1739:
case the archived version may not match the cited version. An online edition of some translation of an ancient or classical text, as used in the example, is not likely to change, so any date of the archive is probably correct, although currently unnecessary. I notice that none of the example references from the Julius Caesar article mentions the date of composition of the original work, the date of publication of the translation, nor the identity of the translator or the publisher of the translation, all of which are more serious issues than an unnecessary archive.Prose can be located within citation syntax with the use of syntax highlighting, and there's at least one gadget that does this. Moving to list-defined references or shortened footnotes also fixes that issue, and while I'm not a fan of adding archives to live links for many domains, I don't think guidance should be changed because the laziest referencing style of just fully defining the reference at its initial point clutters the source. That's more of an argument to encourage better citation styles.I also think the exact proposed wording is a bit ambiguous, in one sentence talking about live links and then dead links, without a clear separation. It could be read as discussing cases of adding archives to
2261:
verification, they do significantly bloat the wikitext and the references displayed to readers.In almost all cases, an archive of a Jstor page does nothing apart from bloat the text. The proportion of the 0.1% of readers who click through a reference link who choose to click the archive link instead of the original, will cause a tiny server load for
Internet Archive instead of Jstor.(In a small minority of cases, the Jstor original will be open access, so the archive will actually support the prose the way the original does. I assume that Jstor occasionally suffers outages, and during those brief windows of time an archive to an open access article will actually have greater value than the non-functional original. I assume it's also possible that Jstor increases access requirements for hosted articles, paywalling previously free ones, in which case an archive could bypass the newly erected paywall. None of these open access cases affect the main thrust of this proposal.)Jstor is basically always up, and never changes the parts of its site structure that host content, and so setting it to
1743:, which is contradictory. I must stress this is not an argument against the idea, just the proposed text.I have, in at least one case, been forced to add archives to live links, due to the way IABot defines "live links". I was cleaning up citations on an article about some museum in Germany. The article cited something like 140 different pages on the museum's site, but they had restructured their domain such that all the links now resolved to a custom 404 page, which automated tools understand as a "live link". After updating the first sixteen or so manually over an hour or two, I despaired and asked IABot to add archives to live links, since it couldn't understand that the links were actually useless.Some domains do drop articles with some frequency. Local news sites, sohu.com, obituary sites, etc. When I'm citing a source like this, I'll add the archive to the live site prophylactically, since I deem it unlikely to work within a year or so.
1054:
runs on its own, it only adds links to archives *when the original is determined to have died*. That is sensible, and I don't know why editors shouldn't be encouraged to check that option (assuming that it is an available option). Also, when links die, it's a good time to check for website reorganization, and reset the original link, as well as check for citation relevance (e.g. has scientific, economic, or census data been superseded?). I keep thinking that there should be an RfC on limiting the addition of archive links, but, as I said, I've received too much push back, from editors thinking that they're doing good, to think that such an RfC would easily pass.
2412:). They discuss Knowledge (XXG), but don't mentioned archive URLs, it's unknown if they are counting links as dead even though they have a live archive URL. Many devils in the details they pass over, so I'm not sure how useful this report is other than "many links die", which has been known for 30 years. I hope folks on Knowledge (XXG) understand this is an existential problem for our project, it's easy to imagine a wasteland in a few decades where most things are unverifiable, and a massive content deletion project begins to "clean up" per WP:V. --
1530:{{Cite journal |last=Steel |first=Catherine |date=2014 |title=The Roman senate and the post-Sullan "res publica" |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24432812 |journal=Historia: Zeitschrift fΓΌr Alte Geschichte |volume=63 |issue=3 |pages=323β339 |doi=10.25162/historia-2014-0018 |jstor=24432812 |s2cid=151289863 |issn=0018-2311 |access-date=26 May 2022 |archive-date=26 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220526152815/https://www.jstor.org/stable/24432812 |url-status=live }}</ref: -->
968:
already done automatically by a back-end process (not IABot). A script monitors every edit on all 300+ language wikis (including Enwiki) and when it detects a URL it makes sure this URL is added to the
WaybackMachine. Nothing needs to be done with this part of the process it's being taken care of already (mostly) by invisible bots. It's a massive load on WaybackMachine disk space and bandwidth, it is being donated free of charge to Knowledge (XXG) by the Internet Archive. --
286:
265:
1152:. I have not used it for this particular use case, but it might be applicable. This would be a "semi-manual" approach, but you could quickly run through dozens of edits faster than via the main editing interface, I think. Take a look and see what you think. One tricksy thing - you will need to create a bot account with a bot password for yourself; the documentation notes this, but it's not obvious on a quick read, I think. --User:Ceyockey (
375:
1523:. Undoing them one by one after intervening edits is extremely difficult; Billjones94 has been repeatedly informed and tagged of how these mass additions are controversial with absolutely no response beyond "Thanks" on talk page edits. Nor do I believe for a second that anyone can review 11,674 bytes of additions β Dempo SC; around 3,000 bytes reviewed per minute β in the elapsed four minutes between the last edit.
1654:. That probably will fail. The feature in question here with selective articles has some utility, the question is should we continue to have this feature on enwiki and if so under what conditions - anyone can run it anytime, only certain users, only x times a day, etc.. what are the guidelines for this feature? Right now there are none, other than it has to be initiated manually which slows the user down some. --
110:
169:
141:
1398:{{Webarchive|url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20180213130122/http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/e/roman/texts/plutarch/lives/caesar%2A.html#1 |date=13 February 2018 }}; Velleius Paterculus, ''Roman History'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220731043323/https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Velleius_Paterculus/2B%2A.html#41 |date=31 July 2022 }}</ref: -->
233:
155:
2407:
This Pew report is not very good surprisingly given their reputation for authority. The word "soft-404" appears nowhere in the document, yet this is one of the hardest problems in link rot detection, and accounts for a sizeable portion of all link rot. It looks like they simply checked for 404 links.
