546:
contrast, see the list to the right of the page for different theories of crime.) In the
History section, there is attribution, but it deals in a very cursory way with the early modern period (a key period) in a few sentences, before going on to discuss extensively one type (amongst many) of modern theory of crime, not a history of the social development of crime per se in that era, which was the main topic of the section. How modern approaches to crime began to be institutionalized in the 18th century is not discussed. A number of key perspectives are omitted, such as Foucault's poststructuralist analysis of the development of modern disciplinary regimes. And, in the article as a whole, I saw little Marxist or Feminist analysis nor did I see a Frankfurt school perspective nor an environmental criminology perspective. (These are distinct and common notable perspectives on crime and social problems.) I saw little or nothing about white collar crime, corporate crime, war crimes, hate crimes, crimes of passion, or organized crime (though there are links at the bottom to some of these). I didn't see discussions of social processes that shape crime such as patterns of abuse or racial profiling (though links may be there at bottom as there are wikipedia articles on some of these topics). These are serious omissions, which point to the mostly rationalistic, individualistic bias of view of the article -- one perspective among many. The section on "Trial" returns to presenting an unattributed POV generalization. And, I'm not sure that this approach to trials, lifted out of context of the whole criminal justice system, belongs in a Crime article. Next, the outline list that is most of "Reasons" section is unclear and overgeneralized. The closing section on "Classification" is solely U.S.-centric (POV issue again), and seemed to me a poorly presented summary of that. For an overview article, this version has multiple problems. The article has POV issues. It is very uneven and not clearly constructed in general outline and within some sections.
311:
version). We have several of these LAALSH type lists in the intro to the Core topics page, though I confess I was not familiar with WP:VA, thank you for showing me that! (Can I suggest you add in GAs as well?) What we plan to do (I think!) is to have a top level of core topics, then under those come a list of 1000 such as that at WP:VA. Underneath those will come other important articles that will probably be a combination of FAs and articles nominated by individuals and WikiProjects, leading to perhaps 2-3000 for a trial release. We will be re-contacting the WikiProjects again soon to get their lists of key articles.
2519:. You call that "basic"? Yowza. I really don't mean to be harsh, and I apologize if I offend with any of my comments, but the list needs a major overhaul before it can be considered a reliable guide to the "core topics" of Knowledge (XXG); the only realistic justification for not committing to such an overhaul is the arbitrary assumption that old additions are more likely to be good "core topics" than new additions, which experience has demonstrated (and is demonstrating again now) is often an unreliable assumption.
2560:
general yet relevant, and any such list can be regarded as biased. This is based on my experience of looking at many lists, assessing "core" articles and discussing list changes with many others over the last nine months. I would have come up with a very different list if I had written the core list myself, but I don't think it would have been any better, and it's rather refreshing to work on a project with a different perspective than my own.
35:
373:
plus WP:FA, unlike WP:GA, is a community-approved policy/guideline with numerous mirrors on foreign
Wikipedias, which is important for an Interwiki-focused project. I could certainly list the GAs on a separate page, of course, though one problem is that WP:VA and LAALSH aren't yet very stable and have had relatively few editors working on them, so I'd expect a list of GAs to change very rapidly in the next few days.
514:(which may or may not be topics for inclusion). Before proposing again modifying the table by additions and deletions, I was going to wait until discussions about a working preliminary categorization scheme had ended, which are taking some time. Revising the content of the core topics list is an important issue if we are wanting to use the core topics list to focus editing work on the most general articles. --
389:- that sounds a tad too subjective. What topics we do or don't have WikiProjects on (and obviously which ones certain editors nominate) is often arbitrary, and reflects Knowledge (XXG)'s editorial and systemic biases in many areas (e.g. where we have WikiProjects for certain U.S. states, but none for most countries in the world). If you're careful with which articles get in, though, could work.
2333:. As you can see from my comments of a few days ago, I had listed many of the articles you mention for the supplement. Your listing here is an excellent list of articles we "must have" on the CD. I think I would support virtually all of them going into that supplement, which will almost guarantee their inclusion in WP:V0.5. Anything other than incremental changes to our list would open
251:, which similarly seeks to craft a list of especially basic and essential topics (though its list tends to be more expansive and specific in certain ways). I've noticed a lot of very strange decisions, in terms of both what's there and what isn't, for the two lists, so lately I've been trying to revitalize that project with some new ideas, but the editor deficiency on Meta and
566:
review. If it hasn't been done already, think we eventually need or would benefit from at least the above level of "written up" review (especially when revised beyond rough draft form) for all core topics and eventually vital articles (top 1000 articles). Specialist reviews would be even better, when possible. Comments? --
494:. (Note - this outline is a rough draft.) Some of the core topics in this outline seem to fit 5 levels down, hence they seem not to be very core or general. Some very general topics are not included in core topics table, some that you mention. Other instances of very general topics not in the core topics table are
2577:. This supplementary list can include a lot more of the specific topics you mention - I agree we can't have an encyclopedia without Shakespeare, for example! However, we can't have Shakespeare without assessing the article first, would you help us out with assessments? Let's get to work and make a CD! Thanks,
2458:"our general approach has been to have very broad topics at the top of the tree, that gradually get more specific as we fo down." - Then you have failed magnificently in your goals. I just provided nearly 30 examples of clearly not-top-level entries that are still on the list. How can you justify listing
2685:
agree on what's in and what's not, we can get the bot to handle the table. I think Tito has started getting the automation started for the main core topics table. Obviously the supplement table needs a LOT more work. By the way, my exams are over, just marking to do then I'll have a bit more time.
