Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots/Archive 9

31: 1755:"Why does the bot exclude administrators?" Because it's intended solely to stop pagemove vandals and it's assumed that by definition administrators can't be vandals (perhaps they could be, but then we'd have far more to worry about than just page moves). Of course ordinary users are "allowed" and even expected to help protect against vandalism. There's no intent to discriminate, but excluding admins is simply practical and sensible. 1733:' bot? Furthermore, why does the 'bot exclude administrators? It seems to operate on the premise that ordinary users are not allowed to revert vandalism. Speaking as an editor who reverted vandalism as an ordinary user here, and who still reverts vandalism (including page move vandalism) as an ordinary user elsewhere, I find that premise unacceptable. The more ordinary users who help in protecting against vandalism, the better. 1849:

block indefinitely, ALL blocks get removed when the half hour's up. That's the way the software works. So there's no way for the bot to block for a short time and still allow other admins to block indefinitely, unless they laboriously unblock and reblock (which is downright unwise if Willy's bot gets unblocked even momentarily). In any case, I do review any blocks the bot has made (immediately, if I'm around at the time). --

1863:

all the bases, Curps. As tragic as it may be, if, for whatever reason, you decide to leave the Knowledge (XXG) community, the bot unfortunately has to stop running on your own account. I'm trying to think... Curps, is there any way for you to add some kind of form system that allow you to log unblock requests? Although such a form would be subject to abuse, it's just a suggestion. --

1035:. It doesn't actually do anything yet except flood the channel with new post notifications and assign them a score, which I need to make it go into in much, much more detail whilst doing. But, it's a start. :) It needs to check for a lot more conditions before it actually does the investigation part of the botting... :/ 1887:

Unfortunately, due to the very nature of what the bot is fighting against, it needs to run at all times, 24/7. I have now added a feature to make the bot post a notice to an admin discussion page (AN/I) when it does a block. Unfortunately this failed the last time because the page move vandal moved

1848:

The problem is the way multiple blocks work. In recent cases, when the bot has blocked, very often another admin or two blocks a minute or two later (unfortunately, at 75 pagemoves per minute, even a minute's delay can be very expensive). However, if the bot blocks for half an hour and other admins

1666:

I tend to think the bot should be OK in this instance as long as the set number of moves is higher than what any normal editor can reasonably be expected to make and also lower than or equal to the number of moves Willy usually makes in a minute. It may be tricky to find that balance; Curps should be

563:

I don't know that I need a bot flag because my bot does not make changes. That is my current understanding of the designation. Please inform me otherwise. R3m0t, I am working on improving the percentage of actual grammar mistakes caught. The biggest problem seems to be abbreviations being clipped

527:

Hi I've put together a little bot that will read all the pages linked to from the Main Page and parse them searching for bad grammar. I then take the result file and copy paste it to my user talk page. It does NOT make any changes to any pages or even have the capability to do so. I have more info

1834:

Why does the bot need to do an indefinite block? How about a block for something like half an hour, if it detects 3 pagemoves a minute? It could then put an automated notice on a page where other admins could review these blocks and see they should be upgraded to a permanent block, or unblocked as

1342:

In context of the rest of the discussion linked to it is clear that that isn't a spellbot at all. It's 'bot that deliberately introduces subtle vandalism into articles, that is simply styled as a spellbot either for ironic effect or to mislead. As such, it really indicates nothing at all about why

1050:

Approved for running for one month testing. May apply bot flag after that. Nothing against you, Veratien, it's a great idea, but as you said, it's still experimental, and want your bot to be more solid before it applies for bot flag. I'm trying to take the stance that this page is a proposal page

1862:

Again, I support the running of this bot, but I recommend a trial run period of two weeks. This bot should immediately stop running if no one is taking care of it. By "taking care of it," that user must have access to the physical code of the bot, and whatever account it is run on. Just covering

1218:

I have been doing a number of what I call disambiguation drives manually, and would now like permission to trial a bot to see if it is a more efficient means of doing this. The bot has a user account ready (Robchurch-A) and would run manually-assisted running solve_disambiguation on selected items.

1010:

How is that going to work? Will it google for things and look for text that is basically identical, or what? By the way, don't forget that alot of copyvio'ers use the "borrowed" material as a source, but it's not neccesarily listed properly. And, it's a good idea to put the {{nothanks}} template on

920:

I've contacted Brion Vibber, who has done some checking. As I understand xyr explanation: The wrong version of the page was listed in the server database as the current version, causing the server to revert to that version when the article was renamed. This is a database problem and nothing to do

1928:

By the way a good filter is that not to block users with "old" edits, at least I would guess most vandals register a new account and don't go on and edit (usefully) some article, then wait for weeks. Old edits can be checked by checking the oldest edits of the user. A reasonable "minimal user age"

1443:

I did indeed unblock fvw right away. However, I am running the bot 24/7, which means it is occasionally unsupervised. This is unfortunate, but I am arguing urgent practical necessity. For those who weren't involved in the events of August 26, please see the move log and AN/I discussion for that

197:

