Knowledge (XXG)

talk:Bots/Archive 18 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source šŸ“

1739:, especially sections 38, 41, and 43, though there may well be additional notes on this page from dissatisfied users.) I wonder if someone could block its actions and suggest that it is changed to merely put a note on people's user pages asking them to manually edit the pages, as this seems to be the simplest option. I have had to revert my page, and have yet to work out what I must do to successfully achieve what the bot was trying to do. Thank you. 3897: 4140:. The idea is that it can be placed on a page to discourage bots, much in the same way that robots.txt works. Whether it is honoured will depend on the bot, the name space and potentially arguments. E.g {{nobots|except=WerdnaBot}} might be used on a user talk to allow only WerdnaBot to edit it, but AntiVandalBot might still decide to override. Possibly {{nobots|theseones=SmackBot,Rambot}} would allow any bots execpt SB and RB. Comments? 31: 2106:
then so that RC patrol can verify that it isn't a vandal or a malfunctioning approved bot. The speed of additions is irrelavent. Of course on a practical note, an anonymous bot has no bot flag, so it will uncessarily clutter the RC. All this is previous precedent to support blocking. But you are correct: It is good that it seems to have a slow pace. ā€”
1619:
see a single old request pop back up. If a large number of them pop back up, my first question is going to be "Where have you been for the past three months, and will you be dropping out again, leaving questions about your bot unanswered for three months or longer?" Until a problem surfaces from it, I say it was a good solution.
3657:- the problem is that active discussion edits are not shown in the edit history (it uses tranclusion apparently). Bot operator martin is clearly aware what the problem is but will not change it's operation without some clear mandate. Perhaps some sensible person could give him a push in the right direction. Thank you. 3917:
or similar (the name probably stinks, i know). It could outline the various languages available, outline issues that everyone writing a bot is going to bump into and need to know about (edit tokens etc), have links to set code snippets for certain tasks etc, as well as being the obvious place for bot
2698:
I agree with this and there is nothing controversial here. I would say though that in some cases it may make sense to get a bot flag if there are a large enough number of edits that are not one-time-only. It isn't clear from the above when such a bot should go through the process. Perhaps "when in
2105:
It's possible that it is some bot that periodically loses its "logged in" status, but it is vital to be able to monitor the bot, so it can't be run anonymously. The rambot has accidentally run as an IP before, although that was back when most people knew what it was. But it should have been blocked
1774:
Thanks for the response and the actions. I noticed that complaints are still being made by people on the talk page of the bot, and looking back over the previous messages, it seems that similar problems were being complained about since May of this year at least. It appears that nothing has been done
1618:
The vast majority of the 90+ requests that I archived had not been commented on in months. Months. I don't see a problem, in the least, with removing requests that are doing nothing but taking up space and making the page unmanageable. The archiving has been done for several days now, and I've yet to
1433:
I want to make a lot of AWB spellchecking edits, and so as not to crowd my contrib list and make more than the 1-2 edits per minute, I want to make a bot account. As always it will be human-assisted, and I'll monitor each and every change (AWB shows me the diff preview) but since I'll be making a lot
3535:
The problem is that I was told this was the best way to proceed (by someone who seems to have done it themself) and having checked the Python documenation to ensure it was callable from C++ I've now got rather a lot of time invested in C++ robot code which I'd really rather not just scrap. Given the
3253:
It appears the "api" is only for reading information at the moment, it seems to make actual edits you still have to use the interface designed for web browsers, that means you need to read up on enough html to find and parse a form and enough http to post the results of editing that form back to the
3202:
I've spent hours scraping around and I can't find the API? Where is the documentation that says "This is what you need to send" and "This is what you get back". I don't want wrappers or dll's or libraries, I just want to know what strings of bytes I need to send, where to send them and the format of
4511:
I'm a bit confused. I thought you were just doing this in AWB. The trouble with what I'm seeing above is that it requires the bot to know to replace a shortened station name with a longer station name. That's basically manual work, unless I'm reading this wrong. Could you clarify what you're trying
3507:
Well I've developed several thousand lines of robot software and I'd like to save a few days (weeks) trying to work out the http input required by the servers as, of course, this isn't documented anywhere. I've been told that it can be used from other languages and the Python documentation supports
2978:
There's a simple solution to that - any quotation that includes a misspelling or grammatical error should include after the error. This is something editors should be doing independent of any consideration of spell-checking bots. I was interested in creating a bot much like HighInBC's suggestion,
1969:
Ganeshk's problem appears to have been resolved by Betacommand. It had to do with a redlinked category added to an article, and deciding which extant category a nonexistant category might have been a subcat of is usually beyond bots. I tried to solve the other thing (about the removing cabinet of
1201:
That other bots have been reverting some of its edits as vandalism, while marginally amusing, is telling. If it's too time-consuming for one person to manually oversee the activity of this 'bot, given the number of pages it's attacking, then the task needs to be split between multiple people - not
4309:
I'm not in a hurry to let this code start editing yet, but I was wondering what my next steps should be once I get to that point. Should I seek approval for the account for general framework testing using user subpages, or will I need to specify an actual task (probably also using user subpages)?
2920:
I noticed that it is stated that no spellchecking bot could ever function without assitence. Now I understand the fundemental faults with spell checkers, lord know I have tried to depend on them in the past due to my deplorable spelliong. But it does not seem accurate to say it is not technically
2791:
message after those posts when I have encountered them. However, this could be a job for a bot: scan the Recent changes list limited to the Talk space, and if a comment is made by an IP-address, check it for a signature and add one if necessary. Of course logged in users also forget the signature
1600:
This seems to imply that quite a number of recently-archived discussion with no approval, disapproval, or pending questions from the AG will presently be getting unarchived and having "uh, hello" suffixed to them, somewhat defeating the point of archiving them in the first place. This might more
1418:
Point number 5 and 6 below "When naming your bot" seem to not really belong to that section. The information they contain seems unrelated to naming ones bot and seems to be nothing one would expect under this headline. Also, if there exists something laid out as a policy in its own right on these
2423:
items that while on their face may seem "common" may in fact be apropos to the article. Also, in general I prefer to see and abundance of linking, makes for richer exploration. I have seen some errors where it has removed the link around a year but truncated the value (1993 became 993). The bot
1195:
is problematic. It's attempting to do unattended something which really should not be being done without manual supervision - namely accusing (or stopping just short of accusing) large numbers of users of plagarism. That it looks neither at the image itself nor at the description (except for the
3517:
Your best bet is to just code up what you want as another bot using the pyWikipediaBot framework in Python. There's also a Perl bot framework out there if you're interested, though it's not as fully-featured. Other than that, I wouldn't really recommend trying to use the frameworks from other
1830:
of Cydebot. The bot's action basically made the articles orphans (without categories). Without the categories, there is no way to get to these articles. This is like destroying constructive work of others and make the encyclopidia building process difficult. The bad part is that the bot did not
696:
with over 97.5% confidence. Some of the times it was reverts to vandalized versions, others reverting someone uncensoring song names or something, sometimes reverting someone that claimed to be the subject trying to 'delete' the article when it probably should have been deleted (in one case it
2308:
Is it possible that we could get some useful categorisation of the bots? I'd be interested in seeing them categorised by programming language (so people can find similar examples) and open sourceness (likewise looking for code to use), and also if there's some way to categorise their general
1567:
I have no problems with the first four; the archives should be, well, archived, and so should anything more than a month old. If the bot operator can't be bothered to come back and say "Uh, hello?" they're probably not that dedicated to having their bot, and we need people who are going to be
2393:
I propose that we add a statement to this policy that all bot edits (and edits made with any software assistance) must abide by all existing guidelines and common practices. The reason is that I occasionally notice bots/javascript etc. edits that change articles in a manner - that while not
4462:}} to replace it. If {{NYCS time}} is followed by it, such as {{NYCS 7}} followed by {{NYCS time|1234}}, then I want {{NYCS service|7||1234}} to replace it. If {{NYCS time}} is followed by a rush template, such as {{NYCS 7 rush}} {{NYCS time|1a2a3c}} then I want {{NYCS service|7|<7: --> 2792:
sometimes, and those could be checked too, if it doesn't take too much resources. Alternatively only check those users that have not created an user page yet, they are often new to Knowledge (XXG) and do not know about signing their posts. Is anyone with the skill/equipment up to this? --
1060:
Thanks for the info. This is definetly a good start. Unfortunately the toolserver seems to analyze all namespaces save the Knowledge (XXG) namespace (and as far as I can tell the toolserver doesn't display results for anything other then articles). Where should I request expantion of
353:
It's obviously using the interwiki module from pywikipedia. It's not that uncommon for interwiki links to be added anonymously, a lot of users don't bother creating accounts in other languages. The only way this could be a big deal is if the links were incorrect. Ideally, we'd have
2877:
I thought about this before, and I realized it would be very hard to make it accurate. For example what about when someone adds a new paragraph to a message they already wrote, or altered a peice of common text on a talk page. I could not think of a way to avoid false positives.
4021:
page that you mention. I feel this would give a much more comprehensive overview of bots from all angles and would be helpful no matter what reason you clicked on the "bot" link in all the bot templates. I will wait to get a few more comments before taking any action. Cheers -
1653:
please let me clarify i didnt want them it be unachived, just put on a seprate achive somthing like WP:BOT/no consensus. as for the other approvals i suggest something like WP:BOT/Approved & WP:BOT/denined or something like that so it would be easier to find a bots status.
178:
The Communications committee is working on coordinating the use of sitewide notices for Wikimedia projects. This is needed for the upcoming fundraiser, as well as other potential announcements relevant to all projects, such as Wikimania or technical issues like single login.
