1417:-listed house's location was restricted at the owner's request but our article gave the house's street address, and I've also seen ones in which a historic district's location was restricted but the NHRP nomination form gave the district's exact boundaries. Figuring that the cat was out of the bag, so to speak, in those cases, I went ahead and added coordinates. I've also seen cases in which the NHRP restricts an archaeological site's location and I declined to add coordinates, even though I knew where the place is. Re archaeological sites elsewhere: If the site is labeled on Google Maps or OpenStreetMap, I think it would be overscrupulous to avoid giving coordinates in our article. I think your suggested tag might be a good idea, especially to replace
1446:, but we do not, for example, routinely publish people's home addresses, because there are sensible reasons not to do so. Approximate locations may be the right way to go in some circumstances; I did this recently for an archaeological site, where the exact location is restricted, but it is publicly described as being near a particular locality, by geolocating the article with that of the locality. For other cases, there might not be any locality to use in this way, and perhaps the use of very approximate coordinates might be a good idea for these cases. In any case, if we do have that tag, it should not be applied too widely, and just kept for edge cases like sensitive archological sites whose location is not already well-known. —
1025:
so I'm not sure how many sets of new coordinates you're going to come up with; but I'm willing to hold my judgment. (When I'm looking for coordinates to add to one of our articles, one of the things I usually do is check to see if they're present in a corresponding article in the relevant-language WP, and I can't say that I often find any that way.) Your plan "to generate lists of candidate coordinates from these that they can be assessed for quality" seems a good first step, and I'd like to see how that turns out. Will you post the results somewhere so that others can inspect them?
1044:
meters are better than nothing. As it happens, a few minutes ago I corrected an error of 50 meters in my own coords for an urban photo, so no use my complaining about other moderately dirty suppliers. You might want to get into touch with whoever thinks they handle coords in WikiData; they might have something important to say, like, nevermind importing WPDE or other WP language coords into WPEN; just put it in WD and use a template to show it in
English.
238:
1216:
WikiShootMe and
Wikmedia Commons Android App, both of which I use to find photographic targets, including those that are mentioned in articles but have no article of their own. This activity finds many erroneous coords that were imported on a mass basis from other databases. I make a rough WD coord adjustment in the field and finer upon getting to the big computer. No worry about how many languages are using that particular WD item.
949:, there's as yet no real cross-wiki integration to enable human curation, and thus Wikidata is not ready to be useful as a way to do this yet. And of course, if I do the interwiki copying, I intend to export any coordinates I find to Wikidata as part of the process, if they're not already present, so that as and when Wikidata is eventually usable for this purpose, we can easily migrate to using Wikidata as the master data source.
32:
424:
66:
115:
97:
1352:. This would indicate that the article describes somewhere with known coordinates, but that those coordinates are restricted from public view with good reasons, and Wikipedians should not attempt to add coordinates to those articles. The primary use would be for archeological sites, whose locations are restricted to thwart vandals and grave robbers. —
1510:
currently shows coordinates are displayed to a precision of 0.1 second of arc. This is ridiculous overprecision, and entirely inappropriate to an article about such a serious subject; coordinates exist to show location, not to identify a particular doorknob. I've added format descriptors to the coord
1043:
I fairly often correct bad coords in WD; some of our large imports are indeed dirty. Probably coords that are mass-imported from any
Knowledge (XXG) will be no dirtier than the average import; might even be cleaner. I'm comfortable with the notion that a load of coords with median errors of 10 or 50
909:
While I don't intend to import coordinates from
Wikidata, as I don't believe it is well-curated at the moment, this is suggestive that a substantial number of articles will have coordinates on non-English Wikipedias, many of which have a sufficiently large user-base that they can be considered to be
1151:
Thanks for pointing out the RfC, which I was completely unaware of. If there's a requirement for a reliable source citation for the
Wikidata coordinates, then I'm fine with it, and this is really good news. Do the templates check for the presence of a reference for the wikidata value? Is there some
1024:
I've been thinking about this since I saw that you had posted it. Unlike
Pigsonthewing, I share your doubt of Wikidata, and I've certainly run across incorrect coordinates in other-language WPs as well. I imagine that a great number of geocoded articles in other languages are already geocoded here,
1219:
One problem is, many editors don't know about
Wikidata, and the newbies whom I teach find the very idea difficult. I mean, even the infobox itself is difficult to learn, since the Visual Editor is not very helpful. I hope this can be fixed by designing a more direct and obvious way to edit WD from
1094:
are set up to pull coordinates from
Wikidata by default; when I run across such, I've been leaving them alone if the coords look good but adding local coordinates if they need to be emended or otherwise adjusted (overprecise, a bit mislocated, etc.). They can be identified whenever an article is
1065:
coordinates are nowhere to be found in the body of the article, and there is no clear way to detect in edit logs that
Wikidata coordinates have changed, or simple user interface for correcting them if they're wrong. This seems to me to break the entire wiki principle that drives Knowledge (XXG).