554:
does serve (perhaps inappropriately) as a general portal function, in part (rather incompletely again and with much less text than crime). (I'll revise this review rough draft and move it over to the crime talk page--later.) I wonder if part of the function of
Criminology could be moved to Crime with
399:
at all basic, and there's a clear bias towards certain topics over other topics (e.g., a very large portion of the list is concerned with human recreation, economics, and business, vs. very little on many other areas of encyclopedic topics and fields of knowledge). I'd be fine with helping carve down
2547:
because it's not. Furthermore, the God article is actually pretty mediocre, though I agree that it's better than the deity one right now (which shouldn't matter). A list like this should determine what articles we improve to FA quality; what articles we already have at FA quality shouldn't determine
2314:
I spent a long time reviewing your earlier comments, and on the basis of your comments and those of Vir, I made the (more modest) proposal listed above a week or two back. I think you raised some important things, and many have now been incorporated after a period of discussion and negotiation. At
372:
are currently marked "Good
Articles", but I think that adding GA icons to the page itself at this point would clutter things up a bit too much, and wouldn't provide as clear a distinction as there is between FA and non-FA. Best to keep things relatively simple (and thus much easier to keep updated);
296:
talk page. I'm very interested in seeing a top 1000 (or so) article list which is collectively refined, according to some sort of editorial debate of what are general priorities and principles for core article improvement and organization. So, I'm going to go over to VA and see what's up. Thanks for
1711:
That's great! I was going to suggest we did it, but you've already done that! I think we need to re-assess every article - remember that these assessments are mostly over 6 months old now. I'll post requests for the other Core Topics team members to help out with this, and to add in the template
1244:
If the consensus is "yes" then I will create a list starting with my list from above, and then I will ask people to edit that list, rather than getting into a detailed discussion on a list of 53 articles here. If you have strong views like "No people articles at this level" that's OK here, though.
707:
space, not out of it, for example, just like all planets do; it is our perspective, not an objective fact, which makes it otherwise.) However, "outer space" might be appropriate if we are planning, for example, to have 1,600 entries, rather than the 160 that the page currently specifies. It's all a
197:
We could use tags (formats) for failed GA review and removed from GA list. We may also want tags for failed FA review and dropped from FA list (and candidates for such). If the later, we might need a 3rd column to note FA failed and removed tags as an article could be GA & failed or removed FA.
2684:
Yes, I simply copied over all of the suggestions from various talk pages and pasted them into the page. I started assessing the first few, so that
Silence could understand better what I was doing (and could maybe help out?). I also wanted to set it up in the style that the bot can read. Once we
576:
This is excellent work, Vir, I'm glad you took a look at this. I would suggest you do some major rewriting of that page some time. We will have to include GAs in our beta tests, but maybe things will need to be tightened up a bit before we can rely on them for the "official" 1.0 release. That's
565:
In general, based on looking over many GA articles, I don't think we can rely on the GA rating system for selecting articles to publish in a final fixed media versions, though for beta versions with disclaimers that is fine. But, we can use that system to be looking at articles for improvemetn and
549:
One editing approach: The various key missing topics and extensive POV issues could perhaps could be addressed if Crime were turned into portal article lifting short summaries from other existing articles and pointing to these topics (and to a separate more well developed history article). On this
320:
Regarding the Core Topics, we chose to stick with the basic list rather than get into endless debate about whether or not some particular article should be delisted. When it comes down to such detail, it really gets very subjective. However, we often substitute one thing for some closely related
310:
Your visit is very timely, as I think we are at least considering expanding our list beyond the initial group. It would be great if you (Silence) and Vir + others were to agree on a set for WP:VA, as I think we hope to use a list very much like this before we publish (certainly for the first full
286:
list. I've edited the VA list a bit. It seems the core topics here are rather static for the time being. I suggested additions of some very basic general topics to this core topics list in the last month or two and there wasn't much support for acting on those ideas, at this time. Maybe that will
139:
Based on discussions and points above at the end of the "GA-Class tag -- how to use?" discussion string and based on my experience working with data, I added a new column to distinguish between GA/FA status and 1.0 A/B ect. class. The review processes are quite inconsistent. We don't want to loose
2324:
We had been trying to limit the no. of articles to the 150-160 range, right since 2004, so the changes you propose would change the whole scope of this project. I notice too that many of your articles are more "specific" than our current listing - our general approach has been to have very broad
545:
article and a few other sections read like a poorly written text book in summarizing some views of crime. Only one definition of crime is presented in summary at the top of the "why criminalize" section, without defining it as a point of view. This is a misleading sort of POV generalization. (For
2559:
Then I think we will have to agree to disagree. I really like your list, though, and I would like to enlist your help in assessing a supplement based on them. :To me, it doesn't matter if we call them "List X" and "List Y", I don't think any list can really be both fundamental and yet usable,
201:
Regarding the current table edit (which I proofed 3 times), the new column can be deleted by reverting the page. But, I think the extra column will allow us to easily check for A-class articles which are not GA and B-class that are GA, easing our clean up and evaluation process. Dates on last
885:
This would be one level below the core itself, covering lesser "top level" subjects (mainly fairly general or abstract) and also some important subjects that are very important but less general. The following could be a start, and I have included many that are displaced from the core:
1503:, that's my least favorite core topic, I don't see it as fundamental or important enough for the top 150. Any thoughts on that and the other changes I mentioned? I like the history articles you mention, I'd be happy to see any of them in the core, or at least in the core supplement.
489:
Thanks for your detailed comments. I agree about the inconsistency of the core topics. In playing around with categories, I made several different category outlines. One of these outlines is a 5-level category tree that includes most of the core topics (and some suggested additions):
1319:
Yes, I agree, though I'm not sure how to actually organise that. VA could organise that, only that project is not very active. WVWP will be coordinating the still further levels via contact with projects and with the bot, that may be the best place for subject-specific info.