2089:
forum. As for "JSTOR links don't need archiving" (which I agree with), the solution is not "stop adding all links to archive.org", the solution is request an adjustment to IABot not to archive such links. And/or revisit the decision made some years ago to stop
Citation bot from removing URIs to links
1771:
To be clear, I agree that archive URLs for live websites (whether that be IA Bot's idiosyncratic "live" or actually "live" but different) can have some utility. I would, however, oppose their indiscriminate addition. Cluttering up the editor with tens of thousands of bytes is a problem; I think doing
1125:
To your point about preferring the manual approach, that's exactly what I'm trying to account forβ I've usually already done the work of selecting the appropriate archive URL, now I just need the citation updated. If I understand the docs right, running the bot wholesale does everything from scratch;
1007:
In my experience, the archival bots usually add the most recent archive version, which is actually frequently less reliable than earlier archives, since in many cases the target site will have restructured over the years and the newer archives point to empty content.The ideal situation would probably
991:
Worst-case scenario in adding archives automatically: A source is archived several times throughout the years; in 2000, 2010, and 2020. A user adds that source to an article in 2023 and a bot adds a link to the 2000 archive. Source becomes dead in 2024 and the article points the reader to an outdated
899:
actually makes sense because it did rescue sources. What I usually do is to rescue sources manually, this prevents outdated archives, i.e. archived pages that present (very) old information compared to live sources (e.g. a page showing information from 2023 and another showing information from 2015.)
1931:
IABot, when it runs by itself, only places archive links when it detects a dead link as well as setting the url-status to "dead". Since that is a sensible approach, by the same tool that the massive adders are using, why isn't that the bot option that is required: then people can run the bot in that
1738:
parameter, citations to jstor in particular should not get urls either, since that encourages the addition of crufty archives and access dates.I don't really buy the argument that addition of archive urls to live links requires human review, except for urls whose contents change frequently, in which
1632:, we didn't come to a clear outcome and I didn't follow up with an RfC. We're probably due for one. Basically: should every link have an archive? If yes, should this be a bot task or should it be done manually/arbitrarily? If no, in what situations (if any) should archives be added to a live link? β
1053:
10k), when the original links are live, and when the editor has shown no interest in curating the page otherwise; and I receive plenty of questions and push back from even the most experienced editors. GreenC has explained why adding such links isn't actually making the archiving happen. When IABot
1810:
Since I was pinged, Iβll just state that Iβm impartial to this particular matter, but will also mention that Ifly6, hasnβt consider the potential for content drift, especially on news related articles. An archive can preserve the integrity of the original version while a live link may continue to
1985:
Many links don't get archived for many reasons. Log into iabot.org and manage domains. If a domain is set to "subscription" or "permalive" it won't be archived. You can change it. Just be careful things are usually not as simple as they seem ie. some links in a domain work others do not. In those
1869:
Did you not mean "...are automatically substituted...", which is my experience and is in line with the point you're making. I'm in certainly favor of changing this article's wording to discourage mass archive-link additions, especially since this guideline is often used as justification for such
1733:
Some nuance would be better. There are multiple issues here. Working backwards, archives to an online version of printed material on a stable platform, like jstor or gbooks, are indeed essentially useless. I don't think such citations should get archive-urls, nor access-dates, and since we have a
1607:
To be clear, I am not against archive links for live URLs in all cases, I think the following are examples of reasonable justifications: reasonable expectation of the source imminently becoming dead, actual evidence that the archive bypasses paywalls or the GDPR, or actual evidence of the source
1075:
I frequently find myself manually finding archived content from a citation in order to verify a claim, but I don't always have time to update the citation accordingly to aid future readers. Is there a tool that automates adding the necessary three(?) parameters to a citation if I already have the
2265:
should not affect the availability of its contents at all, which are mostly paywalls to as far as
Internet Archive is concerned anyway. The "open access case" can be untangled later, if it is deemed important enough to bother about.What I'm hoping to get from this discussion is consensus that we
1407:
characters (probably upward of 35,000 after including all of my edits). Again, these additions are not necessary to preserve the text of the cited source. This is a live website. And if it became dead the archive URL would be automatically inserted. The costs are, however, substantial for active
1559:
additions make them both harmful to actual content contribution and difficult to remove. Third, many times these archive links add nothing between the website still being live and paywalled sources' archives still being paywalled. We should edit the guidelines to reflect these facts and require
1111:. Personally, I prefer to do the replacement manually as I try to take into account the url access date when selecting a particular archived version to use as the accessible URL, but that is certainly not a necessary thing and not for someone who wants to get 'er done quickly. --User:Ceyockey (
967:
The problem with this bot it's very resource intensive (on the
WaybackMachine) so it runs slow and is semi-manual, thus I don't run it very often. My opinion is archives should only be added into Knowledge (XXG) when the link is dead. In terms of adding archives into the WaybackMachine, that is
915:
Archiving at the time of usage guarantees (in most cases) that we have an archive of the source from when it was used and cited. Once it's been archived once, Archive.org will probably continue to archive it. The worst-case scenario is a source that is used but not archived, and then disappears
1848:
If content drift within a source is due to corrections, then we shouldn't stay with a possibly erroneous archive snapshot. This is in line with why it's doubtful to rely on archive snapshots when a dead-URL is the result of website reorganization, where changing the original link is the better
1716:
seems to say requirements or goals should be specified first etc; if anything it reminds me of how annoying government contracting can be). I also raised a discussion on MediaWiki re changing Citoid to use the Jstor parameter but it doesn't seem that went anywhere because it would have to be a
2080:
I see 0 reason to prohibit preemptive addition of archive links, and certainly oppose the suggested amendments above. I abhor having to go and find archive links long after a link has gone dead. Preemptive addition of an archive link helps ensure that the archive link actually has provided an
713:
seem like the most likely candidate. Is there any chance to fix the old links in some other way than checking them one-by-one and replacing them by the new links manually? Is somebody aware of some announcement from CiteSeerX containing some details about the old identifiers and the new ones?
2260:
from an article) have negative value. The paywall landing page does not display the content that supports the prose citing it, and there's no way to navigate to that content from the archive. You have to go to the live site to log in or purchase a subscription.While they're not useful for
938:
linked above. On articles with hundreds of references to web sources, it's tedious to go through and check each manually, and there's no guarantee
Internet Archive bot will find any dead URLs, but I always instruct it to archive sources just in case there's no archive yet.
2081:
archive, since we all know that archive.org does a bad job tracking websites that themselves do a bad job indicating they're no longer serving a resource at a specific URI (which is not archive.org's fault). If you have a specific issue with specific editors editing in a
1547:
with the citation at the right. Given the stability of Jstor, there are functionally no benefits to these paywalled archive links. The costs in the editability of these articles remains however. Inasmuch as nothing is added for readers, editing ought to take priority.
