693:
161:
306:
117:
107:
434:, which not only shaped the genre professionally but gave birth to all the myriad spinoff fandoms, could be improved: there is a tendency among those unfamiliar with the field to challenge the reality that (as with other minority cultures) SF fandom's history is embodied in our own publications, which means mimeographed fanzines and the like. We do have several Hugo-winning SF editors who are also Knowledge (XXG) editors.
292:
281:
33:
127:
335:"so there would be something broader to tie together editors and articles interested in science fiction, rather than specific franchises or media, and especially sf literature." WikiProject Science Fiction is home to 59 Featured Articles, 3 A-Class Articles, and 219 Good Articles. The project is the parent of a variety of franchise-specific WikiProjects ranging from
87:
597:
137:
97:
517:
Absolutely, just like any other project dealing with popular culture. I think we've done a good job with it in general, though. As with everything else, I think we try to get consensus any time there is a dispute over something, though sometimes the information is removed as just too trivial (meaning
443:
There's certainly better coverage on more recent best-selling authors, but I think the coverage on older authors and editors who had an impact is improving, too. It's sometimes very difficult to find information on older topics, especially online topics, so without access to older magazines and other
429:
Knowledge (XXG)'s recentist bias is actually somewhat reversed in the area of written SF, with careful detail being maintained on the classics of the field. However, the reverse is true with regard to film and television, with the most recent crap being obsessed upon, regardless of importance to the
568:
As there is a lot of cross-over between the topics, I think it's good to have one place someone can go for information on all of it, so they can then pursue whichever avenue they wish. Also, the portal has "tabs" for each of the three major topics for those who wish to find information on only that
641:
to keep up the "In the news", "Upcoming releases", and "Bestsellers" sections. Those are the only sections which require regular maintenance, but it is sometimes hard to keep up with all of that and do all the other things I like to help with, so things occasionally get behind. Volunteers are
374:
I'm a fairly hardcore SF fan and semi-pro writer, with multiple published reviews and articles to my credit; I've attended over a hundred conventions, been Fan Guest of Honor at two, got married to a fellow fan at one (31 years and still together); still read and collect the
449:
Have you worked with any of WikiProject
Science Fiction's franchise-specific child projects? How successful have these child projects been in comparison to WikiProject Science Fiction? How do talk page discussions at WikiProject Science Fiction differ from the child
229:
518:
the link to the article topic is extremely tenuous, at best). As Orange Mike mentioned, a large number of franchise-specific wikis have been established where more fannish information can be included if it can't be included here for whatever reason.
484:
for large franchises like Star Trek and Star Wars? Who determines when there is too much trivial information included in a science fiction article? What other avenues are open for editors who want to share their overly-detailed knowledge of a
547:
It can require a lot of work to rewrite, but I rarely find an article so far gone that nothing in it can be used. And I agree that it's more often a problem in TV and film articles than in articles about print science fiction
470:
I haven't done much with specific franchise work, though I wander in and out of them on a regular basis. It really depends on my mood and interests at the time as I have very broad interests. This can be seen in the
253:
773:
235:
625:
Just don't call it "sci-fi", okay? Aside from the non-encyclopedic tone, the term itself is regarded as childish and pejorative by a significant element of those who have shaped the field over the past 75
384:
I've been a fan for many years, and I also help in various fandom-related endeavors (running conventions, etc.), so I enjoy helping improve and add information to
Knowledge (XXG) to help in the coverage.
742:
680:
671:
747:
727:
393:
I joined the SF project literally days ago. Rather than having any real knowledge of SF, my interest is in the horror video games and films which happen to be in a science fiction setting: films like
737:
722:
609:
Without having any in-depth knowledge of the project, the most visible issues to me are the backlogs in articles needing rating by the project and the list of assessments which are long overdue.
202:
717:
663:
73:
208:
418:
Are some science fiction authors, eras, or sub-genres better covered than others on
Knowledge (XXG)? What can be done to improve the breadth of Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of science fiction?
710:
214:
704:
557:
with three other projects. What benefits have come from sharing this responsibility? Are there any other ways WikiProject
Science Fiction has collaborated with other WikiProjects?
52:
41:
223:
538:
This is more of a problem in the media (TV and film) than the actual print SF. It can be dealt with, but we have to keep re-educating new editors as to what's appropriate.
248:
886:
461:
They tend to draw the
Aspergerish stereotype obsessive specialists, although it's unfair to underestimate the research into detail which such people can achieve.