I am currently developing a tool to help me with my manual edits (especially RC/New Pages patrol), i.e. I visit a page and tell it manually what to do with it. Planned features are: adding (categorised) stub tags, if this works I'll probably add VfD nomination (I think the current process is a bit

318:

The bot only makes an edit if anything is to be changed, which will be once a day because it also updates the "this information was last updated on" line below the table. Of course it would be possible to not do that, but I think it is important to tell the reader of the table whether the data is

1940:

The problem with this suggestion is that pagemove vandal bots are moving pages at a rate of 75-90 pages per minute. They have to be stopped immediately. In the time it takes to look up a user's edit history a lot of damage can be done (especially given Knowledge (XXG)'s very uncertain response

1386:

Traditional bots do leisurely janitorial work: fixing an interwiki link or a bit of text there. However, the block bot is being run as an emergency measure in response to the events of August 26, when "Willy on Wheels" pagemove vandalism reached a new and much more dangerous level. It was

2008:

Admins are immune from the bot, because the bot is intended to work against vandals and we have to assume that admins aren't vandals. As for other bots, well, do any of them do page moves? If they do, they should do them at a reasonable pace under normal circumstances. If anyone writes a

356:, wrote a severity of highest critical unpatched vulnerability for each product and date of oldest vulnerability? I underestand that K. Sperling prepared script, that only update number of vulnerabilites, so we would still must manually update dates (and severity at browsers). -- 803:

After successful test runs, SANDBOT has now been extended to clean the tutorial and template sandboxes once per day as well. This increases the maximum number of edits per day (some sandboxes are not frequently used, and so the edits to clean them will be null edits) to 24.

1051:

to run a program on the Knowledge (XXG), and they have to have a reasonable and solid proposal for running their bot. This is only to demonstrate the proof of burden and that a user will be responsible enough to take care of their bot and not let it go run amok. --

1101:

blocked this bot indefinitely earlier for messing up, but Flacus assured me any issues have been resolved, and AllyUnion did indicate there would be no particular problem if an eye was kept on it. If anything goes wrong, I'm (at least partially) responsible.

265:

The bot fetches all Secunia pages linked to in the article, counts the critical advisory, and updates that number in the article accordingly. It also updates the footnote that specifies when the table was last updated. The secunia.com terms and conditions

1667:

careful to check and quickly unblock any legitimate user affected by it. The problem, which occurs to me, is that the bot may ironically end up blocking people who are trying to move pages back to where they should be. Is there a way to deal with this?

1911:

I agree with your suggestion, AllyUnion. It shouldn't be that hard to do, even if it was just a PHP and MySQL setup on an external website. All that would be needed is the form, he could look in the MySQL database manually to see the requests.

1780:

PS, the latest Willy vandalism does 75 pagemoves per minute. If the block bot is disabled and we end up with many hundred pages to be moved back, can we count on you to pitch in? And then do it all over again, nine times in one day? --

301:

I'm not too experienced with Python (I prefer Perl), but it looks like the script will edit the page each time it is run, regardless of if the numbers have changed or not. Would it be possible to change this so it only edits if needed?

1063:

Cool idea, but I don't actually think this one should run with the Bot flag at all. It won't have a high edit rate, and it'll strongly benefit from having the odd user look over its shoulder. Make sure to also have it add an entry to

1796:

use on the Knowledge (XXG), and it should have its own account. Also, since this Bot is running 24/7, but Curps can't be monitoring it 24/7, there should be some provision for a couple of other trusted editors to help supervise it.

1804:

Also, since this bot has the possibility of false positives (someone with a broadband connection and using a tabbed browser like Mozilla can do plenty of edits in a minute), there should be greater publicity--perhaps a mention in

961:

template. I might also add in the ability for it to detect and revert common types of obvious vandalism (also detailed on the user page), but this will need extensive testing on a dummy Wiki before it would ever come near here.

1800:

For one example of where a change might be needed--The odds are the Willy vandal probably reads many of the discussions about him, and so he now knows that he needs to throttle down the number of page moves that he does.

1745:

Fvw did a very large number of moves in rapid succession and triggered the threshold; I have since set the threshold even higher. Also, he was only blocked because I inadvertently left him off the list of admins because

1791:

First of all, I would like to say that I have no objections to this Bot, for the most part. On the other hand, a bot is a bot is a bot. I think that every bot used on the Knowledge (XXG) should have approval for

528:

at My user talk page. Since it seemed to be the norm I created an account GrammarGremlin for running the bot. My own account is the username Tubelius. Do I need to get any special permisions for running this?

792:. See the user page for full details of SANDBOT. Like VFDBOT, SANDBOT will be making at most 2 edits per day. This is because it only performs two of the sandbox cleaning tasks that used to be performed by 1835:

a false positive. This would immediately chill willy's actions, and a half an hour false positive isn't going to kill anyone. As admins are whitelisted, they wouldn't be caught for reverting damage. --

1764:

is very quiet compared to AN and AN/I and far fewer eyes see the discussions here. I posted originally to AN/I and fvw has started a discussion at AN, so it's best to consolidate the discussion there.

