208:
What I'd really like is for every article on a law case to have an accompanying article containing the opinion text (e.g. at Roe v. Wade/opinion), with the body text full of automatically-generated wikilinks to the cases cited therein. That way, if I'm in the article on "Roe v. Wade", I can 1) transclude individual paragraphs of text (to avoid people from making changes when I want an excerpt in the article) and 2) see "what links here" in the form of other cases.
22:
372:
the parent article for the nation should suffice; that the additional comments to actual voting in the state article should confine itself to events actually occurring in that state. e.g. visit from a candidate; fundraising by a candidate; commercials focused on a special interest group in that state (farmers? Union workers?). Anyway, not a mere repeat of the national article.
371:
Is there a corresponding guideline that suggests not copying material from other
Knowledge (XXG) articles? We have a bunch of election articles for 50 states that copy material from the parent article into the state article, much of which is not necessarily germane for that state. It seems to me that
207:
there are thousands of supreme court cases, and almost every one of them is going to have an article which is going to cite the body textr somewhere off-site, even if that means to
Wikisource. However, Wikisource will be inferior to a source like Altlaw, which contains its own version of wikilinks.
257:
I disagree with the part about the national anthems. I believe that the only parts of a national anthem that should be displayed on
Knowledge (XXG) without question are the ones still commonly recited at public events; i.e., the first verse of the Star Spangled Banner, the standard version of God
87:"Do not include copies of primary sources (specifically: text, maps, artworks and other useful images) in Knowledge (XXG). If it is a large source, consider placing it in Wikisource. Wikibooks Annotated works and Project Gutenberg are other alternatives for pursuing primary source documentation."
39:
129:
can reasonably be quoted in full. It's also misleading, because, with thumbnail software, we can easily include primary source images, and I don't think anyone would want to argue we shouldn't. A better name would be
131:
331:
The following examples of specific repositories have been deleted so presumably the section of the paragraph should be deleted too? Are there any "specific repositories" left in
Wikisource?
153:
103:
68:
I suggest that there must be numeral limit to say that this quotation is too lengthy. Please discuss. Otherwise some editors say some quotation as long and some of same length as short.
258:
Save the Queen. Other verses should only be included when the context makes it such that the value of inclusion is greater than the risk of breaking the flow of the article; i.e., in
196:
362:), which can contain translations of the source text into multiple languages (including translations of the source text from its original language into English).
303:, we quote the standard version off to the side, quote the infamous "rebellious Scots to crush" verse in the article, and the official peace version, and
149:
277:
272:
281:
473:
458:
436:
404:
381:
340:
321:
247:
220:
77:
125:
Actually, I'd like a move - the title seems inappropriate: We can and do quote from primary sources, and very short primary sources, e.g.
351:
264:
94:
should not include the artwork being discussed? I'm going to substantially rewrite this to try and get rid of the obvious stupidity =)
465:
450:
392:
235:
231:
52:
191:
215:
145:
99:
359:
175:
108:
Rework done. Nothing controversial, I trust. Anyway, one last thing left to do: a quick move to a more accurate title:
415:
141:
95:
48:
234:
about the future of this and others MoS naming style. Please consider the issues raised in the discussion and
469:
454:
268:
137:
166:
119:
346:
Wikisource has specific repositories for certain types of primary source texts, such as, for example,
187:
173:
is for making a request to EDIT a fully protected page. Requested page moves should be requested at
310:
243:
377:
260:
54:
336:
73:
400:
50:
21:
355:
180:
239:
373:
209:
347:
332:
317:
69:
298:
396:
91:
126:
424:
132:
Knowledge (XXG):Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources
418:
than a guideline in its own right. Should we change its designation?