1068:
What to do about this? I'd be happy with using
Wikidata coordinates in these if these problems could be fixed, but given the glacial rate of change in the Wikimedia software, I wouldn't hold out much hope of seeing this change. At least with mass-copying Wikidata to here, there's some chance of
1064:
I've noticed that some templates that use the Kartographer extension are pulling in coordinates from Wikidata by default. This is bad news, as it represents a slide toward treating Wikidata as the master source of geographic data without there being a robust system of editorial oversight; the
1215:
I'm pretty happy with the theory of Wikidata as the master source of geographic data. As with figures for land area, population, and other geographical numbers, this method has the advantage that the data can be entered once for all languages. The same WD coords go into various maps including
1423:
tags in articles about places whose "coordinates are restricted from public view with good reasons", but I fear that it might be applied indiscriminately. I also think that approximate coordinates could be useful in some cases, as hike395 and Mandruss have suggested.
952:
I'd welcome any comments other editors have on this. In particular, please let me know now if you have any objections to this plan; I don't want to waste my time implementing this only to for the addition of these coordinates to be rejected by the community. —
1576:
tags, will be on hiatus for a bit, due to hardware failure and lack of time to restore it to operation. Everything is backed up, so nothing is lost, and I will be bringing the service back up in due course, probably running on a cloud instance. —
1710:
I would say "definitely not". There is no reason to believe that a missing datum at wikidata means that it has to be missing. Also, it's hard to believe that the number of sites with confidential locations is too many for manual intervention.
1272:
251:
1628:
1101:
template in it. As you know by now, I don't think that indiscriminately pulling coordinates from Wikidata is a good idea, but I often feel like Dame Partington trying to push back the Atlantic with a mop.
880:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
41:
498:
745:
1084:
Could you give one or two examples of "templates that use the Kartographer extension"? (With my limited technical skills, I'm not sure what this means.) I've noticed that a few infoboxes, such as
505:
1679:
The actual question is, when coordinates are not present at Wikidata like for the article mentioned above, is it always the case that the address is restricted? In other words, when the item
755:
1310:). There seems to be some structure within them to be used to ease allocation (and perhaps as a sanity check), but that structure is not supposed to be used as data by end users. (See
488:
483:
1306:. GERS identifiers are opaque 128-bit handles intended to identify unique entities at any level within the hierarchy of a geographic data system, but don't seem to be UUIDs. (See
913:
I propose that we start importing coordinates from the following Wikipedias, all of which have more than 1 million articles, and have not had articles mass-created by LSJbot:
1730:
761:
712:
642:
612:
432:
126:
102:
1393:
An approximation (e.g., d° m') followed by a hidden comment would suffice. If an editor disregards the hidden comment, they would likely disregard this proposed tag. ―
724:
570:
493:
1379:) is to supply approximate coordinates, and highlight the fact that the coordinates are approximate. Barring coordinates entirely from an article seems excessive. —
728:
772:
685:
591:
942:
As part of this exercise. I plan first to generate lists of candidate coordinates from these that they can be assessed for quality before going any further.
523:
1740:
809:
750:
690:
1658:, the script mentioned in the thread above can add a template (probably should be created) to indicate that the article with restricted address (such as
789:
777:
1220:
the infobox, and the infobox by VE. Alas, this is likely to take years but when it happens, we can expect faster cleanup of those dirty mass imports.
