2351:
placed tags on the
Integrable article to call attention to the difficulty I believe all readers except those with math degrees will have understanding it. As I mentioned in my comment on the article Talk page, I can accept the highly technical nature of the text in the article body, but I firmly believe that the first sentence (or two) of the article can and should be written in plain English, so that even readers with nothing more than high school math (not including calculus) can understand what the article is about, even if they understand almost none of the details. I would like to invite any member of this Project to have a go at revising the article lead (lede)--even just the first sentence--in order to give the general reader a clear idea of the meaning of "integrable" as it is intended in the article. With such an improvement, I would be glad to remove the unpleasant 'incomprehensible' tag, which I added. Of course, anyone can remove it at any time, but I hope that will happen only after the first sentence is translated into a form of English that requires no specialized knowledge or prerequisites.
2458:(I will continue the discussion on the wording of the new opening sentences in the article talkpage). Here is a more general comment: I think this is a matter of the target audience. The article is intended for the audience who knows integration and differential equations; thus, there is no much value making the opening sentences accessible to those who do not have such a background. The accessibility is important but it is important to know "accessible" to who. --
40:
3529:
3281:. (The user in question has been unilaterally making this change over dozens if not hundreds of articles on scientists, and is very abrasive about it. It seems deeply wrongheaded to me to put the postnomial in the lead sentence of the article, and moderately wrongheaded to put it into the infobox, but more discussion is needed than just two of us reverting each other.) --
1576:(which was simply deleted with no discussion/review and it's not the one started by me). Basically these are the instances that Knowledge has slowly been taken over by editors who are interested in other than building an encyclopedia. It is just not possible for them to distinguish between building an encyclopedia and disrupting Knowledge, their playground. --
1889:
2515:(ec) I agree about the right location for the more specific conversation. About the general point: there is no reason that an article whose details cannot be understood without a background in differential equations should not contain three sentences that are understandable by anyone. (Very many math articles on Knowledge could be improved this way) --
2206:
encyclopedia I'm aware of uses the imperative mood freely to simplify the ecposition, just like a mathematics paper or textbook would. And, unless there is some specific style guide about writing mathematics encyclopedias that makes recommendations contrary to popular writing styles, our default position really ought to be to follow standard norms.
1555:, over the redirect. I think this episode is a good illustration of the uselessness of Knowledge drafts — most regular editors of draft space view the whole idea of drafts as a trap to keep the spammers busy and away from actual articles, rather than a useful pathway for new content to be included in the encyclopedia. —
1950:
the first-person. By pronouncing "we," you also create an implied (but mostly superficial) personal tone to
Knowledge that I think is inappropriate for the setting. Stylistically, it just seems off -- not because first-person is used in a personal sense, but because it's connotation "smells" of personal sense.
2367:, and the target article uses integrability for defining a foliation. So the definition seems to be circular. Although not a specialist of this subject, I'll add an intuitive definition in the first sentence. Not absolutely sure that is formally correct, but it will certainly better than the present lead.
3296:
I agree, both generally and very specifically in this case. Paul received many honors throughout his lifetime and it appeared to me that he didn't revel in any of them. To stick this postnomial in the lead seems to be saying much more about the Royal
Academy than it does about Paul. I could see it in
2529:
After edit conflict: I do not think it should be impermissible for mathematics articles to include content for specialists. But I also do not think it should be impermissible for mathematics articles to include content for non-specialists. It is the second thing that is relevant here (but then we are
3382:
I probably have removed most of them now (based on his recent edit history). However apparently there is at least one similar template for
Canadian science society. So I'm wondering for what purpose those templates were created in the first place other then sticking them in the lead. If the lead was
3335:
I agree as well, in fact i dislike that template in general. If there is an important honour, that needs to be in the lead for some reason, then it should be written explicitly in regular text, instead of cryptic abbreviation in a special font. Moreover common practice is to handle such honours with
2190:
Perhaps so. I guess the question then should really be about standard mathematical encyclopedic writing ;-) The style appropriate for mathematical journal articles, and mathematical textbook writing, for example, (the kind which I presume most of us here are most familiar), should not necessarily be
1978:
I'd say not using "we" is in doubt preferred due to sounding more "encylopedic" and matching the language use in most math encylopedias or lexicons. However if some editor uses it, it certainly isn't NPOV violation or big oroblem, but rather marginal style issue that other editors are free to fix if
1365:
At first glance, the topic looks notable, appearing the different econometric and economic textbooks over the years. The draft is fairly rough with no lede or much context. But with sources already in the article and some technical content already in place, this could be a stub that others build on.
