2464:); resigned, as commercial interest is always with us. However, we should not think that nothing can be done. Companies will feel drawn to hiring editors if there is a strong benefit (Knowledge (XXG) has many readers) and negligible cost (gee, your hired editor gets blocked, has to try a new sock). We need a sanction which hurts, and there is one: we permanently ban articles on the hiring company. Obviously, this requires proof (to avoid legal action), and equally plainly, that is hard to get. Doc James is right about one thing: the companies that hire editors have plenty of money, and we volunteers by definition don't receive any, so the scales are heavily weighted against us. Still, the existence of a powerful sanction would be useful in curbing the worst excesses, as all companies would have to do would be to disclose their editors. Reputable companies already have no problem with that.
2693:
legitimate editors who work within sectors like GLAM and their purpose is perfectly aligned to ours making information freely available, to providing reliable citations and sharing media files from their collections. Its possible for a person to edit honestly while being paid for those edits, for the most part its a method that can successfully address some of the gender imbalance issues we read about elsewhere within signpost. What we need is to encourage honesty though identification when a person acts within their employment conditions rather than driving people into hiding with socks. This approach would make it more transarent to our readers and easier for participants to discuss issues in good faith, and it may just have the side effect of less biting of new eds who always appear to be SPA.
2670:
overly-promotional manner, it's almost impossible to delete the articles. I recently had an experience where I'd PRODded an obviously paid-for, barely notable article (but not quite promotional enough to speedily delete it); then a completely different paid editor requested undeletion and was automatically granted the request per our policy. I took it to AfD, and it went the full 3 rounds before there were sufficient comments to get it deleted. Again, the editor who requested undeletion was an incredibly obvious paid editor (his original username was that of the company!), but the "rules" required the article be reinstated. We shoot ourselves in the foot like this on a daily basis.
2444:
give us one part, while we lack volunteers for the other part. I tend to work in the arts and sometimes it seems that the only paintings worth seeing are in museums. But we are working on the sum of all paintings -- the entire oeuvre of painters, not just what hangs in the largest museums. At the end of the day, most of
Knowledge (XXG) is good, including the work of paid editors. If anything, we might be responding to the work of paid editors every time we correct peacock terms, something that happens a lot. I think that we need those paid editors to keep us responding, though I can imagine it sometimes can be depressing if you feel swamped by it, like visiting that website.
2244:
120:
110:
213:
2514:, pick an article that rings alarm bells or that is about a company or product, check it out, and nominate it for deletion if appropriate. If you have time, check the articles linking to or from it, and the contributions of the creator. If all the active editors did this, regardless of our main editing interests (mine is 18th- and 19th- century opera!) we could make a significant inroad into the problem.
2021:
their work. Although there has been talk of loosening up our attitudes towards disclosed paid editing, it's likely that for most of those involved, the incentives are less than the hazards of losing their anonymity. It would mostly just expose their work to greater scrutiny, as currently much of the time it goes undetected, which those who are attempting to promote individuals and companies prefer.
2627:, and most of the psychiatric drug articles that was well outside of medical consensus, in many cases factually incorrect. In many cases the articles or large portions thereof looked as though they had been pulled directly from the closing statements of a plantiff's attorney in a product liability lawsuit. But these inaccuracies seemed to draw only a very small level of interest or concern.
36:
160:
130:
90:
140:
100:
2424:). I helped clean up those articles in June 2014 and have been watching them since then. Anonymous editors have come back to all of them and kept on adding "information" and embellishments. I have reverted some of those edits but most are legitimate and I have no way of proving that the editor has been paid, even if I strongly suspect it.
2510:
website, more blatantly promotional (the paid editors are usually more subtle as their goal is to fly under the radar), and often contain large amounts of copy-paste. Both types of articles are detrimental to the encyclopedia, but the paid-for ones are especially pernicious. I'd urge all editors to spend an hour a week checking
1976:? The first thing we are risking is our reputation. Knowledge (XXG) is seen as an independent source. If companies and individuals can pay to have content written about them, their businesses, or their products, we are no longer independent. In October 2013, after the Wiki-PR revelations, the Wikimedia Foundation
2388:
willing to disclose a path to continue to receive compensation for editing, while providing justification for acting against those who won't. It isn't a great compromise, but by allowing clients to find editors willing to work within policy we make at least some steps towards limiting the opportunities of others.