999:

I'm going to try and account for that. It'll check the article for, "fair use", "public domain", and other buzzwords that will reduce the score, and check the source article for the same as well. --

859:

be requested for this account, as it is intended, per the name, to be for tasks that require large numbers of edits. For details of current work, see the user page. For details of planned work, see

365:

Currently it updates the number of unpatched vulnerabilities marked "less critical" and above, and also the date of the oldest of those, if any. However it only understands the format that is used in

141:

Any bot which requires human review of its edits is not a bot but an alternate interface, and should not provoke a ban. Besides, it's courteous to ask them about it first on their talk page. Also see

1011:

their user page. Maybe make a version that notes that it was done by a bot, and give a link to your talk page, so they can ask about it. I think you could do this and do it quite well, personally. --

1726: 122:

has been running an unauthorised spelling bot. I've blocked him for 24 hours, and to be fair I couldn't see him doing any damage, but can someone with a bit more knowledge have a word with him?

911:

modify it at the same time. There's no way to do that using the normal web interface as far as I know. I suspect a server error. Perhaps some edits are not being displayed in the history.

315:

Well, I would have preferred Perl myself, but the pywikipedia modules that handle all the low-level details of interacting with Knowledge (XXG) are written in Python, so I just used those :-)

463:

What is the bot's name? Approved for test run for one week after posting of bot's name on this page. May apply for bot status after one week test run duration if no complaints are made. --

1971:

I always do this right away, if I'm around at the time. The problem is the bot has to be run 24/7. Hopefully by posting to AN/I, other admins will be able to take a look if I can't. --

1699:. Exercise of administrator privileges by a tool that does not require a human to explicitly pull the trigger each time is not something that should be accepted as a matter of routine. 907:

separate entries in the history, in any case. What we are seeing here is one. Indeed, I cannot think of a way to actually do what appears to have been done here — to rename an article

680:

Hello. I exist. I'm not doing anything automatically, yet. So my owner doesn't want a 'bot flag for me, yet. My owner will let you know when I'm ready to start doing real work.

210:. This is therefore not a request for a bot flag (as I think it shouldn't have one; they're still low-volume user-initiated edits), but a general check for concern. Similarly, like 1397: 1388: 552:

If you are the person making the changes, you should make them under your own account. I cannot see that many of the mistakes it shows are real - are you improving this? :)

852: 746: 723: 1888:

AN/I itself and turned it into a redirect (!) (I thought such pages were protected against moves?). This should ensure that any accidental block will not last long. --

1720: 811:

SANDBOT is still cleaning the template sandboxes, but has been configured to not clean the main and tutorial sandboxes. The number of edits per day is thus reduced.

1683:

When it comes to running automated tools under the aegis of accounts that have been granted administrator privileges by the community, I'm largely in agreement with

206:

create any new pages (other than VfD discussions once this feature is added). It is therefore believed that the tool does not have the problems as listed under

1198:

Please setup the user page for the bot. After that is done, you may run your bot for one week. If no complaints are made, you may apply for a bot flag. --

1716: 1498: 448:

with the python script to verify that I know what I'm doing (turns out I do, on the first try). I would like to let the bot walk all referring pages.

1413: 1368: 657: 441:) to do. All I want to do is make a bot which strafes the wiki entries which use the phrase "Harley Davidson" and change it to "Harley-Davidson". 386:

I would like to run pywikipediabot with bot status to fix links to disambig pages here on en. This will use the solve_disambiguation.py script. –

1453:

The bot has made the following blocks. Each time it reacted faster than a human could have. So it has a fairly strong track record of success.

1293:

for a practical example of why automated spellchecking is bad. This particular spellbot has produced such gems as "SpongeBob SquarePants" -: -->

708:

I approve for it to be run until a solution can be fixed with my own bots. Unfortunately, I don't have a server to run my bots at the moment. --

1031:

As I said above, the basic way it'll work is detailed above. I've already made some changes to things, and the basics are currently running in

1256:

Approved for running for a duration for one week. If no complaints are made, may apply for a bot flag. Please make sure you list your bot at

1229:

The name is rather very close to your own, and it does not assist in clearly spelling out that it is a bot rather than a sockpuppet account. --

1161:

The details of what it does should be posted here and its userpage. Without that understanding, we don't know what the bot is intended for. --

846: 1929:(age of oldest edit) and "minimal number of non-suspicious edits" should be guessed upon. Would minimalise blocking real editors. My 0.02. -- 1038:

I will be making a template that the bot will append to peoples user_talk pages to point out that copyrighted material is bad, mmmkay. :p --

957:

once it's finished. The basic idea is detailed on its user page. In short, it'll hunt out copyvios in new articles and change them to the

860: 1582: 1711:

does page moves, with a delay in between each operation. I have no way of knowing whether it will be hit by this 'bot. Indeed, how is

119: 1747: 1735:

Certainly this 'bot should not be approved unless its operation is more thoroughly documented, and the concerns raised here addressed.