255:
has made it impossible to find much productive discussion or interest. This place, on the other hand, seems more active. So, (1) where's the proper place to recommend new articles and to dispute the inclusion or form of certain existing ones (e.g.,
246:
I've been curious for a little while now, about whether there would be any possibility of fruitful cross-pollination between this project and the (lately rather inactive, but a good resource to draw from in many ways nonetheless) Interwiki endeavor
2530:
in the supplement, the former is a much stronger article (GA, former FAC)." - God is a type of deity, ergo deity is a higher-level entry than deity, and thus more important from an unbiased perspective. Arguing otherwise is like arguing that
2383:"I notice too that many of your articles are more "specific" than our current listing" - Some are, some aren't. You don't seem to have analyzed my listing very carefully, since you didn't notice how broad a large number of them are:
1291:
Knowledge (XXG) already has a few "core topics" types of lists that mainly differ by the number of articles included. I've been thinking it could make sense for them all to have a naming system and a template to connect them.
2490:
few articles related to the natural world? The current list is so warped that it is nearly useless, and its criteria are clearly arbitrary and inconsistently applied, as demonstrated by the fact that we are OK with including
2315:
this point, I don't think it would be fruitful to hold a long discussion on this new (long!) list which would end in the conclusion, "We have to agree to disagree." I also think that once these topics are incorporated into
1696:, but some of the articles have valid concerns there, so I would recommend they be reassessed. If possible, could someone review the few articles I added (only FAs and A-Classes) to check if they still are at those levels?
2325:
topics at the top of the tree, that gradually get more specific as we fo down. Therefore we can have
Industry, Manufacturing and Finance in place, and below that in the organisational tree we can have articles like
112:
726:
144:
5 articles are rated GA but also B-class in our table. This might be cleaned up by another 1.0 review; but it might be a problem with GA-review. (Note: there were 6 such conflicts in our table until review of
124:
88:
76:
71:
63:
743:
I have trawled through all of the (often insightful) comments by others above, reflected on them, added a few thoughts of my own, and I would like to propose the following changes to our core topics list:
387:"Underneath those will come other important articles that will probably be a combination of FAs and articles nominated by individuals and WikiProjects, leading to perhaps 2-3000 for a trial release."
2570:
198:
That would actually be helpful to know. As numbers of articles on the GA list goes up (and the list is growing daily) and more start to move over to FA, this info would become more an issue.
1229:
The net change to the core would be to reduce the overall number by two articles. There are 53 articles listed as a start for the supplement, I expect this would grow as others add things in.
342:
Thanks for the kind responses! I'm glad you guys are so open to new input despite having so much work done already, and look forward to working together on these distinct but related endeavors.
602:
Thanks for your energy, and I hope you won't be away too long. I understand about priorities, that's why I haven't been able to do so much here as I would like recently! All the best,
21:
1214:
As most of you know, I personally don't have strong view on these issues, but I think the above changes would be useful to WP:1.0. I am trying to put together a core of articles for
232:
was removed from the GA list. We retain our B-class rating by using two columns. With one column, at best, there is the entry of removed from GA list. Now we have both evaluations. --
120:
116:
592:
Other things. I will be taking a break from making regular contributions in this group for a few months or longer. Talk to you later or see you in other
Knowledge (XXG) spaces. --
2337:. Would it be OK with all of the team members to use this new list as the starting point for the supplement? That would allow us to get V0.5 open for nominations next week.
2655:
I'd question the inclusion of Blair, but if you are going to include not only people but people from such recent history, it would seem to be a bit serious-minded to exclude
97:
2573:. I would like to propose that we limit the size of this to 200 articles, giving 350 articles including the original list. Anything more than that should be covered at
2319:, something I hope to do in the next few days, it won't matter whether they are classed as "core" or "core supplement" or "vital articles" except for listing purposes.
400:
a very, very short list of truly essential and general topics, but the current one here seems deficient in that respect in a number of ways. For example, y'all list
2486:, and ridiculously large numbers of society- and economics-related articles (clearly showing a massive systemic bias in the current list), compared to relatively
1222:. Most of the new articles proposed for the supplement are B-Class or better, many are GA or FA. Beyond the core and core supplement, the next level would be
615:
Thanks, I'll drop by from time to time. I'm going to focus on WP review processes and issues for now. As 1.0 ramps up, I might be a more frequent visitor.Ā :) --
633:
108:
51:
17:
2606:
The table makes it hard for me to review the supplement suggestions. Only a few can be seen at a time, so it is hard to consider context and relativity.
1693:
211:
Ps. In table "update" mode, I added "failed GA" in the new GA/FA column to 3 articles that recently failed. I also added GA-class tag to GA artices
181:
3 A-class articles recently failed GA review. (As for 3/13, at least these 3 A-class articles were either failed or were removed from the GA list.
1632:
Thanks! Sounds like a plan, I can go along with all of these. Let's keep hobby, that's quite OK, and I do prefer race to demographics. Cheers,
101:
555:
Crime focusing on being a portal to types and history of crime and
Criminology focusing on theories, methods, and history of that discipline.
