Knowledge talk:Changing username/Usurpations/Archive 5

973:

think we need to attribute those, no. The account has been inactive for 3 years and it would cause problems were it to edit now. Avraham has signed as Avi for so long that it would probably cause a lot of confusion if someone else edited with that name. On the other hand, we haven't really been allowing the usurpation of accounts that have made good faithed edits to the project. Usurpation is technically feasible, there are some good reasons for it but it would be outside was has been done before. I think I'd need to consult with interested users and other bureaucrats before I made a final decision on that one. If you filed for usurpation I'd probably raise a question on the crat noticeboard and see what the response was come the end of the week when the request was due to be performed.

35: 634: 569: 2677: 1633:, people will be looking for usurption pages and policies on other wikipedias, and looking for interpreters to help them make requests. Could people help by updating the interwiki links for this page, and providing translation help where requested? I'm trying and failing to find the French usurption page. What is the French for "username change" or "usurption"? :-) 1060: 4505: 4293: 2775: 4308: 3080:

well. The problem is that the only handle I ever use on the Internet is already registered here--and, in fact, is banned for being a "sock puppet." Would it be possible to subsume such an account? Or due to the controversial nature of the banning, would it be seen as a somehow dangerous step? Thanks in advance for your help.

1832:). This should, presumably, make the changing username and usurpation processes easier to administer, particularly with regards to whether an account should have its new log "annotated", and whether or not a requesting editor does wish to take a new account, when the previous account holder has a non-empty block log. Regards, 1105:: a fully-established (and, in this case, administrator) account on a sister project, against an established (and, in this case, frequently editing) account on this project. Is it going to be bureaucrat discretion, or is a group going to be set up, or shall the developers handle it? Just throwing some thoughts around... 1359:—note, you can only unify your account whilst logged into an administrator account on a public wiki (that probably means enwiki for a lot of us). Then, follow WJB's advice, above, and you should then be able to log in on other sites, including (I think?) those that you had previously not had an account on. Regards, 1972:), so it won't be a problem for new posts. And having looked at it more carefully I doubt we're going to have too much trouble anyway, as we've never edited the same kind of topics. As long as you don't mind the small chance that someone might attribute some of my previous bad karma to you, then we're probably ok. 2254:? After all, if there's a change of heart later, and it is decided that SUL requests should be moved to a separate archive, it's going to be very difficult identifying in the existing archives, what requests are for SUL and which are ordinary request. Thoughts (especially from bureaucrats, if any are available)? 2608:) as a doppleganger account. I often go by just "katr" and it would be nice to have the username associated with me so there is no confusion. I've attracted some imposters lately, hence the concern. At some point I may opt to move my account to the potential doppleganger account, but not right now. Thanks! 4065:

I see, you understood my point, OK. But I also said, that I have already tried to reach the two remaining sister projects, and that I have a problem with rachnig these: The interwiki does not exist for :ja: version, even more, I have no idea, how to get to the proper wikimedia "change username" page,

3801:

has been dormant for years, and I have redirected the user and talk pages to the corresponding User:Avraham ones. However, for security purposes, I would like to usurp the account and ensure that it cannot be password hacked and then used to impersonate me. I'd rather get a feel here as to whether or

2435:

an article? I realise that this isn't exactly a new discussion but since the process has been expanded wouldn't it be worth opening up the discussion to the community to formalise any new standards? From above I realise that there have been discussions in the past but I can't seem to find any kind of

1097:

I'm probably raising a discussion here that has been exhausted elsewhere (although I cannot find any record of one at the moment), but are there any thoughts on how we are (vaguely) going to handle the implementation of Single User Login, which is due out quite soon? I suspect we cannot stumble along

3768:

No, the edits are not mine, and there is no one who could have edited on my account or anything similar to that. What does this mean? It's not much an issue now, but I was thinking that it could be misleading. We don't have to act on it; just was wondering if there was an explanation for this set

1564:

I checked the account didnt have any edits and all that but after I posted the usurpation request on the talk page I realised somebody already had posted an usurpation request. Does that mean I have to withdraw? The old one is over half a year old and the person isnt on your list anymore. They must

1419:

As Tim4christ17 mentions, GFDL attribution is a very important concern -- our content is licensed on the basis that we'll attribute these people as authors based on the name they've provided while editing. In the case of old and forgotten accounts with no edits, or no GFDL-significant contribs, I'm

1288:

I don't think we need a group to actually rule on the requests; the bureaucrats were promoted for their discretion and judgment. I think it would be a good idea, however, to post this to the wider community and see what they think. The bureaucrats can take whatever the outcome of that discussion is

972:

Ouch, difficult one. Those are good faithed edits (I assume they're valid links), but it would be rather difficult to assert that one has copyright in the addition of an external link - there's no creative process you see, just the copying of a string of words that already exist. So legally I don't

280:

In the past, requests have been granted to users who don't normally qualify for usurpation when they are unifying names cross-project. I suggest creating a placeholder account here, and then making the request, noting that this is what you're doing. Whether or not it will be done, however, is up to

153:

As a rule, the account must have no edits. However, when the edits were quickly reverted vandalism, or to one's own userspace, the usurpation is sometimes carried out. In this scenario, I do not believe this would be permitted, as the user has made contributions to the mainspace. If you can get the

2490:

but immediately forgot about it and made no edits under it. Later I became re-interested in Knowledge and set up this account, but I feel that the previous one is better now. Should I go through the same process here and just log in the account and say 'I agree to be usurped' or something? Thanks,

405:

To be pedantic, if you have the name SKYNET in all capital letters, then you could be renamed to that, because SKYNET is not an existent account, while Skynet is. However, whether or not you would be allowed to be renamed to an account name that is only different in the capitalization is iffy. The

256:

has been inactive since he created his account on the 26 of March 2007. He has no edits, blocks or logs (none that i can find, except "New user account"). I would like to usurp this user account. I don't have a username on en.wikipedia.org, but i have the username Kagee (and contributions) on both

200:

If you wish to usurp a username, first you have to have a user account (as you are editing anonymously), however before creating an account or requesting usurpation, there maybe another name which is not registered, but which you like more — so maybe you could use that. However, usurpation is used

3472:

Is it possible to usurp an account that has edits, but never contributed any content? Such as accounts that only reverted vandalism, did some formatting or fixed typos? And what about accounts with good faith deleted contributions, that might in theory be restored? Note that I don't want to usurp

3079:

Hello. I started getting interested in making an account on Knowledge a couple of months back, when randomly something popped up on my screen about how I need to stop "making malicious edits" to one thing or another; since I have not done that, I figured this IP-only thing was not working out so

2953:

Hey, I have a quick question about the usurp template. Why doesn't it have a reason field? I don't understand what makes it so different from CHU that a reason field is omitted. It's basically a regular rename where the new account already exists, so why no reason field? I noticed this when I was

1924:

Other than doing it yourself, there is no way to change your old sigs. I think there are some bots that can search the entire Knowledge for all instances of "Eve Hall|Eve" and change it, but I've never gotten into bots myself so I don't know which one(s) to recommend or how to use them. Also, I

1908:

I'm not getting territorial, I'm just not sure what the etiquette is in this situation. I'll leave a note for Dutch Eve letting her know I've posted this here, but what is the best way to sort this out? If the usurpation goes ahead, is there a way to change my sig on all my old posts so Dutch Eve

1900:

has put in an usurpation request for the name 'Eve'. Of course she has just as much right to usurp the name as I do, but I'm worried it's going to cause confusion - there are a lot of posts floating round out there that appear to be signed by 'Eve', and it's not immediately obvious that points to

1790:

It may just be me, but taking a look at all the clerknotes many of them say the the target account has been notified while their talkpage is red linked. I'm going to go over all the ones now but just for future reference remember to check that it has been notified and if they haven't please place

1523:

The implementation of Unified Login may mean that bureaucrats should agree to perform renames in circumstances where our practice is currently to decline them. I have created the above page in an attempt to get a feel for community consensus on SUL and how far bureaucrats should go to accommodate

1274:

Hence why I think it would be useful to set up some sort of working group to put consider clashes, and advise of the best outcome; or, simply set up a 'crat chat system. Whichever way you look at, disputes are going to arise somewhere along the line, and we're going to need a medium through which

543:

Would someone with more technical ability than I modify the template to make a paramter whereby one can make note of a username on other projects with a siginificant amount edits? Also, the bureaucrats might want to decide now if there is convention about whether or not significant edits on other

184:

has been inactive since December 2006 and has no edits. I would like to usurp this user account for my own personal use. I don't have a username of my own, but if I have to register one to make a usurpation, I will (I just don't want to make another unused account, therefor continuing the cycle).

4444:

I have to say that I agree with WJBscribe. Realistically, there's no need for an extra layer of bureaucracy, and there's no rush. We have a number of active bureaucrats, and they are the appointed functionaries of the process. Why have appointed clerks when we already have appointed bureaucrats?

2891:

Hello - I have an account (jboriott) that I created a while ago. I just went to log in, but can't remember the password. When I ask wiki to send the password, it tells me there's no eMail address associated to the account. I'd like to use that account so that I can eMail articles and such. I

3320:

I got a usurpation back in November. However, I notice my talk page now says: "Talk: Dasani (usurped)". This does not fit with my user page, which simply reads: "User: Dasani". Is there a way to change this? It's turning out to be somewhat of a hassle, as I cannot "receive" new messages even if

4046:

If I understand your question correctly, you need to go to each Knowledge sister project individually and request a change or usurpation there. An en.wiki name change is valid only for the en.wiki. A ja.wiki name change will be valid only in ja.wiki. Go to ja.wiki to make ja.wiki name changes.

