755:
which, although published in 1970, carried an imprint date of 1969; Anomalopus truncatus (Peters, 1876 ) was established in a different genus from
Anomalopus in a work which, although published in 1876, carried an imprint date of 1877." If that were the example being followed, a name saying "Moore, " would imply that the publication says 1885, but there is reason to believe it is some other, unspecified year. I think that that's not what is happening here, so it has nothing to do with what the Code recommends. As for determining what the actual date is in the first place, the ICZN is a little complicated, but basically it's "the earliest day on which the work is demonstrated to be in existence as a published work", meaning multiple Code-compliant copies that have been distributed, similar to the ICNafp.
177:
433:
146:
226:
208:
486:
392:
in the context of "medusoids". "Medusoids" does appear in quotation marks in the paper, suggesting that the authors are hedging their bets a bit; i.e., they are discussing fossils that have been classified as medusoids, but aren't definitively taking a position on whether the fossils mentioned are or
339:
listed it as in
Animalia, then incertae sedis from there down to the genus itself. I put the existing "Animalia/incertae sedis" claim in the new taxonomy template. However, some of the theorized possibilities listed in the main article for the genus are not actually animals. Should its parent perhaps
357:
2. I wasn't sure what to do about the taxonomy template's "extinct" field. I guess at least the species is almost certainly extinct, since we apparently haven't kept finding these things, but the genus? Again, I'd guess extinct, but... what if it's just some jellyfish (I know that's not a genus, but
574:
Square brackets around a date in a taxonomic authority citation, like "Moore, " typically indicates that the actual date of publication is different from the date printed on the publication itself. So "Moore, 1885" and "Moore, " convey different information. Not sure what the
Knowledge standard is
407:
For taxa known from fossils, you can pretty safely set "extinct=yes". If a genus is known from fossils as well as extant species a quick check on a search engine should turn up sources discussing the extant species. The absence of a † in a manual taxobox shouldn't be taken to indicate that extinct
754:
to give the date specified within a work in brackets, but the actual date outside of the brackets: "Examples. Ctenotus alacer Storr, 1970 ("1969"), or
Ctenotus alacer Storr, 1970 , or Ctenotus alacer Storr, 1970 (imprint 1969), or Ctenotus alacer Storr, 1970 (not 1969), was established in a work
708:
According to the archive.org version Parts II and III are dated Nov. 28, 1881 and Sept. 5, 1887 (see bottom of pages 89 and 199). Assuming those are manuscript dates, this is consistent with the titles pages dated 1882 and 1888 on pages 340 and 342. When Part II was actually published is another
551:
In the preexisting
Taxobox, the authorities in the "Genus" and "Species" sections were both given as "Moore, 1882", but the one in the "Synonyms" section was given as "Moore, ". I don't know what the square brackets mean there, so I went in search of information about it. I found something about
724:
For ICNafp names, it's definitely the date it was distributed. For printed matter, the Code says "Art. 29.1. Publication is effected, under this Code, by distribution of printed matter (through sale, exchange, or gift) to the general public or at least to scientific institutions with generally
393:
are not actually medusoids. The source currently in the article for the statement "jellyfish (although this is considered unlikely)" actually says "not considered by
Glaessner (1979) to be undoubtedly a jellyfish", which is not at all the same thing as "considered unlikely to be a jellyfish".
358:
that doesn't mean that its genus would necessarily be extinct)? Or even some weird mark left by a jellyfish? But as far as I can see from the documentation, "extinct" is just yes/no; I'm not sure if it's appropriate or even possible to instead set it to "probably" or "unknown" or whatever.
657:
I'm not at all sure where the 1882 (instead of 1879) date comes from, but I'm pretty sure the 1894 date can not be correct, and given the uncertainties around the date of one of Moore's publications I'm not surprised there may be uncertain about another one of them (the one where
361:
For what it's worth, I'm thinking "Incertae sedis/Life" and "extinct=yes", but instead of making it that way, I decided to just keep things as close as possible to the way they were in the pre-automated article, and raise my questions here. -
109:
312:. It's a genus defined by a fossil from hundreds of millions of years ago, and apparently there's not even a remote consensus about what it is (jellyfish? trace fossil? microbial colony? etc. etc. etc.). There was no
286:
This talk page can be used to discuss issues with the automated taxobox system that are common to the entire system, not just one of its templates. Discussions of this nature prior to 2017 can be found at
50:
556:, but nothing about having them around the date. So, I guessed that maybe it was just a stylistic choice by some previous Wikipedian, and removed them, leaving just "Moore, 1885".