2544:
Specifics need to be worked out in the article talkpage. But, generally speaking, "I am" (the others might not) against the inclusion of general info peripheral to the topic itself; because the real estate in the lede is expensive and a better approach is to having links to background materials. --
2350:
I recently encountered the article named by the above heading. Before long, I found my way to this
Project and saw the FAQ, which quite well reflects several of my concerns about WP articles on technical subjects and mathematics. I am college-educated, but majored in English, not math or science. I
2289:
What is bad about that usage? It emphasizes that the claim is a necessary truth, something that follows logically from previous assumptions, rather than merely being a contingent truth about some specific example that might have been chosen. Although this distinction between "is" and "must" is used
3079:
expressions. This was the default a few years ago which produces PNG images, now we have a hybrid solution with uses MathJax in the backend to produce svg images and sometimes xml. There is still some legacy from texvc as it is used in the frist parsing step of the current engine. This means there
2577:
I agree "accessibility" is a real problem; if not, why do we constantly get this type of complaints? I (and the others) just don't agree with the solutions proposed thus far; e.g., the insertion of info amounts to defining France in the Paris article. A problem can exist without a solution (and we
2443:
If France is a highly technical term then "Paris is a city in Europe" is probably a better first sentence than "Paris is a city in France." Lead sections of articles consist of sometimes even several paragraphs; there is plenty of possibility to mention France some time after the first sentence. I
2272:
This is the logical "must", not the normative "must". "John must understand the
Riemann zera function, or he couldn't have written about it so clearly." That doesn't mean John has an obligation or need to acquire knowledge of the Riemann zeta function; rather it means there can be no doubt that he
1949:
I think first-person should be vetoed in mathematics articles within regular prose. It starkly contrasts with the tone of the rest of the STEM articles around
Knowledge -- Knowledge is not an academic journal or a conference, but an encyclopedia. Encyclopedias, even from other settings, do not use
2095:
be avoided, even if someone devises a way to eliminate all imperative verbs). But I've seen editors seriously insist that this imperative mood is inconsistent with encyclopedic writing, and call mathematics articles "essay-like" for this reason alone. It may be worth pointing out somewhere that
1920:
I used to occasionally come across notices at the top of articles on mathematics saying the article is written like a personal reflection or essay, and I wondered why, since I didn't see anything in the article that looked like that. Ultimately I found out that it was because of things like this:
2205:
I think too much is made over the distinction between "encyclopedic mathematical writing" and "mathematical writing". I disagree that writing in shorter simple, declarative sentences in an imperative mood is at all incompatible incompatible with writing mathematics in an encyclopedia. Every
2709:
Congratulations on getting this accepted in the inaugural issue of the WikiJournal. Its good to see a math article among the science articles there. I could see this as a useful alternative or adjunct to a GA run, with a little academic credit for your effort. How did you find the peer review
1832:
Since I only skimmed the pages, it is possible that some may not be notable and in that case, they need to be nominated for deletion. (To repeat the above thread, these pages would have been deleted quietly; unfortunately, in current practice (not policy), that pages need some more work means
1852:
I find that mathematics is often written in first person in a way that other subjects are not. It's something I like / have gotten used to (or at least is professional in a mathematical context), but I sometimes get told that it creates an inappropriate tone or violates neutral point of view
2385:
Thank you for your effort to improve the lede. I did a little more research. Most internet searches led me back to various
Knowledge articles, but also a couple of Britannica articles. Using that information, I have revised the lede to provide a very brief opening explanation that I hope is
2037:
publicists made this the "pluralis modestiae", and the Eds detected how embracing a socializing "we" might sound (we all now understand blabla), setting aside all the vulnerability of the Aspies, who were the only ones able to follow their lines of abstraction, and now feel pocketed by this
2728:
Thank you. The peer review process was excellent. Surely it was difficult to get refereed such article. Mathematicians are experienced to referee articles intended for mathematicians, not like this. However, Gaëtan Borot did it very good. His referee report is publicly available:
2444:
don't think DonFB's attempt was perfect (it went from very accessible to heavily technical but skipped over a stage that might be appropriate for, say, an undergraduate math major), but the accessibility was a positive feature that we need more of in mathematics articles. --
2835:
2139:
could begin with a sentence like "Let X be a compact space." That's true regardless of whether the paragraph is part of a proof, a theorem, or just a paragraph discussing specific results. But the real question is, even if imperative constructions could be avoided
2476:
math article needs to meet this standard; Knowledge is after all meant as a resource from which the readers can learn the topic quickly but with some depth, among the others (Knowledge articles are also meant to be useful to those who know the subject already). --
2032:
of this form?). "I, Gauß, princeps mathematicorum, declare herewith" some fundamental theorem, sounds a bit unacceptable. Majestic preponderance seduced to (let) invent the "pluralis majestatis" (We, by God's authority, declare blabla to be true). More
2635:
2117:. Otherwise, it may generally avoided, and this provides often a better style (that is easier to understand). In the above example, if the sentence that follows is the statement of a property, the phrase may be changed into ""If
2847:
3237:
The first step in the project will involve deprecating the old syntax and running a bot or semi-automated edits to change the syntax. These should not result in any visible change to the pages. The bot doing the work is
2082:
Something else occurred to me, after reading Purgy's comment. Apart from issues with the first person plural that some readers find problematic, mathematics is largely written in an imperative mood, such as:
2412:. Saying Paris is city in Europe is true but not mentioning France at all is a serious omission, even when France is highly technical term. (I’m not an expert so it’s better if some experts can jump in). —-
1594:
section of the fundamental group article. Personally, I feel that a separate article is warranted, but the way content is forked off of an existing article is not usually done through draft space. See
2007:
to rephrase the first person if possible. However, the first-person is a widespread stylistic convention in how reliable sources write about mathematics. So I think it is a valid stylistic choice.
1965:
I agree. While it sounds fine to me in a mathematics paper, it definitely sounds wrong in an encyclopedia article. And it does not surprise me that these different venues should have different tones.
1615:(Just so there is no misunderstanding I didn’t start the draft.) The issue I have is drafts like these are somehow invisible to the wider community and usually get deleted quietly. Another example is
2328:
here -- I think "must", although perhaps a little bit out of tone, is grounded in the sense that usage of the words can often have a 1:1 correspondence with the logical "implication" operator: (→). -
63:
2955:
2667:
for a few days now, but as a result the article has ended up looking very fragmented and written in shaky
English. It's certainly an article that could use some improvement if anyone is interested.
1655:
the draftspace. (That’s actually a part of the reason I don’t want to just stay away from the draftspce, since that space need to be integrated to the
Knowledge proper and I can be a conduit.) —-
1486:
1935:
The word "we" was being construed literally by unthinking people who labeled article as essay-like for that reason alone and nothing else. You can't get much more inattentive than to do that.
1337:
2308:
And given that those articles are read by pupils, students or people with limited mathematical background, I don't see any issue with emphasizing here, on the contrary it might be helpful.--
1422:
describes a real, but niche journal, it's difficult for me outside of JCS access etc. to assess notability. Ping me if anyone has any thoughts about notability here. Thanks in advance, --
2663:, an article that has been expanded by a few SPAs (who may be operating together) with mostly copyright-infringing content. I've been chopping out the text that's directly copied from
2144:, are they actually avoided in standard mathematical writing? That seems more important in dictating our practices here than whether it is possible to develop novel writing styles.
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
883:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
2984:
2960:
2940:
2877:
2235:
Something is worse than the use of the first person, and is, nevertheless, widely used in Knowledge. It is the use "must" with a mathematical object as a subject. For example, so "
2255:, which contains several other examples. This use of "must" is so common in articles about elementary mathematics, that I had to look on only two articles for finding an example.
3545:
3266:
3502:
1157:
1102:
1043:
988:
933:
878:
823:
768:
713:
658:
603:
548:
493:
438:
383:
328:
273:
218:
163:
108:
25:
3467:
1692:
1529:
56:
1305:
could use some more eyes. There's a new editor edit-warring to insert what looks like original research to me, but I'd welcome the opinion of other experienced editors. —
2730:
2409:
1283:
one sees that this is currently one of four mathematics articles currently nominated for "Good article" status. Writing a review of any of them would be a contribution.