1184:

You are mistaken I think EVula. Single login will unify all accounts owned by the same user, and ignore those controlled by someone else. It is possible to unify login and all projects except one for example. Usurping accounts to comply with SUL is being left to local community discretion. See

362:

Accounts which are eligible for usurpation must have no contributions (but if they were against the GFDL, i.e. reverted as vandalism), that maybe allowed. They must have no deleted contributions, either. As Skynet has contribs, usurpation is not appropriate here to 'take over' that username...

3256:

Knowledge, I forgot my password and some link from a guy (Name: Philosepher or something like that, I forgot.) He said I could possibly acess my old account (Not able to get the password because I didn't provide an E-Mail adress.) or at least use the same name if I went here. My username is

4375:

on the understanding that crats would remove anyone who was more hinderance than help. It looks like most revisions of that page have included the statement: "Non-bureaucrats who comment on these pages do not have the authority to accept or decline requests. This authority lies only with a

3283:

As I have now noted on your userpage, you should be able to usurp the account (although I can't guarantee it). However an usurpation is NOT going to be granted until you are an established editor. You should create an account and start editing. After several weeks or months when you are an

333:

What's the process of the usurpations, i've read the instructions but a bit confused. When i registered i wanted to use SKYNET as my username but had to use Yun-Yuuzhan, i've checked Skynet log's and he hasn't made any edits since last February. But am wondering whether my current entire

2317:

do I really need a username on EN to ask for renaming an other person? I'm active in other wikipedia languages with a global account. On EN I edit always as IP. So I only need that the other person with the same name is renamed, then I could log in with my existing global account.

2227:

Thanks for the info, should we put a link on the main page saying 'if you're requesting for SUL, click here' with a link to the SUL section next to the main 'click here to request' link to avoid the clerks having to faff around moving requests (not that I mind!).

1257:

One of my greatest concerns is certainly that users will be offended by their username being taken away from them and will cease contributing, whilst the new "owner" of it will continue being active on their own project and make little use of their account here.

3146:

I believe you should post a new request, supplying proof that you own the target account. For example, make a test edit from the target account to its own user page with an edit summary "I am mmartins and I want to usurp this account" then link to that edit. ~

3351:

but unfortunately this was not the right thing to do (the page actually belongs to the usurped user and in any case copy and paste moves are a bad idea). While it is possible for you to sorta resolve the problem by simply copying and pasting the content onto

4319:

to something else", I believe the bot will archive it as it has the relevant template and a crat's name. In other cases, I would prefer it if clerks didn't rejected requests (though I don't have a big issue with it where the account has been indefblocked).

2565:

so they end up in the right archive. That said, there are a lot of requests coming at the moment due to SUL and it would help enormously when I (and other bureaucrats) work our way through them if they are in the correct place and use the right templates.

716:'s edits to another account? We could then easily allow usurpation of old accounts that have GFDL significant edits but no recent edits (say 2 years?), because the person would still be credited for their edits. I'm probably missing a very simple flaw... 2291:

Yep, agreed there. I just wanted to check to see if anybody had possible justifications for archiving separately, so a change in the archiving system could be made before too many SUL requests had been processed and archived. Matter resolved, methinks.

1125:

Wikipedian simply because the person requesting is an administrator on a different project. However, I think a policy could be developed allowing usurpation of formerly active (and currently inactive) accounts for the purposes of SUL consolidation.

1211:

I'm still a bit fuzzy on some of the details regarding SUL. I think I'll just keep my mouth shut and head down until it actually rolls out; it doesn't affect me much anyway, since I've got my username on about half of all the WMF projects anyway. :)

4254:

Well, that would work, except I've seen users that are requesting name changes use the templates in the past. Perhaps we could add the current clerks to the list of users the bot would recognize? Or, perhaps it would just be easier to leave the

3099:

Im not quite sure where to go. In about 2006 I have had installed an account did tree (in words: 3) edits and the next time I come in, the password didn't work any longer. Even a reset doesn't work. What to do? By the way: My user name is

1372:

Ah, alrighty. I'm going to hold off on that; I'm currently waiting for word about a rename on the one wiki where I wasn't able to register as "EVula" (due to someone else registering "Evula"). Once that account is renamed, I'll run it.

4480:

The bot was blocked. I explained to WJBscribe why it was doing what it was doing, but it appears he has disappeared. It is bad form for me to unblock my own bot, but feel free to do it, as the issue has been resolved, I think. --

3806:

want User:Avraham renamed into User:Avi; rather I would prefer the current User:Avi renamed to User:Avi_usurped and then I would register User:Avi as a doppelgänger account. Any and all opinions would be appreciated. Thank you. --

1156:

usurp the same name elsewhere, GDFL be damned, and regardless of how many edits they have on that project (unless we're talking about several thousand edits for both editors, in which case it will be a case-by-case matter, I would

990:

Hey, I've got one that I'm curious if the edits require attribution. The information added by the user has since been removed (not by a revert), so I'm wondering about it, since I want to usurp this user name. The user is

4812:

Guys, I need a response before ClueBot cancels my usurp request. I don't want to put it back because I believe it was probably deleted for a reason. I can't see any reasons for why a talk page would be deleted though...

4400:) seems to be outweighed by the negative (extra bureaucracy and creating an exclusive group of users which invites accusations of favouritism/elitism). Personally, I think I'd spend less time tagging requests as 140:, but that person has already made 41 edits. However, the last of their edits was made over 18 months ago. Is there any way I can get this person to consent to a name change so that I can usurp their username? – 432:

But to be honest i've tried to register an account with SKYNET in caps lock on but it declined because of the user Skynet, and what about all of the contributions i've made will it be re-transferred to SKYNET.

2673:

He or she has only contributed on his/her own page twice (it means that "Meow" didn't do any GFDL contributes), and he/she hasn't been active for 5 years. I don't understand why I cannot do userpation on this

4288:

Well, generally I would prefer that requests were rejected by bureaucrats only in the same way as I don't think non admins should decline page protection requests or unblock requests. If you tag a request as

2726:

I propose that we either remove these altogether, or work on making sure they are accurate, because, currently, they are just not being added and it is leading to gross inaccuracies date-wise on the page. --

2249:

Would it be worthwhile setting up a separate archive for the SUL requests? Or, is it definitely desirable, that they are archived along side the rest of the Usurpation requests, at (for recent requests)

1193:" The question that is going to need to addressed is how far the English Knowledge community wants its bureaucrats to go in renaming accounts to allow users to have the same username on all projects. 730:

We can reattribute the edits from a usurped account to a new one. However, in order to comply with the GFDL, the edits must be atributed to the username that they were initially made under. See

1191:

If you want to usurp an account on another wiki, you should make a request to a bureaucrat on the problem wiki. Subject to local policy, the bureaucrat may be able to rename the target account.

1420:

quite happy to leave this whole affair to bcrat discretion, and favor a pretty liberal approach. When it comes to usernames which do have edits, things are going to become more complicated. –

2588:

I'm sure you've answered this question before, but I'm wondering if it is possible to usurp a username but not actually move my edit history there? I'm thinking I'd like to be able to set up

1925:

remember somebody kind of got screamed at for doing that once, but I think that was because some of what his bot changed was things that other people had said when they were talking to him.

3573:, so if a user has made significant edits, they cannot be usurped. Although it is technically possible, it will not be done for GFDL and licensing reasons. Please bear that in mind. Best, 1666: 2423:

usurpations and how the standards differ from "normal" requests. If there's not shouldn't the process be formalised now that unified login is available to everyone? Should requests like

460:

Only an administrator would be able to create that account. But you can be renamed to it if you choose. And yes, all of your edits and userpages would be transferred to the new username.

201:

mostly only for established editors and people who have a wide range of edits to the project, so, unfortunately, this removes any possibility of a new user receiving usurpation, sorry.

2455:

Does a usurpation mean that when the target account is made available my current edit history would be transferred to it, like normal renaming? Just wanted to clarify this. Thanks,

731: 334:

contributions will be transfered if i place a request to use that account, will it or will i have to start from scratch again or will they allow me to change my username to SKYNET.

88: 76: 71: 63: 3131:

Hullo. I own the target account that I want to usurp (danceswithzerglings). It is new, so I cannot take it via the usual method. Can I still usurp it if I prove ownership of it?

4376:

bureaucrat." Eventually, as the list of clerks was not regularly updated, it was done away with. I have to say that, like Rdsmith4, I am not in favour of appointing clerks for

116:

In general, "where relevant" would describe it. If there's one 24 hour block for 3RR some time ago (for an arbitrary example, one year ago), then I wouldn't bother linking. --

2251: 1892:

was inactive with no edits. Since I'd not heard of usurpation at that point I just changed my signature to sign myself 'Eve', knowing it wouldn't cause any confusion since

1121:

It isn't a borderline case, imho. We simply don't allow GDFL-significant edits to be usurped. As for future situations, I see no reason to take an account away from an

2210:

SUL requests no longer need to wait a week to be performed. Could clerks please assist in moving these from the dated sections to the new "SUL requests" one at the top?

2014:, including non-sysops. This may lead to an influx of requests (usurpations especially) as people rush to unify their accounts. Just thought that I'd let everyone know. 2170: 1648: 3488:

I think - and don't quote me on this - that GDFL significant means "not vandalism or copyright". Could be wrong... we'll see what other, more regular people think.

3386: 1186: 956:

If you're asking if the edits of that account would prevent usurpation, almost certainly. A bureaucrat could break convention, but I can't think of any precedent.

