89:
32:
286:, so don't do it. If you must zap, it's better to redirect to a dummy redirect target in the same namespace. If you add newly-created dummy redirect targets to the list above, you'll avoid needless duplication.
254:
But then, it's not needed. Zapping is reversible. Contested zapping is dealt with the same as any other contested edit -- polite discussion on talk, escalating if needed to an RfC or mediation.
280:
wielding baseball bats. Before we do that, we can start by blocking the problem user's account or IP; escalate to IP range blocking; and if necessary, pursue a court order.
162:
Follow "What links here" for the zapped page and correct any links, exercising good judgement. If the problem page is caught quickly, there should be few or none of these.
222:
still be discussed on the zapped talk page, but such debate is not demanded. We have enough to fight about. Zapping consumes a minimum of editor attention.
126:
311:
54:
98:
Zapping is not a policy. Some editors may object strongly to it. Before you zap, it is suggested you thoroughly familiarize yourself with
39:
114:. Also be aware that simply redirecting a page to anywhere inappropriate is likely to be construed as vandalism and reverted on sight.
296:
260:
Many edits can be done in bad faith. Calling one's own vandalism "zapping" does not legitimize it. All vandalism is reversible.
49:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
208:
The action is completely reversible. Mistaken, hasty, or bad-faith zapping can be fixed quickly -- and at
110:
zapping is appropriate, it's not. If you're not willing to take total responsibility for your own action,
46:
266:
This is called edit warring, and is always bad. Fortunately, we already have methods in place to track
63:
50:
198:
The process is completely transparent. Readers and editors who wind up in the
Sandbox can follow the
125:
228:
305:
17:
231:
and a major source of
Community strife. This is the wiki way of doing things.
192:
No tagging, subpage creation, or other overhead; nothing to close or archive.
118:
In short, Don't. Zap. Ever. This is a Good-Faith proposal of a bad idea.
276:
Some users will not be discouraged by anything short of a visit by the
274:
Does not provide sufficient disincentive to creators of poor content.
241:
out of the way of spiders, which is the immediate and important goal.
202:
link to the original page and thus to its talk. History is preserved.
136:
Redirect the page to a dummy redirect target in the same namespace:
165:
Document the zapping on the original page's talk page, including
83:
26:
270:
edits and deal with problem users. These apply here as well.
124:
102:
of the current policies that affect your intended action.
132:
Zapping a page means to perform the following actions:
71:
8:
297:Knowledge (XXG):Experimental Deletion
7:
284:Redirecting across namespaces is bad
25:
312:Knowledge (XXG) failed proposals
87:
30:
237:Zapping gets the problem page
1:
264:Can be reversed in bad faith.
246:Potential issues with zapping
328:
61:
258:Can be done in bad faith.
53:or initiate a thread at
129:
190:No extra manual work:
186:Any user can do this.
178:Advantages to zapping
128:
159:in the edit summary.
252:No prior consensus.
216:No debate required:
18:Knowledge (XXG):ZAP
278:WP Black Bag Squad
130:
169:for zapping, and
123:
122:
82:
81:
16:(Redirected from
319:
91:
90:
84:
74:
55:the village pump
34:
33:
27:
21:
327:
326:
322:
321:
320:
318:
317:
316:
302:
301:
293:
248:
206:No catastrophe:
184:No bureaucracy:
180:
88:
78:
77:
70:
66:
58:
31:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
325:
323:
315:
314:
304:
303:
300:
299:
292:
289:
288:
287:
281:
271:
261:
255:
247:
244:
243:
242:
232:
223:
213:
203:
201:
193:
187:
179:
176:
175:
174:
163:
160:
151:
150:
149:
146:
143:
140:
121:
120:
106:If you aren't
92:
80:
79:
76:
75:
67:
62:
59:
45:
44:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
324:
313:
310:
309:
307:
298:
295:
294:
290:
285:
282:
279:
275:
272:
269:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
249:
245:
240:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
217:
214:
211:
207:
204:
199:
197:
196:No confusion:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
181:
177:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
157:
152:
147:
144:
141:
138:
137:
135:
134:
133:
127:
119:
116:
115:
113:
109:
103:
101:
96:
93:
86:
85:
73:
69:
68:
65:
60:
56:
52:
51:the talk page
48:
43:
41:
36:
29:
28:
19:
283:
277:
273:
267:
263:
257:
251:
238:
234:
229:VotingIsEvil
225:
219:
215:
209:
205:
195:
189:
183:
170:
166:
155:
154:
131:
117:
111:
107:
105:
104:
99:
97:
94:
37:
218:The action
212:later date.
200:redirect=no
112:don't do it
226:No voting:
38:This is a
47:Consensus
42:proposal.
306:Category
291:See also
64:Shortcut
239:quickly
167:reasons
95:WARNING
72:WP:ZAP
40:failed
235:Fast:
171:sign
153:Put
108:sure
268:all
220:can
210:any
156:zap
100:all
308::
148:].
145:].
142:].
139:].
173:.
57:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