3433:
I've been trying to find out how to use it but either no one knows, or they're not letting on. 'Someone' must know how to use it from other languages. It claims on the framework page 'we will welcome you'. Quite frankly it's about as welcoming as a rabid dobermanĀ :-)
825:
This bot would be human assisted. Basically, I think I would feed it a list of pages and it would make sure they all had the proper headings. Although there are quite a few archival pages, I don't think this would be a server hog, as it could be run at set intervals.
468:
I've noticed some editors and their accounts and bots have been doing away with good edits, improvements of the page. What they are doing is not harmless to the encyclopedia. They seem to be trying to keep what they wrote as the top page, thus preventing any possible
1136:
Please delete this account, the bot spams user pages, doesn't identify correctly tagged images (apparently looking at templates instead of categories), and it doesn't wait to let users fix their errors. The owner is unresponsive to complaints on the bot's talk page.
1666:
To give due credit, E. seems to have sped things up enormously, so I'll file the above under the general heading of "startup costs" of new system, and "all's well that ends well". I just rather had visions of endless "churning" of requests without resolution...
2189:
Regarding my comment on speed, this "bot" is making less than 1 edit per day, that's hardly enough to need to go through the bot process, in fact if they would have not put the word "robot" in their edit summary, would we even be having this disucussion? ā€”
4074:
If you are new to bots or new to programming generally, you're going to find it a steep learning curve to write a genuinely useful new wikipedia bot. If you have programming knowledge, then go for it. If nt, you might be best either running a clone of an
4331:
You can and should request approval for the bot to perform the specific task of testing a bot. That's fine. Plus, you may get java bot programmers (such as myself) to help out. If you don't seek approval, some admins would block the bot on sight. --
709:
I'd be interested in specific examples as well. Bots are not intended to prevent forward progress in articles, but rather to thwart silly vandalism. When examples are brought forward, the bot authors make their bots better. That seems goodness to me.
3918:
developers to post quesries (on the accompanying talk page) relating to bot development - currently such questions would be scattered between this page (which is really about bot policy and the bot requests page (which again, isn't really suitable).
3763:
As someone who was a short while ago looking to start out on the path to setting up a bot on wikipedia, it struck me that the pages on bots (below) contained no help information on getting started with your bot, but rather focused solely on policy.
3465:
Yes, but as the poster says, it's 'partial'. And that is something of an understatement. I had a look at the sourceforge page but trying to go to the documentation just took me around in circles. I'll try and post to the mailing list but it seems a
2005:
Please, go ahead. I won't do anything but uncontroversial standard CFD work until I talk to Tawker at least (in case this is about something else). I must admit, his block reason didn't exactly give me any information about what was going onĀ :-(
3549:
the basic idea is simple, request the edit page, parse the html to find the form, change the stuff you need to change and then submit the result over http, your http implementation will also need to be able to handle cookies so that it can log in.
1364:
I am writing a bot to run on Hindi Knowledge (XXG). I am using python wikimedia framework. I am getting an error, "UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xff in position 0: unexpected code byte" when executing the following code,
2169:
I've unblocked the IP, since it is an approved bot, albiet occasionally getting logged out. Looking at the recent archives, this problem has occurred before without any apparent resolve, so we may want to consider a more permanent solution.
1970:
norway's cat) and I cannot figure out what happened unless it was something similar (cab of norway was redlinked when cydebot was given the task and had since been created and populated). Cab of norway was only created September 6th or so.
1236:
group of pages, and is failing there. It has partially failed in archiving the /Science page for several months, and just in the last day or two looks like it may be failing to archive for the whole group. So I suppose one thing needed is
829:
Would a bot like this be approved? I could write a basic javascript for my monobook.js that would let me basically do the exact same thing, but I'd have to sit there and click through the pages instead of letting the bot click them for me.
182:
It's anticipated that we will use a bot to help update these messages, which due to the nature of the pages being edited will need to have universal sysop privileges. Rest assured that we won't be using it for other sysop functions.
1196:
template) is a severe technical limitation, most likely not fully resolvable. For this reason, it should not be running unattended for pretty much the same reasons that we traditionally have opposed running spellcheckers unattended.
1831:
inform any one about this. I had to find this on my watchlist. I am not for this bot empyting out categories. Can someone please stop this bot from doing this? Can someone put this job, "Emptying out deleted category" to a vote? -
4037:
and linked to it fromt he botnav template. I would appreciate any help others could give in expanding it, its very new and stub-by at the minute and really needs some good work on it to make it useful. I will leave moving Bot -:
817:
Hi all. I am thinking about setting up a bot to work on archived pages. Not a bot to do the actual archival of the pages themselves, but one for archival maintenance, such as adding archive header templates (for example, see
2254:...I know this may sound kind of stupid, but I always wonder what the red button on the bot page is for, it says it'll block the bot, but mabye... will it block the person who presses it? (please respond on my talk page.) 4083:. You can write a wikipedia bot in almost any programming language. If you do start from scratch, you are unlikely to be running a bot from the dedicated wikipedia toolserver at first. You will therefore have to either: 2313:
I guess it might be useful to have different categories for Pywiki or AWB bots etc. though AWB is generally not used as a bot specifically, so it might get a bit confusing. Categorisation by task could be pretty useful.
1713:
Well, or access to webserver running a compiler. Programming languages like Perl are compiled at run-time so you don't need a compiler on your own machine, just notepad, and the webserver compiles the code for you -
1229:) hasn't edited for several months. It continues plodding on its way, doing useful things it appears, and hasn't particularly misbehaved AFAIK. However, without a master it can't be adapted to changing situations. 2939:
What needs to be done for such an automated bot(which I for one am not skilled enough to create) is to provide a list of words and their mispellings where there is no possible alternate meaning to the word. Such as
559: 4222:
Well, really late to the game, I don't think it would be the best idea in the world for AVB. Our nice friendly vandal could post the no-bots tag and voila, AVB wouldn't revert - which would be a bad thing....--
1802:. Can something not be done to fix this once and for all? Is this the correct place to draw someone's attention to it who can act to fix the problem, since Cyde seems not to respond to any calls to fix his bot? 3272:
Yeah, nobody said it was pretty ... although there is now a query.php, which offers more direct access to the anti-vandalism bots than having to just use the standard web interface that all of the humans do.
2678:
Assisted bots don't necessarily need bot approval, though some software has built in approval detection, whereby approval from an admin is required (developers are encouraged to build in approval mechanisms).
4460:
I originally requested approval for my bot to replace templates such as {{NYCS 7}} with {{NYCS service|7}}. If the template is a rush template, such as {{NYCS 7 rush}}, then I want {{NYCS service|7|<7:
1202:
blindly left under control of an unattended automated process which neither understands plaintext in the image descriptions nor is able to make any determination of content by viewing the image itself. --
1268:
Cryptic just showed up to reply to a "your bot is broken" message. I left him a message that if he is going to "stay with the project" at least as a bot operator, that I will unblock the bot account. ā€”
1518:. during this process I noticed that the procedure for getting the preamble for running a bot can a extreamly difficult and time consuming process. I would like to make a suggestion. Split the page 2979:
although the use of "predominately" (which is not a word, but a common misspelling of "predominantly") was my target. If Carnildo's objection is the only one, I don't see it as a real problem. |
1448:
Just create a second account and make it a AWB account no need to get a Bot status it is still just you behind the controls it doesnt matter about getting it approved. Just be careful it meets
4283:
for as much as possible and fills in the gaps with legacy methods like XHTML parsing until the API supports the added functionality. I am planning for it to have functionality comparable to
155: 3913:, sicne that is overwhelmingly what it covers. This is important, but when people are looking to set up a bot it seems to me we shuold be able to give them a page within the botnav tree of 3236:
Something along the lines of {Open port 80 and send "title=Wikipedia_talk:Bots&action=edit&section=21&data=the new data"}, the returned data will be {format of returned data}.
358:, but then, in a perfect world, the interwiki links would be automatically generated by the software as well. In the meantime, let's not block people who creating any actual disruption. ā€” 1775:
with respect to those previous requests, and so I wonder whether this bot could simply be blocked unless or until its owner replies speedily and change its behaviour almost immediately.
1434:
of edits, a bot account makes sense. Is this the place to apply for approval for such a venture, or is there some policy that easily defines what I should and shouldn't do with AWB? --
4064:
by converting entries without the last name first structure to take on that structure. Is that something that a bot could do? Is that likely a bit much for a first time bot maker?
982:(myself included) who are interested in studying Knowledge (XXG). I'd very much like to see and use a tool that would look at the history of any article (including a talk page!) and: 4360:
Also, the question wasn't so much whether I should seek approval, but whether it was appropriate to ask for approval for something as general as "testing". Thanks for your response.
2454:
Are they required to have a bot flag to make multiple edits per minute? And it is debatable whether "Overlinking" applies in a blank sense to all links that they have on their list.
641: 1036: 600: 2834:
Tricky for sure, but it might be able to be pulled off. I would expect it to go through a number of iterations correcting for mistakes before it was fully successful though. --
884:
interface through which they can assign a certain user (the bot's account for example) to a special user group named "bot" and that's it - the user's edits no longer show up in
667: 161: 3356:
OK. I was dealing with a vandal, as was another user, and the bot reverted an edit and provided the vandal with a generic warning.(given test1, then test2, then generic)
308:
All done, except for a few random ones, I think my bot ignored them because the image was is transcluded from a template or something. (p.s. I just added functionality to
4442:, etc). Just leaving a note here so that bot people can keep an eye on this. Barberio, who notified about it on WP:VPP, said he was trying to contact the bot operator. -- 4387: 3842: 2342:
How does a Wiki Bot communicate with English Knowledge (XXG)? Does it request pages like any browser with HTTP, or does it use another protocol? Thanks in advance. -
694: 3932:
for bot developers similar to the helpful "here's how you get started" page for human editors. Anyone else feel the same way? Is there any backing for this idea?