4364: 4677:

Hello. My rename request is not in the usurpation archive. Shouldnt all requests be archived? My account have been successfully renamed on 16 December 2009 by

1242:

project - to take his spot? I honestly can't think of a better way to chase our established users away from Knowledge than telling them that their Knowledge

4133: 1805:

Ok, there weren't as many as I thought (Just WjB's half renames tricking me :P) but there was still a few which where marked as notified when they weren't --

21: 1698: 1749: 1092: 1451:"Accounts that have not been merged after a certain period of time will be forcefully renamed by the software. The date for this is not yet finalised." 1238:

When you have an actively contributing user, why allow someone who hasn't contributed to the project - being an administrator elsewhere doesn't help

1448:. As long as I have followed this, the plan has been to eventually make the tough decisions and fully unify the login system. The current plan is: 724: 4024: 4653:

They are automatically moved when renaming the user (up to 100 pages at least if I recall correctly). You don't need to do it yourself. Regards

1480: 1084: 4829: 4633: 4372: 2627:, but it would probably be advisable not to link the name to a SUL and deprive other projects of that name if you don't plan to edit with it. – 749:(ec)They are. For example, if X was renamed to Y, then Y would be renamed to Y (usurped) or another generic username. A good actual example is 1850:

It's been 7 days, and my request seems to meet the criteria... So, when can i expect this to be done? Please reply on my talk page... Thanks!

4466:

Since the bot hasn't been working for a month, I've gone ahead and collapsed many of the completed requests until the bot comes back online.

2166: 1516: 1545:?) before usurping accounts here if they exist with many (or more) edits on other projects, otherwise the account may get smashed in SUL. — 4335:

Yeah, as far as I know there isn't any real agreement as to whether or not clerks should be rejecting requests, aside from EVula's comment

3655: 3474: 3081: 266: 1766: 3113: 1152:

When SUL actually rolls around, administrators will have top billing (as far as I know); someone who is an administrator on one project

1135:

I would also note that this case was someone with only 126 edits trying to usurp someone with 3,629 edits. That's someone 2 edits this

296: 214: 186: 136:

Is it an absolute prerequisite that the username to be usurped has made no edits whatsoever? I am interested in changing my username to

4161:...I am not really interested in the JA-WP, but the Commons. Well, but that should be the way, so thanks again. I will check it out. -- 4028: 3435:

We can institute this template so that we'll never have to add or remove date headers ever again. I'll just need to notify to botops. —

3060:

Shouldn't this be a dummy account? I can imagine people willing to register this username for fun to do real contributions with it. --

1824:

For the public record, block logs for renamed accounts now move with that account to its new title, rather than remaining behind (see:

4580: 3562: 2358: 2319: 1485: 1160:

At any rate, once it happens, it'll be out of the hands of bureaucrats, and into the hands of stewards (to the best of my knowledge).

1088: 4274:

marking to the 'crats. We're just trying to help the 'crats, of course, but having two templates on a request is a tad superfluous. →

1715:

Don't worry that much ;-) all fr-bureaucrats are, if not fluent, at least good enough in english to understand this kind of request.

3268: 2240: 2185: 2112: 2061: 2026: 1456:

At the least, this may inspire improvements to the user renaming code so that renames move various logs along with the name. — Carl

1002: 2486:

Oh cool, thanks for the quick response. Another thing, I hope this isn't 'against the rules' but ages ago I registered the account

2036:

Noted; a wise move, notifying everybody. I'm standing by with my clerk hat, at least, and I'm sure a number of editors are too. :)

903:

It would most likely be performed at a bureaucrats discretion as long as the target username meets the requirements for usurpation

3298:

BTW, given your edit history and continuing vandalism, I would suggest you wait a while before bothering trying to usurp anything

3836:

Yes; and also I do not know how secure the password on the current User:Avi and I am concerned about a password hack attempt. --

3427: 914: 691: 654: 609: 51: 17: 3940: 3915: 3616:

FYI some of the other language wikis will still perform usurps on users with GFDL significant edits (no.wiki, for example, see

2806: 101:

Are blocklogs linked for every rename, or only ones where there are specific reasons for them staying (e.g. Arbcom sanctions)?

818:

I always do, but I think its the newer clerks that don't. Although, I can see where you are coming from, WJB, on this matter.

4740: 4531: 4075:

So, you sent me to go to the sister projects, OK, I did, but where exactly shall I publish my usurp request?? I need help. --

3902:

Is this the way? { {subst:en:usurpation requested}} I tried that, but I do not speak (nor read ;) jananese. Can you help me?

3822:

I guess the dormant account is actually secure, so is your concern really to ensure the rest of the SUL is equally secure? --

2477:

Yes it would: your edits would be transferred in a usurpation, just like in a regular rename. You won't lose all your edits.

1612: 1574: 494:

That's good i've placed a request for it to be changed and I'll tell EVula to change the adoption tag if it does get change.

2011: 4631:

What happens to the subpages of the old username? Do they get moved to the new username, or do I have to move them myself?

2010:

Just a heads-up for the 'crats + clerks that frequent the renaming/usurpation boards: the SUL tool is (as of writing this)

4516:) has accidentally requested the usurp the other way 'round (although I can't see a listing in this page or the history). 4453: 3459: 3443: 3239: 2850: 2735: 1098:

forever—it's going to come up sooner-or-later, and catch us unaware—so we may as well start, at least, thinking about it.

3617: 661:

I think it's good. As a side note, is there a particular reason CHU has arrows that point → way, but here they're ← way?

154:

user to consent to the rename, then it could be carried out, I believe. However, the account does not have an email set

1587:

and the account that made the request hasn't edited since May 2007. No reason why it should stop you getting the name.

1340:

Have you unified your login though? Its an option in the first page of "my preferences" under "Global account status:"

1030:

I spoke with WJB on this, who suggested that it would require a 'crat-wide discussion as it is irregular, but now that

861:

Hello. I know this is unusual, but I would like to usurp a name for my secondary account, which would be used only for

637:

This user has made contributions on another Wikimedia project (meta:User:Chris G), this may be a barrier to usurpation.

4911: 4875: 4833: 4803: 4784: 4750: 4726: 4713:? I did everything I was told to, and my request was never rejected. What did I do wrong? A reason wasn't even given. 4698: 4685: 4666: 4647: 4621: 4485: 4474: 4455: 4438: 4419: 4350: 4329: 4280: 4249: 4212: 4170: 4153: 4121: 4107: 4084: 4056: 4040: 4012: 3979: 3889: 3873: 3859: 3845: 3831: 3816: 3784: 3763: 3742: 3684: 3662: 3637: 3605: 3591: 3564: 3550: 3536: 3516: 3500: 3482: 3461: 3445: 3414: 3397: 3380: 3333: 3307: 3293: 3276: 3243: 3229: 3197: 3183: 3165: 3154: 3140: 3121: 3089: 3069: 3049: 3038: 3024: 3013: 2986: 2967: 2942: 2915: 2880: 2853: 2824: 2810: 2786: 2767: 2754: 2737: 2715: 2690: 2658: 2644: 2617: 2577: 2551: 2523: 2507: 2481: 2471: 2445: 2404: 2389: 2366: 2344: 2327: 2300: 2286: 2270: 2221: 2160: 2147: 2129: 2095: 2077: 2044: 1981: 1959: 1941: 1918: 1873: 1859: 1840: 1813: 1799: 1775: 1760: 1744: 1724: 1710: 1692: 1678: 1660: 1642: 1616: 1598: 1578: 1553: 1535: 1504: 1468: 1435: 1390: 1367: 1351: 1335: 1313: 1300: 1283: 1269: 1252: 1229: 1204: 1177: 1147: 1130: 1115: 1072: 1051: 1019: 984: 966: 950: 916: 897: 850: 827: 812: 782: 769: 744: 693: 670: 656: 611: 586: 553: 516: 469: 455: 415: 400: 369: 356: 318: 304: 290: 274: 240: 222: 207: 194: 167: 147: 125: 110: 3347:

however this was not done. Instead you appear to have copied and pasted your user talk page onto the redirect target

1318:...eh? I just tried logging in on a wiki I have no account on (an increasingly smaller number), and couldn't log in. 2623:

I realize this is over a month later, but hopefully this reaches you: this would probably be possible since there's

4899: 4825: 4797: 4778: 4720: 4642: 4238:

templates, not just those assigned by bureaucrats? It would certainly make it easier for clerks and 'crats alike. –

3780: 3738: 3368: 3348: 2802: 2599: 1937: 1101:

Particularly, I am interested in how we are going to handle the "close-calls"—e.g., the recently-rejected request,

42: 3112:, because I don't get in here other than with an IP! (Excuse me please: reading is much better than writing ;-)) — 2696:

Don't worry. I've left a note on the request. You may also have to remove that cat image from your signature, per

3797:

Has there been a decision about usurpation of dormant accounts for doppelgänger purposes? In my particular case,

2499: 2463: 1720: 1674: 938: 595: 3752:

edits were indeed yours? Occasionally, renames will leave chunks of a contribution history to the old account. –

4678: 4594: 4447: 3650: 3453: 3437: 3235: 3171: 2729: 1866: 832:

I have to admit that I'm guilty here on a couple of occasions. I've just about got the hang of it now, though.

780: 722: 155: 4371:

took over the process and did away with appointed clerks. Anyone who wanted to help out could then sign up at

3478: 3085: 270: 3117: 3109: 2649:

Thanks for the info! I'll think about what I want to do. (I find the SUL doesn't work too well anyway, BTW.)

300: 4617: 4586: 3620:). Is this because they are in violation of the GFDL, or do they have a more lenient interpretation of it? – 3065: 2547: 2362: 2323: 2049:

There have been two in the last few minutes alone! Looks like SUL may cause some headaches for bureaucrats!

1015: 218: 190: 2676: 2275:

I can't think of any need to keep SUL requests archived separately. I think we're OK continuing as we are.

754: 503: 442: 387: 343: 4869: 4574: 4348: 4247: 3761: 3584: 3560: 3514: 1853: 877:

account "uss" for that purpose, so the question is, do I have chances to usurp (no contributions account)

2911: 2903: 1209:

Everyone mark your calendars: I was wrong about something. Not likely to happen again any time soon... ;)

572:

This user has made contributions on another Wikimedia project (yes), this may be a barrier to usurpation.