393:"we chose to stick with the basic list rather than get into endless debate about whether or not some particular article should be delisted"
491:
395:- Yes, I can see that the list is meant to be very basic because it's so short, but what confused me is that many entries on the list
272:), and (2) would anyone be interested in providing any suggestions or criticisms for the (very-much-)in-development LAALSH project? -
2707:
2689:
2663:
2650:
2627:
2610:
2597:
2581:
2552:
2376:
2341:
1729:
1716:
1705:
1664:
1649:
1636:
1623:
1507:
1482:
1437:
1416:
1378:
1324:
1310:
1296:
1259:
1249:
733:
712:
678:
645:
619:
606:
596:
581:
570:
518:
480:
360:
333:
301:
276:
236:
223:
206:
173:
476:. In other words, the level of detail and "basicness" is extremely inconsistent, in some cases even reflecting unintended bias. -
1384:
I'd rather see the list shorter than longer. (It'd be nice to have a round 150.) But if we're going to add, I'm leaning toward:
128:
2548:
what articles we list here! This list should help correct
Knowledge (XXG)'s systemic biases, not indulge and succumb to them. -
1277:
1499:
I don't want us to feel constrained by a specific no., though it would be nice to have a round 150. I would love to lose
202:
evaluation are needed too, in the far right column. We'll need this comparison process at least for awhile. Comments? --
2042:
562:
a C rating (if we had one), because of POV and lack of generalization issues, by the 1.0 core topics rating system.
353:
1273:
I would see the next level as having 200 - 500 entries. (Not sure either way about the biographies at the moment.)
42:
140:
information about our A/B ratings when coding GA status. I sorted the data into appropriate columns. Consider:
1302:
Elaborating -- My choice at the moment would be for further levels to be more exposed to the wider WP, such as
1270:
I could go for a various levels of core topics, more or less as Martin has called a "core topics supplement".
329:
instead, Maurreen & I both agreed to that. We just never got around to switching that one! Many thanks,
1255:
I'm going to answer you in a couple of parts, but it's easier for me to separate them in different sections.
2173:
1782:
1689:
1134:
149:
today showed it was removed from the GA list. Also, I briefly reviewed the other five GA/B-class articles:
2372:
in the supplement, the former is a much stronger article (GA, former FAC). Maybe Deity should be in VAs?
1700:
1682:
1671:
640:
1918:
1570:
If you want to expand, I'm OK with adding your science suggestions and my history suggestions together:
1475:
1022:
287:
change with ongoing discussion. One can always float ideas. ... Oh, what is the LAALSH project (link)?
2303:
2227:
1958:
1591:
836:
2169:
1183:
1027:
996:
257:
193:
was removed.) Two of the articles were re-classified as B-class; Natural disaster remains A-class.
2500:
2255:
1798:
1062:
632:
I've done one change to the assessment scale, and to keep discussion at one place, see the main
1198:
1057:
2593:
I've created this page, and started assessing
Silence's list. Please help out when you can!
2316:
1219:
1215:
2267:
2146:
1810:
1467:
1426:
1387:
1142:
972:
930:
806:
449:
441:
437:
265:
186:
1238:
If you disagree with a specific proposal, mention it here, and make suggestions as needed.
1826:
1754:
1596:
1393:
1188:
1158:
379:- That sounds very similar to my idea of a 2- or 3-tiered distinction between articles on
2574:
1374:, after brief discussion above. I'd like to think some more about the other suggestions.
1303:
1285:
1223:
380:
377:"a top level of core topics, then under those come a list of 1000 such as that at WP:VA."
369:
349:
293:
283:
252:
248:
169:. Most of these articles have few references. A few are short or have short sections. --
2334:
2326:
2259:
2134:
2130:
2046:
2010:
1898:
1806:
1616:
1606:
1455:
1405:
1359:
1203:
1172:
1148:
1138:
1129:
1102:
977:
945:
832:
461:
352:. (That's the main reason I renamed English Knowledge (XXG)'s version of that list to
2704:
2686:
2660:
2647:
2624:
2607:
2594:
2578:
2492:
2483:
2467:
2463:
2373:
2338:
2330:
2279:
2247:
2215:
2199:
2138:
2086:
2026:
2014:
1726:
1713:
1661:
1646:
1633:
1620:
1504:
1479:
1434:
1413:
1375:
1321:
1307:
1293:
1256:
1246:
1012:
730:
675:
603:
578:
433:
429:
330:
2549:
2540:
2358:
2299:
2271:
2185:
1986:
1934:
1746:
1554:
1532:
1193:
1112:
895:
753:
709:
477:
357:
325:
above) that Library & Info Science wasn't a good choice, and Vir had suggested
273:
182:
538:, I wrote in discussion over on the Good Articles list. This is a rough draft.
2656:
2243:
2181:
2062:
1878:
1850:
1697:
1601:
1399:
1107:
1077:
1007:
935:
696:
664:
637:
551:
469:
326:
219:. (These minor edits can be recreated if table is reverted to remove column.) --
150:
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2644:
The list suggestions are more than 200. I'm working on categorizing the items.
2623:
I'd prefer not to include George Bush and especially Tony Blair at this level.
2471:
2309:
I think what I would like to do is put these into a supplement to core topics.
2287:
2283:
2211:
1978:
1451:
1341:
1177:
1082:
905:
765:
703:(and a convention), not about something that physically exists. (Earth exists
499:
166:
2436:
2142:
2122:
1942:
1938:
1858:
1766:
1762:
1562:
1153:
1002:
987:
982:
821:
739:
Proposals for changes to the core topics list, and formation of a supplement
261:
190:
2348:
Here are just a handful of changes I would propose for folks to comment on:
2659:(considered by most to be the iconic entertainers of the 20th century). --
2645:
228:
Pps. Another case in point for for having multiple columns: Just saw that
2416:
2392:
2384:
2295:
2235:
2219:
2022:
2006:
1994:
1990:
1966:
1926:
1894:
1818:
1794:
1778:
1774:
1758:
1521:
1500:
1371:
1124:
1047:
1042:
1037:
992:
962:
957:
939:
900:
817:
759:
688:
657:
616:
593:
567:
515:
511:
473:
457:
445:
401:
298:
233:
220:
203:
170:
2496:
2479:
2475:
2404:
2263:
2239:
2231:
2223:
2189:
2090:
2066:
2054:
1854:
1846:
1550:
915:
777:
534:
Here is a general "professional" level review of the GA-listed article
421:
269:
212:
158:
2703:
Sounds good. I've consolidated them and have now suggested deletions.
