Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots/Requests for approval/Archive 12

2178:(that is the probability of the anchor linking to other pages is small), and then we look for the first occurrence of any unambiguous anchor, since the link should be introduced as early as possible in the page. However we exclude section headings as per linking guidelines. The trade off here is between the least ambiguous link and its location in the page. We are working on a better weighting formula for combining these two factors instead of simply filtering by ambiguity and finding the first occurrence from the remaining. However such a formula is harder to justify. 3459:, it's less about the difficulty of filling out the wikitext form than it is convenience. The wikitext editor wasn't intended for filling out forms, and as I filled out my most recent one, I had to constantly check if I was typing in the form text or a comment instead of where my response was supposed to go. I didn't have any features like autocompletion or tabbing to the next form field, either. I don't find BRFAs very complex to start; it's just that having a HTML form instead of a wikitext one is a nicer experience, in my opinion. 289:

such deletions will break links between Harvard inline citations and the full bibliography entry, and also between short footnotes and the full bibliography entry. An issue not mentioned in the discussion, but which I now bring up, is that "author = Staff" is meaningful and probably intended by the editor who created the citation, while the examples given in the bot approval indicate only "chaff" would be removed, that is, obvious mistakes that no editor would have put in if the editor had noticed it.

4029:, the problem is that we exceeded the post-expand include size limit, so some templates were left unexpanded. We currently have 16 BRFAs running, which is more than I've seen for a while, so that's probably the culprit. The only fix I can think of right now is to remove some transcluded BRFAs, which of course isn't ideal at all; on the other hand, the number of trial-completed BRFAs also seems quite high, so maybe a BAG member or two could look into closing them. 35: 1249: 1664:, or bots that edit only their or their owner's userspace (unless otherwise disruptive), or read-only bots, or bots that have been approved for a trial run by a BAG member, etc." is more likely to lead to well-meaning newbies deciding that their particular trial run is ok and getting themselves blocked than it is to clarify things for people who've actually read and understood 4023: 3015:

typo, including the title of the page it occurred in and the surrounding context. And of course I would not have edited discussion pages. Please note that I'm not challenging the closure in itself. It's a matter of tact; it's about building a friendly space for potential bot operators: I'm afraid the

2991:

I read the BRFA, and the responses looked reasonable to me. There was no indication in the request that the bot would be able to avoid false fixes of text like "the composer's name is sometimes misspelled as 'Giuseppi Verdi'." There was also no indication of which namespaces the bot would operate in;

1639:

I think this contradiction needs to be addressed. I believe that the bot approval wording should take precedence, as limited testing by read-only bots or bots that edit only in their own user space is generally harmless and should not need approval. (Not to mention, as pointed out to me by a WP admin

288:

GoingBatty links the words "this previously approved request" to the approval for BattyBot 24. The issue in the discussion is whether it is appropriate to delete cite template parameters such as "author = Staff" by bot. One issue is whether there is consensus for such deletions. Another issue is that

3785:

No approval is needed if you are manually posting it (this would be considered more like a script than an automated bot, I suppose). Feel free to explain the nature of the program briefly in the edit summary; you might consider creating a page in your userspace with some info about it, including the

1154:

went through a BRFA, and identified itself as exclusion compliant, and then was flagged. A recent RfC about bot messages prompted me to review the opt-out instructions for several bots that leave messages. I noticed that all of them except ReferenceBot has instructions on how to opt out. I posted a

555:

related template), the bot would ignore the entire article, so as not to cause confusion. However, if your point is that editors might be confused to see that the bot edited one article but not another, I hope they would come visit the bot's user page (where I would post a clarification explaining

149:

We'd like to run the increased invites per day for the full 4 weeks of the trial period. This will permit us to run a full analysis of the data in the timeframe of the Individual Engagement Grant, the final report for which is due January 1st. Thanks for considering this during the trial period.

3297:

What I say is that the bot operator is unwilling to see a problem, and even more unwilling to work towards a solution, which I think enough reasons for not letting this operator operate this bot. Look, I'm not a bot operator and when a bot operator decides he lets his bot perform tasks that should

2718:

Again, the bot cannot understand images outside of their digital nature. It can't figure out free vs non-free, and this looks like a case that the uploader opted to select non-free as unsure of the best solution. Thus, the person that put the tag on that without questioning if it should be free is

2486:

If the rationale has no explaination of why a higher-than-normal resolution image is provided (and in the range of ~0.2 MP or higher), it is completely appropriate to tag that with a non-free reduce template and let the bot handle it. It is up to the image uploader or those using the image to make

2291:

So to rephrase and ensure that I'm getting the correct idea. First we need to distinguish between easy v/s difficult links. The easy edits correspond to the mechanical questions and the difficult links correspond to the ambiguous links. It is possible that majority of the links have some ambiguity

2196:

linked to carbon dioxide, but not carbon monoxide, because we had data about carbon dioxide and not carbon monoxide. The common thread arising here was similarly positioned terms in the sentence and although we don't have supporting data, we are working on ways to identify such links and introduce

122:

invites per day since last Wednesday. So far, we have had no technical problems and positive feedback about the game is coming in. (One editor intends to use TWA in a second education program course. Another education program member is adapting the game for a sandbox tutorial). Several editors

3816:

Thanks for the help I finished with the first table using output from the program if you want to check it out. Will also be working on updating the rest of the page and maybe hunting for other things that need updated like this. If you have any suggestions of similar projects as this let me know.

3144:

The intention of the policy is not to forbid bots from recategorising biographical articles into broader categories. "1 BC births" is a subset of "0s BC births", and the latter can thus be safely substituted by a bot; if 1 BC is an erroneous categorisation, so is 0s BC, and they will both be as a

2877:

was a completely ridiculous reduction where Theo bot fights Dash bot. The Dashbot reduced version was 325*502, which is 0.16MP. (I think this is because Dashbot looked at image width as well, conservatively allowing for larger thumbnail preferences) The original was clearly low resolution, any

2576:

The Esther image has a poor rationale to justify "the graphics to the game are important", particularly when the image started at 1080p resolution. ("To show off the beautiful graphics" is not a proper rational - in contrast to the Warlungulong image where the rational explains that the detail is

2177:

Another error with this approach, is that finding the correct anchor text for the link itself can be tricky. The approach we use here is that we look at all possible anchors (words where a link can be inserted) for the target page across Knowledge (XXG), filter such that anchors are not ambiguous

2161:

and would like to respond to them. I was pleasantly surprised to look at the level of detail in which the edits were analysed by Josh. Although I am not an experienced wikipedia editor with thousands of edits under my belts, until such time, I would still like to improve Knowledge (XXG) using the

2468:

Read second to last paragraph. Images can be correctly tagged, and still have negative results. You could place an onus on the revision-deleting administrator to review the image, but that is not done - of the files I checked, not once was a downscale reverted. It's clear that either process is

523:

Looking over the expressions, they seem quite specific, and unlikely to have any matches that GoingBatty didn't intend. I am concerned that it would be quite confusing for editors to observe that citations that don't have ref=harv to have the author parameter changed while citations that do have

321:

or similar templates, the fact that it COULD do so is very troubling. Therefore, I will be manually reverting each of the bot's edits that commented out "Staff". I've posted the bot's find and replace rules below in the hope we can have further discussion on how to keep the bot task running to

3832:

If you want to let it run automatically and periodically, then yes it would be a bot. As far as how to cite, programs don't make edits - editors do (or editor controlled bots do). You could write up at least a description of your program and include it in the edit summaries. As for as actual

3769:

If I use this to generate the markup but do not autopost does this still need approved. Also how do cite the program or let other editors of the page know that is how the data is being generated. Would it be better to make it truely autoupdate periodically as a full on bot? Thanks for any help

2559:, it is nearer 0.2MP, the rationale is suitable and justifies the actual size of the upload, not an imaginary number. I considered all the questions I posed right at the top of this section when I uploaded the image, but I have no confidence that the tagger, bot, or admin would do the same. - 186:

Because of the timeframe, and our desire to gather meaningfully more data during the collection period, I would like to increase invites this week. Of course, we'll be mindful of any new technical issues or objections and not 'overdo it'. In this trial phase we only want enough data to draw

3533:'s header, for example, makes it very clear that one can use a tool/script to make it easier, but it in no way is confusable as being inherently part of the reporting process. Furthermore, I agree with Anomie's solution: the user script should self-generate any/all buttons related to it. -- 2421:

mean? It used to mean the current file is too large. Now it means, the current file needs to be 0.1 megapixels. For many editors, it still means the former. Editors will not consider whether the file should be 0.1 megapixels, only that it is too large - this is the intuitive expectation,

1279:

Since the bot bot operator is refusing to address a basic issue of providing opt out instructions for a bot that is opt-out compliant I am requesting either a revocation of permission until such instructions are posted or until the bot passes a BRFA which is clearly marked as non-compliant.

2267:

I think this is an area that you need strong AI for, and we just don't have that yet. All the mechanical questions are easy enough to sort out, but as you say the problems with Dairy and Protein are difficult. In fact, they're so difficult I'm willing to bet that normal humans wouldn't

380:

Would you please state which version of regular expressions the bot uses, so the rules can be interpreted with greater confidence? Also, it might be helpful to add a plain-English description of the intent of the rule for the benefit of those not familiar with regular expressions.