2060:. About half of the issues I detected had already been dealt with, the accounts either being blocked or the content deleted. Whether that is good or bad I'm unsure. The cases I've picked up are likely the easier ones to detect, such as this obviously promotional addition to the article for the airline
2416:
Thanks for this great op-ed. Paid editing is a huge risk for
Knowledge (XXG). It reduces readers' trust and discourages non-paid volunteers who spend increasing amounts of time, for free, fighting back the hordes of paid editors. It creates bias in articles and conflict among editors. I fear that the
2669:
The most straightforward thing we could do to put a significant dent in paid editing would be to raise our notability threshold. A rather shocking majority of articles written by paid editors easily meets our notability threshold, and if they employ decent third party sourcing and do not write in an
2503:
Multiple, in fact too many, "references"âagain impeccably formatted. On closer inspection, they are all press releases, press release-based, listings in company directories, "interviews" with the CEO, "articles" written by the CEO/subject but with the reference disguised to obscure the real author,
2443:
Yes this is a problem. Can we do anything about it? Only what we do now - delete the most blatant ones and try to engage the mild offenders. I have noticed however that most illnesses are skewed towards taking drugs instead of diet or lifestyle changes. I guess we want both, and the pharma companies
2036:
on their accounts to identify further socks, and delete their additions. Other methods could comprise posting fake jobs on these sites to identify people offering editing services; however, this could be viewed as dishonest and thus likely not the best idea. How long this approach would be effective
2529:
WMF legal ought to be involved if paid editing breaking the terms of use of the site really threatens
Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation. I wonder if they could at least provide a FAQ about the issue. There is a fairly simple line to take, that paying for articles that are going to be deleted is throwing
2459:
I would like to second
Hispalois's praise for this excellent and thoughtful op-ed. I feel both hopeful and resigned about the issue: hopeful, because there is much that is wonderful about Knowledge (XXG), and most of it is unlikely to be affected by paid editing (as there is no benefit to be had on
2020:
The issue of those who are paid to write articles about individuals and companies is harder to address. This editing is usually done through "disposable" accounts, and even if discovered, the content is sometimes kept. Thus we are left to presume that the person behind the account is still paid for
197:
that encompassed hundreds to thousands of
Knowledge (XXG) accounts and pages, will pay for articles about specific individuals and entities. Others ask to add links to drive traffic to other websites, and yet others are jobs to remove negative content. These jobs appear to be thriving, with tens of
2692:
is too broad a terminology and we really need to distinguish between what are paid advocates and paid contributors, the first group what the this article is identifying as insidious editors who purpose is to restrict and control content being presented. The later group of paid contributors are the
2355:
I have not encountered very many examples of paid editing. However, I have had some interaction with a disclosed paid editor who did the right thing and made requests on a talk page for some amendments to the relevant article, as opposed to making the edits himself. In that case, the paid editor
2490:
appear only semi-active, if at all. I have encountered dozens of paid-for articles and successfully seen them through AfD. Sometimes they are so blatantly advertorial that they've been speedy-deleted. When I find one, I check the articles linking and from it and the other edits by the creator and
2373:
Let's start with the big question - can we stop paid editing? No. It isn't going to happen. Knowledge (XXG)'s profile is to high, we allow (and encourage) anonymous editing, and the paths to get work are many and varied. Elance and ODesk are two, but there is no way we can track the bulk of paid
2079:
in
October 2013 that "An investigation by the English Knowledge (XXG) community into suspicious edits and sockpuppet activity has led to astonishing revelations that Wiki-PR, a multi-million-dollar US-based company, has created, edited, or maintained several thousand Knowledge (XXG) articles for
201:
With a little bit of looking around, it's fairly easy to determine which account wrote what content and for how much. A number of patterns became clear. Most individuals are undeclared paid editors. Many use a single sockpuppet for one or two jobs and then move on to the next account. One editor
2427:
I am now convinced that there will always be editors willing to be sell their skills to companies, that just can't be avoided. What we can do is to deal with the clients: the PR companies and their customers. We need to make them see that paying to edit
Knowledge (XXG) under cover is unethical,
2387:
Accordingly, the next question regards what to do. We have three choices - nothing, try to prevent it completely, or find middle ground. We aren't going to be able to prevent it, and we need to try something. So the path the Terms of Use have taken is to find middle ground - allow paid editors
2509:
Paid-for articles are significantly different from other types of COI creations, e.g. people writing "do it yourself" articles about their charity, club, business, or themselves. These are usually very messy with poor formatting, bare url references or no references apart from a link to their
2028:
for a fee, seemingly oblivious to the irony of this. His suggested method would have been to patrol the major sites and request that they take down
Knowledge (XXG)-related jobs. The policies of two of the larger websites in question do not allow jobs that violate the terms of service of other
2632:
I think we would do well, especially on the medical articles, to focus on keeping them accurate and the views presented in line with medical consensus, irrespective of whether the source of the inaccuracy is paid editing, litigants attempting to tamper with the jury pool, or simply political
202:
stated that they are an experienced
Knowledge (XXG) administrator. Some were better at hiding their activities than others, with certain editors responsible for a trail of blocked accounts. Elance is just one of many e-commerce sites through which this sort of business is being transacted.
2428:
probably illegal and not a good business anyway because most of their work gets reverted or ridiculed. Industry-wide agreements should be signed to ban these practices, the same as multinationals in other sectors now have internal rules that forbid bribing government officials worldwide.--
2356:
was drawing attention to an article of significant importance that really did need a fair bit of work, including work over and above the amendments the paid editor was requesting. Regrettably, however, I still haven't had the time or the inclination to carry out most of that work.
2012:
to solve the dead-link issue once and for all. The owner is interested in having us take over its management, but I have been unable to determine whether the movement is interested in taking it on. One of the companies involved in adding links to
Knowledge (XXG) articles,
2397:
Finally, a number of editors actively follow the main paid editing sites. How effective we are is questionable - the more skilled offenders can only have articles identified about 1/3 of the time, although that increases up to 2/3 or more for the less skilled editors. -
2090:
While disclosed paid editing is a lesser issue, it is not a panacea. The problem I have with disclosed paid editing is that it often turns the attention of the core community from working on articles of higher importance to ones of lower importance. For example, editor
2037:
is unclear, as those involved would probably figure out ways to avoid detection. We could also look at efforts to generate bad press for the individuals and companies who use these services. The media, however, would likely get bored of this type of story.
2374:
editing. Even if you ignore jobs not offered on the job sites you still have Guru, Freelancer and Fiverr, to name but three of many. And paid editors such as Morning277 don't generally need to rely on job sites at all. Then there are companies like
2565:
Shorter, but more simplistic. If A pays B to edit Knowledge (XXG) in breach of the terms of use, both A and B are in false positions. B can be blocked (enforcement), but if you want to get at A, you need to combat that otherwise.
2595:
Entirely predictable result. WMF throws mountains of legal papers. Malicious editors continue business as usual; legitimate editors, scared by the WMF's legal threats and burdens, go away. WMF blames martians for the outcome.
1950:
1073:
2007:
has been set up to list all edits that remove a dead-link tag. This allows verification that spam-links are not being added as a replacementâa frequent tactic of spammers. Discussions are ongoing with respect to using
1898:
1021:
189:
accountsâthe latter a privately owned clearing house for employers to post jobs, search for freelance professionals, and solicit proposals. It was there that I discovered one of the darker sides of Knowledge (XXG).