4894: 4856: 4821: 4792: 4773: 4715: 4637: 4525: 4117: 3952: 3921: 3727:? I'm not clear on if there was a misstep somewhere or this is just old junk to ignore at this point. — 3360: 3340: 3272: 3193: 3179: 3136: 3061: 2999: 2235: 2180: 2107: 2056: 2021: 1608: 1570: 1430: 996: 842: 4569: 4496: 2142: 2090: 834: 666: 549: 495: 465: 434: 411: 379: 335: 286: 4907: 4817: 4710: 4545: 4430:

was the old version of this proposal, but it seems to have changed since then in a haphazard manner.

4052: 3885: 3264: 3162: 3046: 3021: 2492: 2456: 1716: 1670: 1638: 1500: 909: 904: 686: 681: 649: 644: 604: 599: 4537: 4183:

I believe that the bot (when I haven't blocked it) is only programmed to archive requests tagged as

3974: 3970: 3946: 2907: 2899: 2593: 2354: 181: 174: 4520: 4513: 4492: 4415: 4325: 4208: 3720: 3700: 3645: 3393: 3376: 3303: 3289: 3208:

If you own both accounts, use the Usurp request template but place it on the regular request page (

3189: 3175: 3132: 2935: 2873: 2685: 2637: 2573: 2538:

Why are users who attempt to usurp an account that already exists asked to repost their request at

2441: 2416: 2396: 2385: 2340: 2282: 2217: 1955: 1604: 1594: 1566: 1531: 1347: 1265: 1200: 980: 808: 775: 717: 144: 4746: 4613: 3724: 3601: 3546: 3532: 2836: 2821: 2701: 2519: 2400: 2135: 2083: 1977: 1969: 1914: 1551: 1492: 1006: 663: 546: 462: 408: 283: 3556:

I can't seem to find it, either. Must have been accidentally removed somewhere along the line. –

3505:

Yes, to the best of my knowledge, fixing a type is considered a GFDL-significant contribution. –

559:

I've added an interwiki=yes param as well as a place to link to the user's userpage on the wiki:

406:

Skynet account is relatively inactive, but a bureaucrat would need to tell you authoritatively.

281:

the bureaucrats, so it might be best to wait until one of them comments here before doing that.

4203:

by a bureaucrat, in which case there is therefore no point in others tagging requests as such.

3850:

Is there any significant opposition or reason for me not to go ahead and usurp the account? --

3284:

established editor, try reuqesting an usurpation according to the process outlined on the page

3108:. Who can help me? I am glad to get any help in the cause, but please be so kind and answer me 2589: 1735:(outdent): I'd appreciate a similar translation/request page on Italian Knowledge. Thanks. — 797:

If someone makes a request on this page for a name that isn't already taken, please move it to

4863: 4404: 4394: 4341: 4268: 4240: 4197: 3869: 3855: 3841: 3827: 3812: 3754: 3575: 3557: 3507: 2982: 2847: 2760: 2749: 1806: 1792: 1753: 1740: 1706: 1688: 1656: 1445: 1306: 1295: 1249: 1144: 1127: 1068: 1047: 962: 946: 894: 766: 740: 579: 314: 233: 121: 4363:

asked the checkuser clerks (who were appointed by him and other checkusers at that time (see

1829: 4765: 4410:

in obvious circumstances than I would supervising and managing a group of appointed clerks.

4232: 4146: 4113: 3491: 3364: 3353: 3344: 3222: 2895:

Is there a way for me to reclaim my id? It's been a good while since I've used my account.

2654: 2613: 2605: 2230: 2175: 2102: 2051: 2016: 1825: 1422: 1383: 1328: 1222: 1170: 1039: 992: 3667:

Ah, ok, I didn't realize we had some leeway there. Must pay attention to the SUL subpage. –

3596:

Its not like their account is deleted. It is just moved. I dont get why it cant be done. --

3541:

I also think it is stupid how someone who hasnt made an edit in 6 years cant be Usurped. --

3527:

I would like to know where my request went. I searched the archives and couldnt find it. --

3339:

There appears to be a problem with the way your usurpation was handled. Your old talk page

2759:

I've just talked with Cobi on irc and he said he would add this functionality to the bot --

2350: 4660: 4356: 4316: 4166: 4142: 4103: 4080: 4048: 4036: 4008: 3881: 3258: 3218: 3158: 3042: 3017: 3003: 2922: 2424: 1634: 1496: 1379: 1324: 1218: 1166: 1042:

account, but as there are some edits, I understand that may not be possible. Thoughts? --

229: 3371:

to be merged back. Unfortunately this requires the attention of an admin which I am not

4412: 4322: 4301: 4205: 3776: 3734: 3677: 3630: 3570: 3389: 3372: 3299: 3285: 2927: 2865: 2680: 2629: 2568: 2478: 2437: 2380: 2335: 2277: 2212: 2126: 1951: 1897: 1630: 1589: 1526: 1342: 1260: 1195: 975: 803: 677: 262: 141: 3749: 3716: 1884:

This is a bit of a strange situation, but bear with me... I've been using the account

801:

for the user, changing the format of the request to that for a simple rename. Thanks,

633: 568: 4733: 4384: 4377: 4368: 4259: 4222: 4187: 4092: 3802:

not the request would be accepted before actually posing it, especially in that I do

3597: 3542: 3528: 3209: 3170:

Thank you for your answer. I have made such an edit on the target account user page (

3105: 2860: 2817: 2697: 2562: 2558: 2539: 2514: 2420: 1973: 1965: 1910: 1902: 1885: 1770: 1546: 1463: 1187:

unified login - Someone is using my name on another wiki, how can I get that account?

1031: 932: 823: 798: 4019: 1986:

Ta-dah, problem solved! Now all I need to do is figure out how to adjust my sig ;-)

4468: 4432: 3865: 3851: 3837: 3823: 3808: 3359:) please DO NOT do so. The correct way for this to be handled will probably be for 2978: 2974: 2844: 2745: 2624: 1870: 1736: 1702: 1684: 1652: 1291: 1064: 1043: 958: 942: 862: 758: 736: 535: 310: 117: 1765:

In case anybody want's to know: at sv.wiki requests such as these can be done at

1139:

trying to usurp someone with only two less edits this year than the "usuper" has

4852: 4695: 4682: 4360: 3642:

It's because for people with SULs we tend to be a little more lenient about it.

3406: 3325: 3101: 2650: 2609: 2543: 2125:

Then let's either wake the bureaucrats up or create some more, or even both. :)

2071: 750: 616:

edit I have changed the parameter so you specify the user page in the interwiki=

163: 137: 106: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1769:, although this page is for any administrative request (not only usurpations). 4655: 4162: 4137: 4099: 4076: 4032: 4004: 3261:

if that link doesn't work just Ace Shadow. Please see what you can do... :-(

3213: 3149: 3033: 3008: 2487: 1374: 1319: 1213: 1161: 927:

There is one that may, the non-link one, but I'd figure I'd ask better minds:

253: 247: 3569:

Well, that is not our fault. All user's contributions are licensed under the

1542: 258: 4482: 3770: 3728: 3708: 3669: 3622: 2783: 2667: 1929: 4512:

Can someone help with the above usurp? It appears that the original user (

3321:

others manage to post it. Not to mention, I do not enjoy the red link tab.

620:

so to produce the above you would type {{CUU|interwiki=meta:User:Chris G}}

3798: 2293: 2263: 2153: 2037: 1893: 1889: 1833: 1459: 1360: 1276: 1108: 1035: 928: 819: 365: 203: 1946:

Would it solve these problems if I'd put "NL" in my sig (something like

3473:

anyone, I'm just curious about what "GDFL significant" actually means.

2955: 2427:

be fulfilled even though there are clearly GFDL significant edits like

1888:

for over a year, and very soon after registering I noticed the account

1665:

I've just tried something a bit easier for non-french-speaking users :

879: 378:

Understood, i just wanted to check anyway, i'm fine with this account.

2100:

If this keeps up we'll get a month's worth of requests in a few days!

1059: 4339:. I like Javert's idea of having a set of designated clerks though. – 4066:

as there is no interwiki possible at all (as far as I understand iw).

3212:). Just explain the situation in your request, and we'll process it. 3075:

Usurpation Without Registration (have I heard that somewhere before?)

160: 103: 2415:

I was just wondering if there's currently a page that documents the

2357:. Sorry that my english is not so good, I hope you could help me. -- 3451:

I've found several flaws with the idea, unfortunately. Forget it. —

1909:

doesn't get tarred with my past mistakes? Sorry to cause trouble!

1524:

SUL-based rename requests. Input from all welcome and appreciated.

4367:

if interested)) to clerk this page. When Essjay left the project,

2542:? Surely you can just do a rename here and save them the trouble. 1667:

fr:Wikipédia:Demande de renommage de compte utilisateur/Usurpation

2561:. If I come across them I usually do them and them move them to 1248:

could be usurped by someone who's a stranger to the project. --

594:

I have modified the template. To modify the interwiki part edit

295:

Then i'll wait for a bureaucrat to comment before i do anything

2436:

clear outcome from them, apologies if I've just overlooked it.

29: 2835:

I don't want to rename my account, but I would like to usurp

1964:

Yeah that sounds a good idea! I've already changed my sig to

1565:

have forgotten about it or given up. Can I still go ahead? --

2709: 4112:

The help template should be used on your user talk page. --

3719:

last year. I was wondering, should I remove redirects for

3402:

I did not touch it at all. The moderator did everything...

2816:

Usually about a week, which it says in the instructions. —

2863:(the no.wiki editor, mostly). Can't hurt to try, though. – 1305:

SUL is now active for all admins across wikimedia wikis --

1085:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard § Single User Log-in

2152:

We seem to be doing fine. :) No need to panic, just yet.