2893:
to that page by that user, that would surely rule out most false positives. In any case, I think there is a bot that does something similar already. It is called
2323:
I second this - it would be really useful to see eg all Perl bots so that bot developers using common languages could cooperate/query one another directly etc. -
1023:
Even one or a few of those if implemented would be much, much appreciated! If we already have tools that can answer some of these questions, please let me know.--
2725:
My idea: Create a bot that checks the new changes and finds those with multiple exclamation marks (!!!!!!!!!11). 50% of all the vandalism I've seen has that. --
1681:
I'd love to learn a programming language and run a bot... but I don't want to download programming software. Is there an alternative to downloading software? --
3422: 3310:
Wiktionary is a separate community from Knowledge (XXG). Like all sister projects, it has its own request pages. Bot votes on Wiktionary can be started from
979: 414:
fair use images for deletion, even though I explained to its owner (who I want absolutely nothing to do with - this complicates things) that the IDF states:
2394:
necessarily wrong - is not consistent with the normal wiki-style. Normally this is limited to minor formatting things, but it is still needlessly annoying.
1313:
Hi, I think the list of bots is becoming too big, and should not be maintained on this page. I propose we split it up and move the list to another page. --
207: 4060:
What language does one use to write bots. I am thinking about learning how to write a bot so I can write one for the purpose of trolling and cleaning up
2269: 1924: 1419:
subjects, there might be a good point in pointing to that policy, and doing that early on the project page instead of hiding it in the place it is now. --
434:
You really should talk to the bot owner, but it appears to have tagged them as they were fair use without a rationale, which is surely correct behaviour.
160:
has added anti-vandal rollback functions to the bot being run under his main account. As I see no evidence of this being documented or discussed, I have
2781:
I have noticed that perhaps six out of seven anonymous users who leave comments on talk pages do not sign their posts properly. I have usually added the
3473: 3387: 3263:
OK, thanks, that's easy. I thought that was deprecated though, as it's effectively the same thing as screenscraping as far as server load is concerned.
3608:.) Could an admin please talk to him about this? The changes made by the bot may be considered minor, but some users don't want their subpages changed 1798:, despite being blocked once, has now been unblocked and is still apparently doing things it is not supposed to do, judging by fresh comments made on 276: 3925: 3882: 2419:
Greetings; There is an apparent job or bot that is unlinking of ā€œcommon wordsā€ which seems to be running overboard in a number of instances; it is
3536:
fact that 'bots are quite slow moving it's even possible to communicate by reading and writing files on the disk - not very elegant, but possible.
2576:
The interwiki bots don't seem to mention rearrangements just additions modifications and removals, that edit it seems just involved rearangements.
1519: 421: 2762: 1347:
I moved the section, you are welcome to split it upĀ :) The page uses a number of sub-page templates, so don't forget to make proper redirects. --
4439: 3837: 2233:
and not the IP? Anyway, I donā€™t see a problem anymore; the link between bot and IP is made and a small note on the IP talk page is sufficient. --
4241: 2494:
On another wiki where I'm a sysop under a different username, I've got a bot that looks for spamming, then reverts it with the edit summary of
3806: 2047: 3498:
I would agree that user documentation of this framework is rather weak. IMHO, it's best used by developers, especially if they know Python.
3384:
I gather you can call the package to log in, read and write pages, but there is no documenation with the package and I can't find any here.
4438:
I couldn't find a task approval for this particular task (removing YuoTube links) for this bot, or for any other bot, in the usual places (
2539: 2157: 1996:. Looks like the objections were from well-intentioned editors who seem to expect omniscience. Any objections to me releasing the block? 1172: 2438: 493: 3399: 3061:
Looks like it's been very low volume, and not recent. If it starts going bezerk, it can be blocked, you can report it here, or even on
2606: 330:. While the edits appear to be benign, it was confusing to see a bot that is an IP. I would guess that it hasn't been approved, either. 4279:
I'm working on a new Java-based bot framework that I'm currently calling "jwikibot". The intention is to write a library that uses the
3667:
Just to say, the bot operator (martin, above) is me, and I'm only realy happy to make archival changes at the command of consensus at
3485: 3108: 327: 4500: 3875: 3870: 3742:
criterion #9). I've come upon fair use images on article talk pages, image pages and image talk pages (linking to other versions),
2948:, no possible error in mistaking it for another word. Not trying to change the world/wiki, just pointing out what I see, wheeeee. 1107: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 3508:
this view, but of course that means that you need the function names, call argument list and returns. Surely not too much to ask?
2675:
Typical assisted jobs include those which are repetitive, but need some human interaction e.g. Disambig repair, re-categorisation.
420:
Is there anyone who can help me to interact with the bot's owner; I wish to avoid any direct communication with him. See also: my
3921:
It could have FAQs on "how do I know if another bot alread does this", "how do I get my bot logged in to make edits" etc etc etc
3914: 3084: 3036: 2629: 2230: 750: 3799: 3650: 1246: 1242: 4393: 2129: 2203:
This bot has made over 200 edits in the last 24 hours, as of my posting this. They all seem to be interlanguage wikilinks. ā€”
4061: 1993: 242: 2958:
What would the bot do when it encountered a quotation from a book where the original author spelled it as "diferentiate"? --
2936:? To say it is not technically possible to create a spellchecking bot is just wrong. The scope simply needs to be limited. 2273: 2353: 837: 3815: 1100: 4299: 4111:
on an aside, i think this kind of post demonstrates the need for the "how do i get started" type page I propose above...
3726: 2143: 935: 866: 285: 251: 216: 4080: 4076: 4010: 3953: 3783: 2968:
Ohhhh, ya got me. I was wrong, the page is right. No automated system could account for that. I retract my contention.
2175: 4320:
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that I'm planning to open-source the code once it is more than just an ad hoc prototype.
3585: 3185: 3089: 3052:
Likely not logged in authorized but but we really have no clue short of checkusering the IP which is a privacy vio --
3041: 2758: 119: 4034: 4006: 3945: 1233: 756:. I fear he thinks that because I occasionally used the rollback button when he was being especially recalcitrant, I 3632:
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm... reminds me of someone... after all, WHO enjoyed remaking Episode IV with Nufy8 wiki-styleĀ ;)Ā ?
3449: 2404:
I am going to add this ammendment now, as I think it is uncontroversial, largely because it is simple commen sense.
1985: 4288: 1989: 846:
As long as its human assisted and it goes on pages people want edited I'd have no problems approving such a bot --
803: 38: 4018: 3957: 3887: 2475:
Obviously there are times when a link to "Saturday" is in context, it is up to the editor to make this judgement.
238: 4259: 4178: 4145: 3601: 3593: 2859: 2804: 2609:) is making useless edits. He has not stopped the bot, which I assume is because he is away from the computer. -- 2051: 1115: 1085: 731: 131: 4014: 3949: 3832: 3331: 3010: 2287: 1981: 970: 3680: 2533: 819: 149: 137: 1464:
has been created, and I have applied for its AWB approval (maybe I should have applied from that account?). --
877: 203: 3395: 3226:
No good, that is just gobbledegook to me since I don't know php. It also does not explain how to write pages.
2501: 4470:{{NYCS S Franklin}} replaced by {{NYCS service|S - Franklin Avenue Shuttle (New York City Subway service|S}} 4017:
etc. I also prpose expanding the "botnav" template embedded above to contain all these pages, including the
3654: 3481: 2600: 931: 862: 295: 272: 261: 226: 125: 4002: 3994: 3910: 3792: 3749:
It doesn't necessarily have to remove the images, it just needs to notify a human editor of the problem. --
4473:{{NYCS S Rockaway}} replaced by {{NYCS service|S - Rockaway Park Shuttle (New York City Subway service|S}} 3738:
I have an idea for a bot: one that checks if fair use images are being used outside of article namespace (
3112: 3079: 3031: 2754: 2688:
I don't think any of these points are new or remotely controversial, so I'll add them pretty soon. thanks
2055: 990: 605: 143: 4457: 3822: 3143: 2592: 2554: 1637: 1586: 416: 47: 17: 4496: 4443: 4361: 4346: 4321: 4311: 4245: 3865: 3658: 3560: 3391: 3340: 3327: 3301: 3264: 3237: 3204: 3152: 3027: 3006: 2455: 2161: 2147: 1695: 1420: 885: 717: 712: 411: 4306:, but I have been running the parsing code without logging in because it is not yet doing any writing. 3588:
bleeding into user space, with no response from Gwern and (apparently) no change in his behavior. (See
3537: 3509: 3477: 3435: 2815:
This soudns like a tricky one, but possible. Request for someone else to make a bot can be placed at:
564: 340:
Almost certainly an authorised bot becoming logged out, this is a problem with the pywikibot software.