1411:
Moreover, removing these archive links is significantly more difficult than adding them. It is almost trivial for someone to add unnecessary archive URLs. Not to pick on
Billjones94 (the selection is merely because this series of discussions emerges from an edit on
1188:. You can set it up so that whenever you type the letters "3archive", it will automatically replace it with "|archive-url= |archive-date= |url-status". I also use it to generate empty cite webs, books, journals .. various things like that, saves a lot of typing. --
1890:
there is a
Knowledge (XXG) bot ... that automates fixing link rot. It runs continuously, checking all articles on Knowledge (XXG) if a link is dead, adding archives to Wayback Machine (if not yet there), and replacing dead links in the wikitext with an archived
2104:
I don't see how this response engages with the text of the change: you can hit the "include URLs on all" check box if you can produce a specific justification... like actual evidence of content having been moved. The archive bots also already read
628:
I found a bunch of references to one dead site, but after poking around, I've found out that all the content is still there, just under a slightly tweaked website name. It's even retained the exact same URL structure as before, it's literally
1833:
I don't think that's wholly accurate, my note (discussing good reasons for archiving live pages) which has a last element talking about the possibility of changes to the live website has been present since the original post was made.
933:
yesterday, after spending hours manually finding archives for dead links that had been damaged in script-assisted editing, just to make sure I had found them all. It tagged zero as dead, so it's the same category edit as the one
928:
The worst case scenario I've seen is where the earliest archive of a source postdates the URL being redirected / usurped. Then there's the appearance of a source with an archive, when in fact there is neither.I ran IABot on
1717:
parameter on like all
Wikipedias. Fixing it after the fact for CS templates seems easier to implement. I would also be fine with guidance that Jstor URLs shouldn't appear on Jstor articles but that is a separate issue.
633:
the precise details of the website's name that's changed -- update that, and the links spring back to life. Is there any way to collect the articles which still cite the old URL, so I can correct them en masse using
1870:
activity. I've also heard people justify mass additions as being required by featured article reviewers, although I've only seen recommendations to that effect. Perhaps we should clarify things with the FAC page.
1678:
Not sure I totally agree, most readers are not editors, so having a function link is useful. However archiving Google books or archive.org seems rather redundant, also URLs to Jstor seem completely redundant when
1397:
Suetonius, ''Julius'' {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120530163202/http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Suetonius/12Caesars/Julius*.html#1 |date=30 May 2012 }}; Plutarch, ''Caesar''
2186:) discusses why indiscriminate archiving of live links is a problem and a broader mechanism β don't add archive links for live websites unless you have an actual and specific reason β for resolving them.
1237:
To wrap up the question for myself, and in case this helps anyone else, I created an AppleScript to take a
Wayback URL from the clipboard, parse the URL for the date, and then automatically add the
246:
448:
but Wayback doesn't let me view the video on the archived webpage and archive.today fails to archive a youtube video every time. Is there any other way to archive youtube videos for preventing
440:
There are several articles on Knowledge (XXG) which use YouTube videos as a reference. Since YouTube videos get blocked and/ or deleted frequently, I tried to archive some YouTube videos using
1526:
Moreover, the archive links are also generated for paywalled sources hosted on Jstor (other services like Cambridge Core or Oxford Academic suffer similarly). For example, at Roman Republic:
2442:
213:
2090:
that duplicate identifiers. In general, none of the three issues described here lead to a resolution which is "discourage users in the closest thing to a guideline on the topic".
2274:
is an implementation detail, and how we can go about cleaning up this cruft is also a follow up. Any bot task requires consensus first (unless speedy approved by a BAG member).
1589:. It tagged zero sources as dead and added 6,000 bytes to the article. Triggering it took probably like 15 seconds. Doing nothing and removing it later would have taken hours.
992:
source. Conclusion: After an automatic archive, someone needs to make sure the article links to the proper archive, as there may be different versions of the original source.
1491:
02:05, 16 April 2022 diff hist +3,532β Hindustan Aeronautics Limited SC β Rescuing 18 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1246:
2145:
1629:
1446:
02:45, 16 April 2022 diff hist +1,984β Moinuddin Khan (footballer) β Rescuing 9 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1434:
02:58, 16 April 2022 diff hist +2,468β Churchill Brothers FC Goa β Rescuing 14 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1208:
Client-side scripting is a good approach too; I don't have Windows so I can't use AutoHotKey, but that page has given me enough pointers to go dig around. Thanks!
2452:
1455:
02:39, 16 April 2022 diff hist +8,071β Sporting Clube de Goa β Rescuing 42 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1431:
03:01, 16 April 2022 diff hist +5,778β Mohammedan SC (Dhaka) β Rescuing 28 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1099:
would do what you are looking for. According to the documentation, you can run the bot on demand, but a low-effort approach would be to mark a link as dead, as
1461:
02:32, 16 April 2022 diff hist +3,159β Mohammed Rahmatullah β Rescuing 16 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
651:
1356:
After the words "in general, do not" in the second paragraph of the lede, insert "(with automated tools or otherwise) add archive links for live websites or".
85:
1485:
02:10, 16 April 2022 diff hist +4,811β Mahindra United FC β Rescuing 27 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1464:
02:30, 16 April 2022 diff hist +7,003β Kerala United FC β Rescuing 36 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1389:
What these archive links for live websites do is profoundly clutter the editor. This makes it very difficult for humans to parse. An example of this is the
1961:
1921:
1698:
1488:
02:07, 16 April 2022 diff hist +3,616β South United FC β Rescuing 19 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1452:
02:41, 16 April 2022 diff hist +1,937β Sudeva Delhi FC β Rescuing 10 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1443:
02:46, 16 April 2022 diff hist +425β Sreenidi Deccan FC β Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1130:
the archive link. In short, I've done the first part manually (finding the best archive URL) and want to automate the second half (updating the citation).
551:, can you provide an example? I can report it to IA and they will try to fix. It's a fairly new thing and they need feeback, example links not working. --
176:
2146:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (proposals)/Archive 179#Can we come to a consensus on when it is appropriate to "rescue" live links in an article with IABot?
50:
1621:
is that it should not be done without justification and addition of archive links for live websites would then become an affirmatively justified burden.
