620:
165:
121:
111:
372:+1 to Johnbod on his first answerâand he should know, he's done a lot of the work there. As for improving coverage, it depends on the subject area. Bios of contemporary figures are easy to write; historical ones not as much. A lot of research material that would make for good articles about say, articles of clothing is not readily available online, and not everyone can get to the libraries that would have it offline.
37:
131:
91:
141:
101:
580:
contained a photo of a lipstick palette rather than rouge from 2006 to 2011 (!). If more women were involved in
Knowledge (XXG), we wouldn't see issues like this, and I believe our fashion articles would be much better-developed. (A special thanks, of course, to all the men who do help out in this
415:
Perhaps the generally low quality of the articles works in our favor hereâthose would use
Knowledge (XXG) to promote their fashion lines know it's a not good source, not widely read for that kind of information, so I don't see much effort to influence it in a promotional way. What there is does get
533:
magazines is more lifestyle-related; they also tend to profile various individuals outside the world of fashion. Style.com does put out reviews of most major fashion shows, but it's hard to get a broad view given collection-by-collection articles. There are relatively few sources that write "what
336:
needed some improvement. That turned out to be a two-week task, during which I learned of the fashion project's recent creation. I was probably the first male editor to join that project (I do find fashion interesting, although you'd never know it from the way I dress). So I did a lot of work
389:
are actually very hard to get right. Everyone knows what trousers are, right? And everyone adds what they know. It's hard to find a good balance among historic coverage, contemporary trends, styles, and component parts. Similarly, we have focus articles on the
30:
WikiProject
Fashion: This week, we walked the runway with WikiProject Fashion. Started in March 2007, the project is home to 4 Featured Articles and 41 Good Articles. The project has a lengthy list of how you can help and a list of Article
575:
Knowledge (XXG)'s fashion coverage is often somewhat of an embarrassment in my opinion, and I think the problem is closely related to
Knowledge (XXG)'s demographic slant and lack of female contributors. For example, the article
346:
i focus on historical fashion, which has always been an interest of mine, and I was motivated to join the project when I saw some of the skimpy coverage we had five or six years ago. I think "hey, I can fix this!" Is a great
425:
I've seen a lot of articles about marginally notable designers and models created as a part of apparent PR efforts. I really haven't seen much promotional activity with more established brands, however.
679:
607:
598:
245:
238:
231:
224:
217:
210:
203:
196:
189:
182:
664:
669:
654:
659:
644:
590:
77:
516:. This may be one reason why not many good editors work in this area (not that I can claim much knowlege of our coverage). For historical & traditional fashion the situation is not bad.
454:, too. As for the pop-culture connections, it's largely because of the work on those projects that we have some quality articles for ours about people for whom fashion is a side thing like
649:
637:
474:
Has it been easy to find reliable sources for articles about fashion? What kinds of fashion books, magazines, television programs, and websites are useful for
Knowledge (XXG) articles?
550:
framework of this project would be welcome. Ideally I'd love for the fashion project to have the sort of fashionista/o you rarely find: both with an intricate knowledge of the topic
428:
How closely does
Knowledge (XXG)'s fashion coverage overlap with coverage of pop culture? Are there any art or entertainment projects that could collaborate with WikiProject Fashion?
631:
56:
45:
328:, in about two days, I created the article in about the same amount of time (this was six or so years ago). From there I went to starting the article on the (then-upcoming)
397:
Does the project deal with many marketers trying to influence articles about their brands? What can be done to protect the neutrality of
Knowledge (XXG)'s fashion articles?
790:
529:
magazines (which recycle a good deal of content among themselves), for example, generally have relatively few profiles of designers and such. Much content in the
273:
437:
Eerrr... dunno. There's a fair bit of an overlap with my main project, Visual arts, on the historical side, as with User:PKM and others. Also
Textiles, certainly.
350:
Are some time periods or elements of fashion better represented on
Knowledge (XXG) than others? What can be done to improve coverage of neglected fashion topics?
468:
21:
765:
760:
755:
525:
I think that finding reliable sources for contemporary fashion is relatively difficult, even setting aside the issue of advertorial content. The various
305:
I really only cover historical fashions, and my interest came as a by-product of my interest in art history, and the very fine historical series by
750:
471:
seems mainly focused on individual gemstones & the like. Our coverage of historical, let alone archaeological, jewellery is very thin indeed.