1257:
3253:
syntax. Eventually the texvc part will be removed completely and there may be some slight change to the rendered output. The main discussion of the project happens at
102:
98:
94:
90:
3416:
1292:
1269:
3583:
21:
1619:, which also got quietly deleted without a proper review. Forking a section of an existing article is allowed and the draftspace is a place to work that out. —-
1651:
The only way for an anonymous user to start an article is through the draftspace and that’s already the reason enough the community (math or otherwise) need to
1536:
to be declined. Editors who understand these topics are invited to contribute to the linked discussion where their input is likely to be significantly helpful.
49:
1320:
Thanks for pointing that out. The first line of their argument is obviously wrong — the logic doesn't follow, and just looking at the figure, it can't even be
2805:
2800:
2733:(and some more reports are also there). The three advanced sections by Ozob are written in response to reports of referees and the editor Sylvain Ribault.
2472:
In other words, "even readers with nothing more than high school math (not including calculus) can understand what the article is about". I disagree that
2042:
have this and that Capitalized Acronyms after a colon ...", prominently used to rebuff values not along some imaginative guidelines of the ruling class (
3486:
3319:) seem to agree as well and have undone some of the mess. Probably someone will have to go through systematically at some point to fully clean up. --
1790:
2795:
2790:
2691:
3477:
Belatedly, I wanted to record the fact that the sock-puppet situation involved a disruptive troll, and in particular Bueller 007 was cleared. --
17:
1206:
1202:
1198:
3539:, which is within the scope of this wikiproject, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the
1419:
3550:
1750:
1727:
1344:
1695:. Input from editors who understand the topic would be of significant benefit - please comment there to keep discussion in one place.
1616:
1490:
1280:
1261:
1250:
2631:
1485:
You spelled his first name one way in the section heading above and another way in the link. Putting the "e" before the "a" is rare.
1302:
3564:
3365:
2252:
2028:(Sorry, I've recently been introduced to this symbol) Maybe there never was a time when using 1.pers.sing. was widely accepted (is
1745:
2988:
2964:
2944:
2881:
3535:
3520:
2408:
I don’t mean to be mean but the new lead doesn’t seem to be precise enough to me; I think it’s much better to have a link to
2213:
2151:
2103:
2014:
1606:
3297:
an infobox, listed under honors, but not immediately under his name as if this is the most important thing about him. --
2096:
mathematics largely must be written in this way, and that the use of first person plural is compatible with that mood.
3569:
3514:
3442:
3428:
3410:
3392:
3377:
3345:
3328:
3306:
3290:
3057:
3039:
3015:
2992:
2968:
2948:
2908:
2885:
2824:
2773:
2759:
2742:
2719:
2703:
2676:
2647:
2601:
2587:
2572:
2554:
2539:
2524:
2486:
2467:
2453:
2438:
2421:
2395:
2376:
2337:
2317:
2303:
2282:
2264:
2217:
2198:
2185:
2171:
2155:
2130:
2107:
2074:
2060:
2018:
1988:
1972:
1959:
1944:
1914:
1902:
1867:
1856:
Do we have a consensus on what I would assume is something that's been discussed here before? I would like to nominate
1842:
1731:
1704:
1664:
1646:
1628:
1610:
1585:
1564:
1545:
1508:
1494:
1479:
1450:
1428:
1403:
1389:
1375:
1359:
1314:
3024:
2919:
1238:
2056:
1775:
1573:
1325:
1810:
1815:
1715:
2207:
2145:
2097:
2008:
1600:
1217:
3540:
3510:
3242:
which is currently seeking approval. Changes will also be made to the Visual Editor to produce the new syntax.
2592:
Haha, JBL, they are indeed. I plan to return to the issue, here and elsewhere. (Attack of the English majors!)
2299:
1826:
1560:
1310:
3482:
3438:
3406:
3324:
3286:
3053:
3048:
is only a definition. If there's not more to say about it, then there's no reason for the article to exist.
2820:
2568:
2535:
2520:
2449:
2278:
1940:
1723:
1446:
1288:
1265:
3006:
that has also been called H-matrix. If it is not the case, you are welcome for writing a lacking article.
2583:
2550:
2482:
2463:
2417:
1838:
1660:
1642:
1624:
1581:
1385:
1355:
3561:
3543:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
3463:
3359:
3311:
This was my feeling exactly -- says much more about RS than about the recipients. Several other users (
2843:
2780:
2715:
2195:
2168:
2052:
1969:
1911:
1880:
1800:
1795:
1780:
1399:
1371:
1333:
3246:
1637:
stopped contributing presumably because, like me, he felt content development is no longer valued. —-
3262:
2980:
2957:
2936:
2926:
2873:
1821:
1785:
1765:
1591:
1464:
1426:
3506:
3239:
3035:
2904:
2687:
2643:
2325:
2295:
1997:
1755:
1700:
1688:
1596:
1556:
1541:
1504:
1475:
1306:
3478:
3434:
3402:
3320:
3302:
3282:
3049:
3011:
2816:
2564:
2531:
2516:
2445:
2372:
2274:
2260:
2126:
1936:
1770:
1719:
1442:
1284:
1223:
1380:
Okay. I moved this to mainspace. It needs categories, which I am wholly unqualified to supply.
3045:
3020:
2974:
2579:
2546:
2478:
2459:
2426:
2413:
2344:
2333:
1955:
1834:
1656:
1638:
1620:
1577:
1525:
1438:
1381:
1351:
2065:
I'd rather argue that "we" shouldn't pester WP authors too much with rather marginal stuff.--
3556:
3459:
3388:
3355:
3341:
2893:
2854:
2839:
2836:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Mathematics
2769:
2755:
2738:
2711:
2699:
2313:
2192:
2181:
2165:
2070:
1984:
1966:
1908:
1864:
1395:
1367:
1329:
1221:
1219:
39:
2160:
The question here is not really about "standard mathematical writing", but rather standard
3316:
3258:
3003:
2861:
2660:
2653:
2597:
2434:
2391:
2356:
1874:
1533:
1423:
3458:
The "signature" section already gives all the postnomial letters that are necessary. :-)
3254:
2664:
2051:
Thanks. I support the efforts of getting non-personal, and try to use the given methods.
