Knowledge (XXG) talk:In the news/Recurring items/Archive 8

1804:

statistical measurement, the NCAA tournament is easily the #2 sporting event in the U.S. after the NFL playoffs and Super Bowl, definately more popular and generating more interest than the NBA finals, but everytime it gets proposed for ITN (not ITNR, just each year at ITN), we get the flood of "zOMG oppose, amateur event!!!" and it dies on the vine, almost unilaterally from people who have no exposure to the event. And every year, I drag out the statistics from Neilsen, the polls regarding popularity, all the data I could possibly pile on, and people ignore that and say "It's amateur, so it doesn't count" or something like that. So, yeah, in a perfect world, based on the data and interest level the NCAA tournament should be on ITNR. That's proof positive this isn't a perfect world. --

437:

interpretation are perfectly welcome at ITN/C, but their notability will need to argued for. Obviously, margin of beating previous record, longevity of previous record, and profile of the event will add weight to the argument in favour of adding the occasion to the template, but if those features are needed to persuade the community to give consensus to the importance of the event, then the importance of the event cannot be taken for granted. And the current discussion proves that, under some circumstances, such as occurring within the midst of dozens of world records being broken, even these features do not guarantee such an overwhelming consensus of importance that it can be considered a certainty that that consensus will be forthcoming.

655:. This criteria has seemingly become an excuse for editors not to bother researching the subject of athletics before commenting on it at ITN/C. That's the only way you can explain how something like the women's 4*4 relay is ultimately considered more notable than David Rudisha's 800m run. It also quite ridiculously gives people a completely lame excuse to oppose events that are justifiable on media coverage alone, such as Bolt's double, based on the non-argument that it wasn't a world record. Get back to basics - if people want to oppose items based on their topic ignorance alone, or worse, their palpable dislike of athletics period, they need to be made to make that argument from first principles. 4702:. I don't know whether anyone else has noticed, but recently the benchmark for posting to ITN has been creeping upward, and its not healthy. Our top story at the moment is four days old (bear in mind that our target is to post something every 12 hours), and that's getting pretty normal. It hardly seems worth nominating anything at the moment, because if it's not something that someone else will inevitably nominate if you don't, then it stands no chance of getting consensus. In that context, an perfectly postable ITNR story may be the only realistic chance of getting something posted until...who knows when? so I don't see what the benefit of removing it would be. 3931:. EPL has to be the most followed league in any sport in the world, and La Liga has increased its prominence in English speaking media lately so there's no reason for ditching one to add the other. Undecided on Serie A and Bundesliga though, as a previous discussion here has produced a "consensus" that we're not considering "that much" the "highest level of the sport" argument, at least when compared to interest. Plus, I think (their respective season articles' infoboxes don't mention the start and end dates, which is like major fail) the EPL and La Liga end at somewhat different times of the year so we wouldn't be barraged with soccer blurbs. – 4643:, obviously because of them pair, newsworthy material, not helped that it is at the bottom of the page as "Other News" - go to show how unless it is the motoring press, how news editors treat the event. Going back to headlines, the usual UK lot, Armstrong, Australian Open, football, football and football and of course F1 because McLaren made a minor cock up. This tells you how much news editors think the general public give a damn about the rally. I challenge you to go ask the general public and hold a conversation with them about this year's rally yourself, trust me, I tried to hold conversations with them before and do they give a damn? 1739:, a highly popular event in one part of the world is not extremely popular in the rest of the world (maybe the NCAA tournament is a bad example of this compared to the All-Irish championship, but you get my idea). However, just because I believe that it should be taken off of ITN/R, simply removing it from ITN/R should not stop its nomination and possible posting if the consensus is there for future tournaments. I did support it's posting onto ITN because of it's popularity in Ireland. I believe that ITN/R should be reserved for sporting events that are no-brainers in terms of posting ( 4762:) to remain at ITN/R while the legendary Dakar Rally winner (for a few days every year at ITN) is considered no longer notable. Again, no definitive indication of notability but Dakar rally gets over 30 million Google hits, the Struga poetry evenings gets fewer than 100k. I'm not sure I understand if there's even a rationale for removal of the rally from ITN beyond not liking it. It's a multinational event which draws competitors from around the globe to an endurance event which is pretty challenging and, many years, death-defying. 3982:

succession, there will be calls from non-football fans for us to post fewer competitions. While I would disagree with those calls, they would be understandable and would garner significant support. Given that the Premier League will be posted whether it's ITNR or not (much like the Super Bowl, Stanley Cup or World Series), it belongs on ITNR in the interests of saving time. Rightly or wrongly, La Liga does not fall into that same category, and therefore that is the one which should apply for year-by-year consensus. —

331:. The controversy over the relay nomination has only really happened because it has come in the context of the Olympics, so I don't think it necessarily shows a lack of support for inclusion in ITNR generally. It's perfectly conceivable that we could make an exception but retain the rule. I do agree though, that the wording is very much open to interpretation, so that most discussions will effectively boil down to a normal ITNC discussion. So, unless the wording can be improved, why not just leave it to ITNC? 5034:

Knowledge (XXG) if we could agree that a few items of a similar subject could stay at ITN/R. Let's not forget, ITN has become stale as month-old bread lately, the voting process has become divisive and unconstructive, if we could find some basic "elements" of ITN once again, including mass-interest items like this or the Daytona 500, or any other such article, let's get on with it, nominate it for ITN/R and move on. P.S. I didn't mention it, but others should, you do know that

417:

interpretation anyway. If there were no INTR listing for world records, the 4x100 world record would have been nominated anyway, and we would have no established criteria to judge it by, only wildly subjective and sometimes nationalist opinions posted by editors at the spur of the moment. In short, you would take something that is 'vague and unspecific' and make it even more vague and unspecific. Judging what merits ITN posting is far to vague as it is. --

35: 460:, as I think the criteria are useful and as I said ITN needs more criteria not less. I imagine it was put in ITNR alongside other sports items because it was topically related, which makes sense. So I think it's best just to leave it there. As you said, there are many records being broken and the current wording on records clearly notes what to consider when deciding which records are notable enough. I think that's worth keeping.-- 3908:- I really don't think we have too many football articles. I'm not fan myself, but I think it's really good and important that we cover culturally-significant activities as well as the usual news diet of war, politics and death. And as football is the world's most popular sport, and has demonstrated that it is an enduring cultural phenomenon with wider relevance, I think it's sensible that we should report on it. 2361:

in different types of football from around the world (American football, Australian rules football, Canadian football, Rugby Union football, Rugby League football, Association football, and Gaelic football). We do this not to inform our readers about the scores of games or sports they may be following, but to generate interest in a wide variety of articles and to show the depth of our encyclopaedia. --

5167:

entries which form it - for example, I note that my nomination at the top of this article earlier today has been archived without an admin's decision on it. We can't allow this to happen every time. We need to make these decisions quickly and decisively. There's very good reasons to have ITN/R, but it's broken, and I suspect it'll collapse around us if we don't do something

384:

line. Amending the line would only widen the net so far that ITN would become ITN&S with a month, with sports fans eager to push every measurement they can into the front page (and that's not exactly manageable as it is). If the consequence of removal is to give world records the same status as non-ITN/R nominees, so be it. If it's good enough, it can be argued for.

2165:? There was one oppose by someone that said "who cares" - and then had to have it explained to them that this was nothing to do with soccer!! Much like the attempts here to compare it to soccer in Singapore. If there is such a thing as "Singaporean football" - or a sport that originated in Singapore that the rest of the world might not know much about - someone who 4796:

ensure the updates are made correctly and that the article is of sufficient quality, regardless of whether it's a recurring ITNer or not. Providing a quality update is made, there's no good reason not to feature this historical race every year. Just because this year's discussion may not support it, who can say who would be delighted to see it in years to come.

4509:

goes, all goes" when discussions have been so fairly in favour of retention after an open and fair discussion. It's my view that ITN/R needs reform, major reform, and that might mean throwing the whole thing open to a project-wide debate. For now, we do things piecemeal and that doesn't mean you can suggest massive deletions based on a personal prejudice

5072:

attitudes of a lot of the people at ITN/C, let alone here. Now Kevin McE has posited that an ITN/R which has been opposed should be dropped from ITN/R. In which case, there seems no point whatsoever in ITN/R if each and every year, an ITN/R item has to be fought for to be included on the main page. My suggestion right now? Delete ITN/R.

191:

November, whereas Bolt's victory is likely to resonate for years to come. By comparison last year's New York City marathon article, an ITN, was viewed by a peak of around 27,500 whereas this years 100 Metres Final had a peak readership of around 51,000. The idea that it's just another race amongst hundreds of others just doesn't hold water.

1772:

several other places. In the case of NCAA basketball, it has even a smaller profile than the Super Bowl elsewhere, but there's still significant live TV coverage elsewhere such as in Canada, Australia and the Philippines. There's this impression that it's an "under-xx" tournament, but AFAIK, there's no age restriction here. And

801:. The Norwegian government has created two prizes to complement the Nobel prizes, namely the Abel Prize and the Holberg Prize. There are currently multiple prizes on ITN/R for the sciences and mathematics, but no prizes for the social sciences, humanities or law. There is only one Holberg Prize awarded each year. 363:

long standing is a long standing record? As for highly publicised events that are one the same level as the 100m, just how many are there? It appears to me that there are very few records that are in the same league. In fact the only one I can think of that could fit the bill would be the land speed record.

1243:

at ITN/C on its own merits, that's fine, but I don't see that the confident assumption of consensus on importance is applicable here (and I suspect that the same could be said of many of the sports events listed here, which should probably be tested at some time, but that is not relevant to this discussion).

2105:

page views rugby articles get; they aren't the All-Ireland Senior Football Championship and that's all that's being debated here. Look at it in a vacuum and make a decision based on how you feel a high-level competition in a narrow field should be treated rather than trying to compare it to X, Y or Z.

4848:

But if serious doubt is cast on that assumption, inclusion at ITN/R is invalid. The only items that should be here are those for which very little, or no, serious opposition on importance grounds could be envisaged, and if such weak opposition is envisaged, the items can just as easily be allowed to

4581:

It may be top tier only in January (because it is the motorsport off season as everybody is developing cars for the forthcoming season) but is it on TV a lot, no (and understandably as highlights); is it backpage news (in comparison to F1, MotoGP, and WSB), no; do you hear the average Joe Public talk

4462:

be logically obligated to support ITN/R listing of "top tier tournament" results in major classifications of other sports. Is that your position? If not, is the reason that you believe that motor sport should be treated differently, or that your argument is not based on "it's a top tier tournament"?

4461:

No. Your grounds for including the Dakar Rally, and you are confident enough in the grounds to make it a strong keep !vote, is "it's a top tier tournament in a major motorsport classification." Assuming that you don't believe that motor sport should be treated differently to other sports, you would

4428:

The relevant point here is that being top level event in a sport is not grounds for listing on ITN/R. Saying that it should be included because it is top level of one classification of one particular type of event within a sport falls well short of the grounds for ITN/R inclusion. I illustrated the

4004:

Actually, if we were to give baseball the same treatment being proposed here for football, we would post the American League champions, the National League Champions, the world series, and possibly the MLB MVP. Of course, my friends across the pond would crap their pants at that amount of "US centric

2360:

We are an encyclopaedia. Not a news outlet. The purpose of ITN is not to supply news but to further the educational goal of this project by linking to a broad range of articles and topical areas on current event. One angle through which ITN does that is by posting the results of the major tournaments

2104:

How about, for a novel idea, letting a discussion stand on its own merits rather than trying to hang it on the frame of another item? Without comparing it to any other event, do you feel this particular event should be on ITN/R? It doesn't matter how many more people watch the NCAA finals or how many

1242:

I'm not quite sure what NFOOTY or chess have to do with this. I note that the word Venice, in the search box for the ITN/R talk archive, has no results, which suggests that it was added with no discussion. I have nothing against the Venice festival, and if it is proposed and supported in the future

383:

I was dubious about accepting any world record nominations which currently sit in ITN/C and I fully support removal of that line from ITN/R. It seems highly dubious - arbitrary, to be polite - to suggest athletics world records as the only valid nomination, as that is the implication from the current

362:

As a framing for debate on records, similar to what we have on deaths for instance, they would be fine, but they are not something that can be definitively asserted although the tendency will always be for the nominator to portray them as such. As others have noted, how large is a large margin? How

280:

What other sports are sufficiently like athletics or aquatics? How large a margin is unusual? How long is a very long time? How much media attention determines a very highly publicised event? If inclusion in ITN/R is to state that there is no question about the event's notability, then there can be

175:

Given that inclusion at ITN/R is intended to be restricted to items for which it can be assumed that the notability element of passing ITN/C, and given that the event proposed has just failed to gain consent at ITN/C on the basis of notability (in the context of the vast number of events that make up

155:

to the ITN/R list. Other than the opening and closing ceremonies this is the marquee event for the Olympics. This is one of the most viewed sports events in the world, if not the most viewed, with truly international interest. The estimated global audience for Usain Bolt's victory last Sunday was two

5213:

My impression (not just from this discussion) is that there is significant support for wiping the slate clean at ITN/R – not getting rid of it – but blanking the page, and re-adding things one-by-one, discussing them where there is doubt. Unless there is some sort of indication that I have misjudged

4810:

My comment about not needing to be discussed was in the context of importance "so self evidently important that it need not even be discussed". I repeat (and slightly rephrase and re-emphasise) the question that you evaded: Given that support for the importance of the 2013 rally is clearly lacking

4508:

I ask the same question. IP98 - look at the top of the page, and elsewhere, when individual items have gone through the removal process and they've been retained. You can't say "one goes, they all go", because that's not how Knowledge (XXG) works, as you well know, but furthermore you can't say "one

4278:

unless the current discussion at ITN/C takes a very different turn. Per my previous comments on the Venice festival and All Ireland Football: response at ITN/C shows that support is not so overwhelming that it can be assumed. ITN/R should not be a tail that wags the ITN/C dog: it should serve ITN/C

3396:

And I do think so. Neither of us can judge what the "typical reader" of a global website is interested in; non-American football fans will be disinterested in the Super Bowl; non-UK citizens won't be interested in their Royal Family, etc. I happen to think this subject is something that all people

3264:

Paparazzi photographs are for better or worse a normal part of society and not unusual, while doing something the vast overwhelming majority of people won't do("being old") is very unusual. Apples and oranges. If the world's oldest person can't be in the deaths ticker then I don't know who could be.

