295:
contributed to a positive outcome, but the lack of guidance and support from forum volunteers, and uncooperative fellow editors, made the experiences unpleasant. 70% had volunteered with dispute resolution at some point; however, only 40% did so in the month before the survey. This reluctance appears to be due to the complexity of dispute resolution or a lack of understanding on how to resolve disputes effectively. Particular issues are the complexity of requesting dispute resolution, with a lack of uniform handling, along with the time-consuming nature of the processes. The lack of forum volunteers to run the forum is also a problem.
336:
408:
510:
328:
from experienced volunteers. From the perspective of a volunteer, discussions are too long to read, consume too much of their time, and result in little recognition for the amount of work involved. There is also a lack of support and guidance for new volunteers – they essentially need to jump into it from the deep end. The results of the survey suggest that the community's views mostly resonate with my prior understanding.
121:
111:
283:
541:
37:
131:
91:
200:
141:
101:
327:
It's been somewhat clear to me for some time what the problems with dispute resolution are. From the perspective of a participant, they need to wade through a bunch of dispute resolution forums to find the correct one, and then find the process unstructured, inefficient, confusing and lacking support
244:
Most of my four years on
Knowledge (XXG) has involved the development and management of dispute resolution processes. While I've made some progress, it became increasingly clear to me that to make the improvements to these processes that such a large, complex, and often fractious project has needed,
207:
Since May 2012 I've been a
Wikimedia Foundation community fellow with the task of researching and improving dispute resolution on English Knowledge (XXG). Surveying members of the community has revealed much about their thoughts on and experiences with dispute resolution. I've analysed processes to
357:
But we can't make these changes alone. We need your input. We want you to share with us your experiences with dispute resolution, and how you think it can be improved. We'd also love to hear advice you have for volunteers, whether they're working within a DR process or if they're just editors on a
348:
Changes need to be made to make dispute resolution more effective and efficient. The alphabet soup of noticeboards needs some sort of universal request form like the one demonstrated above to help foster structured, productive discussions, while making them clearer and easier to use for volunteers
331:
There are other things to consider. Due to a lack of structure in some dispute resolution forums, discussions can easily get out of hand, and become extremely long and unproductive. Discussion often is retrospective as opposed to prospective, and thus does not focus on resolving the dispute. Every
493:
Hi, peanut gallery here: Unless there is a normalised version of that graph, it will be not very useful, as the absolute values cannot be compared between categories. Also, its not fair to make comparisons akin to: "1 in 3 people thought apple was aweome, but 2 in 3 people thought orange was OK."
318:
showed some encouraging stats – a reduction of 67% to first response times, 60% reduction in discussion times, 25% reduction in thread size, an average of 2.85 volunteers to a thread (up from 1.5), and a success rate of over 64% – however the number of volunteers decreased by 20%. This shows that
294:
In summary, while some aspects of dispute resolution are viewed positively, there are many areas for improvement. The participants graded both their personal experiences and their perception of the effectiveness of the processes poorly. Experienced forum volunteers and co-operative fellow editors
310:
to keep track of disputes and a form (see right) to make filing disputes easier. We also set some goals: decrease the first response time by 40% to 10 hours or less, increase the success rate by 22 points, to 70%, increase the number of active volunteers by at least 17% (to 30), and decrease the
265:
The main problems given for dispute resolution are its complexity, its inaccessibility, and the number of understaffed resolution processes available. Respondents want stricter action taken against problematic editors, and a simplified, more accessible process where closure can be brought to a
353:
earlier this year, and we continue to discuss changes to other forums – but we also need to make participation less ambiguous and time-consuming, and make it easier to actually get involved in resolving disputes. Volunteers are the lifeblood of the system, without whom it would not function.
277:
Dispute resolution volunteers do so because they feel the process is critical to
Knowledge (XXG)'s functioning, like helping people, or are motivated by the fact they've already received assistance as parties in the forum. Some respondents haven’t volunteered to help run the forum due to the
319:
while the forum volunteers handled disputes in a quicker timeframe compared to May, it was from a small group of volunteers – so essentially they had just worked harder this month. This emphasises the need for more volunteers – if the existing volunteers burnout, the processes will suffer.
30:
Dispute resolution – where we're at, what we're doing well, and what needs fixing: Since May 2012 I've been a
Wikimedia Foundation community fellow with the task of researching and improving dispute resolution on English Knowledge (XXG); I've analysed processes to determine their use and
254:
216:
Dispute resolution has existed on
Knowledge (XXG) from day one. Until late 2003, Jimmy Wales acted as the arbiter for all major disputes. Following the founding of the Mediation and Arbitration Committees, Wales delegated the mandate to resolve these disputes to those bodies.