738:
447:
483:
As I said above, it depends. For contemporary subjects, there's plenty of reliable sourcesâall the fashion magazines like the various
385:
is a great example of many informed editors working through the evidence together - check out the Talk page. But basic articles like
745:
619:
406:
I think so, in articles on brands and designers. It's a lot of work for the normal AFC/AFD processes, which I think do a decent job.
359:
Generally I think we cover historical fashion, and worldwide traditional costume, better than contemporary fashion, plus there's no
50:
36:
17:
586:
269:
264:
268:. Started in March 2007, the project is home to 4 Featured Articles and 41 Good Articles. The project has a lengthy list of
324:
329:
391:
296:
What motivated you to join WikiProject
Fashion? Do you tend to focus more on current trends or historical fashions?
771:
253:
Do you want to see your favorite project in a future edition of the WikiProject Report? Post a request at the
491:
563:
Agree with that. I'm not sure the to-do list on the project page represents our top priorities frankly.
381:
i think our coverage of niche items is good in many cases, but we're less successful with the basics.
382:
451:
254:
337:
assessing articles and creating categories and navboxes, and have remained involved since then.
94:
577:
570:
520:
420:
319:
289:
124:
546:
A larger community of involved editors. Anything a new contributor can find to do within the
541:
485:
478:
441:
410:
367:
313:
281:
363:
issues to worry about, thank heavens. We need more good editors interested in the subject.
360:
104:
509:
134:
784:
154:
558:
503:
462:
455:
432:
401:
354:
333:
300:
277:
114:
499:. Older subjects, or less people-oriented ones, not as much online, or in English.
512:
for contemporary fashion are rather problemmatic, since we know there's a lot of
144:
513:
537:
What are the project's most urgent needs? How can a new contributor help today?
534:
everyone knows" about contemporary designers and their aesthetics more broadly.
496:
386:
376:
341:
306:
285:
394:
through the Medieval period, but no general survey of Medieval clothing.
55:
618:
585:
Next week, we'll bark at the postman. Until then, celebrate
163:
35:
721:
709:
702:
690:
450:
might find a fair amount of common ground. There's a
416:
dealt with through the usual channels, as John notes.
707:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
469:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry
554:the ability to write about it encyclopedically.
8:
718:No comments yet. Yours could be the first!
791:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2013-06
446:In the early days it seemed like we and
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
710:
694:
332:, and then decided that our article on
71:
508:There's tons on the web, but I think
262:This week, we walked the runway with
29:
7:
495:was always the best), websites like
57:
28:
197:WikiProject Children's Literature
566:Anything else you'd like to add?
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
703:add the page to your watchlist
1:
392:history of fashion by century
807:
448:WikiProject Textile Arts
190:WikiProject Architecture
492:Style with Elsa Klensch
246:WikiProject Visual Arts
239:WikiProject Video Games
623:
611:"WikiProject report" â
168:
40:
733:What do you think of
622:
325:The Devil Wears Prada
183:WikiProject Animation
167:
39:
739:Share your feedback.