2778:

sports sections are behind the paywall. With that said, Gaelic games doesn't seem to be important as it's not on its sports menu section. As for the NY Times, the only in depth coverage in the first page was the story about an owner of an Irish pub broadcasting the games; the rest were mere mentions

2327:

of the audience share; the countries ranked 8th-30th are separated by 0.6%, between 1.1% and 0.5% (lol). Germany doesn't have an ITNR event either. India has the IPL already, and as for Brazil, the language barrier might be a factor but there many fine Brazilian articles there has to be a few people

1916:

Sure, when people stop objecting to including the NCAA tournament at ITN for spurious and irrelevent reasons. The day that happens is the day that it stops being an issue. For the record, I supported and still do the inclusion of the Gaelic Football championship. It's clearly something the newsmedia

1550:

While I echo the sentiment that non-Anglophone stories need to be given a fairer shake; Binchy's death was eventually given a small mention on ITN after much grouching from myself about the double standard shown at that time. I think the current proposal needs to make it clear how important it is or

1279:

While I cannot vouch for others, I am by no means trying to change any balance further towards sports, and I do not appreciate the implicit accusation (I have an interest in sport therefore I seek to make ITN/R more sport-orientated; that is by no means true and you will find many more comments from

1199:

is a far more blatant, disgusting and problematic misuse of a guideline), the Venice film festival is commonly seen as the second most prestigious one behind Cannes. There is an argument that on a global basis Venice is seen as being an equal of Cannes, given that English-speaking films historically

1083:

I agree with Kevin McE here - the general rule is to see if it can pass at ITN/C first. IF so there is something to consider. Regardless, one expression of support and three days simply isn't enough to start adding things to the list. Consider that even a deletion discussion runs for a full seven

111:

Are there any African or Latam awards shows that are big amongst the continent? We have Europe, USA, Inda and it seems little biased to only have that. Perhaps the Nigerian awards (biggest film industry in Africa) or a pan-African award can be ITNR. Ditto for razil/Mexico (presumably the biggest) ro

4638:

Looked at front of the New York Times sports section, nothing in its front page: Lance Armstrong-Oprah interview; NHL, NFL playoffs, Australian Open. There is that even but only written in 5 lines. Looked at Sunday Times: nothing in its front page, just the Premier League, Australian Open, Heineken

4287:

The only items for which consensus can be assumed are those for which we could equally easily assume snow support after a few votes. ITN/R, like the minority topics list, was a worthy suggestion, but should probably now be abandoned. At any rate, any ITN/R item that meets non-negligible opposition

2510:

The All-Ireland Senior Championship, however, is the premier tournament in Gaelic football. Just as the AFL Grand Final is the major tournament in Australian football, the Six Nations is one of the major tournaments in Rugby Union football, the Grey Cup is the major tournament in Canadian football,

2204:

and they've a pretty good record against them (Australia 8-8 Ireland). Last year Ireland drubbed Australia by the record score of 130-65! Comparing it to college or under-age amateurism is ridiculous. The "amateur" status is deliberate for historic reasons - it is very much a professional set-up in

915:

I note that this award has not even been included in the prose of the articles of the two most recent winners, which suggests that it is not that important in the view of editors interested enough in the field to edit those articles. However, it would be interesting to see what happens if the 2013

4795:

Yes, I warned that the argument was borderline tangential, but it goes to prove a principle. Just because one or two of us may not think a certain subject is notable worldwide, it doesn't mean that it isn't. Of course, your assertion that an ITN/R "need not even be discussed" is false, we have to

4413:

Aren't we having this same discussion in the nom? The ITN/R item isn't "mens age 35-43 close top 4wd raid rally", is simply "rally racing", all rally races. This is a big event, with a number of disciplines (bike, quad (open wheel), car, truck). I would not be so vehemently opposed to some sort of

4207:

As a non-football person myself, how many countries play and watch football compared to say basketball and cricket? The world should not have to revolve around the UK since the former two are in the same scale as the other two and the latter because it is one tier up from the Copa Libertadores and

1686:

on the same grounds that I proposed removal of Venice festival above: response at ITN/C shows that support is not so overwhelming that it can be assumed. ITN/R should not be a tail that wags the ITN/C dog: it should serve ITN/C by making recurrent obvious landslide supports unnecessary, it should

611:

One lives and learns... An admin will have to make a call on whether there is a consensus for or against the proposal on ITN/C at present: this discussion need not, and probably should not, impinge on that discussion. If it doesn't gain consensus, then appeal to ITN/R (which implies assumption of

455:

and will strike that comment. I do think it would be better to discuss this not in the middle of a related nomination though. I basically agree with your rationale that the world record criteria require interpretation and perhaps as such don't belong on ITNR (world records are also certainly not

5033:

While your impending "vehement oppose" is all very interesting and somewhat sinister, and in all practical terms pointless, why not just deal with the article in question. Or better still, make a case for those articles you've noted. ITN is heading towards self-destruct. It would be better for

4815:

that the 2014/15/16 etc rallies will be so self evidently important that the importance need not even be discussed? Of course it could be proposed in future years, but if consensus over importance is not clear in 2013 (or any other year), then consensus over importance in any other year cannot be

3978:

A fairly widely held opinion is that in terms of the strength of the teams, the Spanish big two are some way ahead of any two given English clubs, but in turn if you look at all 20 teams in each country then the Premier League is some way ahead. That's questionable, but it's certainly true to say

3606:

If you end up being the oldest person I bet you will think it is important. If it's so unimportant then the media should stop mentioning it. It is always going to be brought up manually, yet its approval is inconsistent at best. If we don't have something like that in the ticker, then it should

2067:

The exact same thing that does in Knowledge (XXG) articles. If we would use it as a source in a Knowledge (XXG) articles, and its a news source, like a newspaper, major news website, TV news report, whatever. If the news sources are giving it substantial (not trivial, but substantial) coverage,

1505:

Each nomination on ITN/C turns into an off-topic debate into ITN/R, whether Ireland as a state or Irish sport as an institution is notable enough for the front page, whether the result sees a significant readership bounce from being on the front page, the role of the front page, and for connected

1159:

Although it has just been posted, that was far more in deference to this page than because there was support for the nomination on the basis of its importance. That is surely not the way ITN/r should work: incluion here is based on the assumption that importance is so obvious that it is not even

229:

Running 100m in sub 10 second time is impressive. So is shooting 99/100 targets, or achieving gold in the modern pentathlon, or scoring a double hat-trick in football. ITN/R is stuffed full as it is with events which might be voted out where the opportunity made available to do so: adding another

5280:

Popular in name/brand (like BTCC to non-Europeans), popular to people with cable TV access or can manage to stay up for late night TV and popular because there are a tiny other motorsport activities in January and yeah, because nobody is going to post other motorsport events in ITN in January. I

5166:

Getting rid of ITN/R sounds a lot like an idea I suggested some time ago to put each and every ITN/R member up for a "confirmation hearing", just the other way round. I don't believe it would be constructive to vote the whole thing out in one go. It would be helpful to be far more tough on those

1803:

the second most watched event by TV ratings after the super bowl. The individual Final Four games are always the highest rated non-NFL single sporting events every year, and even the early rounds of the tournament regularly beat the NBA Finals in terms of interest and viewership. By any actual

1371:

I'm not familiar with ITNR, so I am curious about how common an event needs to be so it can be listed. For example, I think that the literature entries would have less press and/or popular awareness than the Venice Film Festival. Are there any limits in particular to be applied to these kinds of

994:

which is held every three years. Consisting of 120 member states, and 21 observer countries which represent nearly two-thirds of the United Nations's members and contain 55% of the world population, it is the most important gathering of the Developing Countries. I think it really deserves to add

436:

Please don't presume to ascribe motives to my proposals. This is the only item in ITN/R that is subjective: others are very specific tournaments, awards or positions. The whole point of ITN/R is that it is absolutely cut and dried, and does not require interpretation. Nominations that require

408:

Anyway, there's always subjectivity in discussion ITNR noms. While the world record ITNR listing is not entirely precise, it does provide three clear criteria to judge. If we remove that, then ITN nominations from the related sports become even more subjective and less based on any established

5071:

Yes, of course you can point that out. That's your prerogative. Having said that, just because items you like didn't make it to ITN, that's no reason to object to other similar items. Why not try something crazy, like nominating one of this here, although I don't fancy your chances given the

2571:

With one story a year not a significant reduction. This looks more like a "what the heck is this?"-case. But Gaelic football is also played in Canada, Australia and the USA. If there is lack of space, I suggest to wield the axe over a few USA subject to give due weight to world outside the USA.

348:

If things are open open to interpretation over whether ITNR status applies that itself defeats the whole purpose of an ITNR listing, since the debate then legitimately becomes about whether ITNR applies. The premise of them is too vague to allow it to be definitively asserted. I'm reminded of

5235:

While I would be reasonably happy to see that happen, and would have strong opinions about what criteria should be applied in a re-population exercise (though happier still simply to see it discontinued), I suspect that it would not be considered acceptable unless the proposal were much better

4541:

That really isn't being helpful. I'm genuinely trying to help here, as you can see from other nominations I've made. If you're stuck for anything to contribute other than sarcasm or insults, then I can only assume you have nothing to contribute. Look, I know it's Knowledge (XXG), and that more

3136:

The oldest person alive is of simple encyclopaedic relevance, and this obviously changes upon death. The use of the ticker seems a succinct and neat way to make mention of these encyclopaedic events. While the names are unlikely to be immediately recognisable to most readers, the articles will

2664:

Yeah, the London times might have reported on the Gaelic football final; it's like across the Irish Sea. And the NYT link you gave me issued reports as late as 1924(!). I'm referring to a GAA-centric page within its sports section, like this Times section for F1. It implies there's an in-depth

2478:

It is a major football tournament in Malaysia which has a marginally larger en.wiki audience than Ireland. So OK, ditch "in Malaysia" and it should be last as it is Gaelic football's representative by default. Those CNN lists don't mean a thing as they're Anglo- and outdoor-centric. No Tour de

1771:

As what I've said earlier this year, this year's Super Bowl should've gotten a record TV audience in the UK, with the BBC giving it prime TV real estate. It has also been reported (although not on a huge scale) on newspapers, elsewhere, so you'd know that the Super Bowl has been in the news in

4780:

OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason to retain. Inclusion at ITN/R is the declaration that an event is so important that we can assume that importance need not be discussed year by year, but that so long as the article is sufficiently updated, then it is to be posted. Given that support for the

1438:

There was one "lean towards" support, two supports that were described as conditional on ITN/R, two clear supports and one clear oppose. The posting was justified, and I didn't, and wouldn't, challenge it: the challenge is as to whether that level of support justifies the standing assumption

295:

Of course the breaking of world records can still be proposed, and I would imagine that they will from time to time be passed and make the front page, but I would propose that this inclusion in ITN is neither logical nor justified by the evidence of overwhelming consensus that ITN/R implies.