1675:(copied from the administrator's noticeboard to here, as it deals with proposed modifications to the 'bot before community approval. 764: 731: 97: 89: 84: 1708: 1692: 842: 836: 1290: 2031:

NekoDaemon will be scheduled to empty categories using the soft redirect of {{categoryredirect}}. Code is in testing phases. --

72: 67: 59: 1624: 697:. See the user page for full details of VFDBOT. Since VFDBOT will be making at most 2 edits per day, hiding the changes from 366: 259: 727: 986: 619: 198:

tedious to do manually), of course with user-supplied reasoning texts. I would like to emphasise the fact that this tool is

2009:

pagemove-revert bot to undo willy damage, which needs to do a lot of pagemoves quickly, they could perhaps let me know. --

796:, and those not as frequently. More sandbox cleaning tasks can be added, or a greater frequency configured, upon request. 760: 432: 1638: 1696: 1184:

I would like to use pywikipedia's solve_disambiguation.py to facilitate my disambiguation work. I created an account (

1032: 1610: 319:

current or not. Note that the edit is marked as minor if only the date is updated, or as a normal edit otherwise. --

1554: 693:

After two successful manual test runs, VFDBOT is now scheduled to be automatically run, editing under the aegis of

391: 353: 38: 134:

are you sure its a bot. it could just be a user using a spellcheck plugin in thier browser or something similar.

1540: 788:

After successful manual test runs, SANDBOT is now scheduled to be automatically run, editing under the aegis of

1512: 521: 1568: 1596: 116: 1526: 428:

As both a grammar-nazi and a motorcycle enthusiast, seeing "Harley Davidson" just irks the crap out of me.

431:

It's not a guy, Mr. Harley Davidson. It was William Harley and the three Davidson brothers who made "The

400: 1306: 179: 47: 17: 1688: 1653: 883:

I'm a little concerned that the bot has blanked all of the comments in the process of moving VfD to AfD

789: 698: 694: 681: 674: 276: 1806: 269:

seem to permit such usage of their site, since their information is not redistributed, only linked to.

1750:

listed him as "inactive"; I have since added all "inactive" administrators to the "do not block" list.

1185: 878: 608:

I would like to run this bot to fix links to redirects to lists (see the page for an explanation). ~~

1954:

How about running the checks after blocking, and unblocking if it appears to have been a mistake? --

1824: 127: 497: 215: 2048: 2035: 1992: 1867: 1323: 1311: 1268: 1261: 1233: 1202: 1165: 1141: 1055: 875: 822: 771: 712: 633: 585: 565: 542: 529: 504: 467: 414: 338: 218:

during development (providing manual reverts if the bot malfunctions). It is being developed using

211: 153: 142: 921:

with the 'bot. The exact same thing would have happened had anyone renamed the article manually.

1842: 1829: 1448: 1425: 1017: 982: 615: 357: 113: 106: 272:

I plan to run the bot manually at first, and if it works well, run it as a cron job once a day.

954: 947: 1941:

time, and the fact that it takes two page fetches to see a user's earliest contributions). --

1712: 1291:

http://pseudodoxia.flawlesslogic.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Spellbot

1153: 754: 1761: 1364: 1319:

We only allow manually assisted spellchecking bots, or bots that generate automatic stats. --

1257: 207: 1404: 1243: 1212: 900: 1839: 1810: 1128: 175: 123: 1065: 629:

Approved for test run for one week, then may apply for bot status after no complaints. --

1127:, which is pywikipediabot using the double redirect fixer. It will be run occasionally. 165:

BTW In case someone wanted to do this as well: Everyking already unblocked. -- User:Docu

2045: 2032: 1989: 1933: 1864: 1704: 1684: 1668: 1320: 1308: 1265: 1248: 1230: 1220: 1199: 1162: 1138: 1124: 1098: 1052: 872: 819: 768: 709: 661: 630: 582: 539: 501: 464: 411: 394: 352:

I'd like this idea. I thank to K. Sperling. Would it be possible to apply this also on

335: 255: 233: 1687:(see above). All of my automated tools run under the aegis of unprivileged accounts ( 1294:"Sponger Smartypants", or "placing intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Cuba" -: --> 1955: 1914: 1375: 1296: 1189: 1107: 1072: 1039: 1012: 1000: 977: 966: 610: 370: 320: 303: 283: 214:, I doubt the desirability of a separate user account. The bot will be tested on the 146: 135: 2051: 2038: 2013: 1995: 1975: 1958: 1945: 1892: 1870: 1853: 1785: 1773: 1671: 1335: 1326: 1314: 1299: 1271: 1251: 1236: 1223: 1205: 1192: 1168: 1156: 1144: 1131: 1110: 1079: 1058: 1042: 1022: 1003: 990: 969: 934: 925: 915: 890: 825: 774: 715: 636: 623: 588: 568: 545: 538:

Approved for test run for two weeks. Do you plan to apply for a bot flag or not? --

532: 507: 483: 470: 457: 438:

I've been fixing such mistakes when I come upon them manually, but there are a lot (