1791:{{subst:usurpation requested}} ~~~~ on their talk page -- 1649:

w:fr:Wikipédia:Demande de renommage de compte utilisateur

1481:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Single User Log-in

4602: 4553: 4427: 4336: 3992: 3984: 3958: 3927: 3712: 3704: 3357: 2840: 2432: 2428: 1697:

Also should be easier on your collective eyes than our

1585: 1089:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical) § Single user log-in

874: 4031:, but it does not work... I need your help. Thanks. -- 1034:

is a reality, my ultimate preference would be to have

704:

When a name is usurped, all edits made from user name

3905:

My point is like this: ====:en:Oashi → :ja:Oashi====

2333:

No, just let me know which account you need renamed.

1541:

Perhaps we should start running the SUL lookup tool (

1486:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)#Single user log-in

4380:

work. The gain (crats not having to tag requests as

309:

Soleil has it right. Merry Christmas, by the way. --

2252:

Knowledge:Changing username/Usurpations/Completed/9

1750:

it:Knowledge:Cambiare_il_nome_utente/Riassegnazione

1683:The non-francophone world thanks you, Blinking! -- 923:

Do the edits by this user require GFDL attribution?

544:projects matter, and not make it up as it happens. 4848:The link you gave us was to the talk page for the 865:: I want users to be able to use short and simple 4218:Well, could it be re-programmed to recognize all 2134:I have a feeling its going to be a long night :) 712:. So how comes we can't again transfer user name 158:, so I don't see a way to attain the permission. 3715:a new user account in May 2008 and that it made 2892:never have, and don't plan on editing articles. 2355:Users with name "Steffen2" on Wikimedia projects 4771:I don't know what I'm doing wrong... *Sniff* 3387:Knowledge:Cut and paste move repair holding pen 2921:Yes, go through the usurp process described at 4023:I have looked for the equivalents of the page 2843:, but has no contributions. Is this possible? 1752:appears to be their usurpation request page -- 3234:Thank you for your help, it's now been done. 2625:no accounts on other projects using that name 2557:I have asked clerks to move such requests to 8: 893:or my request most likely would be denied? — 265:). Is this possible? / How would i do this? 3188:Do I put a link to this edit on this page? 2374:Done. You should now be able to sign in as 4029:ja:Knowledge:Changing_username/Usurpations 2839:for doppleganger purposes. It was created 1543:http://tools.wikimedia.de/~vvv/sulutil.php 1491:Trying to keep discussion in one place... 1093:Knowledge talk:SUL/Consultation on renames 699: 3571:general free documentation license (GFDL) 1603:Thanks so much for the quick response! -- 734:when I asked this question a while back. 4158:Aha, OK, thanks both, for your comments. 3104:and I own several accounts around wiki: 1767:sv:Knowledge:Begäran om åtgärder#Begäran 4355:That was the position when this board ( 4025:Knowledge:Changing_username/Usurpations 4018:And for wikimedia as well. See my SUL: 2998:I recently mugged a name; might I have 4373:Knowledge:Changing_username/Assistance 2973:Reasonable question. I'll raise it at 1038:renamed, and I would register it as a 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4132:There are instructions in English at 1517:Knowledge:SUL/Consultation on renames 7: 2954:moving a request from USURP to CHU. 2906:) 19:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC) Jim B 578:but it could use some fine tuning -- 4764:Now my usurp notice was deleted at 4709:Why was my usurp request deletd by 3965:Datestamp: 11:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 3618:no:Special:Contributions/Xeno (SUL) 1444:This should really be discussed at 4732:Not sure, but it's been fixed. ··· 3793:Usurp for doppelgänger purposes II 3711:. Today, I noticed that Erikster 3428:Changing username/Usurpations/Days 1057:Hmm, the response is overwhelming 28: 4761:Why does everyone hate me?! ='( 2743:That would be a job for the bot. 232:when commenting on talk pages. -- 4503: 4306: 4291: 3968:For bureaucrat use: SUL report ( 2773: 2675: 2070:Yay. This is going to be fun... 1275:adjudication will be available. 1058: 632: 567: 33: 18:Knowledge talk:Changing username 2294: 2264: 2154: 2038: 1927: 1834: 1361: 1277: 1109: 1010: 1007: 3898:how to usurp japanese account? 2987:10:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1476:Another SUL thread? See also: 776: 718: 700:I'm misunderstanding something 1: 4912:03:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 4876:02:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 4834:02:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 4804:22:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC) 4785:12:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC) 4751:21:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 4727:21:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 4694:. I found it in the archive. 4686:07:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC) 4667:08:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 4648:08:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 4486:07:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 4475:05:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 4456:09:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 3864:Appears not :-) . Thanks. -- 3244:02:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3230:00:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3198:00:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 3184:23:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 3166:14:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 3141:00:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 3122:12:38, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 3070:21:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2831:Usurping for dopple purposes? 917:21:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 898:16:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 851:20:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 828:19:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 813:02:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 783:00:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 770:23:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 745:23:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 725:23:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 708:are transferred to user name 319:11:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 305:11:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 291:23:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 275:22:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 241:11:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 223:23:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 208:16:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 195:18:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 148:18:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 126:19:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 111:19:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 4699:10:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC) 4622:12:04, 4 November 2009 (UTC) 3415:02:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 3398:11:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 3381:10:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 3334:07:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 3308:08:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 3294:10:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 3095:Where to go? — lost password 3090:19:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 3050:14:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 3025:12:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 2584:When a usurp is not a usurp? 2231: 2206:New section for SUL requests 2176: 2103: 2052: 2017: 1079:Single User Login: thoughts? 694:12:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 671:06:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 657:03:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 612:02:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 587:02:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 554:19:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 168:00:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 4892:Lol, I'm so stupid... XD 4439:05:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 4420:12:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 4351:00:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 4330:22:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 4281:22:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 4250:22:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 4213:21:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 3277:17:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 2968:17:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2943:15:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 2916:19:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 517:19:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 470:19:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 456:19:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 416:19:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 401:16:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 370:16:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 357:16:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 4936: 4501: 3685:23:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3663:23:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3638:17:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3606:18:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3592:17:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3565:17:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3551:16:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3537:16:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3501:21:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 3483:21:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 3468:Usernames with minor edits 3369:User talk:Dasani (usurped) 3349:User talk:Dasani (usurped) 3343:should have been moved to 1995:21:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 1982:20:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 1960:19:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 1942:15:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 1919:21:11, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 1874:22:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1860:21:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1841:10:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1814:09:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1800:09:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1776:08:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC) 1761:05:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC) 1745:11:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC) 