3612:, and I believe it's reasonable to expect such desires to be respected. By the way, I don't know what 2997:
For every solution built, someone builds a better idiot. What about someone who cites from a book as
2668:
etc. ). Though the spirit of this policy is obvious, I would like to express some principles clearly:
697:
reverted blanking of unsourced claims of someone molesting children, thrice). I don't think that : -->
4256: 4175: 4142: 3636: 3633: 2640: 2625: 2364: 2294: 2178:, but as it's only a manual bot I won't mess with blocks again unless someone else find a problem. ā€” 1112: 1082: 757: 4467:{{NYCS S 42nd}} replaced by {{NYCS service|S - 42nd Street Shuttle (New York City Subway service|S}} 3668: 2437:
It is not a bot, but a person operating a piece of software to help them. As for the unlinking, see
1486: 949: 4463:|1a2a3c}} to replace {{NYCS 7 rush}} {{NYCS time|1a2a3c}}. If they are shuttle templates, such as: 4115: 4041: 4024: 3934: 3860: 3685: 2899: 2889:
Since the bot would scan the recent change list anyway it could look at only those edits that were
2544:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Mexico&curid=3966054&diff=79370151&oldid=79163821
2529: 2500:
I'm wondering if I should use this bot here on Knowledge (XXG); it's a semi-bot, not a full one. --
2325: 2123: 1716: 1515: 1465: 1435: 1324: 1152: 165: 3743: 2816: 1368:
f = codecs.open('hi-towns.csv', 'r', config.textfile_encoding) x = f.read().decode('utf8')
699: 4295: 3966: 3852: 3703: 3448:) and post a message to the mailing list. Did you read the documentation previously mentioned at 3161: 3071: 2825: 2596: 2516: 2222: 2196: 2098: 1763: 1682: 1470: 1440: 1328: 1301: 1275: 945: 646: 290: 280: 256: 246: 221: 211: 746: 3419: 2213: 2090: 561:
with 5 samples of ~53 reverts, 266 total (random time, go down a contrib list of 100) assuming
4065: 3979: 2984: 2853: 2798: 2785: 2564: 1935: 1888: 1839: 1799: 1736: 1500: 1490: 1400: 1379: 1327:
on Wikisource is an example of this, although several subcategories would be useful here. //
1260: 1226: 1065: 1027: 834: 470: 188: 3998: 3990: 3776: 4482: 4197: 3723: 3364: 3136: 2894: 2736: 2378:
There has been talk of a bot interface, but I don't know if it will ever be more than that.
2234: 2137: 2059: 1655: 1631: 1580: 1558: 1461: 1452: 1291: 1178: 4432: 3906: 3739: 3613: 3062: 2665: 2073: 1877: 1856: 1554: 1550: 1449: 1148: 913: 896: 309: 4513: 4134: 3622: 3181: 2621: 2349: 2291: 2277: 1333: 1250: 1218: 761: 753: 672: 113: 3672: 3233:
API. Not a wrapper or example in some particular language (unless there's a c++ example).
2441:, the links to words like "Saturday" are hardly relevent to the context of the article. 479:
Any specific examples? Both of the bots I see regularly reverting vandalism have a : -->
312:
to get a list of articles from an image page, it will be in the release version soon).
4382: 4374: 4303: 4173:
Hagerman suggested "allow" and "deny" as better parameters, which, of course,they are.
3712: 3677: 3363:
07:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC) yeah the AVB bots are not that smart to figure that out.
2709: 2689: 2476: 2442: 2405: 2395: 2379: 2315: 2119: 1860: 1803: 1776: 1754: 1740: 1192: 1130: 799: 772: 435: 341: 313: 4520: 4505: 4446: 4364: 4349: 4336: 4324: 4314: 4248: 4227: 4214: 4200: 4164: 4119: 4068: 4045: 4028: 3984: 3968: 3938: 3753: 3706: 3689: 3661: 3639: 3627: 3563: 3554: 3540: 3530: 3512: 3502: 3456: 3438: 3412: 3367: 3343: 3334: 3304: 3281: 3267: 3258: 3240: 3221: 3207: 3192: 3163: 3146: 3129: 3119: 3094: 3073: 3056: 3046: 3013: 2988: 2972: 2962: 2952: 2903: 2884: 2864: 2838: 2827: 2809: 2766: 2748: 2739: 2729: 2712: 2703: 2692: 2651: 2634: 2613: 2580: 2570: 2518: 2504: 2479: 2445: 2431: 2408: 2398: 2382: 2371: 2357: 2329: 2318: 2297: 2280: 2258: 2237: 2224: 2207: 2198: 2182: 2164: 2150: 2110: 2100: 2084: 2062: 2031: 2014: 2000: 1974: 1959: 1942: 1914: 1895: 1863: 1846: 1820: 1810: 1783: 1765: 1747: 1720: 1707: 1698: 1685: 1671: 1658: 1646: 1605: 1595: 1561: 1503: 1493: 1489:
has been down for some time now. Anyone who has it, I'd appreciate a mirror upload. ~
1472: 1455: 1442: 1423: 1407: 1386: 1351: 1338: 1317: 1303: 1277: 1263: 1253: 1206: 1181: 1159: 1141: 1067: 1029: 952: 939: 920: 903: 870: 850: 840: 807: 775: 764: 734: 702: 485: 473: 455: 438: 428: 395: 344: 334: 316: 300: 266: 231: 168: 4207: 3961: 3649:
The problem is simple - "refdeskbot" is archiving too soon. I have raised this point
3551: 3360: 3255: 3218: 3156: 3140: 3066: 2969: 2959: 2949: 2879: 2820: 2644: 2577: 2511: 2428: 2217: 2191: 2093: 2028: 1997: 1971: 1956: 1758: 1296: 1270: 1156: 1138: 727: 392: 331: 2664:
It is time we added a new section specifically dealing with assisted bots/software (
2276:
to make sure the categories stay empty. Does anybody have a bot that can do that? -
4345:
Are there any existing Java bot frameworks? I looked around and couldn't find any.
4333: 4211: 4161: 3975: 3499: 3453: 3416: 2980: 2848: 2835: 2793: 2700: 2559: 2549: 2368: 2204: 2179: 2107: 2081: 2069: 1928: 1881: 1832: 1795: 1732: 1704: 1514:
I have recently gotten the approval to run and have received a bot flag for my bot
1393: 1372: 1222: 1062: 1024: 910: 893: 831: 3001:
or any of a thousand other variants? Automated spellchecking is FTL. That's why
3445: 3005:
corrections (via AWB) are allowed, but fully automated "corrections" are not. --
1826:
I am not sure this is the right place to bring this up. I am not happy with some
4478: 4284: 4264: 4224: 4183: 4150: 3720: 3716: 3359:
Is it appropriate that I replaced the bot's warning with test3, and signed it?--
3296:
Do Wiktionary bot approval requests go on the same page as Knowledge (XXG) ones?
3126: 3116: 3053: 2745: 2684:
Always make extra sure there is consensus before making a large series of edits.
2672:
Assisted bots are defined as any software that allows rapid editing of articles.
2255: 2133: 1817: 1621: 1570: 1080:
Would this work better with sub pages like AfD? It would bmake archiving eaier.
847: 417:
The user may make "fair use" of the protected material as set out under the law.
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4087: 3617: 3581: 3189: 2726: 2344: 1348: 1314: 1203: 782: 481: 108: 3314:
but usually require some discussion about what is intended, first, either in
2072:
who was performing similar types of edits around the time in question. (See
1731:
I, and apparently, many other people are having problems with the actions of
3750: 3523: 3274: 3180:. Crossposting as this proposal is relevant to this policy (comment there). 3115:). Was concerned it was an unauthorized Bot, and possisbly doing damage? -- 2007: 1907: 1691: 1668: 1602: 881: 795: 452: 425: 3176:
I have made a proposal to let some bots be granted the rollback feature at
1703:
If you really want to program a bot, no. Blankly put, you need a compiler.
1545:
and disscusions that have stalled and are over60 days old without any edits
164:
at WP:ANI. Participation from people at this forum would be appreciated.
3973:
Great idea! I can help out with the pywikipedia section, if you'd like. ā€”
3311: 4456:
How do you command your bot? For example, as per a new agreement made at
4242:
Knowledge (XXG):Bureaucrats' noticeboard#Bluemoose/Martin apparently left
3078:
Thanks, I was just curious since I thought all bots had to be logged in.
2648: 2610: 2593:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots#"Robot-assisted disambiguation: U.S. Highway 1"
2496:(Spam reverted - AUTOLINKREMOVE - Please do not mass-add external links!) 1601:
usefully have been done on a somewhat more gradual and selective basis.
723: 3323: 2424:
appears to be operated by User:Colonies_Chris and the changelog url is
978:
A bot (or perhaps a script, or some other tool) would be very useful to
3429:
How can you contact the people responsible for the Python bot framework
1120: 1090: 1047: 366: 3948:
perhaps? If so it should include links to other important pages like
3924:
Obviously I'm open to refinement of this idea, but just as there is a
3759:
Would like to add a new section to this page, or a new page altogether
3319: 3315: 1290:
For those inclined to use meta icons on userpages, feel free to use {{
989:
generate an information feedable to a statistical analytical program (
4196:"Allow" and "deny" for whole categories would be a nice addition. -- 4098: 2546:
and had the only edit summary "robot", also, the bot didn't do much.
1039:). Perhaps it would be better to request expansion of those tools. ā€” 3700:
Is there a bot that automatically archives Wiki-project talk pages?
3300:
I can't find any way to link to a page specifically for Wiktionary.
2160:- summary of the conversation there: Is this your bot? Yes it is. -- 554:{\displaystyle \mu _{\bar {x}}=94.847\%\ \sigma _{\bar {x}}=3.359\%} 4079:
or else using a customised version of an existing tool such as the
791:(apparently a bug with the Google toolbar for Firefox) resulted in 745:
was when he reverted a page to its 2003 version in order to make a
2288:
Knowledge (XXG):Bot_requests#Category:Protected_deleted_categories
1243:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Reference desk#Failure of automated archiving
1106:
I am (being bold and) making this page live per the discussion at
1035:
Portions of this information can be obtained via the toolserver, (
490:
FWIW, when I looked at Tawkerbot2's accuracy rate I ended up with
3522:
bad, and you should be able to do anything you need using it. --
3125:
Seems to have stopped since I left a message on the talk page. --
2681:
A separate account is advised if many edits are going to be made.
4280: 4267: 4186: 4153: 4094: 1539:
Bot that are approved and wish to get approval for another task
1123: 1093: 355: 3766: 25: 3026:
I am unfamilar with bots to say the least but was curious if
2158:
nl:Overleg gebruiker:Thijs!#Overleg gebruiker:129.125.101.164
1876:
Martin, thanks for the response. I have moved my question to
1011:
was the edit a vandalism (possibly using parts of Tawkerbot2)
2847:
Thank you! I posted this suggestion to that page too now. --
1906:
Make yourself easier to contact then. Where did you go? --
749:. He seems to think that anyone reverting his edits must be 3178:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)#Rollback to the bots!