236:
targeted at issues surrounding biographies of living persons, the use of reliable sources, the neutrality of content, and the presence of original research or fringe theories in articles. Most recently, a noticeboard was created to address a variety of disputes, the
590:
I can't agree anymore that the biggest problem with resolving disputes is that I have no idea where to go. If I had a dispute I would've clicked around on blue links for "are you in the right place", if not here's five other places you might want to check out. Ugh.
273:
Opinions of dispute resolution are overall negative – while respondents rate arbitration as the best dispute resolution forum (one in three respondents rate it as good or very good), Wikiquette assistance is regarded as the worst (only 1 in 12 rate it as
302:). Among aspects I examined were forum volunteer counts, response times by volunteers, the time a thread was open, and success rates. Response times ranged from 5 to 24 hours, thread times from 2 to 28 days, and resolution rates from 0 to 100%.
269:
94% of respondents have requested assistance from a dispute resolution forum at some point, and are generally unhappy with their experiences (only one in five were satisfied); 62% have participated in dispute resolution in the last
638:
Those who "win" a dispute tend to rate the resolution process more favorably than those who lose. It is extremely difficult for most people to separate their opinion of the quality of a process from their opinion of the
299:
305:
Since the dispute resolution noticeboard was the most used forum in May, I focused my efforts there during August. We made some changes to the setup of the noticeboard – creating a robot to help manage cases, a
290:. Here, participants fill out a request through a form, instead of through wikitext, making it easier for them to use, but also imposing word restrictions so volunteers can review the dispute in a timely manner.
369:
to work towards further streamlining dispute resolution. I envision a dispute resolution system that is efficient and effective, and which has an abundance of volunteers. I hope you will join me in my efforts.
437:
394:
203:
The effectiveness of dispute resolution, according to the survey. Purple and light-blue on the right-side edge of each bar indicate favourable community attitudes to each form of dispute resolution.
442:
432:
77:
425:
473:
191:
419:
56:
45:
379:
315:
287:
332:
day, our volunteers are learning how to tackle these problems, but participants need to focus on the issues at hand and work together to find a way to resolve them.
713:
21:
688:
683:
678:
278:
unpleasantness of disputes, the prolonged nature of dispute resolution, poor past experiences or a lack of knowledge of how disputes can be resolved.
673:
495:
668:
407:
50:
36:
17:
208:
determine their use and effectiveness, and have presented ideas that I hope will improve the future of dispute resolution.
261:
I conducted in April, there were four key findings I learned from editors who had participated in dispute resolution:
555:
694:
659:
629:
499:
307:
531:
On my monitor the words on the image(when zoomed in) are not readable without a magnifying glass. Regards,
358:
talk page trying to cool down a discussion. Also, if you're interested in volunteering, please drop by the
643:
633:
619:
613:
600:
582:
576:
561:
535:
525:
521:
503:
298:
To follow this up, I undertook an analysis of a few dispute resolution forums in May (full results are at
220:
A number of informal, community-created processes were developed over time to resolve disputes, including
606:
Well, yes, but we need to think from the perspective of someone that's not too familiar with the system.
384:
366:
359:
258:
233:
552:
163:
625:
350:
229:
179:
are those of the author only. Readers are invited to respond or offer critical commentary in the
624:
I just had a great outcome that solved all my problems, so it works at least some of the time.
94:
608:
571:
517:
469:
335:
154:
124:
640:
596:
532:
389:
238:
225:
104:
71:
31:
effectiveness, and present ideas that I hope will improve the future of dispute resolution.
221:
167:
134:
509:
707:
114:
282:
144:
72:
Dispute resolution – where we're at, what we're doing well, and what needs fixing
592:
540:
199:
365:
Over the next month, I'll also be soliciting input from the community
539:
349:
and participants. We're on the right path with the closure of the
334:
281:
198:
176:
55:
339:
A listing of just some of the noticeboards on
Knowledge (XXG).
569:
I've uploaded a higher resolution graph - I hope this helps.
406:
362:
or leave us comments here and we will help you get started.
183:, while those wishing to author their own op-ed may use the
35:
485:
478:
458:
311:
resolution timeframe by at least 19% (to seven days).
380:
Knowledge (XXG):Dispute
Resolution Improvement Project
483:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
253:I presented some of the findings of my research in
344:Where we need to go, and how we can get there
8:
288:dispute resolution noticeboard request form
166:with the Wikimedia Foundation researching
714:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2012-09
657:Make sure we cover what matters to you –
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
486:
462:
29:
7:
57:
28:
468:These comments are automatically
212:How far have we come in 11 years?
508:
255:a presentation at Wikimania 2012
245:more information was required.