417: 403: 360: 341: 306: 294: 240: 226: 186: 1736: 1729:), or any other mass rename done by developers under role accounts, will be hit by 1676: 1436: 1348: 1150: 922: 912: 864: 818:

The template sandboxes are not edited very much... at least from what I can see. --

812: 805: 797: 793: 750: 735: 702: 480: 454: 291: 232:

Stub tag addition has been implemented, I'll be editing some pages with it. See my

183: 1094: 1090: 581:

It seems his bot is generation of stats on the most common errors of grammar. --

202:

planned to have any spidering or other autonomous/high-volume features and will

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

975:

Sounds like it might catch pages with a long fair-use quote. But good idea. ~~

2010: 1972: 1942: 1889: 1850: 1836: 1782: 1770: 1730: 1649: 1634: 1620: 1606: 1592: 1578: 1564: 1550: 1536: 1522: 1508: 1494: 1480: 1467: 1457: 1445: 1422: 1332: 1331:

But as Susvolans pointed out, nobody allowed it, it was done as vandalism. --

931: 887: 602: 553: 237: 223: 157: 1930: 726:

and putting various redirects in place during the period of transition from

445: 387: 380: 267: 1700: 1484: 1471: 1372: 1103: 1069: 1499:

User:BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

290:

I'd say go for it, neat little bot offering helpful functionality. --

1760:

This is not a traditional bot; it does not edit any pages. Also,

1414:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard#Curps.27_block_bot

25: 1988:

What about checking against the admin list? Or bot list? --

500:, run it for one week, then you may apply for bot status. -- 1188:) for this and now I would like your permission to use it. 1387:

necessary to run it immediately, and I posted a notice at

219: 1363:

Curps is running an blocking bot which he refuses to get

855:) has been created to handle major tasks. The 'bot flag 1703:

has already described how this 'bot has already made a

1401: 884: 439: 369:. I'm sure you could adapt it to other uses, though. -- 334:

Technically, you could call Perl from command line. --

1389:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

747:

Knowledge (XXG):non-main namespace pages for deletion

724:

Knowledge (XXG):non-main namespace pages for deletion

1295:"placing intimidatingly nuclear missiles in Cuba" -- 1583:

User:Willy willy willy willy... Mushroom, Mushroom!

871:

Permitted to apply bot flag, one week from 8/28. --

722:VFDBOT has now been renamed DELBOT, and is dealing 656:it adds a lot of wiki syntax to pages. In general, 930:That is good news! Thanks for the explanation. -- 645:Personally I don't think its an advantage to have 1149:Approved after speaking with author on IRC. -- 1407:for August 26 to see what happened on that day. 965:Ideas? Suggestions? Thoughts? Threats? :p -- 1305:Someone’s been boasting about their vandalbot. 701:seems to be overkill, so no flag is required. 1343:automated spellchecking is bad, since that's 8: 660:should never be replaced with their target. 1625:User:May the Willy on Wheels be with you! 953:I'm writing a bot which I plan to run as 861:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Votes for deletion 193:User interface helper under development 1748:Knowledge (XXG):List of administrators 1717:Portal namespace initialisation script 444:I did a (naughty) single-page test on 406:(edited at 23:27, 22 July 2005 (UTC)) 275:The source is available for review at 258:to update the vulnerability counts in 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1137:Is this manually assisted or what? -- 765:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 732:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 410:Approved for test run of one week. -- 7: 1656:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1641:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1627:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1613:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1599:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1585:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1571:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1557:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1543:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1529:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1515:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1501:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1487:" with an expiry time of indefinite 1367:approval for. Further discussion is 1241:I have created a different account, 895:The 'bot doesn't edit articles. It 1639:User:My willy is bigger than yours! 1247:to address both of these concerns. 903:. An edit+rename would show up as 354:Comparison of web browsers#Security 120:special:contributions/Brendan OShea 1412:As fvw suggests, discussion is at 749:, as I am now making certain that 728:Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion 24: 109:running unauthorised spelling bot 152:I have offered them to set up a 29: 1825: 1822: 1816: 1611:User:Microsoft Willy on Wheels! 1382:08:23, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 835: 367:Comparison of operating systems 260:Comparison of operating systems 1936:15:27, 2005 September 3 (UTC) 1920:14:30, September 2, 2005 (UTC) 1709:User:Uncle G's major work 'bot 1693:User:Uncle G's major work 'bot 1080:12:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 935:20:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 926:12:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 916:23:30, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 891:22:52, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 837:User:Uncle G's major work 'bot 664:isn't one though. -- User:Docu 180:Wikipedia_talk:Bots#SEWilcoBot 1: 2052:04:36, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 2039:06:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 2014:07:24, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 1996:04:08, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 1976:07:24, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 1959:07:22, 7 September 2005 (UTC) 1946:06:30, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 1893:06:30, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 1871:06:03, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 1854:04:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 1843:03:16, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 1830:13:32, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1811: 1786:10:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1774:10:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1672:09:10, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1555:User:Spongewilly Squarewheels 1449:09:35, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1426:09:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1169:04:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 879:06:37, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 826:06:40, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 775:06:39, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 433:Harley-Davidson Motor Company 1697:principle of least privilege 745:Please restrict your bot to 658:Redirects with possibilities 254:I request permission to run 156:project on their user talk. 1913: 1679:10:18:39, 2005-09-01 (UTC)) 1439:09:54:22, 2005-09-01 (UTC) 1336:20:16, 27 August 2005 (UTC) 1327:23:12, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 1315:16:04, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 1300:07:59, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 1272:11:07, 27 August 2005 (UTC) 1252:01:30, 26 August 2005 (UTC) 1237:23:15, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 1224:01:15, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 1206:17:34, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 1193:17:32, 20 August 2005 (UTC) 1157:01:26, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 1145:21:24, 19 August 2005 (UTC) 1132:02:09, 17 August 2005 (UTC) 1111:22:38, 10 August 2005 (UTC) 1059:04:28, 20 August 2005 (UTC) 867:18:48:45, 2005-08-28 (UTC) 815:00:43:01, 2005-08-20 (UTC) 800:02:01:58, 2005-08-06 (UTC) 705:02:01:58, 2005-08-06 (UTC) 684:11:22:55, 2005-08-05 (UTC) 508:04:30, 20 August 2005 (UTC) 286:14:54, July 19, 2005 (UTC) 250:Permission to run SecuniBot 236:fur further information. -- 2068: 1739:10:18:39, 2005-09-01 (UTC) 1541:User:Mr Treason On Wheels! 