202:
Could someone please run a bot to replace all instances of
3214: 2367:, which is for retrieval only (although quite elegant). -- 2229:
Wouldnā€™t it be very likely that Ram-Man was talking about
1727:
Many users apparently having problems with cydebot actions
861:
How are bots given bot status? Please reply on talk page.
2619:
I just stopped the bot, but I disagree with "useless." --
930:
Which MediaWiki page is it? and can it be done on Wikia?
1988:(also redlinked). Both were typo's for real categories 986:
generate a list of people who have edited target article
4423: 4415: 4407: 4399: 4380:
A concern was raised regarding a new task performed by
3605: 3597: 3589: 3177: 2543: 2425: 1923:
Cyde, I am easy to contact. I have posted this problem
1827: 1414:
Project Page Entry clarification - spiders and dynloads
1232:
In particular, it is the force behind archiving of the
1051: 971:
Knowledge (XXG):Bot_requests#Bot_for_researchers_needed
792: 789: 742: 741:
He has no examples. The only time one of his edits was
370: 4294:
Currently, I have prototyped read-only code for using
993:
format is quite simple and popular) which would tell:
3030:
is an unauthorized bot, or simply one not logged in.
2046:
Thereā€™s a not-logged-in bot working under IP address
675: 649: 608: 567: 496: 4477:
These are just examples, and my bot was approved by
3746:, user pages, user talk pages and even a template. 2089:
As long as it keeps up it's ultra slow editing pace
2439:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (links)#Overlinking
2076:). I'll post a message on that page, just to see. 4101:that runs on a web server that you have access to. 1855:Surely the bot was removing the category due to a 688: 661: 635: 594: 553: 3107:See a super-human rate of edits coming from user 2363:Like a browser with HTTP. In addition, I know of 1980:Even further investigation shows that it removed 760:a bot. Sorry you guys have to deal with this. - 406:IDF fairuse and Orphanbot communication problems 2092:this doesn't seem to be a problem right now. ā€” 1323:Better yet, we should categorise them instead. 451:. Sorry, but I'm not fond of repeating myself. 4093:Write a bot in a sever-side lanuguage such as 4086:Write a bot in a client-side language such as 3989:OK, thanks. I propose the move of the current 3651:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Reference desk#refdeskbot 3616:he's using, or if it's registered/approved. - 3446:http://sourceforge.net/projects/pywikipediabot 2595:, in which I notified Rschen7754 that his bot 1753:I've left a message on the operator's page at 1371:Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, 4206:This template has been changed and is now at 4090:that you can operate through your browser. or 1549:which is something simialar that is uses for 1241:to step up and take over the archiving. See 1108:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots/Archive_17#Flagging 996:how often each individual edited this article 8: 2921:possible to automatically correct spelling. 2708:Yes, you're right, that is sensible. thanks 208:Image:Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom.svg 3915:Knowledge (XXG):Howto Contribute with a Bot 3373:Documentation for the Python bot framework. 1520:Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approvals 4440:Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval 4302:. I have an unapproved bot account called 3339:Thanks. I have not seen that page before. 1927:. Please give your comments over there. - 1295:to add the gear icon to your bot pages. ā€” 1151:after four days, because I've now removed 277:Image:Civil and Naval Ensign of France.svg 3926:Knowledge (XXG):Contributing_to_Wikipedia 680: 674: 648: 613: 607: 572: 566: 530: 529: 502: 501: 495: 210:? Would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! ā€” 193:Chair, Wikimedia Communications Committee 4001:as an overview page containing links to 3444:Wander over to the project's home page ( 1690:Yes, but it'd have to be something like 1536:Bots that are approved and waitng a flag 4062:Category:Lists of ambiguous human names 3944:That sounds find to me, something like 1259:I've banned it for being unsupervised. 4160:Good idea. Applied to my talk page. -- 3606:Gwern's second edit of my same subpage 3580:I and another user have complained to 3229:I'm looking for the definition of the 1221:is now rather orphaned, as its master 1046: 365: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3715:would probably do it if requested. -- 2274:Category:Protected deleted categories 2264:Category:Protected deleted categories 2146:) losing login every now and then? -- 1568:dilligent with regard to thier bots. 1557:and the use of subpages for each bot 1063:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1025:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 636:{\displaystyle H_{1}\ \mu <99.9\%} 7: 4130:I have just created a null template 3586:"Robot-assisted disambiguation" work 3203:the replies. TIA for any assitance. 2427:. Thank you for looking at this. 2212:Please correct me if I'm worng, but 3470:odd way of finding out the basics. 2699:doubt, go through the process". -- 2216:does not appear to support that. ā€” 1101:Knowledge (XXG):Requested bot flags 1002:how much new content has he changed 464:Automatic reverting is not harmless 3671:, as the bot serves them (and the 3645:Refdeskbot - administrators please 2660:new section needed "assisted bots" 2080:It is not the user in question. ā€” 1816:Blocked until Cyde contacts me -- 1533:Bots that have a aproved trial run 1499:Scratch that, it's working now. ~ 1245:, and also the good idea of using 630: 595:{\displaystyle H_{0}\ \mu =99.9\%} 589: 548: 520: 328:Special:Contributions/82.245.240.2 24: 3488:) 15:50, November 16, 2006 (UTC) 3215:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php 3151:Thanks for the heads up, blokced 2744:YepĀ !!!!!! gets auto reverted -- 2587:Bot making useless redirect fixes 2272:at CFD about having a bot patrol 1017:was the edit part of a revert war 3895: 2753:Apparently not on talk pagesĀ ;) 909:Also copied to the user's talk. 785:bot-blocking accidental blanking 356:one screen-name to rule them all 29: 4039:Bot Policy for a short while - 4011:Knowledge (XXG):Registered bots 3954:Knowledge (XXG):Registered bots 3450:m:Using the python wikipediabot 2050:, but there is no note on the 1638: 1632: 1628: 1622: 1587: 1581: 1577: 1571: 1014:was the edit a vandalism revert 888:. What talk page did you mean? 387:There is a different precedent 243:Image:Naval Ensign of Japan.svg 4373:Concern regarding new task of 4035:Knowledge (XXG):Creating_a_bot 4007:Knowledge (XXG):Creating a bot 3946:Knowledge (XXG):Creating a bot 2777:Suggestion: Auto-signature bot 2519:23:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 2505:11:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 2480:10:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 2464:10:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 2446:09:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 2432:08:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 2409:20:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 2399:21:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 2304:Useful categorisation of bots? 2032:18:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 2015:18:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 2001:18:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1994:Category:English cartographers 1986:Category:English Cartographers 1975:18:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1960:21:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1943:19:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1915:17:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1896:16:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1864:16:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1847:16:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1821:16:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1811:16:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 1429:AWB Spellcheck - assisted bot? 1234:Knowledge (XXG):Reference desk 698:99.9% claim is that accurate. 535: 507: 1: 4521:01:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 4506:01:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 4483: 4447:00:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 4365:16:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 4350:15:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 4337:13:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 4325:05:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 4315:05:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 4249:12:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 4215:17:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 4201:18:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 4165:09:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 4019:Knowledge (XXG):Types of bots 3958:Knowledge (XXG):Types of bots 3690:14:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 3681: 3662:03:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 3640:22:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 3628:21:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 3564:10:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 3555:16:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 3541:18:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 3531:17:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 3513:16:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 3503:16:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 3457:15:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 3439:09:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 3423:19:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 3368:07:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 3344:16:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3335:15:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3305:15:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3282:17:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 3268:15:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3259:13:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3241:09:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3222:09:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3208:08:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 3014:16:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2885:15:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2647:for continuing discussion. -- 2510:How do you detect "spam"Ā ? ā€” 2383:12:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2372:12:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2358:12:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2319:14:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 2298:16:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2281:02:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 2259:18:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2238:07:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2225:02:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2208:22:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2199:16:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2183:16:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2165:14:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2151:14:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2111:13:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2101:13:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2085:12:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2063:08:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 