3298:

not have been done in the first place (whoever gave part of the permission to do it) then the bot wins if the bot operator puts his umbrella out and claims by high and low they did nothing wrong... unless you people here say no to such irresponsible behaviour of the bot operator.

145:

machine-learning algorithm. We exclude editors who have never made an edit, and also exclude those who are blocked. We have been monitoring activity from these new editors and continue to check on whether or not they're causing any maintenance hassles for experienced editors.

1905:

I would like to request permission to expand the content this bot runs on beyond medical content. Not only will approval be required before this occurs but we also must check with our partners at Turnitin and we need to develop mechanisms to address all the flagged concerns.

136:

Now that we know what the rate is, in order for us to demonstrate statistically significant impact we will need to increase the number of invites during the trial period. I'd like to request we raise the daily invite level from 100 per day to 300 per day. (500 would be even

1755:

I'm a bit out-of-date on current consensus, but I'd say a reasonable rule is: as soon as you're editing so fast you can't check all the edits by hand, you need approval, as soon as you're editing so fast that you're screwing up people's watchlists, you need a bot flag too.

1819:, was denied because it was not possible-you were requesting access for tewiki, not enwiki. If you bot is only going to be reading your sandbox and does not require a flag you can just do it; if you need flagging for high api use please submit an enwiki request. — 2165:

The way we generate links is that the links in a source page are suggested on the basis of people using that page as a waypoint towards the target pages, across many instances. Thus a link at that place, would have helped the people reach the target page faster.

3044:. We do not give out bot flags for single-use tasks that involve such a small numbers of edits and should only be done manually. There are many editors performing spell-checking in Knowledge (XXG) from their normal accounts. You are welcome to help on that. -- 2322:

policy? Here are some things I consider - the size of the source image, the detail in the source image, the quality of the scan and encoding. What things does Theo's Little Bot consider? Only whether it's greater than 0.1 megapixels, an arbitrary number

3444:

Personally, I don't see the need. BRFAs are fairly easy to fill out. Even on my first one, the commented notes guided me through the entire thing step-by-step, and I had no problems. Has there been concern anywhere that BRFAs are difficult to fill out? ~

2736:

Masem, everyone reading this page already knows how the bot works. We can use the guillotine to trim hair too, but you can't defend accidental decapitations with "all a guillotine does is cut stuff". In this case, the bot and the process surrounding it

1462:. We would like to renew this bot since we are going to start new phase of our work in this area. The specification of the bot will stay exactly the same as the one we have already got the approval for. I do appreciate your guidance on this process. 1512:

Yes, it's certainly good practice to run a new BRFA in this cases, to allow consideration of the task's continued relevance, the new operator, any tweaks or updates that could/should be made. It would be unlike to result in a rejection, in any case. -

3786:

GitHub URL, that you can link to in the edit summary. I don't see a pressing reason to make this a bot given how often I imagine the data is updated, but if you think it should be automatic after doing it for a while, we can go down that road then. —

2546:

is unsuited to show the game's graphics as specified by the rationale and article image caption. Those are absolutely the reasons why the file has to be larger than 0.1MP, rationales have never explicitly stated why images are larger than the 0.1MP

1805: 2971:

apparently ignoring that I explicitly stated the 'bot' would have been manually operated. Denying a BRFA within few minutes from the first reply, when the task has actually been carried out by someone else, is not a great display of sensitivity.

1536:. From what we understand we do not need approval for this sort of work. Please advise if we are wrong. There is support for the idea in a number of places. We hope to have a proof for concept soon. Will only run on medical articles initially. 2879: 2784: 570:

Yes, my concern is that editors might be confused by the bot acting differently in different articles. I also think that the situation should first be resolved by the ongoing discussion, and then the result of the discussion documented at

2292:

and fall under the difficult category. This distinction can be made on the basis of the output of dab_solver.py and and a threshold on the relevancy scores. The difficult links shall then be inserted with the help of experienced editors.

3858:) .. some concerns have been raised by multiple users about how it handles bare URLs and the response from the author is that is how it was designed and approved. How do we open new discussion/concerns about an approved active bot? -- 1801: 490:

I think it is premature to delete the author = staff parameter because discussion is still ongoing. Also, I don't think the original bot approval applies to text intentionally composed by an editor, rather than "chaff".

2782:

that editors can. The bot should be conservative, if the image needs resizing below 0.15MP, then that should be a manual process, where the right questions can be asked. The bot should place images below 0.15MP into

2169:

One error with this approach is that humans do not automatically consider the wiki linking guidelines while using it. However this issue can be mitigated by filtering links which refer to countries and originate from

1402:

templates should not be included in this CS1 category. I appreciate that you opened up the RfC (and fixed the wikilink) to discuss that issue. If the result of the RfC is that the error checking is removed from the

2422:

regardless of bot implementation. Right now, there is no way to tag images for reduction and for that resulting image to be larger than 0.1 megapixels. Even when an image is unambiguously high definition, I'm told

1479:

The request you link to not for an approved bot, but for a bot approved for trial. Did you have another request in mind? If not, please do file a new request and mention in the discussion field the old request. -

1799:

Hi I would like to use my bot account, RahmanuddinBot which was denied bot access earlier. I would be using category.py to retrieve few list of articles on my sandbox pages. Please approve it for a period of 25

3597:

For that specific editor, it appears more like semi-automated behavior than automated behavior in my opinion. Irregular times between edits, 3-4 minute gaps between different types of edits (setup time), and a

1228:

Ive never triggered the bot and really dont have a need to opt out. However a RfC prompted me to look into it. That should work, but for someone not familiar there is zero documentation on the bots user page.

2074:

FYI. I have put the archives back in chronological order, and broken up the massively bloated Archive 4, which had grown to over a million bytes. Recent discussions were moved from Archive 1 to Archive 12. –

3616: 2185:. The reason is that European classical music redirects to classical music across Knowledge (XXG), which makes it an unambiguous anchor. And it is the first unambiguous anchor to appear in the article. 2335:, the answer is to reduce it to 0.1 megapixels regardless of its content. This degradation in quality is a one way process, as previous versions are deleted, users cannot revert, information is lost. 2252:

Given that I am inexperienced in editing, I would like to work together with expert editors to augment the bot with AI rules, such that most of the edits are not shoddy and the utility is maximized.

2701:

has been reduced and the previous versions have been deleted. Admins do not review the downsized files, and how can they, given the amount of pointless reduces that are forced through the system? -

2602:

would still be saved as a useful image? That too was reduced to 0.1MP. If not, we do not have a suitable process in place for the operation of this bot, and we should stop this task until we do. -

2222:. The first occurrence of renaissance was preceded with the word high. We shall take care to exclude the anchors where in conjunction with preceding or succeeding words they can link to other pages. 1076: 1733:). I kept my editing rate low and checked each diff. I've identified another list of 185 pages that could benefit from the same fix; I would like to work through those a bit faster if possible. 1459: 1740:

isn't much help: "In general, processes that are operated at higher speeds, with a high volume of edits, or are more automated, may be more likely to be treated as bots for these purposes" --

3499:

I can't say I'm very fond of having a button that just leads to a page saying some random userscript needs to be installed. Why not have your user script insert the button when it's enabled?

3346:

to the bot operator, which is the actual point of contention. If you'd done that before coming here, rather than accuse them of flouting policy, this matter might've been resolved hours ago.

2332: 1774: 2521:

The rationale does not give any reason why the image needs to be larger than 0.1MP, so someone reviewing images and seeing a full 1080p image has no reason to question the need to reduce. --

1902:

EranBot has been running successfully on medical content for 6 months. It has picked up more than 200 cases of copyright violations and for issues it flags is right more than half the time.

1726: 2433:

I propose we stop TLB's task 1 from running, and only restart it when we have a better process and implementation in place to stop its pointless overuse and resulting errors shown above. -

2311: 4003:

Can you take a look at this page and the included templates - something is breaking the page - see the errors in the approved requests (sometimes missing) and denied requests sections. —

2935:

at the Village Pump. The general consensus is that the current implementation is flawed, and there are multiple easy to implement fixes. I don't want to waste my time with shit such as

1079:

which has been marked as expired? I have declared that the trial of the bot is complete, even if it has not made the required number of edits as it will not edit until at least 6 months.

3883:

is the venue. There's no dedicated page or process for this. Most interested parties would be watching either. Usually these get resolved on talk pages or here or, if all fails, ANI. —

2741:

an error. There is no oversight at any point, the tagger, bot and admin do not review the image or its use. Until we have that process in place, we should not be operating the bot. -

187:

meaningful conclusions; this is not the time to promote the game to the broadest possible audience (hopefully good results will permit us to do that in the next phase). I will notify

2147: 98: 93: 88: 76: 71: 1640:

long ago, unless a server admin is looking at usage logs, or a checkuser is looking at the user agent, nobody's ever going to be able to tell if a read-only bot is running anyway.)

1816: 63: 4059:

You can thank Cyberbot II 5a, for transcluding a massive page related to the trial. It's grown to a massive size. I've now changed it to a link, which has fixed the problem. :p—

2992:

archived pages may have been undesirable to edit with this bot. By the time all of that would have been worked out, the fixes could already have been done manually. And they were.