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
634:00:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
479:add the page to your watchlist
390:Dispute Resolution Wikiproject
360:dispute resolution noticeboard
239:dispute resolution noticeboard
1:
620:00:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
601:02:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
583:05:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
562:20:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
536:12:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
526:18:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
504:17:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
395:Dispute resolution newsletter
180:
644:21:10, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
175:The views expressed in this
730:
385:Dispute Resolution Survey
257:, in Washington DC. From
234:variety of noticeboards
544:
476:. To follow comments,
411:
340:
291:
204:
40:
543:
410:
338:
285:
202:
39:
472:from this article's
323:How did we get here?
226:requests for comment
660:leave a suggestion
545:
463:Discuss this story
412:
341:
316:results for August
292:
230:informal mediation
205:
168:dispute resolution
162:Steven Zhang is a
46:← Back to Contents
41:
565:
487:purging the cache
438:Technology report
286:Stage one of the
51:View Latest Issue
721:
697:
662:
618:
616:
611:
581:
579:
574:
560:
512:
490:
488:
482:
461:
443:Featured content
430:
422:
420:3 September 2012
415:
249:Where we are now
189:
181:comments section
164:community fellow
157:
143:
142:
133:
132:
123:
122:
113:
112:
103:
102:
93:
92:
63:
61:
59:
58:3 September 2012
729:
728:
724:
723:
722:
720:
719:
718:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
693:
691:
686:
681:
676:
671:
664:
658:
654:
653:
614:
609:
607:
577:
572:
570:
492:
484:
477:
466:
465:
459:+ Add a comment
457:
453:
452:
451:
423:
418:
416:
413:
351:mediation cabal
266:dispute quickly
187:
158:
152:
151:
150:
149:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
90:
84:
81:
70:
66:
64:
54:
53:
48:
42:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
727:
725:
717:
716:
706:
705:
692:
687:
682:
677:
672:
667:
666:
665:
656:
655:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
626:MathewTownsend
588:
587:
586:
585:
567:
566:
529:
528:
467:
464:
456:
455:
454:
450:
445:
440:
435:
433:News and notes
429:
417:
405:
404:
403:
402:
400:
398:
397:
392:
387:
382:
376:
375:
367:through an RFC
346:
345:
325:
324:
280:
279:
275:
274:satisfactory).
271:
267:
251:
250:
214:
213:
197:
196:
172:
148:
147:
137:
127:
117:
107:
97:
86:
85:
82:
76:
75:
74:
73:
68:
67:
65:
62:
49:
44:
43:
34:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
726:
715:
712:
711:
709:
696:
690:
685:
680:
675:
670:
661:
645:
642:
637:
636:
635:
631:
627:
623:
622:
621:
617:
612:
605:
604:
603:
602:
598:
594:
584:
580:
575:
568:
563:
558:
557:
554:
549:
548:
547:
546:
542:
538:
537:
534:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
489:
480:
475:
471:
460:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
427:
421:
414:In this issue
409:
401:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
381:
378:
377:
373:
372:
371:
368:
363:
361:
355:
352:
343:
342:
337:
333:
329:
322:
321:
320:
317:
312:
309:
303:
301:
296:
289:
284:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
260:
256:
248:
247:
246:
242:
240:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:third opinion
218:
211:
210:
209:
201:
195:
193:
184:
182:
178:
173:
171:
169:
165:
160:
159:
156:
146:
138:
136:
128:
126:
118:
116:
108:
106:
98:
96:
88:
87:
79:
60:
52:
47:
38:
23:
19:
589:
551:
550:Here ya go.
530:
518:Szhang (WMF)
513:
496:46.115.17.33
447:
426:all comments
399:
364:
356:
347:
330:
326:
313:
304:
297:
293:
252:
243:
219:
215:
206:
192:opinion desk
186:
174:
161:
155:Steven Zhang
695:Suggestions
533:Sun Creator
470:transcluded
556:Farmbrough
516:- thanks.
259:the survey
83:Share this
78:Contribute
22:2012-09-03
689:Subscribe
474:talk page
300:this page
708:Category
684:Newsroom
679:Archives
639:result.—
374:See also
308:template
185:Signpost
125:LinkedIn
105:Facebook
20: |
115:Twitter
641:Finell
610:Steven
593:Dan653
573:Steven
232:and a
135:Reddit
95:E-mail
674:About
615:Zhang
578:Zhang
514:Fixed
448:Op-ed
270:year.
177:op-ed
69:Op-ed
16:<
669:Home
630:talk
597:talk
553:Rich
522:talk
500:talk
314:The
145:Digg
153:By
80:—
710::
632:)
599:)
559:,
524:)
502:)
241:.
228:,
224:,
190:s
663:.
628:(
595:(
564:.
520:(
498:(
491:.
481:.
428:)
424:(
194:.
188:'
170:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