1725:21:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1711:21:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1693:21:01, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1679:20:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1661:19:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1643:09:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1617:23:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1599:23:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1579:23:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1536:01:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1505:09:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1469:11:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1436:11:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1391:05:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1368:23:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1352:18:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1336:14:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1314:09:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1301:00:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1284:23:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1270:23:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1253:23:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1230:14:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1205:23:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1178:22:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1148:22:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1131:22:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1116:21:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1082: 1073:14:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1052:16:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC) 1020:23:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 618:link to interwiki userpage 4673:Not in usurpation archive 4171:01:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 4154:16:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 4122:16:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 4108:16:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 3890:06:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 3874:04:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 3785:19:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 3764:23:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 3743:23:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 3517:19:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 3462:09:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 3446:09:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 3385:I've made a request here 3127:Accout less than 6 months 2881:00:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 2859:Probably not, due to the 2854:00:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 2825:19:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 2801:How long will this take? 2787:12:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC) 2768:10:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC) 2738:16:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 2716:19:37, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 2691:19:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 2659:19:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 2645:02:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 2245:20:02, May 29, 2008 (UTC) 2190:12:09, May 30, 2008 (UTC) 2167:know where our towels are 2117:18:38, May 27, 2008 (UTC) 2066:18:28, May 27, 2008 (UTC) 2031:17:58, May 27, 2008 (UTC) 2006:SUL tool open to everyone 1880:Usurpation of a nickname? 1867:User talk:Catzrthecoolest 985:13:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 967:04:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 951:09:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 596:Template:interwiki exists 4679:User:Anonymous Dissident 4085:12:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 4057:11:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 4041:11:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 4013:11:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 3860:05:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 3846:15:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 3832:08:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 3817:20:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 3172:User:Danceswithzerglings 2811:03:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 2755:04:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 2618:19:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 2578:09:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 2552:09:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 2524:23:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2508:23:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2482:23:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2472:23:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2446:22:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 2411:SUL Question (apologies) 2405:10:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 2390:09:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 2367:09:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 2345:09:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 2328:08:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 2301:11:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 2287:09:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 2271:20:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 2222:19:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 2161:11:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 2148:18:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 2130:18:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 2096:18:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 2078:18:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 2045:18:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 1554:00:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 156:Special:Emailuser/PeeJay 3367:and for the history of 2964:who used to be Soxred93 2949:Question about template 2433:significantly expanding 1584:The request was denied 774:Ok. Thank-you both :). 4859:still has the notice. 4705:Usurp request deleted? 4359:) was first created - 2419:as to what to do with 1896:had no edits. But now 4857:User talk:Awesomeness 4757:Usurp NOTICE deleted? 4134:ja:Knowledge:利用者名変更依頼 3980:Email target username 3361:User talk:Lady Galaxy 3341:User talk:Lady Galaxy 2803:Electrical Experiment 2169:, there's no need to 857:Usurping for a puppet 755:User:Alison (usurped) 213:goddammit you guys -- 46:of past discussions. 3909:Current username: ] 3748:Is it possible that 3699:Hello, I used to be 2351:de:Benutzer:Steffen2 2313:Question to Username 1988:never mind, got it! 1495:failed to take off. 1446:m:Help:Unified login 680:knows. I'll ask him 4449:Anonymous Dissident 3934:Target username: ] 3769:of contributions. — 3455:Anonymous Dissident 3439:Anonymous Dissident 3236:Danceswithzerglings 3056:User:REQUESTED_NAME 2731:Anonymous Dissident 1629:With the advent of 676:I don't know maybe 4897: 4795: 4776: 4718: 4452: 4418: 4328: 4211: 3759: 3725:User talk:Erikster 3512: 3458: 3442: 3031:Issue resolved. ~ 2734: 1631:meta:Unified login 1189:. In particular: " 963:wasn't he just...? 741:wasn't he just...? 263:commons:User:Kagee 4904: 4895: 4837: 4820:comment added by 4802: 4793: 4790:Hello? Anyone? 4783: 4774: 4749: 4725: 4716: 4497:User:Repositoryhp 4446: 4411: 4321: 4204: 3753: 3506: 3499: 3452: 3436: 3267:comment added by 2965: 2841:about a month ago 2728: 2714: 2504: 2468: 2246: 2191: 2146: 2118: 2094: 2067: 2032: 1989: 1467: 941:). Thank you. -- 762: 317: 180:The user account 124: 94: 93: 58: 57: 52:current talk page 4927: 4915: 4902: 4896:Uber-Awesomeness 4893: 4872: 4866: 4836: 4822:Uber-Awesomeness 4814: 4800: 4794:Uber-Awesomeness 4791: 4781: 4775:Uber-Awesomeness 4772: 4766:Talk:Awesomeness 4747:Talk to Nihonjoe 4743: 4739: 4736: 4723: 4717:Uber-Awesomeness 4714: 4663: 4658: 4607: 4605: 4597: 4589: 4558: 4556: 4548: 4540: 4507: 4506: 4471: 4450: 4435: 4409: 4403: 4399: 4393: 4389: 4383: 4344: 4314: 4310: 4309: 4299: 4295: 4294: 4279: 4273: 4267: 4264: 4258: 4243: 4237: 4231: 4227: 4221: 4202: 4196: 4192: 4186: 4152: 4149: 4097: 4091: 4000: 3997: 3989: 3962: 3931: 3773: 3757: 3731: 3695:Erikster to Erik 3683: 3680: 3674: 3658: 3653: 3648: 3636: 3633: 3627: 3590: 3587: 3578: 3523:Bws2cool - Blake 3510: 3498: 3496: 3489: 3456: 3440: 3431: 3413: 3405: 3365:User talk:Dasani 3354:User talk:Dasani 3345:User talk:Dasani 3332: 3324: 3279: 3228: 3225: 3004:the usurped name 2966: 2963: 2960: 2941: 2938: 2932: 2879: 2876: 2870: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2764: 2732: 2712: 2706: 2704: 2688: 2683: 2679: 2643: 2640: 2634: 2576: 2534:Another question 2500: 2464: 2388: 2343: 2298: 2285: 2268: 2233: 2229: 2220: 2178: 2174: 2158: 2140: 2138: 2105: 2101: 2088: 2086: 2075: 2054: 2050: 2042: 2019: 2015: 2012:open to everyone 1993: 1987: 1950:for example)? - 1933: 1856: 1838: 1810: 1796: 1757: 1597: 1549: 1534: 1457: 1434: 1427: 1389: 1386: 1365: 1357:Remark for EVula 1350: 1334: 1331: 1310: 1281: 1268: 1228: 1225: 1203: 1176: 1173: 1113: 1062: 1026:Doppelification? 1012: 1009: 983: 872: 871:/scriptname.js") 849: 847: 839: 811: 778: 760: 720: 643:Hope this works 636: 583: 571: 539: 515: 454: 399: 368: 355: 313: 237: 206: 120: 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 4935: 4934: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4905: 4900: 4870: 4864: 4815: 4798: 4779: 4759: 4741: 4734: 4721: 4711:Weberty Moreira 4707: 4675: 4661: 4656: 4636: 4629: 4603: 4595: 4588:global contribs 4587: 4573: 4554: 4546: 4539:global contribs 4538: 4524: 4510: 4509: 4504: 4500: 4469: 4464: 4448: 4433: 4407: 4401: 4397: 4391: 4387: 4381: 4342: 4317:User:Kingturtle 4307: 4305: 4292: 4290: 4275: 4271: 4265: 4262: 4256: 4241: 4235: 4229: 4225: 4219: 4200: 4194: 4190: 4184: 4181: 4179:Done / not done 4147: 4140: 4095: 4089: 3993: 3985: 3983: 3947:global contribs 3935: 3910: 3900: 3795: 3771: 3755: 3729: 3697: 3678: 3670: 3668: 3656: 3651: 3646: 3631: 3623: 3621: 3585: 3576: 3574: 3525: 3508: 3492: 3490: 3470: 3454: 3438: 3433: 3425: 3411: 3403: 3363:to be moved to 3330: 3322: 3318: 3262: 3259:User:Ace Shadow 3254: 3252:Forgot password 3223: 3216: 3129: 3106:SUL around wiki 3097: 3077: 3058: 2995: 2962: 2956: 2951: 2936: 2928: 2926: 2898:Please advise. 