2455:, for example, surely belong as top 150 articles, or very close to it.
727:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Version 1.0 Qualifying
321:
thing after discussing it on this page. For example, we decided (see
2459:
2448:
2444:
2291:
2275:
2207:
2203:
2162:
2158:
2082:
2050:
1962:
1954:
1930:
1922:
1890:
1886:
1870:
1842:
1585:
1579:
1573:
1543:
1067:
967:
864:
858:
852:
507:
503:
495:
229:
146:
2361:
instead - I notice Silence prefers ocean, should we go back to that?
1145:(these are probably seen as more important in Europe than in the US)
368:- If you want I can certainly give you a list of which articles at
2544:
2536:
2532:
2527:
2512:
2508:
2452:
2440:
2428:
2424:
2412:
2400:
2396:
2369:
2354:
2165:
2154:
2150:
2118:
2110:
2102:
2094:
2070:
2058:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2018:
1998:
1982:
1950:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1882:
1874:
1838:
1834:
1822:
1814:
1750:
1558:
1539:
1471:
1459:
1430:
1367:
1347:
1032:
920:
910:
870:
825:
810:
783:
771:
692:
671:
559:
542:
535:
528:
465:
453:
413:
409:
162:
154:
2516:
2504:
2420:
2408:
2388:
2193:
2177:
2126:
2106:
2098:
2078:
2074:
2002:
1974:
1970:
1946:
1866:
1862:
1802:
1790:
1786:
1770:
1528:
1092:
1072:
1052:
729:. Is anyone interested in coordinating the core topics project?
425:
405:
216:
1688:
to serve as a sort of WikiProject "banner" for the purposes of
2523:
2432:
2365:
2251:
2114:
1830:
1463:
1353:
1236:
Should we make the above changes to the main core topics list?
1097:
1087:
1017:
925:
789:
417:
29:
2198:... and I recommend removing most or all of the following:
2462:
as the only game, sport or physical activity on the list,
383:(reflected in the under-development bolding system). Neat.
1660:
Martin, thanks for archiving and for updating the COTF.
1281:
1165:
If we include people besides the religious 3 from above
135:Added column for GA/FA ratings to core topic table
1242:Should we create a core topics supplement at all?
1232:I'd like to ask people to comment on two things:
1306:is, than to just be listed within our project.
1218:, and I'm sure the same will be happening with
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team
1745:... I recommend adding many of the following:
8:
2543:on the list because it's an FA and exclude
381:List of articles all languages should have
350:List of articles all languages should have
249:List of articles all languages should have
102:Knowledge (XXG):Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
1278:Knowledge (XXG):List_of_basic_topic_lists
999:and not include this, under "religions"!)
366:"(Can I suggest you add in GAs as well?)"
1712:as they do each article. Thanks a ton,
346:"Oh, what is the LAALSH project (link)?"
322:
1478:. What do you think about a round 150?
748:Remove from core into a core supplement
292:I'd be happy to dialog with you at the
577:very important to know, thanks a lot!
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
1742:After reviewing the current list...
1474:, we will have 152 on the list (see
699:is not because it is a page about a
1725:Thanks, a template is a good idea.
1390:, among Martin's suggestions, plus
28:
125:Work via WikiProjects discussions
813:(A or B-Class, and a former FAC)
780:(Listed as start, perhaps now B)
708:matter of relative importance. -
109:WP1.0 editorial team discussions
33:
725:I'm going to shift my focus to
348:- Sorry, I got tired of typing
1366:I thought I had already added
541:The first few sections of the
354:Knowledge (XXG):Vital articles
96:This is the talk page for the
1:
1692:. I've added the template to
1210:General comments on the above
1180:(if he's still in office??!)
2723:
2043:People's Republic of China
1690:Mathbot assessment logging
1337:It's OK with me to lose:
1276:We might want to consider
734:19:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
713:17:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
679:17:26, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
646:03:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
628:Change to assessment scale
620:18:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
607:13:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
597:03:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
582:13:17, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
571:20:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
519:16:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
481:04:45, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
361:04:45, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
334:03:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
302:02:45, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
277:01:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
237:23:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
224:21:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
207:20:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
174:23:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
129:Pushing to 1.0 discussions
2539:, or that we should have
2708:03:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
2690:01:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
2664:08:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
2651:22:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
2628:21:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
2611:20:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
2598:20:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
2582:09:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
2553:22:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
2377:21:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
2342:21:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
1730:20:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
1717:15:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
1706:04:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
1665:03:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
1650:03:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
1637:05:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
1624:03:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
1508:04:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
1483:20:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1438:20:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1417:05:11, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1379:04:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1325:03:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
1311:04:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1297:04:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1260:04:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1250:05:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
938:(replaced recently with
881:Create a core supplement
663:If so, should we delete
2535:is more important than
2503:but not with including
2174:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
1783:Biological reproduction
1546:branches from there.Ā :)
1135:Sustainable development
843:Net effect: +1 in core
796:Net effect: -7 in core
2571:new supplementary list
2470:, trivial topics like
1538:I lean toward keeping
1425:I'm OK with replacing
1282:early smaller versions
873:(A?) (Current GA-COTW)
687:As I mentioned above,
282:I'm interested in the
1919:Industrial Revolution
1520:OK, let's get rid of
1333:Possible list changes
1023:Industrial revolution
995:(How could I be from
121:FAs first discussions
117:Wiki sort discussions
46:of past discussions.