2211:

states that links should not be placed in the boldface reiteration of the title in the opening sentence of a lead which was specifically hard coded into the rules inside the bot.

3851: 3118: 3082: 3167:) – which imho is neither the outcome of the CfD discussion, nor allowed by bot policy. "Dual" upmerges in this sense are not allowed on biographical articles by bot policy. -- 2007:

I object. I have that page watchlisted because I want to see what is being proposed as an automated administrator-level account, but I don't have the patience to wade through

1837: 1110: 605:. By the way, I don't have any particular preference about how to deal with institutional authors, I just think any well-developed style should have some specified approach. 3797:

To clarify one point: When manually posting it, you are expected to be reviewing the edit to make sure it really is sensible just as you would with any other edit, not just

3654:

was the preferred name (it's not) because they correct an inaccuracy. Most of his edits seem fine; it looks like he tried to correct that mistake after you brought it up. —

2824:, many reductions take place with editors oblivious until it's too late. This could be automated, or you could place the onus onto the taggers, I would prefer the former. - 1301: 934: 245: 2538:

Needing reduction and "needing reduction to 0.1 megapixels" are different things. Admins are not reviewing the resized images. Hence the example above of the reduction of

1660:

I don't find this contradiction very interesting: in the vast majority of cases, a bot must be approved to be run. Confusing that with "except for very limited testing in

2957: 2931:, this is where bots are re-assessed. Yet neither the bot author or any of the bot approvals group have made any comment. Aside from the discussion above, there's also 2907:

This should be happening already. The proposals above, if implemented, should result in a reduction of the pointless resizes and make reviewing files more manageable. -

3936:

I guess that AnomieBOT probably does similar maintenance in other situations. If this is a mature capability of AnomieBOT, perhaps the instructions should be revised.

2036: 1992: 1318:

templates. That style has hardly any date format restrictions; the users of that template have never been approached about whether they favor these restrictions, until

205: 115: 2698: 2451:

The bot is working fine, but editors need to recognize the reduce tag should only be for images far outside the range. That's a behavior problem, not a bot problem. --

2352: 3277:

upmerge proposed to begin with, and why did none of the CfD participants nor the closer comment on it? It seems unfair to lay the blame squarely on the bot operator.

3159:

Well, the bot operator interpreted that besides recategorizing the "birth by year" cat to the parent "birth by decade" category (which is unproblematic), they should

1672: 1495:

I'm considering resurrecting some of DQ's bot functions. Specifically for now, I'd start with UAA Bot reported usernames. Would I need a new BRFA? I already have

2188:

The second issue with this is that, although it can do multiple edits in the same page, it does not link pages which were not on the paths taken by people. So, the

3422: 2878:

further reduction is needless. Can the bot parse file history comments? If so, if the previous version was already marked reduced, it should place the file into

2577:

discussed by sources in the article.) You're blaming the bot for something it is only told to do by editors well aware of NFC policy's minimal use requirement. --

2162:

best of my talents. Major concerns were with the exact process of link addition rather than the links themselves. I believe this is something which can be fixed.

663:

now to post a comment!|Meld je aan of registreer je om een reactie te plaatsen!|Meld je nu aan om een reactie te posten\.|Log (nu )?in om een reactie te plaatsen\.

3312:: "Assignment of person categories should not be made using a bot"), which you also should know, and not react with indignation against me for pointing it out. -- 2932: 134:

Our playthrough rate is about 1 for every 150 invites. This is entirely normal for an online invitation. It tracks the same rate as the Teahouse invites did.

177:

Given the tumbleweeds response from your last poke of the community, I think you'd be welcome to spam every new editor without limit, if that took your fancy.

2268:

notice/appreciate the problem - you need experienced editors. I think that was demonstrated with your attempt to validate your data using the Mechanical Turk.

21: 2936: 2539: 2362: 3342:

How's it different to adding births in decade categories - which you appear to have no issue with - from a policy perspective? You've not explained

2997:

At this point, it's water under the bridge. If you had proposed 3,000 edits instead of 30, I would have more sympathy toward your disappointment. –

1428: 3674: 2040: 2963:

While I agree a BRFA might be overkill for ~30 edits, and I'm glad the typos were fixed, I'm a bit disappointed for the outcome of the request.

395:

The bot uses AWB - I'll ask which version or regular expressions it uses. I've added plain-English examples of the matches, as you requested.

3567: 2349:- An already low resolution file pointlessly resized from 275 × 396 to 263 × 378. Note the source file itself was previously manually reduced. 2504:

The tag is correct, it was a file that needed reduction. Needing reduction and "needing reduction to 0.1 megapixels" are different things. -

2543: 2423: 285: 241: 3740:

Understandable. "Tasks" is also a bit unclear since it implies a general list rather than the specific approval. Maybe we can tweak that. —

3189:

of a pre-existing category), and an error they won't recognize nor act upon. For this unwillingness, please remove the bot's permission. --

2339: 2204: 2208: 2487:

sure that if a larger image is needed, to justify it in the rationale. No rationale for the larger image, then it needs to be resized. --

3677:″, ″Denied requests″ and ″Expired/withdrawn requests″ it's better to have links to requests pages, not (only) to bot account userlinks ( 2392: 2388: 3273:

guideline, but it's not what the bot policy's intended to protect against. If a recategorisation into years wasn't intended, why was a

3253:

I see nothing wrong with that edit. Both categories are clearly implied by the now-deleted combined category that was being replaced.

1458:

I have a question regarding renewing an approval for a bot which we got in 2011. The archival discussion about the bot is posted at:

1116: 2117:

is scheduled for 2015-02-09 22:48:52. That would be yesterday. Is it stuck in a loop, or waiting for something that's down? Thanks,

1855: 3163:

a category like "1 BC" to the same biographical article that never has been in a "year" category (which would not be conforming to

1613: 3762: 2132:

It's apparently stuck on something. I'll restart it in a little bit, but first I'm going to try to figure out what it's stuck on.

1938:

As this is a significant change that may need community input please just make a second bot request, same as if you were adding a

1427:

P.S. I would be happy to focus my attention to other bot tasks if they would be considered. I have been waiting for a response to

3091:

Enough wikilawyering. The edits were obviously correctly implementing the consensus at CfD, and are well within the bot's scope.

545:

Not sure I understand your confused editor scenario. My proposal is that if a page has citations with ref=harv (and therefore a

271: 3291:

I don't say the blame is "squarely on the bot operator" (I have asked the closer of the CfD discussion to review their closure

2951: 2778:. Instead of reducing images to 0.1MP and ignoring close cases, it should just reduce to 0.15MP. Bots cannot make any of the 2713: 2650: 2445: 2372: 1970: 1924: 346:

Correction, I would want to skip all pages that contain a template that starts with "sfn" or "harv", including those listed at

2599: 1878: 3376:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

3111:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1174: 3556:

How does one find out if an editor is running an approved bot or has permission to run a bot? I ask because the edits of

3383:

Can I reopen? A comment was added after closure of the discussion, and I'd like to reply to it without changing venue. --

2787:

and notify the tagger. I'd be fine with 0.2MP too, or reducing to 0.15MP only those files which are larger than 0.2MP. -

2328: 2319: 3907:

I was recently redirecting subpages of various talk pages, and this query from four years ago hasn't been answered yet:

1767: 1591: 1578:

Am not running the bot myself. Just involved with its development. Will write more details and apply in full when home.

1549: 1379:." The version of the bot's code that was posted before the bot approval clearly showed that the bot would be editing 2779: 2595: 2552: 1974: 1928: 4090:

Thank you both - maybe we need a banner - Hey BAG guys, if you don't work this page the whole thing will ASPLODE! —

3127:

User talk:Armbrust#Problem at Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2015 May 25#1st to 5th century BC births

556:

why it doesn't edit pages with ref=harv), and answer any questions that the confused editor asked on my talk page.

4112: 4096: 4070: 4054: 4038: 4009: 3986: 3957: 3896: 3873: 3839: 3826: 3808: 3792: 3779: 3746: 3735: 3715: 3696: 3660: 3633: 3608: 3591: 3578: 3561: 3541: 3520: 3506: 3494: 3468: 3451: 3438: 3404: 3392: 3388: 3355: 3337: 3321: 3317: 3286: 3260: 3248: 3244: 3210: 3198: 3194: 3176: 3172: 3154: 3138: 3134: 3075: 3053: 3029: 3006: 2985: 2919: 2894: 2861: 2836: 2799: 2753: 2731: 2614: 2589: 2571: 2533: 2516: 2499: 2481: 2463: 2378: 2355:- An already low resolution file pointlessly resized from 278 × 440 to 251 × 397. This file is actually free-use ( 2301: 2282: 2261: 2171: 2139: 2126: 2084: 2061: 2050: 2026: 2001: 1978: 1948: 1932: 1887: 1870: 1825: 1809: 1786: 1749: 1710: 1698: 1686: 1654: 1599: 1573: 1557: 1517: 1506: 1484: 1473: 1440: 1422: 1376: 1359: 1331: 1289: 1271: 1238: 1216: 1186: 1094: 1062: 1050: 1026: 614: 565: 533: 500: 461: 432: 404: 390: 359: 341: 298: 275: 257: 223: 216: 199: 181: 172: 154: 42: 3525:

It also shouldn't be any part of (or remotely confused to be part of) any official process (in direct contrast to

1533: 3915: 3418: 2685: 2680:

Also maybe it would make sense for the bot to skip items which would be reduced by less than 50%. All the best:

1909:

Should I start a new bot request approval? Or what is the proper process for expanding the scope of a bots work?