21:
444:
older sources it can be very hard to find enough to make sure an article is able to meet the inclusion standard (as they tend to be very recentism-oriented).
861:
856:
851:
187:
323:
846:
193:
344:
798:, as in horse tack--has to do with control) not "reigning in". Since the question is already answered, this might be a place to use "".
336:
841:
692:
46:
32:
17:
340:
822:
807:
363:
What motivated you to join WikiProject
Science Fiction? What is your favorite science fiction novel/comic/film/series?
178:
554:
257:
867:
524:
475:
which I designed, built, and maintain. I try to have it include as broad a range of information as possible.
406:
431:
410:
182:
527:
perspective? Are these in-universe articles salvageable or is it typically easier to start from scratch?
398:
653:
Even if your interests are narrow within this field you can still help out with what does interest you.
637:
There's a lot to do here, and more hands certainly make the work lighter. I'd love to have help at the
481:
648:
604:
394:
388:
356:
272:
803:
818:
67:
586:
413:. I almost exclusively edit video game topics and hope to contribute to the SF project that way.
90:
769:
120:
243:
497:
100:
620:
533:
491:
456:
424:
369:
348:
130:
508:. A great number of these franchises have their own wikis, in some cases multiple wikis.
799:
299:
264:
Submit your project's news and announcements for next week's WikiProject Report at the
880:
814:
632:
580:
563:
542:
512:
465:
438:
402:
379:
352:
332:
150:
305:
110:
291:
280:
140:
295:
285:
298:
is considered one of the
Fathers of Science Fiction, alongside Jules Verne and
659:
593:
on the speculative fiction portal. Those should keep anyone busy for years.
314:
574:
What are the project's most urgent needs? How can a new member help today?
504:, will be most closely watched by those with the deepest interest in
662:
project with a warm heart. Until then, brush up on biology in the
310:
795:
638:
472:
51:
691:
480:
Has WikiProject
Science Fiction had to deal with reining in
159:
31:
68:
Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject
Science Fiction
785:
778:
758:
327:. The project was started in December 2006 by former
523:
How often do you encounter articles written from an
783:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
642:welcome, and I'm happy to train you on what to do.
430:genre. Our coverage of the underlying culture of
401:and the Aliens/Predator series; and games like
321:This week, we explored the great unknown with
313:has served as inspiration for settings in the
8:
590:
197:in collaboration with several other projects
887:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2012-02
304:
290:
279:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
786:
762:
284:A lavishly decorated volume written by
7:
594:
500:problem, since an article on, say,
347:. We interviewed long-time members
200:New issues of the newsletters for
53:
28:
768:These comments are automatically
614:Anything else you'd like to add?
595:
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
836:: doing it for free since 2005.
779:add the page to your watchlist
1:
808:02:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
658:Next week, we'll check out a
813:Thanks. It has been fixed. -
794:That would be "reining in" (
203:WikiProject Military History
324:WikiProject Science Fiction
224:February Wikification Drive
188:WikiProject Women's History
903:
555:Speculative fiction Portal
496:Certainly. There can be a
473:Speculative fiction portal
823:19:55, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
591:list of things you can do
227:ends Wednesday while the
179:International Women's Day
252:from now until May with
230:March Copy Editing Drive
215:WikiProject Conservatism
209:WikiProject Christianity
553:The project shares the
776:. To follow comments,
696:
684:"WikiProject report" →
432:science fiction fandom
355:along with new member
318:
302:
288:
246:in the Netherlands is
164:
36:
695:
308:
294:
283:
236:Move to Commons Drive
183:Women's History Month
163:
35:
772:from this article's
676:"WikiProject report"
587:list of things to do
258:Teylers GLAM project
249:sponsoring a contest
763:Discuss this story
743:Arbitration report
733:WikiProject report
697:
585:The project has a
319:
303:
289:
218:have been released
165:
65:WikiProject report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
787:purging the cache
748:Technology report
728:Discussion report
254:real-world prizes
47:View Latest Issue
894:
870:
790:
788:
782:
761:
738:Featured content
715:
707:
705:27 February 2012
700:
683:
675:
600:
599:
598:
331:editor-in-chief
273:WikiProject Desk
270:
194:month-long drive
169:
168:WikiProject news
166:
162:
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
54:27 February 2012
902:
901:
897:
896:
895:
893:
892:
891:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
866:
864:
859:
854:
849:
844:
837:
829:
828:
792:
784:
777:
766:
765:
759:+ Add a comment
757:
753:
752:
751:
723:Recent research
708:
703:
701:
698:
687:
686:
681:
678:
673:
649:Someone another
605:Someone another
596:
389:Someone another
357:Someone another
278:
277:
276:
268:
262:
256:as part of the
244:Teyler's Museum
173:
172:
167:
160:
158:
154:
148:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
900:
898:
890:
889:
879:
878:
865:
860:
855:
850:
845:
840:
839:
838:
831:
830:
827:
826:
825:
767:
764:
756:
755:
754:
750:
745:
740:
735:
730:
725:
720:
718:News and notes
714:
702:
690:
689:
688:
679:
670:
669:
668:
657:
655:
654:
644:
643:
628:
627:
611:
610:
601:
571:
570:
550:
549:
539:
520:
519:
509:
477:
476:
462:
446:
445:
435:
415:
414:
385:
376:
300:Hugo Gernsback
263:
261:
260:
240:
239:begin Thursday
219:
198:
174:
170:
157:
156:
155:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
899:
888:
885:
884:
882:
869:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
835:
824:
820:
816:
812:
811:
810:
809:
805:
801:
797:
789:
780:
775:
771:
760:
749:
746:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
731:
729:
726:
724:
721:
719:
716:
712:
706:
699:In this issue
694:
685:
677:
667:
665:
661:
652:
650:
646:
645:
640:
636:
634:
630:
629:
624:
622:
618:
617:
616:
615:
608:
606:
602:
592:
588:
584:
582:
578:
577:
576:
575:
567:
565:
561:
560:
559:
558:
556:
546:
544:
540:
537:
535:
531:
530:
529:
528:
526:
516:
514:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
493:
489:
488:
487:
486:
483:
474:
469:
467:
463:
460:
458:
454:
453:
452:
451:
442:
440:
436:
433:
428:
426:
422:
421:
420:
419:
412:
408:
404:
403:Dino Crisis 3
400:
396:
395:Event Horizon
392:
390:
386:
383:
381:
377:
373:
371:
367:
366:
365:
364:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
316:
312:
307:
301:
297:
293:
287:
282:
274:
267:
259:
255:
251:
250:
245:
241:
238:
237:
232:
231:
226:
225:
220:
217:
216:
211:
210:
205:
204:
199:
196:
195:
191:is hosting a
190:
189:
184:
180:
177:To celebrate
176:
175:
171:News in brief
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
833:
793:
732:
711:all comments
660:cold-blooded
656:
647:
631:
619:
613:
612:
603:
579:
573:
572:
562:
552:
551:
541:
532:
522:
521:
511:
505:
501:
490:
479:
478:
464:
455:
448:
447:
437:
423:
417:
416:
387:
378:
368:
362:
361:
345:Transformers
328:
322:
320:
265:
247:
234:
228:
222:
213:
207:
201:
192:
186:
868:Suggestions
770:transcluded
525:in-universe
309:Modern day
296:H. G. Wells
286:Jules Verne
621:Orangemike
589:, and the
534:Orangemike
492:Orangemike
485:franchise?
457:Orangemike
425:Orangemike
407:Dead Space
370:Orangemike
349:Orangemike
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2012-02-27
862:Subscribe
800:Valfontis
774:talk page
450:projects?
411:Space Gun
399:The Thing
337:Star Wars
317:sub-genre
315:cyberpunk
881:Category
857:Newsroom
852:Archives
834:Signpost
815:Mabeenot
674:Previous
633:Nihonjoe
581:Nihonjoe
564:Nihonjoe
543:Nihonjoe
513:Nihonjoe
506:Farscape
502:Farscape
482:fancruft
466:Nihonjoe
439:Nihonjoe
380:Nihonjoe
353:Nihonjoe
333:Ragesoss
329:Signpost
266:Signpost
233:and the
151:Mabeenot
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
664:archive
548:topics.
111:Twitter
639:portal
626:years.
569:topic.
498:WP:OWN
409:, and
375:stuff.
341:Heroes
212:, and
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
847:About
311:Tokyo
16:<
842:Home
832:The
819:talk
804:talk
796:rein
682:Next
351:and
242:The
221:The
181:and
141:Digg
343:to
339:to
149:By
76:—
883::
821:)
806:)
672:←
666:.
405:,
397:,
359:.
271:s
206:,
185:,
817:(
802:(
791:.
781:.
713:)
709:(
651::
635::
623::
607::
583::
566::
545::
536::
515::
494::
468::
459::
441::
427::
391::
382::
372::
275:.
269:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