2468:Eastern civilization
2464:Western civilization
2304:Western civilization
2228:History of the Earth
1959:Ludwig van Beethoven
1674:}} and reassessments
1592:History of the Earth
837:History of the Earth
695:are both essential;
434:Eastern civilization
430:Western civilization
356:(WP:VA) recently.) -
323:#Information science
2170:William Shakespeare
1615:How about deleting
1226:and related lists.
1184:William Shakespeare
1028:Inorganic chemistry
997:Newcastle upon Tyne
890:Displaced from core
258:information science
100:sub-project of the
2501:mathematical proof
2256:Mathematical proof
1799:Capital punishment
1063:Physical chemistry
2357:, but we adopted
1527:Would you prefer
1199:George Washington
1058:Organic chemistry
492:core topic levels
242:Related projects?
131:
94:
93:
58:
57:
52:current talk page
2714:
2522:"I would prefer
2353:I had suggested
2268:Natural disaster
2147:Vincent van Gogh
1811:Chemical element
1703:
1687:
1681:
1468:Personal finance
1427:Personal finance
1388:History of Earth
1143:Environmentalism
973:Chemical element
931:Personal finance
807:Personal finance
643:
450:Personal finance
442:Chinese language
438:English language
266:personal finance
187:Natural disaster
113:Core topics COTW
107:
85:
60:
59:
37:
36:
30:
2722:
2721:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2590:
2364:I would prefer
1827:Dante Alighieri
1755:Albert Einstein
1740:
1701:
1685:
1679:
1676:
1658:
1597:Ancient history
1450:If we take out
1394:Ancient history
1335:
1280:and especially
1268:
1212:
1189:Albert Einstein
1159:Darfur conflict
883:
877:Net effect: +4
849:
802:
800:Replace in core
750:
741:
723:
653:
641:
630:
590:
532:
297:stopping by, --
244:
137:
81:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2720:
2718:
2701:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2653:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2601:
2600:
2589:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2562:
2561:
2556:
2555:
2520:
2456:
2380:
2379:
2362:
2350:
2349:
2345:
2344:
2327:General Motors
2321:
2320:
2311:
2310:
2260:Modern history
2135:United Nations
2131:United Kingdom
2047:Phase (matter)
2011:Nervous system
1899:George W. Bush
1807:Charles Darwin
1739:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1720:
1719:
1675:
1668:
1657:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1627:
1626:
1617:Nanotechnology
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1607:Modern history
1604:
1599:
1594:
1589:
1583:
1577:
1567:
1566:
1547:
1536:
1525:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1466:, and replace
1456:Historiography
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1420:
1419:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1406:Modern history
1403:
1397:
1391:
1364:
1363:
1360:Historiography
1357:
1351:
1345:
1334:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1314:
1313:
1286:Vital Articles
1267:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1211:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1204:Mahatma Gandhi
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1175:
1173:George W. Bush
1169:
1168:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1149:World Wide Web
1146:
1139:sustainability
1132:
1130:Global warming
1127:
1121:
1120:
1119:Topical issues
1116:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1103:Thermodynamics
1100:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1000:
990:
985:
980:
978:Climate change
975:
970:
965:
960:
954:
953:
949:
948:
946:Historiography
943:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
892:
891:
882:
879:
875:
874:
868:
862:
856:
848:
845:
841:
840:
833:Historiography
829:
814:
801:
798:
794:
793:
787:
781:
775:
769:
763:
757:
749:
746:
740:
737:
722:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
682:
681:
670:Should we add
668:
661:
656:Should we add
652:
651:Universe, etc.
649:
634:project's talk
629:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
610:
609:
589:
586:
585:
584:
531:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
484:
483:
462:Earth sciences
390:
384:
374:
363:
343:
339:
338:
337:
336:
315:
314:
313:
312:
305:
304:
289:
288:
243:
240:
195:
194:
178:
177:
136:
133:
92:
91:
86:
79:
74:
69:
66:
56:
55:
38:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2719:
2710:
2709:
2706:
2691:
2688:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2665:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2652:
2649:
2646:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2629:
2626:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2612:
2609:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2602:
2599:
2596:
2592:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2569:and create a
2568:
2565:I'm going to
2564:
2563:
2558:
2557:
2554:
2551:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2494:
2493:biotechnology
2489:
2485:
2484:entertainment
2481:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2381:
2378:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2351:
2347:
2346:
2343:
2340:
2336:
2335:Pandora's Box
2332:
2331:Barclays Bank
2328:
2323:
2322:
2318:
2313:
2312:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2280:Personal life
2277:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2249:
2248:Manufacturing
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2216:Ethnic groups
2213:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2200:Biotechnology
2196:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2167:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2139:United States
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2087:Sigmund Freud
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2027:Pablo Picasso
2024:
2020:
2016:
2015:New York City
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1743:
1737:
1731:
1728:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1718:
1715:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1704:
1699:
1695:
1694:several pages
1691:
1684:
1678:I've created
1673:
1669:
1667:
1666:
1663:
1655:
1651:
1648:
1644:
1643:
1638:
1635:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1625:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1587:
1584:
1581:
1578:
1575:
1572:
1571:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1523:
1519:
1518:
1509:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1484:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1439:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1418:
1415:
1412:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1395:
1392:
1389:
1386:
1385:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1370:, along with
1369:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1346:
1343:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1332:
1326:
1323:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1295:
1289:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1274:
1271:
1265:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1248:
1243:
1239:
1237:
1233:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1209:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1013:Globalization
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
998:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
959:
956:
955:
951:
950:
947:
944:
941:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
893:
889:
888:
887:
880:
878:
872:
869:
866:
863:
860:
857:
854:
851:
850:
847:Add into core
846:
844:
838:
834:
830:
827:
823:
820:(Start) with
819:
815:
812:
809:(Start) with
808:
804:
803:
799:
797:
791:
788:
785:
782:
779:
776:
773:
770:
767:
764:
761:
758:
755:
752:
751:
747:
745:
738:
736:
735:
732:
728:
720:
714:
711:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
685:
684:
683:
680:
677:
673:
669:
666:
662:
659:
655:
654:
650:
648:
647:
644:
639:
635:
627:
621:
618:
614:
613:
612:
611:
608:
605:
601:
600:
599:
598:
595:
588:Working on...
