33:
110:
Based on my initial review of the evidence to date, I don't see any need to add LtPowers (or anyone else) as an additional party. If that changes as we get closer to a proposed decision, anyone against whom the committee is considering entering sanctions will be notified. Otherwise, Coren is right
91:
It's possible that the arbitrators move to include you in the case if they feel it relevant, although they tend to avoid that when it's not necessary to provide a ruling. I can add you to the case if you beleive that it is required in order for them to get a complete picture; but given that your
58:
I wonder if I should be added to the parties in this case. I was involved in reverting
TransylvanianKarl's reversions, which I persisted in for a while due to the clear and obvious superiority of Xiaphias's version. However, I fell off in monitoring it because it's hard to keep up with someone
92:
involvement is peripheral, it's probably not required. Again, you are quite welcome to make a statement, either by giving evidence or even just by commenting in the workshop to give your perspective, regardless of whether you are a named party or not. —
70:
43:) has graciously offered to provide guidance and help. If a there appears to be a linguistic issue during the case, bringing it to his attention may be worthwhile. —
17:
120:
105:
96:
86:
77:
63:
48:
69:
You need not be named a party to the case to provide evidence; everyone is welcome to provide information that can guide the arbitrators on
82:
I understand that; it's not so much that I have evidence to present, it's just that my conduct may be part of what is reviewed.
116:
39:
Given the stated lack of fluency from one the the participants, an admin on the
Hungarian WP (
112:
32:
102:
83:
60:
40:
71:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/International
Churches of Christ/Evidence
93:
74:
44:
111:that "party" status is not a big deal. Regards,
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for arbitration
8:
101:Thank you; I just wanted to be clear. =)
7:
59:dedicated to continuous reverting.
24:
31:
47:for the Arbitration Committee
1:
145:
54:Statement by User:LtPowers
49:14:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
121:13:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
106:12:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
97:02:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
87:00:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
78:00:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
64:23:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
27:Interpret / translation
136:
35:
144:
143:
139:
138:
137:
135:
134:
133:
56:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
142:
140:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
55:
52:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
141:
122:
118:
114:
109:
108:
107:
104:
100:
99:
98:
95:
90:
89:
88:
85:
81:
80:
79:
76:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
62:
53:
51:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
26:
19:
57:
41:User:Nyenyec
36:
30:
113:Newyorkbrad
37:Clerk note:
103:Powers
84:Powers
61:Powers
94:Coren
75:Coren
73:. —
45:Coren
16:<
117:talk
119:)
115:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