1440:
02:49, 16 April 2022 diff hist +8,917β Salgaocar FC β Rescuing 48 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
223:
1467:
02:27, 16 April 2022 diff hist +5,427β Peerless SC β Rescuing 26 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
297:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit
1482:
02:14, 16 April 2022 diff hist +11,674β Dempo SC β Rescuing 63 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1473:
02:21, 16 April 2022 diff hist +2,285β Aizawl FC β Rescuing 12 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1470:
02:25, 16 April 2022 diff hist +3,337β NEROCA FC β Rescuing 16 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
599:
2408:
They consider redirects, but these are often correct and not a problem. Many 404s can be made live again by replacing with a new URL (work done at
1479:
02:16, 16 April 2022 diff hist +1,783β FC Kochin β Rescuing 9 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1458:
02:36, 16 April 2022 diff hist +1,841β FC Kerala β Rescuing 9 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1449:
02:44, 16 April 2022 diff hist +1,246β Punjab FC β Rescuing 6 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1437:
02:54, 16 April 2022 diff hist +15,029β Pune FC β Rescuing 78 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
959:
WaybackMachine (archive.org) is dynamic, not a static database. Archives move and disappear, for many reasons. Because of this I wrote a bot called
2467:
2155:
2150:
1709:
91:
1493:
02:02, 16 April 2022 diff hist +4,435β ONGC FC β Rescuing 25 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1476:
02:19, 16 April 2022 diff hist +1,720β TRAU FC β Rescuing 9 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7 thank Tag: IABotManagementConsole
1383:. It does not actually archive those pages nor does it update those archives. It just adds the links themselves to the article text. Moreover,
1371:
My understanding, for the record, is that links cited on the English Knowledge (XXG) are automatically archived. Hitting the check mark in the
1166:
Thanks; I didn't think of that. I've had AWB perms in the past, so maybe once I have a plan I can whip up something quick and apply. Regards,
702:
2462:
342:
2447:
2457:
2323:). More difficult cases can only be solved with the help of the version history or with the help of web archives and Google search. (i.e.
2238:. They do not archive anything or trigger anything to archive anything while introducing extremely large amounts of markup with no value.
1408:
editors. Just finding real article text, as opposed to background mark up, in articles packed with these archive links becomes difficult.
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
352:
185:
1946:
I'm not sure IABot runs automatically, or at least I've come across pages with long dead links that haven't had archives added. -- LCU
467:
2204:
Assuming that marking as permanently alive prevents the IA Bot check box from adding archive links, IA Bot should mark everything on
1792:
Do not add archive links for live websites (using automated tools or otherwise) without a justification specific to the circumstances
2194:
2170:
647:
2302:
31:
2312:
The SQL query filters not existing top level-domains, all URLs in this List are broken. The Domain in list is in reversed order (
964:
80:
2230:
As to the utility of archive links of paywalled landing pages, they are not useful and they do not provide full text. They are
1955:
1932:
configuration, to detect dead-URLs and add archive snapshots only when the original has died, (almost) as often as they want.
1915:
1692:
2086:
146:
121:
302:
71:
705:, we can see that it was the paper William D. Harvey , Matthew L. Ginsberg: Limited Discrepancy Search. In the new scheme,
2257:
154:
1034:
My understanding is that bots do read the access-date and do as you suggest, although I'm not entirely certain of that.
643:
1149:
1103:
to look for dead-tagged links and replace them with archived links. There are also instructions on activating the bot
189:
1257:
1217:
1175:
1139:
1085:
710:
706:
542:"Doesn't let me view" means that I'm unable to play the video. I'm not saying that the video doesn't even appear. --
2375:
2235:
2045:
1948:
1908:
1685:
1538:
1317:
888:
242:
1790:
Re-reading what I wrote above, perhaps instead word as, prior to the current sentence in paragraph 2 of the lede
870:
856:
734:
2325:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2018%E2%80%9319_Ukrainian_First_League&diff=prev&oldid=1185545810
1556:
1520:
960:
638:? Searching the regular way shows me there are about 2.6k articles still using it (although some may have valid
417:
298:
293:
270:
2319:
Most of the cases are easy to fix (i.e remove a white space-character). In some cases I needed a URL-decoder (
2020:
I don't know. It's easy to check. Create a page in user space, add some citations, run the bot on the page. --
865:
The only way (i think) to repair this is to put the link in a another web archiving service (like archive.is)
127:
17:
1052:
I'm someone who reverts the addition of archive links en masse, especially when the byte count is high (: -->
1821:
1598:
Descriptive statistics of those edits: n is 22, mean is 4567.18, median is 3434.5, max is 15029, min is 425.
1100:
836:
639:
1296:
455:
1250:
1210:
1168:
1132:
1078:
826:
What should be done? Is there a way to repair this? Should it be deleted? Marked with something? Thanks. β
737:, clicking the archive link in the following citation loads a blank archive.org page. Bad snapshot maybe?
642:, which I'd leave untouched), but no easy way to convert that into one grand list for inputting into AWB.
463:
1541:
loads a single front page of the article. On my computer the image thereof does not even load, leaving a
689:
I am not sure what would be the right place to ask about this - I have tried here. As far as I can tell,
61:
2295:
548:
543:
530:
480:
459:
76:
35:
1650:
I don't think it follows we should have an RfC to add an archive link to every URL on Knowledge (XXG)
1551:
Concluding, I want to emphasise three things. First, link rot is a semi-solved problem in which these
866:
852:
2082:
1552:
1516:
1515:
bytes to Knowledge (XXG)'s servers. I also firmly believe that these edits fall within the scope of
2279:
1762:
1757:
I see some of what I just mentioned is already addressed in footnotes. Sorry; I'm still waking up.
1748:
1713:
1634:
1305:
1021:
944:
920:
793:
https://web.archive.org/web/20191028234735/https://results.wuhan2019mwg.cn/index.htm#/organisation
698:
2409:
993:
935:
901:
181:
2397:
1812:
1345:
1313:
1155:
1114:
1108:
848:
827:
694:
423:
1325:
1126:
I'm looking for a way to automate the step of adding the appropriate links to the citation if I
1096:
1288:
1937:
1875:
1854:
1372:
1059:
1039:
997:
905:
588:
57:
2420:
2028:
1994:
1662:
1301:
1196:
976:
719:
674:
610:
580:
559:
510:
493:
419:
374:
2354:
2339:
635:
2243:
2114:
2053:
2011:
1976:
1897:
1839:
1799:
1781:
1722:
1619:
In general, do not (with automated tools or otherwise) add archive links for live websites
1565:
441:
184:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
1076:
archive link in hand? I would prefer this over using a bot, for the reasons given above.