805:
801:
797:
739:
1735:
767:
135:
in Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
663:
1134:
478:
1511:
templates, which are only specified as decimals to 4 dp, to no avail; is this something being done by the infobox? If so, it's grotesque. —
199:
187:
166:
793:
720:
708:
1659:
1009:
512:
891:
Discuss, summarise and specify a set of changes to geohack, such as type list revision, support for linear features, bug fixes, &c
785:
704:
1536:
to pull the overprecise coordinates from Wikidata. I've replaced that with coordinates given to four decimal places (copied from the
1241:
782:
516:
48:
886:
1655:
1640:
733:
716:
77:
1088:
698:
1600:
Parallel articles should have lists starting at 180th meridian, nor Prime meridian, to avoid splitting of Europe and Africa.
1662:, see the associated Wikidata item) can not have a coord template. The proposed template can prevent people from adding
857:
132:
1690:
property, but the property doesn't have coordinates data, should we place a template to indicate that there can't be a
1624:
1468:
Is it general WP policy that all articles on neighbourhoods, villages, towns, etc., should include their coordinates?
1240:
Hello. There is a discussion that might be of your interest and it would be great if you can provide your feedback at
400:
1116:
I've mentioned your concerns in WD chat. I think the people there are happy with their quality control in this area.
1303:
1715:
1704:
1644:
1612:
1586:
1551:
1520:
1495:
1477:
1455:
1433:
1408:
1388:
1361:
1332:
1284:
1257:
1229:
1202:
1188:
1161:
1146:
1128:
1111:
1078:
1053:
1034:
1013:
988:
962:
383:
379:
1673:
1346:
1295:
1193:
Fantastic. The syntax is a bit eye-watering, but I can see what's going on. This makes me feel a lot better. —
1443:
1152:
way in which this check can be done automatically and transparently as part of the value retrieval process? —
83:
1117:
1507:
1225:
1169:
1049:
1005:
837:
428:
1666:
1570:
1530:
535:
1267:
I have captured my experience about improving geodata accuracy on OSM and Wikidata and shared it through
198:
in Knowledge (XXG), and documents them in the article space. If you would like to participate, visit the
826:
1372:
1323:
We should probably follow this iniatiative and work out whether we should link our data with theirs. —
1684:
1175:
provides an example of how to retrieve only sourced values and allow local overrides in articles. See
1636:
1376:
1280:
1368:
1582:
1516:
1491:
1451:
1357:
1328:
1254:
1198:
1184:
1157:
1142:
1074:
984:
958:
1702:
1563:
1469:
1403:
1221:
1124:
1045:
996:
974:
385:
1318:
1384:
1268:
1473:
1137:. If there are infoboxes that do not comply with that RFC, their code should be adjusted. –
381:
237:
1133:
Information imported into infoboxes from Wikidata must have a reliable source in Wikidata,
945:
Yes, I know that in theory, Wikidata is the way to do this kind of cross-wiki syncing. But
833:
544:
is added to articles needing coordinates. This makes them available for the previous step.
1632:
1608:
1375:: we are here to supply information. One productive way (that came from the discussion at
1276:
1118:
https://www.wikidata.org/Wikidata:Project_chat#Pushback_at_using_WD_coordinates_in_enwiki
1542:
template in the infobox, since I myself have no idea exactly where the event occurred).
1311:
17:
1578:
1547:
1512:
1484:
1447:
1429:
1353:
1324:
1246:
1194:
1180:
1153:
1138:
1107:
1070:
1030:
980:
954:
906:
There are over 20,000 articles missing coordinates that have coordinates on Wikidata.
508:: verify and/or add coordinates to articles in categories likely to need coordinates.
31:
1724:
1712:
1697:
1394:
1120:
879:
Clean up / reduce redundancy in U.S. city articles (rambot/smackbot generated), see
1439:
1380:
993:
Though I think your concerns about Wikidata are unfounded, I support this import.