1980:
a press release stating that undisclosed paid editing "violates numerous site policies and guidelines, including prohibitions against sockpuppetry and undisclosed conflicts of interest" and "is prohibited by our
2122:
Over the last few weeks I have looked for interest in dealing with the dozens of clandestine paid editors I have stumbled on. Is anyone willing to take on the issue of paid editing? Even though the Foundation
1235:
1222:
1196:
1157:
1131:
1118:
1105:
358:
345:
319:
280:
254:
241:
228:
1352:
475:
2298:
2293:
2068:
I have a much longer list; however, I need to first clarify whether providing this evidence on Knowledge (XXG) is allowed under the Foundation's terms of use and the English Knowledge (XXG)'s policies.
1651:
774:
2303:
1716:
1690:
1534:
1404:
1339:
1313:
839:
813:
657:
527:
462:
436:
2421:
2288:
2607:
For many years we have had all kinds of problems with COI editing, but the degree to which specific edits are considered a problem seems to be mainly determined by people's political views. The
1924:
1573:
1378:
1047:
696:
501:
2553:
2283:
2268:
2076:
1872:
1859:
1833:
1768:
1729:
1703:
1677:
1664:
1638:
1612:
1586:
1456:
1391:
1287:
1274:
1209:
995:
982:
956:
891:
852:
826:
800:
787:
761:
735:
709:
579:
514:
410:
397:
332:
194:
76:
2709:
Yes this piece is about paid advocacy rather than paid editing. Many organizations share our goals and if they pay someone to help us achieve these shared goals there is no issue with this.
2500:
The article springs fully formed in the first edit (usually by a "new" user), complete with a impeccably formatted infobox including an image of the company logo or the person if it's a bio.
2278:
1977:
1885:
1846:
1820:
1807:
1794:
1781:
1755:
1599:
1521:
1482:
1469:
1443:
1430:
1417:
1326:
1300:
1248:
1183:
1170:
1144:
1008:
969:
943:
930:
917:
904:
878:
722:
644:
605:
592:
566:
553:
540:
449:
423:
371:
306:
293:
267:
2261:
30:
Is Knowledge (XXG) for sale?: Hundreds of posted jobs offer money to edit Knowledge (XXG). These jobs appear to be thriving, with tens of thousands of dollars changing hands each month.
2334:
2083:
A year and a half later, it is clear that neither the Foundation nor the English Knowledge (XXG) has worked out how to address this issue. The first account associated with Wiki-PR,
2746:
1937:
1911:
1547:
1060:
1034:
670:
2255:
55:
44:
2308:
1365:
1261:
488:
384:
2420:
In the Spanish-language version, the media has helped us uncover articles clearly authored by public-relation companies, for example about singers and other celebrities (see
1742:
1625:
1508:
1495:
865:
748:
631:
618:
2648:
Articles often become liabilities - sounding boards of negative content - when anyone can edit the article. It's a double-edged sword, not a single-edged sell out. --
2017:, is using the Knowledge (XXG) logo to promote itself, so WMF Legal and Community Affairs may consider addressing what appears to be breach of our logo trademark.
2004:
2799:
2492:
2138:
On-wiki remedies are hampered by our community policies. It is currently unclear if an editor is allowed to openly discuss specific cases on the encyclopedia. Our
2029:
websites. I emailed them inquiring about this possibility and they agreed to take down the first user I reported. Now to look at doing this on a larger scale.
21:
2774:
2769:
2764:
2135:
feels that they have no role in handling paid advocacy at this point in timeâpaid editing is not prohibited by policy, as they responded to me by email.
2131:
informed me that they do not have the staff to take this on and hopes the community will become involved in enforcement. The English Knowledge (XXG)'s
2759:
2611:
articles were completely taken over for years by people engaged in litigation against Bayer and JNJ. Information was posted to the articles on
2483:
2146:
policy takes precedence, and it does not clarify if we are allowed to link to external sites suspected of being involved in paid advocacy. An
2066:"SpiceJet has overhauled its network starting March 30, 2014. The new Summer Schedule focuses on the most important aspect of travel - you."
2175:
193:
On Elance, hundreds of posted jobs offer money to edit Knowledge (XXG). Companies like the now-former Wiki-PR, which was involved in a
1986:
2158:
2132:
2754:
2478:
I am also grateful for this op-ed. The pharmaceutical company/product articles are probably the most frequently highlighted because
2243:
49:
35:
17:
2487:
2479:
2116:
2722:
2053:
2142:
guideline may state that editors should "not edit Knowledge (XXG) in the interests of your external relationships", but the
2127:
undisclosed paid editing, it is unclear who is supposed to enforce this and what mechanisms we have to detect it. The WMF's
2115:, and others are interested in providing this sort of service for their clients or themselves. While we can handle some,
2033:
2124:
2151:
2072:
This is not the first time that Knowledge (XXG) has come across an extensive network of clandestine paid advocacy. The
2726:
2128:
2032:
Another possible measure would be to keep a list of sockmasters known to be involved in paid editing, regularly run
2571:
2535:
1756:
PR firm accused of editing Knowledge (XXG) for government clients; can Knowledge (XXG) predict the stock market?
879:
PR firm accused of editing Knowledge (XXG) for government clients; can Knowledge (XXG) predict the stock market?
2780:
2656:
2482:
keeps a very eagle eye on those subjects. However, blatant paid editing is rife here, and unfortunately both
2469:
2108:
2730:
2700:
2679:
2663:
2642:
2600:
2584:
2575:
2560:
2539:
2523:
2519:
2473:
2453:
2437:
2407:
2365:
2225:
2221:
2096:
2065:
2025:
178:
1639:
Foundation takes aim at undisclosed paid editing; Greek Knowledge (XXG) editor faces down legal challenge
762:
Foundation takes aim at undisclosed paid editing; Greek Knowledge (XXG) editor faces down legal challenge
2638:
2567:
2547:
2531:
2057:
2511:
2718:
2697:
2649:
2433:
2361:
2633:
activism. Bad medical information is equally harmful irrespective of what motivates the editor.