327:
Paragraph: Examples of combining
Knowledge (XXG) and Wikisource
55:
15:
414:
This page seems like more of an explanatory supplement to
294:
290:
286:
90:Is this seriously saying that, say, an article on
352:Wikisource:Wikisource:Constitutional documents
161:Page is not fully protected. Please note that
8:
446:open order Bo vcs Vid prvt content private
464:Open Bo vcs video pribadi content private
360:Wikisource:Wikisource:National anthems
203:proposal: exception for law articles?
64:Distinction between short and lengthy
7:
14:
307:Hickson's version linked to with
20:
176:Knowledge (XXG):Requested moves
437:22:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
405:12:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
230:There is currently an ongoing
1:
416:Knowledge (XXG):Summary style
78:16:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
382:16:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
197:03:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
154:02:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
104:02:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
410:Should this be a guideline?
391:There is a conversation at
490:
248:20:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
474:20:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
459:20:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
341:11:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
322:19:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
221:22:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
216:makes occasional mistakes
393:Village Pump (policy)
387:Related conversation
395:about this policy,
142:Shoemaker's Holiday
96:Shoemaker's Holiday
261:God Save the Queen
434:
422:
219:
157:
140:comment added by
61:
60:
481:
449:
435:
432:
431:
429:
420:
356:national anthems
314:
302:
284:
253:National anthems
226:MoS naming style
212:
195:
172:
171:
165:
156:
134:
124:
118:
56:
24:
16:
489:
488:
484:
483:
482:
480:
479:
478:
447:
444:
425:
423:
419:
412:
389:
369:
329:
308:
275:
259:
255:
228:
218:
205:
185:
169:
163:
162:
135:
122:
116:
114:
85:
66:
57:
51:
29:
12:
11:
5:
487:
485:
477:
476:
443:
440:
411:
408:
388:
385:
368:
365:
364:
363:
328:
325:
254:
251:
227:
224:
214:
204:
201:
200:
199:
113:
112:Move requested
110:
84:
81:
65:
62:
59:
58:
53:
49:
47:
44:
43:
35:
34:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
486:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:Computer code
441:
439:
438:
430:
428:
417:
409:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
386:
384:
383:
379:
375:
366:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:constitutions
345:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
326:
324:
323:
320:
319:
312:
306:
300:
296:
292:
288:
283:
279:
274:
270:
266:
262:
252:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
225:
223:
222:
217:
211:
202:
198:
193:
189:
184:
183:
178:
177:
168:
167:editprotected
160:
159:
158:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
133:
128:
121:
120:editprotected
111:
109:
106:
105:
101:
97:
93:
88:
82:
80:
79:
75:
71:
63:
46:
45:
42:
41:
37:
36:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
466:120.188.93.9
451:120.188.93.9
445:
426:
413:
390:
370:
330:
316:
304:
256:
238:if you wish
229:
206:
181:
174:
115:
107:
89:
86:
83:Okay.. um...
67:
38:
26:
136:—Preceding
92:Beer Street
311:Wikisource
232:discussion
182:Lightsup55
127:Jack Sprat
240:GnevinAWB
374:Student7
367:Question
305:possibly
210:Agradman
150:contribs
138:unsigned
40:/Archive
27:Archives
333:Hugo999
318:Sceptre
278:protect
273:history
70:Smatrah
397:Sadads
354:) and
282:delete
442:Ready
299:views
291:watch
287:links
470:talk
455:talk
427:Sdkb
421:{{u|
401:talk
378:talk
337:talk
295:logs
269:talk
265:edit
244:talk
236:vote
179:. --
146:talk
100:talk
74:talk
472:)
457:)
433:}}
403:)
380:)
339:)
315:.
313:}}
309:{{
297:|
293:|
289:|
285:|
280:|
276:|
271:|
267:|
246:)
190:|
186:(
170:}}
164:{{
152:)
148:•
123:}}
117:{{
102:)
76:)
468:(
453:(
399:(
376:(
358:(
350:(
335:(
301:)
263:(
242:(
213:/
194:)
192:C
188:T
144:(
98:(
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