1069:
editorial oversight; this is worse that a mass import, because it's invisible. —
195:
1604:
1307:
1543:
1425:
1242:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Maps#Feedback requested for innovation made
1103:
1026:
970:
865:
114:
96:
1483:
Policy, no; recommendation, yes. If it's a fixed point, it has coords. --
861:
853:
Extend NASA World Wind support to include layers (by type) and labels.
874:
Identify special formats not yet converted, e.g. E12 23 54 N23 34 52
1629:
Category:Articles missing coordinates with coordinates on Wikidata
1317:
They also define more structured metadata types, such as places:
1414:
1627:
is now a thing - it helps with adding coordinates to pages in
414:
386:
231:
59:
26:
843:
Make better examples, also showing use of decimals and scale.
1319:
https://docs.overturemaps.org/schema/reference/places/place/
1299:
1603:
French overseas deps should have their own flags used. --
887:
mw:Summer of Code 2009#MediaWiki core and new extensions
902:
RFC: importing coordinates from other language editions
554:
489:
Category:Articles missing geocoordinate data by subject
484:
Category:Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
456:
450:
444:
438:
1312:
https://github.com/OvertureMaps/schema/discussions/27
433:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Geographical coordinates
141:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Geographical coordinates
979:I'd be interested to hear your comments on this. —
860:linked from many coordinates. Related articles:
524:Knowledge (XXG):Obtaining geographic coordinates
1650:Seeking guidance for a feature in coordInserter
1413:Re U.S. locations: I've seen cases in which an
1275:. Let me know your feedback or your questions.
76:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1263:Improving geodata accuracy on OSM and Wikidata
686:Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags
394:This page has archives. Sections older than
144:Template:WikiProject Geographical coordinates
8:
848:other planets and the moon and probably also
1731:WikiProject Geographical coordinates pages
1596:I have two suggestions regarding to them.
1308:https://docs.overturemaps.org/guides/gers/
160:
91:
1623:Just letting anyone interested know that
643:Coordinates templates needing maintenance
613:Talk pages requiring geodata verification
511:Articles are also listed on WolterBot's
208:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Microformats
571:Articles requiring geodata verification
555:
499:Concentration camps needing coordinates
162:
93:
1741:Knowledge (XXG) pages with to-do lists
1236:Feedback requested for innovation made
1176:
910:effectively curated by human beings.
668:
647:
617:
596:
575:
404:when more than 6 sections are present.
1302:) have created a new identifier, the
1095:displaying coords but doesn't have a
552:As of September 21, 2024 09:52 (UTC)
479:Category:Articles needing coordinates
194:, which encourages the deployment of
7:
1060:Kartographer, infoboxes and Wikidata
592:Pages requiring geodata verification
180:WikiProject Geographical coordinates
127:WikiProject Geographical coordinates
121:WikiProject Geographical coordinates
65:
63:
38:WikiProject Geographical coordinates
1660:Anderson Site (Franklin, Tennessee)
1566:, which geocodes articles and adds
871:Convert existing data to templates
82:It is of interest to the following
1342:I suggest a new coord family tag,
25:
1179:in that template, for example. –
1135:per the 2018 Wikidata infobox RFC
517:User:WolterBot/Cleanup statistics
398:may be automatically archived by
211:Template:WikiProject Microformats
147:Geographical coordinates articles
529:Tag articles needing coordinates
422:
236:
113:
95:
64:
30:
1273:a long form article on OSM wiki
182:is part of, or of interest to,
1736:WikiProject Microformats pages
1592:Parallel and meridian articles
1304:Global Entity Reference System
1290:Global Entity Reference System
938:Portuguese 1,107,000+ articles
885:Suggestions for extensions at
703:Replace links in articles to:
699:Category:ParserFunction errors
131:, which encourages the use of
1:
1716:12:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
1705:05:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
1645:23:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1613:06:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1203:14:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
1189:13:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
1162:08:24, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
1054:01:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
1035:18:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
1014:18:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
989:09:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
963:17:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
932:Japanese: 1,384,000+ articles
822:Provide advice on the use of
664:Coord template needing repair
1367:Is that consistent with the
1230:01:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
1147:16:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
1129:16:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
1112:16:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
1079:15:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
858:Geographic coordinate system
1625:User:Jeeputer/coordInserter
1587:20:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
1369:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)?