2143:
181:
to an attack page he had one of his friends write about me. In turn, this page linked to Fergus'
168:
2465:
2049:
1392:
2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
515:
2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
93:
2515:
2449:
2330:
1509:
On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it
632:
On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it
123:
1691:
More discussion of paid advocacy, upcoming arbitrator elections, research hackathon, and more
814:
More discussion of paid advocacy, upcoming arbitrator elections, research hackathon, and more
2675:
2634:
2040:
So who are their customers? According to FergusM1970, some of his clients included academic
175:
2229:
2147:
2139:
2087:, appeared during my recent investigations, suggesting that they may still be in business.
103:
2620:
2608:
2461:
2403:
2112:
2084:
1982:
133:
159:
2710:
2694:
2429:
2357:
153:
2157:
So is Knowledge (XXG) for sale? Unfortunately, the answer currently appears to be yesâ
2793:
2597:
2581:
2557:
2092:
2000:
2204:
2170:
are those of the authors only; responses and critical commentary are invited in the
1587:
With paid advocacy in its sights, the Wikimedia Foundation amends their terms of use
710:
With paid advocacy in its sights, the Wikimedia Foundation amends their terms of use
2616:
2445:
113:
1678:
Foundation to Wiki-PR: cease and desist; Arbitration Committee elections starting
801:
Foundation to Wiki-PR: cease and desist; Arbitration Committee elections starting
143:
2671:
2624:
2612:
2375:
2045:
2041:
2399:
2104:
1522:
Turkish Knowledge (XXG) censorship; "Can Knowledge (XXG) survive?"; PR editing
645:
Turkish Knowledge (XXG) censorship; "Can Knowledge (XXG) survive?"; PR editing
1834:
Showdown as featured article writer openly solicits commercial opportunities
1717:
Ada Lovelace Day, paid advocacy on Knowledge (XXG), sidebar update, and more
957:
Showdown as featured article writer openly solicits commercial opportunities
840:
Ada Lovelace Day, paid advocacy on Knowledge (XXG), sidebar update, and more
2504:
articles in prominent publications which do not mention the subject at all.
167:
professing to be a Knowledge (XXG) administrator, redacted to comply with
2080:
paying clients using a sophisticated array of concealed user accounts."
2061:
2103:, which resulted in much greater involvement than the subject deserves.
1574:
Shifting values in the paid content debate; cross-language bot detection
1249:
Concealment, data journalism, a non-pig farmer, and some Bluetick Hounds
697:
Shifting values in the paid content debate; cross-language bot detection
372:
Concealment, data journalism, a non-pig farmer, and some Bluetick Hounds
2100:
2009:
182:
1457:
Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Knowledge (XXG)
580:
Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Knowledge (XXG)
186:
164:
2417:
very existence of Knowledge (XXG) may be in danger in the long term.
2378:- how do we identify who they hire, much less who their clients are?
2208:
2167:
2119:
does not have the ability to handle hundreds of daily requests.
1730:
Wiki-PR's extensive network of clandestine paid advocacy exposed
853:
Wiki-PR's extensive network of clandestine paid advocacy exposed
1873:
License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
1860:
Wikimedia announcements, Knowledge (XXG) advertising, and more!
1626:
Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
1613:
PR agencies commit to ethical interactions with Knowledge (XXG)
1236:
A "billionaire battle" on Knowledge (XXG): Sex, lies, and video
996:
License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
983:
Wikimedia announcements, Knowledge (XXG) advertising, and more!
749:
Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
736:
PR agencies commit to ethical interactions with Knowledge (XXG)
359:
A "billionaire battle" on Knowledge (XXG): Sex, lies, and video
54:
2014:
1994:
if we disapprove of this activity, can we do anything about it
1704:
Vice on Wiki-PR's paid advocacy; Featured list elections begin
1379:
Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
827:
Vice on Wiki-PR's paid advocacy; Featured list elections begin
502:
Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
1431:
Court-ordered article redaction, paid editing, and rock stars
1405:
English Knowledge (XXG) community's conclusions on talk pages
554:
Court-ordered article redaction, paid editing, and rock stars
528:
English Knowledge (XXG) community's conclusions on talk pages
2242:
1275:
Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
1223:
Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
398:
Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
346:
Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
211:
34:
2024:
One of FergusM1970's last comments on Knowledge (XXG) was
1197:
Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
320:
Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
1600:
Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Moderator: William Beutler
723:
Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Moderator: William Beutler
2346:
2339:
2319:
2150:
seeking to clarify one aspect of this issue is ongoing
1912:
Account used to create paid corporate entries shut down
1847:
Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
1035:
Account used to create paid corporate entries shut down
970:
Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
1989:
to allowing paid advocates to edit in article space".
1821:
Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
1808:
Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
1470:
Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage
1366:
Trying to find COI or paid editors? Just read the news
944:
Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
931:
Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
593:
Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage
489:
Trying to find COI or paid editors? Just read the news
205:
I've been grappling with a couple of questions since:
1444:
Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
1184:
Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
567:
Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
307:
Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
1665:
WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
788:
WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
2344:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
2174:. Editors wishing to submit their own op-ed should
2003:appears to be fairly straightforward to address. A
1951:German Knowledge (XXG) introduces incentive scheme
1795:Does Knowledge (XXG) pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
1782:Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
1353:Some strange people edit Knowledge (XXG) for money
1074:German Knowledge (XXG) introduces incentive scheme
918:Does Knowledge (XXG) pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
905:Does Knowledge (XXG) Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
476:Some strange people edit Knowledge (XXG) for money
2495:). There are two tell-tale signs of paid editing:
1769:Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
892:Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
198:thousands of dollars changing hands each month.
1743:Q&A on Public Relations and Knowledge (XXG)
866:Q&A on Public Relations and Knowledge (XXG)
2228:for Derwick Associates in a lengthy thread on
1340:Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
1145:Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth
463:Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
268:Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth
1886:Report of diploma mill offering pay for edits
1009:Report of diploma mill offering pay for edits
8:
1119:"Knowledge (XXG) and the assault on history"
242:"Knowledge (XXG) and the assault on history"
2220:FergusM1970 provided a partial client list
1985:." Jimmy Wales has similarly stated that "
1301:WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
424:WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
2800:Knowledge (XXG) Signpost archives 2015-02
2552:Or stated shorter: what was the point of
1938:Proposal to pay editors for contributions
1899:AstroTurf PR firm discovered astroturfing
1314:Knowledge (XXG) for promotional purposes?