190:

I was aware that it failed ITN/C, I was one of those who posted in support of it. I have to say that it is one of the more absurd decisions I've seen there. The New York Marathon is posted annually, but I doubt that many outside the athletics fraternity would be able to recall who won it last

3981:

Don't get the bolded part of my post wrong, I'm very happy to post La Liga. I think we would be discriminating against football purely because of its popularity if we didn't post it. Nonetheless, when we start posting the Premier League, La Liga, and UEFA Champions League in relatively quick

205:

In that case, it is hard not to see this as an attempt to circumvent the possibility of the proposal failing at ITN/C next time around by having it established at ITN/R. That cannot be the purpose of ITN/R. This is a way of smoothing progress through ITN/R, not of dodging that discussion.

1555:

the highest competition in the sport, meaning that, viewership aside, it's an analogue to the Superbowl, the Grey Cup, et al. It's a sport without a huge international participation whose home country is its primary audience; much like those mentioned; and this is its premier championship.

159:

and even assuming the figures have been exagerrated dwarfs other significant ITN/R events such as The World Cup Final or The Superbowl. In addition other than a number of Marathon races, which I would argue of less interest than the 100 Metres final, there are no athletics events on ITN/R.

4354:. Look at the stuff on this list: netball, table tennis, snooker, none of that is making "the front page of bbc.com" either, but so what? If all that mattered was popularity we would post 50 soccer stories a year, 35 cricket stories, and nothing else because "it's not widely covered". -- 1527:

the proposal as drafted. But comments about this and other Irish stories give me great cause for concern. Scarcely a week goes by without someone rejecting a story on the basis that it would be better for a (real or imagined) other Knowledge (XXG) for the language or community affected.

1261:

level of systemic bias towards sports (and I note that yet another sport fan has weighed in below). Until this is dealt with, it is absolutely unacceptable to knowingly entrench that bias even more, by eroding further the coverage of equally popular but far more modestly covered fields.

416:

clearly applies in the case of a 27-year old record--no reasonable person could argue otherwise. Thus, really, the ITNR status should not be in dispute. Of course, if it were a 10-year record, it would be less clear and more open to interpretation. But nearly all ITN noms are open to

4380:

I could understand that worldwide popularity might not be a consideration, but I'm not seeing where this is hugely popular on a regional or national basis. Popularity and widespread coverage should be important for ITNR. Less popular events should be discussed on a per-event basis.

1211:

fans, so let's use sport. After all, sport and film are both huge, right? I look at the sort of coverage we give to sport at ITN/R, compared to seven articles for film (not all of which always get posted), and it's difficult to justify going after one of relatively few film articles.

2746:

WRT the London Times, you were "referring to a GAA-centric page within its sports section, like this Times section for F1. It implies there's an in-depth coverage about it." I linked to the Gaelic games section in the Times, which is unfortunately behind a paywall. The F1 section is

1194:

I'm opposed to this. I disagree with the accuracy of the nomination – not a single editor supported per ITN/R without also giving a qualitative reason for why they believed the event was important. While I agree with your line of thinking in general (although I would suggest that

5281:

suggest you to go to the person on the street and ask them who won and can they be bothered to come up with the answer in the same way some can say to the FIFA World Cup/Superbowl/F1 World Championship/MotoGP/UEFA Champions League, which is what my oppose nomination is based on.

1280:

me in the archive of this page proposing removal of sport than other events): I brought it here because there was an apparent inconsistency between the opinions of importance at ITN/C and the purpose of ITN/R, and envisage myself doing the same for sports events in the future.

4619:

being popular, since a negative cannot be proven; they can only give their opinion based on their personal experience. The question is, can you demonstrate that this niche event is popular(even if only regionally or nationally) and widely covered? I believe we don't have the

3661:

on whether such people should get a full blurb. These people are not celebrities, and do not really fall into a particular field. As such, very few people will have heard of them. If they are going to go on the Main Page, they should have full blurbs to explain who they are.

4582:

about it comparison to say F1/MotoGP/WRC, no. The only kind of people who talk about it are enthusiasts, why, I when I used to watch it on Eurosport, the only people I can talk to about it are people who have real interests in it and held subscription to cable TV channel.

1223:

P.S. at ITNC you cite a lack of unanimity for your decision to come here. I think it is therefore relevant to point out that the only person opposed to posting was supportive of posting the chess olympiad, which is generally seen as the second highest profile chess event.

568:

any of the above discussion began and before any policy change that might result from it, it should be allowed to follow the guidelines as they were when it began, not when it finished. Whether you agree with it or not is up to you; but that's what's being asked for.

4284:

Too many items listed here fall under the same category. Items are added to the list even under a less than overwhelming consensus here, among a tiny number of editors; that then becomes the basis for ignoring a consensus of a much larger group at the candidates

4258:

for removal. This event doesn't seem to have a wide appeal anywhere from what I can see right now; there certainly is not much coverage of the current holding of it. I could potentially change my mind if supporters of keeping it explained why it should be here.

4926:

On the other hand, I say if we are fored to keep this, give ITN/R a major overhaul as many world headline articles have been overlooked in favour of some that is not seriously newsworthy material and some of those listed on ITN/R are making a mockery of ITN.

4911:

Do you believe that current discussion at ITN/C demonstrates that this reaches a "notability threshold"? Do you believe that the prominence being given to coverage of the event in the mainstream media reflects that this has reached a "notability threshold"?

3062:

the only notability this year was Messi being given the award 4 times in a row. It's no different from the Hart Trophy, the Heisman Trophy, or the Maurice Podoloff Trophy. We don't need to be a ticker for professional athletes patting each other on the back.

2301:

Ireland is on that list you refer to. It's well within the top 20 and going quite well for having "only 4 million" actually. There could be a few more from the likes of India or Brazil but who nominates them? Who works on them? Is Ireland to blame for that?

2172:

No one opposed it since every oppose vote for the last half-decade has turned into a discussion of Ted Kennedy proportions, and similar ITNR discussions weren't even clear in support of retention, but was bogged down in "no consensus, so keep" purgatory.

4153:

Seems removing the Premiership wouldn't be that popular. I'll try and remember to nominate La Liga at ITN/C this year and if it passes we could have a ITN/R decision. Personally I'd be sympathetic if someone nominated Seria A and the Bundesliga as well.

4351: 4600:

With 7 billion people in the world, hundreds of TV distributors, millions of websites and news papers, could you please provide more concrete evidence than your happenstance interactions with "average Joe Public" or what you may have seen on TV?

4465:

I have repeatedly called for a radically reassessment of ITN/R, and not only for sports, but I see nothing particular about this event that would trigger it. How exactly is exclusion of the Dakar rally inconsistent with the principles of ITN/R?

3717:, not the EPL. Thought I might open a discussion here about what to do with this. We could post both, post neither, or replace the EPL with La Liga. Maybe because we're an English-language outfit we should stick with the status quo. Thoughts? -- 5019:), are we going to say these should be listed in ITN/R as well. You can keep this in ITN/R but if another nomination appears again each year, I'll vehemently oppose each nomination with the same comment as i had done in the last two editions. 2950:

of this page doesn't list dates or approximate dates for most (all?) of these items. I think it'd be nice to include dates. The World Series generally takes place in . The Nobel Peace Prize is usually awarded in . Etc. Any thoughts on this?

1037:

It is impossible to have something here that does not demonstrate the ability to easily and uncontroversially pass trough ITN/C. The current proposal, although it may succeed (and I have supported it) certainly does not demonstrate that.

3979:

that the typical Premier League teams (the Stokes and West Hams) are streets ahead of typical La Liga teams (the Getafes and Real Valladolids) both in terms of the amount of media coverage they receive, and fans through the turnstiles.

2461:

Meanwhile, the finals of the two major tournaments in Gaelic games are both in the top 10 list for outdoor events and CNN rank the hurling final second only to the Olympic for "must see" sporting events to see this year (links above).

1532:. (Never mind the prevalence of English in Ireland.) The death of internationally renowned bestselling author Maeve Binchy didn't get a mention at ITN in part due to the vigorous slating that Ireland-related stories tend to receive. 4963:

A little further thought. While I stand by my comment that this event is mainly of interest to a small number of enthusiasts, which is a subjective statement difficult to prove but several editors agree, I do believe that like the

1304:

I'd agree with removing all film festivals from the list. Unlike awards shows (the Oscars for example) festivals are mostly watched by critics and insiders. Remember, even if they get removed, they can still go through ITNC.

1206:

arguments significant weight unless we are working from an agreed baseline from at least one field. Without a baseline, it's simply "I think this is important" vs "I don't". All three participants in this discussion so far are

3191:. In the example case, Manfredini literally did nothing of note in her entire life. This does not warrant an automatic spot at ITN. We may as well start posting other special interest stories to ITN while we are at it. 5056:

was opposed and thus never made it to ITN and from what I think, Americans treat that and the Indy 500 like Australians treat the Bathurst 1000 and the French to Le Mans, only two of those are in ITN/R, hence my point.

314:. I generally support these records appearing, but there's no use in having such vague guidelines on ITN/R. Today's debate over the women's relay showed that these guidelines are not supported by consensus in any case. 4139:

Problem with that is that, if a team is very sucessful, they can be in an unnassailable position (generally considered having won) with weeks to go. As such it's difficult to predict when these two stories will occur.

2823:

Nonsense? No, the same type of argumentation as used by Howard the Duck... The world is bigger then the USA, but you should add significant sports, even when it is only significant in a few countries. Locals sports as

1660:

per GRAPPLE. This receives ample coverage in the media within Ireland, enough to indicate to me that it belongs on ITN/R. Because it is likely to do so every year, I don't see why we should remove it from the list.

2506:

It may be a major football tournament in Malaysia but is the Malaysian football league one of, "...the major tournaments in different types of football ..."? No. It is not one of the major tournaments in association

4527:. Banish it at once, and make room for the national football championship of Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Portugal and even Australia! (I think I understand now, thanks to all for your help). -- 288:

There is currently very active debate on ITN/C about whether the women's 4x100 m should be posted on ITN. Regardless of the outcome of that discussion, it seems to fatally disprove the premise that the item can be

3841:

I'm guessing it was down to your personal opinion-based approach that La Liga was somehow has "higher quality" and has "more international coverage", the first is purely subjective, the second is plain false.

4718:

So because January 2013 is a slow news month (or more to the point, items have not been convincingly presented at ITN/C), we are to oblige ourselves to posting this event evey year for the foreseeable future?

4542:

generally we're arguing on the Internet which is it's own special creation, but to come back with that kind of response to a genuine and constructive post from Kevin and me just seems low, cheap and childish.

5300:

I'm getting off the fence and voting to support keeping this--bearing it mind that as always it should only be posted if there is a quality update. It's a fairly established event and a unique event at

4781:

importance of the 2013 rally is clearly lacking at ITN/C, why on earth would we assume in advance that the 2014/15/16 etc rallies will be so self evidently important that it need not even be discussed.

2892:

also had a tough time, since English speaking teams (read: UK) perform poorly. I didn't see that argument in the handball nominations, where UK-based teams are just as crappy. At least that one passed.

2260:

The English Knowledge (XXG) should cover a broad range of topics, particularly from countries with significant English speaking populations. There is more to life then soccer, cycling and cricket. --

152: 1453:

We should not judge editors' !votes on the basis of other nominations that they have made, and given that the chess received unanimous support, that comment is as disrespectful as it is irrelevant.

269:

A world record (in an event such as aquatics or athletics) that is broken either: by an unusually large margin, after a very long time period, or in a highly publicized event (e.g., 100 metre dash)

3283:

relevance of the events. While collecting long-lens photos of celebrities is of no use to an encyclopaedia, cataloguing longevity records is something a decent encyclopaedia would expect to do. --

2435:

The Gaelic football tournament would be like behind the likes of the Malaysian football league. And no one in his right mind would say that the League Cup or the Phoenix Open are ITNR material. –

1499:

To remove from ITN/R All-Ireland Senior Football Championship. At the next time this event occurs, it will have to be nominated and discussed as a normal event, not something with a free pass.

4671:

I don't know much about American TV network, so you mean midnight, the graveyard shift hour, when a smaller percentage of people watch TV. According to my TV channel app, IIRC, it was shown on

3334:- meaning that the mean (~1 yr) would be greater than the median (~8 months). The mean however remains the best estimate of how often the story would recur over an indefinite period of time. -- 4640: 2278:

should be our primary basis, not some prejudice that there should be a couple of Irish ITNR events solely because most people believe that it has "a significant English speaking population." –

597:

Grapple X's explanation is correct. I simply meant to say that even if this discussion concludes before the 4x100 nom, I'd suggest not changing the rules for a nomination in the middle of it.