935:Chinese 1,373,000+ articles
929:Italian 1,823,000+ articles
926:Spanish 1,886,000+ articles
923:Russian 1,933,000+ articles
1757:
1552:23:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1521:22:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
1496:08:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1478:04:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1333:10:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
1285:11:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
1258:01:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
920:French 2,546,000+ articles
917:German 2,828,000+ articles
1656:discussed on my talk page
1371:. Knowledge (XXG) is not
1300:https://overturemaps.org/
669:no pages or subcategories
648:no pages or subcategories
618:no pages or subcategories
597:no pages or subcategories
576:no pages or subcategories
172:
108:
90:
1654:Hi. As Suntooooth and I
1442:that Knowledge (XXG) is
1296:Overture Maps Foundation
188:WikiProject Microformats
138:Geographical coordinates
133:geographical coordinates
103:Geographical coordinates
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:GEO
1508:2024 Southport stabbing
1456:11:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
1434:22:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
1409:19:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
1389:18:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
1362:09:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
838:Keyhole Markup Language
1696:template on the page?
1562:Just to let you know,
1558:The Anomebot2 downtime
1526:The infobox was using
1269:a short OSM user diary
561:User reported errors:
401:Lowercase sigmabot III
1089:Infobox power station
846:Add an attribute for
691:Check coord templates
214:Microformats articles
1685:coordinate location
1539:{{OSM Location map}}
1377:Talk:Hyperion (tree)
856:Rewrite the article
473:Find coordinates for
43:a WikiProject Report
1338:"coord restricted"?
633:Formatting errors:
1676:or an Editnotice.
1464:Coordinates policy
462:Updated 2022-04-18
123:is of interest to
78:content assessment
1688:
1420:{{coord missing}}
899:
898:
682:
681:
631:
630:
408:
407:
230:
229:
226:
225:
222:
221:
159:
158:
155:
154:
56:
55:
16:(Redirected from
1748:
1700:
1695:
1694:
1686:
1672:again through a
1671:
1665:
1575:
1569:
1541:
1540:
1535:
1529:
1487:
1422:
1421:
1406:
1401:
1351:
1347:coord restricted
1345:
1253:
1251:
1178:
1174:
1168:
1100:
1099:
1093:
1087:
1012:
1003:
999:
978:
836:page. KML means
831:
825:
636:
635:
564:
563:
559:
557:
543:
513:cleanup listings
463:
426:
425:
415:
403:
387:
240:
232:
216:
215:
212:
209:
206:
191:
190:
174:
173:
161:
149:
148:
145:
142:
139:
117:
110:
109:
99:
92:
69:
68:
67:
60:
40:was featured in
34:
27:
21:
1756:
1755:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1721:
1720:
1698:
1692:
1691:
1674:Preview warning
1669:
1663:
1652:
1621:
1594:
1573:
1567:
1560:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1527:
1504:
1485:
1466:
1419:
1418:
1404:
1395:
1349:
1343:
1340:
1294:I see that the
1292:
1265:
1247:
1245:
1238:
1177:|official_name=
1172:
1166:
1097:
1096:
1091:
1085:
1062:
1001:
995:
994:
968:
904:
895:
894:
881:past discussion
849:
829:
823:
819:
762:Terraserver-USA
673:
672:
671:
666:
652:
651:
650:
645:
622:
621:
620:
615:
601:
600:
599:
594:
580:
579:
578:
573:
553:
550:
533:
531:
475:
437:
423:
413:
399:
388:
382:
245:
213:
210:
207:
204:
203:
186:
185:
146:
143:
140:
137:
136:
52:on 27 May 2013.
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1754:
1752:
1744:
1743:
1738:
1733:
1723:
1722:
1719:
1718:
1651:
1648:
1620:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1601:
1593:
1590:
1559:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1503:
1502:What the fuck?