1061:Proposal to pay editors for contributions
1022:AstroTurf PR firm discovered astroturfing
437:Knowledge (XXG) for promotional purposes?
2556:if the WMF isn't going to enforce them?
1992:The next and more difficult question is
1262:How billionaires rewrite Knowledge (XXG)
385:How billionaires rewrite Knowledge (XXG)
158:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) Signpost
2347:
2323:
2196:
2054:Institute of Cosmetic and Laser Surgery
1483:Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
1288:Paid editing with political connections
1132:The "largest con in corporate history"?
606:Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
411:Paid editing with political connections
255:The "largest con in corporate history"?
70:
1925:Editing for hire leads to intervention
1048:Editing for hire leads to intervention
2580:That's an excellent pointâthank you.
29:
7:
2530:money away, with reputational risk.
174:A few months ago, now-banned editor
1652:Special report: Contesting contests
775:Special report: Contesting contests
1974:So what is wrong with paid editing
1956:
1943:
1930:
1917:
1904:
1891:
1878:
1865:
1852:
1839:
1826:
1813:
1800:
1787:
1774:
1761:
1748:
1735:
1722:
1709:
1696:
1683:
1670:
1657:
1644:
1631:
1618:
1605:
1592:
1579:
1566:
1553:
1540:
1527:
1514:
1501:
1488:
1475:
1462:
1449:
1436:
1423:
1410:
1397:
1384:
1371:
1358:
1345:
1332:
1319:
1306:
1293:
1280:
1267:
1254:
1241:
1228:
1215:
1202:
1189:
1176:
1163:
1150:
1137:
1124:
1111:
1079:
1066:
1053:
1040:
1027:
1014:
1001:
988:
975:
962:
949:
936:
923:
910:
897:
884:
871:
858:
845:
832:
819:
806:
793:
780:
767:
754:
741:
728:
715:
702:
689:
676:
663:
650:
637:
624:
611:
598:
585:
572:
559:
546:
533:
520:
507:
494:
481:
468:
455:
442:
429:
416:
403:
390:
377:
364:
351:
338:
325:
312:
299:
286:
273:
260:
247:
234:
56:
28:
2329:These comments are automatically
2159:but we can and should change this
1560:
683:
1535:A quick way of becoming an admin
1496:Community voices on paid editing
1210:Enough time left to vote! IP ban
1106:How paid editors squeeze you dry
658:A quick way of becoming an admin
619:Community voices on paid editing
333:Enough time left to vote! IP ban
229:How paid editors squeeze you dry
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
2026:an offer to detect paid editors
1171:Fuzzy-headed government editing
294:Fuzzy-headed government editing
2491:invariably find several more (
2340:add the page to your watchlist
1:
2731:00:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
2171:
2166:The views expressed in these
2701:03:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
2680:02:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
2664:01:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
2643:15:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2601:11:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2585:20:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2576:20:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2561:18:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2540:11:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2524:09:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2474:09:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2454:08:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2438:07:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2408:01:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
2366:01:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1561:Is Knowledge (XXG) for sale?
684:Is Knowledge (XXG) for sale?
71:Is Knowledge (XXG) for sale?
2460:many topics, such as mine,
2816:
2686:The problem lies in that
2554:changing the terms of use
2484:WikiProject Organizations
222:Does Knowledge (XXG) pay?
2226:admitted to paid editing
2111:via Havas Lynx Medical,
2129:community advocacy team
2109:Alexion Pharmaceuticals
2747:looking for new talent
2337:. To follow comments,
2247:
2097:disclosed paid editing
2095:previously engaged in
216:
171:
169:Knowledge (XXG) policy
39:
2246:
2133:Arbitration Committee
2058:Ventura Film Festival
1418:Women's history month
541:Women's history month
215:
195:paid advocacy scandal
162:
38:
2512:Special:NewPagesFeed
2488:WikiProject Business
2480:WikiProject Medicine
2333:from this article's
2140:conflict of interest
2117:Wikiproject Medicine
1158:The oligarchs' socks
281:The oligarchs' socks
2148:request for comment
2324:Discuss this story
2299:WikiProject report
2294:Arbitration report
2248:
2050:Derwick Associates
1548:Meet a paid editor
671:Meet a paid editor
217:
172:
45:â Back to Contents
40:
2493:egregious example
2348:purging the cache
2304:Technology report
2203:For example, the
1967:
1966:
1749:25 September 2013
1327:Dog days gone bad
1307:27 September 2020
1294:27 September 2020
1203:26 September 2021
872:25 September 2013
450:Dog days gone bad
430:27 September 2020
417:27 September 2020
326:26 September 2021
50:View Latest Issue
2807:
2783:
2715:
2661:
2654:
2568:Charles Matthews