3424:
3398:
3373:
3031:
2900:
2671:
2639:
1898:
1696:
1537:
1500:
1471:
3577:
3298:
3007:
2999:
2368:
2256:
2176:
Yes but in that context math comes first and (preferred) encyclopedic style second.--
2122:
1857:
1805:
2865:
2998:
As you are talking of iterative methods, I guess that you are talking of Hurwitz's
2329:
2135:
I'm not sure I agree with this. There are situations in mathematics writing where
1951:
1907:
There have been many discussion here, arguing against the editorial or noble "we".
1760:
3350:
There's great lot of similar edits. I don't have the time to fix them all, so I
3137:
2636:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Recurrence relations integration function
3384:
3337:
2815:
It seems surprising that they didn't already exist. Is more such work in order?
2765:
2751:
2734:
2695:
2309:
2291:
2177:
2066:
2003:
cleanup templates if a mathematics article uses "we". I personally think it is
1980:
1861:
1860:
for featured article (eventually), so I want to clear up any potential issues. –
1634:
1590:
One could make the argument that this draft simply reproduces content from the
2593:
2430:
2387:
2352:
3420:
3369:
3312:
2668:
2364:
1894:
1552:
1521:
1468:
1366:
I recommend it better to be put it in mainspace than outright deletion. --
3336:
templates & categories at the end of the article or in the infobox.--
3080:
are some idiosyncrasies in the syntax which differ from standard LaTex:
2930:
2091:
is a compact space." This seems unavoidable (and it's not clear that it
1467:
who appears to be an important person in mathematical logic. Please see
3383:
the only reason for their creation, they probably should get deleted.--
1570:
I don't know if I will be perm-banned from Knowledge by saying this but
2429:, please see my comment on the article Talk page regarding your edit.
1741:
The following are pages moved from the draftspace to mainspace by me:
1693:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 June 8#Exceptional curve
3503:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 June 25#Acoptic polygon
3075:
There is now a project to migrate away from the texvc renderer for
2290:
in this context merely for emphasis, it is also a standard part of
2933:. It is useful in iterative method. We need an article about it.
2830:"Countering systemic bias/Mathematics" at Miscellany for Deletion
2731:
v:Talk:WikiJournal of Science/Spaces in mathematics#Third review
1324:
to right. It's like they're trying to apply the converse of the
3214:
not needed and not working anymore, done on en-wiki mainspace
3150:
acceptable if the document doesn't use sectioning with \part.
1224:
33:
2750:
Also a printer friendly version (pdf file) is now available.
2386:
technically correct. I'll likely hear about it if it's not.
1530:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 June 2#M22 graph
1248:
1437:
You might also ask at the academic journals wikiproject:
2959:
See these articles. H-matrix is an important subject. --
2870:
This monotonic matrix is a integer rectangular matrix.
3351:
3278:
3114:
redefinition would involve changing the character code
3103:
redefinition would involve changing the character code
2560:
1683:
3433:
Ha, looks like you are a bit quicker than I am :). --
3401:
created just in order to edit-war over this (!!?). --
2665:
http://people.ee.duke.edu/~lcarin/Kronecker_Graphs.pdf
1927:
We define the Teichmüller space as blah blah blah blah
1268:. For instructions for reviewing the article, follow
3249:, these involve some more complex problems with the
3172:
conflicts with puenc.def e.g. from hyperref package
2860:
First definition is as same as wikipedia article of
2694:(and probably will be copied hereto). A precedent?
1848:
Do we have an opinion about using the first person?
3245:Subsequent stages in the project are discussed at
1414:Expert advice on notability of a journal requested
3231:Chemistry environment, done on en-wiki mainspace
3002:(H being an abbreviation of Hurwitz), and not of
2410:Integrability conditions for differential systems
1350:Should this be moved to mainspace? (or deleted?)
2363:I agree. Moreover, the definition is based on a
2113:IMO, the imperative mood is unavoidable only in
3417:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Bueller 007
2659:Graph theory-savvy editors may wish to look at
2632:Draft:Recurrence relations integration function
2626:Draft:Recurrence relations integration function
3183:conflicts with text command \H{0} which is ő.
1714:FYI, I started a requested move discussion at
1232:This page has archives. Sections older than
57:
8:
3368:) to stop adding it, and to help undoing. -
1993:Like Michael Hardy, I object to using silly
3070:Migration away from old texvc <math: -->
3161:this only conflicts with siunitx package.
2978:
2934:
2871:
2786:I just created these four redirect pages:
2686:A somewhat better version of our article "
1499:Thanks for pointing that out. I fixed it.
64:
50:
3536:Category:Bplus-Class mathematics articles
3521:Category:Bplus-Class mathematics articles
3044:In its present state, the article titled
3125:causes normal align environment to fail
3082:
1463:We do not appear to have a biography of
1394:I added cats and the start of a lede. --
2253:Fundamental theorem of arithmetic#Proof
1885:" That article clearly needs some work
88:
3397:Thanks, all. Now there seems to be a
2038:subsuming. Consider also the hostile "
1487:2601:445:437F:FE66:E44E:27D1:2A2E:2EBF
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics
3584:WikiProject Mathematics archives/2018
2164:writing, which is a different thing.
1691:, has been nominated for deletion at
1528:, has been nominated for deletion at
7:
3277:I invite other editors' opinions on
2806:Lindeberg–Lévy Central Limit Theorem
2801:Lindeberg–Lévy central limit theorem
2796:Lindeberg–Levy central limit theorem
2791:Lindeberg–Levy Central Limit Theorem
2692:published in WikiJournal of Sciences
2634:a lookover. It is being deleted at
1886:
1551:I went ahead and moved the draft to
1459:Missing biography of Michael Rathjen
1420:Draft:Journal_of_Commutative_Algebra
3250:
3225:
3219:
3076:
2578:call ourselves mathematicians!) --
2046:are the non-harassing, civil ones).
1873:Knowledge has an opinion about it:
1751:European Study Groups with Industry
1345:Draft:Truncated Normal Hurdle Model
1260:is for review of the nomination of
2764:Now copied from WJS to Knowledge.
45:WikiProject Mathematics archives (
32:
3523:has been nominated for discussion
1617:Castelnuovo's contraction theorem
1262:Cantor's first set theory article
1251:Cantor's first set theory article
1236:may be automatically archived by
3527:
2985:2001:2D8:E35D:2645:0:0:BA08:6E01
2961:2001:2D8:E35D:2645:0:0:BA08:6E01
2941:2001:2D8:E35D:2645:0:0:BA08:6E01
2878:2001:2D8:E35D:2645:0:0:BA08:6E01
1887:
1746:Archives of American Mathematics
38:
2915:H-matrix about iterative method
2121:is a compact space, then ...".