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
137:
985:
85:
980:
975:
296:
249:
344:
91:
233:
213:
35:
937:
779:
354:, e.g. "mud volcano or other sedimentary structure", but the article reads like those theories are now thought to be very unlikely.
619:
The first source in the article (Hewitson & Moore) has a title page with a publication date of 1879, and on page 186 the genus
631:
at archive.org gives the publication date as 1879-1888. 1882 appears on page 340 (apparently the title page for the last? part).
559:
Was this correct of me, or should it have the square brackets around the date? If the latter, what do they indicate? Thanks. -
288:
31:
933:
872:
831:
775:
80:
694:
It means the work was actually published in 1885, but the date printed on the publication is different (often earlier).
323:
188:
835:
809:. The taxonomy is discussed in the various articles. Is there somewhere where it is mentioned without explanation? —
71:
610:
532:
397:
145:
104:
627:
are being presented as newly described. Hewitson & Moore is a 3 part publication; the version linked from the
509:
725:
accessible libraries." The printed date is often earlier, particularly for older works bound in multiple parts.
156:
443:
17:
680:, thanks, but: Which is which? That is, does mean "published in 1885", or "publication itself says 1885"? -
956:
921:
880:
843:
734:
439:
871:
Sorry, my mistake; I didn't "create" the taxonomy template as I wrote above, I corrected the version that
245:
643:
326:, but ran into a couple things that I'm not sure I did correctly, and don't know how to "really" handle.
194:
400:(questionably a jellyfish), but "Animalia/incertae sedis" works as well. The non-animal hypotheses for
925:
496:
695:
677:
576:
699:
667:
600:
580:
413:
61:
960:
941:
884:
866:
847:
819:
783:
764:
738:
719:
703:
689:
671:
584:
568:
512:
477:
417:
371:
248:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
952:
914:
910:
876:
839:
730:
161:
76:
862:
815:
760:
715:
316:
160:
57:
384:, "Animalia/incertae sedis" seems appropriate. The Paleobiology Database lists the parent as
802:
542:
333:
158:
685:
564:
367:
709:
matter. What is the crucial date, when the work is printed or when it is distributed? —
852:
Ah, that would make sense, although I'm puzzled by the timeline. I'm sure I checked the
408:
status is uncertain for a taxon that the article describes as being known from fossils.
663:
473:
409:
238:
969:
948:
806:
242:
858:
826:
811:
756:
726:
711:
308:
I've recently been updating things to the automated system, and today I dealt with
350:
instead? I should note here that some of the theorized possibilities aren't even
798:
794:
681:
591:
560:
379:
363:
309:
616:. That aside, there is something funky going on with the dates for this moth.
853:
790:
525:
469:
906:
947:
This is more usefully raised at the
Pyrosome article, so I've posted at
634:
GBIF (and
Lepindex) give "Moore, 1894" as the authority for the species
396:
Based on what I've seen I think you could set the parent template to be
225:
207:
388:(i.e. Animalia) citing a 2004 paper. The 2004 paper actually discusses
385:
504:
295:
Those familiar with the system prior to mid-2016 are advised to read
856:
article and find it hard to believe I missed the taxobox error. —
750:
What the ICZN says is not exactly what people typically do. You're
304:
Template/Taxonomy for something about which very little is known?
774:
So the UTC clade is a clade of algae but there’s no taxonomy?
427:
170:
162:
26:
901:
In
English Knowledge they don’t do the taxonomy right.
642:
as "Moore, 1882". So something is probably wrong there.
465:
654:(which is obviously an error in some way at LepIndex).
548:, and there's a bit that I'm not sure if I did right:
237:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
36:automated taxobox system as a whole – not just one
838:, when the taxobox in the article didn't work.
18:Knowledge talk:Automated taxobox system/convert
8:
552:having square brackets around the authority
650:, while treating it as a junior synonym of
834:may have been commenting before I created
202:
905:There are 3 genera in the Pyrosomatidae (
729:is better able to comment on ICZN names.