2551:
2548:Charles Matthews
2532:Charles Matthews
2351:
2349:
2343:
2322:
2289:Featured content
2266:
2258:
2251:
2233:
2222:on his user page
2218:
2212:
2205:terms of service
2201:
2184:
2172:comments section
1958:
1945:
1932:
1919:
1906:
1893:
1880:
1867:
1854:
1841:
1828:
1815:
1802:
1789:
1776:
1775:12 November 2012
1763:
1750:
1737:
1724:
1711:
1698:
1685:
1684:20 November 2013
1672:
1659:
1646:
1645:19 February 2014
1633:
1632:26 February 2014
1620:
1607:
1594:
1581:
1568:
1555:
1542:
1529:
1516:
1503:
1490:
1477:
1476:2 September 2015
1464:
1463:2 September 2015
1451:
1438:
1425:
1412:
1399:
1386:
1373:
1360:
1347:
1334:
1321:
1308:
1295:
1282:
1269:
1268:29 November 2020
1256:
1255:28 December 2020
1243:
1242:28 February 2021
1230:
1217:
1204:
1191:
1190:29 November 2021
1178:
1165:
1152:
1139:
1138:20 February 2023
1126:
1113:
1087:
1086:
1081:
1068:
1055:
1042:
1029:
1016:
1003:
990:
977:
964:
951:
938:
925:
912:
899:
898:12 November 2012
886:
873:
860:
847:
834:
821:
808:
807:20 November 2013
795:
782:
769:
768:19 February 2014
756:
755:26 February 2014
743:
730:
717:
704:
691:
678:
665:
652:
639:
626:
613:
600:
599:2 September 2015
587:
586:2 September 2015
574:
561:
548:
535:
522:
509:
496:
483:
470:
457:
444:
431:
418:
405:
392:
391:29 November 2020
379:
378:28 December 2020
366:
365:28 February 2021
353:
340:
327:
314:
313:29 November 2021
301:
288:
275:
262:
261:20 February 2023
249:
236:
220:
219:Related articles
214:
156:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
2815:
2814:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2779:
2777:
2772:
2767:
2762:
2757:
2750:
2739:
2738:
2711:
2657:
2650:
2621:Alendronic acid
2609:Fluoroquinolone
2545:
2462:natural history
2422:this discussion
2353:
2345:
2338:
2327:
2326:
2320:+ Add a comment
2318:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2259:
2256:4 February 2015
2254:
2252:
2249:
2237:
2236:
2219:
2215:
2202:
2198:
2193:
2182:
2113:GlaxoSmithKline
2099:on the article
1970:
1969:
1968:
1963:
1905:5 February 2007
1723:16 October 2013
1710:16 October 2013
1697:23 October 2013
1658:29 January 2014
1567:4 February 2015
1437:1 December 2018
1281:1 November 2020
1177:30 January 2022
1125:4 December 2023
1112:31 January 2024
1028:5 February 2007
846:16 October 2013
833:16 October 2013
820:23 October 2013
781:29 January 2014
690:4 February 2015
560:1 December 2018
404:1 November 2020
300:30 January 2022
248:4 December 2023
235:31 January 2024
224:
223:
218:
212:
207:
157:
151:
150:
149:
148:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
57:4 February 2015
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2813:
2811:
2803:
2802:
2792:
2791:
2778:
2773:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2741:
2740:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2704:
2703:
2689:"paid editors"
2683:
2682:
2646:
2645:
2629:
2628:
2604:
2603:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2527:
2526:
2506:
2505:
2501:
2497:
2496:
2476:
2441:
2440:
2425:
2418:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2328:
2325:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2311:
2306:
2301:
2296:
2291:
2286:
2284:Traffic report
2281:
2276:
2271:
2269:News and notes
2265:
2253:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2235:
2234:
2213:
2195:
2194:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2125:does not allow
1971:
1965:
1964:
1961:
1960:
1954:
1948:
1947:
1941:
1935:
1934:
1931:14 August 2006
1928:
1922:
1921:
1918:9 October 2006
1915:
1909:
1908:
1902:
1896:
1895:
1889:
1883:
1882:
1876:
1870:
1869:
1863:
1857:
1856:
1850:
1844:
1843:
1837:
1831:
1830:
1824:
1818:
1817:
1811:
1805:
1804:
1798:
1792:
1791:
1788:1 October 2012
1785:
1779:
1778:
1772:
1766:
1765:
1759:
1753:
1752:
1746:
1740:
1739:
1736:9 October 2013
1733:
1727:
1726:
1720:
1714:
1713:
1707:
1701:
1700:
1694:
1688:
1687:
1681:
1675:
1674:
1671:8 January 2014
1668:
1662:
1661:
1655:
1649:
1648:
1642:
1636:
1635:
1629:
1623:
1622:
1616:
1610:
1609:
1603:
1597:
1596:
1590:
1584:
1583:
1577:
1571:
1570:
1564:
1558:
1557:
1551:
1545:
1544:
1538:
1532:
1531:
1525:
1519:
1518:
1512:
1506:
1505:
1502:12 August 2015
1499:
1493:
1492:
1489:12 August 2015
1486:
1480:
1479:
1473:
1467:
1466:
1460:
1454:
1453:
1447:
1441:
1440:
1434:
1428:
1427:
1421:
1415:
1414:
1408:
1402:
1401:
1395:
1389:
1388:
1382:
1376:
1375:
1369:
1363:
1362:
1356:
1350:
1349:
1343:
1337:
1336:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1320:30 August 2020
1317:
1311:
1310:
1304:
1298:
1297:
1291:
1285:
1284:
1278:
1272:
1271:
1265:
1259:
1258:
1252:
1246:
1245:
1239:
1233:
1232:
1226:
1220:
1219:
1216:29 August 2021
1213:
1207:
1206:
1200:
1194:
1193:
1187:
1181:
1180:
1174:
1168:
1167:
1161:
1155:
1154:
1151:31 August 2022
1148:
1142:
1141:
1135:
1129:
1128:
1122:
1116:
1115:
1109:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1090:
1084:
1083:
1077:
1071:
1070:
1064:
1058:
1057:
1054:14 August 2006
1051:
1045:
1044:
1041:9 October 2006