587:
583:
580:
575:
574:
573:
572:
569:
563:
561:
558:I would give
556:
553:
547:
544:
539:
537:
530:
526:
520:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
378:
375:
371:
367:
364:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
341:
340:
335:
332:
328:
324:
319:
318:
317:
316:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
300:
295:
291:
290:
285:
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
250:
241:
239:
238:
235:
231:
226:
225:
222:
218:
214:
209:
208:
205:
199:
192:
189:were failed.
188:
184:
180:
179:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
142:
141:
134:
132:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
103:
99:
90:
87:
84:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
67:
65:
62:
61:
53:
49:
45:
44:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
2702:
2566:
2541:mercantilism
2487:
2359:oceanography
2300:Trigonometry
2272:Oceanography
2197:
2186:World War II
1987:Michelangelo
1935:Isaac Newton
1747:Adolf Hitler
1744:
1741:
1738:More changes
1677:
1659:
1588:(start or B)
1555:Oceanography
1533:Demographics
1365:
1336:
1290:
1275:
1272:
1269:
1241:
1240:
1235:
1234:
1231:
1228:
1213:
1194:Isaac Newton
1113:World War II
896:Demographics
884:
876:
867:(start or B)
842:
795:
754:Demographics
742:
724:
704:
700:
631:
591:
564:
557:
548:
540:
533:
527:A review of
396:
392:
386:
376:
365:
345:
245:
227:
210:
200:
196:
183:Demographics
138:
106:
95:
82:
47:
41:
2657:The Beatles
2244:Linguistics
2182:World War I
2063:Renaissance
1879:Fossil fuel
1851:Electricity
1602:Middle Ages
1557:instead of
1400:Middle Ages
1266:Core levels
1137:or perhaps
1108:World War I
1078:Renaissance
1008:Gender role
936:Outer space
697:Outer space
665:Outer space
552:Criminology
470:Outer space
327:Information
151:Agriculture
98:CORE TOPICS
40:This is an
22:Core topics
2588:Supplement
2472:recreation
2288:Recreation
2284:Publishing
2212:Employment
1979:Metabolism
1683:core topic
1672:core topic
1549:How about
1476:my sandbox
1452:Heuristics
1342:Heuristics
1178:Tony Blair
1083:Revolution
906:Heuristics
839:(A-Class?)
828:(Start/B?)
766:Heuristics
500:Experience
167:Statistics
2437:transport
2143:Vegetable
2123:Transport
1943:Karl Marx
1939:Jerusalem
1859:Evolution
1767:Aristotle
1763:Amphibian
1563:Continent
1154:Petroleum
1003:Free will
988:Evolution
983:Democracy
835:(B) with
824:(B?) and
822:Continent
768:(B-Class)
762:(B-Class)
756:(B-Class)
262:reference
191:Sculpture
89:ArchiveĀ 8
83:ArchiveĀ 7
77:ArchiveĀ 6
72:ArchiveĀ 5
64:ArchiveĀ 1
2705:Maurreen
2687:Walkerma
2661:kingboyk
2648:Maurreen
2625:Maurreen
2608:Maurreen
2595:Walkerma
2579:Walkerma
2482:but not
2466:and not
2417:infinity
2393:Big Bang
2385:alphabet
2374:Walkerma
2339:Walkerma
2296:Theorems
2236:Industry
2220:Festival
2023:Organism
2007:Mountain
1995:Molecule
1991:Military
1967:Marriage
1927:Infinity
1895:Genetics
1819:Cold War
1795:Calendar
1779:Big Bang
1775:Bacteria
1759:Alphabet
1727:Maurreen
1714:Walkerma
1662:Maurreen
1647:Maurreen
1634:Walkerma
1621:Maurreen
1522:Gambling
1505:Walkerma
1501:gambling
1480:Maurreen
1435:Maurreen
1414:Maurreen
1376:Maurreen
1372:Universe
1322:Walkerma
1308:Maurreen
1294:Maurreen
1257:Maurreen
1247:Walkerma
1125:Iraq War
1048:Monarchy
1043:Muhammad
1038:Literacy
993:Football
963:Big bang
958:Alphabet
940:universe
901:Gambling
831:Replace
818:Landform
816:Replace
805:Replace
760:Gambling
731:Maurreen
689:Universe
676:Maurreen
658:Universe
604:Walkerma
579:Walkerma
512:Universe
474:Universe
472:but not
464:but not
458:Currency
452:but not
446:Alphabet
440:but not
432:but not
424:but not
408:but not
402:landform
331:Walkerma
20: |
2567:be bold
2550:Silence
2497:museums
2480:leisure
2476:hobbies
2405:emotion
2317:WP:V0.5
2264:Museums
2240:Leisure
2232:Hobbies
2224:Finance
2190:Writing