1588:

What's this Ireland never gets ITN blurbs? Ireland easily gets ITN blurbs in comparison to its size. When was the last time we had a Singaporean sporting event in ITNR? That's right, never. –

3879:

which clearly indicates them as the historically top 4 leagues in terms of league strength. I'm all for more inclusiveness on ITN. We're far too elitist and restrictive there as it is. --

4972:

race even if people don't follow it closely. It's very well established. It's features parts of the world which don't normally get on ITN. So I don't know, I think I"m neutral for now.--

1332:

Venice is the oldest film festival in the world and second most notable after Cannes. The festival and award gets lots of news coverage across the globe and is easily a contender for ITNR.

2885:, but it was shot down. That was nowhere an American sport. Good thing people reconsidered in the 2012, but something tells me Australia making it to the final made them change their mind. 3713:

This is probably fairly newsworthy, especially in English speaking territories, but most people who follow European football will probably say the dominant world club league is currently

2665:

coverage about it. We're not the either of the Times, but as a section about current events in an encyclopedia, there should be proof that there's enough in-depth coverage on the item. –

1776:

is quite a different sport than NBA or FIBA basketball with its different rules; think of it as Twenty20 in cricket, which is sure to get overwhelming support once it's world cup ends. –

4639:

Cup. ESPN headlines: NFL playoffs, Australian Open, NBA. There is that rally but it is next to soccer, above them is college football. Daily Mail, theres one because of the magic word

2169:

know about it should nominate it as well, put in the work and the effort and so on. Would be better than moaning about why Singapore or any other country does not get enough mentions.

476:

FWIW (not very much from the look of that discussion), I think the 4x100 nom should be "grandfathered in" regardless of the result of this thread here. But that thread is likely to be

98: 90: 1523:

I'd like to separate out concerns about Gaelic Football from concerns about Ireland generally. I'm not at all convinced that this championship needs to be in ITN/R, and provisionally

85: 73: 68: 63: 4878:- Not to get into OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but compared to some other events on ITN/R, which I am using not as comparison but as a notability threshold, this deserves to be on that list. 3802:

I'm not sure why my comment got that response. I am aware that Britons hold the EPL as eons ahead of other football leagues, but the fact is La Liga is as good if not better, and

4399:

Being a top level event in one classification has never been grounds for ITN/R listing. If it were, the women's powerlifting -63kg title could be celebrated every year at ITN.

2863:

would reach the final... Perhaps I misinterpret your words, but I have the idea that you are saying: "When a sport event is not in the USA, it is not interesting for the world."

4113:

My suggestion would be to put La Liga and the EPL into a single blurb when appropriate. I think it should stop there in terms of domestic football leagues. So my !vote is to

3746:- It has a higher quality of play and gets more international coverage. There have been a lot of recent complaints about too much football, so just La Liga should be enough. 3010:" before it merged with a French award. All current soccer ITNR items relate to clubs or nations, this would be an addition to reflect individual achievement in the sport. 2144:. At time of posting this nomination had a string of supports and a single oppose so I don't see the argument that there isn't a consensus that this should be posted.-- 5053: 4209: 3187:, actually. But then, I personally don't think a person is even notable simply for being old. Hell, the closest thing any of these people ever do to become notable is 1620:

on the condition that editors understand and accept that opposing it for the sole reason it is not ITN/R and nothing especially notable happened is not valid. See the

5195:

Would you (or anyone) be kind enough to explain the advantage of ITN/R when each and every entry has to go through exactly the same scrutiny before being posted?

4991:- To anybody who think the Dakar Rally deserve to be in ITN/R because it is legendary and top tier, then what about these major and some, longer established races: 4279:

by making recurrent obvious landslide supports unnecessary, it should not undermine ITN/C by stating that consensus is irrelevant as it has already been determined.

4447:

Aren't those called straw man attacks? Ultimately I don't care, but if the Dakar Rally goes, we'll need to initiate an overhaul of all sporting events on ITN/R. --

3006:

are the governing body of world association football, this is the most authoritative selection as to the best player in the world - the award used to be called "

4523:

Right all I totally don't get it. The Dakar Rally is weak and lame. No one watches it, no one cares, so off of ITN/R with it! But only it! Because there can be

1476:

though TIFF is second behind Cannes, Venice is a close third, with BIFF rounding out what seems to be the four most important film festivals on the calendar. --

4657:

It's on NBC sports right now, comcast channel 37 in south florida. I'm an average Joe, and I'm watchin it on TV! (well I was, my wife immediately objected). --

2024:

Still, I will still continue to work towards having objective standards about what gets through ITN, and not "I've never heard of it" or "I don't like it". --

21: 2161:. Johnsemlak makes excellent point. Where were all those who wanted it removed from this list when this year's final was nominated at the candidates page by 273:

Without prejudice to whether world records should or should not make it onto ITN, I suggest that the above should not be on this list for two main reasons.

3228:

Being lucky or skilled enough to survive over 110 years of war, disease, accidents, etc. isn't notable? I guess the media should stop mentioning it, then.

412:

In the case of the relay race currently being discussed, I think the ITNR wording in fact helps deciding whether it's worth posting. One of its criteria,

4208:

the UEFA Champions League. Anybody who want to disagree on its importance, the two links tell you that the South American teams take this event seriously.

2689: 2529:

Is being a "premier tournament" of a sport that is labeled as "football" is enough, when other lesser tournaments from other "footballs" get more press? –

1351:

I don't necessarily disagree with you: the issue is whether the reasons that you state are sufficiently recognised, with sufficient unanimity, at ITN/C.

157: 4211: 2226:

College football is also deliberately amateur, although there had been calls to compensate the so-called "student-athletes". The interest dwarfs even

2966:

This is a working page for editors, not encyclopaedic content for visitors, so it seems rather redundant, but if you would like to, I won't object.

2458:

Again, "...the major tournaments in different types of football ..." The Malaysian football league is not a major tournament in association football.

3703: 595:

I thought the dictionary and Knowledge (XXG) entries were sufficient background, but am happy to provide as many sources as necessary. In any case,

991: 128:

None of these of gone through ITNC (at least I can't remember them) so they shouldn't be added to ITNR until they sucessfully clear that hurdle.

4306:

it's a top tier tournament in a major motorsport classification. It's 1 story per year, if the article is updated. It hurts precisely nothing. --

2755: 2748: 4830:

Ok, will consider that every time an ITN/R gets a whiff of opposition, we'll delist it from ITN/R. In that case, what is the point of ITN/R?

5221: 5008: 4089:. Top-to-bottom, England's Premiership is widely reported upon and hosts a very international lineup which make it a good choice to go with. 3989: 3943: 3788: 3669: 2905: 2848: 2791: 2735: 2677: 2626: 2541: 2495: 2447: 2389: 2340: 2290: 2242: 2185: 2056: 2013: 1966: 1898: 1847: 1788: 1600: 1428: 1402: 1269: 3159: 2765: 2707: 2655: 2605: 2518: 2469: 2426: 2368: 2717: 738:

Anyone could have done it, but Everyone said, "Someone should do it." While Everyone was waiting for Someone to act, Noone did it instead.

3682:

and that was my honest reaction before I saw Medias' comment above. This is trivia that is likely unsubstantiated in most cases anyway.--

1979:

I absolutely would, if someone could show me both a quality article about it and enough reliable news sources which cover it in depth. --

1747:, etc). Like the NCAA tournament, it doesn't have to be on ITN/R, but if the consensus is there to post it, then it should be posted. -- 2416: 2309: 816:

Well, I don't see why we should have the Abel Prize and not the Holberg Prize - although there are two alternative ways of fixing that.

3592:

Because the personal details of the title holder are very rarely of any importance at all other than the fact that they are breathing.

3113: 5181:

I think being tougher isn't a bad idea, but getting rid of ITNR outright would be like cutting our hand off to get rid of a hangnail.

4191: 2693: 2642: 2212: 942: 3312: 2408: 1832: 1828: 1736: 1506:

purposes. These discussions are almost always circular and tend to squeeze out less established editors with their tone and temper.

1005: 3727:

I'd favour adding La Liga, and not removing the EPL. I don't think 'we're in English' is any justification for being Anglocentric.

2759: 2701: 2649: 2599: 2512: 2463: 2420: 2362: 2162: 2802:

The Superbowl also got just a mention on a pages with sport results. So it is not important in Ireland and can be removed from

1917:

in the relevent country (Ireland) thinks is a big deal, and since reliable sources say it is a big deal, who am I to object? --

1160:

worth discussing at ITN/C, and that importance threshhold is indisputable. That certainly does not seem to be the case here.

967:. I don't think this should always be a requirement for this page, but in this particular case it does seem like a good idea. 835:

This prize isn't major world news, but it is major academic news, and therefore a good topic for an encyclopedia front page.

5215: 3983: 3782: 3663: 1715: 1422: 1314: 1263: 1225: 1213: 672:- When we have an overload of these, like Olympics and World Championships, it often gets ignored or misinterpreted anyway. 353:, where the nominator definitively asserted ITNR was valid based on all three categories but I countered that it didn't fit 2836:

The Super Bowl got a mention on a ton of news sources. This, not much. As for Elfstedentocht, it isn't recurring, anyway. –

5236:

publicised than a note deep into a discussion with no notification elsewhere, and no header drawing attention to it. (I,

4900: 3828: 3768: 3569: 3350:. I would be inclined to oppose had the death ticker not existed, but this type of death is exactly what it was made for. 3007: 1646: 694: 5035: 4524: 51: 17: 1762: 3397:

can relate to. The question is the notability, not our opinions of what hypothetical "typical readers" want to read.

247:

The fact that the 100m final failed to make ITN this year suggests that it is not indisputably supported by consensus.

5250:

as per my comment on the ITN/C nomination, but the critical part for these type of items is the article prose update.

4846:

which are considered to have already satisfied the 'importance' criterion for inclusion on ITN, every time they occur.

3305:- The "average" reign is a year, but less than a third (16) have lasted that long...so the data's kind of worthless. 3017: 1687:

not undermine it by telling the community that it has already made a decision that it is not confident with at all.

3107:. A Recent Deaths ticker item - posting a full blurb in an exceptional case would be a matter for ITN/C discussion. 660: 5310: 5290: 5275: 5258: 5226: 5204: 5200: 5190: 5176: 5149: 5131: 5127: 5111: 5081: 5077: 5066: 5047: 5043: 5028: 4981: 4958: 4936: 4921: 4904: 4858: 4839: 4835: 4825: 4805: 4801: 4790: 4771: 4767: 4746: 4728: 4711: 4684: 4666: 4652: 4633: 4610: 4591: 4551: 4536: 4518: 4503: 4489: 4475: 4456: 4442: 4423: 4408: 4390: 4363: 4346: 4329: 4315: 4297: 4268: 4249: 4222: 4199: 4175: 4158: 4144: 4130: 4108: 4073: 4048: 4028: 4014: 3994: 3970: 3966: 3949: 3917: 3894: 3851: 3847: 3832: 3793: 3772: 3736: 3721: 3691: 3674: 3649: 3616: 3601: 3573: 3542: 3520: 3506: 3475: 3442: 3428: 3406: 3391: 3374: 3338: 3320: 3287: 3274: 3259: 3237: 3223: 3202: 3178: 3089: 3072: 3052: 3043: 2988: 2975: 2960: 2911: 2876: 2854: 2819: 2797: 2769: 2741: 2711: 2683: 2659: 2632: 2609: 2585: 2547: 2522: 2501: 2473: 2453: 2430: 2395: 2372: 2346: 2317: 2296: 2269: 2248: 2220: 2201: 2191: 2153: 2124: 2083: 2062: 2039: 2019: 1994: 1972: 1939:

While I can understand posting about a sporting event that is supposedly cared upon by people half the size of the

1932: 1904: 1881: 1853: 1819: 1794: 1766: 1723: 1696: 1676: 1650: 1621: 1606: 1575: 1541: 1517: 1485: 1462: 1448: 1433: 1408: 1385: 1381: 1360: 1340: 1322: 1289: 1274: 1252: 1229: 1217: 1187: 1169: 1148: 1129: 1116: 1101: 1069: 1047: 1028: 1010: 975: 953: 925: 909: 881: 859: 844: 825: 810: 764: 747: 731: 713: 698: 664: 621: 606: 588: 559: 545: 527: 505: 489: 469: 446: 426: 393: 372: 340: 323: 305: 256: 239: 215: 200: 185: 169: 140: 121: 42: 3634:

I suggested this as a joke. Let them all be nominated separately, and if seven die over a seven-day period, then

1421:. The only opposition came from a user who on the very same day nominated the year's second biggest chess event. — 4183:

for sure. They are the two most important. I am also open to the possibility of adding Serie A and Bundesliga. -

3938: 3875:

as well? Those leagues have historically been ranked with the EPL and La Liga in terms of league strength. See

2900: 2843: 2786: 2730: 2672: 2648:

In either event, we are not a syndicate of the New York Times of the Times of London. We are an encyclopaedia. --

2621: 2536: 2490: 2442: 2384: 2335: 2285: 2237: 2180: 2051: 2008: 1961: 1893: 1842: 1783: 1595: 1397: 1202:

I have made a case above as to why this event is fairly important within its field, but it is impossible to give

656: 3026:

this hasn't gone through ITNC, so any discussion here is premature. It wasn't even nominated there this year.

