Knowledge

talk:Content assessment - Knowledge

Source 📝

252: 234: 327: 302: 203: 172: 502:
This is a good point and thanks for bringing it up. While the official guidelines do not contain any requirements on length, it is likely that some editors (and even some automated tools) may be using length as a metric to measure quality. Please feel free to update the assessment on any article that
467:
I get the impression that, in practice, this rating system is biased towards simply measuring the length of an article and making an assessment based on that. Some subjects can be dealt with quite concisely – which is surely what we are trying to achieve with an encyclopaedia article. Quite simply,
383:
seems to fulfil everything required of a B-Class article, except that it's quite short. It seems to be comprehensive within the topic, but I'm not sure if I can put it as B-Class yet. Thoughts?
442: 484: 48: 163: 422:
and it was originally rated as start class, I have now fixed all the Citation needed and Better source needed requests, can it get a better rating because of this?
333: 307: 540:
What are the languages that use the same Knowledge Content assessment system as English? There is no definitive list that I can find in the page here or online.
159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 83: 35: 468:
there may be nothing more that really needs to be added, but we have a complete article that is assessed as "C" or "stub" because it is not very long.
438: 89: 563: 268: 17: 480: 259: 239: 78: 251: 233: 214: 31: 69: 492: 171: 122: 182: 545: 427: 388: 488: 403: 264: 220: 541: 525: 338: 312: 419: 59: 451: 187: 99: 74: 34:
page. Reviews of pages should be in the relevant WikiProject, the article talk page, or in the
423: 384: 55: 399: 184: 549: 529: 521: 515: 496: 476: 456: 431: 407: 392: 186: 510: 557: 446: 437:
Sure. Normally you make a request to one of the relevant projects. In the case of
472: 471:
Articles that appear to me to have been mis-rated based on their length include
520:
I have noticed this as well, so I will second the thank you for bringing it up
326: 301: 380: 506: 536:
List of non-English wikipedias that use same Quality Assessment system
18:
Knowledge talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/A-Class criteria
267:
in general. If you would like to participate, please visit the
196: 188: 26: 443:
Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests
107: 485:
Windermere Jetty: Museum of Boats, Steam and Stories
398:That article needs more references in my opinion 336:, a project which is currently considered to be 348:Knowledge:WikiProject Article quality research 8: 445:. I have re-rated the article as B class. 296: 228: 213:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 298: 230: 503:you think is mis-classified. — Martin 379:The article on the Hebrew concept of 7: 334:the article quality research project 202: 200: 263:, a collaborative effort regarding 219:It is of interest to the following 463:A short article may be appropriate 25: 354:Article quality research articles 332:This page is within the scope of 325: 300: 250: 232: 201: 170: 49:Click here to start a new topic. 30:This page is for discussing the 481:Far Eastern Freight Conference 1: 550:15:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 530:20:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 277:Knowledge:WikiProject Council 46:Put new text under old text. 439:WikiProject Military history 280:Template:WikiProject Council 516:19:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 497:19:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 351:Template:Quality assessment 54:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 580: 97: 564:WikiProject Council pages 457:19:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 432:13:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 414:Reclassifying an article? 408:13:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 393:17:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 320: 257:This page relates to the 245: 227: 84:Be welcoming to newcomers 345:Article quality research 308:Article quality research 269:project discussion page 79:avoid personal attacks 164:Auto-archiving period 418:I wrote the article 420:Great Fires of 1871 375:beged-kefet rating? 260:WikiProject Council 215:content assessment 90:dispute resolution 51: 32:Content assessment 514: 370: 369: 366: 365: 362: 361: 295: 294: 291: 290: 195: 194: 70:Assume good faith 47: 16:(Redirected from 571: 504: 489:ThoughtIdRetired 454: 449: 356: 355: 352: 349: 346: 329: 322: 321: 316: 304: 297: 285: 284: 283:Council articles 281: 278: 275: 254: 247: 246: 236: 229: 206: 205: 204: 197: 189: 175: 174: 165: 110: 27: 21: 579: 578: 574: 573: 572: 570: 569: 568: 554: 553: 538: 495: 477:Ariel (clipper) 465: 452: 447: 416: 377: 353: 350: 347: 344: 343: 310: 282: 279: 276: 273: 272: 191: 190: 185: 162: 116: 115: 114: 113: 106: 102: 95: 65: 36:assessment page 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 577: 575: 567: 566: 556: 555: 537: 534: 533: 532: 518: 491: 464: 461: 460: 459: 415: 412: 411: 410: 376: 373: 368: 367: 364: 363: 360: 359: 357: 330: 318: 317: 305: 293: 292: 289: 288: 286: 255: 243: 242: 237: 225: 224: 218: 207: 193: 192: 183: 181: 180: 177: 176: 118: 117: 112: 111: 103: 98: 96: 94: 93: 86: 81: 72: 66: 64: 63: 52: 43: 42: 39: 38: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 576: 565: 562: 561: 559: 552: 551: 547: 543: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 517: 512: 508: 501: 500: 499: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 469: 462: 458: 455: 450: 444: 440: 436: 435: 434: 433: 429: 425: 421: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 382: 374: 372: 358: 341: 340: 335: 331: 328: 324: 323: 319: 314: 309: 306: 303: 299: 287: 270: 266: 262: 261: 256: 253: 249: 248: 244: 241: 238: 235: 231: 226: 222: 216: 212: 208: 199: 198: 179: 178: 173: 169: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 126: 124: 120: 119: 109: 105: 104: 101: 91: 87: 85: 82: 80: 76: 73: 71: 68: 67: 61: 57: 56:Learn to edit 53: 50: 45: 44: 41: 40: 37: 33: 29: 28: 19: 542:Kingstonacuk 539: 470: 466: 424:Bradinator33 417: 385:Robynfeather 378: 371: 337: 265:WikiProjects 258: 221:WikiProjects 211:project page 210: 167: 121: 473:Alfred Holt 400:Protegmatic 522:Monkeywire 381:Begadkefat 453:(discuss) 108:WT:ASSESS 92:if needed 75:Be polite 558:Category 448:Hawkeye7 441:this is 339:inactive 313:inactive 123:Archives 100:Shortcut 60:get help 487:, etc. 274:Council 240:Council 168:60 days 217:scale. 209:This 88:Seek 546:talk 526:talk 511:talk 507:MSGJ 428:talk 404:talk 389:talk 77:and 493:TIR 560:: 548:) 528:) 509:· 483:, 479:, 475:, 430:) 406:) 391:) 166:: 158:, 154:, 150:, 146:, 142:, 138:, 134:, 130:, 58:; 544:( 524:( 513:) 505:( 426:( 402:( 387:( 342:. 315:) 311:( 271:. 223:: 160:9 156:8 152:7 148:6 144:5 140:4 136:3 132:2 128:1 125:: 62:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/A-Class criteria
Content assessment
assessment page
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Shortcut
WT:ASSESS
Archives
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Council
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Council

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.