2929:with its comparison matrix is
1979:they feel strongly about it.--
1737:Draft pages moved to mainspace
1633:I’m on this, I should mention
1:
3554:
2251:'s". This example comes from
1791:Erdős–Tenenbaum–Ford constant
1303:Langley’s Adventitious Angles
1298:Langley’s Adventitious Angles
1249:"Good Article" nomination of
3257:and your input is welcome.--
1811:Fudan-Zhongzhi Science Award
1879:Often rephrasing using the
1599:for the standard process.
3600:
2630:Would someone mind giving
2563:are fully functioning. --
2530:back to the specifics). --
1776:Alan Gaius Ramsay McIntosh
1687:, which currently targets
1574:Draft:fundamental groupoid
1524:, currently a redirect to
1326:isosceles triangle theorem
3570:17:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
3551:categories for discussion
3515:00:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
3487:18:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
3468:14:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3443:14:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3429:14:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3411:14:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3393:12:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3378:12:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3346:12:03, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3329:11:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3307:03:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3291:02:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
3268:15:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
3247:mw:Extension:Math/Roadmap
3139:; causes teubner to fail
3058:22:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
3040:15:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
3016:15:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
2993:14:30, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
2973:We need an article about
2969:14:28, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
2949:14:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
2909:15:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
2886:14:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
2853:There are two meaning of
2848:18:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
2825:21:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
2774:20:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
2677:15:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
2648:06:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
2602:03:56, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
2588:02:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
2573:02:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
2561:my prognostication skills
2555:23:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2540:23:33, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2525:23:30, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2487:23:28, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2468:23:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2454:22:43, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2439:22:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2422:21:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2396:21:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2377:11:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
2283:01:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
1843:08:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
1818:(sorry this was not math)
1816:Stochastic Thermodynamics
1716:Talk:Immanant of a matrix
1572:here is another example:
2760:06:48, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
2743:04:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
2720:00:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
2704:17:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
2338:21:10, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2318:18:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2304:18:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2265:18:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2218:16:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2199:16:20, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2186:16:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2172:15:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2156:12:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2131:11:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2108:11:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2075:11:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2061:09:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
2019:01:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
1989:01:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
1973:23:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1960:22:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1945:22:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1915:12:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1903:11:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1868:11:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1827:Beatty Memorial Lectures
1732:14:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
1705:22:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1665:20:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1647:20:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1629:19:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1611:13:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1586:00:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
1565:00:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
1546:23:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
1509:03:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
1495:19:06, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
1480:12:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
1451:23:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1429:21:34, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1404:06:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
1390:05:29, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
1376:00:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
1360:21:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
1338:01:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
1315:02:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
1293:19:03, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
3497:Redirect for discussion
2864:. The other definition
2682:WikiJournal of Sciences
3089:Suggested replacement
2690:" is now refereed and
1239:Lowercase sigmabot III
3030:are created by me. --
2781:Central limit theorem
2324:I have to agree with
1801:Spread (intuitionism)
1796:Tropical cryptography
1781:Erika Tatiana Camacho
1592:fundamental groupoid
3546:the category's entry
2273:has such knowledge.
2005:generally preferable
1822:Abundance conjecture
1786:Hendrik Wolter Broer
1766:Garnik A. Karapetyan
1264:for the status of a
3273:Postnomial on Erdos
3240:User:Texvc2LaTeXBot
2688:Space (mathematics)
2243:'s" instead of "so
2239:must be one of the
1689:Exceptional divisor
1253:. Review is needed.
1771:The Story Collider
1571:
3553:page. Thank you.
3235:
3234:
3227:...</chem: -->
3046:Comparison matrix
3021:Comparison matrix
2995:
2983:comment added by
2975:comparison matrix
2951:
2939:comment added by
2888:
2876:comment added by
2674:
2345:Integrable system
2035:equality-oriented
2024:May I recap a bit
1684:Exceptional curve
1677:Exceptional curve
1569:
1532:because it cause
1526:Mathieu group M22
1246:
1245:
95:Nov 2002–Dec 2003
3591:
3568:
3531:
3530:
3299:Bill Cherowitzo
3252:
3228:
3222:
3083:
3078:
2894:monotonic matrix
2855:monotonic matrix
2672:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2210:
2191:our guide here.
2148:
2137:entire paragraph
2100:
2011:
2002:
1996:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1686:
1603:
1328:to a trapezoid.
1258:This review page
1241:
1225:
66:
59:
52:
42:
34:
3599:
3598:
3594:
3593:
3592:
3590:
3589:
3588:
3574:
3573:
3532:
3528:
3525:
3499:
3275:
3221:...</ce: -->
3086:Current syntax
3073:
3004:Hadamard matrix
2917:
2862:monotone matrix
2858:
2832:
2784:
2766:Boris Tsirelson
2752:Boris Tsirelson
2735:Boris Tsirelson
2696:Boris Tsirelson
2684:
2661:Kronecker graph
2657:
2654:Kronecker graph
2628:
2559:Well, at least
2348:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2208:
2146:
2098:
2009:
2000:
1994:
1888:
1875:MOS:FIRSTPERSON
1850:
1739:
1712:
1682:
1679:
1601:
1534:Draft:M22 graph
1519:
1465:Michael Rathjen
1461:
1416:
1348:
1300:
1255:
1237:
1226:
1220:
1211:
1097:
87:
86:
73:
70:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
3597:
3595:
3587:
3586:
3576:
3575:
3541:categorization
3526:
3524:
3518:
3507:David Eppstein
3498:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3492:
3491:
3490:
3489:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3451:
3450:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3333:
3332:
3331:
3274:
3271:
3233:
3232:
3229:
3223:
3216:
3215:
3212:
3209:
3205:
3204:
3202:
3199:
3195:
3194:
3192:
3189:
3185:
3184:
3181:
3178:
3174:
3173:
3170:
3167:
3163:
3162:
3159:
3156:
3152:
3151:
3148:
3145:
3141:
3140:
3134:
3131:
3127:
3126:
3123:
3120:
3116:
3115:
3112:
3109:
3105:
3104:
3101:
3098:
3094:
3093:
3090:
3087:
3072:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3060:
2971:
2916:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2857:
2851:
2831:
2828:
2813:
2812:
2809:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2783:
2777:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2723:
2722:
2683:
2680:
2656:
2651:
2627:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2590:
2527:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2470:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2380:
2379:
2347:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2326:David Eppstein
2322:
2321:
2320:
2296:David Eppstein
2287:
2286:
2285:
2247:is one of the
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2209:Sławomir Biały
2147:Sławomir Biały
2099:Sławomir Biały
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2048:
2047:
2010:Sławomir Biały
1976:
1975:
1933:
1932:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1918:
1917:
1905:
1883:is preferable.