515: 3958: 3331: 2882: 1951: 4019:

Do you ever have a discussion at or about ITN without dragging your contempt for non-American things into it?

3013:

Occurs annually in early January. Attracts significant media attention and is global in scope and interest. --

1551:

isn't for a sporting event to be the highest level of its sport; the All-Ireland Senior Football Championship

1053: 2275: 891:

I would say that getting something through there is a necessary first step before anything new is added here.

4675:

at 1am when people are in bed, goes to prove though they know the name, the public's attitude to the event.

4086: 3471: 3438: 2986: 2716:

The fact that it's behind a paywall in the London Times, and the latest Gaelic games report in the NY Times

2313: 1831:

as a reason why Gaelic games (or perhaps it was another event, I forgot) since this had massive attendance;

1127: 973: 905: 291:

considered to have already satisfied the 'importance' criterion for inclusion on ITN, every time they occur.

3308: 3120:

who died a couple of weeks ago seems unbalanced. Adding this item to ITN/R would help achieve consistency.

2305: 2208: 452: 112:

a pan-Latam awards show. For that matter isnt there a pan-Asian show...i m pretty sure i heard of it once.(

4759: 4758:

while somewhat a tangential argument, it's staggering to me that we're happy for an obscure poetry award (

4233:

As suggested at the current ITN/C nomination, should Dakar Rally be removed from the Recurring Item list?

4187: 4024: 3913: 3732: 3255: 3219: 2638: 2216: 1537: 1097: 945: 938: 855: 806: 368: 196: 165: 1088:

rather than a routine editorial decision, and the threshold for inclusion is that it would pass at ITN/C

5286: 5196: 5145: 5123: 5073: 5062: 5039: 5024: 4945:

My feeling comes down to this--I have no problem with the Dakar rally being featured on ITN if there is

4932: 4831: 4797: 4763: 4680: 4648: 4587: 4218: 4085:, but it's too much of a two-horse race for me to find it worth reporting on; it's basically a "better" 3962: 3843: 3467: 3434: 3316: 1940: 1001: 901: 3250:

The media haven't given up on long-lens photographs of actresses, either. Shall we post some of those?

4480:

Not the principles, but the list. If the Dakar Rally goes, so should gaelic football, snooker, etc. --

5306: 5137: 4977: 4954: 4430: 4126: 3933: 3687: 3147:

out there, this would need to be restricted to verified claims, i.e. those that make the listings at

3085: 2895: 2869: 2838: 2812: 2781: 2725: 2667: 2616: 2578: 2531: 2485: 2437: 2379: 2330: 2280: 2232: 2175: 2149: 2046: 2003: 1956: 1888: 1837: 1799:

Regarding the NCAA tournament, we've tried that argument before. For any U.S. sporting event, it is

1778: 1590: 1392: 1208: 987: 465: 422: 869:

as this has never been included through ITNC yet, so we can't determine if consensus truly exists.

5172: 5107: 5000: 4996: 4917: 4854: 4821: 4786: 4724: 4547: 4514: 4499: 4471: 4438: 4404: 4293: 4245: 4099: 3607:

just be removed, since there is little point if we are going to prohibit things like this from it.

3597: 3424: 3368: 2971: 2956: 2115: 1872: 1692: 1566: 1513: 1458: 1444: 1356: 1285: 1248: 1165: 1112: 1043: 921: 743: 709: 617: 579: 555: 501: 442: 389: 301: 235: 211: 181: 4334: 1196: 4742: 4707: 4039:. I took a bit of a break after the Messi travesty. Upon what are you basing your accusations? -- 3887: 3534: 3498: 3459:

Elizabeth II is also queen of 15 (16?) other countries and so there might be some interest there.

3387: 3199: 3035: 2981: 2076: 2032: 1987: 1925: 1911: 1812: 1773: 1731:

I agree that it is a significant event in Ireland, but outside of Ireland, it is hardly covered (

1708: 1669: 1307: 1122: 1065: 1024: 968: 916:

award is nominated at INT/C, and if support then is overwhelming, this may be worth revisiting.

872: 821: 722: 533: 523: 336: 131: 4195: 2754:

Finally, there are articles in the New York Times of Gaelic games interest in the New York area

1084:

days and with only a single opinion expressed would probably be re-listed. This is a change of

949: 790: 2996: 1706:

I don't think this event has enough widespread attention to be an automatic as ITNR dictates.

865:

Discussion hasn't gone on long enough, and you shouldn't be making the call. For the record I

4896: 4624:

championships in ITN/R, for example, because it is a niche event that is not widely popular.

4184: 4020: 3909: 3824: 3764: 3728: 3565: 3251: 3215: 1950:), I don't think anyone would support a similar event at a place with the similar size of the 1642: 1533: 1182: 1093: 935: 851: 840: 802: 719:

I'm restoring. No comment on the merit, but someone else should do it for appearances sake.

690: 602: 541: 485: 364: 319: 252: 192: 161: 357:

of them. The possibility of such discussions simply shows how weak the current criteria are.

5282: 5271: 5186: 5141: 5058: 5020: 4928: 4676: 4644: 4629: 4583: 4386: 4342: 4325: 4264: 4214: 4171: 3876: 3645: 3612: 3516: 3402: 3270: 3233: 3174: 3144: 2980:

Sure, why not. Can't hurt. I wouldn't bother being any more specific than the month though.

1758: 997: 117: 964: 5302: 4973: 4950: 4122: 3683: 3433:

So was I hallucinating the people taking part in events over the Diamond Jubilee weekend?

3081: 2864: 2807: 2573: 2200:

If it's any use these are the type of players who also play against the AFL's best in the

2145: 564:

The notion of "grandfathering in" the nom in question means that, because it was proposed

461: 418: 2068:

then there is no grounds to object. None whatsoever, aside from personal prejudices. --

4037: 4034: 2404:"...the major tournaments in different types of football ..." Note the definite article. 2274:

I fail to see that 4 million is significant enough. If we're into serving our audience,

1107:

Given failure of recent nomination at ITN/C, this cannot possibly be considered ITN/R.

5237: 5168: 5103: 5016: 4913: 4850: 4817: 4782: 4720: 4662: 4606: 4543: 4532: 4510: 4495: 4485: 4467: 4452: 4434: 4419: 4400: 4359: 4311: 4289: 4241: 4090: 4069: 4044: 4010: 3707: 3593: 3420: 3364: 3068: 2967: 2952: 2829: 2265: 2106: 1863: 1744: 1688: 1557: 1509: 1481: 1454: 1440: 1377: 1352: 1281: 1244: 1161: 1144: 1108: 1039: 917: 798: 794: 755: 739: 705: 613: 570: 551: 497: 438: 385: 297: 231: 207: 177: 3419:

I think you greatly over-estimate the interest of many UK residents in the Windsors.

3130:

it seems the average "reign" is about a year (53 different title holders since 1955).

5004: 4738: 4703: 4621: 4155: 4141: 3880: 3718: 3527: 3491: 3383: 3335: 3284: 3196: 3156: 3148: 3127: 3104: 3049: 3028: 3014: 2720:

says something that it's nowhere as major as any of "the major football tournaments".

2614:

I don't think the Times (New York or London) has a section devoted to Gaelic games. –

2069: 2025: 1980: 1918: 1805: 1662: 1061: 1020: 817: 778: 519: 332: 5252: 4880: 3808: 3748: 3549: 3117: 2860: 2595: 2480: 2001:

Fortunately, it's only you would supporting such thing. The others here wouldn't. –

1626: 1334: 1176: 836: 674: 598: 537: 481: 315: 248: 3547:

The same reason for the existence of ITN/R. It saves us from needless discussion.

3137:

generally state the person's supercenturion status in the first sentence or two.

1139:

I could find no article for the 15th summit? Are these held totally at random? --

5267: 5182: 4992: 4625: 4382: 4338: 4321: 4260: 4167: 3641: 3608: 3512: 3398: 3266: 3229: 3192: 3170: 2825: 2692:(unfortunately, it's behind a paywall). WRT the New York Times' website, click " 1750: 786: 456:'recurring'); that said, I strongly support keeping the wording as ITN criteria 113: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2590:

FYI the championship includes two teams from outside of the island of Ireland (

1732: 3872: 3636: 2889: 2591: 1740: 1057: 782: 1886:

Then what should we compare it with? Rugby that has shitty page view stats? –

5012: 4672: 4658: 4602: 4528: 4481: 4448: 4415: 4355: 4307: 4065: 4040: 4006: 4005:

sports news", which is precisely how I feel about all this Euro-football. --

3382:. Is a typical reader likely to be especially interested? I don't think so. 3064: 2261: 1477: 1373: 1140: 760: 789:

for the social sciences, humanities and law, and is awarded to people like

403:

This proposal seems suspiciously aimed at the 100 meter relay nomination.

4965: 3706:, and noticed that there's one national league competition in there: the 480:

resolved before this one in any case, whether by posting or expiration.

3868: 3714: 3210:- Being old is not an inherently notable achievement. Being older than 2412: 1947: 612:

the gaining of consensus) serves only to undermine the point of ITN/R.

4494:

Why is the removal of these dependent on the result of this proposal?

5136:

fourthed (if it is going to turn discussions into another episode of

3466:-estimate the interest of many US residents in the House of Windsor. 3214:

would be, but not just being older than anyone at a particular time.

1862:

stop comparing all sporting event nominations to college basketball?

4320:

If it's so top tier, why is it so difficult to find coverage of it?

3169:

this idea and the criteria. Good to have consistency in this area.

894:

Accepting HotStop's assertion that this has not gone through ITNC I

3279:

The difference between this and the examples Alex is citing is the

2641:. The New York Times did not report on the game this year but have 2044:

I'm interested on what counts as "reliable news sources", though. –

176:

the Olympics), I really cannot see how it can possibly be added.

3116:. During this discussion it was noted that posting this and not 3103:

The death of the world's oldest (verified) person, as listed on

3080:, for the same rationale it has been posted on ITN previously.-- 3003: 1092:

it is nominated. That can't be legitimately asserted here yet.

3048:

OK, I wasn't aware of this rule. See you in January I guess! --

1835:

also had massive attendances (they also sell out the venues). –

550:

Which still sheds no light on what on earth is being proposed.

3803: 2415:

final is number eight on that list and this years is number 2

850:

There appears to be unanimous consensus to include this item.