1782: 1745: 128: 2430:, tagging it would be a mistake - because you're left with a resulting file so small as to fail its rationale. 3979: 3866: 2821: 2810: 2672: 2665: 2658: 2418: 2019: 1643:

If we go that route, a simple tweak to this page's lead to "you must first get it approved, except as noted at

1616:, but I'm moving it to this page, since this is the more appropriate venue for this portion of the discussion. 1595: 1553: 1532:. We are planning on running it on a few edits. It makes no changes to main space but just puts the results at 1644: 1628: 3326:

It's not even clear to me that the policy you link applies: depending on what is meant by "person category",

2406: 4104: 4062: 4046: 3968: 2346: 2039:

exists only as a short notice of adminbot requests while the actual transclusion and approvals process uses

1884: 1055:

Actually, it was a problem with the database on Tool Labs. It just required a restart after that was fixed.

3688: 3557: 3309: 3122: 2928: 2106: 2008: 1676: 1002: 3967:

Hello, I'm seeking a volunteer to verify if 22 edits made by my bot look OK to you. The list can be found

3230: 3069: 3049: 3023: 2979: 2646: 2369:), but you can't revert it, because previous versions have been deleted. No one is reviewing bot uploads. 2249:. This is harder than all the other issues and we have not been able to find a befitting solution for it. 1319: 589: 1737: 1691:

That's fine too. The very first sentence there makes is clear when approval is needed and when it's not.

1375:

Note that the bot task stated: "Fix incorrect date formats in citation templates to remove articles from

1160: 51: 17: 3624: 3384: 3313: 3240: 3226: 3190: 3168: 3130: 2817: 2396: 2279: 2174:. We can work further on blacklisting certain types of links based on inputs from experienced editors. 1357: 1305: 938: 599: 572: 322:

remove the "chaff" without breaking anything. For example, I would want to skip all pages that contain

178: 3041: 2968: 2874: 2402: 1529: 3941: 2682: 2382: 2193: 1778: 1741: 1436: 1418: 1212: 561: 428: 421: 400: 355: 337: 268: 3798: 1661: 311:

While I haven't seen any examples of where any of the bot's edits actually broke any citations with

142: 3972: 3892: 3859: 3417:

Sick of filling out forms in wikitext, I made a DRN-style form that you can test out by installing

3002: 2293: 2253: 2012: 1966: 1920: 1177:) is refusing to publish how to opt out, even though the BRFA was approved as exclusion compliant. 1046: 3476: 1665: 4085: 3724: 3485:

a button to the WP:BRFA header that uses the script I wrote. Feel free to revert it if you want.

3347: 3278: 3146: 3126: 2297: 2257: 2246: 1277: 579: 214: 1081: 575:

and at the pages for the templates where articles by staff are most likely to come up, probably

244:

BattyBot24 does not have consensus and is breaking working citations. I propose the approval of

2214:

Yet another concern is the context in which the anchor appears. For example, we wanted to link

4034: 3953: 3822: 3775: 3681: 3615:

As a general rule, if a bot has approval to run, the specifically allowed tasks will be under

3516: 3490: 3464: 3434: 3064: 3059: 3045: 3037: 3018: 2974: 2964: 2642: 2399:

process. Pointlessly reduced to further muddy, lower resolution and introduce more artifacts.

2122: 2080: 1866: 1851: 1407: 1396: 1383: 1312: 1285: 1234: 1182: 1168: 1156: 1105: 1022: 3833:"citations" go, your edits should incorporate a citation to the actual source of the data. — 3426: 2381:- This has been reduced, and thus re-encoded 3 times. Give it a few years and it'll just be 3855: 3805: 3588: 3575: 3503: 3401: 3351: 3334: 3282: 3257: 3207: 3150: 3095: 2366: 2356: 2154: 2136: 2047: 1764: 1707: 1694: 1683: 1650: 1587: 1545: 1503: 1469: 1348: 1327: 1059: 610: 529: 496: 457: 386: 294: 253: 192: 163: 3880: 3530: 3343: 3270: 3164: 1308:). The rules for date format are described there. But the bot is also being used to change 1254: 188: 119: 3937: 3787: 3766: 3741: 3710: 3655: 3628: 2943: 2911: 2886: 2853: 2828: 2791: 2745: 2727: 2705: 2606: 2585: 2563: 2529: 2508: 2495: 2473: 2459: 2437: 2276: 1432: 1414: 1275: 1223: 1208: 1087: 557: 424: 396: 351: 333: 265: 3763:

https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_countries_by_percentage_of_population_living_in_poverty

3062:

had you written this explanation straight in the BRFA, it would have been perfect ;-) --

3885: 3327: 3305: 3222: 2998: 2272: 2225:

However it is hard to understand the context of the sentence for example the fact that

1958: 1912: 1514: 1481: 1431:

since April 13, and am waiting to submit other request until after #28 is considered.

1039: 4091: 4015: 4004: 3834: 3604: 3570:) seem to be suspiciously bot-like, but I can't tell if this is authorized or not. -- 3456: 3447: 2948: 2940: 2916: 2908: 2891: 2883: 2858: 2850: 2833: 2825: 2796: 2788: 2775:. Masem suggests that the tag should only be used for images "far outside the range" 2750: 2742: 2710: 2702: 2611: 2603: 2568: 2560: 2513: 2505: 2478: 2470: 2442: 2434: 2234: 2056: 1996: 1954: 1943: 1820: 1729:. I did the first few in the edit window, and then switched to AWB to do the others ( 1568: 1269: 1267: 1257:. Once assistance has been rendered, please deactivate this tag by replacing it with 1202: 549: 210: 124: 3638:

Also, going to agree with Rob here that the edits don't strike me as very bot-like.

2880:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing

2785:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing

2395:- Muddy, low resolution with compression artifacts. Images reviewed as part of the 4081: 4030: 3998: 3949: 3818: 3771: 3599: 3512: 3486: 3460: 3430: 2636: 2410: 2271:

As a guide for next steps, you could go down the semi-automated editing route that

2158: 2118: 2076: 1896: 1862: 1847: 1281: 1230: 1194: 1178: 1164: 1018: 347: 326: 315: 1875:

Quick note: I've relisted the BRFA on the main page - you might want to stick the

1620:

According to this page: "If you want to run a bot on the English Knowledge (XXG),

1563:

It's best to have all bots be approved! That being said, your bot may not need a

2181:

This explains why "European" was included in the link text to classical music in

3802: 3641: 3584: 3571: 3500: 3398: 3331: 3254: 3204: 3092: 2556: 2219: 2200:

Another concern was regarding skipping of possible anchors. For example the bot

2133: 2096: 2044: 1761: 1757: 1704: 1680: 1671:

I would support a change of the target of the "approved" link on this page from

1579: 1537: 1500: 1465: 1370: 1340: 1323: 1273: 1056: 992: 606: 540: 525: 492: 453: 382: 290: 249: 196: 169: 151: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1413:

template, then I will be happy to adjust the bot's code accordingly. Thanks!

3651: 3534: 2720: 2578: 2522: 2488: 2452: 1496: 1260: 3511:

And the button should come after the "Before applying for approval" section.

2769:- The bot should resize images to 0.15 megapixels and ignore smaller images. 141:

These editors are pre-selected for having good-faith editor patterns by the

3691:

looks for me more usefull than all simple userlinks from these sections. --

2598:

is tagged, it will get reverted? Do you believe had I not stepped in, that

1736:

Did the series of 45 edits need bot approval? Would 185 edits? The rule at

3425:. Feedback is welcome; eventually, it would be nice if we had a button on 1795:

Need bot approval for running pywikibot scripts on English Knowledge (XXG)

191:

about the plan to increase the invite rates. Thanks for your input again

3731: 3730:

on first postion is ″talk″, here is "tasks") and didn't checked link:( --

3704: 3692: 3709:

The first link after the bot name, "tasks", goes to the request page. —

1304:

be reconsidered. The description of the bot only mentions CS1 (which is

2849:

This gives time for manual reduction or tag removal by the uploader. -

2242: 2153:

I see a serious lapse from my side. I missed to respond to comments by

3903:

From the archive (formerly Update these instructions w.r.t. AnomieBOT)

743:\d*(\s| )(second|minute|hour|hr|day|week|wk|month|mo|year)s?(\s| )ago? 3181:

So there is no "human error" involved apart from the bot operator's (

1840:

was declined due to inactivity. Since I have returned (mwahaha) and

3623:, it'll (probably) have the bot user right, which you can check at 1883:

template on it if you don't hear anything within a couple of days.

2427: 2230: 3617:

Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Username

3529:

that could easily be confused as part of the official process).