1699:19:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 1530:Bots that are being discussed 1481:Problems downloading Wikilink 239:Image:Japanese-War-Ensign.svg 4120:07:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 4069:22:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 4046:21:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 4029:16:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 4015:Knowledge (XXG):Bot requests 3985:14:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 3969:15:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 3950:Knowledge (XXG):Bot requests 3939:16:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 3909:page should really be named 3754:13:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 3707:08:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 3696:Archiving project talk page 3381:tell me where to find this? 3193:17:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 3164:07:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 3147:07:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 3130:20:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3120:20:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 3095:18:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 3074:04:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 3057:03:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 3047:02:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2989:18:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 2973:06:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2963:06:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2953:01:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 2904:15:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 2865:20:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 2839:12:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 2828:12:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 2810:11:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 2767:06:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 2749:18:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 2740:13:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 2730:12:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 2581:23:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 2330:11:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 1721:11:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 1708:16:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 1170:, you might want to look at 1005:was the edit marked as minor 980:the growing amount of people 662:{\displaystyle \alpha =.025} 410:Hi. Orphanbot keeps tagging 388: 4488: 4291:once it is more developed. 4033:OK, I have created the new 2999:"predominately" &nbsp; 2735:That is part of TawwkerBot 2713:20:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 2704:19:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 2693:06:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 2652:03:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 2635:03:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 2614:03:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 2571:01:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 2525:bot with bad edit summaries 1784:10:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 1766:01:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 1748:22:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 1686:15:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 1504:20:01, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 1494:06:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 1207:17:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 322:Unauthorized Anonymous Bot? 237:And the same for replacing 4537: 4481:. What should I do now? -- 4228:19:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 4003:Knowledge (XXG):Bot policy 3995:Knowledge (XXG):Bot policy 3911:Knowledge (XXG):Bot Policy 3598:Gwern's edit of my subpage 3402:) 16:43, 15 November 2006. 3139:, new one. Possible owner 1990:Category:Cabinet of Norway 1982:Category:Cabinet of norway 1955:Think he meant Tawker.Ā ;) 1473:06:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1456:06:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1450:WP:BOT#Spell-checking_bots 1443:06:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 1424:01:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 1213:Crypticbot - now orphaned? 1076:Request for approvals page 963:Bot for researchers needed 3518:languages. Python isn't 2415:Overactive unlinking bot. 2231:the contribs of Thijs!bot 1672:17:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1659:16:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 1647:08:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 1606:03:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 1408:15:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 1387:03:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 1352:20:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 1254:05:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1160:11:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 1142:13:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 1068:22:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1030:20:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1008:was the edit summary used 953:20:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 940:16:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 921:11:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 904:11:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 871:01:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 851:18:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 841:17:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 813:Would my bot be approved? 776:06:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 703:04:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 204:Image:RN-White-Ensign.svg 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots 4236:Bluemoose/Martin/Bluebot 3956:. There is also a page 3719:13:15, 4 December 2006 ( 3594:User:Csernica's response 3559:All sorted now, thanks. 2214:their Contributions link 2174:It's not on the list of 1596:05:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 1562:07:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 1339:05:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 1318:22:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 1304:03:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 1278:00:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 1264:12:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 1182:00:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 820:Talk:Main Page/Archive 1 808:01:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 765:11:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 735:03:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 486:03:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 474:23:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 456:23:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 439:22:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 429:21:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 396:00:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 345:23:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 335:22:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 317:15:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 301:13:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 267:02:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 232:02:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 169:22:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 3997:and the fresh start of 3655:User talk:87.102.21.223 3065:if its really crazy. ā€” 1542:Bot disscusion archives 1460:Thanks for the advice. 1309:Suggested section split 273:Image:French-Ensign.svg 245:would make my day.Ā ;) ā€” 4081:auto wikipedia browser 3928:I feel there shold be 3592:to a user subpage and 2924:What about a bot that 2338:Wiki Bot Communication 1155:from my watchlist. -- 991:comma-separated values 771:Tawkerbot is great. ā€” 690: 663: 637: 596: 555: 107:It is my opinion that 4298:to build a report of 3838:Requests for Approval 3476:comment was added by 3390:comment was added by 3172:Rollback to the bots! 3153:User talk:Skumarlabot 3028:User talk:84.244.80.3 2309:wikipedia functions. 1485:The external link to 1325:Category:Bot accounts 886:Special:Recentchanges 691: 689:{\displaystyle H_{0}} 664: 638: 597: 556: 480:99.9% success rate. ( 42:of past discussions. 4300:links to lyric sites 3999:Knowledge (XXG):Bots 3991:Knowledge (XXG):Bots 3960:that was started. ā€” 3590:one of Gwern's edits 2641:User talk:Rschen7754 2365:User:Yurik/Query API 673: 647: 606: 565: 494: 275:to be replaced with 3907:Knowledge (XXG):Bot 3800:Bot Approvals Group 1516:user:BetacommandBot 1392:This was solved. - 1153:User talk:OrphanBot 999:when did he edit it 174:Site notice updates 4296:Special:Linksearch 4106:I hope this helps! 3688: 3576:Bots in user space 3352:Modifying warnings 2755:Michael Billington 2502:LiverpoolCommander 2490:Spam reversion bot 2389:Addition to policy 1247:Daily transclusion 946:Special:Userrights 936:at war or at peace 932:General Eisenhower 867:at war or at peace 863:General Eisenhower 686: 659: 633: 592: 551: 103:Curps rollback bot 4504: 3903: 3902: 3676: 3626: 3489: 3411:documentation at 3403: 3198:Where is the API? 3103:Unauthorized Bot? 2987: 2883: 2862: 2856: 2807: 2801: 2156:Well, it is: see 2042:Not-logged-in bot 1800:User_talk:Cydebot 1737:User_talk:Cydebot 1642: 1591: 1239:another botmaster 1227:User talk:Cryptic 1042: 923: 743:reverted by a bot 620: 579: 538: 524: 510: 361: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4528: 4518: 4494: 4492: 4487: 4444:Francis Schonken 4430: 4429: 4426: 4418: 4410: 4402: 4246:Francis Schonken 4139: 4133: 4118: 4044: 4027: 3983: 3964: 3937: 3899: 3898: 3871:Activity monitor 3857: 3851: 3767: 3683: 3620: 3528: 3471: 3413:m:Pywikipediabot 3385: 3328:Connel MacKenzie 3320:the Beer parlour 3279: 3159: 3137:User:Skumarlabot 3092: 3087: 3082: 3069: 3044: 3039: 3034: 3007:Connel MacKenzie 2983: 2902: 2895:User:HagermanBot 2882: 2858: 2852: 2823: 2803: 2797: 2790: 2784: 2567: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2542:) did this edit 2514: 2462: 2460: 2354:Current Projects 2328: 2220: 2194: 2162:Francis Schonken 2148:Francis Schonken 2096: 2012: 1984:(redlinked) and 1941: 1938: 1931: 1912: 1894: 1891: 1884: 1880:'s talk page. - 1845: 1842: 1835: 1808: 1807: 1781: 1780: 1761: 1745: 1744: 1719: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1462:User:DraiconeBot 1406: 1403: 1396: 1385: 1382: 1375: 1299: 1292:User:Fluxbot/Bot 1273: 1040: 918: 908: 901: 892:is a talk page. 720: 715: 695: 693: 692: 687: 685: 684: 668: 666: 665: 660: 642: 640: 639: 634: 619: 618: 617: 601: 599: 598: 593: 578: 577: 576: 560: 558: 557: 552: 541: 540: 539: 531: 523: 513: 512: 511: 503: 359: 293: 288: 283: 259: 254: 249: 224: 219: 214: 162:raised the issue 159: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4536: 4535: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4514: 4454: 4424: 4416: 4408: 4400: 4385: 4381: 4378: 4277: 4238: 4137: 4131: 4128: 4114: 4058: 4040: 4023: 3974: 3962: 3933: 3896: 3892: 3855: 3849: 3828: 3761: 3736: 3698: 3647: 3578: 3524: 3472:ā€”The preceding 3431: 3386:ā€”The preceding 3375: 3354: 3298: 3275: 3200: 3174: 3157: 3105: 3090: 3085: 3080: 3067: 3042: 3037: 3032: 3024: 2918: 2898: 2821: 2788: 2782: 2779: 2723: 2662: 2589: 2569: 2565: 2560: 2555: 2550: 2527: 2512: 2492: 2458: 2456: 2417: 2391: 2340: 2324: 2306: 2266: 2252: 2218: 2192: 2176:Registered bots 2094: 2048:129.125.101.164 2044: 2008: 1936: 1933: 1929: 1908: 1889: 1886: 1882: 1840: 1837: 1833: 1805: 1804: 1778: 1777: 1759: 1742: 1741: 1729: 1715: 1679: 1620: 1569: 1512: 1483: 1431: 1416: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1380: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1362: 1360:Unicode problem 1336: 1311: 1297: 1288: 1271: 1215: 1134: 1104: 1078: 969:Crossposted to 965: 914: 897: 880:have a special 859: 815: 787: 718: 713: 676: 671: 670: 645: 644: 609: 604: 603: 568: 563: 562: 525: 497: 492: 491: 469:improvements.