2889: 2874: 2866: 2864: 2833: 2799: 2774: 2772: 2762: 2730: 2724: 2708: 2702: 2686: 2681: 2671: 2638: 2630: 2628: 2586: 2567: 2536: 2453: 2413: 2379: 2334: 2315: 2276: 2211: 2208: 2136: 2084: 2073: 2008: 1991: 1940: 1882: 1854: 1848: 1822: 1808: 1794: 1788: 1755: 1717:Blinking Spirit 1671:Blinking Spirit 1627: 1625:Interwiki links 1588: 1562: 1560:Wierd situation 1547: 1525: 1512: 1510:SUL and renames 1423: 1421: 1384: 1377: 1341: 1329: 1322: 1308: 1259: 1223: 1216: 1194: 1171: 1164: 1095: 1081: 1028: 974: 925: 866: 859: 843: 835: 833: 802: 795: 732:the explination 702: 581: 541: 533: 502: 441: 386: 364: 342: 331: 261:) and commons ( 251: 235: 202: 178: 134: 99: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 4933: 4931: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4910:comment added 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4807: 4806: 4758: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4706: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4674: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4632: 4628: 4625: 4610: 4609: 4566: 4565: 4561: 4560: 4502: 4499: 4493:User:WRNstaff‎ 4490: 4489: 4488: 4463: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4315:as renamed by 4302:User:WJBscribe 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4180: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4159: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4087: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4060: 4059: 4015: 4002: 4001: 3966: 3963: 3932: 3899: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3862: 3794: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3696: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3524: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3503: 3475:86.130.127.245 3469: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3432: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3317: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3253: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3128: 3125: 3096: 3093: 3082:70.108.164.252 3076: 3073: 3057: 3054: 3053: 3052: 2994: 2993:Talk page move 2991: 2990: 2989: 2950: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2888: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2832: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2670: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2585: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2535: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2496:sdfasdf1231234 2460:sdfasdf1231234 2452: 2449: 2412: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2314: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2207: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2165:As long as we 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2007: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1936: 1898:User:Dutch_Eve 1881: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1847: 1844: 1821: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1773: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1695: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1561: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1521: 1520: 1511: 1508: 1489: 1488: 1483: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1439: 1438: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1210: 1158: 1103:Stefan ← st-fl 1080: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 970: 969: 924: 921: 920: 919: 892: 885: 867:importScript(" 858: 855: 854: 853: 830: 794: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 701: 698: 697: 696: 641: 640: 639: 638: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 576: 575: 574: 573: 560: 540: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 373: 372: 330: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 267:83.108.121.243 257:no.wikipedia ( 250: 245: 244: 243: 228:Please remain 211: 210: 177: 175:User:Antonidas 172: 171: 170: 133: 130: 129: 128: 98: 95: 92: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4932: 4913: 4909: 4903: 4898: 4891: 4890: 4889: 4888: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4877: 4874: 4873: 4868: 4867: 4858: 4854: 4851: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4835: 4831: 4827: 4823: 4819: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4808: 4805: 4801: 4796: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4782: 4777: 4769: 4767: 4762: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4737: 4731: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4724: 4719: 4712: 4704: 4700: 4697: 4693: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4684: 4680: 4672: 4668: 4665: 4664: 4659: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4645: 4644: 4639: 4635: 4626: 4624: 4623: 4619: 4615: 4614:Fribbulus Xax 4606: 4601: 4598: 4593: 4590: 4585: 4582: 4579: 4576: 4571: 4568: 4567: 4563: 4562: 4557: 4552: 4549: 4544: 4541: 4536: 4533: 4530: 4527: 4522: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4515: 4514:User:WRNstaff 4498: 4494: 4491: 4487: 4484: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4473: 4472: 4462:Bot archiving 4461: 4457: 4454: 4451: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4437: 4436: 4429: 4428:WP:CHU Clerks 4421: 4417: 4414: 4406: 4396: 4386: 4379: 4374: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4349: 4346: 4345: 4338: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4327: 4324: 4318: 4313: 4303: 4298: 4282: 4278: 4270: 4261: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4248: 4245: 4244: 4234: 4224: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4210: 4207: 4199: 4189: 4178: 4172: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4150: 4144: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4130: 4123: 4119: 4115: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4094: 4088: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4021: 4020: 4016: 4014: 4010: 4006: 3998: 3996: 3990: 3988: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3972: 3967: 3964: 3960: 3957: 3954: 3951: 3948: 3945: 3942: 3939: 3933: 3929: 3926: 3923: 3920: 3917: 3914: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3903: 3897: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3805: 3800: 3792: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3774: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3762: 3758: 3751: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3726: 3722: 3721:User:Erikster 3718: 3717:contributions 3714: 3710: 3707:the username 3706: 3702: 3701:User:Erikster 3694: 3686: 3681: 3675: 3673: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3654: 3649: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3634: 3628: 3626: 3619: 3615: 3614: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3588: 3582: 3581: 3572: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3563: 3561: 3559: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3539: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3522: 3518: 3515: 3511: 3504: 3502: 3497: 3495: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3457: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3444: 3441: 3429: 3424: 3416: 3410: 3409: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3388: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3355: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3329: 3328: 3315: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3260: 3251: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3226: 3220: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3206: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3151: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3126: 3124: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3114:93.128.78.118 3111: 3107: 3103: 3094: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3074: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3062:Prince Kassad 3055: 3051: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3010: 3005: 3001: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2961: 2959: 2948: 2944: 2939: 2933: 2931: 2924: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2896: 2893: 2886: 2882: 2877: 2871: 2869: 2862: 2861:SUL collision 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2852: 2849: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2830: 2826: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2796: 2788: 2785: 2780: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2766: 2765: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2753: 2751: 2747: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2736: 2733: 2721: 2717: 2711: 2705: 2699: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2689: 2684: 2678: 2669: 2666: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2641: 2635: 2633: 2626: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2598: 2595: 2591: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2572: 2571: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2533: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2516: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2505: 2503: 2497: 2495: 2489: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2467: 2461: 2459: 2450: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2384: 2383: 2377: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2312: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2281: 2280: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2267: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2253: 2248: 2247: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2234: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2216: 2215: 2205: 2189: 2188: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2139: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2128: 2124: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2076: 2069: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2059: 2055: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2043: 2041: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2030: 2029: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2013: 2005: 1994: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1938:Contributions 1934: 1932: 1931: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1906: 1904: 1903:User:Eve Hall 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1886:User:Eve Hall 1879: 1875: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1858: 1857: 1845: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1837: 1831: 1827: 1819: 1815: 1812: 1811: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1785: 1777: 1774: 1771: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1701:requests. -- 1700: 1696: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1624: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1559: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1529: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1507: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1470: 1465: 1461: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1432: 1428: 1426: 1418: 1417: 1392: 1387: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1358: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1332: 1326: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1293: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1241: 1237: 1231: 1226: 1220: 1215: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1198: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1174: 1168: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1106: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1061: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1004: 1001: 998: 994: 989: 988: 987: 986: 982: 979: 978: 968: 965: 964: 960: 955: 954: 953: 952: 948: 944: 940: 937: 934: 930: 922: 918: 915: 913: 912: 908: 907: 902: 901: 900: 899: 896: 891: 887: 884: 883: 878: 876: 