2091:Slavery
2067:Reptile
2055:Plastic
1855:Emotion
1847:Disease
1582:(start)
1551:Geology
1542:-- and
1220:WP:V1.0
1216:WP:V0.5
916:Museums
861:(start)
792:(Start)
786:(Start)
778:Museums
774:(Start)
710:Silence
550:topic,
478:Silence
422:biology
358:Silence
274:Silence
270:hobbies
213:Drawing
159:Physics
43:archive
2460:Soccer
2451:, and
2449:weight
2445:weapon
2292:Soccer
2276:Optics
2208:Crafts
2204:Botany
2163:Weight
2159:Weapon
2083:Russia
2051:Planet
1963:Mammal
1955:London
1931:Insect
1923:Infant
1891:Galaxy
1887:Fungus
1871:Flower
1843:Desert
1656:Thanks
1586:Nature
1580:Matter
1574:Energy
1544:Soccer
1458:, and
1068:Planet
968:Buddha
865:Nature
859:Matter
853:Energy
721:Status
510:, and
508:Matter
504:Energy
496:Nature
397:aren't
230:Number
147:Number
2575:WP:VA
2545:trade
2537:Islam
2533:Bible
2528:Deity
2513:metal
2509:wheel
2453:wheel
2441:water
2429:speed
2425:metal
2413:force
2401:death
2397:color
2370:Deity
2355:ocean
2166:Wheel
2155:Water
2151:Virus
2119:Tokyo
2111:State
2103:Speed
2095:Sleep
2071:River
2059:Plato
2039:Peace
2035:Paris
2031:Paper
2019:Ocean
1999:Month
1983:Metal
1951:Light
1915:India
1911:Homer
1907:Grass
1903:Glass
1883:Fruit
1875:Force
1839:Deity
1835:Death
1823:Color
1815:Child
1751:Adult
1559:Ocean
1540:Hobby
1472:Money
1470:with
1460:Party
1431:Money
1429:with
1402:, and
1368:Earth
1356:, and
1348:Party
1304:WP:VA
1224:WP:VA
1033:Jesus
921:Party
911:Hobby
871:Earth
826:Ocean
811:Money
784:Party
772:Hobby
693:Earth
672:Earth
560:Crime
543:Crime
536:Crime
529:Crime
466:Earth
454:Money
414:water
410:ocean
370:WP:VA
294:WP:VA
284:WP:VA
253:WP:VA
163:Sound
155:Crime
16:<
2517:life
2505:fire
2499:and
2495:and
2488:very
2478:and
2474:and
2421:life
2409:fire
2389:atom
2194:Year
2178:Wood
2127:Tree
2107:Star
2099:Soul
2079:Rome
2075:Rock
2003:Moon
1975:Meat
1971:Mass
1947:Life
1867:Fish
1863:Fire
1803:Cell
1791:Book
1787:Bird
1771:Atom
1698:Tito
1576:(B?)
1561:and
1553:and
1529:Race
1093:Star
1073:Race
1053:Moon
855:(B?)
701:term
691:and
638:Tito
426:life
406:park
404:and
217:Film
215:and
185:and
2526:to
2524:God
2515:or
2433:sun
2368:to
2366:God
2329:or
2252:Map
2115:Sun
1831:Day
1531:to
1464:Pet
1354:Pet
1288:.
1284:of
1141:or
1098:Sun
1088:Sea
1018:God
952:New
926:Pet
790:Pet
617:Vir
594:Vir
568:Vir
516:Vir
456:or
444:or
418:sea
416:or
412:or
299:Vir
234:Vir
221:Vir
204:Vir
171:Vir
111:ā
2511:,
2507:,
2447:,
2443:,
2439:,
2435:,
2431:,
2427:,
2423:,
2419:,
2415:,
2411:,
2407:,
2403:,
2399:,
2395:,
2391:,
2387:,
2302:,
2298:,
2294:,
2290:,
2286:,
2282:,
2278:,
2274:,
2270:,
2266:,
2262:,
2258:,
2254:,
2250:,
2246:,
2242:,
2238:,
2234:,
2230:,
2226:,
2222:,
2218:,
2214:,
2210:,
2206:,
2202:,
2192:,
2188:,
2184:,
2180:,
2176:,
2172:,
2168:,
2161:,
2157:,
2153:,
2149:,
2145:,
2141:,
2137:,
2133:,
2129:,
2125:,
2121:,
2117:,
2113:,
2109:,
2105:,
2101:,
2097:,
2093:,
2089:,
2085:,
2081:,
2077:,
2073:,
2069:,
2065:,
2061:,
2057:,
2053:,
2049:,
2045:,
2041:,
2037:,
2033:,
2029:,
2025:,
2021:,
2017:,
2013:,
2009:,
2005:,
2001:,
1997:,
1993:,
1989:,
1985:,
1981:,
1977:,
1973:,
1969:,
1965:,
1961:,
1957:,
1953:,
1949:,
1945:,
1941:,
1937:,
1933:,
1929:,
1925:,
1921:,
1917:,
1913:,
1909:,
1905:,
1901:,
1897:,
1893:,
1889:,
1885:,
1881:,
1877:,
1873:,
1869:,
1865:,
1861:,
1857:,
1853:,
1849:,
1845:,
1841:,
1837:,
1833:,
1829:,
1825:,
1821:,
1817:,
1813:,
1809:,
1805:,
1801:,
1797:,
1793:,
1789:,
1785:,
1781:,
1777:,
1773:,
1769:,
1765:,
1761:,
1757:,
1753:,
1749:,
1702:xd
1686:}}
1680:{{
1670:{{
1645:)
1619:?
1462:,
1454:,
1433:.
705:in
674:?
642:xd
636:.
506:,
502:,
498:,
468:,
460:,
448:,
436:,
428:,
420:,
268:,
264:,
260:,
165:,
161:,
157:,
153:,
127:ā
123:ā
119:ā
115:ā
104:.
68:ā
1565:?
1535:?
1524:.
1408:.
1396:,
1362:.
1350:,
1344:,
942:)
667:?
660:?
176:)
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.