700:To follow comments,
603:"WikiProject report"
383:Polonaise_(clothing)
265:WikiProject Fashion
72:WikiProject Fashion
695:Discuss this story
680:Arbitration report
675:WikiProject report
624:
225:WikiProject Novels
204:WikiProject Comics
175:Artistic Endeavors
169:
69:WikiProject report
46:â Back to Contents
41:
711:purging the cache
665:Discussion report
587:man's best friend
578:Rouge (cosmetics)
320:Lauren Weisberger
276:. We interviewed
232:WikiProject Opera
218:WikiProject Music
211:WikiProject Films
51:View Latest Issue
798:
774:
714:
712:
706:
693:
670:Featured content
642:
634:
627:
610:
602:
270:how you can help
255:WikiProject Desk
173:
172:Previous Reports
170:
166:
157:
143:
142:
133:
132:
123:
122:
113:
112:
103:
102:
93:
92:
63:
61:
59:
806:
805:
801:
800:
799:
797:
796:
795:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
770:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
741:
730:
729:
724:
722:+ Add a comment
719:
716:
708:
701:
698:
697:
691:+ Add a comment
689:
685:
684:
683:
655:Recent research
635:
630:
628:
625:
614:
613:
608:
605:
600:
452:jewelry project
260:
259:
258:
251:
177:
176:
171:
164:
162:
158:
152:
151:
150:
149:
140:
130:
120:
110:
100:
90:
84:
81:
70:
66:
64:
54:
53:
48:
42:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
804:
802:
794:
793:
783:
782:
769:
764:
759:
754:
749:
744:
743:
742:
732:
731:
728:
727:
726:
725:
720:
717:
699:
696:
688:
687:
686:
682:
677:
672:
667:
662:
660:News and notes
657:
652:
647:
645:Traffic report
641:
629:
617:
616:
615:
606:
597:
596:
595:
583:
582:
567:
564:
555:
538:
535:
517:
500:
475:
472:
467:Unfortunately
459:
438:
429:
426:
417:
407:
398:
395:
373:
364:
351:
348:
338:
318:After reading
310:
297:
274:Article Alerts
272:and a list of
252:
250:
249:
242:
235:
228:
221:
214:
207:
200:
193:
186:
178:
174:
161:
160:
159:
148:
147:
137:
127:
117:
107:
97:
86:
85:
82:
76:
75:
74:
73:
68:
67:
65:
62:
49:
44:
43:
34:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
803:
792:
789:
788:
786:
773:
767:
762:
757:
752:
747:
740:
736:
723:
713:
704:
692:
681:
678:
676:
673:
671:
668:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
639:
633:
626:In this issue
621:
612:
604:
594:
592:
588:
579:
574:
572:
568:
565:
562:
560:
556:
553:
549:
545:
543:
539:
536:
532:
528:
524:
522:
518:
515:
511:
507:
505:
501:
498:
494:
493:
489:s, TV shows (
488:
487:
482:
480:
476:
473:
470:
466:
464:
460:
457:
453:
449:
445:
443:
439:
436:
434:
430:
427:
424:
422:
418:
414:
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
396:
393:
388:
384:
380:
378:
374:
371:
369:
365:
362:
358:
356:
352:
349:
345:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
321:
317:
315:
311:
308:
304:
302:
298:
295:
294:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
256:
248:
247:
243:
241:
240:
236:
234:
233:
229:
227:
226:
222:
220:
219:
215:
213:
212:
208:
206:
205:
201:
199:
198:
194:
192:
191:
187:
185:
184:
180:
179:
156:
146:
138:
136:
128:
126:
118:
116:
108:
106:
98:
96:
88:
87:
79:
60:
52:
47:
38:
23:
19:
735:The Signpost
734:
674:
650:In the media
638:all comments
632:26 June 2013
584:
571:Calliopejen1
569:
557:
551:
547:
540:
530:
526:
521:Calliopejen1
519:
502:
490:
484:
477:
461:
456:Gwen Stefani
440:
431:
421:Calliopejen1
419:
409:
400:
375:
366:
353:
340:
334:Anna Wintour
330:film version
323:
312:
299:
290:Calliopejen1
263:
261:
244:
237:
230:
223:
216:
209:
202:
195:
188:
181:
58:26 June 2013
772:Suggestions
542:Daniel Case
514:advertorial
479:Daniel Case
442:Daniel Case
411:Daniel Case
368:Daniel Case
314:Daniel Case
309:and others.
282:Daniel Case
548:very broad
347:motivator.
83:Share this
78:Contribute
22:2013-06-26
766:Subscribe
497:Style.com
322:'s novel
785:Category
761:Newsroom
756:Archives
601:Previous
387:Trousers
307:User:PKM
155:Mabeenot
125:LinkedIn
105:Facebook
20: |
591:archive
589:in the
581:arena!)
559:Johnbod
504:Johnbod
463:Johnbod
433:Johnbod
402:Johnbod
355:Johnbod
301:Johnbod
278:Johnbod
115:Twitter
31:Alerts.
361:WP:COI
288:, and
135:Reddit
95:E-mail
751:About
531:Vogue
527:Vogue
510:WP:RS
486:Vogue
16:<
746:Home
609:Next
145:Digg
552:and
377:PKM
342:PKM
286:PKM
153:By
80:â
787::
737:?
599:â
593:.
292:.
284:,
280:,
715:.
705:.
640:)
636:(
573::
561::
544::
523::
506::
481::
465::
458:.
444::
435::
423::
413::
404::
379::
370::
357::
344::
316::
303::
257:!
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