2275:
2190:
2095:
1758:
1744:
1413:
1333:
1017:
940:
930:
917:
662:
285:
264:
1365:
delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer
2436:
2393:
2331:
2306:
2006:
Is this feature to ignore links (like Jstor?) overridden when The Check Box is used?
1393:. This was a single citation (for a half of a sentence about Caesar's wife) therein:
1245:
parameters to an existing citation, pre-filled and with no additional typing needed.
445:
310:
2296:
Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse#external links: URLs that were broken due to editing errors
2234:
if you hit the check mark in the IA Bot management console. The resulting links are
421:
1933:
1871:
1850:
1560:
adding archive links for live URLs to be justified instead of accepted by default.
1337:
1055:
1035:
584:
1708:
A bot to extract Jstor URLs to the Jstor parameter was something I floated in the
1867:
Moreover, archive links are automatically substituted for links that become dead.
2413:
2216:
2021:
1987:
1655:
1555:-esque additions do not help. Second, the enormous volume and rapidity of these
1341:
1329:
1309:
1189:
969:
715:
670:
603:
552:
537:
524:
503:
489:
2374:
Chapekis, Athena; Bestvater, Samuel; Remy, Emma; Rivero, Gonzalo (2024-05-17).
2350:
2335:
579:
Hello, there is a note on alexa.com that it will be retiring on 1 May 2022 See
2349:
I am looking for users who specialize in external link / link rot maintenance
2271:
2239:
2171:
User talk:Citation bot/Archive 37#Moving Jstor and Worldcat URLs to parameters
2110:
2049:
2007:
1972:
1893:
1835:
1795:
1777:
1718:
1561:
1185:
1012:
parameter and add the most recent archived version that does not postdate the
232:
168:
140:
2427:
2401:
2358:
2343:
2320:
2283:
2247:
2166:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Link rot#Mass additions of archive links for live sites
2118:
2099:
2091:
2085:
way, you should approach them and/or discuss their cases at the appropriate
2057:
2035:
2015:
2001:
1980:
1966:
1941:
1926:
1901:
1879:
1858:
1843:
1828:
1803:
1785:
1766:
1752:
1726:
1703:
1669:
1641:
1569:
1321:
1292:
1261:
1221:
1203:
1179:
1161:
1143:
1120:
1089:
1071:
Is there automation for adding archive links that I have found to citations?
1063:
1043:
1025:
1001:
983:
948:
923:
909:
874:
860:
841:
723:
690:
678:
655:
617:
592:
566:
517:
497:
471:
306:
2161:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Link rot#Archiving hundreds of healthy (live) sources
1363:(with automated tools or otherwise) add archive links for live websites or
851:
theres a hashtag in the link, wayback machine does not support hashtags.
449:
1401:
When I removed these archive links en masse, the page shortened by over
2197:, I propose the following (with appropriate wording to be determined):
1385:
archive links are automatically substituted for links that become dead.
305:
and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the
2151:
Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 18#Internet Archive bot cruft
1886:
archive links are automatically substituted for links that become dead
895:? Shouldn't we just archive dead or unfit sources? Unlike the former,
2209:
502:"Wayback doesn't let me view the video" can you give an example? --
2165:
2205:
1906:
Do you know the name of that bot? I've not come across it. -- LCU
1542:
2160:
1148:
Yes, the bot does everything from scratch. Hmm -- you might try
1104:
600:
Knowledge (XXG):Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RfC:_Alexa_Internet
180:, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of
424:
368:
103:
26:
2334:
is clean. But I am not able to do this in english wikipedia.
2201:
Archive links to paywalled landing pages should not be added.
1971:
Do you have any examples of this? I'm unaware of such cases.
2369:
I thought that this might be of interest to this community.
2040:
The Check Box forces addition of useless Jstor archives per
1888:β is that it reflects this on the opposite (non-talk) side:
231:
2290:
external links: URLs that were broken due to editing errors
1416:), the following edits were all done within a single hour:
486:
2156:
Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 18#Further steps?
2225:
prevent the check box in IA Bot from adding archive URLs?
581:
https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410503838999
436:
How to archive YouTube videos on Knowledge (XXG) articles
2301:
hello maintainers. I made a List of ~10000 brocken URLs
763:
https://results.wuhan2019mwg.cn/index.htm#/organisation
2324:
2231:
2041:
1986:
cases you can manage individual URLs the same way. --
1586:
1390:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
896:
892:
666:
315:
2266:
shouldn't have archives of paywall landing pages. The
2208:(and other sites of similar expected permanence like
583:. We currently have just over 800 links to the site.
701:
as an example. The link is dead, but looking in the
2443:
Top-impact WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays pages
2330:I fixed this kind of errors in german wikipedia so
2267:
2262:
2222:
1013:
1009:
963:. It's verifying archive URLs still work. Example:
2256:. Archives of paywall landing pages (the kind I
2109:and pick archives prior to or around that date.
1354:
1352:I propose an addition to this page as follows:
693:changed the scheme they're using. For example,
120:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2184:Mass additions of archive links for live sites
2127:Paywalled landing pages should not be archived
1741:live websites... where the URL no longer works
1267:Mass additions of archive links for live sites
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Dead external links/404/n
8:
883:Archiving hundreds of healthy (live) sources
729:Clicking archive.org link loads a blank page
711:pid/d8b76a9af36448b775997ef0a960e4b0fa585beb
707:pid/efa56b710ff3c6d8b2666971d07c311eeb6c5b40
624:Finding all articles linking to a dead site?
314:
249:on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.
2130:
1811:change the content of its page over time.β
1418:
259:
135:
2193:'s minimalist framing of the question at
665:help in some way? For example, something
2453:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays pages
1772:so should need justification with facts
204:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays pages
1578:
1501:Not a single source was tagged as dead.
1101:the highest priority task appears to be
1066:(edited 00:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC))
261:
137:
2106:
1889:
1885:
1866:
1791:
1740:
1735:
1680:
1618:
1271:This discussion emerges from those on
330:Template:Knowledge (XXG) Help Project
321:and a volunteer will visit you there.