-- 466: 408: 324: 291: 286: 281: 257: 252: 247: 222: 217: 212: 200: 176: 111: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4534: 4532: 4524: 4523: 4475: 4474: 4471: 4468: 4453: 4450: 4433:WP:VPP#YouTube 4377: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4340: 4339: 4328: 4327: 4276: 4275:Java framework 4273: 4272: 4271: 4254:Yep, a shame. 4237: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4204: 4203: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4168: 4167: 4127: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4116:PocklingtonDan 4107: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4091: 4057: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4042:PocklingtonDan 4025:PocklingtonDan 3971: 3935:PocklingtonDan 3901: 3900: 3893: 3891: 3890: 3885: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3873: 3863: 3861:Creating a Bot 3858: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3835: 3829: 3827: 3826: 3819: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3796: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3772: 3770: 3760: 3757: 3735: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3697: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3646: 3643: 3604:; and finally 3577: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3460: 3459: 3430: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3374: 3371: 3353: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3316:the Grease pit 3297: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3234: 3227: 3199: 3196: 3173: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3144:203.185.57.117 3133: 3132: 3104: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3059: 3023: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3003:semi-automated 3000: 2992: 2991: 2966: 2965: 2917: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2900:PocklingtonDan 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2842: 2841: 2831: 2830: 2778: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2722: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2676: 2673: 2661: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2588: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2547: 2530:MelancholieBot 2526: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2491: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2449: 2448: 2416: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2390: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2375: 2374: 2339: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2326:PocklingtonDan 2305: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2265: 2262: 2251: 2250:The Red Button 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2132:) operated by 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2087: 2068:This could be 2043: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1918: 1917: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1850: 1849: 1828:recent actions 1814: 1813: 1791: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1769: 1768: 1755:User talk:Cyde 1728: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1717:PocklingtonDan 1678: 1675: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1511: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1430: 1427: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1367: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1342: 1341: 1332: 1310: 1307: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1217:It seems that 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1198: 1197: 1187: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1133: 1131:User:OrphanBot 1128: 1103: 1098: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1057: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1003: 1000: 997: 987: 976: 975: 964: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 925: 924: 906: 858: 855: 854: 853: 814: 811: 786: 780: 779: 778: 768: 767: 738: 737: 707: 706: 705: 683: 679: 658: 655: 652: 632: 629: 626: 623: 616: 612: 591: 588: 585: 582: 575: 571: 550: 547: 544: 537: 534: 528: 522: 519: 516: 509: 506: 500: 465: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 442: 441: 407: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 348: 347: 323: 320: 306: 305: 304: 303: 271:And one more: 199: 196: 195: 194: 191: 175: 172: 166:Dragons flight 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4533: 4522: 4519: 4517: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4502: 4498: 4493: 4491: 4486: 4480: 4472: 4469: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4459: 4451: 4449: 4448: 4445: 4441: 4436: 4434: 4427: 4422: 4419: 4414: 4411: 4406: 4403: 4398: 4395: 4392: 4389: 4384: 4376: 4372: 4366: 4363: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4351: 4348: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4338: 4335: 4330: 4329: 4326: 4323: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4313: 4307: 4305: 4301: 4297: 4292: 4290: 4289:perlwikipedia 4286: 4282: 4281:MediaWiki API 4274: 4269: 4266: 4262: 4261: 4258: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4247: 4243: 4235: 4229: 4226: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4213: 4209: 4208:Template:bots 4202: 4199: 4195: 4194: 4188: 4185: 4181: 4180: 4177: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4166: 4163: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4155: 4152: 4148: 4147: 4144: 4136: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4112: 4108: 4105: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4089: 4085: 4084: 4082: 4078: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4067: 4063: 4055: 4047: 4043: 4036: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4026: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3981: 3977: 3972: 3970: 3967: 3965: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3936: 3931: 3927: 3922: 3919: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3894: 3889: 3886: 3884: 3881: 3877: 3876:Status report 3874: 3872: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3864: 3862: 3859: 3854: 3848: 3844: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3836: 3834: 3831: 3830: 3825: 3824: 3820: 3818: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3808: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3797: 3795: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3785: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3774: 3773: 3771: 3769: 3768: 3765: 3758: 3756: 3755: 3752: 3747: 3745: 3741: 3733: 3728: 3725: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3705: 3701: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3684: 3679: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3660: 3659:87.102.21.190 3656: 3652: 3644: 3642: 3641: 3638: 3635: 3630: 3629: 3624: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3575: 3565: 3562: 3561:87.113.68.173 3558: 3557: 3556: 3553: 3548: 3542: 3539: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3529: 3527: 3521: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3511: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3501: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3475: 3469: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3458: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3437: 3428: 3424: 3421: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3392:87.112.74.253 3389: 3382: 3380: 3372: 3370: 3369: 3366: 3362: 3357: 3351: 3345: 3342: 3341:87.112.20.152 3338: 3337: 3336: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3303: 3302:87.112.20.152 3295: 3283: 3280: 3278: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3266: 3265:87.112.20.152 3262: 3261: 3260: 3257: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3242: 3239: 3238:87.112.20.152 3235: 3232: 3228: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3206: 3205:87.112.20.152 3197: 3195: 3194: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3171: 3165: 3162: 3160: 3154: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3145: 3142: 3141:User:Skumarla 3138: 3135: 3134: 3131: 3128: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3102: 3096: 3093: 3088: 3083: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3072: 3070: 3064: 3060: 3058: 3055: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3045: 3040: 3035: 3029: 3021: 3015: 3012: 3008: 3004: 2998: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2971: 2964: 2961: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2951: 2947: 2946:sophisticated 2943: 2937: 2935: 2934:differentiate 2931: 2927: 2922: 2916:Spellchecking 2915: 2905: 2901: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2881: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2866: 2861: 2855: 2850: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2824: 2818: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2806: 2800: 2795: 2787: 2776: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2738: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2728: 2720: 2714: 2711: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2691: 2683: 2680: 2677: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2667: 2659: 2653: 2650: 2646: 2645:User talk:NE2 2642: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2633: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2598: 2597:Rschen7754bot 2594: 2586: 2582: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2563: 2558: 2553: 2545: 2541: 2538: 2535: 2531: 2524: 2520: 2517: 2515: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2498: 2497: 2489: 2481: 2478: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2463: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2447: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2414: 2410: 2407: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2397: 2388: 2384: 2381: 2377: 2376: 2373: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2337: 2331: 2327: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2317: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2268:There's been 2263: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2249: 2239: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2223: 2221: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2188: 2184: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2112: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2099: 2097: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2074:contributions 2071: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2041: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2016: 2013: 