2929:

Knowledge (XXG):Bot_policy#Appeals_and_reexamination_of_approvals

2207:

and instead pipe link Harvard to Harvard University. However the

3269:

That's not a violation of policy, either; it is contrary to the

2655:

It might be worth giving the template a size parameter or two.

1159:

requesting that those instructions be added to the userpage per

1077:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/CLT20RecordsUpdateBot

3720:

True. Sorry, my bad. I have misread and ignored that label (in

1725:

I've made a series of 45 edits to take certain articles out of

1460:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests_for_approval/InstructorCommentBot

941:- these are the new rules that prompted the recent discussion: 123:

have played through the game entirely yielding a very positive

2333:

Category:Knowledge (XXG) non-free file size reduction requests

1846:

for running the bot on Labs, can the bot request be approved?

1775:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/John of Reading Bot

286:

Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 86#Question about bot edits

242:

Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 86#Question about bot edits

29: 4019:(not sure why I was fingered as the one who broke everything 3911:

Part III seems somewhat dated. In particular, after you add

3879:

If you want to bring up concerns about bots, here or usually

2871:- Bots (and taggers) should ignore previously reduced files. 2011:

every day just to look for the few Adminbot requests a year.

2312:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Theo's Little Bot

1631:: "Operators may carry out limited testing of bot processes 2318:

How does one judge the "low resolution" requirement of our

2105:, the Bot Administrators' Group bot, BAGbot, which updates 1861:

I have reopened the request, so responses should go there.

1345:

WL doesn't work, so it's not possible to locate the RfC. --

1001:, the Bot Administrators' Group bot, BAGbot, which updates 2846:- Once tagged, the bot does not reduce images for a week. 2148:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests_for_approval/StanfordLinkBot

1727:

Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls

2375:- Correctly reduced once. Pointlessly bot reduced again. 1832:

Review of expired request for APersonBot's second request

1817:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/RahmanuddinBot

1567:, and should have no trouble getting a trial approved. — 672:

Meld je aan of registreer je om een reactie te plaatsen!

2233:, which is actually a dairy products factory instead of 2102: 998: 933:

Comment out variations of "Staff" per the suggestion in

168:

just wanted to loop you in to this discussion. Cheers,

3929:

to move the record to the 'trial complete' section, but

3767:

https://github.com/utilitarianexe/wiki_poverty_list_bot

3647: 3526: 3481: 3292: 3237: 3215: 3203:

Please provide links to diffs of actual problem edits.

2776: 2773: 2277:

http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/view/Dab_solver

2238: 2226: 2215: 2201: 2189: 2182: 1842: 1730: 1429:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approvals#BattyBot 28

1146: 1138: 1130: 1122: 1035: 1033: 131:. Technically and functionally it's all looking good. 2055:

OK You two have already convinced me :D Withdrawn. —

1528:

We have build a copy and paste detection bot based on

1253:

A user has requested the attention of a member of the

452:

Thanks, I think I have the book for that on my shelf.

4043:*cough*I think I may now what the cause is. *cough*.— 1995:? Don't see any use of it having its own subpage. — 858:

parameter, but leave other information in the field:

3602:

that indicates sleep all point in that direction. ~

2542:

which in actuality is a free-use file. The resized

2037:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Adminbots

1993:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Adminbots

3583:

P.S.: I'm also going to ask at the Village Pump. --

3016:

English Knowledge (XXG) fails in regard to this. --

1673:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Approved

1647:" or something along those lines would do the job. 3799:blindly hitting "save page" on the script's output 3185:unallowed categories that are not the result of a 3040:you can always request an alternative account per 2816:While savvy users may watchlist their images like 2697:Note that the erroneously tagged as non-free file 882:(at )?\d\d?:\d{2}( |\s)?(\.?m\.?,?)?(\s(?|GM)T)?,? 2329:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free_content#Image_resolution 693:Up for Discussion(Post Comment|\sJump to Forums)? 2699:File:All Men Are Mortal, 1946 French edition.jpg 2353:File:All Men Are Mortal, 1946 French edition.jpg 1100:Operator refuses to publish opt-out instructions 3089: 2904:- Admins to actually review the resized files. 2772:Rich suggests ignoring images larger than 0.2MP 782:The writer has posted comments on this article 1017:scheduled. Does this require human attention? 778:The writer has posted comments on this article 1075:Please can anyone reopen the BRFA request at 792:The Critic has posted comments on this Movie 236:Propose revocation of approval of BattyBot 24 8: 788:The Critic has posted comments on this Movie 3429:that went straight to the request subpage. 3397:No. Take discussion elsewhere if you want. 2719:the behavior to discourage, not the bot. -- 2469:ignored, or has never been put in place. - 1677:Knowledge (XXG):Bot policy#Approval process 2041:Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval 1598:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 1556:) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 2540:File:Slacker-logo-black-official-2015.png 2363:File:Slacker-logo-black-official-2015.png 677:Meld je nu aan om een reactie te posten. 204:The invite-expansion-Pump-post-update is 3129:. Please revoke the bot's permission. -- 931: 852: 639: 1013:@ 2014-01-23 18:48:19, and there is no 3761:I am writing a program to auto update 3310:WP:Bot policy#Categorization of people 3123:WP:Bot policy#Categorization of people 855: 687:Log nu in om een reactie te plaatsen. 642: 422:.NET Framework 3.5 Regular Expressions 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3423:WP:Bots/Requests for approval/request 2544:File:Dear Esther Screenshot Large.jpg 2424:File:Dear Esther Screenshot Large.jpg 2331:. And if it is greater, and it's in 2275:went down in solving disambiguation: 1612:This issue was originally brought up 7: 4020: 3105:The following discussion is closed. 3011:"Manual" means I would have checked 2205:Harvard Graduate School of Education 1838:BRFA for APersonBot's second request 1322:which began less than 24 hours ago. 110:HostBot 4, increase from 100 invites 3121:seems to be unwilling to comply to 2393:File:Drakengard2aerial gameplay.jpg 2389:File:Drakengard2ground gameplay.jpg 1679:, but that's as far as I would go. 838:\*?Please enter your (user)?name\.? 682:Log in om een reactie te plaatsen. 3932:AnomieBOT does this automatically. 2809:- Uploaders must be notified when 2365:- This file is actually free-use ( 2309: 1392:I believe your main issue is that 28: 3817:Maybe post on my wiki user page. 3372:The discussion above is closed. 707:Up for Discussion Jump to Forums 585:and, because it is a redirect of 4021: 2320:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 1703:I went ahead and did that then. 1247: 955:(?:Newsarama )?Staff(?: writer)? 723:Post to(\:|\sFacebook|\sTwitter) 33: 3619:. If a bot has approval to run 2373:File:Endless Legend Box art.jpg 1157:User_talk:A930913#Reference_bot 3971:. Thanks for any feedback. -- 3757:Looking for advise/Is it a bot 3542:05:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC) 3521:01:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC) 3507:01:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC) 3495:02:15, 24 September 2015 (UTC) 3469:21:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 3452:06:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 3439:23:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC) 3308:by bot is against bot policy ( 2691:18:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC). 2600:File:Starcommand2013battle.jpg 2070:Archives sorted and cleaned up 1991:Any objections to deprecating 1831: 1622:you must first get it approved 702:Up for DiscussionPost Comment 1: 3944:) 15:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 3897:16:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC) 3874:16:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC) 2920:11:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 2895:11:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 2862:11:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 2837:11:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 2800:11:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 2754:11:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 2732:20:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC) 2714:20:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC) 2651:22:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 2615:16:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 2590:15:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 2572:11:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 2534:00:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 2517:23:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 2500:23:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 2482:23:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 2464:22:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 2446:21:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 2140:14:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC) 2127:01:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC) 2085:01:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC) 2043:just like any other request. 1979:19:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 1949:17:56, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 1933:17:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 1888:10:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC) 1871:01:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC) 1856:19:34, 28 November 2014 (UTC) 1826:00:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC) 1810:22:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC) 1095:10:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 1071:Reopen an expired bot request 939:Help:Citation Style 1#Authors 224:19:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 200:22:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 182:22:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 173:22:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 155:17:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 3840:03:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC) 3827:02:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC) 3809:13:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 3793:00:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 3780:00:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 3747:18:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 3736:18:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 3716:17:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 3697:17:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 3236:Afaics all today's edits at 2555:is used in featured article 2031:There's nothing to actually 1787:08:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC) 1750:21:49, 27 October 2014 (UTC) 1721:When is bot approval needed? 1711:00:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC) 1699:20:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC) 1687:15:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC) 1655:17:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC) 1524:Copy and paste detection bot 1063:23:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 1051:14:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 1027:14:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 847:Please enter your username. 3661:15:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 3634:15:19, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 3609:09:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 3592:09:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 3579:09:04, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 3552:Bot operator approval list? 3225:(besides the unproblematic 3098:21:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 2596:File:Warlugulong - Zoom.png 2553:File:Warlugulong - Zoom.png 2310:Request for re-examination 2209:manual of style for linking 2146:Request for re-examination 2062:13:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 2051:12:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 2027:05:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 2002:03:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 1600:07:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 1574:15:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC) 1558:14:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC) 1032:Might have been my "fault" 645:parameter when it contains 615:16:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 566:04:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 534:03:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 501:18:41, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 462:00:39, 4 January 2014 (UTC) 433:20:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 405:02:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 391:18:15, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 360:18:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 342:22:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 299:19:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 276:18:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 258:14:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 208:, for future reference. - 4131: 4113:02:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 4097:02:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 4071:02:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 4055:02:04, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 4039:01:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC) 4010:21:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 3987:18:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC) 3765:using the world bank api. 3673:In last 3 sections named ″ 3405:21:41, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3393:21:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3356:21:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3338:21:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3322:21:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3287:21:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3261:21:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3249:21:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3211:20:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3199:20:55, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3177:20:48, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3155:20:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3139:20:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 2813:is tagged to their image. 2594:Are you confident that if 2379:File:Fantastic Four 48.jpg 2359:), so you could revert it. 2302:04:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 2283:21:59, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 2262:17:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC) 2172:Category:Featured articles 2107:Knowledge (XXG):BAG/Status 1377:Category:CS1 errors: dates 1290:17:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 1239:00:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 1217:21:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC) 1187:18:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 1003:Knowledge (XXG):BAG/Status 284:In the first paragraph of 3958:04:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC) 3419:User:APerson/easy-brfa.js 3239:have the same problem. -- 2882:and notify the tagger. - 2342:shows examples such as - 1518:14:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 1507:05:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 1491:Resurrecting DeltaQuadBot 953: 915: 900: 880: 854:Remove prefixes from the 836: 761: 741: 721: 691: 661: 524:ref=harv are left alone. 