1500:
1499:
1498:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1444:WP:NOTCENSORED
1411:
1391:
1339:
1336:
1291:
1288:
1264:
1261:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1170:Infobox bridge
1114:
1061:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
940:
939:
936:
933:
930:
927:
924:
921:
918:
903:
900:
897:
896:
893:
892:
889:
883:
877:
876:
875:
869:
854:
851:
847:
844:
841:
818:
815:
814:
813:
701:
688:
680:
679:
678:
677:
667:
662:
661:
660:
658:
657:
656:
646:
641:
640:
639:
629:
628:
627:
626:
616:
611:
610:
609:
607:
606:
605:
595:
590:
589:
588:
586:
585:
584:
574:
569:
568:
567:
560:
549:
546:
530:
527:
502:
501:
496:
491:
486:
481:
474:
471:
469:
465:
420:
418:
412:
409:
406:
405:
393:
390:
389:
384:
380:
378:
375:
374:
333:
293:
247:
246:
241:
235:
228:
227:
224:
223:
220:
219:
217:
177:
170:
169:
164:
157:
156:
153:
152:
150:
118:
106:
105:
100:
88:
87:
81:
70:
54:
53:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1753:
1742:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1732:
1729:
1728:
1726:
1717:
1714:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1689:
1682:
1677:
1675:
1668:
1667:coord missing
1661:
1657:
1649:
1647:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1591:
1589:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1572:
1571:coord missing
1565:
1564:The Anomebot2
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1532:
1531:Wikidatacoord
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1463:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1438:I agree with
1437:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1416:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1402:
1400:
1399:
1392:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1348:
1337:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1321:
1320:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1256:
1252:
1250:
1244:. Sincerely,
1243:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1222:Jim.henderson
1218:
1214:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1171:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1119:
1115:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1090:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1066:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:Jim.henderson
1042:
1041:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1002:Pigsonthewing
998:
992:
991:
990:
986:
982:
976:
975:Pigsonthewing
972:
967:
966:
965:
964:
960:
956:
950:
948:
943:
937:
934:
931:
928:
925:
922:
919:
916:
915:
914:
911:
907:
901:
890:
888:
884:
882:
878:
873:
872:
870:
867:
863:
859:
855:
852:
845:
842:
839:
835:
828:
821:
820:
816:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
784:
780:
779:
774:
770:
769:
768:Virtual Earth
764:
763:
758:
757:
752:
748:
747:
742:
741:
736:
735:
730:
726:
722:
718:
715:, Microsoft (
714:
710:
706:
702:
700:
696:
692:
689:
687:
684:
683:
675:
674:
670:
665:
659:
654:
653:
649:
644:
638:
637:
634:
624:
623:
619:
614:
608:
603:
602:
598:
593:
587:
582:
581:
577:
572:
566:
565:
562:
558:
547:
545:
541:
537:
536:coord missing
528:
526:
525:
520:
518:
514:
509:
507:
506:Maybe-Checker
500:
497:
495:
494:Observatories
492:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
476:
472:
470:
467:
464:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
436:
434:
430:
419:
417:
416:
410:
402:
397:
392:
391:
377:
376:
373:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
249:
248:
244:
239:
234:
233:
218:
201:
197:
193:
192:
189:
181:
178:
176:
175:
171:
168:
165:
163:
151:
134:
130:
129:
128:
122:
119:
116:
112:
111:
107:
104:
101:
98:
94:
89:
85:
79:
75:
71:
62:
61:
58:
51:
50:
45:
44:
39:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1680:
1678:
1653:
1622:
1595:
1561:
1506:The article
1505:
1467:
1397:
1396:
1341:
1322:
1316:
1293:
1266:
1248:
1239:
1067:
1063:
1010:Andy's edits
1006:Talk to Andy
997:Andy Mabbett
951:
946:
944:
941:
912:
908:
905:
827:Attached KML
776:
766:
760:
754:
744:
738:
732:
694:
632:
551:
540:country name
539:
532:
521:
510:
503:
468:
466:
459:
453:
447:
441:
427:
421:
395:
250:
242:
205:Microformats
200:project page
196:microformats
184:
183:
179:
167:Microformats
125:
124:
120:
84:WikiProjects
74:project page
73:
57:
47:
42:
37:
947:in practice
840:, using XML
790:Google Maps
786:Yahoo! Maps
756:Terraserver
705:ACME Mapper
1725:Categories
1633:Suntooooth
1619:New script
1277:Arjunaraoc
850:star maps.