1358: 1351:02:43:09, 2005-08-28 (UTC) 1260:, and add your bot to the 1043:03:30, 8 August 2005 (UTC) 1023:23:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 1004:20:36, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 991:20:28, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 970:19:53, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 808:14:01:48, 2005-08-16 (UTC) 738:18:42:12, 2005-08-28 (UTC) 716:08:41, 6 August 2005 (UTC) 637:08:38, 6 August 2005 (UTC) 624:01:08, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 556:14:00, July 29, 2005 (UTC) 484:16:12, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 373:11:38, July 24, 2005 (UTC) 323:11:38, July 24, 2005 (UTC) 1695:) in accordance with the 1513:User:MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 843:Uncle G's major work 'bot 589:08:10, 30 July 2005 (UTC) 569:03:42, 30 July 2005 (UTC) 546:05:06, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 533:23:32, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 471:05:04, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 458:21:07, 21 July 2005 (UTC) 418:05:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 404:02:37, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 361:06:42, 24 July 2005 (UTC) 342:05:01, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 307:05:11, 24 July 2005 (UTC) 295:11:09, 23 July 2005 (UTC) 241:20:51, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 227:22:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC) 208:WP:Inherent bot drawbacks 187:07:47, 10 July 2005 (UTC) 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots 2027:NekoDaemon modifications 1807:Knowledge (XXG):Signpost 1569:User:GAYNIGGER ON WHEELS 1479:07:14, 1 September 2005 1466:07:16, 1 September 2005 1456:07:18, 1 September 2005 1123:I would like to run bot 451:Comments or Objections? 160:July 3, 2005 11:50 (UTC) 149:2 July 2005 23:48 (UTC) 130:2 July 2005 18:26 (UTC) 1597:User:George Willys Bush 1093:on personal request of 479:How about HarleyBot? -- 174:Bot flag requested for 170:SEWilcoBot flag request 138:2 July 2005 22:11 (UTC) 117:User talk:Brendan OShea 1648:10:51, 26 August 2005 1633:13:00, 26 August 2005 1619:13:10, 26 August 2005 1605:13:26, 26 August 2005 1591:13:41, 26 August 2005 1577:14:17, 26 August 2005 1563:15:13, 26 August 2005 1549:15:20, 26 August 2005 1535:15:29, 26 August 2005 1521:19:02, 29 August 2005 1507:19:10, 29 August 2005 1493:14:14, 31 August 2005 1460:unblocked User:#35795 1033:#en.wikipedia.copyvios 1527:User:BOING OING OING! 1285:Why spellbots are bad 699:Special:Recentchanges 277:User:SecuniBot/source 42:of past discussions. 1762:Knowledge (XXG):Bots 1365:Knowledge (XXG):Bots 1258:Knowledge (XXG):Bots 959:{{copyvio|url=blah}} 899:renames them, using 763:) is taking care of 673: 1689:User:Uncle G's 'bot 1661:(traditional block) 1431:Discussion belongs 790:User:Uncle G's 'bot 695:User:Uncle G's 'bot 675:User:Uncle G's 'bot 424:Harley-Davidson bot 222:. Your thoughts? -- 1654:User:Dieseldrinker 1403:), and please see 1359:Curps' autoblocker 1347:what it is doing. 114:User:Brendan OShea 107:User:Brendan OShea 2044:Code complete. -- 1680: 1400:(permanent link: 1380: 1089:I have unblocked 1077: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2059: 1919: 1827: 1823: 1820: 1815: 1715:to know whether 1674: 1435:, on this page. 1405:Special:Log/move 1379: 1376: 1213:User:DisambigBot 1186:User:AgentsooBot 1076: 1073: 901:Special:Movepage 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2029: 1377: 1361: 1287: 1216: 1182: 1121: 1087: 1074: 951: 840: 785: 690: 678: 606: 525: 426: 384: 252: 195: 178:. Details at: 172: 111: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2065: 2063: 2055: 2054: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1949: 1948: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1857: 1856: 1789: 1788: 1777: 1776: 1766: 1765: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1742: 1741: 1705:false positive 1681: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1645: 1631: 1617: 1603: 1589: 1575: 1561: 1547: 1533: 1519: 1505: 1491: 1477: 1475:(ooops, sorry) 1464: 1451: 1429: 1428: 1418: 1417: 1409: 1408: 1393: 1392: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1353: 1352: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1317: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1215: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1147: 1125:User:Andrewbot 1120: 1117: 1115: 1086: 1083: 1068:by the way. -- 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1036: 1026: 1025: 1008: 1007: 1006: 994: 993: 960: 950: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 918: 839: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 809: 784: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 740: 739: 720: 719: 718: 689: 686: 682:Uncle G's 'bot 677: 672: 670: 668: 667: 666: 665: 662:Captain Panaka 654: 653: 652: 649: 640: 639: 605: 600: 598: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 574: 573: 572: 571: 558: 557: 549: 548: 530:GrammarGremlin 524: 522:GrammarGremlin 519: 517: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 498:User:HarleyBot 489: 488: 487: 486: 474: 473: 425: 422: 421: 420: 383: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 327: 326: 325: 324: 316: 310: 309: 298: 297: 256:User:SecuniBot 251: 248: 246: 244: 243: 194: 191: 171: 168: 167: 166: 163: 162: 161: 139: 110: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2064: 2053: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2037: 2034: 2026: 2024: 2015: 2012: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1997: 1994: 1991: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1977: 1974: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1960: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1944: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1935: 1932: 1918: 1916: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1894: 1891: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1852: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1841: 1838: 1832: 1831: 1828: 1821: 1819: 1814: 1808: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1787: 1784: 1779: 1778: 1775: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1738: 1732: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1673: 1670: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1646: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1452: 