1849:
1846:
1833:deletion.) —-
1830:
1829:
1824:
1819:
1813:
1808:
1803:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1783:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1763:
1758:
1753:
1748:
1738:
1735:
1711:
1708:
1678:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1649:
1631:
1602:Sławomir Biały
1557:David Eppstein
1518:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1460:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1432:
1431:
1415:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1347:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1307:David Eppstein
1299:
1296:
1277:
1276:
1254:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1154:
1098:
1096:
1095:
1040:
985:
930:
875:
820:
765:
710:
655:
600:
545:
490:
435:
380:
325:
270:
215:
160:
105:
84:
83:
82:
79:
78:
75:
74:
69:
68:
61:
54:
46:
43:
37:
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3596:
3585:
3582:
3581:
3579:
3572:
3571:
3566:
3563:
3560:
3559:
3552:
3548:
3547:
3542:
3538:
3537:
3522:
3519:
3517:
3516:
3512:
3508:
3504:
3496:
3488:
3484:
3480:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3465:
3461:
3444:
3440:
3436:
3432:
3431:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3418:
3414:
3413:
3412:
3408:
3404:
3400:
3396:
3395:
3394:
3390:
3386:
3381:
3380:
3379:
3375:
3371:
3367:
3364:
3361:
3357:
3353:
3349:
3348:
3347:
3343:
3339:
3334:
3330:
3326:
3322:
3318:
3314:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3295:
3294:
3293:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3272:
3270:
3269:
3267:_engine": -->
3264:
3260:
3256:
3251:<chem: -->
3248:
3243:
3241:
3230:
3226:<chem: -->
3224:
3218:
3217:
3213:
3210:
3207:
3206:
3203:
3200:
3197:
3196:
3193:
3190:
3187:
3186:
3182:
3179:
3176:
3175:
3171:
3168:
3165:
3164:
3160:
3157:
3154:
3153:
3149:
3146:
3143:
3142:
3138:
3135:
3132:
3129:
3128:
3124:
3121:
3118:
3117:
3113:
3110:
3107:
3106:
3102:
3099:
3096:
3095:
3091:
3088:
3085:
3084:
3081:
3077:<math: -->
3069:
3059:
3055:
3051:
3050:Michael Hardy
3047:
3043:
3042:
3041:
3037:
3033:
3029:
3027:
3022:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3013:
3009:
3005:
3001:
3000:stable matrix
2997:
2996:
2994:
2990:
2986:
2982:
2976:
2972:
2970:
2966:
2962:
2958:
2956:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2950:
2946:
2942:
2938:
2932:
2928:
2924:
2922:
2914:
2910:
2906:
2902:
2898:
2895:
2891:
2890:
2889:
2887:
2883:
2879:
2875:
2868:
2867:
2863:
2856:
2852:
2850:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2829:
2827:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2817:Michael Hardy
2811:
2810:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2782:
2779:Redirects to
2778:
2776:
2775:
2771:
2767:
2762:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2732:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2721:
2717:
2713:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2701:
2697:
2693:
2689:
2681:
2679:
2678:
2675:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2655:
2652:
2650:
2649:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2633:
2625:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2528:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2475:
2471:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2451:
2447:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2436:
2432:
2428:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2358:
2354:
2346:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2275:Michael Hardy
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2197:
2194:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2170:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2153:
2149:
2143:
2138:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2036:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2006:
1999:
1991:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1974:
1971:
1968:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1947:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1937:Michael Hardy
1931:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1916:
1913:
1910:
1906:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1884:
1882:
1881:passive voice
1876:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1866:
1863:
1859:
1858:Group testing
1854:
1847:
1845:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1806:Ludwig Danzer
1804:
1802:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1759:
1757:
1756:M P Chaudhary
1754:
1752:
1749:
1747:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1736:
1734:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1720:Deacon Vorbis
1717:
1709:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1685:
1681:The redirect
1676:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1598:
1593:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1516:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1466:
1458:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1421:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1346:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1297:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1285:Michael Hardy
1282:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1252:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1215:
1214:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:
986:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
935:
931:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
876:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
821:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
766:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
715:
711:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
656:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
605:
601:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
546:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
495:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
436:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:
271:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
161:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
106:
104:
100:
96:
92:
89:
85:Earlier years
81:
80:
77:
76:
72:
67:
62:
60:
55:
53:
48:
47:
41:
36:
35:
27:
23:
19:
3557:
3544:
3534:
3533:
3500:
3457:
3362:
3276:
3244:
3236:
3074:
3025:
2979:— Preceding
2935:— Preceding
2920:
2918:
2896:
2872:— Preceding
2869:
2859:
2833:
2814:
2785:
2763:
2749:
2685:
2658:
2629:
2473:
2427:TakuyaMurata
2349:
2234:
2162:encyclopedic
2161:
2142:in principle
2141:
2136:
2118:
2114:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2081:
2043:
2039:
2034:
2029:
2025:
2004:
1992:
1977:
1948:
1934:
1919:
1878:
1855:
1851:
1831:
1761:Arul Shankar
1740:
1713:
1680:
1652:
1597:WP:SPLITTING
1520:
1462:
1382:Calliopejen1
1352:Calliopejen1
1349:
1321:
1301:
1278:
1266:Good article
1256:
1233:
1156:
1101:
1042:
987:
932:
877:
848:
822:
767:
712:
657:
602:
547:
492:
437:
382:
327:
272:
217:
162:
107:
103:Sep–Dec 2004
99:Jan–Aug 2004
44:
3558:SMcCandlish
3399:new account
3356:Bueller 007
3220:<ce: -->
2712:Mark viking
2710:process? --
2292:modal logic
2193:Paul August
2166:Paul August
1967:Paul August
1909:Paul August
1635:User:R.e.b.
