316:
Knowledge has very little in the way of a formal power structure; most enforcement of its rules is done by ordinary users, making ordinary edits; people agree that they should be enforcing by general agreement among
Knowledge's editors – and apply methods that usually work derived from the principles
280:
Please investigate something 'cause the editors
Hurricane Hink and Scarian on Knowledge are blocking certain names saying that we're making sock puppets and vandalizing Knowledge when in fact we're not! Something must get done about Knowledge editors should they threaten blocking us and we mean
215:
This page is nice because it's okay for it to look incomplete or ugly, and I'm not going to pull a BRD on the core policy of thousands of
Wikipedians after being here for, what, four days? So I'm putting my 'dream version', the current one at least, here for comment.
281:
urgently! I cannot stand being intimidated by
Knowledge editors like Hurricane Hink and Scarian and others similar! Neither can my partners! These Knowledge editors scare us, demanding sources while it's difficult to provide the actual sources! Please help us!
312:
Despite the good faith and good will in general of our contributors still disputes are common. Standing agreements that are subject to constant re-evaluation help to unify
Knowledge's editors in their quest to build the gargantuan 💕 that is Knowledge.
146:
Actually, I wonder if you now would agree (Until 1 == 2), that having a
Workshop for experimenting is worthwhile, if it means that experiments are not made willy-nilly at Ignore all rules itself, and so that page doesn;t have to get protected so often?
199:
Disagree, we are discussing now. Anyone who closely reads talk:IAR will find this page, I have "advertised" it extensively there. Edits to the page, just wait, see my reply at talk:Iar. Kim, you surprise me, you can be so negative sometimes.
166:
Though I really don't get why people don't just use the policy talk page to suggest things, if an idea gets merit then this subpage is a fine idea to hone it, but it really does not get the attention the actual talk page gets.
317:
that guide the entire venture. This does have wide support and there can be support for applying it in a specific case if the community coalesces. Editors however are always free to consider news ways of doing things.
49:
184:
I don't edit here, because this is a "dead" page. It is unlikely the community is even aware of its existence, and any edits to it are not going to lead to any useful discussion. --
108:
You asked on the IAR talk page why nobody was editing this page. It could be that there is not much desire to change the current version, thus the workshop is not needed.
221:
84:
217:
90:
34:
17:
30:
264:
79:
70:
129:
You mean me? I just put up the last UGLY version from WP:IAR. But, whatever, it is a /workshop, update as necessary!
255:
Oh, good idea, that will keep everything together. I modified your clarification notice a little, by the way. --
323:
297:
205:
152:
134:
256:
245:
189:
168:
112:
163:
Sure. That is what I meant to convey in my third sentence from my post of 15:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC).
111:
However this is a good place to draft suggested changes before presenting them on the IAR talk page.
328:
301:
269:
249:
225:
208:
193:
179:
155:
137:
123:
60:
237:
75:
319:
293:
201:
148:
130:
56:
241:
185:
289:
236:
If no-one has any objections, tomorrow I will change this to a redirect to
25:
288:
There's no way around it, unfortunately. Knowledge has a
8:
284:mcmlxxxviii 13:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
7:
33:for discussing improvements to the
24:
50:Click here to start a new topic.
18:Knowledge talk:Ignore all rules
1:
329:11:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
47:Put new text under old text.
55:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
344:
302:18:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
270:18:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
250:17:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
226:18:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
209:02:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
194:00:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
180:04:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
156:04:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
138:00:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
124:15:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
85:Be welcoming to newcomers
35:Ignore all rules/Workshop
308:Why are there any rules?
80:avoid personal attacks
276:Unnecessary Blocking
91:dispute resolution
52:
327:
177:
121:
101:
100:
71:Assume good faith
48:
335:
318:
267:
262:
175:
169:
119:
113:
26:
343:
342:
338:
337:
336:
334:
333:
332:
310:
290:sources or GTFO
278:
265:
260:
257:
234:
176:
171:
120:
115:
106:
97:
96:
66:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
341:
339:
309:
306:
305:
304:
277:
274:
273:
272:
258:
233:
230:
229:
228:
212:
211:
170:
161:
160:
159:
158:
141:
140:
114:
105:
102:
99:
98:
95:
94:
87:
82:
73:
67:
65:
64:
53:
44:
43:
40:
39:
38:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
340:
331:
330:
325:
321:
314:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
282:
275:
271:
268:
263:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
213:
210:
207:
203:
198:
197:
196:
195:
191:
187:
182:
181:
178:
174:
164:
157:
154:
150:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
136:
132:
128:
127:
126:
125:
122:
118:
109:
103:
92:
88:
86:
83:
81:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
62:
58:
57:Learn to edit
54:
51:
46:
45:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
27:
19:
315:
311:
294:Father Goose
283:
279:
259:tiny plastic
235:
202:Newbyguesses
183:
172:
165:
162:
149:Newbyguesses
131:Newbyguesses
116:
110:
107:
29:This is the
261:Grey Knight
242:microchip08
218:69.49.44.11
186:Kim Bruning
104:Discussion
292:policy.--
93:if needed
76:Be polite
37:redirect.
31:talk page
232:Redirect
173:(1 == 2)
117:(1 == 2)
61:get help
320:NewbyG
238:WT:IAR
89:Seek
16:<
324:talk
298:talk
246:talk
222:talk
206:Talk
190:talk
153:Talk
135:Talk
78:and
300:)
248:)
240:.
224:)
204:-
192:)
151:-
133:-
59:;
326:)
322:(
296:(
266:⊖
244:(
220:(
188:(
63:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.