1450: 1447: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1438: 1434: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1381: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1356: 1350: 1346: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1310: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1298: 1292: 1284: 1282: 1273: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1262:Category:Bots 1259: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1214: 1211: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1179: 1177: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1126: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1084: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1071: 1067: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1005: 1002: 998: 997: 996: 995: 992: 988: 984: 980: 979: 974: 973: 972: 971: 968: 963: 958: 956: 949: 946: 936: 933: 929: 928: 927: 924: 919: 917: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 893: 892: 889: 885: 882: 881: 880: 877: 874: 870: 869: 868: 866: 862: 858: 854: 851: 848: 844: 838: 827: 824: 821: 817: 816: 814: 810: 807: 802: 801: 799: 795: 791: 787: 786: 782: 776: 773: 770: 766: 762: 759: 756: 752: 748: 744: 743: 742: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 714: 711: 707: 706: 704: 700: 696: 692: 691: 687: 685: 683: 676: 671: 663: 659: 655: 650: 647: 646: 644: 643: 642: 641: 638: 635: 632: 628: 627: 626: 625: 621: 617: 613: 612: 604: 601: 599: 590: 587: 584: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 570: 567: 564:as sentences. 562: 561: 560: 559: 555: 551: 550: 547: 544: 541: 537: 536: 535: 534: 531: 523: 520: 518: 509: 506: 503: 499: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 485: 482: 478: 477: 476: 475: 472: 469: 466: 462: 461: 460: 459: 456: 452: 449: 447: 442: 440: 436: 434: 429: 423: 419: 416: 413: 409: 408: 407: 405: 402: 399: 398: 397: 393: 389: 382: 379: 372: 368: 364: 363: 362: 359: 355: 351: 350: 343: 340: 337: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 322: 317: 314: 313: 312: 311: 308: 305: 300: 299: 296: 293: 289: 288: 287: 285: 280: 278: 273: 270: 268: 263: 261: 257: 249: 247: 242: 239: 235: 231: 230: 229: 228: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 192: 190: 188: 185: 181: 177: 169: 164: 159: 155: 154:User:Humanbot 151: 150: 148: 144: 143:User:Humanbot 140: 137: 133: 132: 131: 129: 125: 121: 118: 115: 108: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2030: 2022: 1927: 1917: 1833: 1817: 1812: 1803: 1799: 1793: 1790: 1734: 1723: 1713:Tim Starling 1657: 1647: 1642: 1628: 1614: 1600: 1586: 1572: 1558: 1544: 1530: 1516: 1502: 1488: 1474: 1461: 1432: 1430: 1362: 1354: 1344: 1288: 1280: 1242: 1217: 1183: 1175: 1122: 1114: 1088: 1062: 1049: 1015: 976: 964: 952: 908: 904: 896: 856: 849: 841: 794:User:Sandbot 757: 679: 669: 651:instead of ] 609: 607: 597: 526: 516: 453: 450: 443: 437: 430: 427: 395: 390: 385: 281: 274: 271: 264: 253: 245: 203: 199: 196: 173: 112: 78: 43: 37: 1244:DisambigBot 1180:AgentsooBot 1095:User:Flacus 1091:User:FlaBot 371:K. Sperling 321:K. Sperling 284:K. Sperling 36:This is an 1658:(pagemove) 1643:(pagemove) 1629:(pagemove) 1615:(pagemove) 1601:(pagemove) 1587:(pagemove) 1573:(pagemove) 1559:(pagemove) 1545:(pagemove) 1531:(pagemove) 1517:(pagemove) 1503:(pagemove) 1489:(pagemove) 1470:unblocked 1249:Rob Church 1221:Rob Church 1129:Andrew pmk 603:User:N-Bot 176:SEWilcoBot 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 11 85:Archive 10 2046:AllyUnion 2033:AllyUnion 1990:AllyUnion 1865:AllyUnion 1794:continued 1685:Netoholic 1669:Everyking 1652:blocked " 1637:blocked " 1623:blocked " 1609:blocked " 1595:blocked " 1581:blocked " 1567:blocked " 1553:blocked " 1539:blocked " 1525:blocked " 1511:blocked " 1497:blocked " 1483:blocked " 1321:AllyUnion 1309:Susvolans 1266:AllyUnion 1231:AllyUnion 1200:AllyUnion 1163:AllyUnion 1139:AllyUnion 1119:Andrewbot 1099:AllyUnion 1053:AllyUnion 955:User:Cobo 948:User:Cobo 873:AllyUnion 820:AllyUnion 769:AllyUnion 710:AllyUnion 631:AllyUnion 583:AllyUnion 540:AllyUnion 502:AllyUnion 465:AllyUnion 446:Gay Byrne 412:AllyUnion 336:AllyUnion 182:above. ( 79:Archive 9 73:Archive 8 68:Archive 7 60:Archive 5 1956:Carnildo 1915:Phroziac 1727:contribs 1485:User:Fvw 1472:User:Fvw 1444:day. -- 1297:Carnildo 1040:Veratien 1013:Phroziac 1001:Veratien 967:Veratien 853:contribs 761:contribs 566:Tubelius 496:Sign up 304:Carnildo 234:bot page 220:PHP/cURL 212:Humanbot 136:Plugwash 1737:Uncle G 1677:Uncle G 1437:Uncle G 1349:Uncle G 923:Uncle G 913:Uncle G 865:Uncle G 813:Uncle G 806:Uncle G 798:Uncle G 783:SANDBOT 751:AFD Bot 736:Uncle G 703:Uncle G 481:boinger 455:boinger 292:Yogi de 216:Sandbox 184:SEWilco 39:archive 2049:(talk) 2036:(talk) 1993:(talk) 1868:(talk) 1840:(talk) 1462:(oops) 1324:(talk) 1269:(talk) 1234:(talk) 1203:(talk) 1166:(talk) 1142:(talk) 1085:FlaBot 1056:(talk) 876:(talk) 823:(talk) 772:(talk) 713:(talk) 688:DELBOT 634:(talk) 586:(talk) 543:(talk) 505:(talk) 468:(talk) 415:(talk) 358:Ptomes 339:(talk) 2011:Curps 1973:Curps 1943:Curps 1890:Curps 1851:Curps 1837:Norvy 1818:Verse 1813:Blank 1783:Curps 1771:Curps 1731:Curps 1650:Curps 1635:Curps 1621:Curps 1607:Curps 1593:Curps 1579:Curps 1565:Curps 1551:Curps 1537:Curps 1523:Curps 1509:Curps 1495:Curps 1481:Curps 1468:Curps 1458:Curps 1446:Curps 1423:Curps 1333:Curps 1066:WP:CV 932:Tabor 888:Tabor 554:r3m0t 238:IByte 224:IByte 158:r3m0t 16:< 1931:grin 1721:talk 1691:and 1433:here 1398:AN/I 1396:See 1371:. -- 1369:here 1289:See 1154:aran 1108:Talk 1018:talk 897:only 857:will 847:talk 767:. -- 755:talk 381:ABot 147:Deco 124:Dunc 1769:-- 1707:. 1701:fvw 1421:-- 1373:fvw 1345:not 1190:Soo 1151:Pak 1104:JRM 1070:fvw 909:and 905:two 730:to 435:". 204:not 200:not 1912:-- 1809:. 1264:-- 1106:· 1097:. 989:) 886:-- 863:. 734:. 622:) 388:AB 302:-- 282:-- 279:. 262:. 189:) 145:. 94:→ 64:← 1934:✎ 1826:∅ 1724:· 1719:( 1416:. 1391:. 1378:* 1312:⇔ 1075:* 1020:) 1016:( 987:c 985:/ 983:t 981:( 978:N 850:· 845:( 758:· 753:( 648:] 620:c 618:/ 616:t 614:( 611:N 401:✉ 396:D 392:C 128:☺ 126:| 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:Bots/Archive 9 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index