1038:
1032:
1031:
1025:
1019:
1018:
1012:
1006:
1005:
999:
993:
992:
986:
980:
979:
973:
967:
966:
960:
954:
953:
947:
941:
940:
934:
928:
927:
921:
915:
914:
911:1 October 2012
908:
902:
901:
895:
889:
888:
882:
876:
875:
869:
863:
862:
859:9 October 2013
856:
850:
849:
843:
837:
836:
830:
824:
823:
817:
811:
810:
804:
798:
797:
794:8 January 2014
791:
785:
784:
778:
772:
771:
765:
759:
758:
752:
746:
745:
739:
733:
732:
726:
720:
719:
713:
707:
706:
700:
694:
693:
687:
681:
680:
674:
668:
667:
661:
655:
654:
648:
642:
641:
635:
629:
628:
625:12 August 2015
622:
616:
615:
612:12 August 2015
609:
603:
602:
596:
590:
589:
583:
577:
576:
570:
564:
563:
557:
551:
550:
544:
538:
537:
531:
525:
524:
518:
512:
511:
505:
499:
498:
492:
486:
485:
479:
473:
472:
466:
460:
459:
453:
447:
446:
443:30 August 2020
440:
434:
433:
427:
421:
420:
414:
408:
407:
401:
395:
394:
388:
382:
381:
375:
369:
368:
362:
356:
355:
349:
343:
342:
339:29 August 2021
336:
330:
329:
323:
317:
316:
310:
304:
303:
297:
291:
290:
284:
278:
277:
274:31 August 2022
271:
265:
264:
258:
252:
251:
245:
239:
238:
232:
225:
221:
210:
209:
208:
147:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2812:
2801:
2798:
2797:
2795:
2782:
2776:
2771:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2748:
2744:
2732:
2728:
2724:
2720:
2716:
2714:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2702:
2699:
2696:
2691:
2690:
2685:
2684:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2665:
2662:
2660:
2655:
2653:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2631:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2605:
2602:
2599:
2594:
2593:
2586:
2583:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2559:
2555:
2549:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2508:
2507:
2502:
2499:
2498:
2494:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2466:Chiswick Chap
2463:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2451:
2447:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2426:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2414:
2409:
2405:
2401:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2377:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2350:
2341:
2336:
2332:
2321:
2310:
2307:
2305:
2302:
2300:
2297:
2295:
2292:
2290:
2287:
2285:
2282:
2280:
2277:
2275:
2272:
2270:
2267:
2263:
2257:
2250:In this issue
2245:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2217:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2200:
2197:
2190:
2186:
2179:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2160:
2155:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2136:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2120:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2088:
2086:
2081:
2078:
2075:
2070:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2038:
2035:
2030:
2027:
2022:
2018:
2016:
2011:
2006:
2005:specific page
2002:
2001:link spamming
1999:The issue of
1997:
1995:
1990:
1988:
1987:he is opposed
1984:
1979:
1975:
1962:
1959:
1953:
1952:
1946:
1944:24 April 2006
1940:
1939:
1933:
1927:
1926:
1920:
1914:
1913:
1907:
1901:
1900:
1894:
1892:12 March 2007
1888:
1887:
1881:
1875:
1874:
1868:
1866:26 April 2010
1862:
1861:
1855:
1853:16 April 2012
1849:
1848:
1842:
1840:30 April 2012
1836:
1835:
1829:
1827:30 April 2012
1823:
1822:
1816:
1810:
1809:
1803:
1797:
1796:
1790:
1784:
1783:
1777:
1771:
1770:
1764:
1758:
1757:
1751:
1745:
1744:
1738:
1732:
1731:
1725:
1719:
1718:
1712:
1706:
1705:
1699:
1693:
1692:
1686:
1680:
1679:
1673:
1667:
1666:
1660:
1654:
1653:
1647:
1641:
1640:
1634:
1628:
1627:
1621:
1615:
1614:
1608:
1602:
1601:
1595:
1589:
1588:
1582:
1576:
1575:
1569:
1563:
1562:
1556:
1550:
1549:
1543:
1537:
1536:
1530:
1524:
1523:
1517:
1511:
1510:
1504:
1498:
1497:
1491:
1485:
1484:
1478:
1472:
1471:
1465:
1459:
1458:
1452:
1446:
1445:
1439:
1433:
1432:
1426:
1424:31 March 2019
1420:
1419:
1413:
1411:30 April 2019
1407:
1406:
1400:
1394:
1393:
1387:
1381:
1380:
1374:
1368:
1367:
1361:
1359:2 August 2020
1355:
1354:
1348:
1346:2 August 2020
1342:
1341:
1335:
1333:2 August 2020
1329:
1328:
1322:
1316:
1315:
1309:
1303:
1302:
1296:
1290:
1289:
1283:
1277:
1276:
1270:
1264:
1263:
1257:
1251:
1250:
1244:
1238:
1237:
1231:
1229:25 April 2021
1225:
1224:
1218:
1212:
1211:
1205:
1199:
1198:
1192:
1186:
1185:
1179:
1173:
1172:
1166:
1164:27 March 2022
1160:
1159:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1140:
1134:
1133:
1127:
1121:
1120:
1114:
1108:
1107:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:More articles
1089:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1076:
1075:
1069:
1067:24 April 2006
1063:
1062:
1056:
1050:
1049:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1030:
1024:
1023:
1017:
1015:12 March 2007
1011:
1010:
1004:
998:
997:
991:
989:26 April 2010
985:
984:
978:
976:16 April 2012
972:
971:
965:
963:30 April 2012
959:
958:
952:
950:30 April 2012
946:
945:
939:
933:
932:
926:
920:
919:
913:
907:
906:
900:
894:
893:
887:
881:
880:
874:
868:
867:
861:
855:
854:
848:
842:
841:
835:
829:
828:
822:
816:
815:
809:
803:
802:
796:
790:
789:
783:
777:
776:
770:
764:
763:
757:
751:
750:
744:
738:
737:
731:
725:
724:
718:
712:
711:
705:
699:
698:
692:
686:
685:
679:
673:
672:
666:
660:
659:
653:
647:
646:
640:
634:
633:
627:
621:
620:
614:
608:
607:
601:
595:
594:
588:
582:
581:
575:
569:
568:
562:
556:
555:
549:
547:31 March 2019
543:
542:
536:
534:30 April 2019
530:
529:
523:
517:
516:
510:
504:
503:
497:
491:
490:
484:
482:2 August 2020
478:
477:
471:
469:2 August 2020
465:
464:
458:
456:2 August 2020
452:
451:
445:
439:
438:
432:
426:
425:
419:
413:
412:
406:
400:
399:
393:
387:
386:
380:
374:
373:
367:
361:
360:
354:
352:25 April 2021
348:
347:
341:
335:
334:
328:
322:
321:
315:
309:
308:
302:
296:
295:
289:
287:27 March 2022
283:
282:
276:
270:
269:
263:
257:
256:
250:
244:
243:
237:
231:
230:
206:
203:
199:
196:
191:
188:
184:
180:
177:
170:
166:
161:
155:
154:James Heilman
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
2743:The Signpost
2742:
2712:
2688:
2687:
2658:
2651:
2647:
2617:Isotretinoin
2528:
2516:Voceditenore
2442:
2354:
2279:In the media
2273:
2262:all comments
2216:
2199:
2181:
2165:
2156:
2137:
2121:
2089:
2082:
2073:
2071:
2039:
2031:
2023:
2019:
1998:
1993:
1991:
1983:Terms of Use
1973:
1972:
1957:18 July 2005
1955:
1949:
1942:
1936:
1929:
1923:
1916:
1910:
1903:
1897:
1890:
1884:
1879:15 June 2009
1877:
1871:
1864:
1858:
1851:
1845:
1838:
1832:
1825:
1819:
1812:
1806:
1801:23 July 2012
1799:
1793:
1786:
1780:
1773:
1767:
1760:
1754:
1747:
1741:
1734:
1728:
1721:
1715:
1708:
1702:
1695:
1689:
1682:
1676:
1669:
1663:
1656:
1650:
1643:
1637:
1630:
1624:
1619:11 June 2014
1617:
1611:
1606:11 June 2014
1604:
1598:
1593:18 June 2014
1591:
1585:
1580:30 July 2014
1578:
1572:
1565:
1559:
1554:4 March 2015
1552:
1546:
1541:17 June 2015
1539:
1533:
1528:24 June 2015
1526:
1520:
1515:15 July 2015
1513:
1507:
1500:
1494:
1487:
1481:
1474:
1468:
1461:
1455:
1450:23 June 2017
1448:
1442:
1435:
1429:
1422:
1416:
1409:
1403:
1396:
1390:
1383:
1377:
1372:28 June 2020
1370:
1364:
1357:
1351:
1344:
1338:
1331:
1325:
1318:
1312:
1305:
1299:
1292:
1286:
1279:
1273:
1266:
1260:
1253:
1247:
1240:
1234:
1227:
1221:
1214:
1208:
1201:
1195:
1188:
1182:
1175:
1169:
1162:
1156:
1149:
1143:
1136:
1130:
1123:
1117:
1110:
1104:
1103:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1080:18 July 2005
1078:
1072:
1065:
1059:
1052:
1046:
1039:
1033:
1026:
1020:
1013:
1007:
1002:15 June 2009
1000:
994:
987:
981:
974:
968:
961:
955:
948:
942:
935:
929:
924:23 July 2012
922:
916:
909:
903:
896:
890:
883:
877:
870:
864:
857:
851:
844:
838:
831:
825:
818:
812:
805:
799:
792:
786:
779:
773:
766:
760:
753:
747:
742:11 June 2014
740:
734:
729:11 June 2014
727:
721:
716:18 June 2014
714:
708:
703:30 July 2014
701:
695:
688:
682:
677:4 March 2015
675:
669:
664:17 June 2015
662:
656:
651:24 June 2015
649:
643:
638:15 July 2015
636:
630:
623:
617:
610:
604:
597:
591:
584:
578:
573:23 June 2017
571:
565:
558:
552:
545:
539:
532:
526:
519:
513:
506:
500:
495:28 June 2020
493:
487:
480:
474:
467:
461:
454:
448:
441:
435:
428:
422:
415:
409:
402:
396:
389:
383:
376:
370:
363:
357:
350:
344:
337:
331:
324:
318:
311:
305:
298:
292:
285:
279:
272:
266:
259:
253:
246:
240:
233:
227:
226:
204:
200:
192:
173:
2781:Suggestions
2635:Formerly 98
2625:Varenicline
2613:Finasteride
2376:WikiExperts
2331:transcluded
2046:Tony Succar
2044:, composer
2042:Jerome Katz
2015:WikiLinkPro
1762:13 May 2013
1398:31 May 2020
1385:31 May 2020
885:13 May 2013
521:31 May 2020
508:31 May 2020
176:FergusM1970
2105:IMS Health
2085:Morning277
2056:, and the
1814:7 May 2012
937:7 May 2012
163:A user on
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2015-02-04
2775:Subscribe
2713:Doc James
2430:Hispalois
2358:Bahnfrend
2335:talk page
2185:s editor.
2034:CheckUser
1978:published
2794:Category
2770:Newsroom
2765:Archives
2723:contribs
2180:Signpost
2093:BlackCab
2077:reported
2074:Signpost
2062:SpiceJet
124:LinkedIn
104:Facebook
20: |
2309:Gallery
2101:A2 milk
2010:WebCite
183:Twitter
114:Twitter
2672:Risker
2230:WP:ANI
2168:op-eds
2144:outing
2052:, the
187:Elance
179:linked
165:Elance
134:Reddit
94:E-mail
2760:About
2727:email
2698:garra
2652:Green
2400:Bilby
2274:Op-ed
2209:oDesk
2191:Notes
2176:email
68:Op-ed
16:<
2755:Home
2719:talk
2695:Gnan
2676:talk
2639:talk
2598:Nemo
2572:talk
2536:talk
2520:talk
2486:and
2470:talk
2450:talk
2446:Jane
2434:talk
2404:talk
2362:talk
2224:and
2178:the
2152:here
185:and
144:Digg
2745:is
2207:of
152:By
79:â
2796::
2729:)
2725:¡
2721:¡
2678:)
2641:)
2623:,
2619:,
2615:,
2596:--
2582:Ed
2574:)
2558:Ed
2538:)
2522:)
2472:)
2452:)
2436:)
2406:)
2364:)
2161:.
2154:.
2107:,
2064::
2048:,
1996:?
2749:.
2717:(
2674:(
2659:C
2637:(
2570:(
2550::
2546:@
2534:(
2518:(
2468:(
2448:(
2432:(
2402:(
2360:(
2352:.
2342:.
2264:)
2260:(
2232:.
2211:.
2183:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
