthropy
31:
925:
feels slighted because everyone is telling him he's wrong.
742:
True banes of the Internet, such as WebmasterFormat himself
696:) created the putative 'imbalance' he discerns in it now.
407:
First Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian Institution
590:
583:
563:
361:
Competition to design a Knowledge (XXG) search engine
254:, a global computer magazine, recently published an
588:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
417:
Knowledge (XXG) a rare exception for Google cookies
387:: A blog posting on Webmasterformat.com described "
401:at the Smithsonian's Archive of American Art (cf.
397:: The Chronicle of Philanthropy has an article on
256:article on Knowledge (XXG)'s 10 biggest edit-wars
459:, a graduate student magazine at UC Berkeley ("
353:by Derby Museums, with Terence Eden, who built
443:A girls night in: dinner, drinks, edit button?
848:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources/Noticeboard
8:
191:, with the Stratfordians (those who believe
1168:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2011-08
385:How to destroy "the bane of the Internet"
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
591:
567:
369:Knowledge (XXG) "Search design contest"
341:discussed GLAM outreach in the UK with
245:10 biggest edit-wars on Knowledge (XXG)
67:
335:Imperica covers Wikimedia UK activity
185:Knowledge (XXG)'s Shakespeare Problem
7:
399:the work being done by Sarah Stierch
306:, and co-founder of Knowledge (XXG)
453:Women, let’s claim Knowledge (XXG)!
424:(XXG) does not use the proprietary
235:Knowledge (XXG): The Missing Manual
201:Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford
805:More on Anderson and IEEE Spectrum
237:, and WMF board member Ting Chen (
53:
28:
573:These comments are automatically
282:, Street Fighter game characters
710:
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
1092:is one hell of a big red flag.
411:Jacques Seligmann & Company
189:Shakespeare authorship question
584:add the page to your watchlist
461:WikiWomen: A new kind of party
1:
319:list of the lamest edit-wars
844:Shakespeare by Another Name
1184:
1102:10:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
1075:17:04, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
1059:07:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
1034:05:19, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
1020:00:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
997:23:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
980:14:56, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
964:21:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
950:21:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
935:17:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
905:03:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
895:19:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
875:18:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
860:13:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
838:10:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
824:07:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
793:10:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
778:03:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
768:04:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
758:02:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
728:08:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
706:07:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
667:05:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
652:00:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
628:02:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
613:00:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
367:announced the launch of a
363:: Personal search engine
457:Berkeley Science Review
581:. To follow comments,
501:
229:article itself quotes
174:
36:
500:
172:
35:
577:from this article's
375:. (Reported in the
349:explored the use of
430:Wall Street Journal
313:In comparison with
197:Stratford-upon-Avon
193:William Shakespeare
568:Discuss this story
548:Arbitration report
538:WikiProject report
533:Research interview
502:
260:the confrontations
175:
42:← Back to Contents
37:
592:purging the cache
553:Technology report
347:"Quiet realities"
208:mediation process
47:View Latest Issue
1175:
1151:
1046:William Friedman
1026:Seth Finkelstein
714:
659:Seth Finkelstein
620:Seth Finkelstein
595:
593:
587:
566:
543:Featured content
520:
512:
505:
488:
480:
426:Google Analytics
233:, the author of
161:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1147:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1118:
1106:
1105:
1088:while omitting
1083:
923:fringe theorist
807:
744:
602:
597:
589:
582:
571:
570:
564:+ Add a comment
562:
558:
557:
556:
513:
508:
506:
503:
492:
491:
489:"In the news" →
486:
483:
478:
378:Washington Post
331:
247:
167:
162:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1181:
1179:
1171:
1170:
1160:
1159:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1090:Global warming
1082:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1000:
999:
983:
982:
968:
967:
966:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
806:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
743:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
633:
632:
631:
630:
601:
598:
572:
569:
561:
560:
559:
555:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
525:
523:News and notes
519:
507:
495:
494:
493:
484:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
440:
414:
392:
382:
358:
330:
327:
258:, documenting
246:
243:
231:John Broughton
166:
163:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1180:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1163:
1150:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1116:
1112:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:76.254.20.205
1091:
1087:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1047:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
998:
994:
990:
985:
984:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
952:
951:
947:
943:
939:
938:
937:
936:
932:
928:
927:128.59.169.46
924:
906:
903:
898:
897:
896:
892:
888:
883:
878:
877:
876:
872:
868:
863:
862:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
840:
839:
835:
831:
827:
826:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
808:
804:
794:
790:
786:
781:
780:
779:
776:
771:
770:
769:
766:
761:
760:
759:
755:
751:
746:
745:
741:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
690:Stratfordians
687:
686:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
668:
664:
660:
655:
654:
653:
649:
645:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
629:
625:
621:
616:
615:
614:
611:
610:
604:
603:
599:
594:
585:
580:
576:
565:
554:
551:
549:
546:
544:
541:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
517:
511:
510:1 August 2011
504:In this issue
499:
490:
482:
481:"In the news"
469:
467:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:
444:
441:
438:
436:
431:
427:
422:
418:
415:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
390:
386:
383:
380:
379:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:"In the know"
336:
333:
332:
328:
326:
324:
320:
316:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
244:
242:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:IEEE Spectrum
224:
222:
216:
214:
209:
204:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:
180:IEEE Spectrum
171:
164:
160:
156:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
54:1 August 2011
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
1110:
1086:Caesar salad
1042:
1010:") Regards,
919:
882:Raul Hilberg
843:
812:illo tempore
811:
715:
693:
689:
608:
527:
516:all comments
465:
456:
446:
442:
434:
429:
416:
402:
394:
384:
377:
373:Edward Tufte
360:
334:
322:
314:
312:
280:Nintendo Wii
272:Caesar salad
268:Nikola Tesla
263:
250:
248:
234:
226:
220:
212:
205:
178:
176:
159:Tilman Bayer
1149:Suggestions
972:Peter cohen
867:Peter cohen
830:Peter cohen
600:Shakespeare
575:transcluded
528:In the news
455:") and the
405:coverage: "
308:Jimmy Wales
65:In the news
1113:. You can
1109:It's your
1084:Including
942:Tom Morris
720:Tom Morris
694:Oxfordians
315:PC World's
304:Polar bear
296:The Eagles
276:Death Star
151:Tom Morris
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2011-08-01
1143:Subscribe
1081:Edit wars
1067:Tom Reedy
956:Nishidani
887:Nishidani
816:Nishidani
698:Nishidani
579:talk page
421:new study
239:User:Wing
219:previous
1162:Category
1138:Newsroom
1133:Archives
1111:Signpost
989:DreamGuy
900:true. —
765:Dcoetzee
609:innotata
479:Previous
468:coverage
466:Signpost
437:coverage
435:Signpost
403:Signpost
351:QR codes
329:In brief
323:PC World
292:Yao Ming
264:PC World
251:PC World
223:coverage
221:Signpost
215:coverage
213:Signpost
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
1115:help us
865:push?--
365:Greplin
355:QRpedia
343:User:Fæ
111:Twitter
852:Paul B
750:AshLin
692:,(not
302:, the
155:Lumos3
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
1128:About
716:Fixed
300:Pluto
16:<
1123:Home
1098:talk
1071:talk
1055:talk
1030:talk
1016:talk
1012:HaeB
993:talk
976:talk
960:talk
946:talk
931:talk
902:¾-10
891:talk
871:talk
856:talk
834:talk
820:talk
789:talk
785:Tinz
775:¾-10
754:talk
724:talk
702:talk
663:talk
648:talk
644:HaeB
624:talk
487:Next
419:: A
286:and
157:and
141:Digg
1051:agr
448:Ms.
310:.
288:Ken
284:Ryu
241:).
195:of
149:By
76:—
1164::
1100:)
1073:)
1057:)
1032:)
1018:)
995:)
978:)
962:)
948:)
933:)
893:)
873:)
858:)
836:)
822:)
791:)
756:)
726:)
704:)
665:)
650:)
626:)
477:←
451:("
439:).
381:.)
345:;
298:,
294:,
290:,
278:,
274:,
270:,
153:,
1117:.
1096:(
1069:(
1053:(
1028:(
1014:(
991:(
974:(
958:(
944:(
929:(
889:(
869:(
854:(
832:(
818:(
787:(
752:(
722:(
700:(
661:(
646:(
622:(
606:—
596:.
586:.
518:)
514:(
357:.
210:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