291:This page is within the scope of the
7:
1379:those archived links for live sites
891:, I ask here: is there any need for
109:
107:
126:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
2468:Knowledge (XXG) Help Project pages
2135:Links to some previous discussions
1533:In those cases, the archive links
1279:, and other previous discussions (
198:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Essays
188:. For a listing of essays see the
177:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) essays
25:
2321:meyerweb.com/eric/tools/dencoder/
1423:Billjones94 contribs log, excerpt
1295:@ Knowledge (XXG) talk:Link rot,
174:This page is within the scope of
56:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
2376:"When Online Content Disappears"
1507:bytes of text and in total this
965:Special:Diff/952770913/972737706
373:
284:
263:
167:
153:
139:
108:
51:Click here to start a new topic.
2448:NA-Class Knowledge (XXG) essays
1630:The last time I brought this up
1535:do not preserve anything at all
1150:Knowledge (XXG):AutoWikiBrowser
2365:Pew research study on link rot
2119:22:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
2100:20:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
2058:02:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
2036:20:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
2016:03:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
2002:16:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
1981:15:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
1967:10:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
1942:09:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
1927:09:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
1902:06:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
1884:The way I read what I wrote β
1880:04:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
1859:04:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
1844:18:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1829:18:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1804:18:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1786:17:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1767:17:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1753:17:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1727:17:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1704:16:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1670:16:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1642:16:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1570:16:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1359:The paragraph would then read
317:ask for help on your talk page
1:
2359:07:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
2344:17:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
2044:, giving a link to a largely
1774:specific to the circumstances
48:Put new text under old text.
2463:Mid-importance Help articles
2303:User:β΅/Worklist brocken URLs
1391:old version of Julius Caesar
1095:I think that activating the
567:16:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
518:16:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
498:14:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
485:If Wayback doesn't work try
472:10:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
347:This page has been rated as
327:Knowledge (XXG):Help Project
294:Knowledge (XXG) Help Project
218:This page has been rated as
2458:Project-Class Help articles
2284:06:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
2248:05:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
2212:) to be permanently alive.
1511:of triggering IA Bot added
1262:02:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
916:before it can be archived.
724:10:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
679:21:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
661:Does advanced search using
201:Template:WikiProject Essays
2484:
1222:01:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
1204:01:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
1180:01:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
1162:01:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
1144:00:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
1121:00:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
1090:00:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
1008:be if bots could read the
618:15:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
593:12:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
529:Thank you for the help --
353:project's importance scale
1585:The edit in question was
1381:does not archive anything
1064:23:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
1044:23:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
842:21:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
735:2019 Military World Games
346:
301:, where you can join the
279:
239:
217:
162:
134:
86:Be welcoming to newcomers
2428:16:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
2402:04:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
2254:Agree / Support / Cosign
1291:@ Knowledge (XXG):Bots,
1026:21:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
1002:21:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
984:20:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
949:16:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
924:16:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
910:16:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
875:00:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
861:00:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
739:
656:17:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
487:https://ghostarchive.org
452:on wikipedia articles?
2309:(feel free to fork it)
1503:The average edit added
1299:@ Village pump). Tags:
1273:Billjones94's talk page
644:Buttons to Push Buttons
2182:The above discussion (
1652:(with some exceptions)
1617:My interpretation of
1369:
243:automatically assessed
236:
224:project's impact scale
182:Knowledge (XXG) essays
81:avoid personal attacks
2232:currently being added
1949:ActivelyDisinterested
1909:ActivelyDisinterested
1686:ActivelyDisinterested
1349:. Please tag others.
1318:ActivelyDisinterested
1287:again @ Billjones94,
1283:again @ Billjones94,
405:Archive 4 (2015-2021)
401:Archive 3 (2010-2014)
397:Archive 2 (2008-2009)
393:Archive 1 (2005-2007)
241:The above rating was
235:
887:After asking at the
324:Knowledge (XXG) Help
271:Knowledge (XXG) Help
2380:Pew Research Center
1361:In general, do not
2332:Quarry:query/77794
2314:el_to_domain_index
2307:Quarry:query/78127
2087:dispute resolution
1608:actually changing.
695:Template:CiteSeerX
237:
122:content assessment
92:dispute resolution
53:
2226:
2195:Talk:Citation bot
2180:
2179:
1965:
1925:
1702:
1653:
1498:
1497:
1252:Orange Suede Sofa
1212:Orange Suede Sofa
1170:Orange Suede Sofa
1159:
1134:Orange Suede Sofa
1118:
1080:Orange Suede Sofa
893:this type of edit
840:
549:User:Tech2009Girl
544:User:Tech2009Girl
531:User:Tech2009Girl
458:comment added by
430:
429:
409:Archive 5 (2022-)
367:
366:
363:
362:
359:
358:
258:
257:
254:
253:
250:
102:
101:
72:Assume good faith
49:
16:(Redirected from
2475:
2425:
2418:
2389:
2387:
2386:
2315:
2294:(crosspost from
2269:
2264:
2224:
2220:
2213:
2131:
2108:
2033:
2026:
1999:
1992:
1952:
1912:
1827:
1824:
1816:
1737:
1689:
1682:
1667:
1660:
1651:
1639:
1637:
1622:
1615:
1609:
1605:
1599:
1596:
1590:
1583:
1419:
1406:
1348:
1255:
1253:
1244:
1240:
1215:
1213:
1201:
1194:
1173:
1171:
1153:
1137:
1135:
1112:
1083:
1081:
1015:
1011:
981:
974:
834:
832:
822:
819:
816:
812:
809:
806:
802:
799:
796:
792:
789:
786:
782:
779:
776:
772:
769:
766:
762:
759:
756:
753:
750:
746:
743:
615:
608:
564:
557:
541:
528:
515:
508:
484:
474:
425:
377:
369:
335:
334:
331:
328:
325:
320:
299:the project page
288:
281:
280:
275:
267:
260:
240:
206:
205:
202:
199:
196:
171:
164:
163:
158:
157:
156:
151:
143:
136:
113:
112:
111:
104:
27:
21:
2483:
2482:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2433:
2432:
2421:
2414:
2384:
2382:
2373:
2367:
2313:
2292:
2214:
2176:
2175:
2136:
2129:
2029:
2022:
1995:
1988:
1865:With regard to
1822:
1819:
1814:
1683:exists. -- LCU
1663:
1656:
1635:
1633:
1626:
1625:
1616:
1612:
1606:
1602:
1597:
1593:
1584:
1580:
1557:WP:FAITACCOMPLI
1537:. Going to the
1531:
1521:WP:FAITACCOMPLI
1494:
1424:
1402:
1399:
1300:
1269:
1251:
1249:
1247:More info here.