29: 4949:

content with it. Not sure what !vote that should be though.--

4205:

Also add La Liga, Serie A, Bundesliga and FIFA Club World Cup

4166:. The major national leagues with worldwide press coverage. 5214:

the mood, I just might go ahead and do it at the weekend. —

536:. Common here, but apparently hasn't caught on elsewhere. 758:. And endorsement from my side, I was uninvolved here. -- 2832:

should desrve a spot (held 15 times in the 20th century)

286:

Doubt about being deemed to have met importance criteria

2947: 2723:(PS: It should've been "newest" instead of "oldest".) – 1418: 995:

under "Economic and political summits" sub-section. --

511: 350: 4414:"world powerlifting championship" getting on ITN/R. -- 2865: 2828:

don't deserve a place (not a national sport), but the

2808: 2758:. They don't end in 1924 or 1963 or any other year. -- 2574: 2328:

who can work on a few pages for a few times a year. –

1390:

What was the !vote count at the ITN/C discussion? –

281:no question about whether an event meets ITN/R. 4995:, the other two endurance racing triple crowns ( 4525:no comparison with similarly uninteresting items 3957:and add La Liga and Serie A. Frankly, removing 3806:isn't much of a counterargument to what I said. 3126:Obviously impossible to predict, but looking at 1492:Remove All-Ireland Senior Football Championship 4615:That user can't provide evidence of something 409:criteria. ITN needs more criteria, not less. 3462:Also, parphrasing Kevin, I think you greatly 963:unless/until it is successfully nominated at 8: 2377:How is any GAA event a "major tournament"? – 1943:(Try supporting posting which team wins the 5240:, posted this at 20:54, January 22, 2013‎ ) 4733:It's not as if that's the only reason, but 4431:an extreme, but comparable, counter-example 3096:Add Death of World's Oldest Person (Ticker) 2230:almost all professional sports in the US. – 5054:the nomination for last year's Daytona 500 888:Has this even been proposed through ITNC? 4229:Proposal - Remove Dakar Rally from ITN/R 2323:Yeah it's on the top 20 all right, with 4288:at ITN/C should be removed from ITN/R. 4121:the EPL but with my suggestion above.-- 3489:this ought to be discussed each time. 2688:The London Times' Gaelic games section 992:16th Summit of the Non Aligned Movement 4033:Sure, off the top of my head, I guess 3095: 934:Major award for its academic field. - 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5007:, the endurance motorcycling majors ( 2645:on Gaelic games in the New York area. 2407:The match in question is number four 1257:The point is that there is already a 7: 3704:ITN/R items for Association Football 5266:. Popular sport in many countries. 3744:Replace Premier League with La Liga 4816:treated as a foregone conclusion. 2779:of the phrase "Gaelic football." – 2479:France? Phoenix Open ahead of the 451:Kevin I apologize for not showing 28: 2774:Sorry about the London times, as 5121:oops, can't vote for myself.... 4811:at ITN/C, why on earth would we 4064:- Plenty of football already. -- 3195:was cute. We should post that. 2859:I wonder what would happen when 1824:AFAIK, Gaelic games are amateur. 1737:NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament 781:. This is the equivalent of the 33: 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:In the news 4062:Oppose La Liga, Neutral Premier 3959:the world's most watched league 3698:On Association Football Leagues 1833:college basketball and football 982:Add Non-Aligned Movement Summit 4352:was easy enough for me to find 4081:. Not keen on La Liga—I'm not 2770:16:30, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2742:15:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2712:15:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2684:13:53, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2660:13:22, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2633:12:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2610:09:16, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2586:00:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2523:16:30, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2502:15:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2474:15:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2454:13:45, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2431:13:22, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2396:12:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2373:23:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC) 2297:12:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2270:22:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 2249:12:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2221:21:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 2192:12:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 2154:10:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 2125:04:07, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 2084:17:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 2063:15:20, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 2040:04:54, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 2020:04:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1995:04:24, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1973:04:20, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1933:04:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1905:04:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1882:04:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1854:03:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1820:03:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1795:02:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1767:00:40, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1724:23:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1697:19:35, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1677:17:48, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1651:17:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1607:04:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 1576:17:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1542:17:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1518:17:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1486:22:56, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 1463:18:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 1449:18:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 1434:14:44, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 1409:14:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 1386:16:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 1361:18:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 1341:08:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 1323:01:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 1290:19:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 1275:05:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 1253:21:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1230:07:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1218:07:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1188:07:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1149:18:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 704:Removed per clear consensus. 496:It should be whated? in what? 1: 4641:"Kate and Willy of Cambridge" 3675:07:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC) 3650:04:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC) 3617:12:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3602:07:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3574:05:36, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3543:04:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3521:03:59, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3507:03:48, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3476:11:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3443:11:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3429:07:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3407:03:28, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3392:00:48, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3375:18:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3339:17:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3321:15:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3288:00:38, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 3275:22:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3260:21:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3238:20:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3224:14:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3203:14:50, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3179:12:22, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3160:11:31, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 3053:15:07, 11 December 2012 (UTC) 3044:13:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC) 3018:12:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC) 3008:FIFA World Player of the Year 1170:22:16, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 1117:12:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 926:12:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 910:18:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 882:17:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 860:17:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 147:Add Olympics 100 metres Final 5311:16:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 5291:23:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 5276:11:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 5259:23:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 5227:20:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 5205:18:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 5191:11:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 5177:21:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 5150:21:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 5132:21:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 5112:21:01, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 5082:20:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 5067:20:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 5048:19:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 5029:19:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4982:15:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4959:15:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4937:18:10, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4922:23:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4905:18:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4859:07:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 4840:20:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4826:20:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4806:17:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4791:23:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4772:17:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4747:16:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4729:23:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4712:17:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4685:19:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4667:00:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4653:16:18, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4634:15:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4611:15:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4592:14:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4552:05:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4537:00:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4519:23:45, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4504:23:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4490:23:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4476:16:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4457:14:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4443:14:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4424:14:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4409:13:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4391:13:41, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4364:13:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4347:12:50, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4330:12:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4316:12:45, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4298:12:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4269:12:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4250:11:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 4223:23:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 4200:22:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 4176:12:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 4159:10:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 4145:15:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4131:15:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 4109:20:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 4074:19:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 4049:22:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 4029:19:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 4015:19:46, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 3852:18:07, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 3833:18:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 3692:15:41, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 3090:15:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 3073:19:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 2989:11:33, 15 October 2012 (UTC) 2976:20:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC) 2961:18:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC) 2912:01:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 2877:23:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 2855:18:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 2820:18:21, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 2347:18:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 4849:go through on a snow vote. 3995:12:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3971:10:35, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3950:09:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3918:09:23, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3895:06:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3794:12:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3773:05:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3737:23:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 3722:23:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 3330:Such data would tend to an 2881:I nominated (at ITN/C) the 2798:02:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 2548:02:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 2318:22:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 1530:This is not Anglophonopedia 1155:Remove Venice Film Festival 1130:13:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 1102:15:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 1070:14:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 1048:13:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 1029:13:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 1011:13:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 976:13:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 954:12:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 845:13:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 826:11:34, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 811:11:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 765:15:13, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 748:17:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 732:14:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 714:08:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 699:18:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 665:17:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC) 622:23:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 607:23:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 589:22:59, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 560:22:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 546:22:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 528:22:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 506:22:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 490:21:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 470:21:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 447:20:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 427:20:37, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 394:20:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 373:16:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 341:16:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 324:15:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 306:15:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 257:20:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 240:20:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 216:22:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 201:19:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 186:19:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 170:18:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 5327: 4844:Apparently, to list items 4737:, provided it is updated. 