870: 864: 856: 852: 848: 846: 840: 838: 831: 829: 825: 821: 817: 816: 815: 814: 810: 807: 806: 800: 793:Clerk request 792: 784: 781: 779: 773: 772: 771: 768: 764: 756: 752: 748: 747: 746: 743: 742: 738: 733: 729: 728: 727: 726: 723: 721: 715: 711: 707: 695: 692: 690: 689: 685: 684: 679: 675: 674: 673: 672: 669: 668: 665: 659: 658: 655: 653: 652: 648: 647: 635: 631: 630: 629: 626: 619: 615: 614: 613: 610: 608: 607: 603: 602: 597: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 585: 584: 570: 566: 565: 564: 561: 558: 557: 556: 555: 552: 551: 548: 537: 532: 518: 514: 513: 509: 508: 507: 501: 500: 499: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 471: 468: 467: 464: 459: 458: 457: 453: 452: 448: 447: 446: 440: 439: 438: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 417: 414: 413: 410: 404: 403: 402: 398: 397: 393: 392: 391: 385: 384: 383: 377: 376: 375: 374: 371: 367: 361: 360: 359: 358: 354: 353: 349: 348: 347: 341: 340: 339: 328: 320: 316: 312: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 297:83.108.123.72 294: 293: 292: 289: 288: 285: 279: 278: 277: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 259:no:User:Kagee 255: 249: 246: 242: 239: 238: 231: 227: 226: 225: 224: 220: 216: 215:72.187.89.100 209: 205: 199: 198: 197: 196: 192: 188: 187:72.187.89.100 185:Thank you. -- 183: 176: 173: 169: 166: 165: 162: 157: 152: 151: 150: 149: 146: 143: 139: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 113: 112: 109: 108: 105: 96: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 4861: 4860: 4849: 4770: 4763: 4760: 4708: 4691: 4676: 4654: 4641: 4630: 4611: 4599: 4591: 4583: 4577: 4570:Repositoryhp 4550: 4542: 4534: 4528: 4511: 4467: 4465: 4431: 4426: 4343:Juliancolton 4340: 4311: 4296: 4287: 4276: 4242:Juliancolton 4239: 4182: 4163:Franta Oashi 4100:Franta Oashi 4077:Franta Oashi 4033:Franta Oashi 4022: 4017: 4005:Franta Oashi 4003: 3994: 3986: 3969: 3955: 3949: 3943: 3937: 3924: 3918: 3912: 3904: 3901: 3803: 3796: 3756:Juliancolton 3698: 3671: 3647:bibliomaniac 3644: 3643: 3624: 3579: 3558:Juliancolton 3540: 3526: 3509:Juliancolton 3493: 3471: 3434: 3407: 3326: 3319: 3255: 3148: 3130: 3098: 3078: 3059: 3032: 3007: 3000:my talk page 2997: 2996: 2957: 2952: 2929: 2897: 2894: 2890: 2867: 2834: 2800: 2778: 2761: 2744: 2725: 2722:Date headers 2672: 2631: 2602: 2596: 2587: 2569: 2537: 2513: 2501: 2493: 2465: 2457: 2454: 2414: 2395:Thank you -- 2381: 2375: 2373: 2359:92.194.86.27 2336: 2320:92.194.86.27 2316: 2295: 2278: 2265: 2241: 2236: 2213: 2209: 2186: 2181: 2155: 2113: 2108: 2062: 2057: 2039: 2027: 2022: 2009: 1990: 1947: 1928: 1926: 1907: 1883: 1851: 1849: 1835: 1823: 1807: 1793: 1789: 1754: 1699:babelfishing 1628: 1590: 1563: 1527: 1522: 1515: 1490: 1475: 1424: 1362: 1356: 1343: 1307: 1290: 1278: 1261: 1250:Tim4christ17 1244: 1243: 1239: 1196: 1190: 1153: 1145:Tim4christ17 1140: 1136: 1128:Tim4christ17 1122: 1110: 1107: 1102: 1100: 1096: 1029: 1005:). Thanks. 999: 976: 971: 957: 935: 926: 910: 905: 889: 881: 873:. I already 868: 860: 844: 836: 804: 796: 735: 713: 709: 705: 703: 687: 682: 662: 660: 650: 645: 642: 627: 617: 605: 600: 580: 577: 562: 545: 542: 511: 510: 505: 504: 497: 496: 461: 450: 449: 444: 443: 436: 435: 407: 395: 394: 389: 388: 381: 380: 351: 350: 345: 344: 337: 336: 332: 282: 252: 234: 212: 179: 159: 135: 102: 100: 82: 47: 41: 4906:—Preceding 4853:Awesomeness 4816:—Preceding 4681:. Regards. 4114:Closedmouth 3269:68.189.6.27 3263:—Preceding 3102:User:Lantus 3006:as well? ~ 2837:User:Yngvar 2232:RichardΩ612 2177:RichardΩ612 2104:RichardΩ612 2053:RichardΩ612 2018:RichardΩ612 1865:Replied on 1425:Luna Santin 993:Red Phoenix 863:userscripts 837:Icestorm815 751:User:Alison 40:This is an 22:Usurpations 4049:Kingturtle 3882:Kingturtle 3316:Talk pages 2698:guidelines 2674:account.-- 1846:My Request 1820:Block logs 1635:Carcharoth 1497:Carcharoth 1083:See also: 248:User:Kagee 4627:Subpages? 4604:block log 4555:block log 4413:WJBscribe 4323:WJBscribe 4206:WJBscribe 3959:block log 3928:block log 3709:User:Erik 3390:Nil Einne 3373:Nil Einne 3300:Nil Einne 3286:Nil Einne 3002:moved to 2908:Jboriotti 2900:Jboriotti 2668:User:Meow 2479:Acalamari 2438:Guest9999 2431:and then 2417:consensus 2127:Acalamari 2082:Another? 1952:Dutch Eve 1289:in mind. 777:Seraphim♥ 719:Seraphim♥ 678:WJBscribe 182:Antonidas 97:Block log 89:Archive 6 83:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 64:Archive 1 4830:contribs 4818:unsigned 4643:chat me! 4612:Cheers, 4581:contribs 4532:contribs 4521:WRNstaff 4508:Resolved 4405:not done 4395:not done 4369:Rdsmith4 4357:WP:CHU/U 4312:Not done 4269:not done 4198:not done 3941:contribs 3916:contribs 3880:Cheers. 3799:User:Avi 3703:, and I 3598:Bws2cool 3543:Bws2cool 3529:Bws2cool 3265:unsigned 3190:Mmartins 3176:Mmartins 3133:Mmartins 2923:WP:USURP 2887:jboriott 2797:Question 2600:contribs 2451:Question 2429:creating 2425:this one 2397:Steffen2 2376:Steffen2 2173:anyway! 1974:Eve Hall 1966:Eve Hall 1894:User:Eve 1890:User:Eve 1830:bug 7011 1786:Clerking 1605:Camaeron 1567:Camaeron 1548:xaosflux 1245:identity 1157:assume). 1036:User:Avi 1003:contribs 939:contribs 498:→Yun-Yuu 437:→Yun-Yuu 382:→Yun-Yuu 338:→Yun-Yuu 132:No edits 20:‎ | 4908:undated 4865:Ledgend 4850:article 4470:MBisanz 4434:MBisanz 4233:notdone 4027:, like 3824:Dweller 3781:contrib 3739:contrib 3705:usurped 3580:Symonds 2979:Dweller 2845:Yngvarr 2746:seresin 2296:Anthøny 2266:Anthøny 2156:Anthøny 2040:Anthøny 1836:Anthøny 1737:ERcheck 1363:Anthøny 1292:seresin 1279:Anthøny 1111:Anthøny 1011:Phoenix 959:seresin 875:created 869:user:js 737:seresin 329:Process 311:Deskana 118:Deskana 43:archive 4696:Rehman 4692:Solved 4683:Rehman 4416:(talk) 4378:WP:CHU 4361:Essjay 4326:(talk) 4304:" or " 4277:javért 4209:(talk) 3713:became 3494:GARDEN 3408:Dasani 3327:Dasani 3210:WP:CHU 2703:Rudget 2651:Katr67 2610:Katr67 2574:scribe 2563:WP:CHU 2559:WP:CHU 2544:Stifle 2540:WP:CHU 2386:scribe 2378:here. 2341:scribe 2283:scribe 2218:scribe 2137:Rudget 2085:Rudget 1826:r32816 1595:scribe 1532:scribe 1493:WT:SUL 1348:scribe 1266:scribe 1201:scribe 1123:active 1091:, and 1040:doppel 1032:WP:SUL 981:scribe 895:AlexSm 809:scribe 799:WP:CHU 667:(talk) 550:(talk) 466:(talk) 412:(talk) 315:(talk) 287:(talk) 164:(talk) 138:PeeJay 122:(talk) 107:(talk) 4901:talk 4871:Gamer 4799:talk 4780:talk 4722:talk 4138:EVula 3750:these 3577:Peter 3214:EVula 3163:watch 3150:Jafet 3047:watch 3034:Jafet 3022:watch 3009:Jafet 2975:WP:BN 2763:Chris 2515:Andre 2512:Yep. 2488:Athos 2171:panic 1871:Xenon 1809:Chris 1795:Chris 1772:MiCkE 1756:Chris 1375:EVula 1320:EVula 1309:Chris 1214:EVula 1162:EVula 1143:. -- 1141:total 911:fusco 888:user: 880:user: 688:fusco 651:fusco 628:Note: 606:fusco 582:Chris 563:Note: 254:Kagee 236:Chris 230:civil 16:< 4826:talk 4618:talk 4596:logs 4575:talk 4547:logs 4526:talk 4483:Cobi 4385:done 4365:list 4337:here 4297:Done 4260:done 4223:done 4188:done 4167:talk 4143:talk 4118:talk 4104:talk 4093:Help 4081:talk 4053:talk 4037:talk 4009:talk 3991:) ( 3978:) | 3953:logs 3922:logs 3886:talk 3870:talk 3856:talk 3842:talk 3828:talk 3813:talk 3777:talk 3772:Erik 3735:talk 3730:Erik 3723:and 3679:talk 3672:xeno 3632:talk 3625:xeno 3602:talk 3586:talk 3547:talk 3533:talk 3479:talk 3394:talk 3377:talk 3304:talk 3290:talk 3273:talk 3240:talk 3219:talk 3194:talk 3180:talk 3159:play 3155:work 3137:talk 3118:talk 3110:here 3086:talk 3066:talk 3043:play 3039:work 3018:play 3014:work 2983:talk 2937:talk 2930:xeno 2912:talk 2904:talk 2875:talk 2868:xeno 2822:talk 2807:talk 2784:Cobi 2779:Done 2710:logs 2682:Meow 2655:talk 2639:talk 2632:xeno 2614:talk 2606:logs 2594:talk 2590:Katr 2548:talk 2520:talk 2502:talk 2466:talk 2442:talk 2401:talk 2363:talk 2349:I'm 2324:talk 2143:Help 2091:Help 2072:Tito 1978:talk 1970:talk 1956:talk 1930:Soap 1915:talk 1855:Catz 1741:talk 1721:talk 1707:talk 1689:talk 1675:talk 1657:talk 1639:talk 1501:talk 1464:talk 1431:talk 1380:talk 1325:talk 1240:this 1219:talk 1167:talk 1154:will 1137:year 1069:talk 1048:talk 1016:Talk 997:talk 947:talk 933:talk 906:Alex 845:Talk 824:talk 767:talk 761:ENON 753:and 683:Alex 646:Alex 601:Alex 506:zhan 445:zhan 390:zhan 346:zhan 301:talk 271:talk 219:talk 191:talk 4735:日本穣 4662:Why 4300:by 4228:or 4193:or 4145:// 4141:// 3975:new 3971:old 3936:(] 3911:(] 3866:Avi 3852:Avi 3838:Avi 3809:Avi 3804:not 3221:// 3217:// 3174:). 2925:. – 2851:(c) 2848:(t) 2818:Dan 2782:-- 2570:WjB 2421:SUL 2382:WjB 2337:WjB 2279:WjB 2214:WjB 1992:Eve 1948:Eve 1911:Eve 1905:. 1703:Avi 1685:Avi 1653:Avi 1651:-- 1591:WjB 1528:WjB 1460:CBM 1382:// 1378:// 1344:WjB 1327:// 1323:// 1262:WjB 1221:// 1217:// 1197:WjB 1169:// 1165:// 1065:Avi 1063:-- 1044:Avi 1008:Red 977:WjB 943:Avi 929:Avi 890:uss 820:Qst 805:WjB 536:CUU 366:Qst 204:Qst 145:Jay 142:Pee 4855:. 4832:) 4828:• 4768:! 4745:· 4742:投稿 4738:· 4657:So 4646:) 4638:Pa 4634:91 4620:) 4564:to 4495:→ 4408:}} 4402:{{ 4398:}} 4392:{{ 4390:/ 4388:}} 4382:{{ 4347:| 4272:}} 4266:{{ 4263:}} 4257:{{ 4246:| 4236:}} 4230:{{ 4226:}} 4220:{{ 4201:}} 4195:{{ 4191:}} 4185:{{ 4169:) 4151:// 4136:. 4120:) 4106:) 4098:-- 4096:}} 4090:{{ 4083:) 4055:) 4039:) 4011:) 3973:• 3888:) 3872:) 3858:) 3844:) 3830:) 3815:) 3783:) 3779:• 3760:| 3741:) 3737:• 3604:) 3549:) 3535:) 3513:| 3481:) 3430:}} 3426:{{ 3396:) 3379:) 3306:) 3292:) 3275:) 3242:) 3227:// 3196:) 3182:) 3139:) 3120:) 3088:) 3068:) 2985:) 2977:-- 2958:X! 2914:) 2820:| 2809:) 2750:¡? 2748:( 2700:. 2657:) 2616:) 2550:) 2522:) 2506:) 2470:) 2444:) 2403:) 2365:) 2353:, 2326:) 2318:-- 2145:?) 2093:?) 2074:xd 1980:) 1958:) 1917:) 1869:. 1828:, 1743:) 1723:) 1709:) 1691:) 1677:) 1669:. 1659:) 1641:) 1615:) 1577:) 1503:) 1462:· 1388:// 1333:// 1296:¡? 1294:( 1227:// 1175:// 1126:-- 1087:, 1071:) 1050:) 1018:) 961:| 949:) 886:← 882:js 841:• 826:) 765:| 763:54 757:. 739:| 598:. 538:}} 534:{{ 303:) 273:) 221:) 193:) 68:← 4914:. 4862:— 4824:( 4640:( 4616:( 4608:) 4600:· 4592:· 4584:· 4578:· 4572:( 4559:) 4551:· 4543:· 4535:· 4529:· 4523:( 4445:— 4289:" 4165:( 4148:☯ 4116:( 4102:( 4079:( 4051:( 4035:( 4007:( 3999:) 3995:2 3987:1 3982:( 3961:) 3956:· 3950:· 3944:· 3938:· 3930:) 3925:· 3919:· 3913:· 3884:( 3868:( 3854:( 3840:( 3826:( 3811:( 3775:( 3733:( 3682:) 3676:( 3657:5 3652:1 3635:) 3629:( 3600:( 3589:) 3583:( 3545:( 3531:( 3477:( 3412:★ 3404:★ 3392:( 3375:( 3356:( 3331:★ 3323:★ 3302:( 3288:( 3271:( 3238:( 3224:☯ 3192:( 3178:( 3161:• 3157:• 3153:• 3135:( 3116:( 3084:( 3064:( 3045:• 3041:• 3037:• 3020:• 3016:• 3012:• 2981:( 2940:) 2934:( 2910:( 2902:( 2878:) 2872:( 2805:( 2752:) 2713:) 2707:( 2687:✉ 2653:( 2642:) 2636:( 2612:( 2603:· 2597:· 2592:( 2546:( 2518:( 2498:( 2494:A 2462:( 2458:A 2440:( 2399:( 2361:( 2322:( 2242:ɸ 2237:Ɣ 2187:ɸ 2182:Ɣ 2141:( 2114:ɸ 2109:Ɣ 2089:( 2063:ɸ 2058:Ɣ 2028:ɸ 2023:Ɣ 1976:( 1968:( 1954:( 1935:/ 1913:( 1852:— 1739:( 1719:( 1705:( 1687:( 1673:( 1655:( 1637:( 1613:c 1611:/ 1609:t 1607:( 1575:c 1573:/ 1571:t 1569:( 1499:( 1466:) 1458:( 1433:) 1429:( 1385:☯ 1330:☯ 1298:) 1224:☯ 1172:☯ 1067:( 1046:( 1014:( 1000:· 995:( 945:( 936:· 931:( 822:( 759:X 714:Y 710:Y 706:X 664:I 547:I 512:→ 463:I 451:→ 409:I 396:→ 352:→ 299:( 284:I 269:( 217:( 189:( 161:I 104:I 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:Changing username/Usurpations/Archive 5 - Knowledge

Index