1242:
1238:
1211:
1209:
1197:
1190:
1169:
1167:
1133:
1131:
1079:
1077:
1073:
977:
970:
961:WP:WAYBACKMEDIC
885:
867:Notrealname1234
853:Notrealname1234
828:
824:
823:
820:
817:
814:
810:
807:
804:
800:
797:
794:
790:
787:
784:
780:
777:
774:
770:
767:
764:
760:
757:
754:
751:
747:
744:
741:
731:
703:Wayback Machine
687:
685:CiteSeerX links
626:
611:
604:
577:
560:
553:
535:
522:
511:
504:
478:
453:
442:Wayback Machine
438:
426:
420:
382:
332:
329:
326:
323:
322:
273:
203:
200:
197:
194:
193:
190:essay directory
152:
149:
98:
97:
67:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2481:
2479:
2471:
2470:
2465:
2460:
2455:
2450:
2445:
2435:
2434:
2431:
2430:
2391:
2390:
2366:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2291:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2228:
2227:
2202:
2178:
2177:
2174:
2173:
2168:
2163:
2158:
2153:
2148:
2142:
2141:
2138:
2137:
2134:
2128:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1846:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1788:
1769:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1645:
1644:
1636:Rhododendrites
1624:
1623:
1610:
1600:
1591:
1577:
1573:
1528:
1496:
1495:
1429:
1426:
1425:
1422:
1414:Roman Republic
1395:
1306:Rhododendrites
1268:
1265:
1243:|archive-date=
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1029:
1028:
989:
988:
987:
986:
954:
953:
952:
951:
931:Monica Macovei
884:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
773:Archived copy
740:
730:
727:
699:10.1.1.34.2426
686:
683:
682:
681:
625:
622:
621:
620:
576:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
533:
520:
500:
437:
434:
432:
428:
427:
422:
418:
416:
413:
412:
407:
403:
399:
395:
388:
387:
384:
383:
378:
372:
365:
364:
361:
360:
357:
356:
349:Mid-importance
345:
339:
338:
336:
311:Help Directory
289:
277:
276:
274:Midβimportance
268:
256:
255:
252:
251:
238:
228:
227:
216:
210:
209:
207:
172:
160:
159:
144:
132:
131:
125:
114:
100:
99:
96:
95:
88:
83:
74:
68:
66:
65:
54:
45:
44:
41:
40:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2480:
2469:
2466:
2464:
2461:
2459:
2456:
2454:
2451:
2449:
2446:
2444:
2441:
2440:
2438:
2429:
2426:
2424:
2419:
2417:
2411:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2381:
2377:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2364:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2328:
2326:
2322:
2317:
2310:
2308:
2304:
2299:
2297:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2259:
2255:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2236:largely blank
2233:
2218:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2196:
2192:
2187:
2185:
2172:
2169:
2167:
2164:
2162:
2159:
2157:
2154:
2152:
2149:
2147:
2144:
2143:
2140:
2139:
2133:
2132:
2126:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2107:|access-date=
2103:
2102:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2088:
2084:
2079:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2034:
2032:
2027:
2025:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1993:
1991:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1963:
1959:
1957:
1956:transmissions
1951:
1950:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1923:
1919:
1917:
1916:transmissions
1911:
1910:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1892:
1887:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1847:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1825:
1818:
1817:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1770:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1700:
1696:
1694:
1693:transmissions
1688:
1687:
1677:
1676:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1661:
1659:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1638:
1631:
1628:
1627:
1620:
1614:
1611:
1604:
1601:
1595:
1592:
1588:
1582:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1558:
1554:
1549:
1546:
1545:
1540:
1536:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1483:
1480:
1477:
1474:
1471:
1468:
1465:
1462:
1459:
1456:
1453:
1450:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1438:
1435:
1432:
1428:
1427:
1421:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1409:
1405:
1394:
1392:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1368:
1366:
1364:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1346:Cyberpower678
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1314:Novem Linguae
1311:
1307:
1303:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1266:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1254:
1248:
1239:|archive-URL=
1223:
1219:
1214:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1195:
1193:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1172:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1157:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1136:
1129:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1070:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
985:
982:
980:
975:
973:
966:
962:
958:
957:
956:
955:
950:
946:
942:
937:
932:
927:
926:
925:
922:
919:
914:
913:
912:
911:
907:
903:
898:
894:
890:
882:
876:
872:
868:
864:
863:
862:
858:
854:
850:
849:Novem Linguae
846:
845:
844:
843:
838:
833:
831:
830:Novem Linguae
738:
736:
728:
726:
725:
721:
717:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
659:
658:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
632:
623:
619:
616:
614:
609:
607:
601:
597:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
582:
574:
568:
565:
563:
558:
556:
550:
547:
546:
545:
539:
534:
532:
526:
521:
519:
516:
514:
509:
507:
501:
499:
495:
491:
488:
482:
477:
476:
475:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
451:
447:
446:archive.today
443:
435:
433:
415:
414:
411:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
386:
385:
381:
376:
371:
370:
354:
350:
344:
341:
340:
337:
333:Help articles
319:
318:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:
290:
287:
283:
282:
278:
272:
269:
266:
262:
248:
244:
234:
230:
229:
225:
221:
215:
212:
211:
208:
191:
187:
183:
179:
178:
173:
170:
166:
165:
161:
148:
145:
142:
138:
133:
129:
123:
119:
115:
106:
105:
93:
89:
87:
84:
82:
78:
75:
73:
70:
69:
63:
59:
58:Learn to edit
55:
52:
47:
46:
43:
42:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
2422:
2415:
2392:
2383:. Retrieved
2379:
2368:
2329:
2318:
2311:
2300:
2293:
2258:just removed
2253:
2229:
2188:
2183:
2181:
2030:
2023:
1996:
1989:
1953:
1947:
1913:
1907:
1813:
1773:
1690:
1684:
1664:
1657:
1613:
1603:
1594:
1581:
1574:
1550:
1543:
1534:
1532:
1529:<ref: -->
1525:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1481:
1478:
1475:
1472:
1469:
1466:
1463:
1460:
1457:
1454:
1451:
1448:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1436:
1433:
1430:
1410:
1403:
1400:
1396:<ref: -->
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1370:
1362:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1351:
1277:my talk page
1270:
1236:
1198:
1191:
1154:
1128:already have
1127:
1113:
1074:
1010:access-date=
990:
978:
971:
936:User:SLBedit
886:
829:
825:
798:archive-date
732:
688:
630:
627:
612:
605:
578:
561:
554:
512:
505:
481:Tech2009Girl
460:Tech2009Girl
454:βΒ Preceding
439:
431:
391:
379:
348:
316:
292:
219:
175:
128:WikiProjects
118:project page
117:
30:This is the
1712:@ WP:Bots (
1539:archive URL
1509:single hour
1302:Billjones94
1014:access-date
889:wrong place
803:2019-10-28
788:archive-url
783:2019-10-19
778:access-date
2437:Categories
2385:2024-05-20
2272:User:IABot
2083:WP:MEATBOT
2046:blank page
1849:solution.