2637:Here is the London Times' 2202:International Rules Series 1439:implicit in ITN listing. 532:Yep. Dates back to the US 414:a very long period of time 151:I propose that we add the 141:15:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 122:13:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 4337:is also not an argument. 946:Random Picture of the Day 153:Olympics 100 Metres final 4181:Keep EPL and add La Liga 4164:Keep EPL and add La Liga 3929:Keep EPL and add La Liga 3877:UEFA coefficient#History 3332:exponential distribution 2883:2007 AFC Asian Cup Final 1952:Central African Republic 1200:do better at the latter. 2749:behind the same paywall 4760:Struga Poetry Evenings 3708:English Premier League 2888:My ITNR nomination of 278:Open to interpretation 230:seems highly suspect. 5052:Can I point out that 3702:I was looking on the 3143:While there are many 2163:Rannpháirtí anaithnid 1941:Northeast megalopolis 1622:discussion on hurling 777:I propose we add the 46:of past discussions. 5138:The Jeremy Kyle Show 988:Non-Aligned Movement 657:HeCameFromTheShadows 510:In response to your 263:Remove world records 3976:Premier League only 3657:this proposal, but 1827:Also, someone used 267:Current text reads 5036:other stuff exists 3961:would be idiotic. 2639:report on the game 1774:college basketball 1735:). Similar to the 534:grandfather clause 5122: 4813:assume in advance 4105: 4096: 3906:Tentative support 3867:. Also, why not 3372: 3361: 3311:comment added by 2833: 2308:comment added by 2211:comment added by 2121: 2112: 1915: 1878: 1869: 1572: 1563: 1186: 986:I propose to add 773:Add Holberg Prize 754:Removed again by 585: 576: 104: 103: 58: 57: 52:current talk page 5318: 5255: 5197:The Rambling Man 5124:The Rambling Man 5120: 5074:The Rambling Man 5040:The Rambling Man 4892: 4889: 4886: 4883: 4832:The Rambling Man 4798:The Rambling Man 4764:The Rambling Man 4240:on the matter.. 4106: 4101: 4097: 4092: 4079:Keep Premiership 3963:The Rambling Man 3946: 3941: 3936: 3890: 3883: 3844:The Rambling Man 3820: 3817: 3814: 3811: 3760: 3757: 3754: 3751: 3655:Strongly against 3561: 3558: 3555: 3552: 3539: 3538: 3532: 3531: 3503: 3502: 3496: 3495: 3362: 3360: 3357: 3355: 3323: 3145:longevity claims 3134:Brief Rationale: 3111:ITN/C precedent: 3040: 3039: 3033: 3032: 2997:FIFA Ballon d'Or 2994: 2908: 2903: 2898: 2867: 2851: 2846: 2841: 2822: 2810: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2762: 2738: 2733: 2728: 2704: 2699: 2680: 2675: 2670: 2652: 2629: 2624: 2619: 2602: 2576: 2544: 2539: 2534: 2515: 2498: 2493: 2488: 2466: 2450: 2445: 2440: 2423: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2365: 2343: 2338: 2333: 2320: 2293: 2288: 2283: 2245: 2240: 2235: 2223: 2188: 2183: 2178: 2122: 2117: 2113: 2108: 2079: 2072: 2059: 2054: 2049: 2035: 2028: 2016: 2011: 2006: 1990: 1983: 1969: 1964: 1959: 1928: 1921: 1909: 1901: 1896: 1891: 1879: 1874: 1870: 1865: 1860:maybe eventually 1850: 1845: 1840: 1815: 1808: 1791: 1786: 1781: 1756: 1753: 1720: 1719: 1713: 1712: 1672: 1665: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1629: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1573: 1568: 1564: 1559: 1417:Full discussion 1405: 1400: 1395: 1337: 1319: 1318: 1312: 1311: 1180: 1052:Well, there are 1009: 990:summits such as 880: 877: 876: 730: 727: 726: 686: 683: 680: 677: 586: 581: 577: 572: 516:1953, apparently 139: 136: 135: 82: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 5326: 5325: 5321: 5320: 5319: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5253: 5225: 5175: 4890: 4887: 4884: 4881: 4550: 4517: 4248: 4231: 4100: 4091: 3993: 3944: 3939: 3934: 3888: 3881: 3818: 3815: 3812: 3809: 3792: 3758: 3755: 3752: 3749: 3700: 3673: 3637:God help us all 3559: 3556: 3553: 3550: 3536: 3535: 3529: 3528: 3500: 3499: 3493: 3492: 3358: 3356: 3353: 3306: 3114:Dina Manfredini 3098: 3037: 3036: 3030: 3029: 3000: 2948:current version 2944: 2906: 2901: 2896: 2874: 2849: 2844: 2839: 2817: 2792: 2787: 2782: 2760: 2736: 2731: 2726: 2702: 2697: 2678: 2673: 2668: 2650: 2627: 2622: 2617: 2600: 2583: 2542: 2537: 2532: 2513: 2496: 2491: 2486: 2464: 2448: 2443: 2438: 2421: 2390: 2385: 2380: 2363: 2341: 2336: 2331: 2303: 2291: 2286: 2281: 2243: 2238: 2233: 2206: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2116: 2107: 2077: 2070: 2057: 2052: 2047: 2033: 2026: 2014: 2009: 2004: 1988: 1981: 1967: 1962: 1957: 1926: 1919: 1899: 1894: 1889: 1873: 1864: 1848: 1843: 1838: 1813: 1806: 1789: 1784: 1779: 1751: 1748: 1729:Support removal 1717: 1716: 1710: 1709: 1670: 1663: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1601: 1596: 1591: 1567: 1558: 1516: 1502:Justification: 1494: 1432: 1403: 1398: 1393: 1335: 1316: 1315: 1309: 1308: 1273: 1175:Broadly agree. 1157: 1060:is, like, now. 996: 984: 874: 873: 870: 791:Jürgen Habermas 775: 724: 723: 720: 684: 681: 678: 675: 653:Support removal 580: 571: 392: 381:Support Removal 312:Support removal 265: 238: 149: 133: 132: 129: 109: 78: 34: 26: 25: 24: 22:Recurring items 12: 11: 5: 5324: 5322: 5314: 5313: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5261: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5238:User:Kevin McE 5230: 5229: 5219: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5179: 5171: 5163: 5162: 5161: 5160: 5159: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5134: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5088: 5087: 5086: 5085: 5084: 5017:Suzuka 8 Hours 4986: 4985: 4984: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4908: 4907: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4775: 4774: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4715: 4714: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4636: 4595: 4594: 4579:Strong support 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4546: 4513: 4463: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4332: 4286: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4272: 4271: 4244: 4230: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4202: 4178: 4161: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4134: 4133: 4117:La Liga while 4111: 4076: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 3999: 3998: 3987: 3973: 3952: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3898: 3897: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3836: 3835: 3797: 3796: 3786: 3776: 3775: 3740: 3739: 3699: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3677: 3667: 3652: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3460: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3377: 3352: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3325: 3324: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3205: 3181: 3163: 3162: 3097: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3075: 3057: 3056: 3055: 2999: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2978: 2943: 2942:Include dates? 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2886: 2870: 2830:Elfstedentocht 2813: 2756:from this year 2752: 2721: 2646: 2579: 2569:Oppose removal 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2508: 2483:? What the? – 2459: 2411:. Last year's 2405: 2399: 2398: 2358:Oppose removal 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2258:Oppose removal 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2159:Oppose removal 2156: 2142:Oppose removal 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 1907: 1825: 1745:FIFA World Cup 1726: 1700: 1699: 1680: 1679: 1654: 1653: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1545: 1544: 1512: 1493: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1474:Oppose removal 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1451: 1426: 1412: 1411: 1388: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1344: 1343: 1330:Oppose removal 1326: 1325: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1267: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1191: 1190: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1105: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1032: 1031: 983: 980: 979: 978: 957: 956: 913: 912: 899: 892: 889: 885: 884: 848: 847: 829: 828: 799:Ronald Dworkin 795:Julia Kristeva 774: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 756:User:Grapple X 752: 751: 750: 702: 701: 667: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 548: 406: 405: 399:Oppose removal 396: 388: 377: 376: 359: 358: 343: 326: 264: 261: 260: 259: 242: 234: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 148: 145: 144: 143: 108: 105: 102: 101: 96: 93: 88: 83: 76: 71: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5323: 5312: 5308: 5304: 5299: 5296: 5292: 5288: 5284: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5273: 5269: 5265: 5262: 5260: 5257: 5256: 5249: 5246: 5245: 5239: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5228: 5224: 5223: 5217: 5212: 5211: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5193: 5192: 5188: 5184: 5180: 5178: 5174: 5170: 5165: 5164: 5151: 5147: 5143: 5139: 5135: 5133: 5129: 5125: 5118: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5109: 5105: 5101: 5100: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5094: 5093: 5092: 5083: 5079: 5075: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5055: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5045: 5041: 5038:don't you? 5037: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5026: 5022: 5018: 5014: 5010: 5006: 5005:Bathurst 1000 5002: 4998: 4994: 4990: 4987: 4983: 4979: 4975: 4971: 4967: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4956: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4943: 4938: 4934: 4930: 4925: 4924: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4910: 4909: 4906: 4902: 4898: 4894: 4893: 4877: 4874: 4873: 4860: 4856: 4852: 4847: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4823: 4819: 4814: 4809: 4808: 4807: 4803: 4799: 4794: 4793: 4792: 4788: 4784: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4773: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4757: 4754: 4753: 4748: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4731: 4730: 4726: 4722: 4717: 4716: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4698: 4697: 4686: 4682: 4678: 4674: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4664: 4660: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4642: 4637: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4623: 4622:wife carrying 4618: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4593: 4589: 4585: 4580: 4577: 4576: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4516: 4512: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4473: 4469: 4464: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4440: 4436: 4432: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4421: 4417: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4344: 4340: 4336: 4333: 4331: 4327: 4323: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4295: 4291: 4277: 4274: 4273: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4257: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4234: 4228: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4210: 4206: 4203: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4189: 4186: 4182: 4179: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4162: 4160: 4157: 4152: 4151: 4146: 4143: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4116: 4112: 4110: 4107: 4104: 4098: 4095: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4077: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4063: 4060: 4059: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4035: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3997: 3996: 3992: 3991: 3985: 3977: 3974: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3953: 3951: 3948: 3947: 3942: 3937: 3930: 3927: 3926: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3896: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3884: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3863: 3862: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3821: 3805: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3795: 3791: 3790: 3784: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3745: 3742: 3741: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3716: 3711: 3709: 3705: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3678: 3676: 3672: 3671: 3665: 3660: 3656: 3653: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3638: 3633: 3630: 3629: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3562: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3541: 3540: 3533: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3505: 3504: 3497: 3488: 3485: 3484: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3468:FerdinandFrog 3465: 3461: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3435:FerdinandFrog 3432: 3431: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3378: 3376: 3373: 3370: 3366: 3349: 3346: 3345: 3340: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3304: 3301: 3300: 3289: 3286: 3282: 3281:encyclopaedic 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3206: 3204: 3201: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3165: 3164: 3161: 3158: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3150: 3149:Oldest People 3146: 3142: 3138: 3135: 3131: 3129: 3128:Oldest People 3125: 3121: 3119: 3115: 3112: 3108: 3106: 3105:Oldest People 3102: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3061: 3058: 3054: 3051: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3042: 3041: 3034: 3025: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3016: 3011: 3009: 3005: 2998: 2990: 2987: 2985: 2984: 2983:Modest Genius 2979: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2941: 2913: 2910: 2909: 2904: 2899: 2891: 2887: 2884: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2875: 2873: 2868: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2853: 2852: 2847: 2842: 2835: 2834: 2831: 2827: 2821: 2818: 2816: 2811: 2805: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2796: 2795: 2790: 2785: 2777: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2757: 2753: 2750: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2740: 