2011: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1973: 1961: 1958: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1944: 1939: 1932: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1916: 1913: 1911: 1905: 1904: 1897: 1892: 1885: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1865: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1843: 1836: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1812: 1809: 1801: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1785: 1782: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1767: 1764: 1762: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1738: 1734: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1706: 1701: 1700: 1697: 1696:86.146.76.221 1693: 1688: 1687: 1684: 1683:Gray Porpoise 1676: 1674: 1673: 1670: 1660: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1641: 1635: 1627: 1625: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1607: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1590: 1584: 1576: 1574: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1544: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1509: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1492: 1488: 1480: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1468: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1438: 1428: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1421:62.134.227.14 1413: 1409: 1404: 1397: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1383: 1376: 1366: 1359: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1308: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1293: 1285: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1212: 1208: 1205: 1200: 1199: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1169: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1147:Forwarded to 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1109: 1102: 1099: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1075: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1059: 1058: 1056: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1043: 1038: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1004: 1001: 998: 995: 994: 992: 988: 985: 984: 983: 981: 974: 972: 967: 966: 962: 954: 951: 947: 943: 942: 941: 937: 933: 929: 928: 927: 926: 922: 919: 917: 912: 907: 905: 902: 900: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 874: 873: 872: 868: 864: 856: 852: 849: 845: 844: 843: 842: 839: 836: 833: 827: 823: 821: 812: 810: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 790: 784: 781: 777: 774: 770: 769: 766: 763: 759: 755: 752: 748: 744: 740: 739: 736: 733: 729: 725: 722: 721: 716: 708: 704: 701: 681: 677: 656: 653: 650: 627: 624: 621: 614: 610: 586: 583: 580: 573: 569: 545: 542: 532: 526: 517: 514: 504: 498: 489: 488: 487: 483: 478: 477: 476: 475: 472: 463: 457: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 443: 440: 437: 433: 432: 431: 430: 427: 423: 419: 418: 413: 405: 397: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 375: 373: 372: 368: 362: 357: 352: 351: 350: 349: 346: 343: 339: 338: 337: 336: 333: 329: 321: 319: 318: 315: 311: 302: 299: 298: 294: 289: 284: 278: 274: 270: 269: 268: 265: 264: 260: 255: 250: 244: 240: 236: 235: 234: 233: 230: 229: 225: 220: 215: 209: 205: 198:Quick request 197: 192: 190: 186: 185: 184: 180: 173: 171: 170: 167: 163: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 127: 124: 121: 118: 115: 110: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4515: 4489: 4484: 4476: 4455: 4452:Bot commands 4437: 4420: 4412: 4404: 4396: 4390: 4379: 4308: 4293: 4278: 4265:13 December 4255: 4239: 4205: 4184:18 December 4174: 4151:12 December 4141: 4129: 4110: 4077:existing bot 4066:TonyTheTiger 4059: 4056:Writing Bots 3929: 3923: 3920: 3904: 3866:List of bots 3833:Bot Requests 3821: 3814: 3805: 3798: 3791: 3782: 3775: 3762: 3748: 3737: 3734:Fair use bot 3702: 3699: 3675:). Thanks, 3648: 3631: 3609: 3579: 3538:87.112.15.14 3525: 3519: 3510:87.112.15.14 3478:87.112.15.14 3467: 3436:87.112.15.14 3432: 3408: 3383: 3378: 3377:Can someone 3376: 3358: 3355: 3322:. See also 3312:wikt:WT:VOTE 3299: 3276: 3230: 3201: 3175: 3109:141.84.69.20 3106: 3025: 3002: 2967: 2945: 2944:turned into 2942:sofisticated 2941: 2938: 2933: 2930:diferentiate 2929: 2925: 2923: 2919: 2890: 2780: 2724: 2687: 2663: 2620: 2603: 2590: 2536: 2528: 2499: 2495: 2493: 2420: 2418: 2392: 2343: 2341: 2307: 2267: 2253: 2171: 2140: 2126: 2117: 2077: 2070:User:JAnDbot 2045: 2009: 1968: 1909: 1859:discussion? 1815: 1796:User:Cydebot 1790: 1733:User:Cydebot 1730: 1702: 1689: 1680: 1677:Running bots 1665: 1623: 1572: 1548: 1523: 1513: 1484: 1466: 1436: 1432: 1417: 1370: 1363: 1312: 1289: 1261:Secretlondon 1238: 1231: 1223:User:Cryptic 1216: 1191:Agreed that 1186: 1184:Micoolio101 1177: 1171: 1167: 1166:If you hate 1164: 1135: 1111: 1105: 1081: 1079: 1044: 1041:Jun. 19, '06 1022: 977: 968: 944:The page is 915: 898: 889: 860: 828: 824: 816: 788: 711: 471:Chuck Marean 467: 448: 415: 409: 363: 325: 307: 296: 262: 227: 201: 189:Michael Snow 181: 177: 152: 146: 140: 134: 128: 122: 116: 106: 75: 43: 37: 4516:alphachimp. 4479:User:Tawker 4425:user rights 4401:actions log 4362:Mike Dillon 4347:Mike Dillon 4322:Mike Dillon 4312:Mike Dillon 4285:pywikipedia 4240:Please see 4198:Susan Davis 3816:Noticeboard 3704:perfectblue 3602:my response 3365:Betacommand 3324:wikt:WT:BOT 2891:first edits 2737:Betacommand 2235:Van helsing 2060:Van helsing 2027:Unblocked. 1656:Betacommand 1559:Betacommand 1526:six pages. 1510:Proposition 1453:Betacommand 1329:Pathoschild 1179:Micoolio101 878:Bureaucrats 754:malfeasance 669:I rejected 360:Jun. 6, '06 132:protections 36:This is an 4485:Imdanumber 4260:Farmbrough 4179:Farmbrough 4146:Farmbrough 4088:Javascript 3823:Newsletter 3793:Bot policy 3784:Dictionary 3584:about his 3582:User:Gwern 3091:di requiem 3043:di requiem 2721:Simple Bot 2622:Rschen7754 2292:TimBentley 2286:Copied to 2278:EurekaLott 1251:R. S. Shaw 1219:Crypticbot 1116:Farmbrough 1086:Farmbrough 762:EurekaLott 449:should not 144:pageĀ moves 95:ArchiveĀ 22 87:ArchiveĀ 20 82:ArchiveĀ 19 76:ArchiveĀ 18 70:ArchiveĀ 17 65:ArchiveĀ 16 60:ArchiveĀ 15 4409:block log 4383:VoABot_II 4375:VoABot_II 4304:Dillonbot 3930:something 3905:The main 3853:BAG Tools 3843:Adminbots 3744:WP:BJAODN 3713:Werdnabot 3673:help desk 3653:also see 3634:Canderous 3526:Cyde Weys 3407:There is 3277:Cyde Weys 3190:Sempronio 2981:Mr. Darcy 2817:WP:BOTREQ 2421:delinking 2270:some talk 2120:Thijs!bot 2118:Might be 2010:Cyde Weys 1910:Cyde Weys 1692:Brainfuck 1286:meta icon 1193:OrphanBot 1168:OrphanBot 950:Stradenko 882:MediaWiki 773:Omegatron 751:guilty of 447:I really 424:request. 138:deletions 4501:contribs 4417:flag log 4394:contribs 4263:, 12:50 4182:, 00:04 4149:, 21:24 3963:xaosflux 3777:Overview 3552:Plugwash 3486:contribs 3474:unsigned 3400:contribs 3388:unsigned 3361:Vercalos 3256:Plugwash 3254:server. 3219:Carnildo 3158:xaosflux 3068:xaosflux 2970:HighInBC 2960:Carnildo 2950:HighInBC 2928:changed 2880:HighInBC 2822:xaosflux 2786:unsigned 2763:contribs 2630:contribs 2607:contribs 2578:Plugwash 2540:contribs 2513:xaosflux 2429:Bdelisle 2219:xaosflux 2193:xaosflux 2172:Update: 2144:contribs 2130:contribs 2095:xaosflux 2058:page. -- 2029:Syrthiss 1998:Syrthiss 1972:Syrthiss 1957:Syrthiss 1760:xaosflux 1487:WikiLink 1467:Draicone 1437:Draicone 1298:xaosflux 1272:xaosflux 1157:Omniplex 1139:Omniplex 1121:22 June 1091:20 June 393:Ardric47 332:Ardric47 120:contribs 4512:to do? 4458:WT:NYCS 4162:Ligulem 4156:(GMT). 3976:Mets501 3883:History 3686:rtinp23 3500:RedWolf 3454:RedWolf 3409:partial 2849:ZeroOne 2794:ZeroOne 2369:Ligulem 2205:Ram-Man 2180:Ram-Man 2108:Ram-Man 2082:Ram-Man 2078:Update: 1930:Ganeshk 1883:Ganeshk 1834:Ganeshk 1639:Connect 1588:Connect 1395:Ganeshk 1374:Ganeshk 1294:}}: --> 1126:(GMT). 1096:(GMT). 1037:Example 758:must be 700:Kotepho 282:Nightst 248:Nightst 213:Nightst 39:archive 4431:, see 4270:(GMT). 4225:Tawker 4189:(GMT). 4135:nobots 4126:nobots 4099:Python 3740:WP:FUC 3717:ais523 3610:at all 3420:(talk) 3379:please 3318:or in 3231:actual 3127:KeithB 3117:KeithB 3081:Dark j 3063:WP:AIV 3054:Tawker 3033:Dark j 2746:Tawker 2710:Martin 2690:Martin 2666:WP:AWB 2477:Martin 2443:Martin 2406:Martin 2396:Martin 2380:Martin 2316:Martin 2295:(talk) 2256:Tinlv7 2134:Thijs! 1878:WP:CFD 1861:Martin 1857:WP:CFD 1818:Tawker 1624:Essjay 1573:Essjay 1555:WP:RFA 1551:WP:CFD 1501:Booya 1491:Booya 1149:WP:ANI 1119:22:09 1089:15:13 848:Tawker 518:94.847 436:Martin 422:WP:AMA 342:Martin 314:Martin 310:WP:AWB 150:rights 126:blocks 3888:Types 3807:Guide 3669:WT:RD 3618:dcljr 3326:. -- 3182:Tizio 2727:Jinxs 2345:ENIAC 1735:(see 1705:Dylan 1522:into 1349:Yurik 1315:Yurik 1204:carlb 1061:it?-- 1055:: --> 1048:freak 911:Misza 894:Misza 783:Curps 747:point 546:3.359 482:ESkog 389:above 374:: --> 367:freak 292:llion 258:llion 241:with 223:llion 206:with 109:Curps 16:< 4497:Talk 4388:BRFA 4268:2006 4257:Rich 4187:2006 4176:Rich 4154:2006 4143:Rich 4113:) - 4095:Perl 3980:talk 3751:Oden 3637:Ordo 3623:talk 3600:and 3520:that 3482:talk 3468:very 3417:Russ 3415:. -- 3396:talk 3332:wikt 3213:See 3186:Caio 3155:. ā€” 3113:talk 3022:Bot? 3011:wikt 2985:talk 2926:only 2854:talk 2819:. ā€” 2799:talk 2759:talk 2643:and 2639:See 2626:talk 2601:talk 2591:See 2566:Toth 2534:talk 2350:Talk 2138:talk 2124:talk 2056:user 2052:talk 1992:and 1937:talk 1925:here 1890:talk 1841:talk 1806:DDS 1779:DDS 1757:. ā€” 1743:DDS 1669:Alai 1633:Talk 1603:Alai 1582:Talk 1524:five 1402:talk 1381:talk 1173:this 1124:2006 1113:Rich 1094:2006 1083:Rich 1052:talk 1045:< 890:This 876:The 796:SPUI 794:. -- 657:.025 643:and 628:99.9 625:< 602:and 587:99.9 453:El_C 426:El_C 371:talk 364:< 326:See 114:talk 4461:--> 4287:or 4210:-- 4097:or 4038:--> 3993:to 3614:bot 3330:- 3009:- 2932:to 2649:NE2 2611:NE2 2457:Ans 2352:) ( 2054:or 1334:map 1249:. - 1137:-- 1110:. 934:ā€¢ ( 865:ā€¢ ( 857:How 832:MDD 822:). 724:Lar 412:IDF 297:(?) 279:. ā€” 263:(?) 228:(?) 156:RfA 4499:| 4495:( 4435:. 4334:RM 4244:-- 4212:RM 4138:}} 4132:{{ 4013:, 4009:, 4005:, 3952:, 3856:}} 3850:{{ 3596:; 3484:ā€¢ 3452:? 3398:ā€¢ 3273:-- 3217:-- 3188:, 3184:, 2897:- 2863:) 2857:| 2836:RM 2808:) 2802:| 2789:}} 2783:{{ 2765:) 2761:ā€¢ 2701:RM 2632:) 2628:- 2461:ll 2356:) 2290:. 1694:-- 1636:ā€¢ 1585:ā€¢ 1553:/ 1337:) 1331:(/ 948:-- 938:) 916:13 899:13 869:) 838:96 835:46 806:) 802:- 726:: 651:Ī± 631:% 622:Ī¼ 590:% 581:Ī¼ 549:% 536:ĀÆ 527:Ļƒ 521:% 508:ĀÆ 499:Ī¼ 484:) 391:. 187:-- 91:ā†’ 4503:) 4490:1 4428:) 4421:Ā· 4413:Ā· 4405:Ā· 4397:Ā· 4391:Ā· 4386:( 4109:( 3982:) 3978:( 3729:) 3727:C 3724:T 3721:U 3682:a 3678:M 3625:) 3621:( 3480:( 3394:( 3111:( 3086:e 3038:e 2860:@ 2851:( 2805:@ 2796:( 2757:( 2624:( 2604:Ā· 2599:( 2561:a 2556:z 2551:A 2548:ā†’ 2537:Ā· 2532:( 2459:e 2348:( 2141:Ā· 2136:( 2127:Ā· 2122:( 1940:) 1934:( 1893:) 1887:( 1844:) 1838:( 1643:) 1629:( 1592:) 1578:( 1405:) 1399:( 1384:) 1378:( 1225:( 1050:| 973:. 830:~ 804:C 800:T 798:( 732:c 730:/ 728:t 719:+ 714:+ 682:0 678:H 654:= 615:1 611:H 584:= 574:0 570:H 543:= 533:x 515:= 505:x 369:| 287:a 253:a 218:a 158:) 153:Ā· 147:Ā· 141:Ā· 135:Ā· 129:Ā· 123:Ā· 117:Ā· 112:( 50:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 15
ArchiveĀ 16
ArchiveĀ 17
ArchiveĀ 18
ArchiveĀ 19
ArchiveĀ 20
ArchiveĀ 22
Curps
talk
contribs
blocks
protections
deletions
pageĀ moves
rights
RfA
raised the issue
Dragons flight
22:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Michael Snow
Image:RN-White-Ensign.svg
Image:Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom.svg
Nightst
a
llion
(?)
02:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