1815:CYBERPOWER
1710:discussion
1553:WP:MEATBOT
1544:blank page
1517:WP:MEATBOT
1186:AutoHotKey
1156:talk to me
1115:talk to me
808:url-status
303:discussion
220:Top-impact
186:discussion
150:Topβimpact
2410:WP:URLREQ
2276:Folly Mox
2268:permalive
2263:permalive
2223:permalive
2191:Folly Mox
1759:Folly Mox
1745:Folly Mox
1334:Folly Mox
1018:Folly Mox
941:Folly Mox
918:Mackensen
897:this edit
691:CiteSeerX
667:like this
663:insource:
575:Alexa.com
307:Help Menu
94:if needed
77:Be polite
32:talk page
2394:Peaceray
1891:version.
1734:bespoke
1587:this one
1097:WP:IABOT
752:Cite web
652:contribs
640:archives
468:contribs
456:unsigned
450:link rot
380:Archives
62:get help
36:Link rot
1962:co-ords
1934:Dhtwiki
1922:co-ords
1872:Dhtwiki
1851:Dhtwiki
1736:|jstor=
1699:co-ords
1681:|jstor=
1513:100,478
1344:, and
1338:Dhtwiki
1056:Dhtwiki
1036:Dhtwiki
994:SLBedit
902:SLBedit
815:}}</
697:offers
585:Keith D
351:on the
222:on the
2217:GreenC
2210:PubMed
1823:Around
1714:policy
1404:28,000
1373:IA Bot
1342:DMacks
1330:GreenC
1310:Scyrme
1184:I use
921:(talk)
716:Kompik
671:Kompik
538:GreenC
525:Rlink2
490:Rlink2
245:using
195:Essays
147:Essays
124:scale.
2416:Green
2305:with
2240:Ifly6
2221:Does
2206:Jstor
2111:Ifly6
2050:Ifly6
2024:Green
2008:Ifly6
1990:Green
1973:Ifly6
1894:Ifly6
1836:Ifly6
1796:Ifly6
1778:Ifly6
1719:Ifly6
1658:Green
1575:Notes
1562:Ifly6
1505:4,657
1326:Kuzma
1192:Green
972:Green
821:: -->
813:dead
768:title
748:: -->
606:Green
598:RfC:
555:Green
506:Green
313:. Or
116:This
90:Seek
38:page.
2398:talk
2355:talk
2340:talk
2280:talk
2270:for
2244:talk
2189:Per
2115:talk
2096:talk
2092:Izno
2054:talk
2042:test
2012:talk
1977:talk
1938:talk
1898:talk
1876:talk
1855:talk
1840:talk
1800:talk
1782:talk
1763:talk
1749:talk
1723:talk
1566:talk
1519:and
1322:Izno
1258:talk
1241:and
1218:talk
1176:talk
1140:talk
1109:here
1107:and
1105:here
1086:talk
1060:talk
1040:talk
1022:talk
998:talk
945:talk
906:talk
871:talk
857:talk
837:talk
742:<
720:talk
675:talk
669:. --
648:talk
631:just
589:talk
494:talk
464:talk
444:and
247:data
79:and
2327:)
1640:\\
1377:add
1375:to
818:ref
758:url
745:ref
733:At
709:or
636:AWB
602:--
343:Mid
309:or
214:Top
2439::
2400:)
2378:.
2357:)
2342:)
2316:)
2298:)
2282:)
2246:)
2117:)
2098:)
2056:)
2048:.
2014:)
1979:)
1940:)
1900:)
1878:)
1857:)
1842:)
1802:)
1794:?
1784:)
1776:.
1765:)
1751:)
1725:)
1568:)
1367:.
1340:,
1336:,
1332:,
1328:,
1324:,
1320:,
1316:,
1312:,
1308:,
1304:,
1275:,
1260:)
1220:)
1178:)
1160:)
1142:)
1119:)
1088:)
1062:)
1042:)
1024:)
1016:.
1000:)
947:)
908:)
873:)
859:)
749:{{
722:)
714:--
677:)
654:)
650:|
591:)
496:)
470:)
466:β’
60:;
2423:C
2396:(
2388:.
2353:(
2351:β΅
2338:(
2336:β΅
2278:(
2242:(
2219::
2215:@
2113:(
2094:(
2052:(
2031:C
2010:(
1997:C
1975:(
1964:Β°
1960:Β°
1958:β
1954:β
1936:(
1924:Β°
1920:Β°
1918:β
1914:β
1896:(
1874:(
1853:(
1838:(
1826:)
1820:(
1798:(
1780:(
1761:(
1747:(
1721:(
1701:Β°
1697:Β°
1695:β
1691:β
1665:C
1564:(
1297:5
1293:4
1289:3
1285:2
1281:1
1256:(
1216:(
1199:C
1174:(
1138:(
1084:(
1058:(
1038:(
1020:(
996:(
979:C
943:(
904:(
869:(
855:(
847:@
839:)
835:(
811:=
805:|
801:=
795:|
791:=
785:|
781:=
775:|
771:=
765:|
761:=
755:|
718:(
673:(
646:(
613:C
587:(
562:C
540::
536:@
527::
523:@
513:C
492:(
483::
479:@
462:(
355:.
226:.
192:.
130::
64:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