2739: 2734: 2729: 2722: 2719: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2676: 2671: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2647: 2644: 2643:long reported 2640: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2631: 2630: 2625: 2620: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2584: 2582: 2577: 2570: 2567: 2549: 2546: 2545: 2540: 2535: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2509: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2494: 2489: 2482: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2460: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2452: 2451: 2446: 2441: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2397: 2394: 2393: 2388: 2383: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2359: 2356: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2339: 2334: 2326: 2322: 2321: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2310:86.40.104.255 2307: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2295: 2294: 2289: 2284: 2277: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2241: 2236: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2203: 2199: 2198: 2193: 2190: 2189: 2184: 2179: 2171: 2170: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2157: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2140: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2114: 2111: 2103: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2073: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2055: 2050: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2029: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2012: 2007: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1984: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1953: 1949: 1946: 1945:international 1942: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1922: 1913: 1912:edit conflict 1908: 1906: 1903: 1902: 1897: 1892: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1877: 1871: 1868: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1851: 1846: 1841: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1809: 1802: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1793: 1792: 1787: 1782: 1775: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1755: 1754: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1714: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1666: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1623: 1619: 1616: 1615: 1608: 1605: 1604: 1599: 1594: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1565: 1562: 1554: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1389: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1370: 1369: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1313: 1303: 1302: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1265: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1231: 1227: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1198: 1193: 1192: 1189: 1184: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1125: 1124:Modest Genius 1120: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1082: 1079: 1078: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1007: 1003: 999: 993: 989: 981: 977: 974: 972: 971: 970:Modest Genius 966: 962: 959: 958: 955: 951: 947: 944: 940: 937: 933: 930: 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 911: 907: 903: 902:FerdinandFrog 900: 897: 893: 890: 887: 886: 883: 879: 878: 868: 864: 863: 862: 861: 857: 853: 846: 842: 838: 834: 831: 830: 827: 823: 819: 815: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 779:Holberg Prize 772: 766: 763: 762: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 729: 728: 718: 717: 716: 715: 711: 707: 700: 696: 692: 688: 687: 671: 668: 666: 662: 658: 654: 651: 650: 623: 619: 615: 610: 609: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 590: 587: 584: 578: 575: 567: 563: 562: 561: 557: 553: 549: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 530: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508: 507: 503: 499: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 459: 454: 450: 449: 448: 444: 440: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 424: 420: 415: 410: 404: 400: 397: 395: 391: 387: 382: 379: 378: 374: 370: 366: 361: 360: 356: 352: 347: 344: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 325: 321: 317: 313: 310: 309: 308: 307: 303: 299: 293: 292: 287: 282: 279: 274: 271: 270: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 243: 241: 237: 233: 228: 225: 224: 217: 213: 209: 204: 203: 202: 198: 194: 189: 188: 187: 183: 179: 174: 173: 172: 171: 167: 163: 158: 154: 146: 142: 138: 137: 127: 126: 125: 123: 119: 115: 106: 100: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 81: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 5297: 5263: 5251: 5247: 5220: 5116: 4988: 4969: 4946: 4879: 4875: 4845: 4812: 4755: 4734: 4699: 4616: 4578: 4303: 4283: 4275: 4256:Weak support 4255: 4237: 4235: 4232: 4204: 4185:Presidentman 4180: 4163: 4118: 4114: 4102: 4093: 4082: 4078: 4061: 4021:AlexTiefling 3988: 3980: 3975: 3954: 3932: 3928: 3910:AlexTiefling 3905: 3886: 3885: 3864: 3807: 3787: 3747: 3743: 3729:AlexTiefling 3712: 3701: 3679: 3668: 3658: 3654: 3635: 3632:Oh, God, No! 3631: 3548: 3526: 3490: 3486: 3463: 3379: 3351: 3347: 3307:— Preceding 3302: 3280: 3252:AlexTiefling 3216:AlexTiefling 3211: 3207: 3188: 3184: 3166: 3140: 3139: 3133: 3132: 3123: 3122: 3118:Besse Cooper 3110: 3109: 3100: 3099: 3077: 3059: 3027: 3023: 3012: 3001: 2982: 2945: 2894: 2871: 2861:New York GAA 2837: 2814: 2803: 2780: 2775: 2724: 2666: 2615: 2580: 2568: 2530: 2484: 2481:Japan Series 2436: 2417:on this list 2409:on this list 2378: 2357: 2329: 2324: 2304:— Preceding 2279: 2257: 2231: 2227: 2213:86.40.96.102 2207:— Preceding 2174: 2166: 2158: 2141: 2118: 2109: 2075: 2074: 2045: 2031: 2030: 2002: 1986: 1985: 1955: 1944: 1924: 1923: 1887: 1875: 1866: 1859: 1836: 1811: 1810: 1801:far and away 1800: 1777: 1749: 1728: 1707: 1703: 1683: 1668: 1667: 1657: 1625: 1617: 1589: 1569: 1560: 1552: 1534:AlexTiefling 1529: 1524: 1508: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1473: 1427: 1391: 1372:categories? 1333: 1329: 1306: 1268: 1258: 1203: 1201: 1158: 1136: 1123: 1094:Crispmuncher 1089: 1085: 1080: 1056:: like, the 1016: 985: 969: 960: 936:Presidentman 931: 914: 895: 871: 866: 849: 832: 787:Nobel Prizes 776: 759: 721: 703: 673: 669: 652: 594: 593:Yes, sorry. 582: 573: 565: 512:edit sumamry 477: 457: 413: 411: 407: 402: 398: 380: 365:Crispmuncher 354: 345: 329:Weak support 328: 311: 294: 290: 285: 283: 277: 275: 272: 268: 266: 244: 226: 193:yorkshiresky 162:yorkshiresky 150: 130: 110: 79: 47: 41: 5283:Donnie Park 5248:Weak oppose 5222:FL wishlist 5142:Donnie Park 5059:Donnie Park 5021:Donnie Park 4993:Daytona 500 4929:Donnie Park 4876:Strong Keep 4677:Donnie Park 4645:Donnie Park 4584:Donnie Park 4429:point with 4304:Strong keep 4215:Donnie Park 3990:FL wishlist 3789:FL wishlist 3670:FL wishlist 3313:12.41.124.5 3212:anyone ever 3193:Ikea Monkey 3124:Recurrence: 2826:Fierljeppen 2804:In the news 2718:was in 1963 1429:FL wishlist 1270:FL wishlist 107:Film awards 40:This is an 5303:Johnsemlak 5102:seconded. 4974:Johnsemlak 4970:well-known 4951:Johnsemlak 4123:Johnsemlak 3873:Bundesliga 3684:Johnsemlak 3525:Why not? 3082:Johnsemlak 2890:EuroBasket 2866:The Banner 2809:The Banner 2575:The Banner 2205:reality. 2146:Johnsemlak 1741:Super Bowl 1496:Proposal: 1259:disgusting 1090:every time 1058:NAM Summit 783:Abel Prize 462:Johnsemlak 453:Good faith 419:Johnsemlak 351:discussion 99:Archive 15 91:Archive 10 5104:Kevin McE 4914:Kevin McE 4851:Kevin McE 4818:Kevin McE 4783:Kevin McE 4721:Kevin McE 4673:TVB Pearl 4496:Kevin McE 4468:Kevin McE 4435:Kevin McE 4401:Kevin McE 4335:WP:NOHARM 4290:Kevin McE 3865:Keep both 3594:Kevin McE 3421:Kevin McE 2968:Kevin McE 2953:MZMcBride 2507:football. 1689:Kevin McE 1455:Kevin McE 1441:Kevin McE 1353:Kevin McE 1282:Kevin McE 1245:Kevin McE 1197:WP:NFOOTY 1162:Kevin McE 1109:Kevin McE 1086:guideline 1081:Premature 1040:Kevin McE 918:Kevin McE 852:Bjerrebæk 803:Bjerrebæk 740:Kevin McE 706:Kevin McE 614:Kevin McE 552:Kevin McE 498:Kevin McE 458:somewhere 439:Kevin McE 298:Kevin McE 208:Kevin McE 178:Kevin McE 86:Archive 9 80:Archive 8 74:Archive 7 69:Archive 6 64:Archive 5 5013:Bol d'Or 4968:it is a 4966:Iditarod 4901:contribs 4739:Formerip 4704:Formerip 4196:Talkback 4192:contribs 4156:LukeSurl 4142:LukeSurl 3955:Keep EPL 3871:and the 3829:contribs 3769:contribs 3719:LukeSurl 3570:contribs 3530:Hot Stop 3494:Hot Stop 3384:Formerip 3336:LukeSurl 3309:unsigned 3285:LukeSurl 3157:LukeSurl 3050:LukeSurl 3031:Hot Stop 3015:LukeSurl 2596:New York 2306:unsigned 2209:unsigned 1763:Contribs 1711:Hot Stop 1647:contribs 1382:contribs 1310:Hot Stop 1209:football 1204:anyone's 1137:Question 1121:Agreed. 1062:Wakari07 1054:criteria 1021:Wakari07 950:Talkback 943:contribs 875:Hot Stop 818:Formerip 785:and the 725:Hot Stop 695:contribs 520:Formerip 478:de facto 333:Formerip 156:billion 134:Hot Stop 20:‎ | 5301:that.-- 5254:Spencer 5169:doktorb 5117:thirded 5009:Le Mans 5003:), the 5001:Daytona 4997:Sebring 4989:Comment 4947:quality 4544:doktorb 4511:doktorb 4276:Support 4242:doktorb 4238:neutral 4119:keeping 4094:GRAPPLE 4083:opposed 3869:Serie A 3715:La Liga 3680:God No! 3659:neutral 3348:Support 3183:I lean 3167:Support 3078:Support 2690:is here 2511:etc. -- 2413:hurling 2110:GRAPPLE 1948:AL East 1867:GRAPPLE 1858:Can we 1718:(Edits) 1704:Support 1684:Support 1618:Support 1561:GRAPPLE 1525:support 1510:doktorb 1336:Lugnuts 1317:(Edits) 1177:Colipon 1017:Support 932:Support 837:Khazar2 833:Support 670:Support 599:Khazar2 574:GRAPPLE 538:Khazar2 482:Khazar2 386:doktorb 346:Support 316:Khazar2 249:Khazar2 232:doktorb 43:archive 5268:NickSt 5183:331dot 4626:331dot 4383:331dot 4339:331dot 4322:331dot 4261:331dot 4168:NickSt 3882:Jayron 3781:Lol. — 3642:μηδείς 3609:331dot 3537:(Talk) 3513:331dot 3501:(Talk) 3487:Oppose 3399:331dot 3380:Oppose 3303:Oppose 3267:331dot 3230:331dot 3208:Oppose 3185:oppose 3171:331dot 3060:Oppose 3038:(Talk) 3024:Oppose 2592:London 2071:Jayron 2027:Jayron 1982:Jayron 1920:Jayron 1807:Jayron 1752:Anc516 1733:Source 1664:Jayron 1658:Oppose 998:Seyyed 961:Oppose 896:oppose 867:oppose 566:before 245:Oppose 227:Object 114:Lihaas 5173:words 5119:.... 4548:words 4515:words 4285:page. 4246:words 4236:I am 3511:Why? 3464:under 3141:Note: 3101:Item: 2598:). -- 1514:words 965:ITN/C 898:this. 390:words 236:words 16:< 5307:talk 5298:Keep 5287:talk 5272:talk 5264:Keep 5201:talk 5187:talk 5146:talk 5140:;)) 5128:talk 5108:talk 5078:talk 5063:talk 5044:talk 5025:talk 5015:and 4999:and 4978:talk 4955:talk 4933:talk 4918:talk 4897:talk 4855:talk 4836:talk 4822:talk 4802:talk 4787:talk 4768:talk 4756:Keep 4743:talk 4725:talk 4708:talk 4700:Keep 4681:talk 4663:talk 4659:IP98 4649:talk 4630:talk 4607:talk 4603:IP98 4588:talk 4533:talk 4529:IP98 4500:talk 4486:talk 4482:IP98 4472:talk 4453:talk 4449:IP98 4439:talk 4420:talk 4416:IP98 4405:talk 4387:talk 4360:talk 4356:IP98 4343:talk 4326:talk 4312:talk 4308:IP98 4294:talk 4265:talk 4219:talk 4188:talk 4172:talk 4127:talk 4070:talk 4066:IP98 4045:talk 4041:IP98 4036:and 4025:talk 4011:talk 4007:IP98 3967:talk 3914:talk 3848:talk 3825:talk 3765:talk 3733:talk 3688:talk 3646:talk 3613:talk 3598:talk 3566:talk 3517:talk 3472:talk 3439:talk 3425:talk 3403:talk 3388:talk 3369:Talk 3365:Page 3354:Eric 3317:talk 3271:talk 3256:talk 3234:talk 3220:talk 3200:lute 3197:Reso 3175:talk 3086:talk 3069:talk 3065:IP98 3004:FIFA 2995:Add 2972:talk 2957:talk 2946:The 2872:talk 2815:talk 2766:talk 2708:talk 2694:Next 2656:talk 2606:talk 2594:and 2581:talk 2519:talk 2470:talk 2427:talk 2419:. -- 2369:talk 2325:0.7% 2314:talk 2276:this 2266:talk 2262:IP98 2228:some 2217:talk 2167:does 2150:talk 1829:this 1759:Talk 1693:talk 1643:talk 1538:talk 1482:talk 1478:IP98 1459:talk 1445:talk 1419:here 1378:talk 1374:Erik 1357:talk 1286:talk 1249:talk 1183:Talk 1166:talk 1145:talk 1141:IP98 1113:talk 1098:talk 1066:talk 1044:talk 1025:talk 939:talk 922:talk 906:talk 856:talk 841:talk 822:talk 807:talk 797:and 761:Tone 744:talk 710:talk 691:talk 661:talk 618:talk 603:talk 556:talk 542:talk 524:talk 502:talk 486:talk 466:talk 443:talk 423:talk 369:talk 337:talk 320:talk 302:talk 253:talk 212:talk 197:talk 182:talk 166:talk 118:talk 5216:WFC 4735:yes 4617:not 4115:add 4087:SPL 3984:WFC 3804:LOL 3783:WFC 3664:WFC 3359:Leb 3189:die 3002:As 2776:all 2698:;-) 1954:. – 1423:WFC 1264:WFC 1228:— 1226:WFC 1216:— 1214:WFC 401:. 355:any 284:2) 276:1) 124:). 5309:) 5289:) 5274:) 5218:— 5203:) 5189:) 5148:) 5130:) 5110:) 5080:) 5065:) 5046:) 5027:) 5011:, 4980:) 4957:) 4935:) 4920:) 4903:) 4899:• 4891:bl 4888:ee 4885:zw 4857:) 4838:) 4824:) 4804:) 4789:) 4770:) 4745:) 4727:) 4710:) 4683:) 4665:) 4651:) 4632:) 4609:) 4601:-- 4590:) 4535:) 4502:) 4488:) 4474:) 4455:) 4441:) 4433:. 4422:) 4407:) 4389:) 4362:) 4345:) 4328:) 4314:) 4296:) 4267:) 4221:) 4213:. 4198:) 4190:· 4174:) 4154:-- 4140:-- 4129:) 4072:) 4047:) 4027:) 4013:) 3986:— 3969:) 3916:) 3889:32 3850:) 3831:) 3827:• 3819:bl 3816:ee 3813:zw 3785:— 3771:) 3767:• 3759:bl 3756:ee 3753:zw 3735:) 3710:. 3690:) 3666:— 3648:) 3640:. 3615:) 3600:) 3572:) 3568:• 3560:bl 3557:ee 3554:zw 3519:) 3474:) 3441:) 3427:) 3405:) 3390:) 3367:| 3319:) 3273:) 3258:) 3236:) 3222:) 3177:) 3155:-- 3151:. 3088:) 3071:) 3063:-- 2974:) 2959:) 2951:-- 2806:. 2768:) 2761:RA 2710:) 2703:RA 2700:-- 2696:" 2658:) 2651:RA 2608:) 2601:RA 2521:) 2514:RA 2472:) 2465:RA 2462:-- 2429:) 2422:RA 2371:) 2364:RA 2316:) 2268:) 2219:) 2152:) 2078:32 2034:32 1989:32 1927:32 1814:32 1765:) 1761:▪ 1743:, 1695:) 1671:32 1661:-- 1649:) 1645:• 1637:bl 1634:ee 1631:zw 1624:. 1553:is 1540:) 1484:) 1461:) 1447:) 1425:— 1384:) 1380:| 1359:) 1288:) 1266:— 1251:) 1168:) 1147:) 1115:) 1100:) 1068:) 1046:) 1027:) 1019:, 952:) 941:· 924:) 908:) 858:) 843:) 824:) 809:) 793:, 746:) 712:) 697:) 693:• 685:bl 682:ee 679:zw 663:) 620:) 605:) 558:) 544:) 526:) 518:. 514:, 504:) 488:) 468:) 445:) 425:) 371:) 339:) 322:) 304:) 255:) 214:) 199:) 184:) 168:) 120:) 95:→ 5305:( 5285:( 5270:( 5199:( 5185:( 5144:( 5126:( 5106:( 5076:( 5061:( 5042:( 5023:( 4976:( 4953:( 4931:( 4916:( 4895:( 4882:B 4853:( 4834:( 4820:( 4800:( 4785:( 4766:( 4741:( 4723:( 4706:( 4679:( 4661:( 4647:( 4628:( 4605:( 4586:( 4531:( 4498:( 4484:( 4470:( 4451:( 4437:( 4418:( 4403:( 4385:( 4358:( 4341:( 4324:( 4310:( 4292:( 4263:( 4217:( 4194:( 4170:( 4125:( 4103:X 4068:( 4043:( 4023:( 4009:( 3965:( 3945:D 3940:T 3935:H 3912:( 3846:( 3823:( 3810:B 3763:( 3750:B 3731:( 3686:( 3662:— 3644:( 3611:( 3596:( 3564:( 3551:B 3515:( 3470:( 3437:( 3423:( 3401:( 3386:( 3371:) 3363:( 3315:( 3269:( 3254:( 3232:( 3218:( 3173:( 3084:( 3067:( 2970:( 2955:( 2907:D 2902:T 2897:H 2893:– 2850:D 2845:T 2840:H 2793:D 2788:T 2783:H 2764:( 2751:. 2737:D 2732:T 2727:H 2706:( 2679:D 2674:T 2669:H 2654:( 2628:D 2623:T 2618:H 2604:( 2543:D 2538:T 2533:H 2517:( 2497:D 2492:T 2487:H 2468:( 2449:D 2444:T 2439:H 2425:( 2391:D 2386:T 2381:H 2367:( 2342:D 2337:T 2332:H 2312:( 2292:D 2287:T 2282:H 2264:( 2244:D 2239:T 2234:H 2215:( 2187:D 2182:T 2177:H 2173:– 2148:( 2119:X 2058:D 2053:T 2048:H 2015:D 2010:T 2005:H 1968:D 1963:T 1958:H 1914:) 1910:( 1900:D 1895:T 1890:H 1876:X 1849:D 1844:T 1839:H 1790:D 1785:T 1780:H 1757:( 1691:( 1641:( 1628:B 1602:D 1597:T 1592:H 1570:X 1536:( 1480:( 1457:( 1443:( 1404:D 1399:T 1394:H 1376:( 1355:( 1284:( 1262:— 1247:( 1224:— 1212:— 1185:) 1181:( 1179:+ 1164:( 1143:( 1111:( 1104:. 1096:( 1064:( 1042:( 1023:( 1008:) 1006:c 1004:- 1002:t 1000:( 948:( 920:( 904:( 854:( 839:( 820:( 805:( 742:( 708:( 689:( 676:B 659:( 616:( 601:( 583:X 554:( 540:( 522:( 500:( 484:( 464:( 441:( 421:( 375:. 367:( 335:( 318:( 300:( 251:( 210:( 195:( 180:( 164:( 116:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:In the news/Recurring items/Archive 8 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index