711:(spammy),
693:among the
522:See also:
429:To-do list
1693:{{coord}}
1635:, it/he (
1579:The Anome
1513:The Anome
1448:The Anome
1354:The Anome
1325:The Anome
1271:and also
1249:Thinker78
1195:The Anome
1181:Jonesey95
1154:The Anome
1139:Jonesey95
1098:{{coord}}
1071:The Anome
981:The Anome
955:The Anome
866:longitude
783:Wikimapia
773:TopoQuest
746:Encarta 2
740:Encarta 1
709:Maplandia
697:pages in
1699:Jeeputer
1641:contribs
1398:Mandruss
1373:censored
1121:Vicarage
862:latitude
778:TopoZone
713:MapQuest
396:270 days
243:Archives
49:Signpost
1440:hike395
1381:hike395
832:on the
676:0 pages
655:0 pages
625:0 pages
604:0 pages
583:0 pages
556:Refresh
457:refresh
445:history
46:in the
1687:(P625)
1488:rose64
1470:Mcljlm
1255:(talk)
834:WP:GEO
788:, and
729:Live 2
725:Live 1
721:Bing 2
717:Bing 1
80:scale.
1605:40bus
794:Local
451:watch
411:To do
252:Index
72:This
1713:Zero
1637:talk
1609:talk
1583:talk
1548:talk
1544:Deor
1517:talk
1492:talk
1490:🌹 (
1474:talk
1452:talk
1430:talk
1426:Deor
1415:NRHP
1385:talk
1358:talk
1329:talk
1281:talk
1226:talk
1199:talk
1185:talk
1158:talk
1143:talk
1125:talk
1108:talk
1104:Deor
1075:talk
1050:talk
1031:talk
1027:Deor
985:talk
973:and
971:Deor
959:talk
817:More
504:Use
439:edit
431:for
1681:has
1486:Red
1004:);
771:),
751:MSR
734:MSN
548:Fix
1727::
1683:a
1670:}}
1664:{{
1643:)
1631:.
1611:)
1585:)
1574:}}
1568:{{
1550:)
1534:}}
1528:{{
1519:)
1494:)
1476:)
1454:)
1432:)
1387:)
1360:)
1350:}}
1344:{{
1331:)
1314:)
1283:)
1228:)
1201:)
1187:)
1173:}}
1167:{{
1160:)
1145:)
1127:)
1110:)
1092:}}
1086:{{
1077:)
1052:)
1033:)
1008:;
987:)
961:)
864:,
830:}}
824:{{
810:UK
808:,
806:NL
804:,
802:FR
800:,
798:DE
796:,
781:,
775:,
765:,
759:,
753:,
749:,
743:,
737:,
731:,
727:,
723:,
719:,
707:,
695:39
542:}}
534:{{
519:)
371:30
369:,
367:29
365:,
363:28
361:,
359:27
357:,
355:26
353:,
351:25
349:,
347:24
345:,
343:23
341:,
339:22
337:,
335:21
331:20
329:,
327:19
325:,
323:18
321:,
319:17
317:,
315:16
313:,
311:15
309:,
307:14
305:,
303:13
301:,
299:12
297:,
295:11
291:10
289:,
285:,
281:,
277:,
273:,
269:,
265:,
261:,
257:,
1639:/
1607:(
1581:(
1546:(
1515:(
1472:(
1450:(
1428:(
1405:☎
1383:(
1356:(
1327:(
1298:(
1279:(
1224:(
1197:(
1183:(
1156:(
1141:(
1123:(
1106:(
1073:(
1048:(
1029:(
1000:(
983:(
977::
969:@
957:(
868:.
812:)
792:(
538:|
515:(
460:·
454:·
448:·
442:·
435::
287:9
283:8
279:7
275:6
271:5
267:4
263:3
259:2
255:1
202:.
86::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