1396:Mark viking
1368:Mark viking
3460:XOR'easter
3317:Attic Salt
3259:Salix alba
3208:\pagecolor
3180:\mathbb{H}
2892:I created
2840:XOR'easter
1998:Essay-like
1853:policies.
1424:joe decker
1330:XOR'easter
91:Motivation
3279:this edit
3032:Sharouser
2901:Sharouser
2640:SmokeyJoe
2365:foliation
1697:Thryduulf
1553:M22 graph
1538:Thryduulf
1522:M22 graph
1517:M22 graph
1501:JRSpriggs
1472:JRSpriggs
1281:this page
1270:this link
3578:Category
3366:contribs
3169:\Complex
3147:\partial
3092:Comment
3008:D.Lazard
2981:unsigned
2937:unsigned
2931:M-matrix
2874:unsigned
2369:D.Lazard
2257:D.Lazard
2123:D.Lazard
1862:♫CheChe♫
1710:Immanant
24: |
20: |
3549:on the
3255:T195861
3201:\mathbb
3191:\mathbf
3028:-matrix
2923:-matrix
2866:is here
2330:Atasato
2030:heureka
1952:Atasato
1653:embrace
1234:15 days
22:Archive
3385:Kmhkmh
3338:Kmhkmh
3211:remove
3158:\angle
3071:engine
2977:too.
2927:matrix
2310:Kmhkmh
2178:Kmhkmh
2115:proofs
2093:should
2085:Assume
2067:Kmhkmh
1981:Kmhkmh
1728:videos
1724:carbon
3354:user
3352:asked
3188:\bold
3144:\part
3122:\land
2925:is a
2669:/wiae
2638:. --
2594:DonFB
2474:every
2431:DonFB
2388:DonFB
2353:DonFB
2087:that
2053:Purgy
1441:. --
1439:WT:AJ
1322:close
16:<
3511:talk
3501:See
3483:talk
3464:talk
3439:talk
3425:talk
3421:DVdm
3419:. -
3415:See
3407:talk
3389:talk
3374:talk
3370:DVdm
3360:talk
3342:talk
3325:talk
3313:DVdm
3303:talk
3287:talk
3263:talk
3198:\Bbb
3155:\ang
3136:see
3133:\lor
3119:\and
3054:talk
3036:talk
3023:and
3012:talk
2989:talk
2965:talk
2945:talk
2905:talk
2897:Done
2882:talk
2844:talk
2834:See
2821:talk
2770:talk
2756:talk
2739:talk
2716:talk
2700:talk
2673:/tlk
2644:talk
2598:talk
2584:talk
2580:Taku
2569:talk
2551:talk
2547:Taku
2536:talk
2521:talk
2483:talk
2479:Taku
2464:talk
2460:Taku
2450:talk
2435:talk
2418:talk
2414:Taku
2392:talk
2373:talk
2357:talk
2334:talk
2314:talk
2300:talk
2279:talk
2261:talk
2214:talk
2182:talk
2152:talk
2127:talk
2104:talk
2071:talk
2057:talk
2015:talk
1985:talk
1956:talk
1941:talk
1899:talk
1895:DVdm
1893:. -
1865:talk
1839:talk
1835:Taku
1718:. –
1701:talk
1661:talk
1657:Taku
1643:talk
1639:Taku
1625:talk
1621:Taku
1607:talk
1582:talk
1578:Taku
1561:talk
1542:talk
1505:talk
1491:talk
1476:talk
1447:talk
1400:talk
1386:talk
1372:talk
1356:talk
1334:talk
1311:talk
1289:talk
1158:2024
1103:2023
1044:2022
989:2021
934:2020
879:2019
824:2018
769:2017
714:2016
659:2015
604:2014
549:2013
494:2012
439:2011
384:2010
329:2009
274:2008
219:2007
164:2006
109:2005
26:2018
3567:😼
3505:. —
3479:JBL
3435:JBL
3403:JBL
3321:JBL
3283:JBL
3265:):
3130:\or
3100:\$
2565:JBL
2532:JBL
2517:JBL
2446:JBL
2294:. —
1877:: "
1443:JBL
1279:At
1207:Dec
1203:Nov
1199:Oct
1195:Sep
1191:Aug
1187:Jul
1183:Jun
1179:May
1175:Apr
1171:Mar
1167:Feb
1163:Jan
1152:Dec
1148:Nov
1144:Oct
1140:Sep
1136:Aug
1132:Jul
1128:Jun
1124:May
1120:Apr
1116:Mar
1112:Feb
1108:Jan
1093:Dec
1089:Nov
1085:Oct
1081:Sep
1077:Aug
1073:Jul
1069:Jun
1065:May
1061:Apr
1057:Mar
1053:Feb
1049:Jan
1038:Dec
1034:Nov
1030:Oct
1026:Sep
1022:Aug
1018:Jul
1014:Jun
1010:May
1006:Apr
1002:Mar
998:Feb
994:Jan
983:Dec
979:Nov
975:Oct
971:Sep
967:Aug
963:Jul
959:Jun
955:May
951:Apr
947:Mar
943:Feb
939:Jan
928:Dec
924:Nov
920:Oct
916:Sep
912:Aug
908:Jul
904:Jun
900:May
896:Apr
892:Mar
888:Feb
884:Jan
873:Dec
869:Nov
865:Oct
861:Sep
857:Aug
853:Jul
849:Jun
845:May
841:Apr
837:Mar
833:Feb
829:Jan
818:Dec
814:Nov
810:Oct
806:Sep
802:Aug
798:Jul
794:Jun
790:May
786:Apr
782:Mar
778:Feb
774:Jan
763:Dec
759:Nov
755:Oct
751:Sep
747:Aug
743:Jul
739:Jun
735:May
731:Apr
727:Mar
723:Feb
719:Jan
708:Dec
704:Nov
700:Oct
696:Sep
692:Aug
688:Jul
684:Jun
680:May
676:Apr
672:Mar
668:Feb
664:Jan
653:Dec
649:Nov
645:Oct
641:Sep
637:Aug
633:Jul
629:Jun
625:May
621:Apr
617:Mar
613:Feb
609:Jan
598:Dec
594:Nov
590:Oct
586:Sep
582:Aug
578:Jul
574:Jun
570:May
566:Apr
562:Mar
558:Feb
554:Jan
543:Dec
539:Nov
535:Oct
531:Sep
527:Aug
523:Jul
519:Jun
515:May
511:Apr
507:Mar
503:Feb
499:Jan
488:Dec
484:Nov
480:Oct
476:Sep
472:Aug
468:Jul
464:Jun
460:May
456:Apr
452:Mar
448:Feb
444:Jan
433:Dec
429:Nov
425:Oct
421:Sep
417:Aug
413:Jul
409:Jun
405:May
401:Apr
397:Mar
393:Feb
389:Jan
378:Dec
374:Nov
370:Oct
366:Sep
362:Aug
358:Jul
354:Jun
350:May
346:Apr
342:Mar
338:Feb
334:Jan
323:Dec
319:Nov
315:Oct
311:Sep
307:Aug
303:Jul
299:Jun
295:May
291:Apr
287:Mar
283:Feb
279:Jan
268:Dec
264:Nov
260:Oct
256:Sep
252:Aug
248:Jul
244:Jun
240:May
236:Apr
232:Mar
228:Feb
224:Jan
213:Dec
209:Nov
205:Oct
201:Sep
197:Aug
193:Jul
189:Jun
185:May
181:Apr
177:Mar
173:Feb
169:Jan
158:Dec
154:Nov
150:Oct
146:Sep
142:Aug
138:Jul
134:Jun
130:May
126:Apr
122:Mar
118:Feb
114:Jan
3580::
3555:—
3513:)
3485:)
3466:)
3441:)
3427:)
3409:)
3391:)
3376:)
3344:)
3327:)
3315:,
3305:)
3289:)
3177:\H
3166:\C
3111:\%
3097:$
3056:)
3038:)
3014:)
2991:)
2967:)
2947:)
2907:)
2899:--
2884:)
2846:)
2838:.