120:Knowledge (XXG) Adventure 118:, we started running 100 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots 3374:Please do not modify it. 3108:Please do not modify it. 2952:01:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 2939:that the bot enables. - 2822:File:Dredd2012Poster.jpg 2811:Template:Non-free reduce 2419:Template:Non-free reduce 2090:BAGbot seems to be stuck 1760:22:13, 27 October 2014 ( 1485:08:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 1474:13:49, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 1263:|BAG assistance needed}} 937:and the instructions in 842:*Please enter your name 3145:result of human error. 3076:13:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC) 3054:11:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC) 3030:10:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC) 3007:19:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC) 2986:19:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC) 2347:File:Drchaos boxart.jpg 2245:was linked, instead of 1441:23:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 1423:23:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 1360:03:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 1332:03:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 1302:approval of BattyBot 25 667:now to post a comment! 3963:Edit verification help 3946: 3925:The instructions tell 3413:Adding a form for BRFA 3231:Category:10s BC births 3100: 2407:User:Theo's Little Bot 1334:, link fixed 4:03 UT. 1199:Have you tried adding 636:Find and replace rules 3909: 3687:). First column from 3625:Special:ListUsers/bot 3330:may not even be one. 3227:Category:15 BC births 2818:User:Darkwarriorblake 1879:BAG assistance needed 1306:Help:Citation Style 1 573:Help:Citation Style 1 263:Thought it was 26? -- 46:of past discussions. 22:Requests for approval 2194:Aromatic hydrocarbon 1815:Your prior request, 1207:to your talk page? 1205:|deny=ReferenceBot}} 949:Examples of matches 866:Examples of matches 657:Examples of matches 2338:A look through the 1255:Bot Approvals Group 942: 859: 650: 3650:are reasonable if 3421:and then going to 3233:recategorization). 3218:– problematically 2247:Protein (nutrient) 2113:"running" and the 1885:Reticulated Spline 1843:there is consensus 932: 853: 713:Name\s\(required\) 697:Up for Discussion 641:Remove the entire 640: 240:The discussion at 116:HostBot 4 approval 4111: 4069: 4053: 4028: 3895: 3675:Approved requests 3540: 2875:File:Thor-272.jpg 2692: 2403:File:Thor-272.jpg 1802:Rahmanuddin Shaik 1356: 1049: 1009:"error" from its 983: 982: 930: 929: 917:Written by\:?( )? 851: 850: 732:Post to Facebook 104: 103: 58: 57: 52:current talk page 4122: 4107: 4102: 4094: 4089: 4065: 4060: 4049: 4044: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4018: 4007: 4002: 3984: 3977: 3927:the bot operator 3920: 3916:BotTrialComplete 3914: 3888: 3884: 3871: 3864: 3856:User:Cyberbot_II 3837: 3790: 3744: 3729: 3723: 3713: 3708: 3686: 3680: 3658: 3645: 3631: 3558:Srednuas Lenoroc 3539: 3537: 3484: 3385:Francis Schonken 3314:Francis Schonken 3241:Francis Schonken 3191:Francis Schonken 3187:recategorization 3169:Francis Schonken 3131:Francis Schonken 3117:The operator of 3110: 3074: 3072: 3067: 3028: 3026: 3021: 2984: 2982: 2977: 2946: 2914: 2889: 2856: 2831: 2794: 2780:value judgements 2748: 2724: 2708: 2690: 2676: 2669: 2662: 2640: 2609: 2582: 2566: 2526: 2511: 2492: 2476: 2456: 2440: 2367:Template:PD-text 2357:Template:PD-text 2103:AnomieBOT status 2100: 2059: 2022: 1999: 1963: 1946: 1917: 1882: 1845: 1823: 1773:Here goes then: 1697: 1653: 1633:without approval 1584: 1571: 1566: 1542: 1534:WP:MED/Copyright 1412: 1406: 1401: 1395: 1388: 1382: 1374: 1355: 1352: 1346: 1344: 1317: 1311: 1264: 1251: 1250: 1227: 1206: 1198: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1141: 1133: 1125: 1093: 1090: 1084: 1042: 1038: 999:AnomieBOT status 996: 976: 959:Newsarama staff 956: 943: 918: 903: 883: 873: 860: 857: 839: 829: 819: 809: 799: 789: 779: 764: 744: 737:Post to Twitter 724: 717:Name (required) 714: 694: 664: 651: 644: 604: 598: 594: 588: 584: 578: 554: 548: 544: 331: 325: 320: 314: 221: 167: 125:Learning pathway 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 4130: 4129: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4110: 4109::Limited Access 4105: 4092: 4079: 4068: 4067::Limited Access 4063: 4052: 4051::Limited Access 4047: 4022: 4005: 3996: 3994: 3980: 3973: 3965: 3918: 3912: 3905: 3886: 3867: 3860: 3848: 3835: 3788: 3759: 3742: 3727: 3721: 3711: 3702: 3684: 3678: 3671: 3656: 3639: 3629: 3554: 3535: 3480: 3415: 3380: 3106: 3101: 3086: 3070: 3065: 3063: 3024: 3019: 3017: 2980: 2975: 2973: 2961: 2944: 2933:this discussion 2912: 2887: 2854: 2829: 2792: 2746: 2722: 2706: 2673:Non-free reduce 2670: 2666:Non-free reduce 2663: 2659:Non-free reduce 2656: 2634: 2607: 2580: 2564: 2524: 2509: 2490: 2474: 2454: 2438: 2316: 2202:chose to bypass 2197:them as well. 2151: 2094: 2092: 2072: 2057: 2020: 1997: 1989: 1959: 1944: 1913: 1900: 1876: 1841: 1834: 1821: 1797: 1779:John of Reading 1742:John of Reading 1723: 1692: 1648: 1610: 1580: 1569: 1564: 1538: 1526: 1493: 1453: 1410: 1404: 1399: 1393: 1386: 1380: 1368: 1350: 1347: 1338: 1315: 1309: 1298: 1258: 1248: 1221: 1200: 1192: 1147: 1139: 1131: 1123: 1108: 1104: 1102: 1088: 1082: 1080: 1073: 1040: 990: 988: 974: 954: 935:the bot request 916: 901: 881: 871: 837: 827: 817: 807: 797: 787: 777: 763:\d*\s*Comments? 762: 747:47 seconds ago 742: 722: 712: 692: 662: 638: 602: 596: 592: 586: 582: 576: 552: 546: 538: 329: 323: 318: 312: 238: 220: 217: 161: 114:Per the recent 112: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 4128: 4126: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4103: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4061: 4045: 3993: 3990: 3964: 3961: 3948:Any comments? 3934: 3933: 3930: 3904: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3852:dead Links bot 3847: 3846:Dead links bot 3844: 3843: 3842: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3758: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3670: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3612: 3611: 3553: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3527:APerson's edit 3509: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3414: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3379: 3378: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3340: 3328:Category:15 BC 3306:Category:15 BC 3299: 3295: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3234: 3223:Category:15 BC 3179: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3088: 3087: 3085: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 2994: 2993: 2960: 2955: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2693: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2415: 2414: 2400: 2386: 2376: 2370: 2360: 2350: 2315: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2286: 2285: 2273:User:Dispenser 2269: 2150: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2091: 2088: 2071: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2029: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1899: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1833: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1796: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1722: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1669: 1645:WP:BOTAPPROVAL 1637: 1636: 1629:WP:BOTAPPROVAL 1625: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1452: 1451:renewing a bot 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1390: 1363: 1362: 1300:I request the 1297: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1101: 1098: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 987: 984: 981: 980: 977: 971: 970: 966: 965: 961: 960: 957: 951: 950: 947: 928: 927: 923: 922: 919: 913: 912: 908: 907: 904: 902:Review(ed)? by 898: 897: 893: 892: 888: 887: 884: 878: 877: 874: 868: 867: 864: 849: 848: 844: 843: 840: 834: 833: 830: 824: 823: 820: 814: 813: 810: 804: 803: 800: 794: 793: 790: 784: 783: 780: 774: 773: 769: 768: 765: 759: 758: 754: 753: 749: 748: 745: 739: 738: 734: 733: 729: 728: 725: 719: 718: 715: 709: 708: 704: 703: 699: 698: 695: 689: 688: 684: 683: 679: 678: 674: 673: 669: 668: 665: 659: 658: 655: 637: 634: 632: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 304: 303: 302: 301: 279: 278: 237: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 226: 218: 111: 108: 106: 102: 101: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4127: 4114: 4108: 4101:YES PLEASE!!— 4100: 4099: 4098: 4095: 4087: 4086:Cyberpower678 4083: 4078: 4072: 4066: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4050: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4017: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4008: 4000: 3991: 3989: 3988: 3985: 3983: 3978: 3976: 3970: 3962: 3960: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3945: 3943: 3939: 3931: 3928: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3917: 3908: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3882: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3872: 3870: 3865: 3863: 3857: 3853: 3845: 3841: 3838: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3810: 3807: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3791: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3768: 3764: 3756: 3748: 3745: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3733: 3726: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3714: 3706: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3683: 3676: 3668: 3662: 3659: 3653: 3649: 3643: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3632: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3613: 3610: 3607: 3606: 3601: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3590: 3586: 3581: 3580: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3566: 3563: 3559: 3551: 3543: 3538: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3508: 3505: 3502: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3483: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3449: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3412: 3406: 3403: 3400: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3381: 3377: 3375: 3370: 3369: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3339: 3336: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3293: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3262: 3259: 3256: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3235: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3221: 3217: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3209: 3206: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3119:ArmbrustBot 4 3112: 3109: 3103: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3094: 3084: 3083:ArmbrustBot 4 3081: 3077: 3073: 3068: 3061: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3031: 3027: 3022: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2995: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2983: 2978: 2970: 2966: 2959: 2956: 2954: 2953: 2950: 2947: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2927:According to 2921: 2918: 2915: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2903: 2900: 2896: 2893: 2890: 2885: 2881: 2876: 2873: 2872: 2870: 2867: 2863: 2860: 2857: 2852: 2848: 2847: 2845: 2842: 2838: 2835: 2832: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2814: 2812: 2808: 2805: 2801: 2798: 2795: 2790: 2786: 2781: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2770: 2768: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2755: 2752: 2749: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2709: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2688: 2687: 2684: 2678: 2674: 2667: 2660: 2653: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2638: 2616: 2613: 2610: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2570: 