646:does have "Moore, " as the authority for
187:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
204:
949:Talk:Pyrosome#Family is not monotypic
789:I don't understand the question. The
596:for monotypic genera, you should use
7:
528:(a monotypic genus of moths) to use
176:
174:
638:, and GBIF gives the authority for
193:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
520:Authority date in square brackets?
258:Knowledge:WikiProject Tree of Life
25:
986:WikiProject Tree of Life articles
261:Template:WikiProject Tree of Life
231:This page is within the scope of
981:NA-importance taxonomic articles
976:Project-Class taxonomic articles
932:so we need to fix the taxonomy.
484:
431:
404:don't seem to be well supported.
224:
206:
175:
144:
51:Click here to start a new topic.
289:Template talk:Automatic taxobox
961:06:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
942:01:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
885:06:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
875:had created that didn't work.
867:16:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
848:16:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
820:06:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
784:02:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
765:14:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
739:09:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
720:06:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
704:03:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
690:01:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
672:01:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
585:00:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
575:for instances like these ...
569:00:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
322:template for it, so I created
1:
513:20:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
478:18:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
468:to the module in production.
424:Edit request 9 September 2024
418:21:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
398:Template:Taxonomy/Scyphozoa/?
372:18:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
252:and see a list of open tasks.
48:Put new text under old text.
345:Taxonomy/Incertae sedis/Life
324:Template:Taxonomy/Mawsonites
920:there is also 2 subfamily (
836:Template:Taxonomy/UTC clade
458:to reactivate your request.
446:has been answered. Set the
56:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1002:
219:
201:
86:Be welcoming to newcomers
444:Module:Automated taxobox
234:WikiProject Tree of Life
922:Pyrosomatinae (animal)
81:avoid personal attacks
297:Notes for "old hands"
138:Auto-archiving period
464:Hello, please apply
648:Corcobara thwaitesi
934:Atlas Þə Biologist
873:Atlas Þə Biologist
832:Atlas Þə Biologist
793:is a group within
776:Atlas Þə Biologist
291:
264:taxonomic articles
189:content assessment
92:dispute resolution
53:
897:Pyrosome taxonomy
662:) was desribed).
611:Automatic taxobox
533:Automatic taxobox
515:
462:
461:
285:
280:
279:
276:
275:
272:
271:
169:
168:
72:Assume good faith
49:
16:(Redirected from
993:
926:Pyrostremmatinae
865:
830:
818:
803:Trebouxiophyceae
718:
623:and the species
615:
609:
605:
599:
595:
547:
541:
537:
531:
511:
507:
499:
492:
488:
487:
453:
449:
435:
434:
428:
383:
349:
343:
338:
332:
329:1. The existing
321:
315:
266:
265:
262:
259:
256:
228:
221:
220:
210:
203:
180:
179:
178:
171:
163:
149:
148:
139:
27:
21:
1001:
1000:
996:
995:
994:
992:
991:
990:
966:
965:
899:
857:
824:
810:
772:
710:
652:C. angulipennis
625:C. angulipennis
613:
607:
603:
597:
589:
545:
539:
535:
529:
524:I just updated
522:
505:
497:
485:
483:
451:
447:
432:
426:
377:
347:
341:
336:
330:
319:
313:
306:
263:
260:
257:
254:
253:
165:
164:
159:
136:
98:
97:
67:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
999:
997:
989:
988:
983:
978:
968:
967:
964:
963:
930:
929:
918:
898:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
771:
768:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
706:
674:
655:
632:
617:
521:
518:
517:
516:
498:P.I. Ellsworth
460:
459:
436:
425:
422:
421:
420:
405:
394:
305:
302:
282:
278:
277:
274:
273:
270:
269:
267:
250:the discussion
229:
217:
216:
211:
199:
198:
192:
181:
167:
166:
157:
155:
154:
151:
150:
100:
99:
96:
95:
88:
83:
74:
68:
66:
65:
54:
45:
44:
41:
40:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
998:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
973:
971:
962:
958:
954:
953:Peter coxhead
950:
946:
945:
944:
943:
939:
935:
927:
923:
919:
916:
912:
908:
904:
903:
902:
896:
886:
882:
878:
877:Peter coxhead
874:
870:
869:
868:
864:
860:
855:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
840:Peter coxhead
837:
833:
828:
823:
822:
821:
817:
813:
808:
807:Chlorophyceae
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
787:
786:
785:
781:
777:
769:
767:
766:
762:
758:
753:
740:
736:
732:
731:Peter coxhead
728:
723:
722:
721:
717:
713:
707:
705:
701:
697:
693:
692:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
673:
669:
665:
661:
656:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
630:
626:
622:
618:
612:
602:
593:
588:
587:
586:
582:
578:
573:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
557:
555:
549:
544:
534:
527:
519:
514:
510:
508:
502:
501:
500:
491:
482:
481:
480:
479:
475:
471:
467:
457:
454:parameter to
445:
441:
437:
430:
429:
423:
419:
415:
411:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
381:
376:
375:
374:
373:
369:
365:
359:
355:
353:
346:
335:
327:
325:
318:
311:
303:
301:
300:
298:
292:
290:
283:
268:
251:
247:
244:
240:
236:
235:
230:
227:
223:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
205:
200:
196:
190:
186:
182:
173:
172:
153:
152:
147:
143:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
108:
106:
102:
101:
93:
89:
87:
84:
82:
78:
75:
73:
70:
69:
63:
59:
58:Learn to edit
55:
52:
47:
46:
43:
42:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
931:
900:
773:
751:
749:
660:C. thwaitesi
659:
651:
647:
639:
636:angulipennis
635:
628:
624:
620:
558:
553:
550:
523:
495:
494:
489:
463:
455:
440:edit request
401:
389:
360:
356:
351:
328:
307:
294:
293:
284:
281:
255:Tree of Life
246:tree of life
243:phylogenetic
232:
214:Tree of Life
195:WikiProjects
185:project page
184:
141:
103:
30:This is the
915:pyrosomella
911:pyrostremma
799:Ulvophyceae
797:comprising
795:Chlorophyta
538:instead of
970:Categories
601:Speciesbox
448:|answered=
402:Mawsonites
390:Mawsonites
340:be set to
310:Mawsonites
854:UTC clade
791:UTC clade
770:UTC clade
696:Esculenta
678:Esculenta
664:Plantdrew
640:Corcobara
629:Corocbara
621:Corcobara
577:Esculenta
526:Corcobara
490:Completed
410:Plantdrew
352:organisms
142:41.5 days
94:if needed
77:Be polite
32:talk page
907:pyrosoma
752:supposed
644:Lepindex
466:this fix
317:taxonomy
241:and the
239:taxonomy
105:Archives
62:get help
859:Jts1882
827:Jts1882
812:Jts1882
757:Dyanega
727:Dyanega
712:Jts1882
543:Taxobox
386:Metazoa
334:taxobox
606:, not
191:scale.
924:and
682:Rwv37
592:Rwv37
561:Rwv37
452:|ans=
438:This
380:Rwv37
364:Rwv37
183:This
110:Index
90:Seek
38:page.
957:talk
938:talk
913:and
881:talk
863:talk
844:talk
816:talk
805:and
780:talk
761:talk
735:talk
716:talk
700:talk
686:talk
668:talk
581:talk
565:talk
554:name
474:talk
470:Od1n
414:talk
368:talk
79:and
506:ed.
450:or
442:to
972::
959:)
951:.
940:)
909:,
883:)
846:)
801:,
782:)
763:)
737:)
702:)
688:)
670:)
614:}}
608:{{
604:}}
598:{{
583:)
567:)
546:}}
540:{{
536:}}
530:{{
503:,
493:.
476:)
456:no
416:)
370:)
348:}}
342:{{
337:}}
331:{{
320:}}
314:{{
140::
132:,
128:,
124:,
120:,
116:,
112:,
60:;
955:(
936:(
928:)
917:)
879:(
861:|
842:(
829::
825:@
814:|
778:(
759:(
733:(
714:|
698:(
684:(
676:@
666:(
594::
590:@
579:(
563:(
472:(
412:(
382::
378:@
366:(
299:.
197::
134:6
130:5
126:4
122:3
118:2
114:1
107::
64:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