2823:)
2772:)
2758:)
2741:)
2718:)
2702:)
2646:)
2600:)
2586:)
2571:)
2553:)
2538:)
2523:)
2485:)
2466:)
2452:)
2437:)
2420:)
2394:)
2375:)
2359:)
2336:)
2316:)
2302:)
2281:)
2263:)
2216:)
2184:)
2154:)
2129:)
2106:)
2073:)
2059:)
2044:WE
2040:WE
2017:)
2001:}}
1995:{{
1987:)
1958:)
1943:)
1901:)
1841:)
1730:)
1726:•
1703:)
1663:)
1645:)
1627:)
1609:)
1584:)
1563:)
1544:)
1507:)
1493:)
1478:)
1470:.
1449:)
1402:)
1388:)
1374:)
1358:)
1336:)
1313:)
1291:)
1272:.
1205:·
1201:·
1197:·
1193:·
1189:·
1185:·
1181:·
1177:·
1173:·
1169:·
1165:·
1161::
1150:·
1146:·
1142:·
1138:·
1134:·
1130:·
1126:·
1122:·
1118:·
1114:·
1110:·
1106::
1091:·
1087:·
1083:·
1079:·
1075:·
1071:·
1067:·
1063:·
1059:·
1055:·
1051:·
1047::
1036:·
1032:·
1028:·
1024:·
1020:·
1016:·
1012:·
1008:·
1004:·
1000:·
996:·
992::
981:·
977:·
973:·
969:·
965:·
961:·
957:·
953:·
949:·
945:·
941:·
937::
926:·
922:·
918:·
914:·
910:·
906:·
902:·
898:·
894:·
890:·
886:·
882::
871:·
867:·
863:·
859:·
855:·
851:·
847:·
843:·
839:·
835:·
831:·
827::
816:·
812:·
808:·
804:·
800:·
796:·
792:·
788:·
784:·
780:·
776:·
772::
761:·
757:·
753:·
749:·
745:·
741:·
737:·
733:·
729:·
725:·
721:·
717::
706:·
702:·
698:·
694:·
690:·
686:·
682:·
678:·
674:·
670:·
666:·
662::
651:·
647:·
643:·
639:·
635:·
631:·
627:·
623:·
619:·
615:·
611:·
607::
596:·
592:·
588:·
584:·
580:·
576:·
572:·
568:·
564:·
560:·
556:·
552::
541:·
537:·
533:·
529:·
525:·
521:·
517:·
513:·
509:·
505:·
501:·
497::
486:·
482:·
478:·
474:·
470:·
466:·
462:·
458:·
454:·
450:·
446:·
442::
431:·
427:·
423:·
419:·
415:·
411:·
407:·
403:·
399:·
395:·
391:·
387::
376:·
372:·
368:·
364:·
360:·
356:·
352:·
348:·
344:·
340:·
336:·
332::
321:·
317:·
313:·
309:·
305:·
301:·
297:·
293:·
289:·
285:·
281:·
277::
266:·
262:·
258:·
254:·
250:·
246:·
242:·
238:·
234:·
230:·
226:·
222::
211:·
207:·
203:·
199:·
195:·
191:·
187:·
183:·
179:·
175:·
171:·
167::
156:·
152:·
148:·
144:·
140:·
136:·
132:·
128:·
124:·
120:·
116:·
112::
101:·
97:·
93:·
3565:¢
3562:☏
3509:(
3481:(
3462:(
3437:(
3423:(
3405:(
3387:(
3372:(
3363:·
3358:(
3340:(
3323:(
3301:(
3285:(
3261:(
3108:%
3052:(
3034:(
3026:H
3010:(
2987:(
2963:(
2943:(
2921:H
2903:(
2880:(
2842:(
2819:(
2768:(
2754:(
2737:(
2714:(
2698:(
2642:(
2596:(
2582:(
2567:(
2549:(
2534:(
2519:(
2481:(
2462:(
2448:(
2433:(
2416:(
2390:(
2371:(
2355:(
2332:(
2312:(
2298:(
2277:(
2259:(
2249:r
2245:q
2241:r
2237:q
2212:(
2196:☎
2180:(
2169:☎
2150:(
2125:(
2119:X
2102:(
2089:X
2083:"
2069:(
2055:(
2026:?
2013:(
1983:(
1970:☎
1954:(
1939:(
1912:☎
1897:(
1837:(
1722:(
1699:(
1659:(
1641:(
1623:(
1605:(
1580:(
1559:(
1540:(
1503:(
1489:(
1474:(
1445:(
1398:(
1384:(
1370:(
1354:(
1332:(
1309:(
1287:(
1242:.
71:)
65:e
58:t
51:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