2567: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2515: 2512: 2507: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2477: 2472: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2444: 2441: 2436: 2431: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2401: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2387: 2384: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2371: 2368: 2364: 2361: 2358: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2341: 2340:bot's uploads 2336: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2321: 2313: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2284: 2281: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2250: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2235:Dairy product 2232: 2228: 2223: 2221: 2217: 2212: 2210: 2206: 2203: 2198: 2195: 2191: 2186: 2184: 2179: 2175: 2173: 2167: 2163: 2160: 2156: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2098: 2089: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2069: 2063: 2060: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2049: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2016: 2015: 2010: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2000: 1994: 1986: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1962: 1956: 1955:User:Xaosflux 1952: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1916: 1910: 1907: 1903: 1898: 1895: 1889: 1886: 1880: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1839: 1827: 1824: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1794: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1769: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1734: 1732: 1728: 1720: 1712: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1685: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1646: 1641: 1634: 1630: 1627:According to 1626: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1615: 1608:Contradiction 1607: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1583: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1541: 1535: 1531: 1523: 1519: 1516: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1490: 1486: 1483: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1461: 1456: 1450: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1409: 1398: 1391: 1385: 1378: 1372: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1354: 1353: 1342: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1314: 1307: 1303: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1276: 1274: 1272: 1270: 1268: 1266: 1262: 1256: 1246: 1245: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1225: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1204: 1196: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1150: 1145: 1142: 1137: 1134: 1129: 1126: 1121: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1107: 1099: 1097: 1096: 1091: 1085: 1078: 1070: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 994: 986:BAGbot status 985: 978: 973: 972: 969:Staff writer 968: 967: 963: 962: 958: 952: 948: 945: 944: 940: 936: 925: 924: 920: 914: 910: 909: 905: 899: 895: 894: 891:at 14:15 GMT 890: 889: 885: 879: 875: 870: 869: 865: 862: 861: 846: 845: 841: 835: 831: 826: 825: 821: 816: 815: 811: 806: 805: 801: 796: 795: 791: 786: 785: 781: 776: 775: 771: 770: 766: 760: 756: 755: 751: 750: 746: 740: 736: 735: 731: 730: 726: 720: 716: 711: 710: 706: 705: 701: 700: 696: 690: 686: 685: 681: 680: 676: 675: 671: 670: 666: 660: 656: 653: 652: 648: 635: 633: 616: 612: 608: 601: 591: 590:cite magazine 581: 574: 569: 568: 567: 563: 559: 551: 542: 537: 536: 535: 531: 527: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 502: 498: 494: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 463: 459: 455: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 430: 426: 423: 406: 402: 398: 394: 393: 392: 388: 384: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 344: 343: 339: 335: 328: 317: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 300: 296: 292: 287: 283: 282: 281: 280: 277: 274: 273: 270: 267: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 235: 225: 222: 215: 213: 212: 207: 203: 202: 201: 198: 194: 190: 185: 184: 183: 180: 176: 175: 174: 171: 165: 159: 158: 157: 156: 153: 147: 144: 139: 138: 132: 130: 129:final product 126: 121: 117: 109: 107: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3995: 3981: 3974: 3966: 3947: 3935: 3926: 3910: 3906: 3868: 3861: 3849: 3815: 3760: 3672: 3620: 3603: 3582: 3564: 3555: 3482:I have added 3446: 3416: 3373: 3371: 3302: 3274: 3219: 3186: 3182: 3160: 3116: 3107: 3104: 3090: 3060:Magioladitis 3046:Magioladitis 3038:Ricordisamoa 3036: 3012: 2965:Magioladitis 2962: 2926: 2901: 2868: 2843: 2806: 2766: 2762: 2738: 2681: 2679: 2675:|width=256}} 2668:|size=100K}} 2654: 2643:Magioladitis 2633: 2548: 2432: 2416: 2411:User:DASHBot 2397:good article 2337: 2324: 2317: 2251: 2227:soybean edit 2224: 2213: 2199: 2187: 2180: 2176: 2168: 2164: 2152: 2114: 2110: 2093: 2073: 2032: 2017: 2013: 1990: 1960: 1939: 1914: 1911: 1908: 1904: 1901: 1897:User:EranBot 1835: 1798: 1738:WP:BOTASSIST 1735: 1724: 1642: 1638: 1632: 1621: 1611: 1581: 1539: 1527: 1494: 1464: 1457: 1454: 1349: 1299: 1252: 1171: 1161:WP:BOTCONFIG 1143: 1135: 1127: 1119: 1113: 1106:ReferenceBot 1103: 1074: 1014: 1010: 1006: 989: 926:Written by 921:Written by: 911:Reviewed by 896:8:03 AM EST 886:at 12:34 pm 757:2 years ago 646: 631: 600:cite journal 419: 348:Template:Sfn 332:. Thanks! 264: 248:be revoked. 239: 209: 148: 140: 135: 133: 113: 105: 82: 47: 41: 3992:Page is mad 3646:edits like 3301:And indeed 3042:WP:VALIDALT 2969:WP:SPELLBOT 2661:|size=.1M}} 2557:Warlugulong 2280:Josh Parris 2220:Renaissance 2155:Josh Parris 1731:sample edit 1695:RobinHood70 1651:RobinHood70 1530:WP:Turnitin 1296:BattyBot 25 1148:user rights 1124:actions log 802:Post a Job 772:27comments 246:BattyBot 24 193:Josh Parris 179:Josh Parris 164:Josh Parris 40:This is an 3938:Blevintron 3850:Regarding 3689:this table 3652:Time, Inc. 2967:mentioned 2958:SamoaBot 2 2739:compounded 2686:Farmbrough 2549:suggestion 2417:What does 1987:Merge From 1662:WP:SANDBOX 1497:User:TPBot 1433:GoingBatty 1415:GoingBatty 1389:templates. 1224:GoingBatty 1209:GoingBatty 906:Review by 798:Post a Job 767:1 Comment 558:GoingBatty 425:GoingBatty 397:GoingBatty 352:GoingBatty 334:GoingBatty 143:WP:Snuggle 99:Archive 15 94:Archive 14 89:Archive 13 83:Archive 12 77:Archive 11 72:Archive 10 3725:Userlinks 3669:BRFA page 3600:time card 3479:in mind, 3477:WP:SILENT 2999:Jonesey95 2383:artifacts 2325:suggested 2229:links to 1961:Doc James 1957:will do. 1915:Doc James 1666:WP:BOTPOL 1582:Doc James 1540:Doc James 1515:Jarry1250 1499:.--v/r - 1482:Jarry1250 1132:block log 752:3 mo ago 727:Post to: 580:cite news 420:AWB uses 64:Archive 5 4093:xaosflux 4016:Xaosflux 4006:xaosflux 3836:xaosflux 3682:botlinks 3648:this one 3568:contribs 2902:Proposal 2869:Proposal 2844:Proposal 2807:Proposal 2767:Proposal 2677:etc... 2314:, Task 1 2294:Ashwinpp 2254:Ashwinpp 2241:, where 2237:. Or in 2115:next run 2109:, shows 2058:xaosflux 2009:WP:B/RfA 1998:xaosflux 1971:contribs 1945:xaosflux 1940:new task 1925:contribs 1822:xaosflux 1592:contribs 1570:xaosflux 1565:bot flag 1550:contribs 1408:citation 1397:citation 1384:citation 1320:this RFC 1313:Citation 1175:contribs 1155:note at 1140:flag log 1117:contribs 1015:next run 1011:last run 1005:, shows 856:|author= 643:|author= 219:Email Me 150:Cheers, 137:better.) 20:‎ | 4082:APerson 4031:APerson 3999:APerson 3950:APerson 3819:Lonjers 3772:Lonjers 3513:Legoktm 3487:APerson 3461:APerson 3431:APerson 3427:WP:BRFA 3066:Ricordi 3020:Ricordi 2976:Ricordi 2637:MBisanz 2426:was at 2409:fights 2243:Protein 2216:Raphael 2159:Maralia 2119:Wbm1058 2077:Wbm1058 1953:Thanks 1863:APerson 1848:APerson 1800:days.-- 1282:Werieth 1231:Werieth 1195:Werieth 1179:Werieth 1165:A930913 1019:Wbm1058 43:archive 3881:WP:BON 3803:Anomie 3789:Earwig 3743:Earwig 3712:Earwig 3657:Earwig 3642:Calton 3630:Earwig 3621:at all 3585:Calton 3572:Calton 3531:WP:AN3 3501:Anomie 3399:Anomie 3348:Alakzi 3344:WP:COP 3332:Anomie 3303:adding 3279:Alakzi 3275:double 3271:WP:COP 3255:Anomie 3205:Anomie 3183:adding 3165:WP:COP 3147:Alakzi 3125:, see 3093:Anomie 2941:hahnch 2909:hahnch 2884:hahnch 2851:hahnch 2826:hahnch 2789:hahnch 2743:hahnch 2703:hahnch 2604:hahnch 2561:hahnch 2506:hahnch 2471:hahnch 2435:hahnch 2134:Anomie 2111:status 2101:– Per 2097:Anomie 2045:Anomie 2035:here: 1758:ais523 1705:Anomie 1681:Anomie 1466:Rostaf 1455:Hello 1371:Jc3s5h 1341:Jc3s5h 1324:Jc3s5h 1057:Anomie 1007:status 997:– Per 993:Anomie 964:Staff 946:Regex 863:Regex 822:admin 654:Regex 607:Jc3s5h 541:Jc3s5h 526:Jc3s5h 493:Jc3s5h 454:Jc3s5h 383:Jc3s5h 291:Jc3s5h 250:Jc3s5h 197:Ocaasi 189:WP:VPR 170:Ocaasi 152:Ocaasi 4035:talk! 3975:Green 3954:talk! 3889:KNOWZ 3862:Green 3854:(ie. 3536:slakr 3491:talk! 3475:With 3465:talk! 3435:talk! 3071:samoa 3025:samoa 3013:every 2981:samoa 2428:1080p 2239:sugar 2231:Dairy 2183:Cello 2033:merge 1975:email 1929:email 1867:talk! 1852:talk! 1777:. -- 1635:...". 1596:email 1554:email 1083:jfd34 1043:KNOWZ 818:admin 16:< 4106:Chat 4084:and 4064:Chat 4048:Chat 3969:here 3942:talk 3893:TALK 3887:HELL 3823:talk 3776:talk 3627:. — 3589:Talk 3576:Talk 3562:talk 3517:talk 3389:talk 3352:talk 3318:talk 3283:talk 3245:talk 3220:adds 3216:Diff 3195:talk 3173:talk 3151:talk 3135:talk 3050:talk 3003:talk 2937:this 2723:ASEM 2683:Rich 2647:talk 2581:ASEM 2525:ASEM 2491:ASEM 2455:ASEM 2298:talk 2258:talk 2190:edit 2123:talk 2081:talk 2021:Talk 1967:talk 1942:. — 1921:talk 1836:The 1806:talk 1783:talk 1746:talk 1614:here 1588:talk 1546:talk 1470:talk 1437:talk 1419:talk 1351:Ohc 1328:talk 1286:talk 1235:talk 1213:talk 1203:bots 1183:talk 1169:talk 1163:and 1111:BRFA 1089:talk 1047:TALK 1041:HELL 1037:. — 1023:talk 876:By: 832:TNN 812:USA 647:only 611:talk 562:talk 550:harv 530:talk 497:talk 458:talk 429:talk 401:talk 387:talk 356:talk 338:talk 295:talk 272:7754 269:chen 254:talk 211:J-Mo 206:here 160:Hey 127:and 3732:XXN 3705:XXN 3693:XXN 3605:Rob 3457:Rob 3448:Rob 3161:add 2820:at 2641:-- 2551:. 2327:by 2218:to 2192:to 1675:to 975:\\] 872:By: 828:TNN 808:USA 350:. 327:sfn 316:sfn 4037:) 3956:) 3921:: 3919:}} 3913:{{ 3825:) 3801:. 3778:) 3734:, 3728:}} 3722:{{ 3695:, 3685:}} 3679:{{ 3587:| 3574:| 3519:) 3493:) 3467:) 3437:) 3391:) 3354:) 3320:) 3285:) 3247:) 3229:→ 3197:) 3175:) 3153:) 3137:) 3052:) 3005:) 2972:-- 2730:) 2689:, 2671:{{ 2664:{{ 2657:{{ 2649:) 2588:) 2532:) 2498:) 2462:) 2405:- 2391:, 2300:) 2260:) 2157:, 2125:) 2083:) 2014:NW 1977:) 1973:· 1969:· 1931:) 1927:· 1923:· 1881:}} 1877:{{ 1869:) 1854:) 1808:) 1785:) 1770:) 1756:-- 1748:) 1693:– 1649:– 1624:." 1594:· 1590:· 1552:· 1548:· 1472:) 1439:) 1421:) 1411:}} 1405:{{ 1400:}} 1394:{{ 1387:}} 1381:{{ 1330:) 1316:}} 1310:{{ 1288:) 1259:{{ 1237:) 1215:) 1201:{{ 1185:) 1025:) 979:] 649:: 613:) 603:}} 597:{{ 595:, 593:}} 587:{{ 583:}} 577:{{ 564:) 553:}} 547:{{ 532:) 499:) 460:) 431:) 403:) 389:) 358:) 340:) 330:}} 324:{{ 319:}} 313:{{ 297:) 266:Rs 256:) 195:! 68:← 4088:: 4080:@ 4033:( 4027:) 4001:: 3997:@ 3982:C 3952:( 3940:( 3891:▎ 3869:C 3821:( 3806:⚔ 3774:( 3707:: 3703:@ 3644:: 3640:@ 3565:· 3560:( 3515:( 3504:⚔ 3489:( 3463:( 3433:( 3402:⚔ 3387:( 3350:( 3335:⚔ 3316:( 3294:) 3281:( 3258:⚔ 3243:( 3208:⚔ 3193:( 3171:( 3149:( 3133:( 3096:⚔ 3048:( 3001:( 2949:n 2945:e 2917:n 2913:e 2892:n 2888:e 2859:n 2855:e 2834:n 2830:e 2797:n 2793:e 2751:n 2747:e 2728:t 2726:( 2721:M 2711:n 2707:e 2645:( 2639:: 2635:@ 2612:n 2608:e 2586:t 2584:( 2579:M 2569:n 2565:e 2530:t 2528:( 2523:M 2514:n 2510:e 2496:t 2494:( 2489:M 2479:n 2475:e 2460:t 2458:( 2453:M 2443:n 2439:e 2413:. 2385:. 2296:( 2256:( 2137:⚔ 2121:( 2099:: 2095:@ 2079:( 2048:⚔ 2024:) 2018:( 1965:( 1919:( 1865:( 1850:( 1804:( 1781:( 1768:C 1765:T 1762:U 1744:( 1708:⚔ 1684:⚔ 1668:. 1586:( 1544:( 1504:P 1501:T 1468:( 1435:( 1417:( 1373:: 1369:@ 1343:: 1339:@ 1326:( 1284:( 1265:. 1261:t 1233:( 1226:: 1222:@ 1211:( 1197:: 1193:@ 1181:( 1172:· 1167:( 1151:) 1144:· 1136:· 1128:· 1120:· 1114:· 1109:( 1092:) 1086:( 1060:⚔ 1045:▎ 1021:( 995:: 991:@ 609:( 560:( 543:: 539:@ 528:( 495:( 456:( 427:( 399:( 385:( 354:( 336:( 293:( 252:( 166:: 162:@ 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.